Yes the constitution gives you the right to peaceable assembly, but if your protest is disruptive to the event that you are protesting it is no longer a "peaceful" assembly and therefore you are no longer protected by the constitution.
I might be the only one here thinking this, but America is definetely a very stupid country. Or at least the people are. I just hope America straightens up before my kids have to walk it's streets. I'd hate for them to see a maniac reading the constitution while getting arrested by a cop taking him serious enough to arrest him for it. Actualy, that might be a funny thing to see, as I laugh at this video while that very thing happens. Except they weren't reading during the arrest.
the problem with this video is just how uneducated the american people are with law. Police work under criminal law which operates globally under the Uniform Commercial Code. Which is the law of the sea, not the law of the land, which is civil law which is civil court. The constitution has no bearing on criminal law and the U.C.C. only on civil law. and under more investigation that the american citizens arent "we the people" reference the "Act of 1871"
Seems to the rest of the world that you American sheeple have already lost your freedom and all you do is talk about it on you tube! TAKE ACTION! POWER TO THE PEOPLE! If you tolerate this, then your children (and the rest of the world) will be next! YOU are the ones ushering in the police state by your NON-ACTION!
I have to agree with you. At least countries like France and others fight back. Us American Sheeple sit back and actually allow this nation to become a police state... People are so oblivious as to what is going on around them and in front of their own eyes.
Americans are beautiful and strong people...as a proud Canadian, I have always admired my neighbors but i say, stand up to your corrupt government and refuse to buckle to the evil intentions indited by such a paralyzing aspect of an otherwise wonderful nation! By the way, Bush eats cock!
I'm a Canadian who believes in free speech and for the rights of the people for the people. Sadly Canada is also starting to show signs of an emerging police state. All governments around the world are corrupt war hungry Facists. SoFUCK THE NEW WORLD ORDER.There is no hope in socialism it never works just look what happened to the Soviet Union. Socialism and Communism never works.
I Agree those pigs should get the shit kicked out of them for hurting and molesting children and killing the people they were sworn to proctect. When I was a kid cops were not the heartless bastard cop nowadays.
america=25% of worlds prison population (not including the off-shore prisons...)
+ we have thousands of fema prisons in the u.s.that are un populated by prisoners but fully staffed with guards... millions of germans didn't even know that consetration camps existed untill after the slaughter... dont repeat history people...
simponsucks201, in serbia you won't get Arrested for expressing your Constitutional rights ! you get only arrested when you piss of the police with guns ! then you can run like hell :p serbian police are brutal ! and wont treat you like in usa ! just as long as you stay below in middle of the law anything above will result in a arrest
This seems to be popping up more and more. There were two guys given permission to walk on a public side walk and hand our bibles. Then two policemen who disagreed with it, came up and arrested one of them and without reading them their rights.
They do not have to read you your rights anymore. Only if you are under custodial interogation. Just before they interogate you is when they have to read your rights. They did away with reading your rights durring an arrest.
The reason that they did away with reading your rights during an arrest is because it was too much of a burden on the average patroleman who neither understood them or could remember them. The standard for being an officer is so low now, that is why we have nothing but moron police that commit rights violations at a drop of a hat. They are just exceedingly ignorant. Not all, I have met a few police that were savy, but far too many are not.
jedipauly ( "custodial interogation. " you know the problems with you americans. you invent new words to old meanings ! thats the real problem, like this WTF is this custodial for years i've read english and i dont think i came accross this word ever.
This is an English Common Law term that is at least 200 years earlier then America. I did not invent anything. This has nothing to do with Americans and their problems! I am sure that whatever nationality you are you are not perfect and have problems. I suggest you go to a Legal Reference Web page and do a search on this "Legal" definition which is not in common spoken or written English, instead of attempting to insult me! Take responsibility and educate yourself and grow up already!
I wonder when the CIA will put "Theocratic police state" in their The World Factbook under government type for the US, instead of the "Constitution-based federal republic; strong democratic tradition" bullshit. :D
Hey - that's great. A video of someone getting arrested for... I have no idea what. You might have titled this "Arrested for Killing Someone" or "Arrested for Eating Dessert"
There is in fact an old court ruling that you in fact have the right to defend yourself, even with a deadly outcome, if police are unlawfully assaulting you or trying to arrest you and stuff...
"Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary." Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529.
"One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance." (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
"Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense." (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
"An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery." (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
"These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence." Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
"When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified." Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.
Yes the constitution gives you the right to peaceable assembly, but if your protest is disruptive to the event that you are protesting it is no longer a "peaceful" assembly and therefore you are no longer protected by the constitution.
Minatorous 7 months ago
I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
~Voltaire
Also
DEATH TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER AND THOSE WHO WANT IT.
narukofan2 10 months ago
All we see is someone being arrested. Where is the other 5 to 10 minutes before the arrests that show us what they were doing?
NETWizzJbirk 11 months ago
i always side with old hippie women with upside down visors. They're so cute!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! thumbs up if you like upside down visors!!!!!!!!!!!!
BlackDongs2Dextreme 1 year ago
im 10, but this is outrageous.
I'm learning about the bill of rights currently, and isnt that Disobeying the First amendment? [Freedom of Speech, press, religion]
This is completely insane. They are free to FREE SPEECH!!
Wtf!! i say those cops broke the 5th amendment [i think]
--[no punishment should be cruel]-- (i think) :P
But still, they broke the amendment, so shouldn't THEY be arrested??
O_o
BuffleMuffle 1 year ago
That is why the forefathers gave us a Second Amendment,To protect us against Government.
SmokeBojangles 1 year ago
I might be the only one here thinking this, but America is definetely a very stupid country. Or at least the people are. I just hope America straightens up before my kids have to walk it's streets. I'd hate for them to see a maniac reading the constitution while getting arrested by a cop taking him serious enough to arrest him for it. Actualy, that might be a funny thing to see, as I laugh at this video while that very thing happens. Except they weren't reading during the arrest.
JoeTheAgnosticOneCT 1 year ago
@JoeTheAgnosticOneCT - Do everyone a favor Joe, don't procreate...
broadjumper1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We're under dictatorial police state!
American ... destroyed by design! We sick and tired of tyranny!
Give us back our republic!
TheDrkKnght1988 1 year ago
i thought this was america, apparently it's a communist state!
nashvillian615 1 year ago
i feel bad for those poor cops who cant think for themselves
carbonation28 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheDrkKnght1988 2 years ago
I agree. All the government is run by facist devil worshiping child molesters who only care about money,greed for war and are nazi like assholes.
narukofan2 2 years ago
@TheDrkKnght1988 what is the american dream?
giglyboyo 1 year ago
the problem with this video is just how uneducated the american people are with law. Police work under criminal law which operates globally under the Uniform Commercial Code. Which is the law of the sea, not the law of the land, which is civil law which is civil court. The constitution has no bearing on criminal law and the U.C.C. only on civil law. and under more investigation that the american citizens arent "we the people" reference the "Act of 1871"
lakoncers13 2 years ago
Seems to the rest of the world that you American sheeple have already lost your freedom and all you do is talk about it on you tube! TAKE ACTION! POWER TO THE PEOPLE! If you tolerate this, then your children (and the rest of the world) will be next! YOU are the ones ushering in the police state by your NON-ACTION!
wilma111 3 years ago 7
I have to agree with you. At least countries like France and others fight back. Us American Sheeple sit back and actually allow this nation to become a police state... People are so oblivious as to what is going on around them and in front of their own eyes.
Aphesia 2 years ago
Americans are beautiful and strong people...as a proud Canadian, I have always admired my neighbors but i say, stand up to your corrupt government and refuse to buckle to the evil intentions indited by such a paralyzing aspect of an otherwise wonderful nation! By the way, Bush eats cock!
massterra 3 years ago 3
I'm a Canadian who believes in free speech and for the rights of the people for the people. Sadly Canada is also starting to show signs of an emerging police state. All governments around the world are corrupt war hungry Facists. SoFUCK THE NEW WORLD ORDER.There is no hope in socialism it never works just look what happened to the Soviet Union. Socialism and Communism never works.
narukofan2 2 years ago
Citizens of the united states we need to stand up an fight back for our rights remember you are the patriots an our time is now
Idletukeepme4ever 3 years ago
I Agree with you 100%
narukofan2 2 years ago
cops are brainswashed
daniellewalker78 3 years ago
I Agree those pigs should get the shit kicked out of them for hurting and molesting children and killing the people they were sworn to proctect. When I was a kid cops were not the heartless bastard cop nowadays.
narukofan2 2 years ago
america=5% of worlds population
america=25% of worlds prison population (not including the off-shore prisons...)
+ we have thousands of fema prisons in the u.s.that are un populated by prisoners but fully staffed with guards... millions of germans didn't even know that consetration camps existed untill after the slaughter... dont repeat history people...
survival12345 3 years ago
usa is fucked up, come to serbia ! freedom where it belongs !
msdnvp 4 years ago
Are u sure it is peaceful?
simponsucks201 3 years ago
simponsucks201, in serbia you won't get Arrested for expressing your Constitutional rights ! you get only arrested when you piss of the police with guns ! then you can run like hell :p serbian police are brutal ! and wont treat you like in usa ! just as long as you stay below in middle of the law anything above will result in a arrest
msdnvp 3 years ago
if there was a way for me to get to Serbia =(
simponsucks201 3 years ago
This seems to be popping up more and more. There were two guys given permission to walk on a public side walk and hand our bibles. Then two policemen who disagreed with it, came up and arrested one of them and without reading them their rights.
joebrueske 4 years ago
They do not have to read you your rights anymore. Only if you are under custodial interogation. Just before they interogate you is when they have to read your rights. They did away with reading your rights durring an arrest.
jedipauly 3 years ago
Yeah, good-bye rights, hello Presidential power.
joebrueske 3 years ago
The reason that they did away with reading your rights during an arrest is because it was too much of a burden on the average patroleman who neither understood them or could remember them. The standard for being an officer is so low now, that is why we have nothing but moron police that commit rights violations at a drop of a hat. They are just exceedingly ignorant. Not all, I have met a few police that were savy, but far too many are not.
jedipauly 3 years ago
reminds me of the good 'ole dark ages where knights were nothing more than hoodlums with the right to weapons and armor.
joebrueske 3 years ago
jedipauly ( "custodial interogation. " you know the problems with you americans. you invent new words to old meanings ! thats the real problem, like this WTF is this custodial for years i've read english and i dont think i came accross this word ever.
msdnvp 3 years ago
This is an English Common Law term that is at least 200 years earlier then America. I did not invent anything. This has nothing to do with Americans and their problems! I am sure that whatever nationality you are you are not perfect and have problems. I suggest you go to a Legal Reference Web page and do a search on this "Legal" definition which is not in common spoken or written English, instead of attempting to insult me! Take responsibility and educate yourself and grow up already!
jedipauly 3 years ago
joebrueske hahaha godness american empire falling down ! cuz usa sold its soul to the devil !
msdnvp 3 years ago
I wonder when the CIA will put "Theocratic police state" in their The World Factbook under government type for the US, instead of the "Constitution-based federal republic; strong democratic tradition" bullshit. :D
Quasi84 4 years ago 2
Is there no follow-up to this? For example, whether charges were pressed, and then for what?
helgihg 4 years ago
If you want to have your Constitutional rights restored, vote for RON PAUL for President!
libertarian4322 4 years ago 11
ok RON PAUL!!!!!!!!
simponsucks201 3 years ago
Hey - that's great. A video of someone getting arrested for... I have no idea what. You might have titled this "Arrested for Killing Someone" or "Arrested for Eating Dessert"
czmzozrzi 4 years ago
you sure you werent just spamming nonsense?
ambientdiscord 4 years ago
Protect and Serve??
Leonard Peltier... how many years in prison for unlawful arrest.
For F**K sake wake up and resist...at some point before they were brainwashed and conditioned the police were human too? ...Maybe not now though eh??
walkingbear56 4 years ago
There is in fact an old court ruling that you in fact have the right to defend yourself, even with a deadly outcome, if police are unlawfully assaulting you or trying to arrest you and stuff...
Kenzofeis 4 years ago
we need an uprising and soon...faggot ass cops, they are all fucking pigs
atman009 4 years ago
does the owner of this video willing to let me download this and put it on my upcoming legalize freedom website?
krusekottonmouth 4 years ago
yes
WHYNotNews 4 years ago
Ron Paul is our only hope
911truthandjustice 4 years ago 2
911truthandjustice, 911 was a inside job, bush is the devil, usa empire is falling. and im jesus
msdnvp 3 years ago
you wish PAL!!!!!!!!
simponsucks201 3 years ago
re·pris·al /rɪˈpraɪzəl/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[ri-prahy-zuhl] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
--noun
1. (in warfare) retaliation against an enemy, for injuries received, by the infliction of equal or greater injuries.
2. an act or instance of retaliation.
3. the action or practice of using force, short of war, against another nation, to secure redress of a grievance.
4. the forcible seizure of property or subjects in retaliation.
knave2 4 years ago
Another reason to vote for Ron Paul.
Nicholai420 4 years ago
Was Ron Paul able to attend any of these speaking engagements? Has he commented on these demonstrations or arrests?
mystykit 4 years ago
"Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary." Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529.
7forward 4 years ago 3
"One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance." (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
7forward 4 years ago 3
"Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense." (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
7forward 4 years ago 3
"An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery." (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
7forward 4 years ago 3
"These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence." Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
7forward 4 years ago 3
"When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified." Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.
7forward 4 years ago 3
just shows where we are gooing as a country...
i do wish the video showed the reason why though...
mark1242 4 years ago