Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Gitmo Detainees

[smokin56guy]

Let's send them ALL to Chicago land...into the waiting arms of another fine group of America haters,,,jessy jackson,luis farakoon,rev wright.danny glover etc etc etc.

[hadtohappen]

I wish people could get all riled up for the rights of those who seek to LEGALLY immigrate to the USA. My wife was denied an entry visa by one consulate beaurocrat acting a jugde jury and executionor. Terrorist and Illegals have lobbies in their favor. LOL! That will teach me to follow the rules. hahaha.

[FlyontheWallinFLA]

WATCH "Gitmo/Obama Protest - flag at half staff" and join with this personal protest against the start of the dismantling of our security apparatus. Write your representatives and demand that if OBAMA is going to close GITMO that another secure site OUTSIDE the USA be found to house these individuals.

[nolibsinmycircle]

The Geneva Convention did'nt save my Dad or Uncle during WW2, both parished in prisoner of war camps. So it only pertains to our prisoners. I believe in no quarter given in warfare. you quit fighting your dead. I felt that way in VIetnam and I'm here and a lot of them on the other side are'nt. Sleep well every night.

[NeptuneMovies222]

If there is no evidence to support their detainment, then there is no evidence to prove they are terrorists. Just as Springin05 said, why can't they face the justice system? The Constitution is perfectly clear, that all persons, convicted of crimes in the United States must be held to the same rights as it's citizens.

[Boarderhopper1]

@NeptuneMovies222

sure but most werent in the united states, most were not citizens, most were caught in war zone during declared war times. AUMF says they have no rights, even american citizens have no rights even if they are caught on american soil so long as they are designated "enemy combatant" by the president himself. personally if an american citizen was detaineed, then sure lets show proof. but non citizens are generally screwed, the Geneva Convention is meaninless these days.

[Springin05]

Why would you be afraid to have all of the people face the justice system? Everyone has a right to a fair trial and you cannot just assume guilt. Many of these detainees were turned over and claimed to be terrorists by other people for money. If Bush had done things properly to begin with and followed the law and the constitution we wouldn't have to deal with this mess.

[Boarderhopper1]

@Springin05

look up "enemy combatants" and the AUMF. he is following the constitution and all the laws that come with it.

[truthnow08]

Nazi's called them Asocials,

We call them Terrorists.

Bring Habeus Corpus back

[anthonyo4]

America is paying the price for its crap foreign policy and they go about it by creating more enemies. There are some nut jobs who are obsessed with blowing shit up but some of those people have done nothing wrong and should be given a fair trial. Terrosism has won in america they didnt have to destroy your beliefs, constitution or way of life because they have scard the american people into destroying it themselves.

[Vegasoon]

Why would anyone fear allowing a prisoner proper due process? No to do so is to condone Vietnam's indefinite holding of American POWs. Only an anti-American would want to see us become like our enemies.

[TheSurvivalist]

Sure give the terrorist freedom, and then theyll be back hitting us the first chance they get. The americans who are trying to release the detaniees (terrorists) are traitors to america

[NKA23]

There are hundreds of detainees in gitmo...only ten of them had been put to court yet and none of them could be proven guilty of being connected to Al-Quaida or any kind of terrorism at all.

Just imagine for a minute that maybe ALL or MOST of those imprisoned are innocent...

Can you take the responsibility of your country for holding and torturing COMPLETELY INNOCENT PEOPLE in prison for years and years not even giving them a chance to be free again ?

The supreme court´s decision is right.

[nerdynicabus]

LOL! i guess we could call this homegrown terrorism. supreme court WANTS more terrorism in our country by helping terrorists out! THEY ARE PRISONERS OF WAR!! WHO GIVES A FUCK WHETHER THEY DIE OR NOT. THEY ARE PEOPLE WHO DONT CARE ABOUT KILLING INNOCENT PEOPLE, SO WHY SHOULD WE CARE ABOUT KILLING THEM?!?!?

[sierraMamaProd]

The Court's decision will never have the impacts that Scalia claims. Freedom and security can be reconciled within the framework of the rule of law and constitution. We have many bad people in jail, all of whom had lawyers and access to writs of habeas corpus. Scalia and others are just "cut and running" on basic civil rights!

[Poole1Dan]

This is a bullshit decision for two reasons:

1. These POW's aren't even citiznes, so how are they entitled to any constitutional rights?

2. Why do we the taxpayers have to pay for the trials of POW's who are more likely then not, terrorists?

Horrible call. Until this war is over, we have the right to hold these POW's indefinitely

[SlapEveryJew]

This is the most unconstitutional thing.

[ClassicFIHD]

Did Obama just say he supports Bin Laden being tried in the US Courts?

[Iraqgenocide6]

I have met many muslims, and surprise.. they are normal people; some of them are very religious just like Christians. I never met a "radical jihadist" but then again I never met a radical Christan like Timothy McVeigh. It's stupidity to call 1.4 billion people in all walks & jobs in life in all countries radicals. If you are an occupier and someone turns his neighbor in for some cash based on tribal disputes and you send him to Guantanamo on the basis of "radical muslims" there's no hope for you

[bestdayz11]

masses are asses...you should know this billheart....no one understands that for every KSM there are 20 guys picked up for a bounty and just sit there b/c they can't get legal help...not only is is wrong but it probably creates more terrorists than eliminates

[ClassicFIHD]

Lets save millions, just open the gates let them free.

Now when a Soldier captures an Enemy Combatant he has to read them their Miranda Rights and charge them with a crime within 72 hours. So all the captives we have now will probably get off on a technicality if they were not read their Miranda Rights. Can a Solder legally charge someone with a crime? Do they have to be trained and authorize to write a citation? Soldiers now have to collect evidence at the scene while being shot at?

[KARStarla]

Yes! Thank YOU Supreme Court!

[billheartyface]

nothing more sickening than the opinion of the chest thumping masses.

[44MONTEREY]

I heard Baby Bush say he is going to ignore the court just like he ignore all the laws he signs with a statement he is going to ignore them.

[redfarts]

I heard 44monterey is going to go to Gitmo and suck all these terrorist dicks... Go fuck yourself!

[hanzender]

Where do you get your sources from? Might want to stop listening to them so that they don't make you look any more retarded. "I heard". LOL.

[oroweight]

Let's give cookies and candies to the enemy.!!!

People wake up. We are being attack while we

give rights to the enemy that wants our destruction. You do not care for humanity you

are feeling good for your liberal and cowardly

actions. Let us take care of our home first.

American citizens first.

[billheartyface]

we don't "give rights" to anyone...they are inalienable remember? and what is to fear from the courts?...I'll tell you what...that the crimes of torture will be exposed for all to see...your "cookies" comment comes right our of Rummies play book. On behalf of all who love justice...fuck you.

[oroweight]

Enemies do not have rights in our coutry nor foreigners. Only Americans have rights in our

country. This is our home and just like I have no right in your home to eat your food and take over. The enemy has no rights here in America.

If you do not agree that is your choice and I will not use obscenity to you as a sign of my intelligence. That is my choice!

[billheartyface]

oh jesus...you don't have a clue, do you? try boning up on the law the next talk to have an opinion...you'll sound less stupid. of course enemies/foreigners have rights!... and, really, obscenity or not, your idiocy is evident but I pity you because you really don't have a choice.

[ellwyn]

this decision facilitates terrorism within the US, by making it easier for captured terrorists to get released. whether this was the goal of those who support the ruling, or they just wanted a win against bush, it doesn't matter. the fact is that everyone (except terrorists) is a little less safe today because of this decision.

[billheartyface]

bull...do you really want anyone to be locked up forever just because someone called them a terrorist? that includes you also. are you some sort of lawless nut?

[LandOfTheBrave01]

Pardon me!  "which have not been convicted of anything" in several years.

[LandOfTheBrave01]

I find it very troubling that a United States Supreme Court Justice has adopted the language which states "The US is at war with Radical Islamist".

Based on these statements, how can Justice Scalia make a ruling on anything related to the issue with an unbiased opinion? If he views the many accused people picked up by Bush as Radical Islamist, which can be convicted of anything, then where does his level headed reasoning come in to debate the issue as they relate to the Constitution?

[overpaidrockstar1]

This is not a defeat for bush, this is a defeat fo the constitution. The purpose of the supreme court is to folow the law regardless what you think.

Terrorist scum who are NOT CITIZENS of this country now have the rights of americans.

Liberalism is truly a mental disorder and i say that because the majority was led by the self hating jew ruth gator ginsberg

[billheartyface]

there's that racism! So you want everyone NOT A CITIZEN locked up without rights? And, you ignorant cow, the supreme court INTERPRETS the law. I suggest you read Marbury v. Madison for a primer on judical review, ok?

[kondenado1]

You quoting from Michael Savage.Hahahahah

[dv122]

Your response is cruel. My problem is I have no arms or legs. Do you think that's funny. I don't. I hope you think about that. I hope you sleep well at night because without arms or legs I can't. Thank you for your cruelty.

[BitterSweetCracker]

From there, the radical Muslims can build themselves up, "preparing for fitness & then launching Jihad once they strengthen themselves." The trial, taking place in London's Blackfriars Crown Court, charged the three suspects with terrorism-related counts of possessing articles or documents." Damn, more bad guys putting financial strain on the courts at the expense of others. British courts, American courts. Wake up America! Close the borders. Demand justice from the S. Court! bnpDOTorgDOTuk

[qazwas2001]

The BNP? give me a break...

[BitterSweetCracker]

This was found at bnpDOTorgDOTuk: "Plans to set up a secret Islamist state in a remote part of Scotland & from there to wage Jihad, or 'Holy War' were revealed in the trial of four "British Muslims" yesterday. In secret conversations recorded by the police, one of the main conspirators, Aabid Khan, of Bradford, explained the plan as follows: "A group of Muslims can go to a remote place & set up a mini Sharia state & they can rule according to Sharia law, like this & stay there."

[redfarts]

I haven't been a big John McCain fan up till now, but if Obama is going to give us more SC Justices like those five jackholes who voted for giving enemy combatants constitution rights I say McCAIN IN 08!

[Gillz17]

That is exactly Obama will do as President. The voters MUST look past his feel good speeches about "hope" and "unity" to stop these kinds of Supreme Court rulings. This is what liberals do. They don't know when to say when. They are for people's rights but what will they say when one of these likely-soon-to-be released Gitmo prisoners does a terrorist attack on US citzens? These detainees are NOT US citizens. The SC overturned the President AND the Democratic controlled congress! McCain 08!

[BitterSweetCracker]

Gillz17, "The voters MUST look past his feel good speeches about "hope" and "unity" to stop these kinds of Supreme Court rulings." Amen! Americans need to wake up & see what is happening in England with regards to radical Muslims having taken over complete neighborhoods & towns. The native Brits are being overrun. DO WE WANT THAT IN AMERICA? I mean, c'mon. It's crowded enough. We need to close the borders. NO more immigrants for now. Put up a "No Vacancy Sign." Take care of ourselves for awhile.

[billheartyface]

oh no...here come the niggers...put up no vacancy signs quick!!!

[billheartyface]

you're such a coward...willing to sacrifice liberty for a little imagined security. I love how you think only US citizens have rights. everyone that thinks like you deserves a little waterboarding.

[billheartyface]

sorry if you don't like justice...why not try China?...they hate human rights over there...you'd fit right in.

[historywillabsolve]

if the reich-wing is so convinced these people in Gitmo are "terrorists" responsible for dastardly crimes why don't they want them tried in a court of law? are they afraid they have no proof?

[dixiechyc]

This ruling is the most idiot decision lately by the Supreme Court. I AM SO PISSED! I've been paying taxes in this country for 40 years! And now OUR tax dollars are now going to fund these Muslim radicals to be able to have attornies & use our judicial system. This is ludicrous! Why didn't they ask me first?! I would've said, "NO! If you're going to steal my money, at least give it to the VICTIMS families of the 3,000 INNOCENT people killed at the WT Ctrs. Or to the thousands of maimed soldiers.

[diverdan00]

Try to take heart in Justice Scalia's comments. Unfortunately it will take another massive hit to awaken the people who think those dissenting are overreacting to the threat. You know...those beautiful and wise doves who think that the current tactics were devised by those who do not understand the myriad alternatives to deal with what they consider a manufactured and previously preventable problem :p

[attovishnu]

The mothers of the world bless this decision.

[dixiechyc]

Well, maybe some mothers, but THIS mother does NOT! Give my tax dollars to the wounded soldiers who fought to help Iraq!

[attovishnu]

You might give your tax dollars to that purpose but it is highly unlikely they get that money, the arms dealers most likely benefit from your generosity. Ask yourself, what is a Representative Republic. Your answer is side tracked by the legislature that cares not what you need, they get what they WANT.

[R2RO20]

well this is a huge turning point for America, we are now officially screwed.

[Joelomite]

A huge nail has been hammered into America's coffin, thanks to the pussies in Supreme Court. I am literally in shock....I can't believe that these detainees are being given full rights. Now I fear this country is doomed for sure :-(

[jeremy22227]

I believe that there are more important things than human life. As strange as that may sound coming from an atheist.

[Geo408]

Thank God for this ruling. Bring on Obama and bring back habus corpus. War terror, war on drugs is a war on us.

[diverdan00]

At the ethos of those who cheer this decision is a deep ignorance of both the nature of the threat (and of the history of such threats) and of the utility the methods used to combat such threats. Indeed they are also ignorant of the relative stature of American human rights practices and how they came to be.

[jeremy22227]

I understand what you're saying, but I think you're wrong. Let me clarify, I'm not one of those "we can't give up any of our freedoms" people but habeas corpus is too important to simply be brushed aside.

Will more people die because of this decision? It seems likely. But that's a trade that I am willing to make. They can tap my phones and they can make me take forever at the airport but they can't lock me up without letting me know why. That's a problem.

[diverdan00]

yes i agree it cannot be disregarded unless there are grave consequences. I guess ultimately what we disagree on is the gravity of those consequences. We may also disagree on the idea the transparency should be encouraged in the executive systems over overseas intervention that are otherwise a potentially a very opaque system of 'justice'. This ruling may be detrimental to not only victims of terror but terror suspects themselves.

[diverdan00]

I mean to say that any president is going to maintain the intelligence community's right to snatch and grab terror suspects and hold them as assets. This practice is unfettered and unbroken in history and the moral outflow of our legal system is precisely what sets apart modern democracy's tactics from the mechanics of the systems that some critics have compared (gulags) the detention methods of late with.

[diverdan00]

Finally i would say that the integrity of that system we seek to defend is threatened here. A police state is only a few 9/11's away. The line between a state of equilibrium re habeas corpus and a state without regard for it is influenced by the integrity of that state.

[diverdan00]

All this has done is make life harder for intelligence assets. Instead of being transparent the executives who protect your right to rant on about human rights must now use offshore methods to preserve the ability to obtain life saving information. A little study in the global relativity of human rights could clear this in the minds of all but the most myopic, denial practicing ignoramus.

[qazwas2001]

eat that bush, where's your rubber stamp supreme court now?

[hanzender]

What a naive oblivious dipshit.

[qazwas2001]

lol, well I'd love to hear you defend your position professor...

[oroweight]

gaza,you defend your position and tell us your sorce of information,or can you?

[qazwas2001]

"According to Amnesty International, in an analysis of 500 detainees, a remarkably low number, only 5 percent, or about 25 detainees, were captured by US forces. Eighty-six percent, or about 430 detainees, were arrested by Pakistani forces or the Afghan Northern Alliance and turned over to US custody - often for a reward of thousands of dollars. " continued next post.

[qazwas2001]

"The other 9 percent are not discussed in the Amnesty report. Many were sold to the United States to even scores or just for the money. Anyone living in Afghanistan - young or old - was fair game for sale to US forces. The oldest detainee shipped to Guantanamo was 75 and the youngest 10." -- Colonel Ann Wright, US Army, US State department, Retired.

Like I said in previous posts, everyone should know this by now.

[qazwas2001]

Wow, it is strangely quiet now lol. I suppose you are having trouble finding justification for locking up 10 years olds without showing cause.

[LandOfTheBrave01]

I know the argument will be that Nancy Pelosi passed a minimum wage increase. LOL!

Well, at minimum wage, how many gallons of gas can you put in your car to drive to work for 1 week? Lets see. $7.25 won't even buy me 2 gallons of gas.

She is so worthless. Women, don't ask to ever be President or Speaker of the House or Majority Leader. Unless you force Nancy Pelosi to Impeach! I want to see 5 million women on Nancy Pelosi's door step promoting impeachment, or women in politics is dead.

[HabsRule92Remy92]

So because Nancy Pelosi, and Hillary Clinton and inept, all women must stay out of politics?

[LandOfTheBrave01]

For the record, I think he will be successful at bullying congress. Nancy Pelosi is a push over. She will introduce any legislation that undermines the vast majority of American Citizens, but will not introduce Articles of Impeachment.

I find it very difficult based on her track record to justify any woman ever obtaining a position of power which directly effects millions of honest hard working Americans. Its just too risky. I'm sorry ladies but Nancy Pelosi is your best example?

[LandOfTheBrave01]

Will somebody please place handcuffs on George W. Bush? Please! You don't have to make them tight. Just place them secure, so he can't weasel out of them. For GOD's sake, is there anybody man enough to place handcuffs on George Bush?

He thinks he will be able to bully Congress into passing new legislation so that he can continue to hold innocent people and torture them, like he plays golf. Please, for the love of this Country, please very gently slip a pair of hand cuffs on him.

[2Pac4ev3r701]

with all due respect Google WTC7

[crazycatfguy]

AP your video quality is so freaking bad if it were not for the fence we could not tell the detainees from the supreme court justices. It is not freaking rocket science. Youtube help can clue you in on how to upload video that does not look like crap.

[Vikezupa]

Remember, some that were going to be tried on these tribunals are picked up on the battlefield. If they now have access to our federal courts and have the same protections as American citizens under the Constitution, what does this say to an American soldier who captures one of these terrorists on the battlefield and may still be being fired at in terms of collecting evidence, rights of the person that he's captured and all of these types of things?

[qazwas2001]

educate yourself. 90% of the detainees at gitmo were cab drivers and farmers kidnapped by norther alliance forces and turned over for a bounty. The reason bush doesn't want them to have access to the evidence against them is because there is no evidence against them.

Allowing that system to go unchecked makes the US no better than Stalinist Russian or Nazi Germany.

[ellwyn]

what makes you think that cab drivers and farmers can't also be terrorists? that's like saying someone can't commit a crime if they have a day job. you are either ignorant, or you support the aims of the terrorists. for your sake, i would choose the former.

[qazwas2001]

ellwyn, I'm sure I've had arguments with you before.

It is a known fact that they rounded up anyone and sold them for the bounty. Watch "road to guantanamo"

That entire system was inept, and the Bush admin wants to let innocent people rot to hide the truth.

What makes me better than you is that I would never support the Nazis, no matter what Fox news told me.

[hanzender]

Life Lesson #1: Quit learning from Michael Moore movies! You will be better off and more informed.

[qazwas2001]

If you think Road to Guantanamo is a Michael Moore film, it is you who is ill informed.

[hanzender]

No, dork. I'm talking about Moore-style documentaries. I'm also talking about idiots who are taught by the tube like yourself. Think for yourself not what someone wants you to think. You are a sheep.

[qazwas2001]

Translation: It is easier to believe whatever you want if you ignore all sources of information.

[hanzender]

Sorry about the wait, I don't live on youtube. Your translation certainly applies. Let's just knock your "documentary" down quickly. Why was it that not all of the actors in the doc were willing to take a lie detector test? It was offered. Someone who watched a movie and declares themselves educated is becoming the norm but still idiotic. Habeas corpus was written for citizens and has always been suspended in time of war. You reaction was predictable though.

[qazwas2001]

the film is just one of a thousand sources of information. Read my post farther down where I supply a quote from an interview with a retired US army colonel. Although she is just a Colonel, and you are a guitar player, so you probably know best.

[hanzender]

And the colonels who state the opposite don't matter because the don't speak your reality that has been created for you. I can show you a video about leprechauns being real with eyewitnesses and pics. You would still be learning from a documentary with a purpose. Unfortuantely there is no such thing as informative braodcasting or documentaries about modern day events. It's all people's opinions and clever editing without clean sources. But you are right, it was a stab at Bush but w/o thinking.

[qazwas2001]

So the media is only biased if they report information that runs counter to the interests of the conservative movement. A documentary is propaganda if its message is one you don't like to hear. If we don't like the facts we decide there are no verifiable facts only opinions.

Colonel Wright was summarizing a report by Amnesty International

If my beliefs about US conduct are in fact correct, that conduct is nothing new. It is in fact congruent with US foreign policy over the last 50 years.

[qazwas2001]

If your beliefs are accurate, it represents a change for the better in US attiudes towards human rights. Even the law of probability is not on your side.

[hanzender]

If my beliefs are correct, you have no idea about different cultures. You know nothing about the people you defend. Your mind sees only black and white. You do fall in the crybaby category. You took this as a shot at Bush without consideration of much else which still makes you happy.

[hanzender]

NO. The media is biased when they repeatedly show one side more than the other. Besides, don't you know by now, news facts are extinct. It's all opinions. Nazis didn't get these rights that these pampered terrorists get who don't even appreciate them. You will come to change your mind on this decision...or just blame Bush when they come back. Do you know how many released prisoners were caught again on the battlefeild?

[qazwas2001]

Yes Univerisity education in political science and anthropology teaches you nothing about other cultures. I think it is obvious that if anyone is ignorant it is you. Once again you call them terrorists.

Tell me this. How can a 10 year old be considered a terrorist worthy of idefinite incarceration? Yes I know how many released prisoners were recaught on the battlefield. Twelve. Scalia was citing false information when he declared that there were more in his discenting opinion.

[qazwas2001]

"Antonin Scalia wrote in his dissent in Boumediene v. Bush: "At least 30 of those prisoners hitherto released from Guantánamo have returned to the battlefield." It turns out that statement is false."

[qazwas2001]

"According to a new report by Seton Hall Law Center for Policy and Research, "The statistic was endorsed by a Senate Minority Report issued June 26, 2007, which cites a media outlet, CNN. CNN, in turn, named the DoD as its source. The '30' number, however, was corrected in a DoD press release issued in July 2007, and a DoD document submitted to the House Foreign Relations Committee on May 20, 2008 abandons the claim entirely."

[qazwas2001]

"The largest possible number of detainees who could have "returned to the fight" is 12. The only one who has undisputedly taken up arms against the United States or its allies, "ISN 220," was released by political officers of the DoD against the recommendations of military officers."

--Marjorie Cohn, President of the National Lawyers Guild

I never said that there weren't bad guys at gitmo. I said they should have a right to a fair hearing.

[TECHKLEC]

I think it's both!

[Vikezupa]

oh my gosh. Crazy friggin' Supreme court jesters. Products of drugged out hippy professors during the 60's. Never trust a hippy.

[MBbackwards]

We're fucked, voters dont elect anymore, you think that dumbass got elect 2 TIMES? or elected at all! the first president who got egged on the way to the white house? McCain is a fucking robot, just listen to him talk god dammit. 9-11 was an inside job, im not arguing on here im sick of that just wake up ppl, Guantanamo Bay could just join the lots of Concentration Camps in the U.S. such as the one in Beach Grove, Indiana. Just wake up and do somthing about on you own, dont follow a politician.

[DonSimonBolivar]

People should vote for Barack Obama since Barack is the same as McCain. Wants the embargo on Cuba, supports AIPAC and continues to support the status Q. F@ck YOU OBAMA! GIVE REAL CHANGE! FREE PUERTO RICO!

[geargemartin]

all puerto rico has to do is vote for independence when it perennially pops up

[TECHKLEC]

It appears that conservative justices become more liberal as they age.

[geargemartin]

justice kennedy is a Reagan appointee and though a republican he is considered a moderate. he is often the swing vote.

[authentic1000]

Hilarious!

[TECHKLEC]

Yeah,right...giving AlQuida members the rights of an American citizen just plain ol' cracks me up.

[authentic1000]

What I meant was: your comment in which you say "conservative justices become more liberal as they age" is hilarious. I agree with you Alquida.

[qazwas2001]

techklec you are an idiot. Anyone with a brain stem should know by now that 90% of detainees at gitmo where given to coalition forces for a bounty. Basically northern alliance militants picked up farmers and cab drivers and handed them over for money. Then your government put them in orange coveralls and called them terrorists so idiots like you would think something is getting done. The reason bush doesn't want them to have access to the evidence against them is because there isn't any.

[TECHKLEC]

qazwas2001 thinks that since everyone in jail who says they "didn't do it" should just be released automatically.Meanwhile,Americ­an servicemen are getting killed by Farmers and cabdrivers.

[qazwas2001]

FACTS: 90% of gitmo detainees were never on a battle field. They were warm bodies NA warlords could collect a bounty on by kidnapping them and then saying they were Al Quaeda.

To not know this, you must have avoided picking up a newspaper since 2001.

Secondly, the latest National Intelligence Estimate clearly stated that Americans are LESS SAFE because of EVERY decision Bush has made since 2001.

Real life doesn't resemble the show 24.

[TECHKLEC]

"FACTS" from where? Do you absolutly know this to be fact??? I get a newspaper delivered daily, have several online subscriptions and have kept abreast of current events since the earlt fifties. While I don't have all the answers, YOU sure as hell don't. Stop dreaming and wake up to what's happening.

[qazwas2001]

lol, do a google search. I love how this is news to you. It is your ignorance, you want to believe that the US is the world's hero, and you ignore/refuse to process any information that doesn't fit with your current belief system. If you are old enough to have been keeping abreast of current events since the early fifties, it is probably time you grew up.

[TECHKLEC]

Since I neither said nor implied that anybody is "the world's hero", so do yourself a favor and stop trying to make up your false accusations. I was grown before your mother got lost in the jungle and sat in a puddle of cum where all the monkeys jerk off.

[qazwas2001]

as a guy who served in Viet Nam you should know better. You really think anything has changed? Like I said before, google it.

as for your "mother got lost in the jungle" remark. Not sure if this is some kind of attempt at a racial slur, but I can trace my lineage back hundreds of years to Ireland.

[redfarts]

This is clearly the ranting of a cum-drunk bitch.

[oroweight]

gaza, You were fed that liberal,anti-American propaganda and you took it.Now you use infantile

name calling instead of maturely looking at facts,on your own,and making an independent decision.

[qazwas2001]

blah blah blah, take at look at the facts yourself and show me where I am mistaken. I form opinions based on facts, you avoid facts that threaten your childish belief system.

[billheartyface]

I've never heard an infant use "name calling"...could you please elaborate.

[iamnoturbuddyguy]

So now Habeus Corpus is back ?