@||Andy1994|| You are tryng to compare a 2008 engine and a 1998's engine. There are 10 years between. IDTech 3 is historical, and frostbite is very recent. Like tryng to compare a stadium with the colosseum. That's absolutely idiot. And frostbite isn't so better than IDTech 3. That animations could be obtained in both engines. But having 5.000 modellers that makes Ultra-HD weapons, and being a little group of voluntaries are two different situations. That's why battelfield's got a better graphic
@IIAndy1994II DICE just did the engine. The models (so the animation and the graphic) was made by Ultra-paid professional modellers, that could do the same animations on IDTech3
Dude, dont try to compare Frostbite 2 and Id Tech 3.
Just remember that Id tech 3 was coded in 1998, by the ID Software, just 14 years ago. Frostbite 2 was coded in 2008. There are 10 years of difference between them. You absolutely haven't played Quake 3, you didn't appreciate the best engine for 3d games in 1998. And you absolutely don't know that almost ALL the fps are from Quake III. Ok, in 2026 i'll do a video, comparising Frostbite 2 to IDtech 11. We'll see then who's the best.
@IIAndy1994II You talked about animations in your video, What do you think? An engine DON'T mean animations. IDTech 3 supports animation just like frostbite.... If Battlefield was made on IDTech 3 it should have the same animations
Those modern warfare games suck... most of all black ops... and that other one with the dead zombies.. lol. Fail.. Frostbite, cry engine, maybe unreal or nothing. Unity sucks.. unreal is not far behind. I never even heard of this ID or IW whatever the fuck it is. No one in the industry is buzzing about that shit. good caparison.
@prodigyset420 and for the dumbass some messages below me.. I care about graphics and the game.. you can't have an incomplete like in someting, its like your going to have sex but you forgot to call a chick. Fail.
@IIAndy1994II every person who sucks at cod games rants on on how they think battlefield is better than cod rather than admitting they suck at the game... try telling it sucks to the sales statistics... and you know your gonna say 'kids haz codz' to make urself look better but face it bf fanboys, you guys sucked at cod & moved to a slower & more campier game.
@IIAndy1994II i do like battlefield, but their is a huge amount of players that play it is because they suck at cod so they camp heavily in corners, i wish there was more teamwork & skilled players in bf3... and at least talk! it feels like an empty experience n very boring. these are the reasons why bf games arn't as good as cod
@MasterFProductions Nah i played cod since cod 2, played on CB and everything. Cod sucks now days. The only cod playable game today is Cod4 modded with promod. So you can take your Awesome MW2.5 and IW that just wants money, play it stfu and don't fucking comment on a BF video ever again.
@szepiz no, every Call of Duty uses id Tech 3 except Call of Duty 2 (id Tech 4), and that's pretty ridiculous, using a 12 years old engine (Quake III Arena) for a 2011 game, but anyway I don't care about graphics/realism or someshit, I get bored with Battlefield, and I enjoy Call of Duty (don't take me like a codfag retarded), I'm not sayin' Battlefield sucks, but it's just boring (for me), that's all :P
@seriousremus896 okay,i really tought cod series using id tech 4,and i think there is no problem with the id tech 3,graphic is not what a game need,story,a good story what call of duty need
@szepiz well I don't give a shit about graphics, when I play "X" game, the one thing I want is fun, about id Tech 3 I just see that ridiculous, anyway, the main thing I want is fun, but normally the most appreciated thing by me in a game is the soundtrack (look at Rangers MW2 theme or Black Ops Op40 theme) :P
Its so fuckin obvious that the person who made this video is a BF3 Fanboy. hes using background music and good singleplayer gameplays from BF3, but only a fuckin map from Black Ops with no audio??
They should use what RAGE is using, ID TECH 5. Rage runs at 60 FPS on consoles and looks better then Call of Duty, so maybe they will adopt that engine
@MyHD2AndOthers Nope if you're going to sell a game using the Id tech 5 engine you need to sell it under Bethesda. And that will never happen. Although ID tech 4 is soon to be released as Open source so if they are going to switch engine it's to the free new one.
Why are you comparing the already 14 year old id tech 3 with the recent Frostbite 2 engine? . . . . . . . . Of course id tech 3 is better Duh! ;)
lllDASH 2 days ago
@||Andy1994|| You are tryng to compare a 2008 engine and a 1998's engine. There are 10 years between. IDTech 3 is historical, and frostbite is very recent. Like tryng to compare a stadium with the colosseum. That's absolutely idiot. And frostbite isn't so better than IDTech 3. That animations could be obtained in both engines. But having 5.000 modellers that makes Ultra-HD weapons, and being a little group of voluntaries are two different situations. That's why battelfield's got a better graphic
Kappasecondus 2 weeks ago
@Kappasecondus or because DICE are awesome. Swedish quality!
IIAndy1994II 2 weeks ago
@IIAndy1994II DICE just did the engine. The models (so the animation and the graphic) was made by Ultra-paid professional modellers, that could do the same animations on IDTech3
Kappasecondus 2 weeks ago
@Kappasecondus everything is made by DICE employees. U mad bro?
IIAndy1994II 2 weeks ago
Dude, dont try to compare Frostbite 2 and Id Tech 3.
Just remember that Id tech 3 was coded in 1998, by the ID Software, just 14 years ago. Frostbite 2 was coded in 2008. There are 10 years of difference between them. You absolutely haven't played Quake 3, you didn't appreciate the best engine for 3d games in 1998. And you absolutely don't know that almost ALL the fps are from Quake III. Ok, in 2026 i'll do a video, comparising Frostbite 2 to IDtech 11. We'll see then who's the best.
Kappasecondus 3 weeks ago
@Kappasecondus Call of Duty is using a modified version of Id Tech 3 and Battlefield 3 is using Frostbite 2. What´s the problem?
IIAndy1994II 3 weeks ago
@IIAndy1994II You talked about animations in your video, What do you think? An engine DON'T mean animations. IDTech 3 supports animation just like frostbite.... If Battlefield was made on IDTech 3 it should have the same animations
Kappasecondus 2 weeks ago
@Kappasecondus please shut up and enjoy the video.
IIAndy1994II 2 weeks ago
@IIAndy1994II What about audio? LOL wtf it seems just frostbite supports audio (???) .
;) Just jokin good video what Movie Maker do you use?
Kappasecondus 2 weeks ago
Those modern warfare games suck... most of all black ops... and that other one with the dead zombies.. lol. Fail.. Frostbite, cry engine, maybe unreal or nothing. Unity sucks.. unreal is not far behind. I never even heard of this ID or IW whatever the fuck it is. No one in the industry is buzzing about that shit. good caparison.
prodigyset420 1 month ago
@prodigyset420 and for the dumbass some messages below me.. I care about graphics and the game.. you can't have an incomplete like in someting, its like your going to have sex but you forgot to call a chick. Fail.
prodigyset420 1 month ago
id tech 5 :D vs frosetible 1?? whi the hell you dont compare the lastest id tech vesion dumbass
wallertdwp 1 month ago
@wallertdwp Because I am comparing Battlefield 3 engine and Recycle of dutys engine
IIAndy1994II 1 month ago
@IIAndy1994II fail
prodigyset420 1 month ago
@wallertdwp and CALL OF DUTY USING SELF EINGIE :P in start ( COD 1/2 it is ID TECH 3 ) now its COD ENGINE built only for COD :)
1DAKU 4 weeks ago
Why do you flame the Id Tech:(
IW is based on IdT3.
It is same as I say this engine based on IdT3 sucks -> /watch?v=vWkhyIeEfjY
Please,rename it as the Frostbite 2 vs IW 3.0 modifed
gnert1111 1 month ago
@gnert1111 This is just a comparison video. Don´t get mad
IIAndy1994II 1 month ago
@IIAndy1994II
Yes,but still it should be Iwinity Ward instead Id Tech 3 :P
gnert1111 1 month ago
they should just move to newer unreal or crysis engine for next CoD.
They can't create their own engine so why not just get the newer modern engine from other game devs.
HLM190586 2 months ago
but cod is a etter game... so who cares... enjoy getting a boner looking at textures
MasterFProductions 2 months ago
@MasterFProductions Battlefield 3 is way better than Modern Warfare 2.5.
IIAndy1994II 2 months ago in playlist Uploaded videos 4
@IIAndy1994II every person who sucks at cod games rants on on how they think battlefield is better than cod rather than admitting they suck at the game... try telling it sucks to the sales statistics... and you know your gonna say 'kids haz codz' to make urself look better but face it bf fanboys, you guys sucked at cod & moved to a slower & more campier game.
MasterFProductions 2 months ago 2
@MasterFProductions Actually i´m quite good at Cod but thanks for sharing your argument!
IIAndy1994II 2 months ago
@IIAndy1994II i do like battlefield, but their is a huge amount of players that play it is because they suck at cod so they camp heavily in corners, i wish there was more teamwork & skilled players in bf3... and at least talk! it feels like an empty experience n very boring. these are the reasons why bf games arn't as good as cod
MasterFProductions 2 months ago
@MasterFProductions i'm better at mw3 than bf3 but i preffeer bf3 becouse easy is boooooooooooooooring
iva1971and10012 1 month ago
@MasterFProductions Nah i played cod since cod 2, played on CB and everything. Cod sucks now days. The only cod playable game today is Cod4 modded with promod. So you can take your Awesome MW2.5 and IW that just wants money, play it stfu and don't fucking comment on a BF video ever again.
lenflancer 1 month ago
its id tech 4...
szepiz 2 months ago
@szepiz no, every Call of Duty uses id Tech 3 except Call of Duty 2 (id Tech 4), and that's pretty ridiculous, using a 12 years old engine (Quake III Arena) for a 2011 game, but anyway I don't care about graphics/realism or someshit, I get bored with Battlefield, and I enjoy Call of Duty (don't take me like a codfag retarded), I'm not sayin' Battlefield sucks, but it's just boring (for me), that's all :P
seriousremus896 2 months ago
@seriousremus896 okay,i really tought cod series using id tech 4,and i think there is no problem with the id tech 3,graphic is not what a game need,story,a good story what call of duty need
szepiz 2 months ago
@szepiz well I don't give a shit about graphics, when I play "X" game, the one thing I want is fun, about id Tech 3 I just see that ridiculous, anyway, the main thing I want is fun, but normally the most appreciated thing by me in a game is the soundtrack (look at Rangers MW2 theme or Black Ops Op40 theme) :P
seriousremus896 2 months ago
Frostbite 2 = New engine (1 years maybe)
Id tech 3 = 12 years ;D
jilflapflap87 3 months ago
It's funny because mw3 does run on I'd tech 3
lingling0432219507 3 months ago
@lingling0432219507 yes it does , iwengine is the id thech heavily modified
AERTOBOTON123 2 months ago
@AERTOBOTON123 not hevily modified its just texture resolution enhance iw engine is based on quaqe 3 engine (idtech 3 but with no registered name)
Boryspitzanzx 2 months ago
Its so fuckin obvious that the person who made this video is a BF3 Fanboy. hes using background music and good singleplayer gameplays from BF3, but only a fuckin map from Black Ops with no audio??
nurithetiger 4 months ago
@nurithetiger even so, you do realize mw3 is running on a quake III engine right?
splicer931 3 months ago
Trololololol.
davethebufanda 4 months ago
Subscribe him to support hes a really underrated comentator and player! :) Hes a fucking awesome friend too.
Nuk3Fruit 4 months ago
lol
ramodesign 4 months ago
They should use what RAGE is using, ID TECH 5. Rage runs at 60 FPS on consoles and looks better then Call of Duty, so maybe they will adopt that engine
MyHD2AndOthers 4 months ago
@MyHD2AndOthers Nope if you're going to sell a game using the Id tech 5 engine you need to sell it under Bethesda. And that will never happen. Although ID tech 4 is soon to be released as Open source so if they are going to switch engine it's to the free new one.
AcidRain371 4 months ago
lmaooooooo best video ever
ak50cal 4 months ago
wow id tech 3 gets shat on by frostbite 2
grometmate 4 months ago
i think id tech 3 has better graphics
UntouchableX7 4 months ago 2
@UntouchableX7
Then you're blind.
Archer2509 4 months ago
Frostbite 2 = win.
Id tech 3 = fail.
OhAddict 4 months ago 12
Nailed it.
kakeshoma 4 months ago
hahah epic
teehnube 4 months ago
Comment removed
AcidRain371 4 months ago
BO använder nt ID3 ne e MW serien som gör :p
SuperSwenen 4 months ago
@SuperSwenen det är en modifierad version av id tech 3
IIAndy1994II 4 months ago 5