Added: 5 years ago
From: donczCarlos
Views: 25,395
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (69)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • It better then the f-22 and its thirty years old.

  • A C-130 turns better.

  • cccp fucks

  • Another useful job for the Mig-25 --> snow plowing!

  • what's the music?

  • I swear I have heard this music before but what is it?

  • @HoekieBets Hmm im not sure how not a tank is a tank and an explosion is an explosion =3

  • New York to London distance 5,645 kilometres (3,508 mi), 1,435.587 miles per hour (2,310.353 km/h), and an elapsed time of 1 hour 54 minutes and 56.4 seconds, set on 1 September 1974. This equates to an average velocity of about Mach 2.68, including deceleration for in-flight refueling. Peak speeds were probably closer to the declassified cruise speed of Mach 3.2. For comparison, the best commercial Concorde flight time was 2 hours 52 minutes, and the Boeing 747 averages 6 hours 15 minutes.

  • Los Angeles, Ca. to Washington, D.C., distance 2,299.7 miles (3,701.0 km), average speed 2,144.8 miles per hour (3,451.7 km/h), and an elapsed time of 64 minutes 20 seconds. West Coast to East Coast, distance 2,404 miles (3,869 km), average speed 2,124.5 miles per hour (3,419.1 km/h), and an elapsed time of 67 minutes 54 seconds.

  • Maximum acceleration (g-load) rating was just 2.2 g (21.6 m/s²) with full fuel tanks, with an absolute limit of 4.5 g (44.1 m/s²). One MiG-25 withstood an inadvertent 11.5 g (112.8 m/s²) pull during low-altitude dogfight training, but the resulting deformation damaged the airframe beyond repair. Another FACT, again not displaying any bias.

  • The MiG-25 was theoretically capable of a maximum speed of Mach 3+ and a ceiling of 90,000 ft (27,000 m). However, its high speed was problematic: although sufficient thrust was available to reach Mach 3.2, a limit of Mach 2.8 had to be imposed as the turbines tended to overspeed and overheat at higher speeds, possibly damaging them beyond repair. This is a fact, it does not show bias.

  • Cold war is not good but creates lots of legendary stories.

  • whats the music?

  • Can I know the name of this song?

  • LOL ;)

  • Look at the guy at 1:28. Looks like spam in a can. What a pressure suit!

  • Well when you put to space shuttle rocket engines on a jet it better sure as hell be fast!

  • I have a beef with the Russians, how come in every one of their Aviation Patriotic videos, they youse the same general? The guy with the thick eyebrows.

  • @FSX404 Not general, Lieutenant Colonel

  • So I'm not going crazy, it is the same guy. Thanks

  • This one was built to deal with SR-71 Blackbid. The Americans got panic and rushed the F-15 into sevice.

  • @hysa76 Actually, the Mig-25 was built to intercept high altitude, high speed bombers, like the B-70. With the cancellation of the B-70 and F-108 it had little to use its altitude capacity on other than the SR-71. As you say, the West did totally misapprehend its capabilities and that misapprehension was a major influence of the FX program that produced the F-15.

  • @jeselmira2 Soviets build it as defence only bomber interceptor and the West used it as excuse to waste even more taxpayer money on more advanced attack planes.

  • 70 procent of its fuselage contains fuel

  • Its a pure interceptor. Take-off, catch-up, lock-up, fire, get back. Max that was is ever allowed in it is 3000km/h. Max altitude achieved was 37250 from memory. certainly 37000m+ But it can only achieve a good range with a 5300 litre drop tank. Never seen one with it though.

  • mig 25 is the fastest airplane in the soviet force.

  • @batereabc

    fiix me if im wrong, but i think it is the fastest aircraft in the world after the Blackbird

  • @Daniel325new Blackbird is not even designed to fight, its just a reconaissace black shit! And it wont archieve the kind of speed when loaded with missile it just fly at high altitude through thin air, thats the only great features due to it titanium body. MIg-25 is the FASTEST fighter in the world, but it wont last long in the sky. and must come back to base to refuel to take down enemy bomber fast.

  • @ussr2581990 im not saying its not good...

  • Comment removed

  • @thomaspruzina actually, during the initial gulf war 2 Mig-25's were shot down in one flight by f-15 eagles!

  • Comment removed

  • @ussr2581990 actually there was a fighter (interceptor, same as mig-25) version of the blackbird called the YF12A you should read more before you blurt out inaccurate information!!!

  • @adbramsay Its cancell now bitch. Go and sleep american fanboy! Yr scientist is based from all over the world, all u got is moeny to buy them away, not by yr own education, american is too dumb to build one !!!!

  • @ussr2581990 wow calm down. jealous much! again just do not blurt out inaccurate information is all I am saying. I actually quite like the russian airforce and the US, I think that both of them have advantages and disadvantages. which is better is merely a matter of opinion and speculation until a war or conflict were to break out. However if we do go by statistics alone, the fighter counterpart to the mig25 would be the f15. BTW the f15 has a flawless air to air combat ratio including MIGS

  • @adbramsay U mean flawless air combat ration against 3rd world? Yeah everyone knows that, US never engage a formidable air force! U dare deny all yr inventions are invented by locals and none form germany,russia,japna... etc... then thats bullshit!

  • @ussr2581990 just so you know I am actually a Bahamian, so I am impartial to both. I never claimed to be an American. And actually the most of the early mig designs were copies of ww2 nazi concepts that were captured by the red army after ww2. The US got half of the Nazi scientists and the USSR the other half, this is common knowledge. The US engaged the Nazis and the Japanese when their airforce was inferior, by the end of the war look at what happened; destruction. Laminar flow wing go read.

  • @adbramsay Just so u know, i am a british, so i am looking from neutral point of view.But in fact, both the us and ussr did race to capture german scientist to invent on new state of the art weapons. US got lucky despite the russian reaching and planting their flag at the reingstag first.Most of the germans fear of being capture by russian so they fled west. US got the father of V1 rocket to aid them in the space race.

  • @ussr2581990 Look, there is no point in bickering over the internet, I simply pointed out that you were not giving accurate information. I never said that any of the migs were bad, yet you think that the russians are better. This shows bias, which mean you are not impartial. Opinions show individuality, but misinforming people is wrong and someone might catch you in the act. I just want people to know the truth so they can make their own opinions based on fact and not based on a biased opinion.

  • @adbramsay Okay then point out whats biased, like you said opinion is based on individuality. Easy said that someone is dumb,wrong, silliy, but can u list out whats biased. OR because my opinion has offended you?

  • @ussr2581990 "Yr scientist is based from all over the world, all u got is moeny to buy them away, not by yr own education, american is too dumb to build one", "US never engage a formidable air force", "US got lucky". All those quotes show bias. Your opinion has bias, that is why it is an opinion. I never stated which was better, I just corrected your misinformation. I believe that you are upset because I called you out on this. BTW the SR-71 had a bomb bay, so in fact it could drop a bomb(nuke)

  • @adbramsay Dont believe? Just look at american attempt to launch a satelite into orbit, their rocket could only lift 4 meter from take off pint, then i t crash down all over again.Leading by former nazi crew members only did american cope with the space race? Dont be suprise if there are also foreign scientist that help to invent the sr71.

  • @ussr2581990 It may well have had foreign influence, but untile proven otherwise it is just speculation. AGAIN, all I did was try and present a fact from and unbiased point of view. I actually like alot of russian aircraft, but you hate everything American, I don't know why, you have your reasons. It still does not obscure any of the facts I listed.

  • @adbramsay Only when it comes to electrical gadget like apple and HP , for that i do like american product.It just that when it comes to weapon, its best to get those made in russia

  • @ussr2581990 I tend to agree with you on half of that. The US makes some amazing weapons, such as the Barrett M82a1 sniper rifle, also the M1 Abrahams tank is pretty damn impressive too. There is no better assault rifle in the world than the Kalashnikov. Also the US are the only ones to use stealth effectively, admitedly stealth was actually a theory of a Russian scientist, however the Kremlin disregarded his ideas as foolishness, the US on the other hand did not. PAK-FA will be interesting.

  • @adbramsay Thanks god american like you never discount the work of petr ufimsev in the stealth theory that inspire the f-117, and lets not forget other germans,japs,russians...etc in aiding the american in the m1 abram and even the f22 raptor, both side actually made incredible weapons!

  • @ussr2581990 thanks, finally we agree. But please DO NOT call me an American, I am not one.

  • @adbramsay Good that we agree.Or else we will argue till u cant walk.You sound like an american btw.

  • @ussr2581990 sorry if I sound like one, in act I am not, born and bred in the Bahamas grandparents from all over - South Africa and Ireland on my mum's side and Scottish and German on my dad's side.

  • @adbramsay WOW, living in a carribean, hence a fan of the states. Good, keep it up, u are american number one fanboy . Living all over the world!

  • @ussr2581990 you know what, I have tried to be nice, the whole time all I wanted to do was to clarify a false truth that you put forth(a lie). To hell with trying to be nice you prat, you are a closed minded idiot, after meeting you, I've decided I am in favor of abortion in cases of incest. Go screw yourself, I will not waste my time here anymore.

  • @adbramsay What have i done?! You know, me too trying to be nice! I just saying that u admire other jets like the american ones hence u are american fanboy.BUt instead you still trying to offend me. Man, fuck u then, u piece of shit, i wont bother anymore with u!

  • @adbramsay 3 planes ever built only. It is like claiming that Su-37 is best dog-fighter in the world. (Even if it is truth, 2 built planes can't do the s#@t).

    And compare prices of those two planes (not incl. development), while migs were economic (Ni,5kg of silver as shielding,and steel) vs 70% Ti. Factory price 3x higher, sold to USAF for 20x as much :). Good thing about Russians is that they develop weapons to protect their country, not for money (@ Kalashnikov). Cheap doesn't equals LQ...

  • @thomaspruzina i never said ceap = low quality. a prime example of this is the fact that a mig or sukohi can take off and land on unpaved runway whereas all american fighters need paved surfaces. but i got on you because what you said was just plain incorrect. BTW the Kalashnikov is one of the greatest inventions of all time

  • europetheheroes : fuck u rotten brain

  • Slava krasnaya avyatii

  • I have uniform soviet pilot xD

  • Awesome video!

    Honor to these great pilots!

  • It's a miracle...

  • Pomnju tozhe smotrel takuju hunju kak Sluzhu sovetskomu  sojuzu...

  • MIG-25 top speed 2750km/h.

  • It's more then M3...

  • no more than 4000km

  • 3645km/hr is top speed f mig25 foxbat.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more