All of the candidates are bs politics as usual politicians, both Democrats and Republicans...except for Dr. Ron Paul! Follow the money...he's a fiscal conservative! He's the only one against the war from start to present! He's the only one who understands and follows the Constitution! Think about it!
Does anybody realize that unless we get rid of the federal reserve we're not gonna have true change? Please people do your research on the federal Reserve. Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate on both sides with the balls to fight them.
BUSH ALLOWS FOREIGN INVASION OF TEXAS: Mexican troops murdered former Rio Bravo mayor, a US federal legislator and 4 others US federal agents yesterday, Jan.8th, on US soil. OUR Federal agents prevented local reporters from accessing the scene, roughing up photographers and threatening others with arrest.DEMAND EXPLANATIONS! USELESS SENATORS, MAYORS & GOVERNORS MAKE USELESS PRESIDENTS! KNOW--B4 U VOTE
Republicans do not give a flying patooty about anyone - for them it is always money, and they do not care about children, or victims of abuse, for that matter.
I am voting for either Obama or Hillary - whoever is running, as long as they are Democrat.
what about democrats and unborn babies? Democrats just want to hand people everything. Most just want a bunch of pussies who dont work for shit. you would have loved the soviet union
Hillary is a fraud. I live in western new york. and she hasn't done shyit. Everyone knew why she became our senator and that was to run for predident in 08. She doesnt care about anything accept winning. She is a smelly dog. I'm all for having a woman president. there are some smart lovley women out there. women could rule the world. But not this dried up old hag.
haha aaaww hillary got sand in her vagina. hillary, we want change from the changes you made. you may have supported some "change" bills, but so did obama and edwards. the truth is you voted for the iraq war, you messed up on healthcare, and you don't want to talk to our enemies, and you are content with osama chilling in pakistan without doing anything about it, and you don't have policies to make us oil independent. all in all, you record of "change" is not that great.
edwards did a smart thing by attacking hilary with supporting obama. what he is trying to do is make this a race between him and obama. i think he is gambling on people supporting him over obama. i dont think it is going to happen
Edwards is talking about systematic change in the process of governance with a bunch of debatingheads who want to talk about repainting the Titanic deckchairs before they get rearranged.
I don't think any of these candidates have the ability to even identify the problems facing America, let alone the ability to resolve them. The Republicans are even worse.
GO away history. Obama brought the two parties together in Illinois to reform the death penalty and expand health care to children. You haven't done anything. I talked to New Yorkers. Go away. Your dream is dead.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Atta- girl Hillary! Tell those losers how it is! Edwards has already proven he is a loser on two occasions: he lost the Democratic nomination in '04 and he lost the vice presidency as well. So he has already had two shots, why should he get another?- He Shouldnt. And Obama talks teh talk but can he walk the walk?- I dont think so.
Type dollar diversify into the google search engine. Every country on the planet that has not dumped our dollars is in the process of doing so. If your candidate does not have a plan to save the dollar you should at least make sure they have a plan to keep the soup lines running smoothly.
Type dollar diversify into the google search engine. Every country on the planet that has not dumped our dollar already has a plan to do so. If your candidate does not have a plan to save the dollar you should at least make sure they have a plan to keep the soup lines running smoothly.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Barack Hussein Osama's muslim roots should help the muslim world to love the USA. We'll have new understanding about muslim beliefs in making women subordinates to paranoid men, stoning to death bad girls, gays and treating dogs not as pets.President "Feel Good" will make us very popular with Mecca. Imagine Osama Bin Laden hanging out at the WhiteHouse and sleeping in the Lincoln bedroom. Change is what Barack Hussein Osama has for all of us! GOD HELP WITH MR OSAMA..MY VOTE IS FOR HILLARY
eventvisionsinc - Who's paying you to "swift-boat" Senator Obama? If you're really a Democrat (I doubt it), then keep your Karl Rove inspired attacks to yourself.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Barack Hussein Osama's muslim roots should help the muslim world to love the USA. We'll have new understanding about muslim beliefs in making women subordinates to paranoid men, stoning to death bad girls, gays and treating dogs not as pets.President "Feel Good" will make us very popular with Mecca. Imagine Osama Bin Laden hanging out at the WhiteHouse and sleeping in the Lincoln bedroom. Change is what Barack Hussein Osama has for all of us! GOD HELP WITH MR OSAMA..MY VOTE IS FOR HILLARY
Gotta admit that Edwards' trying to align himself with Barack is shrewd as h#ll. And his attempt to neutralize Hillary's attacks from behind (barely 3rd place) may just work. Every time she hits, he and Barack can now respond: "There's the entrenched status quo establishment talking."
Finally the REAL Hillary comes out, and it's not pretty. This is the face of the mean, spiteful, entitled establishment Hillary that can't believe that anyone would DARE stand up to her. This country belongs to HER, damnit! The Imperial Presidency must live on.
For the first time in years, I feel we have an excellent pool of dem candidates. I'll take any of them! I agree an Obama/Edwards ticket would be solid.
Our next President will be elected on who can say "change" more. Pathetic. Real change shouldn't be needed if we would of kept to our constitution! Yes, keep saying change and ingore our weak dollar, the up coming recession, 4 million people about to go homeless, china, our Empire making us go broke. The only change here is Ron Paul! Change back to America!
You're ignorant because you never saw why he voted against it. It has nothing to do with race relations. It has nothing to do with racism, it has to do with the Constitution and private property rights. That bill stole a lot of land from people and then under minded their private property rights, which would then the government would use to steal land.
Many other people voted against it for the same reason. You're the kind of person who hears something and thinks that they now know everything. Why don't you read a book or something? Ron Paul is For the Constitution and that means everyone is created equal!
You're Ignorance in its purest form. Innocent. Constitutional rule is form of Government NOT some old 1700's method! Our dollar is worth barely 1 cent to the dollar back when we use a constitutional monetary system. And the constitution is NOT isolationism AT ALL! It says to stay out of entangle alliances. The kind that started WWI. It's meant to limit government so we can have a Free market which is the ONLY WAY countries can move forward! I mean seriously Read a book.
"And the constitution is NOT isolationism AT ALL!"
Yea I know, I never suggested that, I was referring to Ron Paul when I said "isolationism" because those are the ideals he pushes and that's exactly what I don't want.
BTW anyone that knows anything about economics can tell you free market doesn't work for everything, including health care.
Ron Paul doesn't push for ANY isolation ideas at ALL! He just wants to End our empire, which is causing us to go bankrupt and get us out of the UN and entanlging alliances like the constitution says. First thing the UN did to the US is drag Truman to war and now they are talking about regulating our drugs. You're confused between Globalism and US sovereignty.
Also MANY economist and the traders on Wall street love Ron Paul for his ideas on Free market and sound money, so I think you're confused there too. The kinda healthcare you want is like a Welfare State style, which I can tell you doesn't work. It only gives government more control.
I'm sick of all of these cliches. Obama never takes a position on anything, he just uses cliches and talks about "solving problems" and "bringing people together" and "change".
wow Veracifier, thanks for being honest with this video - the last Hilary video takes her comments out of context - without Edwards' preface, her message has a different tone. Obama looks like he doesn't need to be there. He does.
You're right, this shows the full context of the discussion. Obama alluded to the fact that Clinton has gone on the 'offensive' and started the process of distorting Obama's record. Edwards used his time to defend Obama from Clinton's attacks, and mention change. And Clinton's caustic response is now in full context, which honestly doesn't do much for people like myself that felt that she showed more bitterness than I want from a President. Obama kept cool in the face of attack, she didn't.
just so you know - we are in agreement. Just for the record- I wasn't defending Clinton, just showing that there's a different meaning when you see an isolated comment and a comment within the context AS a reply to an assumed motive for behavior modification. I don't want a bitter president either. I would love for Kucinich to win :)
yeah she made chages alright, she was fighting for free health care once then when she knew she couldnt win she took the money from the medical lobbys, so she can go fuck herself.
She also voted for the war and the Patriot Act Twice. So did John though. And Obama votes to fund the war and won't promise to get the troops home by 2013. Also none of them have any idea OR plans to fix our dollar or economy.
And SCHIP is a terrible bill that is riding solely on emotional appeal and not off of any practicality. It provides healthcare to tons of people who don't need it.
And a vote to fund the war isn't saying the war is good. And nobody should make promises that they're not sure can be kept.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Dear Veracifier! why are fixed only on the so called "democrats"? ....isn't this boring for you??? What about some information about true americans with true values?
You americans must learn w/ brazilians to make ellectios and to vote. American ellection is a like a circus, just 2 parties: republican and democrats. In Brazil we vote directly to our president. we dont have anyone to vote for us. We have several parties.
Other thing: we dont like wars! Stop war in Iraq! We hate war!
You also have a disgusting sex-trade, some of the worst pollution in south america, one of the world's highest rates of homicide (four times higher than USA) one of the most appalling economic segreation of any developed country, and some of the more politically corrupt politicians of any democracy.
We're working on our shit here, and we'll get it corrected soon enough, but throwing stones in glass houses...
The U.S. has a federal form of government where a union is formed by the states. The elections reflect this historical fact, as less populated states are given increased weight. While there is a de facto two party system (which is a consequence of the way representatives are elected), third parties do exist.
That's exactly what I think. Obama seems to be the strongest candidate (so far) for Dem nominee, and he and Edwards would be good running mates, in my opinion. However, I personally favor Hillary Clinton.
Obama/Edwards would not be a good ticket. What you need for a P/VP combo is a pair that compensate for each others weaknesses - where one is weak, the other must be strong. I just don't see that in Obama and Edwards.
To be honest with you...after Dick Chenney...I would like to see a VP with less involvement in the White House. No disrespect to Edwards. As for the weak/strong stuff, let Obama fill his cabinet with strength and brains to balance out everything. Look at me, I got Obama President already...I need to slow down...lol.
All of the candidates are bs politics as usual politicians, both Democrats and Republicans...except for Dr. Ron Paul! Follow the money...he's a fiscal conservative! He's the only one against the war from start to present! He's the only one who understands and follows the Constitution! Think about it!
redletterchurch 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Does anybody realize that unless we get rid of the federal reserve we're not gonna have true change? Please people do your research on the federal Reserve. Ron Paul is the ONLY candidate on both sides with the balls to fight them.
rambo6699 4 years ago
BUSH ALLOWS FOREIGN INVASION OF TEXAS: Mexican troops murdered former Rio Bravo mayor, a US federal legislator and 4 others US federal agents yesterday, Jan.8th, on US soil. OUR Federal agents prevented local reporters from accessing the scene, roughing up photographers and threatening others with arrest.DEMAND EXPLANATIONS! USELESS SENATORS, MAYORS & GOVERNORS MAKE USELESS PRESIDENTS! KNOW--B4 U VOTE
gematria79 4 years ago
Republicans do not give a flying patooty about anyone - for them it is always money, and they do not care about children, or victims of abuse, for that matter.
I am voting for either Obama or Hillary - whoever is running, as long as they are Democrat.
KAMIKAZR 4 years ago
what about democrats and unborn babies? Democrats just want to hand people everything. Most just want a bunch of pussies who dont work for shit. you would have loved the soviet union
nickfreije123 4 years ago
healthcare should be for everone regardless of age
moparman1982 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
go hillary for president.... edwards is a faggot
ecuamericans 4 years ago
hilary is a dyke
nickfreije123 4 years ago
Hillary is a fraud. I live in western new york. and she hasn't done shyit. Everyone knew why she became our senator and that was to run for predident in 08. She doesnt care about anything accept winning. She is a smelly dog. I'm all for having a woman president. there are some smart lovley women out there. women could rule the world. But not this dried up old hag.
ambrose2124 4 years ago
I've done research on her work in the senate for New York and you are terribly wrong.
jc1104 3 years ago
Yes!!!! What an amazingly " FRESH " new start for America!! Omama/Edwards!!!
Poor Hillary, crying those alligator tears.....it was just a matter of time. bye bye
chuckinla 4 years ago 2
haha aaaww hillary got sand in her vagina. hillary, we want change from the changes you made. you may have supported some "change" bills, but so did obama and edwards. the truth is you voted for the iraq war, you messed up on healthcare, and you don't want to talk to our enemies, and you are content with osama chilling in pakistan without doing anything about it, and you don't have policies to make us oil independent. all in all, you record of "change" is not that great.
eldiablo10028 4 years ago
Hillary is panicking! Haha. They underestimated the power of a movement. NH doesn't like angry...
kosseo 4 years ago
OBAMA for president.
Thesouthman 4 years ago 4
Man, I've never heard such a enthusiastic discussion about change. It's just a few cents and they can't get over it.
Polytical 4 years ago 2
I found this video much entertaining. Thank you America. :)
Political Analyst
France
WayOfDiplomacy 4 years ago
edwards did a smart thing by attacking hilary with supporting obama. what he is trying to do is make this a race between him and obama. i think he is gambling on people supporting him over obama. i dont think it is going to happen
maharajakal 4 years ago
But the obama/edwards ticket sounds pretty good.
HiArianne 4 years ago
hilary is a bitch. america doesnt want a bitch for a president
stevehwan 4 years ago 2
Hillary is becoming more and more shrill and witchy!!! She's going down the toilet and she's not happy about it!!! LOL!!!!! It's fun to watch!
chuckinla 4 years ago 3
isnt it, this is bringing out the REAL Hillary
NHMntnHIGH 4 years ago 2
Edwards nailed her on this one.
simonineurope 4 years ago
Good response from Hillary.
darksideofthenation 4 years ago
change? sounds like the same old bullshit to me....and where da fuck is kucinich's voice in all of this?
MojoJuana 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
each of the 3 of them would doom this this country if elected. lets pray its a republican who wins. I wish Jeb Bush would run!
sinatra222 4 years ago
newsflash, sinatra222...this country is already doomed under bush.
MojoJuana 4 years ago
By change, they mean socailizm
12u34me 4 years ago
Edwards is talking about systematic change in the process of governance with a bunch of debatingheads who want to talk about repainting the Titanic deckchairs before they get rearranged.
annarboriter 4 years ago
I don't think any of these candidates have the ability to even identify the problems facing America, let alone the ability to resolve them. The Republicans are even worse.
MidnightChimes 4 years ago
Hillary's behind at the moment but once she points out that Obama is black, she can make her move. Don't even think that's not in her playbook. :)
MidnightChimes 4 years ago
I think the Obama people are prepared for that. Like saying Hillary's a woman that benefited from the same 1964 Civil Rights Act.
But Hillary and Bill wouldn't do that, because that means Bill will have to leave his Harlem office space for betraying the Black voice.
The Republicans may do that too.
nognilk 4 years ago 2
GO away history. Obama brought the two parties together in Illinois to reform the death penalty and expand health care to children. You haven't done anything. I talked to New Yorkers. Go away. Your dream is dead.
ponchocam 4 years ago 3
Oh My God... John Edwards was right!
Anytime you speak for change, the forces of status quo attack (Hillary Clinton)
She attacked at 2:07.
Never really saw her this mad, looks like John Edwards set her up perfectly.
nognilk 4 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Atta- girl Hillary! Tell those losers how it is! Edwards has already proven he is a loser on two occasions: he lost the Democratic nomination in '04 and he lost the vice presidency as well. So he has already had two shots, why should he get another?- He Shouldnt. And Obama talks teh talk but can he walk the walk?- I dont think so.
cheesebob90 4 years ago
Type dollar diversify into the google search engine. Every country on the planet that has not dumped our dollars is in the process of doing so. If your candidate does not have a plan to save the dollar you should at least make sure they have a plan to keep the soup lines running smoothly.
crazycatfguy 4 years ago
You heard them: CHANGE. It is all about delivering change. If you give a candidate a 5 dollar bill, you expect five washingtons in return.
Is there a more empty group of politicians anywhere in the world?
fabiogaucho77 4 years ago
yes
thetubeaccount 4 years ago
Hillary in '08 :)
Snarky1 4 years ago
OBAMA for president.
Thesouthman 4 years ago
Type dollar diversify into the google search engine. Every country on the planet that has not dumped our dollar already has a plan to do so. If your candidate does not have a plan to save the dollar you should at least make sure they have a plan to keep the soup lines running smoothly.
crazycatfguy 4 years ago
OBAMA for president.
Thesouthman 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Barack Hussein Osama's muslim roots should help the muslim world to love the USA. We'll have new understanding about muslim beliefs in making women subordinates to paranoid men, stoning to death bad girls, gays and treating dogs not as pets.President "Feel Good" will make us very popular with Mecca. Imagine Osama Bin Laden hanging out at the WhiteHouse and sleeping in the Lincoln bedroom. Change is what Barack Hussein Osama has for all of us! GOD HELP WITH MR OSAMA..MY VOTE IS FOR HILLARY
eventvisionsinc 4 years ago
paranoid much?
mfyyre 4 years ago 2
eventvisionsinc - Who's paying you to "swift-boat" Senator Obama? If you're really a Democrat (I doubt it), then keep your Karl Rove inspired attacks to yourself.
WadeBlazingame34 4 years ago 2
"Barack Hussein Osama's..."
The amount of your stupidity is so staggering that I don't even believe it.
Yes, because of a middle name given to a man by his parents almost 50 years ago, we shouldn't vote for him...great logic for your decision.
Please hang yourself.
Obama o8
thedrax 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Barack Hussein Osama's muslim roots should help the muslim world to love the USA. We'll have new understanding about muslim beliefs in making women subordinates to paranoid men, stoning to death bad girls, gays and treating dogs not as pets.President "Feel Good" will make us very popular with Mecca. Imagine Osama Bin Laden hanging out at the WhiteHouse and sleeping in the Lincoln bedroom. Change is what Barack Hussein Osama has for all of us! GOD HELP WITH MR OSAMA..MY VOTE IS FOR HILLARY
eventvisionsinc 4 years ago
Hilary Clinton won't change anything.
"Making change is not about what you believe" -hc
really?
I disagree.
In summary -
Obama "Listen to everybody, let's take a step back and critically but objectively think about who's the best choice"
Edwards "Yeah. Obama's cool, I'm going to ride with him straight to Super Duper Tuesday"
Clinton "Obama's a newb"
zackwolk 4 years ago
The whole debate on "change" is meaningless. How many contexts, circumstances and dynamics can we imagine for this ambiguous entity called "change"?
chanman321 4 years ago
Gotta admit that Edwards' trying to align himself with Barack is shrewd as h#ll. And his attempt to neutralize Hillary's attacks from behind (barely 3rd place) may just work. Every time she hits, he and Barack can now respond: "There's the entrenched status quo establishment talking."
WadeBlazingame34 4 years ago
Finally the REAL Hillary comes out, and it's not pretty. This is the face of the mean, spiteful, entitled establishment Hillary that can't believe that anyone would DARE stand up to her. This country belongs to HER, damnit! The Imperial Presidency must live on.
engineer506 4 years ago
For the first time in years, I feel we have an excellent pool of dem candidates. I'll take any of them! I agree an Obama/Edwards ticket would be solid.
bluespiral58 4 years ago
Our next President will be elected on who can say "change" more. Pathetic. Real change shouldn't be needed if we would of kept to our constitution! Yes, keep saying change and ingore our weak dollar, the up coming recession, 4 million people about to go homeless, china, our Empire making us go broke. The only change here is Ron Paul! Change back to America!
Ron Paul 08!!!
BlueTunisia 4 years ago
BlueTunisia, Your entire statement contradicts itself.
Ron Paul's running slogan is "revolution"...right?
"Revolution- noun- the class struggle that is expected to lead to political CHANGE and...."- From the English Oxford Dictionary.
Paul voted against The Civil Rights Act...He's a moron and so are you.
thedrax 4 years ago 2
You're ignorant because you never saw why he voted against it. It has nothing to do with race relations. It has nothing to do with racism, it has to do with the Constitution and private property rights. That bill stole a lot of land from people and then under minded their private property rights, which would then the government would use to steal land.
Ron Paul 08!!!
BlueTunisia 4 years ago
Many other people voted against it for the same reason. You're the kind of person who hears something and thinks that they now know everything. Why don't you read a book or something? Ron Paul is For the Constitution and that means everyone is created equal!
Ron Paul 08!!!
BlueTunisia 4 years ago
"Ron Paul is For the Constitution"
So am I dude but I also realize that time marches on and we can't go back to 1850's Isolationism ideals.
It's a far different world from when the Constitution was written.
It's similar to religious people wanting to go back to living a "biblical existence".
You can do it, it's a free country, but you'll end up living similar to the Amish...and that's not what I want for my country.
I want to go forward..not backward.
thedrax 4 years ago
You're Ignorance in its purest form. Innocent. Constitutional rule is form of Government NOT some old 1700's method! Our dollar is worth barely 1 cent to the dollar back when we use a constitutional monetary system. And the constitution is NOT isolationism AT ALL! It says to stay out of entangle alliances. The kind that started WWI. It's meant to limit government so we can have a Free market which is the ONLY WAY countries can move forward! I mean seriously Read a book.
Ron Paul 08!!!
BlueTunisia 4 years ago
"I mean seriously Read a book."
What would you suggest?..Bastiat? nah thx.
"And the constitution is NOT isolationism AT ALL!"
Yea I know, I never suggested that, I was referring to Ron Paul when I said "isolationism" because those are the ideals he pushes and that's exactly what I don't want.
BTW anyone that knows anything about economics can tell you free market doesn't work for everything, including health care.
thedrax 4 years ago
Ron Paul doesn't push for ANY isolation ideas at ALL! He just wants to End our empire, which is causing us to go bankrupt and get us out of the UN and entanlging alliances like the constitution says. First thing the UN did to the US is drag Truman to war and now they are talking about regulating our drugs. You're confused between Globalism and US sovereignty.
Ron Paul 08!!!
BlueTunisia 4 years ago
Also MANY economist and the traders on Wall street love Ron Paul for his ideas on Free market and sound money, so I think you're confused there too. The kinda healthcare you want is like a Welfare State style, which I can tell you doesn't work. It only gives government more control.
Ron Paul 08!!!
BlueTunisia 4 years ago
"..so I think you're confused there too."
"..which I can tell you doesn't work."
You like to assume you're right a lot don't you.
France, as an example, uses this "welfare state style" health care system and they're rated #1 in the world by more than one source.
The system I want is publicly funded and privately delivered...far from the picture you're trying to paint here.
thedrax 4 years ago
"You're confused between Globalism and US sovereignty."
I am? How's that?
thedrax 4 years ago
I'm sick of all of these cliches. Obama never takes a position on anything, he just uses cliches and talks about "solving problems" and "bringing people together" and "change".
JobDDT 4 years ago 2
wow Veracifier, thanks for being honest with this video - the last Hilary video takes her comments out of context - without Edwards' preface, her message has a different tone. Obama looks like he doesn't need to be there. He does.
zackwolk 4 years ago
You're right, this shows the full context of the discussion. Obama alluded to the fact that Clinton has gone on the 'offensive' and started the process of distorting Obama's record. Edwards used his time to defend Obama from Clinton's attacks, and mention change. And Clinton's caustic response is now in full context, which honestly doesn't do much for people like myself that felt that she showed more bitterness than I want from a President. Obama kept cool in the face of attack, she didn't.
freff 4 years ago
just so you know - we are in agreement. Just for the record- I wasn't defending Clinton, just showing that there's a different meaning when you see an isolated comment and a comment within the context AS a reply to an assumed motive for behavior modification. I don't want a bitter president either. I would love for Kucinich to win :)
zackwolk 4 years ago
yeah she made chages alright, she was fighting for free health care once then when she knew she couldnt win she took the money from the medical lobbys, so she can go fuck herself.
DrCrYz 4 years ago 4
Fuck off.
She created SCHIP you stupid monkey.
volumptuous 4 years ago
She also voted for the war and the Patriot Act Twice. So did John though. And Obama votes to fund the war and won't promise to get the troops home by 2013. Also none of them have any idea OR plans to fix our dollar or economy.
BlueTunisia 4 years ago 3
And SCHIP is a terrible bill that is riding solely on emotional appeal and not off of any practicality. It provides healthcare to tons of people who don't need it.
And a vote to fund the war isn't saying the war is good. And nobody should make promises that they're not sure can be kept.
wooblah22 4 years ago
change...to the NWO! :(
SwobyJ 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Dear Veracifier! why are fixed only on the so called "democrats"? ....isn't this boring for you??? What about some information about true americans with true values?
PetiMisi 4 years ago
The true values of torture? the true values of undermining the constitution? The true values of the war profiteering?
copcorona 4 years ago
I did it, me me me me me!!!
jankyflava 4 years ago 2
I did it, me me me me me!!!
jankyflava 4 years ago
You americans must learn w/ brazilians to make ellectios and to vote. American ellection is a like a circus, just 2 parties: republican and democrats. In Brazil we vote directly to our president. we dont have anyone to vote for us. We have several parties.
Other thing: we dont like wars! Stop war in Iraq! We hate war!
Go home yankees!
arabe45 4 years ago
You also have a disgusting sex-trade, some of the worst pollution in south america, one of the world's highest rates of homicide (four times higher than USA) one of the most appalling economic segreation of any developed country, and some of the more politically corrupt politicians of any democracy.
We're working on our shit here, and we'll get it corrected soon enough, but throwing stones in glass houses...
volumptuous 4 years ago 2
The U.S. has a federal form of government where a union is formed by the states. The elections reflect this historical fact, as less populated states are given increased weight. While there is a de facto two party system (which is a consequence of the way representatives are elected), third parties do exist.
claytongault 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
VOTE RON PAUL
trudrewski 4 years ago
I don't know if Edwards would ever accept a VP spot again, but a Obama/Edwards ticket would be hard to beat.
creole60 4 years ago 2
That's exactly what I think. Obama seems to be the strongest candidate (so far) for Dem nominee, and he and Edwards would be good running mates, in my opinion. However, I personally favor Hillary Clinton.
Josephdorf03 4 years ago
Obama/Edwards would not be a good ticket. What you need for a P/VP combo is a pair that compensate for each others weaknesses - where one is weak, the other must be strong. I just don't see that in Obama and Edwards.
claytongault 4 years ago
To be honest with you...after Dick Chenney...I would like to see a VP with less involvement in the White House. No disrespect to Edwards. As for the weak/strong stuff, let Obama fill his cabinet with strength and brains to balance out everything. Look at me, I got Obama President already...I need to slow down...lol.
creole60 4 years ago
I think more and more people will feel comfortable with an Obama/Edwards ticket.
nognilk 4 years ago 3
nognik, maybe that's the case among Democrats, but I don't think that such a ticket would work well when the field of voters widens later in '08.
claytongault 4 years ago