Rods Underwater Footage

[theprimemeridians]

I am saddened that Jose would make such an arrogant statement! (capture one)!? We may be dealing with a life form that if faster in many ways than the Human race. No telling what these friends can do to us if we decide they have no rights of any kind. They don't need machines,they have been seen by Nasa in orbit as well. So tread with respect here. See what happenned to Steve Irwin. I believe Rods have a right to be here. If they want to interact, there is a way to figure how to ASK.

[tudorrx]

all i see is turtle shit!!!!!!!!!!!!

[pkrska]

Catch a specimen? They're gonna kill it, then rip it apart.

[ltcode2]

wew that thought me, science can't find the real answer. how about FLYING ROD DISCOVERED ? >>>>>>>>> lame on that human being!

[crlwllns]

A magnetic bottle, might work. Got a magnetic cork?

[kingmackattack42]

Rods may not be material but metaphysical or interdimensional creatures. Ufologists or Usologists theorize that when UFO's dive into the water(becoming USO's) that a water-free tunnel is created out in front of and around them as they travel, thereby giving them no inertial resitance at all.

[orgasmictomato]

@kingmackattack42 You actually show more promise than your counterpart commenters here as that is a reasonable assumption and I also see them as dimensional entities. Not to say that insects do also show on camera as what some call rods, but to blatantly call all "rods" as insects is also false. Same as one cannot call all occupants of the sea ...... fish. Start with rods caught in 1900's - - most likely all insects etc. but to continue with new cameras and infrared captures is the way to go.

[ruythyrreify]

The problem is that they RODS (skyfish) are also filming in winter in cold weather. Insects are usually killed by cold weather. proof, this is amateur video. See from 27 seconds (on Youtube) /watch?v=vNg2yeol0t4

[rahneaeon]

thought the rods could only be seen in infra red!

[orgasmictomato]

@rahneaeon maybe the presenters of videos that openly debunk "rods" are not concerned with science, after all their aim is to discredit the anomalies for profit as a TV show, where science is fighting to retain their point of view not some approach that may influence their pay-packet adversely. These type of presenters show no actual intelligence after all, they have no open mind of reality.

Infrared dimensional entities do not influence directly objects in our dimension, - so no bubble trails!

[chazcov08]

@orgasmictomato What the hell is an "Infrared dimensional entity"? Something made up to try to support this ridiculous belief you have in rods? They are BUGS! I can't believe people still believe in these things after having been shown they are nothing but FLYING INSECTS!

[orgasmictomato]

@chazcov08 Actually you are ignorant as to or lazy as to research? So go take your closed ignorant mind to you beliefs and put your head back under the rock so you don't learn anything, eh? Nothing has shown scientific research to be all your "rods" as bugs, FACT. I don't have belief in "rods" at all. I do have an open mind and research to show and prove that they are NOT ALL BUGS. Insects do not grow to 20 meters across, FACT. Insects as we know them do not travel at 500mph, FACT

[awsome5ful]

are they talking about paris hiltons dildo that flys!?

[ImUghBored]

well....i for one didn't see shit

[ElegantPaws01]

@ImUghBored Me either. I have watched it twice.

[liedetecter2000]

what the fuck are rods

[manaman70]

@liedetecter2000 It's an artifact of the fact that the video is actually made up of frames. Unlike movies which are usually shot in 30 fps home video tends to be in 60 fps. It s only with the advent of home video that these things started to show up. There was a discovery channel show that proved beyond a doubt these are simply insects or other objects, and they tend not to show up in slower film speeds.

[liedetecter2000]

@manaman70 wow, thanks alot. it helped me alot too. ty. :D

[apnudi]

I didn't see anything at all :( is there an HD version or something?

[MORCOPOLO0817]

Two possibilities. One, they evolved from Sea Monkeys and took to the air as their new enviornment. Their new name: Air Monkeys. Or two, they were genetically engineered by splicing the genes of a Sea Monkey and a Moth!

[1acount]

@MORCOPOLO0817 ^GFHKFUKFUKU< AAHUL

[amfikz]

jesus america is goin stupid every day, what is wrong with u people?

to much meds or what?

[0815tobey]

@amfikz

Its not only america, it might be the whole world, except 3rd world countries (they have better to da than looking out for rods, orbs, Ufos, Chemtrailplanes, etc. .

Search for orbs, and you will see flying seeds are held for ufos and orbs.

[OverlordShamala]

@amfikz

Being stupid is funny. They just stand there laughing silly. Ignorance is spreading like fire.

[jagrmari]

What the fuck are we supposed to be seeing here? Nice footage of a sea turtle. Don't see any "rods" though.

[HOLOKRON]

Interesting, they can cross water and air, check out infos on the dogons .

[dustbunnieboo]

I watched several times, but could not see it in the water at all. :-(

[TheColombianOne]

can't see it

[MrMorg19]

These are just insects, them appearing as 'rods' is an optical illusion

[luvUc685]

@MrMorg19 insects dont swim in water, especially salt water

[ParaglidingManiac]

If it's alien, it's definatelly for gathering information on us.

[marchhope]

"like bullets entering the water" maby they are bullets entering the water =p

[durumdeity]

More "e-SCAM-illa" nonsense.

[clnmyjts]

very interesting video post. never thought about the rod entering the water.

I was thinking aboout how they could penitrate the human body and I found a video showing just that exact thing..

It is a crazy phenomena...

[Wacked420]

@clnmyjts what??? a rod penitrating a human? where??

[clnmyjts]

@Wacked420 do you know about the show pinks? look for a rods video with the guy that does the show....A rod was filmed while doing the show and a rod run threw him..

[sihutchuk]

Am I blind?

I can't see diddly squat!

[Travisdjtg]

oh gawd not rods again......

lol people think flying rebarb with wings exists.

[youdienow0]

the sea turtles gonna eat them. lol

[AnthonyV393]

Maybe they are similar to sharks where they Dont stop moving around, so they are constantly moving at 100's of mph and maybe they alaways go to the water to die, if thats the case we would NEVER see/find them, all the things in the ocean would eat them if they were floating or sinking to the bottom. They would also just blend in with the sand.

[ShiekYerbooty]

I wonder why no one ever finds any dead rods or the ground or somesuch

[enaler1001]

hhmmmmm,who knows,maybe theyre stranger than any creature already discovered,maybe they dont die!!

[mxpxboy3]

what a great idea.. if we can't find a dead one an outlandish excuse should do fine... 'the don't die' sigh.

[smittyman66]

I meant to give you a thumbs up..sorry about that. I pretty much agree with you.

[1acount]

@ShiekYerbooty ??maybe thier etheereel travlers ,maybe hier totally imortal,maybe they disslve on death(STAR FJELLY

[chazcov08]

@ShiekYerbooty The same reason we don't find a dead sasquatch, yeti, Loch Ness Monster, or mermaid.

[orgasmictomato]

@chazcov08 No actually you are ignorant of facts, like most you fail to do any research or inquiry of your subject before commenting. Infrared spectrum, some 700nm and above wavelength is not seen by human vision, hence anything residing there is non existent as far as your eyes are concerned, but with technology this is changing...... many conspiracy theories start with unknowns that are actual FACTS. maybe misidentified at the time due to ignorance. TRUTH.

[chazcov08]

@orgasmictomato Ok, Mr. Physicist... Explain to me how something can RESIDE in the infrared spectrum? We see things because they reflect the light around them. Don't believe me, turn off the lights. What do you see?

Real flesh and blood animals we can see because they reflect the light that hits them. Some reflect blues, some reds, some greens. Even some yellows. But they all reflect the visible spectrum that is hitting them.

[orgasmictomato]

@chazcov08 As you do not realise that the human visible spectrum is only a small percentage of the wavelength spectrum from 400nm to 700nm is about all most human eyes can see, that does not include the near infrared of 750nm to 1000nm, mid or far infrared, microwave etc. upward and the lower end as ultraviolet to x-rays etc. so humans are near blind to the actual cosmos around them. FACT. You may see nothing when you turn off the lights, not me.1. Learn by watching my videos (free)

[chazcov08]

@orgasmictomato You miss my point. EVERYTHING reflects all different wavelengths of light. Visible spectrum, UV spectrum, infrared spectrum. I'm well aware that we have a very narrow spectrum we can see (visible light). However, the rods would have to reflect ONLY light from the invisible spectrum.

Please explain how a biological entity can reflect ONLY invisible wavelengths.

[orgasmictomato]

@chazcov08 and you obviously miss my point in that they are not claimed (by me) to be biological entities. Simple.

If you had taken the time to actually view some of my videos, then you would already know this. Plasmoidal electromagnetic entities are not biological, they are unknown as science would have you understand it's present day theories, but maybe this is why they do not want them to undermine their preferred choices of what you are told in the media? You do know what fire is?

[orgasmictomato]

@chazcov08 do you see fire? - YES. does it leave a "dead body" when it is extinguished? do you see that dead body of the fire? (no not the fuel as wood etc.) see this is why you closed minded people will never evolve and grow to be anything , because you do not put your brain to usage in true thought. You utilise electricity, electromagnetic and radio waves as everyday items but do not know what they are FACT. Maybe try to learn rather than openly REBUFF that you do not understand

[orgasmictomato]

@chazcov08 Oh! and on the "EVERYTHING reflects light..... wrong, as science is already working on the "black hole" theory and it does not reflect light... so if one thing does not, then why not two or three or many actually?

Science theory as most all of the existing matter, could be dark matter... but as yet unseen and unproven, does not make it not possible>>>> so think, learn maybe even participate in future discoveries, but STOP blatantly rebuffing people, you show your ignorance

[chazcov08]

@orgasmictomato Ok, so you're saying that these "rods" are made of superdense material that has such a mass that not even light can escape it?

Now who's showing their ignorance.

I'm not saying that there could possibly be SOMETHING in the universe similar to these rods. I just think that, given the evidence available, it's silly to assume they are real.

What EVIDENCE do you have to present that they are nothing more than insects?

[orgasmictomato]

@chazcov08 No, what I said was that not everything "reflects light" their is a big difference. I do not hold to suggested theory that it requires "super dense" material science theory is just that and not accurate in all occasions, see history, they do not get much right, first time around. The "evidence taken from some dip heads from a TV show? get real! Why not spend time on looking at my research and see the proof?. too lazy? same as sceptics who say "all orbs are dust", easy out.

[chazcov08]

@orgasmictomato All orbs are dust. Or other floating particulates. If you believe in any other explanation, then you are not applying Occam's razor.

Also, why would you even mention black holes and rods in the same sentence? Are you just a troll trying to get a rise out of rational thinking human beings?

Also, the very fact that you use the word "proof" shows me that you are not being scientific at the least. Science deals with EVIDENCE, not proof.

[99Sorc]

@ShiekYerbooty because you are assuming they operate like other animals/wildlife on our planet - for all we know its molecular makeup could cause them to catch on fire and turn to ash when they die. my point is we have absolutely no clues showing us anything at all about them. they might even never die - who knows. just dont always assume everything dies the same way as its neighbor.

[orgasmictomato]

@ShiekYerbooty Maybe because you (human) cannot see them........ infrared dimensional entities are not seen by human eyes.... they are only caught with technology that perceives infrared wavelength spectrum, simple when you apply the correct analogy.

[gbhqty6]

lol chewchoo na but realy i herd they can fly thru solid matter so i dont think wer gona get any real proof 4 a long time

[firewilson81]

ok, lets catch some of them. you know the big cave channel 13 went to, in another vid? lets go to that cave with the equipment necessary to get some samples.are we not able to see them with the naked eye bcz of the speed they travel or and their tiny size, do you think? there is a resemblance to kelp, to centipedes, and to dragon flies. also some insects have multiple wings, we see them bcz they have larger bodies, but wings r transparent a cross betn insect kelp ?

[chewchoo]

we're actually living in the testicle of some insanely mind-blowingly big organism that encloses us and our universe within it's testicle. Those 'rods' are just its unused sperm cells.

[UkPR0]

wtf are u on about u wierdo

[DancingSpiderman]

Very good!

My kind of thinking process.

Evolution, masquerading as Intelligent Design, manifesting before our eyes!

[OptionallySavage]

Sadly the most sane, and amusing thing the youtube community has to say on this subject.

[len59356]

@chewchoo ha ha ha nice one...

[mercanaries3]

u ppl need to make ur comments shorter

[dorotaronnieray]

So then what your saying is this, it would be impossable to film an insect or anything else that flaps its wings at a particular speed because the mathmatics say that everytime you did it would distort the image you see and produce a rod effect, NTSC explained, now explain the PAL footage

[iamspecialtoo]

Well I couldnt see a rod in this video, could you? Quote "Rods are a videographic artifact based on the frame capture rate of the videocam versus the wingbeat frequency of the insects. Essentially what you see is several wingbeat cycles of the insect on each frame of the video, creating the illusion of a "rod" with bulges along its length. Anyone with a video camera can duplicate the effect, if you shoot enough footage of flying insects from the right distance."

[chazcov08]

"head over to roswellrods for more info on these weird things "

---

Yeah. An entire community of people with a website devoted to bugs caught on film. Staggering, isn't it? Where is this ultra-high-speed film of a rod in motion? I bet the higher the shutter speed, the shorter the rod becomes. The slower the shutter speed, the longer they become. They are so obviously bugs it STAGGERS the mind that people believe they are real unclassified organisms living in the atmosphere. Staggering!

[SpyderMacFly]

If your so smart then why dont you show us the "BUG" in this video. There is absolutely NO known insect that will dive into the ocean.

[luvUc685]

@chazcov08 there actually is a good amount of highspeed footage of these things.

[greeny129]

well if anyone is interested these have been caught on the imax cameras - and on a 4000fps shot o tiger woods crystal clear - however to get this footage is v costly - head over to roswellrods for more info on these weird things (i disagree about any ufo mumbo jumbo however do think they're weird!)

[ufoaleli]

i know what they are

[chazcov08]

I'm pretty sure that rods are an artifact of using cameras that use an interlaced method of recording video. I'd like to see some progressive scan HD or FILM video of rods in action. I'd be willing to bet you don't get "rods" using this technology.

[uflyingo]

THNKS

[nixter1nixter1]

I see nothing to indicate distance of the unknown objects from the lens, without this vital information it is premature to assign such exotic designations such as "Rods" to this phenomena. The cautious investigator should assume that the objects are very small and very close to the lens, this will yield a theory grounded in the scientific method. To say that this video presents any kind of proof of the existence of so called "Rods" is a bit premature.

[luvUc685]

@nixter1nixter1 it is also premature to say it does not present any kind of proof.