Creation Science - Challenging the Theory of Evolution

[wiscokiddd]

GOD did and does it all for the ZioNazis because god is an acronym for:

Guns, Oil & Drugs, Thou shall not kill except for god.

[357MagnumBob]

Whoops... not THE original kind, AN original kind. There are many. Ex: Dog kind. Original kind split into foxes, wolves, jackals, coyotes and others. There are red and silver foxes, gray and red wolves. Once domesticated, many breeds ensued. But ALL ARE DOGS. Unsurprisingly, the fossil record yields no precursor to the dog "kind." Same is true for cats, sauropods, clams etc. YES sometimes genetic drift causes sterility barriers among daughter species of the same kind (horse- zebra- donkey).

[357MagnumBob]

What a massive straw man deception - and I think she knows it. What she describes is not special creation. It is "everything came into existence yesterday and all our memories are an illusion." Nobody denies natural selection, the debate is over the starting point. Genesis teaches creation according to kinds. This means change over time can occur but when the original kind is found, there will be no precursor. Just like everything we find in the fossil record from armadillos to trilobites.

[357MagnumBob]

You don't say? The whole motivation for Huxley to become "Darwin's bulldog" was that he recognized that the account of how sin and death came to the human race was a lynchpin of Christian belief... and if that were undermined, the whole idea of a Savior coming to Earth to provide forgiveness for sin becomes a non sequitur.

Then there is the whole problem with Darwinian theory and there complete inability to demonstrate abiogenesis - not only that it is plausible, but that it actually happened.

[megaead69]

Christians can believe evolution.. Watch "Did Darwin Kill God?"

[daniloorbolato]

@megaead69 The distinction between the two is in its least as east and west. They will never be on the same place.

You cannot believe in God and at the same time Evolution. Because one is the denial of the other.

Or haven't you read genesis and the papers on evolution? How can you say you can accept both?

[megaead69]

@daniloorbolato Christians can accept evolution. 

[daniloorbolato]

@megaead69 They will no longer be Christians but yes anyone can. Evolution denies the essence of Christianity which is the redemption and also the creation of God.

For how long 'science' says all life forms have been evolving? And in genesis how long does God says He made everything (ACCORDING TO ITS KIND?) evolution says there is no purpose no hope no wrong, right evil or good, and what does the bible has to say about all those things?

You are undeniably mistaken.They are extremely opposite

[symmetry08]

The Father of Intellegent Science were Flint Stone Cartoon admirers. When Intellegent Design Idea had been introduce they rejoiced and shouted Yabi-Dabi-Doo

[orangemod]

Conservative Christians "believe" that if a child becomes an Atheist, he/she will become immoral, steal, cheat, lie....I think that sums up their ignorance/self-loathing/arroga­nce very well.

[orangemod]

"Creation scientist !?!?!?" "At least teach creation science to "balance it out !?!?"

PFFFT, why not teach "magical pixies & unicorns as well "to balance it out"...LOL...ha, ha, funny people. "creation science"...blind fighter pilot, tasty fruitcakes, pretty girls with mustaches, giant midgets, perpetual motion, honest politicians......

[atheistram]

@Lichtspielhaus234 It is not a personal biased claim. It is fact.

[atheistram]

@Lichtspielhaus234 Actually, all creationist's are close minded. If science discovers something that proves special creation, it will be accepted. On the other hand, if evidence is presented to a Creationist that disproves what they believe, they'll just say, "LALALALALALALALALALALA... the Bible says you're wrong.

[orangemod]

@atheistram Ath, you make a very good point. Anything that comes to light as a fact must be accepted by the scientific-minded person. There is no dogma or absolutes or beliefs in science. When one has an absolute or dogma to follow and is required to follow it regardless of the surrounding facts, it makes it kinda hard to accept anything that does not follow the dogma required. Therefore, religious absolutes leave people no where to go even when their beliefs are proven wrong.

[atheistram]

@orangemod Exactly. :)

[steveinchelsea]

Creation science is an oxymoron ! Why not also teach the flat earth in astronomy classes, or alchemy in chemistry classes?

[Rozlelous1165]

I believe that both are possible because i doubt Adam and Eve looked like we do today i believe that they may have had some change from then until now. everything changes over time, its just that we humans chose a name for it as we know it as evolution.

[2Musicscout2]

@Rozlelous1165 its called adaptation not Evolution

[Rozlelous1165]

@2Musicscout2 I know, i was stating that humans use the name evolution to describe adaptation over time. i don't really agree with evolution, because when you start talking about humans came from apes i say your crazy lol. One question that people can't answer still to this day is why if we so called evolved from apes than all apes should be extincted because they should have all magically turned into humans...lol that's a lie as big as Santa Clause. don't you think

[aguteempasil]

if only christianity had never taken place, think how advanced our civilization would be.

[lizazoon]

Even bible colleges don`t teach creation::Most bible colleges teach it`s allegory:As an example, there are 106 schools in the Christian College Coalition. Of those 106 only 5 teach a literal interpretation of the Genesis account of creation or that the flood was global & the flood prevailed the highest peak

[jsnkrn]

It's funny that people of faith think non-believers have no morals, because from my personal experience the inverse is true. It just comes across as an attempt at deception, but maybe that's just how religion works.

[ironpicket]

This is a sad example of dishonesty. Creationist do not believe that all creatures are static and do not change. In fact, many believe that through the process of natural selection (micro evolution) all the creatures on this earth have descended from the "kinds created by God." For example two perfect Canines were created with all the diversity in their genetic make up to produce all of the dog kinds we see today. Even if you disagree with a idea you should represent it honestly.

[LaingGod]

regardless of what you believe you are still retarded.

[JanusChristIsRisen]

@ironpicket What's a "kind"? Is that an order? A family? A genus? A species?

[jimbob6986]

Wow what a load of bullshit.

[adebigpiano]

creation is not a science.

[cslaughlin13]

creation science is a dishonest way to promote a christian agenda in the public schools. I would also love for her to "disprove evolution", and of course, websites must tell the truth behind the lies of evolution, because of course everything posted on the internet is true. And dinosaurs were put on this earth by "god" to test peoples faith to believe in evolution, what a dumb "scientist", actually I wonder what her Phd was in, most likely, not science

[adamproskiw]

i'm sorry god, but it seems everything you were responsible for creating is either broken, dying or dead. Unfortunately, my intellect cannot tolerate or ignore this astonishing level of incompetence any longer and am forced to let you go. best of luck in the future.

[MaChOfSweden]

Eugenie Scott is a liar :/

[gregrutz]

Does the TRUTH hurt?