There are many reasons that this probably wouldn't work and I'm not a scientist but it seems like the sound barrier would pose a problem to tunnels thousands of metres under the ocean. The speed of sound is around 761mph, trains traveling at 5000mph would be constantly breaking the sound barrier causing sonic shockwaves in the tunnels. We have trouble creating structures which can stand undersea pressures under normal conditions, can't forsee a tunnel able to withstand sonic booms at 4miles deep
This tunnel, if constructed, would become obsolete by space travel. At least with space travel, one is not limited to travel to a single destination. Even if it takes a little longer to fly. The difference in timing would not be enough to justify almost doubling America's debt.
@W0Wman1 It was never suggested in this that the cost would solely by the US's to bare. Although a really cool idea, I doubt it would be built. Besides being too costly, it poses an enormous security issue. An enemy of any European nation or the US could attack this tunnel and destroy/make unusable a multi-trillion dollar investment. Fuel is going to be a major issue in the future which is the only reason why I could see this electrically powered train being made.
@Kleavers Yeah, as someone who lives in London, and whose family live in New York, this idea really got my attention. When you think about it, it's no less terrifying then getting on a hollow metal tube and flying through the air thousands of feet above the ocean.
The only thing I wonder is, there's still so much we don't know about the ocean. What would they do if a herd of whales swam into it? Plus this thing would be number one target on every terrorist's hit list.
People said that the chunnel tunnel would never happen, but decades later France and England goverment prove them wrong, we have trains traveling to and from London to Paris every minute and it only take 2 hrs 15 min. As an none keen flyer, Travelling to France on a plane, take two hours to check in and go through security checks before getting on the plane, so why wouldnt this be possible to build an transatlantic tunnel across the Atlantic. i wouldnt mind traveling on it.
It makes more sense to build one across the Bering Strait. Sure, for time sake one across the Atlantic makes sense, but for 'get it done sooner than later' Bering Strait all the way.
this is the stupidest idea i hv ever heard... have u hear anything tt can travel 5000 miles an hour tt is commercially available??? the main problem is to find the vehicle and not the build the tunnel...
@coconutesther instead of using your teenage brain to come up with a solution, the other videos will explain that removing air resistance in a tunnel and putting maglev trains in it can have a huge speed potential. The train solution was perfected years ago, now they need to find a tunnel that can stretch out as far as the Atlantic ocean that is capable of harboring the tracks and trains and withstand any accidents.
All it takes is a fire, an accident and the whole damn thing would become useless for months. Imagine being trapped under water for hours while waiting for rescue teams to reach you! glub, glub, glub....oxygen please....
If the tunnel is airless, then it must be sealed tight, making it even more difficult to operate since passengers have to breath. Furthermore, the outside pressure is even more intense against the inner tube. Technically, it is possible to build it, but practicality, it will never be built.
@Nathan173AB exactly theres not enough people that have heard of the venus project, money is the true enemy and barrier to mankind achieving all that he could be
Its a pretty awesome idea, unfortunately the recoup would be almost impossible on this. Combine that with the fact that only a certain minority of people would actually have to use the thing with any regularity and it becomes the Concorde part Deux, except its a high speed train in a tunnel traveling below the ocean surface. Forget about rescue operations due to failure.
@jimmywrangles the world's GDP is around 65-70 trillion, we only need a couple billion people to starve to death then we'll have a tunnel that can move around (taking into estimation average 1000 people per train, 1 train per 2mins, a very bold estimate) 700,000 people moving back and forth in the tunnel per day, assuming the trains runs at peak capacity all day and with no gaps between trains. 200,000 is more likely . we'll also need to nuke all the whales in that ocean to protect the tunnel.
I will never ttravel in this either the bering strait is frikin scary anything could happend and I agreeeeeeeee a lot with @0519075130 people are mean they create things for a reason then what?? by the way build by human means is not perfect!
This is a fairly reasonable idea due to the fact that we could transport goods,fiber optic Internet and passengers at alarming speeds all over the world using the already existing train networks. This would revolutionize the way we live our lives and would produce thousands of jobs for many years and is good for the environment. The only issue is the initial and sustaining costs. I estimate the project to take about 30-70 years to complete so most of us will be fairly old or dead by the time th
This internet has probably rendered this project obsolete, but undoubtedly it could be done. It could be done well and without it being a drain on the rest of the world. We have the means, we just can't because of money. Just eliminate the middleman of money and it'll be well within reach.
The idea that you could live on one side and work on the other is fantasy. Not because you couldnt travel but the cost of such a trip everyday would bankrupt you within a week.
Planes cost £300-£500 a ticket right now. And they dont cost that much to build and while fuel is expensive it still doesnt scratch the service for how much the tunnel will cost to run.
It's a great idea if the countries that build it decide to take a huge LOSS per ticket
tired of trying to smuggle yourself in a container or behind the wheels of a truck.. take the train... transatlantic tunnel.. immigration... made easy ; ]
There are already secret undergroung military bases in the U.S . The U.S government have already got these technology's but are slowly wiring them out to the public.
Funny how our world in the last 60 years has evoled rapidly technology wise without us being told 100% on how we really got and new certain thing we just get convincing false stories. we will have this train one day but we will have lots of more things before that to make it possible to develop this.
Well...The cost of this system would be trivial for China since it has over 2 trillion USD in forex reserves...but it would matter what they would be able to gain from such an investment..maybe rather geostrategical.
@andreastroelsgaard costs would be very high for this tunnel as well. When you consider the deficit the design teams and the investors would have to recover from, including construction, maintenance, anti-terrorist security, and resource usage, the ticket would be a lot more than $10K I assure you.
@ishotu747 I would imagine that this tunnel could be used for freight if magnetic levitation for freight is developed. Passenger travel would be expensive at first as it needs to be paid off. A £1,000 from London to New York is still cheaper than Concorde was.
I like the idea in the ET3 video. A cross of tubes through the US, and a tube that runs all the way up through Alaska, across the Bering Strait, down through India, and all the way through Europe to London. It'd hit more places and likely be cheaper, quicker, and easier to construct.
New development: China are currently working on the Vacuum Trains being discussed in this documentary. Find out more in this fascinating article on high speed rail: ceasefiremagazine. co . uk/2010/09/science-china-train/
The best route would be to go up Alaska to Russia Across Asia and Europe to England and THEN build a tunnel like this to link it back again. It's completely achievable and possibly economical to build the tunnel this way.
I fear today people are getting too used to the status quo and don't want change that improves our lives. Some risk is GOOD!
Cool Idea. But not gonna happen I don't think. Look at Amtrak in America!! Bankrupt, low ridership. I don't know that there is political will to force the idea and fund the project.
Now this would be some feat, it will never happen tho, 2 trillion i can put that money to better use why not put that back into the economy and shut up whining about the deficit. Or maybe use that to pay the finance charge? Ha Ha idiots oooh the transparency.
@0519075130 I doubt it would middleesterners, considering that muslims believe knowlodge is the key and one is always a student of life. If anyone were to "destroy" the tunnel it would be the militant jews and christains saying it defies laws of god.
My opinion, i believe air travel is still the fastest least expensive and most effictive method to travel cross atlantic. If you build a tunnel you would spend a lot of investment just doing the research plus building the tunnel will cost another billion or even trillions of dolloars and also you need to consider mechanical problems in the future as the ocean is actually widening each year and lots more issues etc.
Never say never m-eight.... A hundred years ago no one would have thought that within seconds you could order naked women from all around the world to appear on your desk. And in high quality!!!! :D
Not possible. You see, the Atlantic Ocean is actually widening. A tunnel across the Atlantic Ocean would not be able to lengthen with the spreading of the sea floor at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
the transatlantic tunnel has very little actual utility... it would be far better, less expensive, easier, and just as fast to just fly in space planes. The two engineering projects for Tokyo are way better. The sky city and the pyramid city have far more utility
Why don't they instead of building a tunle create a train that is capeable of travalinh underwater. A very streamlined nose a maglev perhaps. Less moving parts. With emergency explosive that would blow the clamps on the tracks if somthing went wrong and allow the train to float to the surface.
@cprich22 Because with the water resistance it will travel at most 50 mph. We already have submarines and they are not very fast. Water is much thicker than air see.
I think this will happen. A vacuum tunnel Maglev powered by electricity traveling at 5,000 mph? That would get enormous ridership. Chances are the benifits would outweigh the costs over time. Obviously this wouldn't be a government project, a private company would do everything.
Although I think this is awesome. I think it may be impossible. 1. Tectonic shifts would mean the tunnel would have to be lengthened over time. 2. The $Trillion+ pricetag would mean it would take forever to be profitable. 3. Any country or entity that gets into a conflict with the US/UK could drop a bomb on it in the ocean and pretty much destroy a centuries worth of work. The vacuum in the tunnel would allow the water to rush in so fast it would strip the tunnel inside. Cool idea though.
Still, it seems to me that a supersonic aeroplane is more efficient than this tunnel. Capital costs are much less and we know that it works perfectly well.
Because it costs so much, it would have to be thousands of dollars for people to use it. Its a crap idea. It would be cheaper to just improve aircraft.
For how long do you think airplane can serve people from/to North and South America and Europe? 60 years? What after oil? What kind of transportation you will use similar speed to airplane!!!????
Do you think that can use a plane in 2099 After oil?
I agree. Peak oil is expected to be reached around 2040, perhaps earlier. This is an electric Magnetic Levitation Train that would obviously be owned and operated by a private company (there's no way taxes would be used for this). This isn't just wanted, it's NEEDED.
did you just watch this program. it takes an hour u nonce! listen to what their telling you. i hope you arnt in the construction industry. god help us all
This Engineering idea is possible, but I don't believe its the best idea in this world's current economic state. We could use those 3 trillion for something else. Such as health care, poverty, etc.
look health care and poverty problems will always be around. they have their up and downs. Every person should work hard to make their own money and take care of themselves. If companies or the government wants to do a project that is better for everyone to travel, why should they pay that money to some lazy person that can't even take care of their own health needs. I'm not saying we should leave them to die, we should only help people with extreme needs, or handicap people.
some people in other countries don't get an opportunity to have an education let alone go to collage and get a job, how are they supposed to get money?
well, what does that have to do with the construction of this tunnel that will make life better for potentially billions of people around the world, and generations to come. People having problems should stand up for themselves, change their political system, and government, move out to a better country, many options are available, but all i'm saying is that we should give up on ideas like that just to put that money towards paying for health care, or poverty of a selected people.
12 trillion dollars? molecular transportations would be a cheaper option i guess :)
xLoB63x 15 hours ago
live on one side and work on the other? Bollocks. The price of a return ticket would be ridiculous.
seb23490 2 days ago
how about we make faster planes and ditch the tunnel idea?
avidas2000 5 days ago
i got a solution for transatlantic travel. airplanes.
avidas2000 5 days ago
love the video man
ericajjful 1 week ago
@marinesallday It's designed to 'flex'
Seacadetguy 1 week ago
There are many reasons that this probably wouldn't work and I'm not a scientist but it seems like the sound barrier would pose a problem to tunnels thousands of metres under the ocean. The speed of sound is around 761mph, trains traveling at 5000mph would be constantly breaking the sound barrier causing sonic shockwaves in the tunnels. We have trouble creating structures which can stand undersea pressures under normal conditions, can't forsee a tunnel able to withstand sonic booms at 4miles deep
TimArmst 1 month ago in playlist More videos from dawnbeforedead
@TimArmst Well.. Hence that's why the tunnel would be in a vacum ;)
PtOs 3 weeks ago
@PtOs Yupp, commented before I watched the whole thing
TimArmst 3 weeks ago
This tunnel, if constructed, would become obsolete by space travel. At least with space travel, one is not limited to travel to a single destination. Even if it takes a little longer to fly. The difference in timing would not be enough to justify almost doubling America's debt.
W0Wman1 2 months ago
@W0Wman1 It was never suggested in this that the cost would solely by the US's to bare. Although a really cool idea, I doubt it would be built. Besides being too costly, it poses an enormous security issue. An enemy of any European nation or the US could attack this tunnel and destroy/make unusable a multi-trillion dollar investment. Fuel is going to be a major issue in the future which is the only reason why I could see this electrically powered train being made.
hop208 1 week ago
I don't know i will be alive by the time this happens. Lets see.
tigger7740 3 months ago
5000 miles/hr makes almost 1.5 mile per second so, the beginning of the movie showing 2 trains must be in a slow motion :):):)
KoziolekMatolek2010 4 months ago 2
Some projects are better off left undone & the Transatlantic Tunnel is one of them.
AmbushKillerWopper 4 months ago
I would totally go on this. I hate planes. This would only take an hour ffs!
Kleavers 4 months ago
@Kleavers Yeah, as someone who lives in London, and whose family live in New York, this idea really got my attention. When you think about it, it's no less terrifying then getting on a hollow metal tube and flying through the air thousands of feet above the ocean.
The only thing I wonder is, there's still so much we don't know about the ocean. What would they do if a herd of whales swam into it? Plus this thing would be number one target on every terrorist's hit list.
CinnabonChan 3 months ago
People said that the chunnel tunnel would never happen, but decades later France and England goverment prove them wrong, we have trains traveling to and from London to Paris every minute and it only take 2 hrs 15 min. As an none keen flyer, Travelling to France on a plane, take two hours to check in and go through security checks before getting on the plane, so why wouldnt this be possible to build an transatlantic tunnel across the Atlantic. i wouldnt mind traveling on it.
scottvideos100 4 months ago
lets stick to planes
santoyrayado 5 months ago
Err, the Altantic Ocean is still growing!! How the hell would this work?
Webofscience 5 months ago
It makes more sense to build one across the Bering Strait. Sure, for time sake one across the Atlantic makes sense, but for 'get it done sooner than later' Bering Strait all the way.
priusone 6 months ago
Teleporters - spend the moeny on that.
teafbut 6 months ago
this is the stupidest idea i hv ever heard... have u hear anything tt can travel 5000 miles an hour tt is commercially available??? the main problem is to find the vehicle and not the build the tunnel...
coconutesther 6 months ago
@coconutesther
If you watch the other videos you would have learned that a Maglev can travel at this speed if it's uncapped, and if everything is set up right.
America100000able 5 months ago
@coconutesther instead of using your teenage brain to come up with a solution, the other videos will explain that removing air resistance in a tunnel and putting maglev trains in it can have a huge speed potential. The train solution was perfected years ago, now they need to find a tunnel that can stretch out as far as the Atlantic ocean that is capable of harboring the tracks and trains and withstand any accidents.
propainish 5 months ago
Its good to have big visions. When humanity gets bored we can built this.
mo1elftausend 7 months ago
check out my blog, where I have written about this:
google my attempt at engineering in blogs
Dontbechattincrap 7 months ago
All it takes is a fire, an accident and the whole damn thing would become useless for months. Imagine being trapped under water for hours while waiting for rescue teams to reach you! glub, glub, glub....oxygen please....
MrVuHNguyen 7 months ago
@MrVuHNguyen
This tunnel is airless. Fire can't start without oxygen, and I am sure any train derailment at this speed would be fatal, and no one would survive.
America100000able 5 months ago
@America100000able
If the tunnel is airless, then it must be sealed tight, making it even more difficult to operate since passengers have to breath. Furthermore, the outside pressure is even more intense against the inner tube. Technically, it is possible to build it, but practicality, it will never be built.
MrVuHNguyen 5 months ago
@America100000able
That would be one interesting wreck though.
Kleavers 4 months ago
This helps deadly virus' spread faster into the population.
badwolf66 7 months ago in playlist Extreme Engineering - Transatlantic Tunnel
@badwolf66 bitch
MrEiriku 4 months ago
@MrEiriku Yeah...great response troll....
badwolf66 4 months ago
Like this if you're still watching this in 2011 :)
OfficialLM21 7 months ago 39
@OfficialLM21 I'm watching in 2012. your move.
Seacadetguy 1 week ago
Eliminate the artificial barrier of money, and it could be done. The Venus Project anyone?
Nathan173AB 8 months ago
@Nathan173AB exactly theres not enough people that have heard of the venus project, money is the true enemy and barrier to mankind achieving all that he could be
basswhore73 8 months ago
Its a pretty awesome idea, unfortunately the recoup would be almost impossible on this. Combine that with the fact that only a certain minority of people would actually have to use the thing with any regularity and it becomes the Concorde part Deux, except its a high speed train in a tunnel traveling below the ocean surface. Forget about rescue operations due to failure.
phuturephunk 8 months ago
train going 5000 miles per hour in year 2029... i want some of whatever those guys are smoking
penitent2401 8 months ago
@penitent2401
i think they said 2099
johnson1095 7 months ago
@penitent2401
It's 2099 you dummy.
America100000able 5 months ago
Just imagine how much this projekt will cost??. seriously why even consider something like this....
DjFikus 8 months ago
Comment removed
johnson1095 7 months ago
Comment removed
johnson1095 7 months ago
@DjFikus
Why did ppl consider having mass plane travel?
why did ppl go to the moon?
we do these things "Not because it is easy but becuase it is hard"- JFK
johnson1095 7 months ago
This is a silly idea and a huge waste of resources.
12 trillion dollars, no-one can afford that.
jimmywrangles 8 months ago
@jimmywrangles the world's GDP is around 65-70 trillion, we only need a couple billion people to starve to death then we'll have a tunnel that can move around (taking into estimation average 1000 people per train, 1 train per 2mins, a very bold estimate) 700,000 people moving back and forth in the tunnel per day, assuming the trains runs at peak capacity all day and with no gaps between trains. 200,000 is more likely . we'll also need to nuke all the whales in that ocean to protect the tunnel.
penitent2401 8 months ago
I will never ttravel in this either the bering strait is frikin scary anything could happend and I agreeeeeeeee a lot with @0519075130 people are mean they create things for a reason then what?? by the way build by human means is not perfect!
gme104tube 8 months ago
12 trillion dollars? That's like bailing out wallstreet 13 times!
TaffyAlpha 9 months ago
This is a fairly reasonable idea due to the fact that we could transport goods,fiber optic Internet and passengers at alarming speeds all over the world using the already existing train networks. This would revolutionize the way we live our lives and would produce thousands of jobs for many years and is good for the environment. The only issue is the initial and sustaining costs. I estimate the project to take about 30-70 years to complete so most of us will be fairly old or dead by the time th
gasattackmanliveca 9 months ago
The tunnel idea is mind blowing. I hope I see it and the Bering Strait Bridge in my lifetime.
But where are we gonna get trains that go 5000 miles an hour? Maglevs perhaps?
SpeedbeetleV2 9 months ago
This internet has probably rendered this project obsolete, but undoubtedly it could be done. It could be done well and without it being a drain on the rest of the world. We have the means, we just can't because of money. Just eliminate the middleman of money and it'll be well within reach.
Nathan54AB 10 months ago
begin with the bering strait, then work your way up
MacabreManifesto 11 months ago
if we can bultthe chunnel, we can built the transalantic tunnel
idahopioneer 11 months ago
The idea that you could live on one side and work on the other is fantasy. Not because you couldnt travel but the cost of such a trip everyday would bankrupt you within a week.
Planes cost £300-£500 a ticket right now. And they dont cost that much to build and while fuel is expensive it still doesnt scratch the service for how much the tunnel will cost to run.
It's a great idea if the countries that build it decide to take a huge LOSS per ticket
blaizevincent 11 months ago
@blaizevincent It might only cost the price of a bus or subway ticket since it transports so many each day.
sheraw99 11 months ago
tired of trying to smuggle yourself in a container or behind the wheels of a truck.. take the train... transatlantic tunnel.. immigration... made easy ; ]
Cypher791 1 year ago
This is impossible.
(my opinion)We may pay over $USD50,000 for each ride,cus it's much difficult to build than plane stuffs!
No really.
bbtvN 1 year ago
HE SOUNDS LIKE THE HOMELESS WITH THE GOLDEN VOICE!!!! HAHAHA¬!!!!!
pecfree 1 year ago
It's crazy, it's long, and it's really, really expensive! But it's possible!!!
(I think we should just learn to Apparate first.)
discotheminecrafter 1 year ago
The U.S should pay of their debt before building this thing. 12 trillion dollars. I mean seriously. They should save this one for the year 3000.
hastalavistababy45 1 year ago 3
I can't help but be old fashioned and say that it would probably be cheaper and safer to build a quiet supersonic plane.
mackat4ck 1 year ago 2
technolgy and new stuff, Justin bieber and flying cars, lady gaga and video games. all of these things are not worth it to obsess for.
MultiMoshimonsters 1 year ago
There are already secret undergroung military bases in the U.S . The U.S government have already got these technology's but are slowly wiring them out to the public.
Funny how our world in the last 60 years has evoled rapidly technology wise without us being told 100% on how we really got and new certain thing we just get convincing false stories. we will have this train one day but we will have lots of more things before that to make it possible to develop this.
Inmyownleague 1 year ago
Comment removed
Inmyownleague 1 year ago
in 100 year we shall have warp drive and teleport
ambiva 1 year ago
Thus, while this project is well fieasible from all aspects, it will increase dependance on China.
xxwzaebd 1 year ago
Well...The cost of this system would be trivial for China since it has over 2 trillion USD in forex reserves...but it would matter what they would be able to gain from such an investment..maybe rather geostrategical.
xxwzaebd 1 year ago
This tunnel can be done.
ROCKSOLID19 1 year ago
This design seems impressive, but its also the most impractical, unsafe, and unfeasable thing Ive ever heard of
Pilot853 1 year ago
theres a better idea than this its called concorde bring it back
lalakers1984 1 year ago 30
@lalakers1984
if you know a way to make that happen... be my guest.
it's not gonna happen unless you know ppl high up in government.
johnson1095 7 months ago
@lalakers1984 A journey in a concorde costs more than 10,000$... I'd rather travel in this tunnel!
andreastroelsgaard 2 months ago in playlist Trans-Atlantic Tunnel
@andreastroelsgaard costs would be very high for this tunnel as well. When you consider the deficit the design teams and the investors would have to recover from, including construction, maintenance, anti-terrorist security, and resource usage, the ticket would be a lot more than $10K I assure you.
W0Wman1 2 months ago
just imagine what the cost would be to ride the train
ishotu747 1 year ago
@ishotu747 I would imagine that this tunnel could be used for freight if magnetic levitation for freight is developed. Passenger travel would be expensive at first as it needs to be paid off. A £1,000 from London to New York is still cheaper than Concorde was.
ROCKSOLID19 1 year ago
I wish he wouldn't call it the Chunnel in that serious tone...
edastrong 1 year ago
Insane idea! - But I like it :-)
williamengbjerg 1 year ago
Nice idea, but man oh man would it suck to crash in that thing, you wouldn survive long in a tunnel without air.
RMJ1984 1 year ago
How expensive ist a ticket? 5000$? O_O
tedman0674 1 year ago
huh.....global goverment...that is all about ...illuminati theory...
PPiTTislakatamia 1 year ago
thanks for psting this series
MovieTrailerFanatic 1 year ago
Could somebody tell me if it is even possible to travel at 5,000 mph?
kami645464 1 year ago
@kami645464
in a vacuum
tedman0674 1 year ago
@tedman0674 Today?
kami645464 1 year ago
@kami645464
yes, you need magnetic monorail in a vacuum then you reach extremly high speed
tedman0674 1 year ago
Not worth the risk.
Afrocanuk 1 year ago
o it would be nice
but what next a britge to the moon??
TheFatalforce 1 year ago
@TheFatalforce
Not a bridge, an elevator actually :P
It's called the space elevator, look it up...
NickKoutonias 1 year ago
I like the idea in the ET3 video. A cross of tubes through the US, and a tube that runs all the way up through Alaska, across the Bering Strait, down through India, and all the way through Europe to London. It'd hit more places and likely be cheaper, quicker, and easier to construct.
elbowtido27 1 year ago
it will become a terrorist target,so this becomes a bad idea, to bad !
stevolisa2004 1 year ago 2
Can you imagine how the world would be if every project featured on Extreme Engineering became a Reality? They're kind of farfetched ideas....
raran44 1 year ago
5000 mph?? That's ridiculous. I think 500 is more like it. It'd be for the many who don't want to fly
shattertheearth 1 year ago
@shattertheearth No 5000mph is entirely possible. If you look up "Evacuated Tube Transport", you'll find some more scientifically descriptive videos.
Cheers!
konsit 1 year ago
New development: China are currently working on the Vacuum Trains being discussed in this documentary. Find out more in this fascinating article on high speed rail: ceasefiremagazine. co . uk/2010/09/science-china-train/
AlJalandhari 1 year ago
What about continental drift and earthquakes?
LouistheHedgehog 1 year ago
it would just need enough money and politic willing ! thats all !
chabi3000 1 year ago
The best route would be to go up Alaska to Russia Across Asia and Europe to England and THEN build a tunnel like this to link it back again. It's completely achievable and possibly economical to build the tunnel this way.
I fear today people are getting too used to the status quo and don't want change that improves our lives. Some risk is GOOD!
MarktheSharkSheehan 1 year ago
@MarktheSharkSheehan I agree completeley. And most of it wouldn't even need to be underground saving hundreds of billions of dollars!
arosta1 1 year ago
it's too ambitious to build and to connect the two continents.but with the help of modern technology the too impossible will become possible.
joshmanligro 1 year ago
Cool Idea. But not gonna happen I don't think. Look at Amtrak in America!! Bankrupt, low ridership. I don't know that there is political will to force the idea and fund the project.
porsche187 1 year ago
Now this would be some feat, it will never happen tho, 2 trillion i can put that money to better use why not put that back into the economy and shut up whining about the deficit. Or maybe use that to pay the finance charge? Ha Ha idiots oooh the transparency.
ukandoittowithkandoo 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I bet some bad guys from middle east destroy this tunnel.
0519075130 1 year ago 15
@0519075130
i auch digga
geddoknecht 1 year ago
@0519075130 you always think bad like this.....
bittubutt 1 year ago
@0519075130 Nah that'll be the FBI pretending its the middle easts fault
pimmagrimm 1 year ago
@0519075130 I doubt it would middleesterners, considering that muslims believe knowlodge is the key and one is always a student of life. If anyone were to "destroy" the tunnel it would be the militant jews and christains saying it defies laws of god.
ya2cin 1 year ago
@ya2cin PFFFTTT whatever mate! keep dreaming
cruzte 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@0519075130 I bet some bad Americans would destroy this tunnel and blame middle east so they can go there and act judges to take oil and rape womens.
R1DV4N91 1 year ago 20
@R1DV4N91 lolz... that's what they really do..
psychoparatoxicity 1 year ago
@0519075130 that what my friends say when i tell them about this
BooMers232 1 year ago
@0519075130
I bet you grammar very good English needs some work... xD
rock3tcat 1 year ago
@0519075130
I bet some bad white people from Europe will kidnap the passengers and kill them all inside this tunnel !
LearnToReadTheKuran 9 months ago
Maybe when we can build this tunnel we will not need it anymore
EduEnYT 1 year ago
My opinion, i believe air travel is still the fastest least expensive and most effictive method to travel cross atlantic. If you build a tunnel you would spend a lot of investment just doing the research plus building the tunnel will cost another billion or even trillions of dolloars and also you need to consider mechanical problems in the future as the ocean is actually widening each year and lots more issues etc.
smartbotX 1 year ago
several trillion to build and 100 years so its clear it will never be made
myvideosshared 1 year ago
@myvideosshared
Never say never m-eight.... A hundred years ago no one would have thought that within seconds you could order naked women from all around the world to appear on your desk. And in high quality!!!! :D
rock3tcat 1 year ago
@rock3tcat Man you'r sooo right :D..
hakankiller 1 year ago
STEPHEN CARL MURPHY
stephencarlmurphy1 1 year ago
Not possible. You see, the Atlantic Ocean is actually widening. A tunnel across the Atlantic Ocean would not be able to lengthen with the spreading of the sea floor at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
denelson83 1 year ago
the transatlantic tunnel has very little actual utility... it would be far better, less expensive, easier, and just as fast to just fly in space planes. The two engineering projects for Tokyo are way better. The sky city and the pyramid city have far more utility
Craigipedia 1 year ago
@Craigipedia yeah i agree with you on that one, sub-orbital space planes or supersonic planes would be much better ... bring back the Concorde! lol
MrMitchy27 1 year ago
something to ponder on eh! But, i'm seriously still waiting for my flying car I made a down payment on last friday lol.
lion08021989 1 year ago
a century to complete...holy sheet....
lianghaochen 1 year ago
dam!
qoohkLive7 1 year ago
Why don't they instead of building a tunle create a train that is capeable of travalinh underwater. A very streamlined nose a maglev perhaps. Less moving parts. With emergency explosive that would blow the clamps on the tracks if somthing went wrong and allow the train to float to the surface.
Got to be cheaper than 1 trillion usdollers!
cprich22 1 year ago
@cprich22 Because with the water resistance it will travel at most 50 mph. We already have submarines and they are not very fast. Water is much thicker than air see.
powpanda 1 year ago
I think this will happen. A vacuum tunnel Maglev powered by electricity traveling at 5,000 mph? That would get enormous ridership. Chances are the benifits would outweigh the costs over time. Obviously this wouldn't be a government project, a private company would do everything.
gibb1991 1 year ago
i swear i wont take that train..so dangerous...
zerolionking 1 year ago
You're actually much more likely to die in a Trans-Atlantic Airliner crash than a Maglev crash.
gibb1991 1 year ago
thair is more that one companey that can build this
paddytheduck 1 year ago
I dont think building a tunnel under the Atlantic will ever be done. Too high costs, too many problems, not useful enough.
On the other hand, building enclosed tunnels with high speed trains across Europe/Asia might happen.
ejswe 1 year ago
Whats wrong with taking a plane? Also, I wouldn't feel safe going through that thing. One tiny crack, and you're fucked.
woodpod 1 year ago
Although I think this is awesome. I think it may be impossible. 1. Tectonic shifts would mean the tunnel would have to be lengthened over time. 2. The $Trillion+ pricetag would mean it would take forever to be profitable. 3. Any country or entity that gets into a conflict with the US/UK could drop a bomb on it in the ocean and pretty much destroy a centuries worth of work. The vacuum in the tunnel would allow the water to rush in so fast it would strip the tunnel inside. Cool idea though.
hop208 2 years ago
Still, it seems to me that a supersonic aeroplane is more efficient than this tunnel. Capital costs are much less and we know that it works perfectly well.
Mmaesstrro 2 years ago
1. the ocean ecosystem will be disturbed
2. the costs are too high (that money can be used in other ways)
3. one century is too long, the technology is changing so fast...
... but for our minds it's a good practice
Denisu07 2 years ago
but then the have already started it. So nao wat?
mittenzforevah999 2 years ago
Because it costs so much, it would have to be thousands of dollars for people to use it. Its a crap idea. It would be cheaper to just improve aircraft.
woodpod 1 year ago
I don't believe that if is science fiction. I hope to be one of the first to try it out if it happens in my lifetime.
Trainlover4ever2006 2 years ago
You should probably become a millionaire first then. Cause you can bet a ticket will be worth a small fortune. ;)
Sanngot 2 years ago
What a waste of money.
I like the way they compare a train from 2099 to planes of today. Im guessing a plane of 2099 will get to the US in less than an hour.
chriswba05170 2 years ago
What a waste of money!!?
For how long do you think airplane can serve people from/to North and South America and Europe? 60 years? What after oil? What kind of transportation you will use similar speed to airplane!!!????
Do you think that can use a plane in 2099 After oil?
KAlSuloomi 2 years ago
Well being as they are already working on energy efficient hydrogen jest then yes.
I make the point that they compare just like you did then, trains 100 years in to the planes of today.
My guess is that planes will still be used in 100 years and will be quicker and more efficient than those of today.
chriswba05170 2 years ago
I agree. Peak oil is expected to be reached around 2040, perhaps earlier. This is an electric Magnetic Levitation Train that would obviously be owned and operated by a private company (there's no way taxes would be used for this). This isn't just wanted, it's NEEDED.
gibb1991 1 year ago
Planes will most likely be entirely obsolete by the 22nd Century
Welwyn22 2 years ago
Oh yeh, but this idea looks likely. not
chriswba05170 2 years ago
Comment removed
chriswba05170 2 years ago
um isnt it better to take a plane there? lol.
lvll138inrs 2 years ago
no, think about all the it takes for you to fly, and airport waiting... way too long. This would take an hour
manuelg27 2 years ago
did you just watch this program. it takes an hour u nonce! listen to what their telling you. i hope you arnt in the construction industry. god help us all
robnib1 2 years ago
no. plane is more expensive. you wanker
JointBuster 2 years ago
I think planes suck. Took a plane to Europe last year. It was miserable. Took a train while in Europe. Loved every second.
gibb1991 1 year ago
This Engineering idea is possible, but I don't believe its the best idea in this world's current economic state. We could use those 3 trillion for something else. Such as health care, poverty, etc.
ColdZer04 2 years ago
look health care and poverty problems will always be around. they have their up and downs. Every person should work hard to make their own money and take care of themselves. If companies or the government wants to do a project that is better for everyone to travel, why should they pay that money to some lazy person that can't even take care of their own health needs. I'm not saying we should leave them to die, we should only help people with extreme needs, or handicap people.
Omid45 2 years ago 6
some people in other countries don't get an opportunity to have an education let alone go to collage and get a job, how are they supposed to get money?
harrissaintgermain 2 years ago
well, what does that have to do with the construction of this tunnel that will make life better for potentially billions of people around the world, and generations to come. People having problems should stand up for themselves, change their political system, and government, move out to a better country, many options are available, but all i'm saying is that we should give up on ideas like that just to put that money towards paying for health care, or poverty of a selected people.
Omid45 2 years ago 2
@Omid45 No social darwinism please.
Ibanezium 1 year ago
just listen to the begging, trillions of dollars, almost a century of work in the most impossible condition... which company will invest money on it?
JMsoo 2 years ago
I've heard that there are several companies interested. Yes, it's a risk, but so was companies like Microsoft.
gibb1991 1 year ago
Imagine seeing one of the trains derail XD.
vgmaster9 2 years ago
These are actually Magnetic Levitation Trains that wrap around a guideway and float above it. It's nearly impossible for these trains to derail.
gibb1991 1 year ago
a prime vulnerable target for terrorist.
phadil 2 years ago
totally futuristic, but i think it's somewhat possible.
cooliorox100 2 years ago 17