I don't understand the controversy. So Burris's documents don't have the appropriate seals and verification? So what, neither does Obama's documents!? Yet nobody is questioning if Obama, now using the nomiker Barack Hussein Obama, is legally able to take the Presidency. Why pick on Burris when he has a lot more legitimacy than Soetoro (he was appointed by a sitting governor per the law and never had other names, foreign residency, foreign adoptions, travels to banned countries, etc).
I don't understand the controversy. So Burris's documents don't have the appropriate seals and verification? So what, neither does Obama's documents!? Yet nobody is questioning if Obama, now using the nomiker Barack Hussein Obama, is legally able to take the Presidency. Why pick on Burris when he has a lot more legitimacy than Soetoro (he was appointed by a sitting governor per the law and never had other names, foreign residency, foreign adoptions, travels to banned countries, etc).
NouvelleOrdre 3 years ago