He claimed it was a hot day so he removed his flip flops: last thing you'd do is expose your feet to hot tarmac. BS idiot boy imposter. I grew up singing the pre 1967 Beatles songs and suddenly they changed and the innocence lost. Got into soul motown. Reconnected with Beatles in late teens. Sickened to realise the meaning of Strawberry Fields.On a R4 broadcast today, realised how very very busy they had to be once Paul was dead; recording xmas fan records, albums etc. Covering tracks quicktime
i grew up with the Beatles... and watched all they did during the 60s closely.And i remember thinking with the Sgt.Pep album"he just doesnt look the same.. something's not right".An ever since i have almost every type of documentary on them.And I recently understand now WHY there are unusual moments where
any of the other 3 seem"unusual" and even uncomfortable with "Paul".This can REALLY be seen in ungaurded moments in the Let It Be movie.Look for yourself.. and look CLOSELY for those moments
its prudent to realize the fact that ever since the INTERNET the wealth of information available is staggering.. compared to the times BEFORE the info hi-way.because on there one can finally research and find the actual REAL reasons for the decpetion which was perpetrated by the British government at
that time for VERY specific political and financial reasons and finally eliminates the "Beatles made a hoax for laughs" EXCUSE... understood ?It ALL makes perfect sense NOW because of the REASONS
He NEVER imagined a thing called "the internet" would come along.Its impossible not to continue to try to keep this under wraps.I used to think that ONLY when he pases on that the TRUTH will be made known. And know what ? Maybe NOT even then because IF the legalities of a will are such, possibly everything the "imposter" accumulated in "Paul's name" he just might forfeit and his inheritors might get NOTHING.Hard to say how legal things work cause THIS is the most UNIQUE situation EVER to exist
All you do is use irrelevant bullshit and creepy graphics to scare people into believing this outrageous rumor, such as in some of your videos you use references from albums before 1966 such as help and rubber soul, and claim that there are "clues" on them that make somehow lead to "paul being dead?" seriously you need to give this up... BTW you are a phony -iamaphoney
One should be stupid to believe such rumors. All these "clues" doesn't mean anything. It could be a joke or coincidence. The idea of Abbey Road cover representing a funeral procession is plainly absurd! As for the back cover dots could make a five, a star, anything, and the elbow of the woman looks nothing like Paul's face!
Im starting to come to the conclusion that charles manson was part of the disinformation about any symbolism being found on beatles albums... they promoted him as someone who found symbols in the music and listened to music backwards.... the only connection ANY beatle had with manson was through paul....
Although lennon said later that none of the "clues" were intentional and pretty much up to the listeners imagination... it only strengthens the myth.... i mean everything about them was intentional... in certain songs like revolution 9 there is a car wreck played in reverse on the recording so when its played backwards it ends up at the beginning of the song and plays forward... after the crash there is a burning sound then a bass starts playing.. it was meant to be reversed...INTENTIONALLY
im guessing you have never seen the other shots of abbey road? in some others hes wearing sandals and barefoot in others too, also if you didnt connect those circles like a dumbass, you would have gotten the number 5 which doesnt mean anything, this shit makes me laugh
@lumbago12 supposedly, he'd be in his 28th year of existence according to indian culture, because they count fetal development. that's how they justify it. i'm not saying there right or wrong.
wasn't this the hippie generation?! so it was normal for paul to take off his shoes! and the whole cigarette thing (or a "coffin nail") is bull. everyone smoked back then.
the elbow thing?? wtf?? r ppl that desperate??
the three also looks like an "E" (well that's how i saw it at least) this whole rumor is based on perspective and persuasion.
I agree. And Paul always having a hand over his head like a preachers hand blessing a body, wth?! People are to desperate and it's plain stupidity that anyone would believe this.
Yes but in the indian religion when your in the woum its counted for the first year of your life and the beatles studied indian religion and hinduism so appearently he would have been 28 and not 27
Apparently, how the conspiracy goes is that some eastern religions record your age from the time of conception, and that the beatles were into that kinda thing.....sooooo if you look at it like that, it would have made Paul's age 28
yes but if it were 5....and not 3 as suggested by the video, then you can still look at it in the sense that they are counting the original 4 plus the fake paul, wich adds up to 5 and thus either way it still works...suck my coconuts! :)
This IS very convincing. According to David Oats of Reverse Speech fame, people can say anything forwards but wind up speaking the truth in reverse. I can understand the 3 remaining Beatles would have been trapped in the lies in order to keep the money machine going. The truth of their frustration and humiliation, in reverse, would have been something that wasn't planned.The other clues?if it was done on purpose they must have had the CIA working with them! I mean come on!My mind is being blown!
happy to see there are people in this world who dont buy the first gibberish someone tells you about the probabbly greates songwriter LIVING... is dead.. paulie is LIVIE jaja
exactly...wich still does not throw this theory off...you see they are counting the original 4...plus "fake paul" ....so yeah, Clue still works, the video maker is just mis-informed! :D
@beatlefan246 i've heard that one b4. even tho u prove a point, some idiots put that as even MORE proof. because if you count the 4 beatles plus william campble, u get 5. i personally dont believe it but just saying.
If Paul died in Nov. '66, he was 24 when he died...not 28 if he had lived longer........ Born in June, 1942.....supposively died in November, 1966.....get the facts staight....
The words on the wall are split to read "Be at les abbey".Les is the French definite article(though plural).Furthermore, if we use numerologic on the next two letters and add the two together,(R and O are the 18th and 15th alphabet letters)you get 33, multiply this by the number of letters (2) and we get 66. Paul died in 66; yet,33 can also be read as CC (the third letter twice).Cece is short for Cecilia,that Paul could possibly be buried at St. Cecilia's Abbey in Rhyde on the Isle of Wight."
I think it's funny how some people get in denial about this. I mean, it's ok to believe Paul is alive and that this was all a "joke", but there's no way you can deny that the evidences and clues exists.
Some say that the LMW stands for "Linda McCartney Weeps". She would if she found out that Paul in fact did die. Look it up on wikipedia: Paul was indeed married to Linda on Sept. 26, 1969 when this album was released. They married on March 12, 1969. Hmmmmm....
Thank you! I've been watching this series and it's amazing how many people lose their beliefs in this bull shit. If anything it's iamaphoney (how apt) who's brainwashing people by playing things backwards too much!
The Beatles recorded things backwards; imaphoney is just showing you. Go to wikipedia and type in "backmasking", and you will see that the beatles were the actual masterminds that started this in the music industry. They recorded backwards with a special recording machine in the studio. John and Yoko's "Revolution 9" is THE perfect example.
Just noticed this one: There are seperations in the word "Beatles" to say "Be" "at" "les". Leso is the place in France where Paul is supposed to be buried according to legend.
people are not buried barefoot in England??? I don't know of a single place in the world where this is fact. That would defeat the puprose of supplying clothing for your deceased loved ones
Have you ever seen in an open caset funeral a FULL open casket? Probably not... You usually see from the waist up. I'd heard it's true that yes, people are buried barefoot. Not sure why...
uuhhh...Paul would've been 27 not 28. More importantly, I believe that Britney Spears is actually Baby Spice. Think about it! The Spice Girls dissapeared arond the same time Britny showed up on the scene....and even more astounding Britney Spears= Baby Spice.....BS=BS! The clues are all there! Just ask Charlie Manson!
apparently you can see Paul's butchered body if you put the Please Please Me cover nexto to the ocean and say the phrase stupid get, stupid get, Paul's dead and bin bagged by his bird
Whether Paul is dead or not, there are some things that Capitol/EMI/Apple really need to do some explaining of. I've been a huge follower of iamaphoney's series since it started, but even this billboard thing shocked me.
He claimed it was a hot day so he removed his flip flops: last thing you'd do is expose your feet to hot tarmac. BS idiot boy imposter. I grew up singing the pre 1967 Beatles songs and suddenly they changed and the innocence lost. Got into soul motown. Reconnected with Beatles in late teens. Sickened to realise the meaning of Strawberry Fields.On a R4 broadcast today, realised how very very busy they had to be once Paul was dead; recording xmas fan records, albums etc. Covering tracks quicktime
DaftAida 2 months ago
Well, the face on the elbow is pretty creepy. This whole thing is creepy.
lasuco45 3 months ago in playlist the rotten apple series
As someone who spent a lot of time in London I'd suggest that LMW may mean London Motorway.
dav8d777 3 months ago
Paul would have been 28 in Indian years, but Stu would've been 28 in standard years.
SilenceDoGood25 4 months ago
i grew up with the Beatles... and watched all they did during the 60s closely.And i remember thinking with the Sgt.Pep album"he just doesnt look the same.. something's not right".An ever since i have almost every type of documentary on them.And I recently understand now WHY there are unusual moments where
any of the other 3 seem"unusual" and even uncomfortable with "Paul".This can REALLY be seen in ungaurded moments in the Let It Be movie.Look for yourself.. and look CLOSELY for those moments
strangecluesinfriday 4 months ago
its prudent to realize the fact that ever since the INTERNET the wealth of information available is staggering.. compared to the times BEFORE the info hi-way.because on there one can finally research and find the actual REAL reasons for the decpetion which was perpetrated by the British government at
that time for VERY specific political and financial reasons and finally eliminates the "Beatles made a hoax for laughs" EXCUSE... understood ?It ALL makes perfect sense NOW because of the REASONS
strangecluesinfriday 4 months ago
He NEVER imagined a thing called "the internet" would come along.Its impossible not to continue to try to keep this under wraps.I used to think that ONLY when he pases on that the TRUTH will be made known. And know what ? Maybe NOT even then because IF the legalities of a will are such, possibly everything the "imposter" accumulated in "Paul's name" he just might forfeit and his inheritors might get NOTHING.Hard to say how legal things work cause THIS is the most UNIQUE situation EVER to exist
strangecluesinfriday 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@iamaphoney
All you do is use irrelevant bullshit and creepy graphics to scare people into believing this outrageous rumor, such as in some of your videos you use references from albums before 1966 such as help and rubber soul, and claim that there are "clues" on them that make somehow lead to "paul being dead?" seriously you need to give this up... BTW you are a phony -iamaphoney
cravedave01 7 months ago
Is TPF the one narrating these early videos?
NightSurfer47 9 months ago
*why
MisterLambs 10 months ago
If you don't think these rumors are real, we are you watching these.
MisterLambs 10 months ago
@MisterLambs for a good laugh, i need one from time to time
catman63879 7 months ago
One should be stupid to believe such rumors. All these "clues" doesn't mean anything. It could be a joke or coincidence. The idea of Abbey Road cover representing a funeral procession is plainly absurd! As for the back cover dots could make a five, a star, anything, and the elbow of the woman looks nothing like Paul's face!
bluesrock2008 11 months ago
Im starting to come to the conclusion that charles manson was part of the disinformation about any symbolism being found on beatles albums... they promoted him as someone who found symbols in the music and listened to music backwards.... the only connection ANY beatle had with manson was through paul....
gilligan80 11 months ago
Although lennon said later that none of the "clues" were intentional and pretty much up to the listeners imagination... it only strengthens the myth.... i mean everything about them was intentional... in certain songs like revolution 9 there is a car wreck played in reverse on the recording so when its played backwards it ends up at the beginning of the song and plays forward... after the crash there is a burning sound then a bass starts playing.. it was meant to be reversed...INTENTIONALLY
gilligan80 11 months ago
some say that revolver and a rubber soul album have clues. both these albums were released before nov 66. please add to this.
gregriv69 1 year ago
on a hot day on i would take my shoes of just not to go walk over freak hot tarmac
MrAddi80 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheFabFour14 1 year ago
Comment removed
TheFabFour14 1 year ago
OK that roar at the end scared me a bit. This was a fascinating clip compared to the last 4.
LiteracyLabyrinth 1 year ago
i did not like the lion!
SakitSaPuwit 1 year ago 6
im guessing you have never seen the other shots of abbey road? in some others hes wearing sandals and barefoot in others too, also if you didnt connect those circles like a dumbass, you would have gotten the number 5 which doesnt mean anything, this shit makes me laugh
skatethem55 1 year ago
DX i hate how convincing this is. I want paul to be alive :(
byemynameishi 1 year ago
28 IF? Yeah, 28 if it was 1970 and not 1969!
lumbago12 1 year ago
@lumbago12 supposedly, he'd be in his 28th year of existence according to indian culture, because they count fetal development. that's how they justify it. i'm not saying there right or wrong.
OddlyRandomPro 1 year ago
@OddlyRandomPro Sometimes I look at old school photo's and doubt my own existence! :)
lumbago12 1 year ago
@lumbago12 so do i, i dont even remember the last ten years of my life, i feel like all of the sudden i poped out of nowhere.
Abe91195 1 year ago
barefoot burial in England...er, no!
lumbago12 1 year ago
1:43
you can make the letter E TOO!!!!!!!!!!!
20Bravesfan 2 years ago
Paul would have been 27 in 1969 dumbass....
darthtater7777 2 years ago
-- Paul's suit is dark blue; Ringo's is darker blue or black...and I don't think Paul's eyes are closed either.
panhandleman2 2 years ago
Hmm two stories of Paul taking off his shoes.
First it was, "It was hot..."
Then, "I don't like shoes..."
Hmmm...
AbigailDouglas 2 years ago
Faul has changed his story for why he was barefoot
faulconandsnowjob 2 years ago 4
Pedrito Infante is DEAD!!!!
calvero75 2 years ago
Con esos puntos puedes hacer, CUALQUIER NÚMERO, no nada más el tres... es una tonteria pensar que Paul está muerto.
Solo es publicidad.
Escarlinhos 2 years ago
Ah hell, those dots make a better 5. They could also make a 6. OR they could just be friggin' dots!
Flasoo8 2 years ago 2
no he would've been 27
wemily101 2 years ago
Indeed!
Grafietstift 2 years ago
the dots look more like an E than a 3
lspradling11 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
stupid
BLDBLT 2 years ago
agreed, stupid.
people need to find something constructive to do
junkyardmonkie 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if this is stupid say i
BLDBLT 2 years ago
wasn't this the hippie generation?! so it was normal for paul to take off his shoes! and the whole cigarette thing (or a "coffin nail") is bull. everyone smoked back then.
the elbow thing?? wtf?? r ppl that desperate??
the three also looks like an "E" (well that's how i saw it at least) this whole rumor is based on perspective and persuasion.
REDLUVER089 2 years ago 2
I agree. And Paul always having a hand over his head like a preachers hand blessing a body, wth?! People are to desperate and it's plain stupidity that anyone would believe this.
jellycracker101 2 years ago
The elbow things....oh my god, how badly do you wanna dig something up if you see Paul's head in that? :P This is just stupid.
omgzomgnomgvomg 3 years ago
ringo would be a scary under taker
Maddy922 3 years ago 2
agreed
Ninjakitten88 3 years ago
we don't have sidewalks :( we have pavements
bicarb69 3 years ago
Sylvie Vartan is the girl in the blue dress on the Abbey Road back cover.
Blue Jay.
to761983 3 years ago 2
LMW.
Late McCartney Was 28 if he lived.
That's better than "Linda McCartney weeps".
to761983 3 years ago
He would have been 27, u suck
Janne112 3 years ago
Yes but in the indian religion when your in the woum its counted for the first year of your life and the beatles studied indian religion and hinduism so appearently he would have been 28 and not 27
starkyringo909 3 years ago
ohhh.
UltimateVenom 3 years ago
This video ends with a roaring lion.
Also heard in Good Morning, near The End.
to761983 3 years ago
There's a shadow near the three dots that seems to form a seven, it means 37 people were up for a secret audition to be paul.
ACloutierProductions 3 years ago
yaaaa...on nice days i take off my shoes and walk across hot concrete....suuure
:o)
cosgirl22 3 years ago 2
He's holding a ciggerate...
Coffeecreamerwarrior 3 years ago
Comment removed
REDLUVER089 2 years ago
It can also be a 5. implicating that there have been 5 beatles.
You can see another number 5 under the words ABBEY ROAD when you pause at 3:20. its a shadow shaped like the number 5.
Magma541 3 years ago
paul was 27 in 1969, not 28
partytimex42 3 years ago
Apparently, how the conspiracy goes is that some eastern religions record your age from the time of conception, and that the beatles were into that kinda thing.....sooooo if you look at it like that, it would have made Paul's age 28
zeph456 3 years ago
Oh I see. But that's so silly! the people who believe this stuff just stretch their imaginations don't they? haha
partytimex42 3 years ago
very true, but you have to remember: Paul was born in 1942, and Abbey Road was made in 1969,
so Paul would've been 27 at the time of Abbey Road's release.
Ericboom 3 years ago
i always laugh at the face on the arm part
GulperEEL 3 years ago
If only
He would have been 27
js5163 3 years ago 2
BTW i could easily draw a 5 on that 3.
MikePortnoyz 4 years ago
it looks more like an E rather than a 3
fxnegron 4 years ago
5 Beatles, yeah.
to761983 3 years ago
5, a number that means nothing about beatles, just like all the other proofs. Yeah.
MikePortnoyz 3 years ago
I love clues yeah yeah yeah
I love clues yeah yeah yeah
to761983 3 years ago
Clues love you yeeeee yeee yeee
Clues love you yeeeee yeee yeee
Clues love you yeeeee yeee yeee yeeeeee XD
MikePortnoyz 3 years ago
yes but if it were 5....and not 3 as suggested by the video, then you can still look at it in the sense that they are counting the original 4 plus the fake paul, wich adds up to 5 and thus either way it still works...suck my coconuts! :)
mattfatherofgrace 3 years ago
That's just....stupid. hahaha
partytimex42 3 years ago
the face on the arm is ridiculous
pacifist316 4 years ago
VERY interesting videos you got there!
HelterSkelter085 4 years ago
This IS very convincing. According to David Oats of Reverse Speech fame, people can say anything forwards but wind up speaking the truth in reverse. I can understand the 3 remaining Beatles would have been trapped in the lies in order to keep the money machine going. The truth of their frustration and humiliation, in reverse, would have been something that wasn't planned.The other clues?if it was done on purpose they must have had the CIA working with them! I mean come on!My mind is being blown!
coolkingchris 4 years ago 8
please dont fall for this shit... do your OWN research and dont trust eveything people tell you
kmw4 4 years ago 2
happy to see there are people in this world who dont buy the first gibberish someone tells you about the probabbly greates songwriter LIVING... is dead.. paulie is LIVIE jaja
fxnegron 4 years ago
But it wuold be kinda interesting if it was true haha. But i saw too much photos to believe it... he's alive.
MikePortnoyz 4 years ago
'It was a nice day... I don't like wearing shoes...'
Right.
jondavis1234 4 years ago
those dots on the cover make a 5 if you connect them right.
beatlefan246 4 years ago 12
yeah real paul fake paul and the surviving 3 beatles
mrbals2 4 years ago
nice find
BrownssuckdotTK 4 years ago
exactly...wich still does not throw this theory off...you see they are counting the original 4...plus "fake paul" ....so yeah, Clue still works, the video maker is just mis-informed! :D
GOOO CONSPIRACY!
mattfatherofgrace 3 years ago
Lol... in any way you can build it...
MikePortnoyz 3 years ago
@beatlefan246 The 3 beatles 2 pauls
whitestdudeyouknow 1 year ago
@beatlefan246 i've heard that one b4. even tho u prove a point, some idiots put that as even MORE proof. because if you count the 4 beatles plus william campble, u get 5. i personally dont believe it but just saying.
holycrappers8899 1 year ago
@beatlefan246 i guess you could argue the original 4 beatles plus the fake paul=5
thephattyarbuckle 11 months ago
@beatlefan246 the 5 beatles, meaning a 5th one.
Abe91195 7 months ago
These people are nuts...they've really lost it
thebeatles1965 4 years ago
I would love to have that billboard hanging on me wall.
GuruRaga 4 years ago
If Paul died in Nov. '66, he was 24 when he died...not 28 if he had lived longer........ Born in June, 1942.....supposively died in November, 1966.....get the facts staight....
FillmoreBlue 4 years ago
but abbey road was in 69 so he would have been 28 the next year
fillthpunk 4 years ago
get your facts right you dumbass abbey road was in 69 so he would have been 28 next year
mrbals2 4 years ago
What about the sideways skull in between the beatles and the girls arm? they show a big picture of it when they talk about it.
ForThoseAbot2Rck 4 years ago
Yeah
CrialCrial 4 years ago
paul is dressed in blue not black.
beatlemania800 4 years ago
Note that "Beatles" is also split into "Be at les" then an "o" that is seperate on the Sgt Pepper cover. Could the "o" stand for an island perhaps?
Tdani81 4 years ago
Source:
homepages. tesco. net /harbfamily /opd /albumabbey. html.
Tdani81 4 years ago
The words on the wall are split to read "Be at les abbey".Les is the French definite article(though plural).Furthermore, if we use numerologic on the next two letters and add the two together,(R and O are the 18th and 15th alphabet letters)you get 33, multiply this by the number of letters (2) and we get 66. Paul died in 66; yet,33 can also be read as CC (the third letter twice).Cece is short for Cecilia,that Paul could possibly be buried at St. Cecilia's Abbey in Rhyde on the Isle of Wight."
Tdani81 4 years ago
This is an important clue. Thanks for bringing it to light!
shirteesdotnet 4 years ago
I think it's funny how some people get in denial about this. I mean, it's ok to believe Paul is alive and that this was all a "joke", but there's no way you can deny that the evidences and clues exists.
winchester86 4 years ago 3
i wonder whos got his head lol
iLikeCookies6607 4 years ago 2
To all you people that believe he is dead, anwser these.
1. What happened to the car.
2. How did the Beatles so quickly find an imposter that looks, sounds, as talented and as good song writer as paul.
3. How did 'Faul' get pauls bank account and house etc.
4. Why would pauls family let an imposter into there lives?
5. Why didnt jane leave 'Faul' 'straight away' after the 'supposed death'?
6. So linda was tricked into thinking he was the real paul?
Beatle1989 4 years ago
I agree with this Guy
crazycrazycrazyadam 4 years ago
Some say that the LMW stands for "Linda McCartney Weeps". She would if she found out that Paul in fact did die. Look it up on wikipedia: Paul was indeed married to Linda on Sept. 26, 1969 when this album was released. They married on March 12, 1969. Hmmmmm....
Tdani81 4 years ago
Those dots ...hmmm if you connect them you can form an "E" too...hmmm "E" Beatles....
Blackmantra2000 4 years ago
my friend wears exactly the same clothes like john lennon on abbey road and he's not a spiritual being...jeeesh...
Blackmantra2000 4 years ago
i heard (don't know if its true or not) that they planned this so that they could fall out of the publics main interest and become a studio band.
GarrettBrown18 4 years ago
bull shit. Why must everything have such a grand theory attached to it?
bengluke 4 years ago
Thank you! I've been watching this series and it's amazing how many people lose their beliefs in this bull shit. If anything it's iamaphoney (how apt) who's brainwashing people by playing things backwards too much!
Phantomstruelove 4 years ago
The Beatles recorded things backwards; imaphoney is just showing you. Go to wikipedia and type in "backmasking", and you will see that the beatles were the actual masterminds that started this in the music industry. They recorded backwards with a special recording machine in the studio. John and Yoko's "Revolution 9" is THE perfect example.
Tdani81 4 years ago
It's unhealthy to rely on Wikipedia.
Phantomstruelove 4 years ago
GOOGLE "Linda McCartney" then. You'll get the same things.
Tdani81 4 years ago
Just noticed this one: There are seperations in the word "Beatles" to say "Be" "at" "les". Leso is the place in France where Paul is supposed to be buried according to legend.
Tdani81 4 years ago
oh crap! not dots!
stinkomanrocker 4 years ago
best line: you will see three circles, or "dots"!
TheBeatlesAreBack1 4 years ago
If your band mate had died in a car crash, would you REALLY sing about?. Would the record company actually let you do this?
mralw1969 4 years ago
rawr
gatmanandrobin 4 years ago
people are not buried barefoot in England??? I don't know of a single place in the world where this is fact. That would defeat the puprose of supplying clothing for your deceased loved ones
andrewjamesguy 4 years ago
Have you ever seen in an open caset funeral a FULL open casket? Probably not... You usually see from the waist up. I'd heard it's true that yes, people are buried barefoot. Not sure why...
BeatleBabe 4 years ago
Well, it's not like they're going to be doing a lot of walking.
logantaylor777 3 years ago
Well, I'm from Greece and I buried my Grand Dads, my Father-unfortunately-and my Paternal Grand Mother with their shoes on.
DAGPGPH 4 years ago
What's with the roar?
robman11706 4 years ago
look at his cigarrete at a distance it looks like one finger sticking up it might mean one beatle gone
guitarlicksinc 4 years ago
uuhhh...Paul would've been 27 not 28. More importantly, I believe that Britney Spears is actually Baby Spice. Think about it! The Spice Girls dissapeared arond the same time Britny showed up on the scene....and even more astounding Britney Spears= Baby Spice.....BS=BS! The clues are all there! Just ask Charlie Manson!
ghostysshow 4 years ago
what if celebs ever go on youtube and search for stuff on themselves.i wonder what paul mccartney would say if he saw this vid.
shyface52 4 years ago
He'd probably say, "It's a drag, isn't it...?"
billwesleman 4 years ago
apparently you can see Paul's butchered body if you put the Please Please Me cover nexto to the ocean and say the phrase stupid get, stupid get, Paul's dead and bin bagged by his bird
obexley7 4 years ago
woa they cut off his head?:o
shyface52 4 years ago
That's kinda pulling at loose strings. Paul isn't dead. If he was, why is he all over the news?
hippiekyd416 4 years ago
Many many thanks to Dr Lev for letting me use his speak in some spaces
iamaphoney 4 years ago
Some of this audio is from Doctor Lev's PID CD...which I have along with his book "Billy Shears: The Secret History of the Beatles"
doctorlev9 4 years ago
Well, the lion roar at the end definitely scared the crap out of me.
Dolfinz1991 5 years ago
ditto x_x
hypermetalsonic 4 years ago
This is excellent, I"m fucking hooked!!
Darkit2099 5 years ago
Whether Paul is dead or not, there are some things that Capitol/EMI/Apple really need to do some explaining of. I've been a huge follower of iamaphoney's series since it started, but even this billboard thing shocked me.
RockXLight 5 years ago
dame unas mamadas pinche gringo ocioso!
vctr87 5 years ago
Another nice Paul Is Dead video! Great Job!
Frozensquirrel 5 years ago