Yes please add Stokes Theorem!!! Professors should teach like this, with examples ready and neatly prepared. I would just play a video for the class to watch everyday and fix them over the years.
First i want to say thank you for all your videos. you are a life saver. I am taking Calc 3 now, and i am stuck to the part where we find t(0) and t(1) the limits of the integral to find the area of a loop. I was wondering if you could help me. Thanks again
I thought that was the Path Integral? What's the difference between the Path Integral and the Line Integral? I thought magnitude of c'(t) means Path Integral. Help?..
@Cruth8987 me? i do not have one.... larson seems good; i used stewart's as a student and also as when i lectured (bored people, that is). i think it is an ok book
@jakelcab Maybe your teacher really does, but ... are you talking about serious math course? It definitely takes a lof of time and technical, formal details to define line integrals properly and it takes even more effort to deriving the basic theorems and formulae for computation (which are used in this video). Give your teacher some love :)
Man I sat here for like an hour trying to figure this very problem out, and you set this problem up and I realized what I did almost immediately...I felt like such a bonehead. Thx man, you explaim things sooooo much better than my current professor.
i have a similar problem, paramatizing from (0,1) to (-1,0) clockwise on the unit circle for F(x,y)=yi+xj. When paramatizing for circles like this, will we always choose x as cos(t) and y as sin(t)?
I know you hear this alot, but I just don't understand why other professors can't be like you. You make everything seem so clear and sooooooo much easier to understand. Thank you so much for your time that you have spent making these videos. By the way, which book are you getting these problems out of? Because some of the problems are the exactly the same in my book. I was just wondering if you're using the same book as me. Mine is Essential Calculus, Early Transcendals by James Stewart.
@JBS90 glad you like the vids. do not worry though, when i taught i am sure plenty of people said i sucked. yes, i am using stewarts book (my old version 5 edition that i taught from)
If you're not an actual professor or working towards becoming one, you should really consider it. You have a gift for teaching people. Thank you very much!
This video helped me understand what a line integral actually is. That bit at the beginning about integrating the function around the curve C really helped. My maths professor didn't explain that bit. So in comparison to a regular integral, integrating about the x axis, instead of finding the area between the function and the x axis, we're finding the area between a function and some other line.
hahaha, was practising line integrals not 2 days ago and did this exact question (james stewart, calculus, 6th edition, sec 17.2 Q3.) had a little chuckle to myself. i actually had to check it when i did it because i didnt expect it to go so high.
i can't understand the Parametrization part!! please guide me through that..... lmao i've my exam after 2 days and i still dont know it..... please guys help
thanks so much; i thought i was doing it completely wrong but this showed me the minor mistake i made. calc 3 final is tomorrow; i'll have you to thank if i do well
Thanks dude. About to take Cal. 3 test 4... Then the final in a week. You're a lifesaver. I will forever remember the blessing you were to me in Cal. 2 & 3. Wish you had good differential equations videos for next semester! I haven't found them yet...
Thanks ... I was starting to hate mathematics after taking calculus 2.... But tanks to u, I can understand the physical representations of the mathematical symbolisms of these complex concepts...;)
I think thats because the profs. like to go into all teh technical stuff... Also this was showing how to do a line integral with respect to arc length ds. Still a great, clear video though.
This was a fun class calc II once i got the right prof 1st a hole used to spank over proofs I hated his ass cuz we saw nothing practical. I dropped and took next semester with an American and it was a rockn claess.
Can you solve a line integral without the parameter "t"? I've got aproblem where the Vector field (Force)is F(x,y,z) = (f(x,y,z),g(x,y,z),h(x,y,z)) and the curve is r=(x,y,z) I can't see anyway to set this problem up without the parameter, but the question never mentions it, I don't suppose you're not busy and could reply with a simple relevant yes or no.
is there a way to calculate the length of the curve of a function of x and y which is above a specific curve in the xy plane? Basically, is there a way to find the length of the green line on the top in the picture at the beginning?
could you just do something on curlF, green's thrm, and stoke's thrm. I sorta understand the concept of flow circulation and flux, but it doesn't really matter in cal 3. what does matter is how to set up the problems with parametrization and knowing which cross products to take which i'm struggling with, you saved my ass in cal 2, i know you can do it again in cal 3! :D
thank u ;)
shayan22h 4 weeks ago
MORE LINE INTERGRALS EXAMPLES
iceman10101 1 month ago
this was extremely helpful. thank you.
yaboyjruff 3 months ago
Real men use Spivak :P
phenethylaminedreams 3 months ago
why don't you change u back into sin(t)?
DjRipEntertainment 3 months ago
Comment removed
jtacquaiii 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you have IPHONE or IPAD and you want to calculate integrals check out this app:
itunes.apple.com/us/app/integrals/id471022211?mt=8
bebefore3 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IF YOU HAVE AN IPHONE OR IPAD AND YOU WANT TO CALCULATE INTEGRALS CHECK OUT THIS APP:
itunes.apple.com/us/app/integrals/id471022211?mt=8
anaxarte 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you have IPHONE or IPAD and you want to calculate integrals check out this app:
itunes.apple.com/us/app/integrals/id471022211?mt=8
bebefore3 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you have IPHONE or IPAD and you want to calculate integrals check out this app:
itunes.apple.com/us/app/integrals/id471022211?mt=8
bebefore3 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you have iphone or ipad and you want to calculate integrals check this app:
itunes.apple.com/us/app/integrals/id471022211?mt=8
bebefore3 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
if you have iphone or ipad and you want to calculate integrals check this app:
itunes.apple.com/us/app/integrals/id471022211?mt=8
bebefore3 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IF YOU HAVE AN IPHONE OR IPAD AND YOU WANT TO CALCULATE INTEGRALS CHECK OUT THIS APP:
itunes.apple.com/us/app/integrals/id471022211?mt=8
anaxarte 4 months ago
Yes please add Stokes Theorem!!! Professors should teach like this, with examples ready and neatly prepared. I would just play a video for the class to watch everyday and fix them over the years.
cptcolo 5 months ago
Could you do some videos on contour integration please?
MrEdwards01 6 months ago
@patrickjmt
Hi, Just wondering if you can help throw some light on something that's bothering me...
Ok
You know that
Int(-inf to +inf of exp(-x^2)) = sqrt(pi) But this is ODD don't you think. Pi => Circles! What's the Gaussian got to do with circles.
I know about the change of variables trick and WHY the pi occurs, but physically if you will, where's the circles in the gaussian??
Hope this makes sense, Jamie.
jamie1234591 7 months ago
I just did this problem in my homework... and now I'm watching him do it... at least I know I did it right!
Go2Balen 7 months ago
Wow, this is the exact problem I was doing for homework! Lucky me!
sharinganfuranku 8 months ago
thnx to your videos i don't faint during midterms no more
elmaslocotex 9 months ago
First i want to say thank you for all your videos. you are a life saver. I am taking Calc 3 now, and i am stuck to the part where we find t(0) and t(1) the limits of the integral to find the area of a loop. I was wondering if you could help me. Thanks again
gramshakja 9 months ago
Everything seems smooth but why didn't you plug the U= sin(t) back into the integrant at the end??
deltaklm 10 months ago
@deltaklm Nevermind, should have thought that one out before I asked. We plugged the limits of integration into U for a reason ;]
deltaklm 10 months ago
decent example ;] thnks!!
imvanessavella 10 months ago
Could you (or anybody else) tell me which marker/pen do you use
that allows you to erase stuff right off the paper?
Incognito6543 10 months ago
@Incognito6543
AHAHaHHAH freaking noob! Its not a paper.
demerda 10 months ago
can you upload a proving video? I think if you proved the line integral formula it would be easier to understand, in my opinion.
wesKokigen 10 months ago
could you have used F dot dr here?
DSnyd601 10 months ago
I am not a fan of the stewart textbook :/
varung92 11 months ago
@varung92 It's a bit simplistic, probably the most simplistic of the bunch.
maqrux 10 months ago
u r a cheetahhhh
dailydesi 11 months ago
Why can't I get a degree if I learn it all for free online?
PoCripple 11 months ago
I thought that was the Path Integral? What's the difference between the Path Integral and the Line Integral? I thought magnitude of c'(t) means Path Integral. Help?..
smallsmiles181 1 year ago
@smallsmiles181 Path integral, line integral, curve integral and contour integral are all the same things.
whoppix 11 months ago
great
Sh1Math 1 year ago
lol "pull it out" XP
ZhangyXD 1 year ago
yeah.. what IS your preferred calculus textbook? I use larson..
Cruth8987 1 year ago
@Cruth8987 me? i do not have one.... larson seems good; i used stewart's as a student and also as when i lectured (bored people, that is). i think it is an ok book
patrickJMT 1 year ago 10
@patrickJMT I used Stewart's as well.
n7275 11 months ago
Oh no, it's just the module not absolute value, haha
rawadom 1 year ago
That square root is the absolute value of the derivative of f(x(t),y(t)) with respect to t
rawadom 1 year ago
dang, my teacher sucks at explaining this compared to you.
jakelcab 1 year ago
@jakelcab Maybe your teacher really does, but ... are you talking about serious math course? It definitely takes a lof of time and technical, formal details to define line integrals properly and it takes even more effort to deriving the basic theorems and formulae for computation (which are used in this video). Give your teacher some love :)
Czeckie 1 year ago
Such a great video! I found it really helpful :D
christine9944 1 year ago
@afghanplayr20 yes, you should look over your calc 2 stuff if you do not remember; there should be some basic examples in your book somewhere
patrickJMT 1 year ago
patrickJMT CAN divide by zero
Picouchu 1 year ago 3
2:19 radius if four not sixteen
arias1772 1 year ago
Man I sat here for like an hour trying to figure this very problem out, and you set this problem up and I realized what I did almost immediately...I felt like such a bonehead. Thx man, you explaim things sooooo much better than my current professor.
seeker7truth1 1 year ago
f university profs they are so fing useless
ZhangyXD 1 year ago
i have a similar problem, paramatizing from (0,1) to (-1,0) clockwise on the unit circle for F(x,y)=yi+xj. When paramatizing for circles like this, will we always choose x as cos(t) and y as sin(t)?
thomashamiltom 1 year ago
@thomashamiltom ya remember x=rcos(theta), y=rsin(theta)? theta = t(time) now
ZhangyXD 1 year ago
@ZhangyXD I can see it being easy like so for circles like this where 4 is the radius, but what about an elipse where the radius changes?
thomashamiltom 1 year ago
I know you hear this alot, but I just don't understand why other professors can't be like you. You make everything seem so clear and sooooooo much easier to understand. Thank you so much for your time that you have spent making these videos. By the way, which book are you getting these problems out of? Because some of the problems are the exactly the same in my book. I was just wondering if you're using the same book as me. Mine is Essential Calculus, Early Transcendals by James Stewart.
JBS90 1 year ago
@JBS90 glad you like the vids. do not worry though, when i taught i am sure plenty of people said i sucked. yes, i am using stewarts book (my old version 5 edition that i taught from)
patrickJMT 1 year ago
@patrickJMT so are you anti rogawski? i heard stewart is good
arias1772 1 year ago
@patrickJMT Doesn't appear to change much...I'm using Stewart 6E at Ohio State, and this is problem 16.2 #3.
heimdall116 3 months ago
If you're not an actual professor or working towards becoming one, you should really consider it. You have a gift for teaching people. Thank you very much!
stonefree87 1 year ago
This video helped me understand what a line integral actually is. That bit at the beginning about integrating the function around the curve C really helped. My maths professor didn't explain that bit. So in comparison to a regular integral, integrating about the x axis, instead of finding the area between the function and the x axis, we're finding the area between a function and some other line.
IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW!!!
DeluxeWarPlaya 1 year ago
Nice. Thanks.
loohz 1 year ago
@canhazthought not only beautiful, but smart! i like that. : )
patrickJMT 1 year ago 5
This video was so engaging, not even the star craft II ad could distract me.
metaserve 1 year ago
ily
VWinUgo 1 year ago
hahaha, was practising line integrals not 2 days ago and did this exact question (james stewart, calculus, 6th edition, sec 17.2 Q3.) had a little chuckle to myself. i actually had to check it when i did it because i didnt expect it to go so high.
demondim5 1 year ago
My final Calculus paper's coming and your uploaded videos are really helping me out of this jail.....keep it up
baigali93 1 year ago
you say you want the radius to = 16 at 2:16 , but you want r^2=16 therefore r=4.
Thank you for the video!
ifstatements 1 year ago
Hey Patrick, will you marry me? I'll be a good husband, I swear.
Knightmetal 1 year ago
god bless you man youre the best!
Christillusion6sic6 1 year ago
Awesome video as always. In 2:17 though, when you said the radius had to be 16, did you mean 4? or...
howfishhao 1 year ago
Hey patrick what can you do when you end up with a term like 180t^2 + 128t3 under the root sign?
Dancesux 1 year ago
Cheers, Pretty Clear stuff. but erm.. i dunno how you just guessed the limits from -pi/2 -> pi/2 .
adheeshz 1 year ago
intense. thanks for the help!
zep4life 1 year ago
good video. it's actually "parametRize" and "parametRization", not "parametize" or "parametization". keep it up!
crawfish35 1 year ago
Thank you so much! I wish my professor was as clear as you are in your explanations :)
Tribute0427 1 year ago
Very well done man, thanks for doing that.
zechenife 1 year ago
simple and effective video , thanks!!
jaymofly8 1 year ago
can we use x = 4*sin(t) , y = 4*cos(t) ?
StarlightForOneYear 1 year ago
you r a life saver.
supuwamigosh 1 year ago
its not technical stuff...for the parametrization hes just using polar coordinates to integrate (x = rcost and y = rsint) !
limejello2525 2 years ago
i can't understand the Parametrization part!! please guide me through that..... lmao i've my exam after 2 days and i still dont know it..... please guys help
or i'll be hung to probation.....
superjini777 2 years ago
HI one dummy question but long story why im at this situation ......
Please Guide me ANY ONE!!!!
how to calculate r(t) for parametrization!!
its urgent! please buddies, ur help will be highly apreciated! reply with any "link" on statement.... please use beginners language for me!!
superjini777 2 years ago
Thanks very much... really helpful!!!
starsing815 2 years ago
thanks so much; i thought i was doing it completely wrong but this showed me the minor mistake i made. calc 3 final is tomorrow; i'll have you to thank if i do well
FalconPictomancer 2 years ago
thank you
matiomatio 2 years ago
Thanks dude. About to take Cal. 3 test 4... Then the final in a week. You're a lifesaver. I will forever remember the blessing you were to me in Cal. 2 & 3. Wish you had good differential equations videos for next semester! I haven't found them yet...
jamescboyd 2 years ago 2
Thank you!!
jenn9580 2 years ago 9
Thanks ... I was starting to hate mathematics after taking calculus 2.... But tanks to u, I can understand the physical representations of the mathematical symbolisms of these complex concepts...;)
TuscanWonder995 2 years ago
thanx burbur... jus solved a problem i was stuck on for 30 mins..... yee
h8r4rlzyee 2 years ago
Your videos are the best. Id never make it through math with out this help.
mustangdale2001 2 years ago
Your videos are way better than my prof's lectures. It's gotten so bad that she has just stopped lecturing and is using MIT videos as a stand-in.
Thanks for all of your hard work and keep it up!
geoengstudent2013 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hahahah what a horrible teacher
The6ChickMagnet 2 years ago
Thanks for making this video, you make this otherwise complicated math lesson very short and easy.
Btw, your use of erasing and rewriting different parts of the evaluation is very effective.
Thanks again
sfcsarah 2 years ago
it took my professor two classes to explain this and you just did it in less than 10 min. thank you!
lilmayn2390 2 years ago 18
I think thats because the profs. like to go into all teh technical stuff... Also this was showing how to do a line integral with respect to arc length ds. Still a great, clear video though.
liquidstl 2 years ago
Patrick, thank you for posting. I found it very useful.
Vonpink15 2 years ago
This was a fun class calc II once i got the right prof 1st a hole used to spank over proofs I hated his ass cuz we saw nothing practical. I dropped and took next semester with an American and it was a rockn claess.
searcherT 2 years ago
Comment removed
thestonedgeologist 2 years ago
You explain things so clearly. Why is it so hard for professors to do the same?
Freestyler717 2 years ago
perhaps they can just play my videos in all calc classes : )
patrickJMT 2 years ago 4
My last calc teacher did lol.
inspiration4him1 2 years ago 7
really?? hahaahh!! very often?
patrickJMT 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is path integral. not line integral -
vop3766 2 years ago
you rock... come teach in brisbane for a while lol you'll make my life easier... nah good work man keep it up!! Thanks!
loki153624 2 years ago
i am VERY greatful.
you basically just summed up my 1 hour class in 10 minutes
you should consider being a professor yourself
yashar22 2 years ago
dude u fuckin own i had that question on my assignment and had no idea how to do it
hellrell102 2 years ago
ha that problem's in my calculus book. wish ya had done #5 instead of #3. i got this one right :)
still very helpful keep it up.
JamesNorton1234 2 years ago
Can you solve a line integral without the parameter "t"? I've got aproblem where the Vector field (Force)is F(x,y,z) = (f(x,y,z),g(x,y,z),h(x,y,z)) and the curve is r=(x,y,z) I can't see anyway to set this problem up without the parameter, but the question never mentions it, I don't suppose you're not busy and could reply with a simple relevant yes or no.
TheMaskedDonut 2 years ago
well thanks!
samuelthestrong 2 years ago
is there a way to calculate the length of the curve of a function of x and y which is above a specific curve in the xy plane? Basically, is there a way to find the length of the green line on the top in the picture at the beginning?
calvinhobbesliker2 2 years ago
Hello, Patrick!
I appreciate ur work and really love your way of teaching, your way of representing everything!
I really love ur work and love you even more :) Don't get me wrong!
Thank you for ur effort! God bless you!!!!!!!
Lyubyashaya 2 years ago
thanks for the nice words : )
i am glad that i can help you!
patrickJMT 2 years ago
Im confused why the limits of integration changed?
HiImWilfrdBrmly 3 years ago
Because he is integrating in terms of u not t so you have to change the limits.
Zalzal019 3 years ago 3
nice job
headdytube 3 years ago
Thanks, very descriptive! esp the geometric interpretation at the beginning
swraman 3 years ago
thanks, helped so much. keep it up :)
musical17 3 years ago
great video pat, REALLY NEED A STOKES THRM. VID, please please pretty please :D
mypainturass 3 years ago
i need to read that physics book i bought first... : )
patrickJMT 3 years ago
could you just do something on curlF, green's thrm, and stoke's thrm. I sorta understand the concept of flow circulation and flux, but it doesn't really matter in cal 3. what does matter is how to set up the problems with parametrization and knowing which cross products to take which i'm struggling with, you saved my ass in cal 2, i know you can do it again in cal 3! :D
mypainturass 3 years ago
pretty good example. nice vid.
deepbluetarget 3 years ago
patrick:
What about this example
Integral(-4dy + 3dx) where c is a union (0,0) to (-4,3) and (-4,-3) to (-8,0)
fmadero 3 years ago
These are awesome! You have a very clear, concise way of explaining things. Thanks for taking the time to make these.
zeedee775 3 years ago
no problem. glad that they help
patrickJMT 3 years ago
thanks a lot although i was able to solve the sum before you finished explaining it cleared watever doubts i had left..
tarang1990 3 years ago
happy to help! you are too fast compared to me!
patrickJMT 3 years ago
well thanks but i am getting by somehow my uni's SEM 1 math course... studying line surface multiple integrals right now.. thanks anyways!
tarang1990 3 years ago
Thank you alot Patrick!
Waranle 3 years ago
no problem! : )
patrickJMT 3 years ago