ideal1Pak it seems you are too dumb that you do not know that imam abu hanifas name is mentioned twice in tirmizi and also his narrartions are mentioned in books such as musnabd dar qutni
as for what you said about imam dar qutni saying imam abu8 hanifa is not a tabi. that is his view but go and chech what imam nawawi and others have to say. you have not done your research properly
(1) Can you tell me the page number of Tazkiratul-Huffaz where Imam Zahbi said that. Bcs I think it is not in Tazkiratul-Huffaz, rather it is in his other book named "Manaqib Abu Hanifa" in which a narrator is "Saif bin Jaber" that is not proved as authentic narrator by any MUHADDIS
(2) Ibn Hajar Asqalani says that it is said by people, not he says for himself.
A narration, about ABU HANIFA's seeing of HAZRAT ANS in the book of HAKIM KABEER, has fault in its chain. There is a narrator in it named "ABU BAKR BIN ABU UMRA" is not proved as authentic by any MUHADDIS.
And all the narrations of KHAWARZMI are also not acceptable due to a narrator named “AHMAD ALHAMDANI” who is rejected by MUHADDISEEN.
See books of JARAH n TADEEL. MUHADDISEEN are agree that none of narrators of fifth category has contact with any SAHABI (companion of Prophet PBUH) n ABU HANIFA is put in sixth category. ABU HANIFA is not at all a TAB’IE (person who saw any companion of Prophet PBUH).
KHATEEB BAGHDADI narrated: DARQUTNI was asked if ANU HANIFA heard something from HAZRAT ANS, he replied, no,n ABU HANIFA did not even saw HAZRAT ANS. even he had no contact with any SAHABI.(TAREEKH E BAGHDAD: v-4, p-208)
@ideal1Pak lmaam dhahabi (RA) writes in Tazkiratul-Huffaz that Imaam Abu Hanifah (RA) as born in 80 AH. He saw Anas Ibn Malik (RA) more than once (meaning) every time Anas Ibn Malik (RA) would visit Kufa.
Ibn Hajar Asqalani says in Tahdhib al-tahdhib, Al-Nu`man ibn Thabit al-Taymi, Abu Hanifa, al-Kufi. It is said that he was Persian. He saw Anas.
Not even a single HADEES from ABU HANIFA is narrated in the whole SEHA E SITTAH (six basic books of AHADEES, are (1)BUKHARI (2)MUSLIM (3)TIRMIZI (4)ABU DAOOD (5)NASAI (6)IBN E MAJA) Now tell what is ABU HANIFA when even authors of these basic books have rejected him. Pity on HANAFI FIQH, pity on HANAFIES.
The first book on HANAFI FIQH was written in 428 HIJRI, after 278 years of death of ABU HANIFA without any SANAD (chain of narrators). the author of book HADAYA was MOTAZLI not Muslim.
so is this one of those so called "grand muftis" in the uk huh?
the prophet(saw) indeed did say that there will come a time where the shcolars will die one after the other, until non is left, the peopl will take JUHALAA/IGNORAMOUSES as leareds, they shall be asked, they will give fatwas without knowledge and misguide themselves and others.wallahi, when i read this authentic hadiith by sayudunaa 'Abdullah ibnu 'Amr(radiAllaahu'anhuma), i think of this kawthari.
AS-SUFFA INSTITUTE PRESENTS: THE LIFE OF KHALID IBN WALID(RA) * Course Date: Saturday 24th & Sunday 25th July 2010 * Course Duration: 9:30am-7:30pm * Course Location: The Great Hall, Aston University, Birmingham B4 7ET FREE PARKING * Course Taught by: SHAYKH ZAHIR MAHMOOD * Course Fee: £40.00 (Students Fee: £30.00) * Open to Brothers & Sisters REGISTER AT: as-suffa .org REGISTER NOW sacrifice....like those before you sacrificed...
usually you will have secret police attending some Islamic gatherings, which means you have to be careful, they keep an eye on everything you say and do otherwise they will report to their big boss....and suddenly you hear the sirens and the bullets will sound 'bida'a ...bidaa bidaa'
No one is 'refuting' the great Imam, this was a matter between the Imams and scholars themselves, we do not take sides out of mere emotions. We love all out Imams, we simply do not follow them in matters which they unintentionally erred. Al Hamdulillah.
Bro Sh. Abu Usamah lecture was rubbish, containing many weak and fabrications. He narrates from Khatib Baghdadi who hated Abu Hanifa and the things he mentions in his book contains weak and fabricators narrators as Imam Shami (the student of Imam Suyuti) mentions. . the same with Bukhari's Tarikh. Nasr bin Ali al-Khareebi has said,
People were either jealous or ignorant of Imam Abu Hanifa (Tahdheeb al kamal, 29/441)
NOTE: NO ONE IS CLAIMING THAT IMAM ABU HANIFAH DID NOT HAVE KNOWLEDGE!!! ASTAGHFIRULLAH HE WAS AN IMAM OF THE MUSLIMS. THE FACT IS THAT HE WAS STRONG IN FIQH BUT WEAK IN HADEETH AND THEREFORE REJECTED BY MANY MANY IMAMS OF HADEETH! THERE IS NOTHING PERSONAL ABOUT IT.
You r also right, it was the people who came after him & changed his madhab. This still does not alter the fact he was weak in hadeeth
Salam Bro, I hope you went to the Legacy of Imam Abu Hanifa conference yesterday (30th Jan 2010). One Ulema said that those that speak ill of other scholars are just envious and jelous of them. It was a very uplifting conference and the the Ulema told us about how amazing the knowledge and memory of the pious predocessors was and how at that time who the ummah followed - even the Amir ul Mumineen. These pseudo scholars like Abu Usama are literralists and should be carefull as to what they say.
@taimkhwaja Very true brother, People like Abu Usamah fail to mention the opinions of Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Kathir, Zhahabi and Suyuti have all classified Abu Hanifah as a strong narrator.
Actually its always been the ashari/sufi cohorts who always love to start a fight. First they claim to be from the Ahlus Sunnah and then they show their true colours with their filty aqa'id etc.
ahh really!? Then plz find me ONE hadith whit the Chain in it wher ther is not one Ashari oder Maturidi!? Find me ONE HADITH you hypocrate then wie can talk... Go to saudi arabia and amuse yourself when the Wahabis destroy the old mosques of the Sahabis!!!
You seem to live in an illusion is you think you can claim the Imams and scholars of ahl al hadeeth for yourself!
asharis . com
Read and get rid of your self-inflicted ignorance.
Furthermore, the asha'irah were able to pose as Ahlus Sunnah and manipulate various madhahib for one simple reason. The reason you will find briefly explain in this article of the relationship between aqeedah and fiqh:
There is no doubt regarding Imam Abu Hanifahs knowledge; people later attributed many lies to Imam Abu Hanifah which were all untrue. The aim of such writings was to taint Imam Abu Hanifa. [Minhaaj Al Sunnah Al Nabaweah, 1/259)
Imam Ibn Abdil Bar a Maliki scholar, has said,
Such things were attributed to Imam Abu Hanifa which were not in him and such things were fabricated against him which were not suitable.(Al Khayraat al hisaan, 157)
usually you will have secret police attending some Islamic gatherings, which means you have to be careful, they keep an eye on everything you say and do otherwise they will report to their big boss....and suddenly you hear the sirens and the bullets will sound 'bida'a ...bidaa bidaa'
ideal1Pak it seems you are too dumb that you do not know that imam abu hanifas name is mentioned twice in tirmizi and also his narrartions are mentioned in books such as musnabd dar qutni
as for what you said about imam dar qutni saying imam abu8 hanifa is not a tabi. that is his view but go and chech what imam nawawi and others have to say. you have not done your research properly
firsahib 4 months ago
GRAVE WORSHIPERS !!!
LearnToReadTheKuran 6 months ago
JAZAKALLAH KHAIRAN
abudujana13 8 months ago
(1) Can you tell me the page number of Tazkiratul-Huffaz where Imam Zahbi said that. Bcs I think it is not in Tazkiratul-Huffaz, rather it is in his other book named "Manaqib Abu Hanifa" in which a narrator is "Saif bin Jaber" that is not proved as authentic narrator by any MUHADDIS
(2) Ibn Hajar Asqalani says that it is said by people, not he says for himself.
ideal1Pak 8 months ago
A narration, about ABU HANIFA's seeing of HAZRAT ANS in the book of HAKIM KABEER, has fault in its chain. There is a narrator in it named "ABU BAKR BIN ABU UMRA" is not proved as authentic by any MUHADDIS.
And all the narrations of KHAWARZMI are also not acceptable due to a narrator named “AHMAD ALHAMDANI” who is rejected by MUHADDISEEN.
ideal1Pak 11 months ago
See books of JARAH n TADEEL. MUHADDISEEN are agree that none of narrators of fifth category has contact with any SAHABI (companion of Prophet PBUH) n ABU HANIFA is put in sixth category. ABU HANIFA is not at all a TAB’IE (person who saw any companion of Prophet PBUH).
KHATEEB BAGHDADI narrated: DARQUTNI was asked if ANU HANIFA heard something from HAZRAT ANS, he replied, no,n ABU HANIFA did not even saw HAZRAT ANS. even he had no contact with any SAHABI.(TAREEKH E BAGHDAD: v-4, p-208)
ideal1Pak 11 months ago
@ideal1Pak lmaam dhahabi (RA) writes in Tazkiratul-Huffaz that Imaam Abu Hanifah (RA) as born in 80 AH. He saw Anas Ibn Malik (RA) more than once (meaning) every time Anas Ibn Malik (RA) would visit Kufa.
Ibn Hajar Asqalani says in Tahdhib al-tahdhib, Al-Nu`man ibn Thabit al-Taymi, Abu Hanifa, al-Kufi. It is said that he was Persian. He saw Anas.
mibrahim01 8 months ago
Not even a single HADEES from ABU HANIFA is narrated in the whole SEHA E SITTAH (six basic books of AHADEES, are (1)BUKHARI (2)MUSLIM (3)TIRMIZI (4)ABU DAOOD (5)NASAI (6)IBN E MAJA) Now tell what is ABU HANIFA when even authors of these basic books have rejected him. Pity on HANAFI FIQH, pity on HANAFIES.
The first book on HANAFI FIQH was written in 428 HIJRI, after 278 years of death of ABU HANIFA without any SANAD (chain of narrators). the author of book HADAYA was MOTAZLI not Muslim.
ideal1Pak 11 months ago
Mashallah, may Allah reward you for your good work
Jazakallah
MURSHEDMM 1 year ago
hahahahahaha
so is this one of those so called "grand muftis" in the uk huh?
the prophet(saw) indeed did say that there will come a time where the shcolars will die one after the other, until non is left, the peopl will take JUHALAA/IGNORAMOUSES as leareds, they shall be asked, they will give fatwas without knowledge and misguide themselves and others.wallahi, when i read this authentic hadiith by sayudunaa 'Abdullah ibnu 'Amr(radiAllaahu'anhuma), i think of this kawthari.
foolish indeed.
abdullahalmahmood 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ghuraba103 1 year ago
Subhanallah........Beautiful lecture on the great salaf, Tabeen, Fuqah, Muhadeeth, Mufasir Imam Azam Abu Hanifa rahmatuallah.
PinPointify 1 year ago
do deobundies actually teach aqeeda, issues of tawheed etc. ?????
kad006 1 year ago
@kad006 obviously they do
oledecoronaldo 1 year ago
@kad006
ofcourse they do, they just dont spend all their time 'refuting' the others or those who donot agree with them.
ali12147 1 year ago
aa this guy is a deobandi...
PunisherLobo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Mashallah Maulana sahib Allah give us all hideyat this beyan is very gud jazak Allah khair !!
amin.
sanaullahnoonari 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
usually you will have secret police attending some Islamic gatherings, which means you have to be careful, they keep an eye on everything you say and do otherwise they will report to their big boss....and suddenly you hear the sirens and the bullets will sound 'bida'a ...bidaa bidaa'
Maturidi333 2 years ago
Once when someone spoke ill of Imam Abu Hanifa in the presence of Waki, the latter scolded him and said,
Whoever speaks ill of Imam Abu Hanifa, he is like an animal and even worst (Al Khayrat al hisaan, p. 72)
Maturidi333 2 years ago
@Maturidi333
No one is 'refuting' the great Imam, this was a matter between the Imams and scholars themselves, we do not take sides out of mere emotions. We love all out Imams, we simply do not follow them in matters which they unintentionally erred. Al Hamdulillah.
zakuk77 2 years ago
Bro Sh. Abu Usamah lecture was rubbish, containing many weak and fabrications. He narrates from Khatib Baghdadi who hated Abu Hanifa and the things he mentions in his book contains weak and fabricators narrators as Imam Shami (the student of Imam Suyuti) mentions. . the same with Bukhari's Tarikh. Nasr bin Ali al-Khareebi has said,
People were either jealous or ignorant of Imam Abu Hanifa (Tahdheeb al kamal, 29/441)
Maturidi333 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@Maturidi333
The issue is NOT as you claim:
tinyurl . com / ycps547
[Read the last comment]
NOTE: NO ONE IS CLAIMING THAT IMAM ABU HANIFAH DID NOT HAVE KNOWLEDGE!!! ASTAGHFIRULLAH HE WAS AN IMAM OF THE MUSLIMS. THE FACT IS THAT HE WAS STRONG IN FIQH BUT WEAK IN HADEETH AND THEREFORE REJECTED BY MANY MANY IMAMS OF HADEETH! THERE IS NOTHING PERSONAL ABOUT IT.
You r also right, it was the people who came after him & changed his madhab. This still does not alter the fact he was weak in hadeeth
zakuk77 2 years ago
Salam Bro, I hope you went to the Legacy of Imam Abu Hanifa conference yesterday (30th Jan 2010). One Ulema said that those that speak ill of other scholars are just envious and jelous of them. It was a very uplifting conference and the the Ulema told us about how amazing the knowledge and memory of the pious predocessors was and how at that time who the ummah followed - even the Amir ul Mumineen. These pseudo scholars like Abu Usama are literralists and should be carefull as to what they say.
taimkhwaja 2 years ago
I had the intention to go but couldn't go. i hope the lecture was recorded?
Maturidi333 2 years ago
@taimkhwaja Very true brother, People like Abu Usamah fail to mention the opinions of Ibn Taymiyyah, Ibn Kathir, Zhahabi and Suyuti have all classified Abu Hanifah as a strong narrator.
shaolin00 1 year ago
so yourn a wahabi salafi bla bla sect talk nothing else!
PunisherLobo 1 year ago
@PunisherLobo
Actually its always been the ashari/sufi cohorts who always love to start a fight. First they claim to be from the Ahlus Sunnah and then they show their true colours with their filty aqa'id etc.
zakuk77 1 year ago
ahh really!? Then plz find me ONE hadith whit the Chain in it wher ther is not one Ashari oder Maturidi!? Find me ONE HADITH you hypocrate then wie can talk... Go to saudi arabia and amuse yourself when the Wahabis destroy the old mosques of the Sahabis!!!
PunisherLobo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PunisherLobo
You seem to live in an illusion is you think you can claim the Imams and scholars of ahl al hadeeth for yourself!
asharis . com
Read and get rid of your self-inflicted ignorance.
Furthermore, the asha'irah were able to pose as Ahlus Sunnah and manipulate various madhahib for one simple reason. The reason you will find briefly explain in this article of the relationship between aqeedah and fiqh:
tinyurl . com / ylcjrdx
Learn before you speak!
zakuk77 1 year ago
Why are you worried about refuting him.. Why cant you accept the fact that you are wasting your time and energy
ehsaan88 2 years ago
His points can be easily refuted here:
/watch?v=TUDLOcpDAC8
tinyurl . com / ycps547
zakuk77 2 years ago
Once when someone spoke ill of Imam Abu Hanifa in the presence of Waki, the latter scolded him and said,
Whoever speaks ill of Imam Abu Hanifa, he is like an animal and even worst (Al Khayrat al hisaan, p. 72)
Maturidi333 2 years ago
Ibn Taymiyyah says:
There is no doubt regarding Imam Abu Hanifahs knowledge; people later attributed many lies to Imam Abu Hanifah which were all untrue. The aim of such writings was to taint Imam Abu Hanifa. [Minhaaj Al Sunnah Al Nabaweah, 1/259)
Imam Ibn Abdil Bar a Maliki scholar, has said,
Such things were attributed to Imam Abu Hanifa which were not in him and such things were fabricated against him which were not suitable.(Al Khayraat al hisaan, 157)
Maturidi333 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
usually you will have secret police attending some Islamic gatherings, which means you have to be careful, they keep an eye on everything you say and do otherwise they will report to their big boss....and suddenly you hear the sirens and the bullets will sound 'bida'a ...bidaa bidaa'
Maturidi333 2 years ago
mashallah i didnt know he was such a reknowned scholar like Sheikh Riyadhl ul Haq and sheikh ahmed ali
halaldawarecords 2 years ago