Added: 5 years ago
From: Seahawk4Life
Views: 44,351
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (419)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • lol, with my vapor-x hd6870 and i5 @4.3ghz i get 300fps

  • what does it do

  • why did you call that stress test?

    its the ugliest game on the world and shit grafics -.-

  • lol i got 350 fps average on 4890

  • @alampandatennisrack Was everything set to max though?

  • omg ur so cool!

  • Idk if anyone noticed this, but I OC'd my 9800GTX+ as far as I could, and the fps didn't increase. Then I find out that OCing the CPU is what gives you insane FPS on that bechnmarker. Like the guy at the top with the i7@4GHz. So I OC'd my q9400 a full GHz and increase my fps by 100 to 214 avg.

  • 1920x1200 maxed out AA etc, 300 fps on i7 920@4ghz, 6gb ddr3, gtx295

  • thats nice but you should type in console fps_max 999

    than you could see what you got because you cant get over 300 fps without fps_max

  • 1920x1200 maxed out 134.5fps on i7 920@2.77ghz, 6bg ram ddr3, 8800gt...

    fail graphics card....

  • lol i have a 9800gt OC'd Maxxed out @ 1920x1080 on DX9 running at 100~ fps

  • On high details, 1680x1050 resolution, I got an average of 290 FPS.

    I have two NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280s running on SLI.

  • @MichaelKMcCallum

    old cards made for old directx will run faster than new cards made for new direct x. thats how it works

  • @MichaelKMcCallum i get that with 1 msi r6950 twin frozr ii

  • der hat keine hobbys^^

    gruß aus deutschland

    =D

  • and my motherboard and video card support pci-express 2.0 x16 lane

  • My comp, Q6600 Evga 9800 GTX+ 2x2gb ocz reaper 800mhz dual channel and I scored 220.46 fps on the stress test with max detail no aa no anos 1680x1050

  • 89.4fps is not high...i get 110fps with my gma 950!! at dxlevel 80 though.

  • lol, dxlvl 80 makes a BIG difference

  • lol i got 74 fps on my laptop which has a radeon 512mb graphic card (came stock) lol so thats not 2 much higher with all that extra stuff

    but good good vid =]

  • lol 8800 GT is a bit of an overkill for css, don't you think?

  • well this suck, i own u with 4x3.0cpu and my fuckin ati hd 4870 !!

  • good job, you payed too much for a graphics card

  • GTX geforce 9600 alpha dog edition: ALL settings at full. 1920x1200. i get 299 fps.

    i i write fps_max 999 in console i get 350fps

  • hmm I wonder how this is possible. I just did a stress test with all maxed at I think only 1280x1024 and got 219 with my 8800gtx. I am only using one gig of ram atm because the other one is dead...

    are you doing 16 quality AA? and full AF?

  • yes

  • Ok I re-ran 16xQAA and got 214fps. Then, I ran 1920x1200 16xQTSSAA 16xAF and got 211fps :D.

  • 199.45fps @ 1920x1200 16xQAA 16xAF. Q6600 + 8800GTS SLI

  • CSS is a RAM and CPU dependant game.

  • 333 for me. 1680x1050.

  • 159 fps

  • 89.24 fps ??

    I have an nVidia 9500 GS with Intel Core 2 Quad, 4 GB RAM and i have a average of 83.56.. Hmmmmmm.. I wonder if i had an 8800 GTX what would happen :) !

  • hes running it will AA to the max and all that jazz, you probably just run on normal or something

  • No, i have everything on the max, inclusively with AA and AF. So yeah ... Don't think you are one good ass when you are just jealous because your rig sucks...

  • lol ok buddy you just made yourself look like a jackass. and my "rig" doesnt "suck"

  • Learn to use capital letters. And yeah, maybe your rig doesn't suck.

  • lawl. css main compenants dont run on video cards. its all about the ram, & cpu.

  • if you wanna run such demo on youtube...PLEASE use fraps...whats the point of us on youtube watching something that is completely blur and pixelated and then claiming that you are running it close to hi def resolution...you know what i mean

  • looooooooooooooooooooooool

    you are a retard

    "we have 89.24 frames per second, freakin awesome!" lol, that sucks!!

    on my shit laptop i have 180fps

  • sure

  • once again, you probably dont have AA and AF enbabled and all the bells and whistles running like this guy does. you probably run on just high with normal.

  • your a faggg, its awsome becuse he has every fucking thing maxed out all the way, now it would suck if he got that when it was not maxed out so your retarded.

  • how do i make the frame limit higher?

  • WHAT?? 89 FPS? LOL thats really shitty isnt it?

  • yes it is

  • xd..

  • lol what a joke, when i set my fps_max 500 i get 400 to 500 fps. 4870 x2= rape rape rape

  • woow

  • lol i got 245fps average i got something like a 8600gt x2

  • i get 292 on my Nvidia 8800GT

  • GF 8600 GT 512 , 300 fps =)

  • nice!

  • psl dont upload these movies...

  • i have 278.05 fps in stress test with a Nvidia Geforce 9800 GT :)

    I Like ^^ my 9800 GT

  • Im getting two 9800gt's :D

  • its not an 8800 at all cuz the 8800s get at least 150 fps at all high

  • more, have to sli 8800Gts 640MB Costum, and i get maybe 240 to 300

  • lol noob...no you dont need sli to get past 300, you just have to make sure it doesn't BOTTLENECK, check out my vid, one 8800 gtx stress test 440fps average

  • first dont call me noob. I work at a local Tv station and i edit video at my home. So i have to Screens. Yeah i know you dont have to have sli to get like 300 in fps. But i have to 8800 Gts and they are4 not the best Graphics cards anymore.

  • do you even know what bottlenecking is? as cards get better, older cards dont "get worse", thats not the evolution of technology. take a look at this video ----> watch?v=z56dRuQIpMw

    that was played with an 8800 gt oc'd. and your telling me that your 8800 gts cant do 300fps? my 8800 gtx can do 450, stop bottlenecking you performance!

  • Omfg you Fag, mine can go like 400Fps, Cause they are Custom. Yeah we can do that here in denmark. And i didden say that my card was getting worse. I said that they are not the best graphic cards anymore, because the video games are running higher Fps and Video settings. Now im running Sli and i can get it over 300, but thats average 240 - 300.. I can get it over 300Fps!!

  • good for you, retard, sli is for spoiled brats

  • Omfg your not 20 years old. Little Bitch. Come to denmark and i will Fuck you up!

  • oh wow, a NOT 20yrs old joke, how funny. first off grandpa, i'll kill you, second off.....internet threats, rly? ooohhh i'm shakin in my boots. i'll stomp one foot on the ground and you'll be screaming like a little bitch

  • yeah hahah will see asshole

  • you made a threat yourself.

  • I'm a turd.

  • lol, i got 144.01 fps on my

    NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT

    AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 5000+

    3 GB RAM

    ... your card isen't that good. i used the same settings as you.

  • ok if i sound mean, sorry BUT SHUT THE FUCK UP! a geforce 8500 gt is a JOKE compared to the 8800 gtx, only rsn he's getting lower frames than he should is becuz of his cpu bottleneck, around 4ghz dual core will get you no more bottleneck, check my vids, css stress test 450fps average

  • Do you realize how much the drivers have changed since almost 3 years ago when this video was added?

  • it hasnt even been 2 years ._.

  • be that as it may.... lol. My bad

    but the point is still valid. =)

  • i might get a 8600gt but i still wants me a 8800 gtx :D

  • hasn't even been 2 yrs...

  • the human eye limit is ca 20 fps, this is proven, and if you don't believe me, give me a reason not to believe it.

  • it's not. you can clearly see the difference between 20 and 100 fps.

  • oh dont give me that human eye shit, dont make excuses cuz u have a shitty pc

  • Actually, not even close. 20FPS is basically the minimum needed in order to have your mind be tricked into seeing fluid motion. However, you can still tell a VASTLY noticeable difference when you use higher framerates.

  • i have a 8500 gt and i get better than that on high graphics settings

  • you can get a lot more fps on that test with your videocard.. find out what is bottlenecking u..

  • Read the description retard

  • your all a bunch of geeks T.T

  • heh, funny that you were on this video when you commented. fag.

  • my laptop has 250-300 fps :P

  • 10-25 fps built in video card

  • Notice his resolution?

  • LOL 89! ure fucking happy about that sack of crap? nice

  • You can't see jackshit above 60 and most of the time you're only seeing around 30 FPS, 60 is the LIMIT of the human eye. Also, check the resolution, shithead.

  • ok then sorry it just seems smoother @ source you dick im running @ the same resolution nice one.

  • Although you're right, the brain can distinguish up to 230 fps jumping down to 80 fps. People don't complain about the stress test fps because that is the AVERAGE, but if your computer is constantly jumping from high fps to low fps your brain will notice it drastically.

  • That's because that's your computer skipping. That happens to me, going from five hundred to three hundred (single-player standing still in an empty box of an untextured map, don't worry) and I notice it because it's actually pausing. Your FPS shows you a hit but not a pause because it's not detecting a pause, the whole dang thing skips.

  • ok.. i set my fps to 60 and then to 100 and i see the diference.. so.. thats not the limit for human eye..

  • No you didn't, and it's pretty easy to lie. It's been proven several times the human eye cannot see past 60 frames per second, no matter what anyone on YouTube says.

  • gigaz3r0,

    your eyes sucks

  • Jungleeeeeeefender,

    Your English fails and you clearly have no fucking clue what you're talking about. Go to Wiki and don't argue on the internet.

  • u sucks

  • sucks i have 300 fps

  • 89 is good. Why? Why u need more then 60?? TBH.

  • Nvidia 8800 gtx 769mb oc

    AMD Athlon(tm)64 FX-55 Processor 2.61 ghz

    2gb of ram

    Cooler master stacker case

    20 ince Hyundai hd t.v

    Creative sound blaster sound card

  • 89???

    I got:

    AMD Athlon 64 X2 6400+

    3 gigs

    8800 GTS 320mb and get 190 FPS on the stress test at a 1680X1050 res.

  • it's his cpu, it's bottlenecking his video card.....

  • i can have 9-20 fps, on a 5v5 on pretty much any map, and u say 25 and u still play, wuss. try play 9 and still pwn.

  • you faggots have no clue what supersampling AA is and claim you run the same settings.

  • 25 fps..... nvidia ge force fx 5200..... People deam this "unplayable" but i still do it

  • I get 139fps, same setting with 1600 x 1200 res... on a 7950GT

  • sucks

  • Well I Just got a VisionTek Ati Radeon 4850

  • tf2 needs a stress test :)

  • I ran this same test at 1680x1050 and achieved 257.7fps

  • Source (other than TF2) isn't actually amazing graphics anymore... I have the same card and i can run crysis at nearly max but sometimes i have to turn it down a little when it gets laggy. Why didnt you show off a more demanding game instead?

  • lol this video was posted about a year and a half ago.

  • hahaha u just owned him

  • Hmm intreasting, I have an 8800GTX OC, and yet its geting 73.84 FPS, I think its my CPU that is bottnecking it (AMD 5000+ Duo Core)

  • My PC is epic. lololololololol.

  • yes it is....u shud be seeing HUNDREDS more, check out my vid to fix the problem

  • Dual-Core 6400+ 3.2GHz

    2x2048MB

    GeForce 8800GT 512MB

    i get about 200 fps on source

  • Is the 8800GT better than the 8800GTX?

  • No but its quite close.

  • I'm thinking of getting a 8800GTX but does it makes musch difference on a 17" resolution?

  • Debating on 8800gt or 8800gtx??? Definitely don't get the 8800GTX it's a older card and uses alot of power. Go with the 8800GT/9600GT/8800GS/9800GT on a 17" resolution.

  • Thanks m8 ^^

  • Yup cause they use far less power and aren't to much slower than the 8800GTX at all. If you play mostly heavy games(crysis) go with 8800GT/9800GT. If you play a lot of lighter games (cod2) then try to go for the 8800GS/9600GT (they still can play the heavy games decently while saving some cash).

  • Ok thnx, I'm getting the 8800GT in that case, I just need to play Unreal 3 :P

  • WELL the 8800GT is now 200 dollars right next to the 9800GTX....I have an 8800GT and my friend has the SAME case as me and a 9800GTX and can play any game with better fps than me...i mean look at my CSS vid i got 260 fps in stress test he gets around 310... and the price difference isnt that much for a better card

  • on ebay the 8800 gtx wont go over 170 bucks

  • i have dual 7600gt

    and i get 108 not changing resolition

  • pff el cerebro humano procesa de 24 a 35fps, xD

    pero ayudan tantos fps a que cuando grabes con fraps o ayan muchos poligonos no vas diferencias

  • same fps.. exactly

    8800gt ZOTAC

    p4 2.93ghz

  • what resolution you running at?

  • Seriously NO ONE knows about resolution..... OH I HAVE A 8600 AND I CAN BEAT YOUR FPS YOUR CARD SUCKS.... Take yours off 1024x768 and put it on 1800x1440 and tell me if you get the same FPS as him. The Higher the resolution, the lower the fps morons

  • ur video card is bottlenecking your processor up the ass. better upgrade that cpu

  • smoked some crack lately?

  • thats not that much. u should get more on that card.

    i get 275 FPS on 16:10 wide screen resolution.

    i also got an E6600

    but im running a 9800 GX2

    chek yr max_fps

  • Dude, somthing is wrong with yoru card... I get 150+FPS on th ebenchmark with my 2x7900GT sli

  • that's about right, the 8800GTX is good, but if you put almost any nvidia card on the market in sli, you'll get better rates.  sli is powerful

  • i think you have fps_max 100

    if you want to find your real fps, set the fps_max to 0

  • cs .s is designed for ati cards

    i got a radeon hd2600 pro on the same settings i got 91.2 fps

  • l0l CS:S isn't designed for any brand of card.

  • yep it uses hl2 engine and hl2 is designed for ati i remember radeon 9800 xt came whit hl2 XD

  • The Source engine is optimized for ATi cards (or more likely the other way around), that was the only real selling point that ATi have had in recent years. For a given price of card, the Ati version will generally be faster than the nVidia at a source game.

  • Well I need help guys. I have Css and I did the stress test and I got 10fps. SO then, My friend said he gaveme a graphics card but it looks different then a lot that i see. He gave me what looks like a strip abouy and inch wide and probably 4 inches long. Help?

  • From what you have described it sounds like a RAM stick. You just probably need more RAM in ur machine thats all.

  • my PC is worth about 800-1000 euros

    and my FPS in crysis is 29-31 (everything maxxed 1280x1024) i am happy about that and yess i know multiplayer sucks in crysis but everyone uses hacks on every multiplayer there is on the PC

    but in CSS its off the charts

    btw great vid :P

  • COD4 > CS:Source. Who cares about crysis? Its made for single player. I agree with noujaadw everyone hacks in CS:S. It the one game that really let me down in terms of fun, fair gameplay. Wall hacks, no flashbang/smoke, ESP, you can catch half of everyone using them. I'll never play it again.

  • No i got 100.60 average fps when i did that test

  • That can't be right 89 fps in the stress test i have a 8600gts and i get 100.60 fps on css

  • yes, but what he read out (I think) is the average FPS he got on that benchmark, which is much more 'graphics rich' than your average CSS map.

  • counter strike with a 8800GTX my old 6600GT could handle this game eazy

    go play crysis

  • counter strike is better than crysis

  • no its not :P

  • deffinately is

  • counter strike is everyone using hacks and the emos calling you skilless coes all the other poeple have crap pc and its like DAMM LAG

    the 8800GTX can do so much better then CSS

  • lol and the multiplayer for crysis is terrible, ppl use hax also, and crysis is for ppl who buy these 9000 dollar computers jus to run one game. Crysis is CSS's bitch

  • deffinately not, i've got a computer for 600,- euros (dont know how many dollar that is) and i can run crysis perfect without lagging on High.

    specs. AMD Athlon X2 6000+, ASrock NF6G VSTA, Zotac 8800 GT AMP!, 160GB harddisk.

  • thats almost 1400 dollars and i can buy a computer for less than that and run css om everything high and he is right the only thing good about crysis is graphics, and the sandbox editor

  • what specs. has that cheaper pc?

  • I recommend going with a 8600GT cause they're not much more expensive

  • all ya noobs that think this is bad should go die.

  • Lol! I get 440 FPS with this card and a Q6600 3.6 Ghz. All maxed out on 1280x1024

  • only 225 from a 8800 gts 600 gpu/1900 vram

    E6420

    3 GB ram

    SATA 2 HDDS

  • only 225 from a 8800 gts 600 gpu/1900 vram

    E6420

    3 GB ram

    SATA 2 HDDS

  • Its good to me because hes at high res and has options my card cant even set >.> I'm getting a gtx and quad on tuesday :D Nice seahawk4life :P

  • only 225 from a 8800 gts 600 gpu/1900 vram

    E6420

    3 GB ram

    SATA 2 HDDS

  • i dont get the test?? are you supposed to see the terrorists?

  • the test basically shows different textures rendering simultaneously, and tells you how fast your computer processes it.

  • 203.4 fps with 8800 gts on 1280 x 1024 all maxed out

    im happy :]

  • 1920x1200* res

  • yeah somethings fucked up in your setup lol, i'm on a laptop with 2x go7900gs cards and i get 124.13 FPS on the stress test. Maxed out settings at 1920x1080 res.

  • it is a general rule that older games perform better on older cards.

  • with 1680x 1050:P

  • 8800 Gt SLI 285 fps :D

  • Uhmm... that stress test map does not support HDR... just so you know. ¬.¬

  • Lmfao that is shit fps. I get over 200fps on my 8600 Geforce lol sooooo not so "Frikin awsome" your card is lol.

  • Notice the resolution dumbass. hes geting everything maxed out, so i can gaurentee that you dont run over 200FPS, maybe when you look in a corner of a dark place of the map you do. But other then that. sit down.