mike i know you are long winded .....make a 6 min video so more poeple will watch....this a big problem .....but most poeple will not watch a hour long
OPED NEWS (OEN) May 21st, 2011: Connecticut Court Administration Assumes Anti-FOIA Policy After Spending Millions To Do The Opposite -with opening comment by Vince Valvo, ex- president of the Freedom Of Information Council.
Practice Book and Code of Evidence Revisions: "Sec. 25-62. ..no person may be appointed as guardian ad litem until he or she has completed the comprehensive training program for all family division guardians ad litem sponsored by the Judicial Branch"
Well, these new changes they want put in , ...in context ADMIT Sponsorship by the Judicial Branch.
These are no "Events" that Judicial officials merely were invited to.
The Family Commission is FLIP-FLOPPING ONCE AGAIN!
Mr. Nowacki reveals the excuse The Family Commission had on docs sent to him as to why they were exempt from FOIA is because GAL trainings are "events" as opposed to "administrative functions related to the Institutional internal machinery of managing the courts". How ridiculous, clear attempt to skirt the issue and avoid responsibility. Judges require honesty and integrity from citizens but fail miserably by their own responses to law when they and their commissions are the defendants.
The Court Task Force spent years forming FOIA rules on tax $, then contradict by now saying "Oh, we made a mistake, Public Hearings ARE NOT Administrative Acts subject to FOIA." .. the Commission's defense in Nowacki Case, they are trying to dismiss on point the FOIA Commission does not have Jurisdiction. There goes "Transparency, the hallmark of FOIA. All of the Judicial Task Force initiatives are laid waste due to flip-flopping, bottom line courts do not want FOIA. All there in Video.
As usuall the arrogance of the public officials judges is like cancer in the courts-degrade criminalize discredit any citizen who seeks justic-a person of integrity will will not use their opinion but the law and oath they are suppossed to uphold-a good parent will never bow down to injustice and so many times officials under fire hate the truth the citizen exposes!
CASE STATUS FOIA COMM: Attorney Perpetua, the Hearing Officer for this case, cannot respond to your e-mail as the case is still open.
As you know, there was a hearing on 4/11/11 – the Hearing Officer’s Report has not yet been completed. Once it is completed, the parties will receive copies of the report and it will go before the FOI Commission for approval. At this time, there is no estimate as to when the report will be completed.
Daniel Gross v. Probate: The fight continues.
By Rick Green on November 4, 2009
look it up
Kimberlywigglesworth 7 months ago
mike i know you are long winded .....make a 6 min video so more poeple will watch....this a big problem .....but most poeple will not watch a hour long
Kimberlywigglesworth 7 months ago
mike i know you are long winded .....make a 6 min video so more poeple will watch....this a big problem .....but most poeple will watch a hour long
Kimberlywigglesworth 7 months ago
OPED NEWS (OEN) May 21st, 2011: Connecticut Court Administration Assumes Anti-FOIA Policy After Spending Millions To Do The Opposite -with opening comment by Vince Valvo, ex- president of the Freedom Of Information Council.
frankknee 9 months ago
Practice Book and Code of Evidence Revisions: "Sec. 25-62. ..no person may be appointed as guardian ad litem until he or she has completed the comprehensive training program for all family division guardians ad litem sponsored by the Judicial Branch"
Well, these new changes they want put in , ...in context ADMIT Sponsorship by the Judicial Branch.
These are no "Events" that Judicial officials merely were invited to.
The Family Commission is FLIP-FLOPPING ONCE AGAIN!
frankknee 9 months ago
Mr. Nowacki reveals the excuse The Family Commission had on docs sent to him as to why they were exempt from FOIA is because GAL trainings are "events" as opposed to "administrative functions related to the Institutional internal machinery of managing the courts". How ridiculous, clear attempt to skirt the issue and avoid responsibility. Judges require honesty and integrity from citizens but fail miserably by their own responses to law when they and their commissions are the defendants.
frankknee 9 months ago
The Court Task Force spent years forming FOIA rules on tax $, then contradict by now saying "Oh, we made a mistake, Public Hearings ARE NOT Administrative Acts subject to FOIA." .. the Commission's defense in Nowacki Case, they are trying to dismiss on point the FOIA Commission does not have Jurisdiction. There goes "Transparency, the hallmark of FOIA. All of the Judicial Task Force initiatives are laid waste due to flip-flopping, bottom line courts do not want FOIA. All there in Video.
frankknee 9 months ago
FYI:
Docket #FIC 2010-699,
Michael Nowacki v. State of Connecticut, Judicial Branch, Family Commission.
frankknee 9 months ago
As usuall the arrogance of the public officials judges is like cancer in the courts-degrade criminalize discredit any citizen who seeks justic-a person of integrity will will not use their opinion but the law and oath they are suppossed to uphold-a good parent will never bow down to injustice and so many times officials under fire hate the truth the citizen exposes!
alandant1 10 months ago
CASE STATUS FOIA COMM: Attorney Perpetua, the Hearing Officer for this case, cannot respond to your e-mail as the case is still open.
As you know, there was a hearing on 4/11/11 – the Hearing Officer’s Report has not yet been completed. Once it is completed, the parties will receive copies of the report and it will go before the FOI Commission for approval. At this time, there is no estimate as to when the report will be completed.
Petrea Jones, Acting Clerk of the Commission
frankknee 10 months ago