I can see now why the Gregory Brothers use her a lot. She speaks very rhythmically and lyrically. And all I can hear is her auto tune version of it. I hope they use her again in another Auto the News becuase if they don't, we will end up on "Very Thin Ice."
. NEW truth - just out! Global Warming - SEE Professor Bob Carter A MUST see . . . SEE Professor Bob Carter SEE Professor Bob Carter This has become a lot worse than we ever thought it could, and Professor Bob Carter shows us why. NEW truth - just out! Global Warming - SEE Professor Bob Carter A MUST see . . . . .
There were NO weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - just as Dr. Hans Blix said; But, the Republican media machine didn't want us to hear that.
And, there is NO dangerous climate change caused by human carbon dioxide - just as the "independent scientists" are now trying to tell us! But, the Democrat media machine doesn't want us to hear that.
We are made to run from one boogieman to next, as each political party achieves its own agendas for them & their money mates.
Look at historical data. CO2 was 2000ppm 60 million years ago. Based on historical global temp trends we are due for the next ice age. Recent lower sun activity also threatens of a new ice age. We are nearing peak of global warming and will miss it once gone. By the way, the polar bears did survive past global warming cycles which were several degrees hotter than present climate.
especially because there is practically no chance that anyone will do anything about this since we just keep talking about it, but there is yet to be extreme action.
Do something? Naaa. We've been saying it is a hoax for so long it is now easier to bury our heads in the sand and act like nothing is happening. Nobody ever asks, "What if?" It is always, "Another lie!!" Let the games continue.
6 billion organisms our size can indeed have a very dramatic impact on this planet.
Hell, we have enough nukes to destroy this planet 100 times over. Do you still think we have a large ego?
BTW, the ice ages took tens of thousands of years to change the climate. In just the last 100 years the earth has risen in temperature more rapidly than any period we've ever seen in any of the ice core samples we have.
Do you think we should believe scientists or politicians on this matter?
"destroy this planet 100 times over. Do you still think we have a large ego?"
YES. You just proved it in your very own post. EGO is thinking you can destroy the Planet. We would do nothing but destroy most of the life upon this Planet. The Earth would be fine, and simply start again.
"risen in temperature"
And there lies the problem. We've only been keeping track for a little over 100 years. How can you compare temperatures now, with those 500 years ago?
"You really don't know anything about ice core samples, do you?"
Ya, and I know that they aren't accurate on a 'yearly' basis. They are estimates of somewhere between 2-25-even 100 years. Nothing is coming from those that is consistant with the argument that it is 'Human' activity that is causing such a warming. Humans have only been engaged in Heavy Industry for a little over 200 years. The temperatures have been rising much longer than that... So it's not us, in my eyes.
LoL! You're a funny guy. Missed my point though. Don't act like you're trying to 'Save the Planet'. Because all you're really saving is your own ass. So instead you should say, we need save OUR environment. The Planet will do fine with or without us. I have a LOT of respect for Mother Nature, so don't say that I don't. But the Planet itself has nothing to fear from us...
"Do you think we should believe scientists or politicians on this matter?"
No, I think we should listen to both sides. Because the only thing making the news is one side of the argument. What's the argument you ask? Well it's the argument that we are discussing. Is it people making this happen? Or is it natural? I personally, after looking at the angles and studying a bit, think it's natural. Doesn't mean we shouldn't be cleaner. Doesn't mean we shouldn't care. Just means I don't think it's us.
The only two sides are the scientific community and politicians. Why should we listen to politicians at all? They have no expertise in the area, all they care about is getting re-elected.
"I personally, after looking at the angles and studying a bit, think it's natural."
What angles? What have you studied? You're the kind of guy who must still think tobacco isn't bad for you because you're listening to the same kind of propaganda.
"What angles? What have you studied? You're the kind of guy who must still think tobacco isn't bad for you because you're listening to the same kind of propaganda."
LoL! Funny... You don't know shit about me my friend. So don't put words in my fuckin mouth, mmkay punkin?
There ARE two sides within the Scientific Community as well my friend. Natural or Manmade. THOSE are the sides I'm speaking of. Try not to be so damn judgemental and ignorant...
"There ARE two sides within the Scientific Community"
That is like saying there are two sides in biology, Evolution and Intelligent Design.
The scientific consensus is clear, the earth is warming and humans are causing it. The only stubborn holdouts are the same type of "doctors" who claim tobacco doesn't cause cancer.
Please cite one recent peer reviewed paper that puts forth a reasonable argument for your so called "natural cause".
False. It's more complicated than that. But believe what you will. I just know what I know.
"Please cite one recent peer reviewed paper"
This is Youtube my friend. If you don't care enough to look at both sides of an arguement, that's your problem, NOT mine. There are plenty of sources that talk about just such an issue. It's not my place to educate you.
The crazy thing is, even when the caps melt that will cool the oceans and wind systems leading to freezing in many regions. The planet will even itself out, all you have to worry about is how high above sea level your house is.
I can see now why the Gregory Brothers use her a lot. She speaks very rhythmically and lyrically. And all I can hear is her auto tune version of it. I hope they use her again in another Auto the News becuase if they don't, we will end up on "Very Thin Ice."
TJniby1026lala 23 hours ago
this is flippin retarted...
Flyboys243 1 year ago
very thin ice very thin ice
flarn2006 1 year ago 2
Very thin ice. <3 <3 <3 <3 <3
Popitet 1 year ago
0:54
mostlycrapreviews 1 year ago
We are on very thin ice!
nyave 1 year ago 2
very thin ice... :)
aagloworks 1 year ago 2
surely you jest?
sapperzulu 2 years ago
very thin ice
kill100578 2 years ago
HAPPAY NEW YEAR
Killacats119 2 years ago
OH SNAP HOW FAST?!
MatMichaudz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
weallknowitstrue 2 years ago
There were NO weapons of mass destruction in Iraq - just as Dr. Hans Blix said; But, the Republican media machine didn't want us to hear that.
And, there is NO dangerous climate change caused by human carbon dioxide - just as the "independent scientists" are now trying to tell us! But, the Democrat media machine doesn't want us to hear that.
We are made to run from one boogieman to next, as each political party achieves its own agendas for them & their money mates.
SEE Professor Bob Carter
weallknowitstrue 2 years ago
OMG I finally found this. XD
Sing it T-Pain, geese are on very thin ice!
EnigmaEvocative 2 years ago
VERY THIN ICE!
p0lisen 2 years ago
VERY THIN ICE!
vileCR999 2 years ago 3
VERY THIN ICE
SwitchBlade180 2 years ago
VERY THIN ICE
Longhorn6595 2 years ago
Arctic ice is melting fast? OH SNAP! How fast?
apnAEA 2 years ago
omg. very thin ice. hahahahaha
yellowjello42 2 years ago
VERY THIN ICE
SwitchBlade180 2 years ago
very very very very VERY THIN ICE!
lol
JackAtlus124 2 years ago
Comment removed
JKoss618 2 years ago
i can't stop laughing lol VERY THIN ICE!!! if we're lucky..
abouboo 2 years ago
surely you jest, i'm under CARDIAC ARREST!
Domenic182 2 years ago 3
very thin ice...very thin ice!!!!
fpxdaxbe 2 years ago
Who else is singing this ?
DoogieTalons 2 years ago
SHAWTAAAY!
Escobar9300 2 years ago 3
Look at historical data. CO2 was 2000ppm 60 million years ago. Based on historical global temp trends we are due for the next ice age. Recent lower sun activity also threatens of a new ice age. We are nearing peak of global warming and will miss it once gone. By the way, the polar bears did survive past global warming cycles which were several degrees hotter than present climate.
ononsual 2 years ago
Very thin ice...Very thin ice...Very thin ice...
deangonzales 2 years ago 4
Hearing this somewhere that ISN'T autotune the news is.. weird.
Meatbagz 2 years ago 4
q:some researchers think it will dissapear in only 6
Y:s*it!
Kingoftheargonians 2 years ago 3
Without it there could be a snowball effect, with temperatures rising even faster!
Meatbagz 2 years ago
If we all don't take bold action and take it soon...
SpaceGhostNZ 2 years ago
Oh Snap! How fast?
SpaceGhostNZ 2 years ago 4
GLOBAL WARMING IS A MYTH!
rckingcuzilikeit 2 years ago
I think people would care a lot more about climate change if they auto tune it. We may find ourselves on - Very thin ice, very thin ice. :)
HeyDuffy459 2 years ago 3
OMG, the original video!
Very thin ice, very thin ice... LOL
I know this is a very serious issue, but Autotune The News #2 is so good...
mblovestix 2 years ago 6
lol thats what i was thinking
caindabomb 2 years ago 2
"New satellite photos show Arctic ice is melting so fast..."
"OH SNAP! HOW FAST?"
Niallissoawesome 2 years ago 13
Very thin ice, very thin ice.
Tell em, Hillary, pirates on very thin ice!
UltraSWG 2 years ago 4
"Surley you jest!! I'm under cardiac arrest shawty!!"
"Very thin ice!! Very thin Ice!!"
The En.d
okieriete 2 years ago 4
Oh snap! How fast? LOL!
YungHolla727 2 years ago 4
Surely you jest, I'm under cardiac arrest Shawtay
Spindoll 2 years ago 4
Oh snap! How fast?
OneGyT 2 years ago
this scares the shit out of me!
especially because there is practically no chance that anyone will do anything about this since we just keep talking about it, but there is yet to be extreme action.
kindergardencrush 2 years ago
We're gonna save the planet??? Please...
We can't even take care of ourselves and we're going to save the planet? HAH! That's a laugh...
As George Carlin said, the Planet is fine... The PEOPLE are fucked... difference!
LordBLB 2 years ago
she is very well spoken.
thepianolover4ever 2 years ago
It would be fine if we did get serious about reducing emissions, at least then when they melt we dont feel like we screwed up so bad.
nheitz 2 years ago
Comment removed
goredandwhite 2 years ago
Do something? Naaa. We've been saying it is a hoax for so long it is now easier to bury our heads in the sand and act like nothing is happening. Nobody ever asks, "What if?" It is always, "Another lie!!" Let the games continue.
rlwalker2 2 years ago
Natural processes...
I think it takes a pretty big ego on our part to think we have that large of an effect on this planet.
It is possible that we are simply still warming from the last ice age 10,000 years ago...
We've only been keeping track of temperatures for about 100 years...
LordBLB 2 years ago
so your saying that 4billion pple have no effect on this planet?
wow get a clue
yarber63 2 years ago
Global Warming is the reason it snows in Texas.
RangerMH 2 years ago
"so your saying that 4billion pple have no effect on this planet?
wow get a clue"
Read what I said again. It looks like you either don't read very well, or you have trouble understanding plain english...
Here, I'll quote the part that best answers your question from my first comment.
"so your saying that 4billion pple have no effect on this planet?"
To that I first said...
"I think it takes a pretty big ego on our part to think we have that large of an effect on this planet."
Understand?
LordBLB 2 years ago
6 billion organisms our size can indeed have a very dramatic impact on this planet.
Hell, we have enough nukes to destroy this planet 100 times over. Do you still think we have a large ego?
BTW, the ice ages took tens of thousands of years to change the climate. In just the last 100 years the earth has risen in temperature more rapidly than any period we've ever seen in any of the ice core samples we have.
Do you think we should believe scientists or politicians on this matter?
UltraSWG 2 years ago
"destroy this planet 100 times over. Do you still think we have a large ego?"
YES. You just proved it in your very own post. EGO is thinking you can destroy the Planet. We would do nothing but destroy most of the life upon this Planet. The Earth would be fine, and simply start again.
"risen in temperature"
And there lies the problem. We've only been keeping track for a little over 100 years. How can you compare temperatures now, with those 500 years ago?
LordBLB 2 years ago
"We would do nothing but destroy most of the life upon this Planet. "
Oh, is that all? That is "nothing" to you?
"We've only been keeping track for a little over 100 years. How can you compare temperatures now, with those 500 years ago?"
We can monitor temperatures back much farther than the last 100 years. You really don't know anything about ice core samples, do you?
UltraSWG 2 years ago
"You really don't know anything about ice core samples, do you?"
Ya, and I know that they aren't accurate on a 'yearly' basis. They are estimates of somewhere between 2-25-even 100 years. Nothing is coming from those that is consistant with the argument that it is 'Human' activity that is causing such a warming. Humans have only been engaged in Heavy Industry for a little over 200 years. The temperatures have been rising much longer than that... So it's not us, in my eyes.
LordBLB 2 years ago
"Oh, is that all? That is "nothing" to you?"
LoL! You're a funny guy. Missed my point though. Don't act like you're trying to 'Save the Planet'. Because all you're really saving is your own ass. So instead you should say, we need save OUR environment. The Planet will do fine with or without us. I have a LOT of respect for Mother Nature, so don't say that I don't. But the Planet itself has nothing to fear from us...
LordBLB 2 years ago
"Do you think we should believe scientists or politicians on this matter?"
No, I think we should listen to both sides. Because the only thing making the news is one side of the argument. What's the argument you ask? Well it's the argument that we are discussing. Is it people making this happen? Or is it natural? I personally, after looking at the angles and studying a bit, think it's natural. Doesn't mean we shouldn't be cleaner. Doesn't mean we shouldn't care. Just means I don't think it's us.
LordBLB 2 years ago
"No, I think we should listen to both sides"
The only two sides are the scientific community and politicians. Why should we listen to politicians at all? They have no expertise in the area, all they care about is getting re-elected.
"I personally, after looking at the angles and studying a bit, think it's natural."
What angles? What have you studied? You're the kind of guy who must still think tobacco isn't bad for you because you're listening to the same kind of propaganda.
UltraSWG 2 years ago
"What angles? What have you studied? You're the kind of guy who must still think tobacco isn't bad for you because you're listening to the same kind of propaganda."
LoL! Funny... You don't know shit about me my friend. So don't put words in my fuckin mouth, mmkay punkin?
There ARE two sides within the Scientific Community as well my friend. Natural or Manmade. THOSE are the sides I'm speaking of. Try not to be so damn judgemental and ignorant...
LordBLB 2 years ago
"There ARE two sides within the Scientific Community"
That is like saying there are two sides in biology, Evolution and Intelligent Design.
The scientific consensus is clear, the earth is warming and humans are causing it. The only stubborn holdouts are the same type of "doctors" who claim tobacco doesn't cause cancer.
Please cite one recent peer reviewed paper that puts forth a reasonable argument for your so called "natural cause".
If you do, I can post 10 that refute it.
UltraSWG 2 years ago
"Evolution and Intelligent Design."
You couldn't be more wrong
"and humans are causing it."
False. It's more complicated than that. But believe what you will. I just know what I know.
"Please cite one recent peer reviewed paper"
This is Youtube my friend. If you don't care enough to look at both sides of an arguement, that's your problem, NOT mine. There are plenty of sources that talk about just such an issue. It's not my place to educate you.
LordBLB 2 years ago
"If you do, I can post 10 that refute it"
That doesn't matter my friend. Right there you are agreeing with what I said and you don't even realize it.
"data indicates the Earth is indeed warming, but most of the warming (about 95%) is due to natural causes and beyond our control." -ISA
Essenhigh (OSU) explains a similar position in the journal Chemical Innovation.
There a LOT more than that...
LordBLB 2 years ago
The crazy thing is, even when the caps melt that will cool the oceans and wind systems leading to freezing in many regions. The planet will even itself out, all you have to worry about is how high above sea level your house is.
BinkieMcFartnuggets 2 years ago