In the words of Gerald Celente: "The mafia, excuse me banks, need to keep the ponzie scheme going!"
The only way to save the financial future of the country is to tell the RBA and the rest of the central banks/international mafia to go fuck themselves.
@w0y1z92753 I agree with your conclusion in part ,actually we should remove all banks not just the central banks ,,,but is it a really " ponzie scheme" by definition ?
@chotaboy66 You think the banks who are giving the credit at all levels are not aware that much of the owed money is continually rolled over? It's a fraudulent pracitce IMO. I'd also argue that the issuance of currency by the RBA is fraudulent - creating nothing out of nothing and expecting something in return. Paper money backed by nothing is... nothing. Yet, we owe them something substantial in return. The cycle continues. So yes it's a ponzie scheme.
@w0y1z92753 Is your promise of labor nothing ? backed by the property value in question which is redeemable,The definition of a ponzi scheme means investors that stand to gain invest they're own money ? Do banks offer any consideration of value of they're own ? do they loan they're own money that represents anything of value ? Who then is the winner at the end of monetary destruction? indeed there is no winner even the few at the top that ONLY gain temporally will loose it all ultimately SIR.
@chotaboy66 Well, actually when I talked about the creation of paper money backed by nothing... that is exactly what I meant. The RBA just conjures money. It doesn't make an equal aquisition of something substantial such as an equivalent amount of gold. It just conjures that money. Fractional reserve banking is then on practiced onto us by the banks who also loan us money that doesn't exist. I then stated we owe them something substantial in return - Labor, property, other resources.
@w0y1z92753 Fractional multiplication is NOT creation rather is a expansion that multiplies DOWN eventually NOT UP. Creation is by the obligors promissory note signature sir which has the only lawful consideration of value backed by the property value in question thats a liability, financial instrument deposited in the bank.The bank then launders this from circulation by fraud before the fraudulent exchange. The only way to continue expansion is by one of us signing another promissory note sir.
@chotaboy66 Sounds to me like you're arguing in favor of the banking instutions. If that's the case you can suck my cock.
BTW, If you were (as your vids appear to suggest) trying to educate and enlighten people to the fraudulent practices of the Central banking system, it might be a more effective tactic to not type so condecendingly. Lol, getting wound up over my use of the word 'ponzie' instead of worring about the bigger issue at hand, is well a tad silly.
@w0y1z92753 Your assumptions are simply incorrect why? I advocate the eradication of all banks completely with a solution, for all of us to understand SOLUTION we must first comprehend how we are getting screwed EXACTLY ,Simply parroting "ponsi scheme ","money created out of air" divides us further,WHY? Because its simply not true ,instead of jumping to illogical assumptions & telling me to suck your cock get your facts correct before you lay claim to know what your talking about OK MATE.
@chotaboy66 Assumptions are incorrect? I suppose you better tell Gerald Celente and Max Keiser that their assumptions are wrong too. Frequently they refer to the current setups as 'ponzie schemes'.
Getting rid of all banks? Yeah, that would work... not. Where are people supposed to put their money? Under their mattress? Where is credit supposed to come from? Even in your constitution for dummies vid there is an acknowledgement of the need for 'debt free credit'.
@w0y1z92753 Assumptions are incorrect? I suppose you better tell Gerald Celente and Max Keiser that their assumptions are wrong too. Frequently they refer to the current setups as 'ponzie schemes'.
--
We have & we are meet with evasion BANKS DON'T INVEST THERE OWN MONEY what don't you get ? To say the banking system is a ponsi scheme is to claim one hasn't a clue where the root cause of monetary destruction STARTS ,Do these jokers have proof of solution or do they point you to the symptoms?
@chotaboy66 Of course they don't you moron, they create money out of 'fresh air'. They don't need to invest their own money they lend it out en mass, knowing that the majority is going to be fraudulently 'rolled over' as is discussed in your vid. Perhaps you should watch and listen again. Carefully!
Regardless it's a mute point. Who fucking cares if it's a ponzie scheme or not - to get hung up on that point is, quite simply retarded.
I'd love to hear what you think should replace banks.
@w0y1z92753 Money is NOT created as debt ,its created by the purported borrower only the borrower is NOT borrowing rather the borrower is the obligor who creates principal only & its the obligors obligation to PAY DOWN & retire the creation over time to defeat circulatory inflation,Only the BANK claims falsely to be the true creditor ,the bank doesn't retire the obligors payments THEY STEAL THEM which causes the opposite endless MASS circulatory deflation ,& THIS IS THE CAUSE OF NATIONAL DEBT
@chotaboy66 Whatever, I actually like a lot of your videos. But as far as I'm concerned your a tool, and you can fuck off. If talking shit - which is exactly what you have produced in your last few *cough* retorts makes you feel special or something, well continue. I just won't be paying any attention.
When you borrow money from a bank - the bank 'credits' your account. It's credited it with money that doesn't exist physically. Therefore, it's created it.
@chotaboy66 Oh yeah, helping people - By what not offering a real solution? Harping on whether or not something is a ponzie scheme or not, when there are much larger, more substantial questions to be asked on this subject? Yeah, you're a great help to people. My original suspicion that you're one of those argumentative types that just want's to protest and argue over anything, rather than fixing something that's broken and will benefit his fellow man.
@w0y1z92753 My original suspicion that you're one of those argumentative types that just want's to protest and argue over anything, rather than fixing something that's broken and will benefit his fellow man.
--
ARE YOU PARANOID MATE , why fix something thats broken only to have it screw us again when you can replace it completely . Where in the hell is your logic man?
@chotaboy66 Lol, thanks for valitdating my statement from above. - Fix/Change Yeah, you're not in the mood to troll are you.
Fuck off and die you piece of shit.
That should be sufficient to get myself blocked, as I don't plan on debating bullshit with you anymore.
Nice one fuckhead, you may have turned someone to your way of thinking... now you've just added to the obviously long list of people who regard you as a douchebag.
You're still yet to answer my question - what then, would you have replace the banks?
--
If you did INDEED click on my name & visit my channel like you claim you have you will see banks will be replaced with a National NON PROFIT Accounting Common monetary foundry (CMF) established by the people for the people ,credit/money will be created & issued by the people themselves via promissory obligations with NO INTEREST attached based on a simple 1.1.1 ratio.
@chotaboy66 At no point did I ever say I clicked your name, and looked at your channel. I said 'I like your vids'. Which, I do. I watched the Australian Constitution for dummies among others. Are you new to youtube? You don't need to click on someones channel to watch their vids.
It's a bit hard to get away with twisting the truth, considering every word I typed is here, in black and white.
CMFs are essentially still banks, no matter what you call them.
@w0y1z92753 CMFs are essentially still banks, no matter what you call them.
--
PROVE IT MATE? How then do you compare a NON PROFIT monetary foundry that doesn't launder principal & interest out of circulation to a bank that dose . The CMF Is merely accounting that preservers your right & ability to create money & retire money nothing more . NO DEBT , NO LOAN ,
@chotaboy66 Although, I do agree a CMF or monetary institution that loans at cost and not for profit is a great idea. However, you could have said that about 100 posts ago when I originally asked you what you would replace banks with when you stated you wanted to abolish the banks.
@chotaboy66 Besides mate, rather than getting all holier than thou, you might swing more people to your way of thinking if you weren't so condecending when someone has a view that isn't 100% to your liking. Things change when you get people on board, not when you alienate them.
@chotaboy66 Then again, it's becoming clear to me, that you're not one of those people who wants to change a crooked system for the benefit of his fellow man. You appear to be one of those knobbers who just want to argue and protest for the sake of it. No matter what the political/financial set up, I reckon you'd find a way to argue about how wrong it all is. For the record you spastic, the banks frequently create money, i.e credit out of nothing.
@w0y1z92753 Any intelligent individual that visits my channel will see your simply incorrect . Banks DON'T create money WE DO , we are even the true creditors who gives up property from the out set of the obligors promissory note, Banks are money changers that launder principal on conception OUT OF CIRCULATION BEFORE the fraudulent exchange then again after the exchange by charged interest thats NEVER CREATED nor ISSUED .bank money is merely EVIDENCE of our promissory obligations to each other .
@chotaboy66 Yes, any intelligent individual will probably laugh at the fact you've spent the majority of this thread worrying about whether or not it's a ponzie scheme or not. Rather than acknowledging what ever it is that you want to call it - the current banking set up is a crooked, and corrupt scheme aimed at robbing citizens of their wealth.
You're still yet to answer my question - what then, would you have replace the banks?
@chotaboy66 As for who gains in the destruction of currency, I'm with you on that one. It's designed to benefit the 'elites' of the world. What they actually get out of it, I'm not sure. As I believe that once peoples stomaches begin to rumble, a sleeping giant will awaken. Well, at least I live in hope.
I think you may have misunderstood my statement about banks being essential. The system still needs to be overhauled to take away their ability to rig the game.
@w0y1z92753 The evidence is clear we suffer from mass Circulatory deflation due to the obfuscation of our promissory obligations" ground floor " perpetrated by all commercial banks & we also suffer the manifestation of price inflation which is primarily caused on a whole by charged interest thats never created nor issued sir. Theres 2 types of inflation ,circulatory & price inflation ,There are isolated exceptions of course for price inflation on certain products by they're supply & demand.
@w0y1z92753 Indeed if we are to prove monetary destruction in a court by only assuming money is created out of nothing & all it represents by definition is a ponzi scheme would be preposterous to say the least, what has to be established is mathematical proof of failure that indeed dose exist showing us a theft has accrued prior to the fraudulent exchange evident of a magnitude that far exceeds any rate of national debt injection's which are only mere attempts to keep the circulation vital .
@chotaboy66 On the subject of banks; They are an essential part of the business cycle. However, what needs to be removed is the ability to practice reserve fractional banking and the creation of hard currency via the RBA. They and the other corporations for that matter should also receive no special treatment from the government.
Should they be allowed to operate under the same rules as every other member of society and businesses within that society, I have no problem with their existence.
@w0y1z92753 banks; They are an essential part of the business cycle.
-
How are why banks are a essential part of the business cycle when they intervene on our commerce by fraud before the fraudulent exchange which is before issuance even before expansion . Do banks really create money on conception or do they merely change money ?
Is factional expansion the creation or is it a purported borrower or rather correctly speaking the obligors signature on a promissory note actual true creation.
@w0y1z92753 To see the root cause of monetary destruction is to see the obfuscation of our promissory obligations to each other before the fraudulent exchange which is the creation of principal, failing this one only concludes incorrectly that banks creates or loans money .The truth is that there is no loan or debt to begin with rather the obligor creates all principal & its the obligors obligation to PAY DOWN & retire the creation from circulation over time to defeat circulatory inflation .
I want to make this clear this video is only a indication of Australia's real debt , I do not condone Lyndon Larouche solution primarily because he supports commercial banks that keep principal and charge terminal interest which is the root cause of our money obfuscation today. Regulation can only temper a inherently terminal process.
A CEO of a my old company tried that trick with Trade finance. When the Trade Finance became due he produced false reports to obtain more trade finance to pay off the old. this went on until the bank stepped in and made the company insolvent. Interesting to see this is the same game they are playing with the IMF. Reality is, at the interest rates charged the debt cannot be paid off. The IMF intended this when the loans were created in order that we would comply to the IMF's 1 world currency.
@MrRodeoblue I couldn't agree more but such bold moves by past presidents and prime ministers of other countries has resulted in assassination. We are the only power of hope for our country and it's not as 1 lone ranting lunatic but rather a united people. Statics report it only takes 18% of the population united to over throw a government. I think with the current state of confusion most people could agree that abolishing our current system would be beneficial to all.
He ends with 'debt free money is the answer'? Because my mate Chota probably watched 'The secrete of Oz' (gotta love torrents) and knows a thing or two about how to save us all.
You can write off debt its called declaring your bankrupt. Or prove that debt didn't exist in the first place ,If one understands fraction reserve banking and how credit is generated one will fully understand how this credit works.
@PedroArvy yeh, you rent out your armed forces to countrys that need it..., say for instance to Saudi Arabia, then the Saudi oil wealth expands and relieve the yanks of some of there debt.....
In the words of Gerald Celente: "The mafia, excuse me banks, need to keep the ponzie scheme going!"
The only way to save the financial future of the country is to tell the RBA and the rest of the central banks/international mafia to go fuck themselves.
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 I agree with your conclusion in part ,actually we should remove all banks not just the central banks ,,,but is it a really " ponzie scheme" by definition ?
chotaboy66 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 You think the banks who are giving the credit at all levels are not aware that much of the owed money is continually rolled over? It's a fraudulent pracitce IMO. I'd also argue that the issuance of currency by the RBA is fraudulent - creating nothing out of nothing and expecting something in return. Paper money backed by nothing is... nothing. Yet, we owe them something substantial in return. The cycle continues. So yes it's a ponzie scheme.
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 Is your promise of labor nothing ? backed by the property value in question which is redeemable,The definition of a ponzi scheme means investors that stand to gain invest they're own money ? Do banks offer any consideration of value of they're own ? do they loan they're own money that represents anything of value ? Who then is the winner at the end of monetary destruction? indeed there is no winner even the few at the top that ONLY gain temporally will loose it all ultimately SIR.
chotaboy66 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 Well, actually when I talked about the creation of paper money backed by nothing... that is exactly what I meant. The RBA just conjures money. It doesn't make an equal aquisition of something substantial such as an equivalent amount of gold. It just conjures that money. Fractional reserve banking is then on practiced onto us by the banks who also loan us money that doesn't exist. I then stated we owe them something substantial in return - Labor, property, other resources.
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 Fractional multiplication is NOT creation rather is a expansion that multiplies DOWN eventually NOT UP. Creation is by the obligors promissory note signature sir which has the only lawful consideration of value backed by the property value in question thats a liability, financial instrument deposited in the bank.The bank then launders this from circulation by fraud before the fraudulent exchange. The only way to continue expansion is by one of us signing another promissory note sir.
chotaboy66 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 Sounds to me like you're arguing in favor of the banking instutions. If that's the case you can suck my cock.
BTW, If you were (as your vids appear to suggest) trying to educate and enlighten people to the fraudulent practices of the Central banking system, it might be a more effective tactic to not type so condecendingly. Lol, getting wound up over my use of the word 'ponzie' instead of worring about the bigger issue at hand, is well a tad silly.
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 Your assumptions are simply incorrect why? I advocate the eradication of all banks completely with a solution, for all of us to understand SOLUTION we must first comprehend how we are getting screwed EXACTLY ,Simply parroting "ponsi scheme ","money created out of air" divides us further,WHY? Because its simply not true ,instead of jumping to illogical assumptions & telling me to suck your cock get your facts correct before you lay claim to know what your talking about OK MATE.
chotaboy66 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 Assumptions are incorrect? I suppose you better tell Gerald Celente and Max Keiser that their assumptions are wrong too. Frequently they refer to the current setups as 'ponzie schemes'.
Getting rid of all banks? Yeah, that would work... not. Where are people supposed to put their money? Under their mattress? Where is credit supposed to come from? Even in your constitution for dummies vid there is an acknowledgement of the need for 'debt free credit'.
Jeez, you're a bright one.
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 Assumptions are incorrect? I suppose you better tell Gerald Celente and Max Keiser that their assumptions are wrong too. Frequently they refer to the current setups as 'ponzie schemes'.
--
We have & we are meet with evasion BANKS DON'T INVEST THERE OWN MONEY what don't you get ? To say the banking system is a ponsi scheme is to claim one hasn't a clue where the root cause of monetary destruction STARTS ,Do these jokers have proof of solution or do they point you to the symptoms?
chotaboy66 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 Of course they don't you moron, they create money out of 'fresh air'. They don't need to invest their own money they lend it out en mass, knowing that the majority is going to be fraudulently 'rolled over' as is discussed in your vid. Perhaps you should watch and listen again. Carefully!
Regardless it's a mute point. Who fucking cares if it's a ponzie scheme or not - to get hung up on that point is, quite simply retarded.
I'd love to hear what you think should replace banks.
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 Money is NOT created as debt ,its created by the purported borrower only the borrower is NOT borrowing rather the borrower is the obligor who creates principal only & its the obligors obligation to PAY DOWN & retire the creation over time to defeat circulatory inflation,Only the BANK claims falsely to be the true creditor ,the bank doesn't retire the obligors payments THEY STEAL THEM which causes the opposite endless MASS circulatory deflation ,& THIS IS THE CAUSE OF NATIONAL DEBT
chotaboy66 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 Whatever, I actually like a lot of your videos. But as far as I'm concerned your a tool, and you can fuck off. If talking shit - which is exactly what you have produced in your last few *cough* retorts makes you feel special or something, well continue. I just won't be paying any attention.
When you borrow money from a bank - the bank 'credits' your account. It's credited it with money that doesn't exist physically. Therefore, it's created it.
But like I said, you can fuck off.
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 One more name call OR telling me to fuck off I will block you MATE, I'm a patient & fair bloke so I'm only giving you a fair warning OK.
chotaboy66 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 Ohhhh no, please anything but that. The big bad man will block me.
Go for your life, I seriously don't give a fuck.
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 No sir I will be only blocking your EGO calling me names which is really childish isn't it .
I don't proclaim to be big nor bad YOU DO just read what your writing its really sad .I'm only trying to help people thats all .
chotaboy66 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 Oh yeah, helping people - By what not offering a real solution? Harping on whether or not something is a ponzie scheme or not, when there are much larger, more substantial questions to be asked on this subject? Yeah, you're a great help to people. My original suspicion that you're one of those argumentative types that just want's to protest and argue over anything, rather than fixing something that's broken and will benefit his fellow man.
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 My original suspicion that you're one of those argumentative types that just want's to protest and argue over anything, rather than fixing something that's broken and will benefit his fellow man.
--
ARE YOU PARANOID MATE , why fix something thats broken only to have it screw us again when you can replace it completely . Where in the hell is your logic man?
chotaboy66 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 Lol, thanks for valitdating my statement from above. - Fix/Change Yeah, you're not in the mood to troll are you.
Fuck off and die you piece of shit.
That should be sufficient to get myself blocked, as I don't plan on debating bullshit with you anymore.
Nice one fuckhead, you may have turned someone to your way of thinking... now you've just added to the obviously long list of people who regard you as a douchebag.
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 Blocked you chose so blocked you are.
chotaboy66 7 months ago
You're still yet to answer my question - what then, would you have replace the banks?
--
If you did INDEED click on my name & visit my channel like you claim you have you will see banks will be replaced with a National NON PROFIT Accounting Common monetary foundry (CMF) established by the people for the people ,credit/money will be created & issued by the people themselves via promissory obligations with NO INTEREST attached based on a simple 1.1.1 ratio.
chotaboy66 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 At no point did I ever say I clicked your name, and looked at your channel. I said 'I like your vids'. Which, I do. I watched the Australian Constitution for dummies among others. Are you new to youtube? You don't need to click on someones channel to watch their vids.
It's a bit hard to get away with twisting the truth, considering every word I typed is here, in black and white.
CMFs are essentially still banks, no matter what you call them.
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 CMFs are essentially still banks, no matter what you call them.
--
PROVE IT MATE? How then do you compare a NON PROFIT monetary foundry that doesn't launder principal & interest out of circulation to a bank that dose . The CMF Is merely accounting that preservers your right & ability to create money & retire money nothing more . NO DEBT , NO LOAN ,
chotaboy66 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 Although, I do agree a CMF or monetary institution that loans at cost and not for profit is a great idea. However, you could have said that about 100 posts ago when I originally asked you what you would replace banks with when you stated you wanted to abolish the banks.
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 Besides mate, rather than getting all holier than thou, you might swing more people to your way of thinking if you weren't so condecending when someone has a view that isn't 100% to your liking. Things change when you get people on board, not when you alienate them.
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 Then again, it's becoming clear to me, that you're not one of those people who wants to change a crooked system for the benefit of his fellow man. You appear to be one of those knobbers who just want to argue and protest for the sake of it. No matter what the political/financial set up, I reckon you'd find a way to argue about how wrong it all is. For the record you spastic, the banks frequently create money, i.e credit out of nothing.
Again, if that's the case you can suck my cock
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 Any intelligent individual that visits my channel will see your simply incorrect . Banks DON'T create money WE DO , we are even the true creditors who gives up property from the out set of the obligors promissory note, Banks are money changers that launder principal on conception OUT OF CIRCULATION BEFORE the fraudulent exchange then again after the exchange by charged interest thats NEVER CREATED nor ISSUED .bank money is merely EVIDENCE of our promissory obligations to each other .
chotaboy66 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 Yes, any intelligent individual will probably laugh at the fact you've spent the majority of this thread worrying about whether or not it's a ponzie scheme or not. Rather than acknowledging what ever it is that you want to call it - the current banking set up is a crooked, and corrupt scheme aimed at robbing citizens of their wealth.
You're still yet to answer my question - what then, would you have replace the banks?
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 As for who gains in the destruction of currency, I'm with you on that one. It's designed to benefit the 'elites' of the world. What they actually get out of it, I'm not sure. As I believe that once peoples stomaches begin to rumble, a sleeping giant will awaken. Well, at least I live in hope.
I think you may have misunderstood my statement about banks being essential. The system still needs to be overhauled to take away their ability to rig the game.
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 The evidence is clear we suffer from mass Circulatory deflation due to the obfuscation of our promissory obligations" ground floor " perpetrated by all commercial banks & we also suffer the manifestation of price inflation which is primarily caused on a whole by charged interest thats never created nor issued sir. Theres 2 types of inflation ,circulatory & price inflation ,There are isolated exceptions of course for price inflation on certain products by they're supply & demand.
chotaboy66 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 Indeed if we are to prove monetary destruction in a court by only assuming money is created out of nothing & all it represents by definition is a ponzi scheme would be preposterous to say the least, what has to be established is mathematical proof of failure that indeed dose exist showing us a theft has accrued prior to the fraudulent exchange evident of a magnitude that far exceeds any rate of national debt injection's which are only mere attempts to keep the circulation vital .
chotaboy66 7 months ago
@chotaboy66 On the subject of banks; They are an essential part of the business cycle. However, what needs to be removed is the ability to practice reserve fractional banking and the creation of hard currency via the RBA. They and the other corporations for that matter should also receive no special treatment from the government.
Should they be allowed to operate under the same rules as every other member of society and businesses within that society, I have no problem with their existence.
w0y1z92753 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 banks; They are an essential part of the business cycle.
-
How are why banks are a essential part of the business cycle when they intervene on our commerce by fraud before the fraudulent exchange which is before issuance even before expansion . Do banks really create money on conception or do they merely change money ?
Is factional expansion the creation or is it a purported borrower or rather correctly speaking the obligors signature on a promissory note actual true creation.
chotaboy66 7 months ago
@w0y1z92753 To see the root cause of monetary destruction is to see the obfuscation of our promissory obligations to each other before the fraudulent exchange which is the creation of principal, failing this one only concludes incorrectly that banks creates or loans money .The truth is that there is no loan or debt to begin with rather the obligor creates all principal & its the obligors obligation to PAY DOWN & retire the creation from circulation over time to defeat circulatory inflation .
chotaboy66 7 months ago
I want to make this clear this video is only a indication of Australia's real debt , I do not condone Lyndon Larouche solution primarily because he supports commercial banks that keep principal and charge terminal interest which is the root cause of our money obfuscation today. Regulation can only temper a inherently terminal process.
chotaboy66 1 year ago
A CEO of a my old company tried that trick with Trade finance. When the Trade Finance became due he produced false reports to obtain more trade finance to pay off the old. this went on until the bank stepped in and made the company insolvent. Interesting to see this is the same game they are playing with the IMF. Reality is, at the interest rates charged the debt cannot be paid off. The IMF intended this when the loans were created in order that we would comply to the IMF's 1 world currency.
chrisnorman83 1 year ago
Comment removed
chrisnorman83 1 year ago
Australia should put up an iron curtain print its own money and drop all treaties. Australia can and should be self sufficient .
MrRodeoblue 1 year ago
@MrRodeoblue I couldn't agree more but such bold moves by past presidents and prime ministers of other countries has resulted in assassination. We are the only power of hope for our country and it's not as 1 lone ranting lunatic but rather a united people. Statics report it only takes 18% of the population united to over throw a government. I think with the current state of confusion most people could agree that abolishing our current system would be beneficial to all.
chrisnorman83 1 year ago
He ends with 'debt free money is the answer'? Because my mate Chota probably watched 'The secrete of Oz' (gotta love torrents) and knows a thing or two about how to save us all.
OzzyPatriot 1 year ago
@OzzyPatriot Why thank you Oz , lets not forget yourself as you indeed have a vast knowledge of a thing or three also mate.
chotaboy66 1 year ago
You can write off debt its called declaring your bankrupt. Or prove that debt didn't exist in the first place ,If one understands fraction reserve banking and how credit is generated one will fully understand how this credit works.
chotaboy66 1 year ago
excellent video but i dont know about debs if you owe money you to pay back sometime but you cant rwrite off debts
ausguy1975 1 year ago
O Caçador de Bandidos
GloboManchete 1 year ago
Is there any historical precedent for writing off huge foreign debts? This seems unbelievable to me.
I cant imagine China saying:
Hey, you know that 100 billion you owe us, forget about it, things will be better if we wipe it out
It might solve the problem but is there any likelihood this will happen?
PedroArvy 2 years ago
There is a goverment link top right under the heading .
Australian FOREIGN debt has increased in both liberal and labors watch.
You also might want to see my channel playlist " Australian Constitution for dummies " And have a good look.
chotaboy66 2 years ago
@PedroArvy yeh, you rent out your armed forces to countrys that need it..., say for instance to Saudi Arabia, then the Saudi oil wealth expands and relieve the yanks of some of there debt.....
NickAAylward 1 year ago
If only they chose Ron Paul...
saintfletcher 2 years ago
gov debt engineered by big banks?
starting to look that way
gwald 2 years ago