The reliability is near flawless. Piston, action and fire control unit are well thought out. It handles like an extension of your arm and promotes good discipline through the ergonomics
Do you like the foregrip you installed? I installed an insight technologies light with laser and C more reflex sight. Pretty comfortable and easy to manipulate the controls in my configuration.
@ILITTHEWORLDONFIRE Function before beauty, if thats what you believed and you decided to just use a pistol than that, you would be shortly found dead with a pistol.
@chikaidenlee 7.62 is shorter than .308. How is 5.56 cheap and exactly how is it better? Are you just thinking that because its a bigger bullet? 5.56 x 45 hits as hard as a .44 magnum. Guess thats cheap too...
@AdmiralGST Wow, just wow. 7.62mm = .308", they're the same thing. 7.62x51 NATO (.308 Winchester) is, however, far more powerful than 7.62x39mm (the cartridge the AK fires). The problems with 5.56 have to do with the projectiles not properly fragmenting, which is a result of low velocity caused by shorter barrels. Newer, more effective rounds have been developed recently to address this issue.
@skillzofatree You should look into the gun a bit more. Up to 5 casings can be "buffered" in it's forward-ejecting tube. If you look closely, for the first two shots, no casings come out. More than likely he had shot more before the video started. If the dust cover is closed, 5 casings will be held, then all the brass comes out at once once the tube is full. The design was purposed to allow ambidextrous shooting without any modifications.
The 2000 shoots a NATO 5.56 round and it is capable of full auto but in the states if u want a full auto gun you have to apply for a class 3 weapons license, and if granted u give up ur 4th amendment right. Its also expensive as hell to purchase a class 3 license as well as a lot of paper work
@crikeniswin no he had a 1 or 2 shells left over from when he was filling the mag if u notice the actual shell casings that came out were empties i mean think about it how can it fire and still have a bullet in the round the way it operates is it gradually pushes the rounds till it has enough in there to push out the spent rounds with each shot. absolutely love this gun they gave it a bad rap on COD mw2 its very accurate and fits like a glove
@flounder2760 How does CoD give it a bad rep? I've shot one before and I had the problem I stated... It is very comfortable though. I just don't like it though, looks like a fish, and doesn't have enough stopping power.
@crikeniswin just like the m249, Scar 16, m16,m4, golani galil, sig 556, Masada, Styer Aug, Famas and the list goes on? They have enough stopping power, a little .22LR can kill a man. You just need to know and be able to shoot them in the right spot
@crikeniswin it doesnt... there was one round(unfired) at the beginning, and one at the end. There is no gas operated weapon in creation that can eject an unfired round and then cycle.
@QQ20034 think about it, do you really think that if it couldn't fire upwards that the belgians, slovenians, saudis and others would be using this? and it's not as if fn didn't test if it can fire upwards...
@sorryociffer Reportedly, they'll eject the rounds even if you're firing straight up, also even if snow/dirty/debris etc. gets into the ejection port, the force is enough to clear it. The only way to jam it is to truly wedge something into the ejection port, which is incredibly unlikely to happen naturally. Same thing would be the case on any other weapon, like an AR, if you jam something in the ejection port.
just to add on to what spetsnaz said, each casing will inevetiably push on a stuck casing, so unless one gets jammed in a unyeilding position they will end up forcing a jammed casing out, so long as that push from later casing are there, the likelihood of a jam is minimal. the same applies to kel tec rfb's
just to add on to what spetsnaz said, each casing will inevetiably push on a stuck casing, so unless one gets jammed in a unyeilding position they will end up forcing a jammed casing out, so long as that push from later casing are there, the likelihood of a jam is minimal. the same applies to kel tec rfb's.
i forsee the vomiting of casings to beome popular in bullpup designs.
The legal definition here in NY goes on to include a definition for shotguns and pistols that are classified as "assault" weapons. I'm very pro gun, a former US Marine infantryman, and I love our second amendment rights, but that doesn't mean I believe there should be no gun control. I just think we have gone about it the wrong way; worrying too much about what people can get, rather than educating the population and gun owners. Being 18 yrs old is no reason to say someone can safely use a gun.
@warlord240g How NY defines them is irrelevent. When was the last time a NY politician got ANYTHING right? The TRUE, ACCEPTED definition of an assault rifle is a weapon of rifle caliber capable of firing fully automatically. The 1934 Ban, 68 GCA, 86 import ban and other associated "AW" bans in various states need complete to be completely repealed.
@sorryociffer If an "assault weapon" must fire automatically, what about modern military firearms like the M4 or M16A4? Neither posesses a full-auto feature, yet both are "assault rifles".
@jack91x Well, by definition an assault rifle has a full auto feature. (If you ask the U.S. Army) However, different dictionaries have different meanings, I say leave it to the pros though. Also, the M4 does have full Auto, and i'm unsure but I think the M16-A4 does too. Unless you buy the one's made for civilians, which usually don't. You have to have a liscence for fully automatic weapons as a civilian though.
Not pickin on ya or anything, just thought I would share my information.
@fwahoovaghad The M4 definitely DOES NOT have a full auto setting. It has a three round burst setting, a single shot, and safe. An armorer could convert it, but that's against regulations. Trust me, I'm an 11B, i have INTIMATE knowledge of the M4. M16A4 also lacks full auto, while its predecessors have it.
@jack91x Really? That's interesting. I am pretty sure at some point in history they did. Maybe they changed it? Anyhow, thanks for the info! Also, you know a lot about guns? Sounds like you would be an interesting person to talk to.
@Symbiot5 THe M4 is what is issued to US Army combat forces, not the M4A1. It was discovered that removing the ability to fire full auto reduced ammo consumption, increased accuracy, and lowered the amount of weapons malfunctions. Whereas before soldiers sprayed at the target, the modern infantryman can drop a moving target at 400 meters.
@jack91x I'm under the impression that the A1 is issued to special forces and the like with the M4 being issued to standard infantry. Besides, I was just explaining the difference, not saying who gets what.
@Symbiot5 SF weaponry is dependent entirely upon the mission, availability, and shooter's preference. There has been a recent push, led by 5th SFG, to rely more heavily on the platforms developed by FN Herstal, such as the SCAR, because the SCAR H fires 7.62 the most common round for somebody to acquire if they were to be cut off from friendly supply channels. Remember though, an 18B is proficient in the operation and maintenance of 42 different weapons systems, so any weapon works.
@sorryociffer Actually most of us in the know worldwide define 'assault weapon' as a weapon firing an intermediate power cartridge in fully auto mode (7.92 x 33, 7.62 x39, etc.). So, for example, a fully auto FAL is not an assault rifle. Remember, the term 'assault rifle' comes from the StG.44, the worlds first.
@sorryociffer not to necro an old message, but I do not agree. The M16A2 is a select fire weapon with 3 round burst, and most of the service weapons (ironically made by FN anymore) are not modified to shoot full auto. It is still however an assault rifle.
@warlord240g well new york doesn't know what an "assult weapons is" its a select fire weapon(so semi autos are not them) that fires an intermediate caridge such as .223, a pistol grip or a colapsable stock ect so nor fit any of the criteria, poloticians are just ignorant
I would just like to point out that the "actual definiton" of an "assault" rifle varies from state to state. I live in NY where it is defined as A semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable
magazine and has at least two of the following characteristics:a folding or telescoping stock;a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon a bayonet mount;a flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor a grenade launcher
You know what is fucking weak? Poor reading comprehension. As the description and title says, this is a FS2000, a SEMI-auto variation of the F2000, a FULL-auto weapon.
@fairo It's his style jackass anyhow he was testing the accuracy you don't test accuracy shooting fully automatic and if he doe's shoot fully automatic the person he borrowed it from would think this guy is an idiot.Anyways you cannot shoot this gun fully automatic considering it's the Semi-Automatic Variant.Use common sense.
Do you always use that forgrip or was it just for extra support in this video? Ive shot one of these before with my uncle and i thought it felt perfectly fine with the grip it came with.
I actually prefer the standard fore-grip. The vertical fore-grip felt awkward shooting prone and does not feel the same as shooting the AUG with its VFG, which is much more comfortable.
@sorryociffer it is for civilians and to a degree law enforcement. but the military actually has guys with similar guns shooting back. taking a carefully aimed shot goes out the window in that situation.
Not entirely. Carefully aimed as well as snap shots still result in more kills than "spray and pray" full auto, with the exception of ambush/counter ambush scenarios.
@MrSvingy I hate it when retards post comments on a gun video when they know nothing. He has the civilian version of the gun which means it's semi auto. He would have to get a special license for the F2000. Plus, semi auto or 3 round burst is much more accurate than full auto. Full auto just sprays bullets all over the place, and when you do hit your target then you get something called overkill. You're a dumbass.
@MrSvingy and in a REAL war most soliders will shot their rifles in semiauto... becouse full auto has very few practical aplications.... BTW do u play mw2?
LOL WUT SEE THT BULLET THT STLL IN THE CONTAINER WERE THE BULETS WERE POPPING OUT? DID IT COME OUT OF THE CHAMBER LIKE THT CAUSE IF IT WAS JUST A LIL CENTIMETER AWAY FROM BLOWING OUT HE WOULDA GOT KILLED
Good lord....1.) It was a dud that was manually ejected. 2.) It's a case, not a "container" and bullets come out of a barrel, not an ejection port or tube. 3.) This is a semi auto version of a combat weapon. They are designed to contain OOB detonations. You'll get a good surprise but serious injury is unlikely.
If you want to be taken seriously, learn the proper terminology, use proper spelling and grammar,and think before posting.
I think I already talked about it. I don't expect everyone to talk/write as if they are being graded on it, but people should spell, speak, and write at a level higher than a 10 year old and at least have a slight clue as to what they are talking about. Sorry if I embarrassed you, but talking/typing like that does not make you look cool or smart.
@sorryociffer Im suprised you could make heads or tails of what he was trying to say. Between his abbreviations, poor spelling, and general jibberish he had me scratching my head, lol.
@sorryociffer Actually I thought the same thing but re watched the video and the bullet was already laying there before he was firing. The rest of the casings were empty as they should be.
@Theorisable Out Of Battery = OOB Means that a round ignited without the bolt being fully locked up into the barrel or barrel extension etc. This is bad as many rounds generate in excess of 50k+psi and can act like a plasma cutter to surrounding materials or blow a poorly made/designed weapon up.
@sorryociffer Not everyone in the world is english though, you might take that in to concideration. Not everyone can know american gun lingo by default. To me your terms upper/lower receiver just sound stupid, our term in the army was (when translated to english) box & box cover. Peace, chill, good vid.
@Kekkon3n I understand but unlike some weapons, the AR/M series DOES have 2 distinct receiver portions that carry important pieces and mate together which make "upper/lower receiver" make sense and is correct. If I knew what rifle you were talking about and you said box or box cover I would have understood you because I am familiar with weapons and not someone who pretends to in order to look cool like so many others try. I never fault anyone for asking a question if they do not know the answer.
@sorryociffer I had the Sako 7.62(x39) RK95-TP while I served. So the receiver or what ever, is the box that houses all of the mechanisms the AK pretty much has to fire a bullet. The top is just a dust cover / box cover technically though in valmet/sako and galil's which are based on valmet rk62 scematics have the rear sight also attached to it.
My point in the original message pretty much was that not every one speaks English thus not everyone knows US gun lingo/ dictionary. Like clip != mag
@Kekkon3n I understood what you said. If you said you used the Sako and said box & box cover I would have known what you meant. The Sako, BTW, is a beautiful weapon and the pinnacle of AK development in my mind. I think those who wish to speak on a subject like they know what they are speaking of, should use the correct terminology Look at Dano78229 and my reply to him. Technically a clip is not the same as a mag, one encloses the ammo, other other merely holds rounds such as a stripper clip.
@sorryociffer Yup, but as I described in that message that I didn't directly direct to you It was a poor example.. As of why I didn't mention the Sako at the first message it's these damn youtube comment character restrictions. It's very difficult to write one's opinion clearly in such a short burst of words.
That example wasn't probably the best. But translated to various languages they might differ. Like one time I saw an avid American gun enthusiast who was blaming loudly on everyone who mistakenly called an m14 an "assault rifle" since it's a "battle rifle". Also nowadays I wonder can it be called a DMR ;).
When in my language there there is no other translation in the dictionary for the word "Battle rifle" other than Rynnäkkökivääri (RK) which of course means "Assault rifle"... Peace out..
@Kekkon3n Very true, there are many people who think they are more informed than they really are and then spread bad info to others who then keep spreading it.... The M-14 could likely carry either moniker these days depending on how it was equipped.
@forsberg2010 you dumb piece of shit you can hunt with these. You can own full-auto post-ban rifles here in the us and think for just a moment if your country was invaded by a foreign force I guarantee you would want to find the nearest "assault" rifle you could find. And just to rub it in your face I personally own 12 ak-47 variant rifles 23 m-4 and m-14 style rifles and god only knows how many shotguns, other rifles, and pistols I own.
@TheStevenstatzer Lol wut. Why so many of the same? why not mix it up a bit? A little .30 cal here, a .338 there and a bit of .408 cheytac mixed in with the rest :3
yea i dont Think this is a very good gun. Who made It? ROunds wernt even firing
TheMgmt420 3 days ago
These rifles are so fat it feels retarded in your hands
Scottypowpow 4 days ago
The reliability is near flawless. Piston, action and fire control unit are well thought out. It handles like an extension of your arm and promotes good discipline through the ergonomics
Holesinsocks 1 week ago
How's the reliability?
MrGunman11 1 week ago
how would one clear a jam on this rifle
50TNCSA 1 week ago
Combat Arms
mathviolin 1 week ago
Do you like the foregrip you installed? I installed an insight technologies light with laser and C more reflex sight. Pretty comfortable and easy to manipulate the controls in my configuration.
Holesinsocks 1 week ago
He has unlocked the foregrip! xd
EddieLeftHome 2 weeks ago
What kind of clarence is needed for this fire arm?
major101major 1 month ago
Those shell casings are going to burn his hand
BakeddCat 1 month ago
What's up with the ejector? The casings are just rolling out, if at all.
12gaugeTim 2 months ago
id rather have a pistol
ILITTHEWORLDONFIRE 2 months ago
@ILITTHEWORLDONFIRE Why would you rather have a pistol? Pistols aren't that great for fighting.
FiveTwoSevenTHR 2 months ago
@FiveTwoSevenTHR as dumb as it sounds i wouldnt be caught dead wit a bullpup cause of looks
ILITTHEWORLDONFIRE 2 months ago
@ILITTHEWORLDONFIRE Function before beauty, if thats what you believed and you decided to just use a pistol than that, you would be shortly found dead with a pistol.
FiveTwoSevenTHR 2 months ago
Comment removed
SAQQUSAWRU 2 months ago
What happens when fire it at a 45+ degree angle with that round chute?
BabsControl 3 months ago
@BabsControl They come out as they should, no issues...
sorryociffer 2 months ago
I've fired one and it seems like the recoil is a little worse than other .223 rifles
zellarsDD777 3 months ago
Are magazine changes as awkward as I'm imagining them to be?
IlliniEnginerd21 4 months ago
haha assault salmon
1991araaron 4 months ago
anyone else notice there was an unfired round at the bottom right corner of the screen?
colinmoriarty 4 months ago 7
@colinmoriarty Yes, about 23 other people noticed it, it was a dud that was manually ejected.
sorryociffer 2 months ago
The gun is too loud.
SuperRip7 5 months ago
I hate the sights of the GN FS2000. It looks cheap and an afterthought.
SuperRip7 5 months ago
i like the front ejection
TheDGMJR 5 months ago
5.56 x 45 mm
synthostyle 5 months ago
7,62mm is better
Coca033 5 months ago
@Coca033 i know 7.62x39 is a few mm.smaller than .308 much better than the cheap 5.56
chikaidenlee 4 months ago
@chikaidenlee 7.62 is shorter than .308. How is 5.56 cheap and exactly how is it better? Are you just thinking that because its a bigger bullet? 5.56 x 45 hits as hard as a .44 magnum. Guess thats cheap too...
AdmiralGST 4 months ago
@AdmiralGST Wow, just wow. 7.62mm = .308", they're the same thing. 7.62x51 NATO (.308 Winchester) is, however, far more powerful than 7.62x39mm (the cartridge the AK fires). The problems with 5.56 have to do with the projectiles not properly fragmenting, which is a result of low velocity caused by shorter barrels. Newer, more effective rounds have been developed recently to address this issue.
Nater245689 1 month ago
lol did anyone see two bullet casings coming out from one shot?
skillzofatree 5 months ago
@skillzofatree You should look into the gun a bit more. Up to 5 casings can be "buffered" in it's forward-ejecting tube. If you look closely, for the first two shots, no casings come out. More than likely he had shot more before the video started. If the dust cover is closed, 5 casings will be held, then all the brass comes out at once once the tube is full. The design was purposed to allow ambidextrous shooting without any modifications.
bobbfwed 5 months ago
almost looks like the new shotgun from keltech ksg with that grip on it
heretic1915 5 months ago
The 2000 shoots a NATO 5.56 round and it is capable of full auto but in the states if u want a full auto gun you have to apply for a class 3 weapons license, and if granted u give up ur 4th amendment right. Its also expensive as hell to purchase a class 3 license as well as a lot of paper work
cobragolf1 5 months ago
I'm pretty sure that this weapon because of it's cost there is some failsafe for this beside that only happens on cheap weapons
capice2003 5 months ago
How would you clear a stoppage with this system?
LosBerkos 5 months ago
@LosBerkos there's a little hatch that gives you access to the chamber
SqoundreL 5 months ago
I like the shell ejection on it! Make me want to fire one!
TosXMellow 5 months ago
What kind of ammo were you using?? It looks almost as smooth as a P-S90. I
IanBeastLax 5 months ago
Why does this gun tend to eject non-spent cartridges? Piece of Belgian crap....
crikeniswin 6 months ago
@crikeniswin no he had a 1 or 2 shells left over from when he was filling the mag if u notice the actual shell casings that came out were empties i mean think about it how can it fire and still have a bullet in the round the way it operates is it gradually pushes the rounds till it has enough in there to push out the spent rounds with each shot. absolutely love this gun they gave it a bad rap on COD mw2 its very accurate and fits like a glove
flounder2760 6 months ago
@flounder2760 How does CoD give it a bad rep? I've shot one before and I had the problem I stated... It is very comfortable though. I just don't like it though, looks like a fish, and doesn't have enough stopping power.
crikeniswin 6 months ago
@crikeniswin just like the m249, Scar 16, m16,m4, golani galil, sig 556, Masada, Styer Aug, Famas and the list goes on? They have enough stopping power, a little .22LR can kill a man. You just need to know and be able to shoot them in the right spot
TapRackBoom 6 months ago
@TapRackBoom Yes it can but it is not as effective as a heavier round...
crikeniswin 6 months ago
@crikeniswin very true, not as powerful as the 7.62 russian round, but i still wouldnt want to be shot by it
TapRackBoom 6 months ago
@crikeniswin it doesnt... there was one round(unfired) at the beginning, and one at the end. There is no gas operated weapon in creation that can eject an unfired round and then cycle.
TapRackBoom 6 months ago
I'll stick with Colt.
MrDanimul6 6 months ago
Lets see the turd world try to get this outsourced.
yuri60014 6 months ago
is this a real gun?
bbooys103 6 months ago
@bbooys103
of course, it's made by Fn Herstal or Fnh Usa. :)
It's from the company that makes the machine guns (m240/m249) for the American army :)
timmerke13 6 months ago
Im proud to live in a place where I dont have to know anything but I can go get a gun, and I can buy it with mear change
Nicholasdude187 7 months ago
Cool ejection system
turtlesmasher101 7 months ago
how much does that 5.56 ammunition cost? and can you buy it a retail/sporting good stores?
daleboyrdm 7 months ago
$100 a box (500 rounds i believe)
blackhawk65589 6 months ago
It looks very comfortable to shoot.
TboneSTEAK111 7 months ago 13
@TboneSTEAK111 With the VFG, it is so-so. Without it, it is actually quite comfortable.
sorryociffer 7 months ago 9
@sorryociffer Don't the F2000's jam alot?
JasionJones 6 months ago
@JasionJones
No, at least the version that i used in the army( F2000 S).
boyidrski 6 months ago
@sorryociffer what is a vfg???
lukyluk666 5 months ago
@lukyluk666 Vertical ForeGrip.
brqde1319 4 months ago
it looks like it would be in halo
yonsuckas 7 months ago
buetiful gun
wered431 7 months ago
@fwahoovaghad: M4A1 has full auto; M4 is same as M16, three-round burst only.
Also, not all M16A4 predecessors had full auto - M16 and M16A1 had full auto, M16A2 only had three-round burst, M16A3 again had full auto.
int0x19 7 months ago
One of the bullets that came out hadn't been shot yet
DahNoob 8 months ago
Fuck that sounds like a 7.62....
sparkymmilarky 8 months ago
I love gun
mobai123 8 months ago
why does this weapon look like a fish
The2323full 8 months ago 19
@The2323full
Without the fore-grip it looks and feels even more like one. The F2000 assault salmon...coming to a battlefield near you!
sorryociffer 8 months ago 28
@sorryociffer near meh? I AM HONORED TO BE SHOT WHIT THIS
The2323full 8 months ago
@sorryociffer does it taste good?
The2323full 8 months ago
@sorryociffer That comment was so full of win.
Nicholasdude187 7 months ago
@The2323full It was designed and constructed for Navy SEALs! :P
MP7A3 8 months ago
@MP7A3 you mean other animals use fish as a weapon WOW!!
The2323full 8 months ago
@The2323full Precisely! All in the efforts to baffle Al-Qaeda, and other terrorist organisations!
MP7A3 8 months ago
@MP7A3 i mean the animal- seal uses fish to slap people. ARE YOU A MORON
The2323full 8 months ago
@The2323full why do you look like a fish.
beetleboy96 7 months ago
@beetleboy96 why do you rape black people ? but srsly back to the weapon
The2323full 7 months ago
@beetleboy96 ...
beetleboy96 7 months ago
@The2323full because it's an awesome rifle!
joewtjjoewp1 7 months ago
@The2323full it doesn't look like a fish but when i look at it I think "fish"
TheNosyGamer 7 months ago
@The2323full That's why it's called "F" 2000...joking
mikeymickymichael 5 months ago
@The2323full that's one dangerous fish there lol
Roanapaura 3 months ago
i wonder how it eject when firing to sky.
QQ20034 8 months ago
@QQ20034 think about it, do you really think that if it couldn't fire upwards that the belgians, slovenians, saudis and others would be using this? and it's not as if fn didn't test if it can fire upwards...
o0ze 8 months ago
the shell eject doesnt seem normal to me!
erik818ws 8 months ago
@erik818ws Yep, the shell ejects out the front of the rifle
LuyenDarkness 6 months ago
@manowartrexspacefan No. lol It was just sitting there. Probably a dud or something from earlier.
snomankak 9 months ago
@snomankak
Correct. Dud round that was manually ejected.
sorryociffer 8 months ago
Is the iron sights accurate? The system seems a little awkward.
snomankak 9 months ago
@manowartrexspacefan LOL thats impossible. Just look up how the gun works.
snomankak 9 months ago
belgian piece of shit!!!
look when the bullets come out by the first schoots
fredfeuerstone1 9 months ago
@fredfeuerstone1 aww, angry german got some sauerkraut in his lederhosen..
BelgianMusic 9 months ago
@BelgianMusic
idiotas
/watch?v=GH3MLmvhuCA&feature=channel_video_title
look here
the best guy on youtube say it in this video
reason = youre an idiot
fredfeuerstone1 9 months ago
@fredfeuerstone1 eh? try forming a coherent sentence before calling me an idiot...
BelgianMusic 9 months ago
@BelgianMusic i can not so good english im not so old like you
fredfeuerstone1 9 months ago
@fredfeuerstone1 And that's a problem why? Bullets normally come out the front of the barrel, if they don't, then you got a shitty gun.
I think you mean shell or casing. and I see nothing wrong about them ejecting out the front, please, elaborate.
LuyenDarkness 6 months ago
hunk o' shit
jhaul21 9 months ago
hey, because of the forward ejecting system, does that mean if you tilt the gun will there be jams? or will they push themselves out?
SpetsnazFinest 10 months ago
@SpetsnazFinest
They will push themselves out. It is actually quite reliable and robust and has passed several military trials.
sorryociffer 9 months ago
@sorryociffer Reportedly, they'll eject the rounds even if you're firing straight up, also even if snow/dirty/debris etc. gets into the ejection port, the force is enough to clear it. The only way to jam it is to truly wedge something into the ejection port, which is incredibly unlikely to happen naturally. Same thing would be the case on any other weapon, like an AR, if you jam something in the ejection port.
tneper 9 months ago
@SpetsnazFinest
just to add on to what spetsnaz said, each casing will inevetiably push on a stuck casing, so unless one gets jammed in a unyeilding position they will end up forcing a jammed casing out, so long as that push from later casing are there, the likelihood of a jam is minimal. the same applies to kel tec rfb's
CopperLeagueGaming 9 months ago
@SpetsnazFinest
just to add on to what spetsnaz said, each casing will inevetiably push on a stuck casing, so unless one gets jammed in a unyeilding position they will end up forcing a jammed casing out, so long as that push from later casing are there, the likelihood of a jam is minimal. the same applies to kel tec rfb's.
i forsee the vomiting of casings to beome popular in bullpup designs.
CopperLeagueGaming 9 months ago
@CopperLeagueGaming
Oh cool! Thanks for letting me know! =D
SpetsnazFinest 9 months ago
one live round on the table
majorballer 10 months ago
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't this the FS2000 "tactical"? Because it has the rail on the top instead of the optical sight.
foonad 10 months ago
I freaking love the case ejection on these guns..
H00R00able 10 months ago
i love how the shells just plop out like that
iwasborninyourbutt 10 months ago
thats sweet the casings coming out the front instead of the side
stupid2monkey 10 months ago
The legal definition here in NY goes on to include a definition for shotguns and pistols that are classified as "assault" weapons. I'm very pro gun, a former US Marine infantryman, and I love our second amendment rights, but that doesn't mean I believe there should be no gun control. I just think we have gone about it the wrong way; worrying too much about what people can get, rather than educating the population and gun owners. Being 18 yrs old is no reason to say someone can safely use a gun.
warlord240g 10 months ago 9
@warlord240g How NY defines them is irrelevent. When was the last time a NY politician got ANYTHING right? The TRUE, ACCEPTED definition of an assault rifle is a weapon of rifle caliber capable of firing fully automatically. The 1934 Ban, 68 GCA, 86 import ban and other associated "AW" bans in various states need complete to be completely repealed.
sorryociffer 10 months ago 18
@sorryociffer If an "assault weapon" must fire automatically, what about modern military firearms like the M4 or M16A4? Neither posesses a full-auto feature, yet both are "assault rifles".
jack91x 8 months ago
@jack91x
They still have a burst mode, making them still assault rifles.
sorryociffer 8 months ago
@sorryociffer That makes sense, thank you.
jack91x 8 months ago
@jack91x Well, by definition an assault rifle has a full auto feature. (If you ask the U.S. Army) However, different dictionaries have different meanings, I say leave it to the pros though. Also, the M4 does have full Auto, and i'm unsure but I think the M16-A4 does too. Unless you buy the one's made for civilians, which usually don't. You have to have a liscence for fully automatic weapons as a civilian though.
Not pickin on ya or anything, just thought I would share my information.
fwahoovaghad 7 months ago
@fwahoovaghad The M4 definitely DOES NOT have a full auto setting. It has a three round burst setting, a single shot, and safe. An armorer could convert it, but that's against regulations. Trust me, I'm an 11B, i have INTIMATE knowledge of the M4. M16A4 also lacks full auto, while its predecessors have it.
jack91x 7 months ago
@jack91x Really? That's interesting. I am pretty sure at some point in history they did. Maybe they changed it? Anyhow, thanks for the info! Also, you know a lot about guns? Sounds like you would be an interesting person to talk to.
fwahoovaghad 7 months ago
@fwahoovaghad The M4 has semi-auto and three round burst options, while the M4A1 has semi-automatic and fully-automatic options.
Symbiot5 7 months ago
@Symbiot5 THe M4 is what is issued to US Army combat forces, not the M4A1. It was discovered that removing the ability to fire full auto reduced ammo consumption, increased accuracy, and lowered the amount of weapons malfunctions. Whereas before soldiers sprayed at the target, the modern infantryman can drop a moving target at 400 meters.
jack91x 7 months ago
@jack91x I'm under the impression that the A1 is issued to special forces and the like with the M4 being issued to standard infantry. Besides, I was just explaining the difference, not saying who gets what.
Symbiot5 7 months ago
@Symbiot5 SF weaponry is dependent entirely upon the mission, availability, and shooter's preference. There has been a recent push, led by 5th SFG, to rely more heavily on the platforms developed by FN Herstal, such as the SCAR, because the SCAR H fires 7.62 the most common round for somebody to acquire if they were to be cut off from friendly supply channels. Remember though, an 18B is proficient in the operation and maintenance of 42 different weapons systems, so any weapon works.
jack91x 7 months ago
@Symbiot5 Ahh, okay. Thank you.
fwahoovaghad 7 months ago
@jack91x The M4A1 does have a fully automatic setting, although the M4 has a 3rd burst setting
556forlunch 7 months ago
@556forlunch Yes, and the M4 is what is issued, not the M4A1.
jack91x 7 months ago
@sorryociffer Actually most of us in the know worldwide define 'assault weapon' as a weapon firing an intermediate power cartridge in fully auto mode (7.92 x 33, 7.62 x39, etc.). So, for example, a fully auto FAL is not an assault rifle. Remember, the term 'assault rifle' comes from the StG.44, the worlds first.
DepakoteMeister 6 months ago
@DepakoteMeister If the most fully, true to roots manner, yes you are correct. It still must be capable of full auto though.
sorryociffer 6 months ago
@sorryociffer not to necro an old message, but I do not agree. The M16A2 is a select fire weapon with 3 round burst, and most of the service weapons (ironically made by FN anymore) are not modified to shoot full auto. It is still however an assault rifle.
valkyrie321 1 month ago
@warlord240g well new york doesn't know what an "assult weapons is" its a select fire weapon(so semi autos are not them) that fires an intermediate caridge such as .223, a pistol grip or a colapsable stock ect so nor fit any of the criteria, poloticians are just ignorant
TheAlexagius 9 months ago
I would just like to point out that the "actual definiton" of an "assault" rifle varies from state to state. I live in NY where it is defined as A semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to accept a detachable
magazine and has at least two of the following characteristics:a folding or telescoping stock;a pistol grip that protrudes conspicuously beneath the action of the weapon a bayonet mount;a flash suppressor or threaded barrel designed to accommodate a flash suppressor a grenade launcher
warlord240g 10 months ago
Excuse me sir but where did u find that particular fs2000? it has nifty under rail where a grip can be put.
Resoses 10 months ago
fuckin weak.....single shooting the f2000 wat an insult..let it rip!!! thats wat its made for!
fairo 11 months ago
@fairo
You know what is fucking weak? Poor reading comprehension. As the description and title says, this is a FS2000, a SEMI-auto variation of the F2000, a FULL-auto weapon.
sorryociffer 11 months ago 19
@fairo You ass.
BurtonKelly0 11 months ago
@fairo It's his style jackass anyhow he was testing the accuracy you don't test accuracy shooting fully automatic and if he doe's shoot fully automatic the person he borrowed it from would think this guy is an idiot.Anyways you cannot shoot this gun fully automatic considering it's the Semi-Automatic Variant.Use common sense.
MegaDOubleRainbow 11 months ago
@fairo
Are you a fucking moron? Not 1 privately owned selective fire F2000 exists in the whole US.
RyanR3volution 10 months ago
@fairo
"thats wat its made for!"
Your intelligence is about as justified as your hideous grammar.
The FS2000 cannot fire in full-auto. It only has 2 positions, safe & semi.
AGeekWithAShotgun 10 months ago
@fairo moron
tkenni 10 months ago
press pause and keep pressing 7 ;D
NFSPROSTREET95 11 months ago
Do you always use that forgrip or was it just for extra support in this video? Ive shot one of these before with my uncle and i thought it felt perfectly fine with the grip it came with.
rsgraff281 11 months ago
@rsgraff281
I actually prefer the standard fore-grip. The vertical fore-grip felt awkward shooting prone and does not feel the same as shooting the AUG with its VFG, which is much more comfortable.
sorryociffer 11 months ago
lol rednecks
ikill4fatcity 11 months ago
i hate it when somebody has a full auto rifle,but fires semi auto
MrSvingy 1 year ago
@MrSvingy
. The FS2000 is a semi auto only version of the F2000. BTW, full auto is over rated.
sorryociffer 1 year ago 27
@sorryociffer it doesn't seem that way...
ahunkofspam 1 year ago
@sorryociffer one shot one kill
fangmama63 11 months ago
@sorryociffer it is for civilians and to a degree law enforcement. but the military actually has guys with similar guns shooting back. taking a carefully aimed shot goes out the window in that situation.
MrWarlord396 8 months ago
@MrWarlord396
Not entirely. Carefully aimed as well as snap shots still result in more kills than "spray and pray" full auto, with the exception of ambush/counter ambush scenarios.
sorryociffer 8 months ago
@MrSvingy They're both fun. Full auto wastes a lot of ammo. Just because we have nukes doesn't mean we should nuke the world. Discipline.
RealMemoryDecay 1 year ago
@MrSvingy sorry, call of duty isn't real life. Full auto weapons are only legal if you have the license for it. and honestly, very few people do.
Magic2312 11 months ago
@MrSvingy I hate it when retards post comments on a gun video when they know nothing. He has the civilian version of the gun which means it's semi auto. He would have to get a special license for the F2000. Plus, semi auto or 3 round burst is much more accurate than full auto. Full auto just sprays bullets all over the place, and when you do hit your target then you get something called overkill. You're a dumbass.
bb152005 11 months ago
@MrSvingy and in a REAL war most soliders will shot their rifles in semiauto... becouse full auto has very few practical aplications.... BTW do u play mw2?
curseofa5r5a 11 months ago
Civilian rifles are typically never fully auto-able. And fully automatic fire is loud and annoying lol.
peepeevagi 11 months ago
@MrSvingy i'd rather let my finger make the weapon go full auto :)
free00to00ryhme 11 months ago
belgian piece of shit Aug is much better
AUSTRIA
Holligan878 1 year ago
does the civillian edition come with that wierd ass alien looking rangefinder/scope
deadriclord678 1 year ago
@deadriclord678
You can get the flat top or the optical model. The flat top is in my opinion, the better one. The optical version is underwhelming.
sorryociffer 11 months ago
LOL WUT SEE THT BULLET THT STLL IN THE CONTAINER WERE THE BULETS WERE POPPING OUT? DID IT COME OUT OF THE CHAMBER LIKE THT CAUSE IF IT WAS JUST A LIL CENTIMETER AWAY FROM BLOWING OUT HE WOULDA GOT KILLED
Dano78229 1 year ago
@Dano78229
Good lord....1.) It was a dud that was manually ejected. 2.) It's a case, not a "container" and bullets come out of a barrel, not an ejection port or tube. 3.) This is a semi auto version of a combat weapon. They are designed to contain OOB detonations. You'll get a good surprise but serious injury is unlikely.
If you want to be taken seriously, learn the proper terminology, use proper spelling and grammar,and think before posting.
sorryociffer 1 year ago 30
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@sorryociffer dont talk about grammar yankie. troll gets trolled.
Dano78229 1 year ago
@Dano78229
I think I already talked about it. I don't expect everyone to talk/write as if they are being graded on it, but people should spell, speak, and write at a level higher than a 10 year old and at least have a slight clue as to what they are talking about. Sorry if I embarrassed you, but talking/typing like that does not make you look cool or smart.
sorryociffer 1 year ago 10
@sorryociffer Im suprised you could make heads or tails of what he was trying to say. Between his abbreviations, poor spelling, and general jibberish he had me scratching my head, lol.
lchitman 1 year ago
@sorryociffer Actually I thought the same thing but re watched the video and the bullet was already laying there before he was firing. The rest of the casings were empty as they should be.
Khazzy90 11 months ago
@sorryociffer What is an OOB detonation?
Theorisable 11 months ago
@Theorisable Out Of Battery = OOB Means that a round ignited without the bolt being fully locked up into the barrel or barrel extension etc. This is bad as many rounds generate in excess of 50k+psi and can act like a plasma cutter to surrounding materials or blow a poorly made/designed weapon up.
sorryociffer 11 months ago
@sorryociffer Not everyone in the world is english though, you might take that in to concideration. Not everyone can know american gun lingo by default. To me your terms upper/lower receiver just sound stupid, our term in the army was (when translated to english) box & box cover. Peace, chill, good vid.
Kekkon3n 8 months ago
@Kekkon3n I understand but unlike some weapons, the AR/M series DOES have 2 distinct receiver portions that carry important pieces and mate together which make "upper/lower receiver" make sense and is correct. If I knew what rifle you were talking about and you said box or box cover I would have understood you because I am familiar with weapons and not someone who pretends to in order to look cool like so many others try. I never fault anyone for asking a question if they do not know the answer.
sorryociffer 8 months ago
@sorryociffer I had the Sako 7.62(x39) RK95-TP while I served. So the receiver or what ever, is the box that houses all of the mechanisms the AK pretty much has to fire a bullet. The top is just a dust cover / box cover technically though in valmet/sako and galil's which are based on valmet rk62 scematics have the rear sight also attached to it.
My point in the original message pretty much was that not every one speaks English thus not everyone knows US gun lingo/ dictionary. Like clip != mag
Kekkon3n 8 months ago
@Kekkon3n I understood what you said. If you said you used the Sako and said box & box cover I would have known what you meant. The Sako, BTW, is a beautiful weapon and the pinnacle of AK development in my mind. I think those who wish to speak on a subject like they know what they are speaking of, should use the correct terminology Look at Dano78229 and my reply to him. Technically a clip is not the same as a mag, one encloses the ammo, other other merely holds rounds such as a stripper clip.
sorryociffer 8 months ago
@sorryociffer Yup, but as I described in that message that I didn't directly direct to you It was a poor example.. As of why I didn't mention the Sako at the first message it's these damn youtube comment character restrictions. It's very difficult to write one's opinion clearly in such a short burst of words.
Kekkon3n 8 months ago
That example wasn't probably the best. But translated to various languages they might differ. Like one time I saw an avid American gun enthusiast who was blaming loudly on everyone who mistakenly called an m14 an "assault rifle" since it's a "battle rifle". Also nowadays I wonder can it be called a DMR ;).
When in my language there there is no other translation in the dictionary for the word "Battle rifle" other than Rynnäkkökivääri (RK) which of course means "Assault rifle"... Peace out..
Kekkon3n 8 months ago
@Kekkon3n Very true, there are many people who think they are more informed than they really are and then spread bad info to others who then keep spreading it.... The M-14 could likely carry either moniker these days depending on how it was equipped.
sorryociffer 8 months ago
@Dano78229 DUH YOU IS A DUM ASS THAT CANT SPEL AND HAS A SHIT CEYBORD THATS LOKED ON CAPS
TheAlexagius 9 months ago
their so loud
wesleysnipessss 1 year ago
a bullet came outta the ejection port?!?
esowaych 1 year ago
it seems to me that H.K just keeps shitting out weapons. ( not that the weapons are bad) but im pretty sure Germany produces the most weapons.
eliminatr1221 1 year ago
this gun is dog shit
crashdummy40 1 year ago
@forsberg2010 you dumb piece of shit you can hunt with these. You can own full-auto post-ban rifles here in the us and think for just a moment if your country was invaded by a foreign force I guarantee you would want to find the nearest "assault" rifle you could find. And just to rub it in your face I personally own 12 ak-47 variant rifles 23 m-4 and m-14 style rifles and god only knows how many shotguns, other rifles, and pistols I own.
TheStevenstatzer 1 year ago
@TheStevenstatzer Lol wut. Why so many of the same? why not mix it up a bit? A little .30 cal here, a .338 there and a bit of .408 cheytac mixed in with the rest :3
ELITEHAMSTER123 1 year ago