@casadejoey No. Linking verbs never occur in passive constructions. I have a video on linking verbs (I use the older term "copulative verb"). When forms of "to be" appear in passive constructions, they do so as auxiliary verbs (or helping verbs). In "We were happy," "were" is a linking verb, and active. In "We were invited," "were" is an auxiliary verb, and "were invited" is in the passive voice.
There's no equivalent passive verb of verbs in the active voice in the future progressive tense, and 'will be seeing' is in the future progressive tense. So, there's no such verb phrase as 'will be being seen', is there?
@KenKoh9801 All tenses can be employed in both the active and passive voice. The following, for example, is a perfectly natural English sentence: By morning, my letter to the editor will be being read at breakfast tables around the country.
That's a very funny one. Question: In the sentence "I wanna be kissed by you, just you, nobody else but you, boop boop de boop", 'be kissed by you' sounds like the passive voice, but it's not, right? Because 'want' is the verb, and the rest of it must be an infinitive phrase acting as a noun, according to your #13 video. So is 'kissed by you' an adjective withing that noun phrase? Or what?
Jesus! Right! These lessons mau be interesting but they are so boring!!! I can't imagine myself preparing a lesson like this for my students. They would place me in the middle of the twon square and burn me up!!! The point is teaching not showing how much you know!
Ktalanet. This lesson is designed for advanced and grown up students. For kids and children it's definitely boring but for us it's too interesting. Please Mr' mrthoth keep up the great work
Cont. That is, you never say: "I haven't clean," but: "I haven't cleaned." However, your explanation made things much clearer (although I still think English could do without past participle tense...). Since "have" is the present tense, rather than the past one like "did (not)" is of "do (not)," the verb still needs to be conjugated into its past participle tense, because its auxiliary isn't, and without something in the past tense, the sentence wouldn't be in the past. Thank you so much! ^_^
Also, one thing that I find weird about English: In the past simple tense, when you want to make the verb negative, you don't have to keep it in the past tense anymore. That is: "I didn't see," rather than: "I didn't saw." You mentioned that you only need to make one word go into the past tense, and that will make the whole sentence go into the past, so now I can finally understand the past participle rules, which I had previously thought to be irregular.
Anyway, my pointless rambling aside, I really love your videos. I like to think of myself as a grammar expert, but your videos have taught me some things that I didn't know before (they don't teach English grammar properly in schools these days, so I get most of my information from linguistic books and Wikipedia XD). For example, I always used to think of "may," "might," etc. as auxiliary verbs as well, but now I know that they're modals. That really helps a lot. Thanks. ^_^
My God... There is no such thing as coincidence, is there? I checked out most of your videos yesterday at about three o'clock in the morning, and promised myself that I would watch the rest when I woke up the next day (well, earlier that morning). Now it's the next day (earlier morning), and you've uploaded a new video! Even though you hadn't updated in a whole year, you've uploaded a new video! On the very day that I found you out! That's amazing! XD
Great and instructional video as always.... You'll be being seen by me in the next will.
regan4000 1 week ago in playlist English Grammar Lessons
You need a better camera
AppleADDICT1997 2 weeks ago
Is it always a passive voice if it's a linking verb?
casadejoey 1 month ago in playlist More videos from mrthoth
@casadejoey No. Linking verbs never occur in passive constructions. I have a video on linking verbs (I use the older term "copulative verb"). When forms of "to be" appear in passive constructions, they do so as auxiliary verbs (or helping verbs). In "We were happy," "were" is a linking verb, and active. In "We were invited," "were" is an auxiliary verb, and "were invited" is in the passive voice.
mrthoth 1 month ago
@mrthoth I've so much to learn "/
casadejoey 1 month ago
well done :)
simanbrar 2 months ago
Your vids always rock
An esl teacher here :)
expatted 4 months ago
George Clooney :D
anasmansoor16 10 months ago
End was funny :D
I learned a lot though,
I wish I had teachers like you in my school :(
well You really helped me,
thanks :)
PoisonedShaggy101 1 year ago
There's no equivalent passive verb of verbs in the active voice in the future progressive tense, and 'will be seeing' is in the future progressive tense. So, there's no such verb phrase as 'will be being seen', is there?
KenKoh9801 1 year ago
@KenKoh9801 All tenses can be employed in both the active and passive voice. The following, for example, is a perfectly natural English sentence: By morning, my letter to the editor will be being read at breakfast tables around the country.
mrthoth 1 year ago
It's helped me thanks !
yemensam 1 year ago
Great explanation, mrthoth. Just one suggestion, please use a readable marker next time you make an explanation video. Thanks.
dor3k 1 year ago
WTF, why make language so complicated. Insane!!
bicnarok 1 year ago
It is a nice explonation ,excellent !
pspezone 1 year ago
ok where is my decoder ring?
wiseguy989 1 year ago
That's a very funny one. Question: In the sentence "I wanna be kissed by you, just you, nobody else but you, boop boop de boop", 'be kissed by you' sounds like the passive voice, but it's not, right? Because 'want' is the verb, and the rest of it must be an infinitive phrase acting as a noun, according to your #13 video. So is 'kissed by you' an adjective withing that noun phrase? Or what?
juensong 1 year ago
You will be being seen by many learners!
hard1steel 2 years ago
very good refresher video!!
xwizdom 2 years ago
thank you for posting these videos. you are great.
ACHO1org 2 years ago
Thanks. :)
TheLarssan 2 years ago
Perhaps, Ktalent, you could post a vid or two?
HENJAM48 2 years ago
Thank YOu =)
YoungNarnia 2 years ago
Thank u so much ... am using this information to work on my project which is due 2 day later lol
YoungNarnia 2 years ago
this video suckssss
kjfpro1 2 years ago
i'm taking a 300 level class at my university and your short but informative lectures are helping me. thanks a bunch! =]
toolongclankytoolong 2 years ago
I agree with Ktalanet i mean no offense but no wonder that your budgets are cut
tdog661 2 years ago
Is that the way to change all futture progressives? You just and a "being" and change the main verb to the past progressive form?
ericalexander19 2 years ago
Jesus! Right! These lessons mau be interesting but they are so boring!!! I can't imagine myself preparing a lesson like this for my students. They would place me in the middle of the twon square and burn me up!!! The point is teaching not showing how much you know!
Ktalanet 2 years ago
Ktalanet. This lesson is designed for advanced and grown up students. For kids and children it's definitely boring but for us it's too interesting. Please Mr' mrthoth keep up the great work
MansoorY 2 years ago 10
" The board is slapped by me" . Is it passive voice?
ashfaq2001 2 years ago
Yes!
mrthoth 2 years ago
@ashfaq2001 Leave the board alone!
Is this an imperative or exclamatory sentence? Can it be both at once?
casadejoey 1 month ago in playlist More videos from mrthoth
Also if the ink is invisible, hahahahah! lol!This lesson is excellent as always!!
salvatograsso86 2 years ago
Cont. That is, you never say: "I haven't clean," but: "I haven't cleaned." However, your explanation made things much clearer (although I still think English could do without past participle tense...). Since "have" is the present tense, rather than the past one like "did (not)" is of "do (not)," the verb still needs to be conjugated into its past participle tense, because its auxiliary isn't, and without something in the past tense, the sentence wouldn't be in the past. Thank you so much! ^_^
nicoleb 3 years ago
Also, one thing that I find weird about English: In the past simple tense, when you want to make the verb negative, you don't have to keep it in the past tense anymore. That is: "I didn't see," rather than: "I didn't saw." You mentioned that you only need to make one word go into the past tense, and that will make the whole sentence go into the past, so now I can finally understand the past participle rules, which I had previously thought to be irregular.
nicoleb 3 years ago
Anyway, my pointless rambling aside, I really love your videos. I like to think of myself as a grammar expert, but your videos have taught me some things that I didn't know before (they don't teach English grammar properly in schools these days, so I get most of my information from linguistic books and Wikipedia XD). For example, I always used to think of "may," "might," etc. as auxiliary verbs as well, but now I know that they're modals. That really helps a lot. Thanks. ^_^
nicoleb 3 years ago
My God... There is no such thing as coincidence, is there? I checked out most of your videos yesterday at about three o'clock in the morning, and promised myself that I would watch the rest when I woke up the next day (well, earlier that morning). Now it's the next day (earlier morning), and you've uploaded a new video! Even though you hadn't updated in a whole year, you've uploaded a new video! On the very day that I found you out! That's amazing! XD
nicoleb 3 years ago
Awesome lesson as usual sir. Thanks a heap
MansoorY 3 years ago