@EdoFrenkel is right; Zehetmair is informed by the history of the Chaconne/Ciaconna before Bach. It was originally a Spanish & Italian dance brought over from "the New World" in a fast 3-time with an accented 2nd beat & specific bass ostinato - cf. the Ciacconas of Kapsberger, Falconiero, Cazzati, & Rossi. Bach was conscious of this tradition (calling the work Ciaccona, not Chaconne), but chose to change the traditional bass motif and broaden the tempo, as many of his German contemporaries had.
@monelleny It's actually quite in line with what a person who is trained in period performance would do - whom I would suspect Zehetmair aligns himself with. It is undoubtedly shockingly different from say Pearlman, Milstein, Heifitz, etc, but the playing has a visceral quality to it that seems to be lacking in many other recordings of this piece.
My biggest regret in life is that David Oistrakh never recorded this partita. My favorite recordings are by Grumiaux (without the reverb, thank you) and Suk. I do prefer a more solid, stable interpretation. This one makes me very nervous. However, you seem to know much more about all this than I do. I appreciate you sharing your opinion!
Nice. One of the very few that play chords starting bar 9 from the bass, consequently sounding like chords, letting the mind to fill the small gaps to follow the tenor voice, as it would sound on a harpsichord. Great arpeggiations and general bowing, too. I feel good Baroque flavour here.
Nicely played it totally misses what is unique about this movement as compared to the other movements in this partita . This movement provides a sense
of architecture , a certain regularity being an essential part of the organic growth. here one gets a collection of disjointed gestures
each one captivating but as a whole never really adding up to anything.This inability for long range thinking might be the reason why mr Z is an abysmal conductor
Very interesting, I like some things and don't like some other things. I like the general shape of the phrases but he may be a little too liberal with the tempo and a little heavy handed with the pedal tones.
i like this but don't love it. one thing i dislike about period interpretations by modern violinists is the tendency to cut notes short. i think the longer stroke by the tourte bow allows for more plangent tonalities in baroque music and adds great overtones that are lost when the bow strokes are reduced to martele and fouette strokes. i wish the modern players would take that into account.
I studied baroque violin in conservatory, and have a great love of the period performance tradition. What period performance has showed us is that there are MANY ways to play, and has opened doors, not shut them. Among musicians, Zehetmair is like a saint. A fiddler's fiddler. His musicianship is unparalleled - among period performers or 'mainstream' violinists alike.
I was attempting to post this as a response to a comment by Zoloff1, which is 5 down here. Also, my last sentence should read "Which is the way Zehetmair is playing it..." not "Why is the way Zehetmair is playing it..." Other than that, no mistakes :-)
what i like about this is that he doesnt play it like anyone else. when most people (and i mean most people) play this you can expect exactly when they will take time, exactly what style they will play it in, etc. I'm not saying this is my favorite interpretation (far from it really), but I have to say it really held my interest. Props to Thomas for being original..
This song was written after the death of his first wife, and it doesn't make sense why he would want someone to rush the piece. If anything it should be slow and almost giving a feel of promise.
If he is rushing the Chaconne, please tell me at what speed a Chaconne should be played? At what speed did you take it? What part did it feel like he was rushing? Did he loose control? Did it feel like rushing compared to all those other recordings you had in mind?
It is poor musicianship to be so close-minded.
Zehetmair successfully shows grief, despair and struggle while showing grace, light and hope. He has beautiful opening chords. Great unique interpretation.
I don't understand your point. Why, written after the death of his wife, should "it should be slow and almost giving a feel of promise"? Why not tortured and very angry? Why is the way Zehetmair is playing it...
By the way, this piece was written before the death of his first wife. During 1720 Bach was already making copies of his works for unaccompanied violin, meaning that they had already been completed. Maria Barbara's funeral was not held until July 7th, 1720...
complete crap you guys, Bach never meant it to be played this way, yes he has excellent technique but his rythm is crappy. I know he meant it that way but that is not what the peice was designed for. Bach is supposed to be lamenting in peace to God, not angry at God. It is a period of doubt for him and he was not angry. This guy is just sawing the piece to pieces...
Well this is just extraordinary. Excellent technique and at the same time talent and imagination to boot; this performance was carried out with guts and also with taste, two things which seem to not go together but Zehetmair does here nearly perfectly.
Zehetmair is not my favorite violinist, but he do an excellent job in here...and dare to recommend Patrick Bismuth's (on baroque violin) version of this work, i found it as the most convincing ever
Gee!! its so easy to say that this is poor and unlistenable and that he hacked through the entire thing. Its a pity to see that late 19th century and 20th as well romantic mentality still running in so many people's way of think...nobody thinks in the conduction of voices, or the imagination to re-invent every single variation, nobody thinks at least in how people could think at the moment that the piece was written.
@EdoFrenkel is right; Zehetmair is informed by the history of the Chaconne/Ciaconna before Bach. It was originally a Spanish & Italian dance brought over from "the New World" in a fast 3-time with an accented 2nd beat & specific bass ostinato - cf. the Ciacconas of Kapsberger, Falconiero, Cazzati, & Rossi. Bach was conscious of this tradition (calling the work Ciaccona, not Chaconne), but chose to change the traditional bass motif and broaden the tempo, as many of his German contemporaries had.
padrobertson 9 months ago
This will surely appeal to some. It is not without beauty or feeling. But it is so eccentric that I don't understand it at all.
monelleny 10 months ago
@monelleny It's actually quite in line with what a person who is trained in period performance would do - whom I would suspect Zehetmair aligns himself with. It is undoubtedly shockingly different from say Pearlman, Milstein, Heifitz, etc, but the playing has a visceral quality to it that seems to be lacking in many other recordings of this piece.
EdoFrenkel 10 months ago
@EdoFrenkel
My biggest regret in life is that David Oistrakh never recorded this partita. My favorite recordings are by Grumiaux (without the reverb, thank you) and Suk. I do prefer a more solid, stable interpretation. This one makes me very nervous. However, you seem to know much more about all this than I do. I appreciate you sharing your opinion!
monelleny 10 months ago
It's not even in tune! Totally disgusting this recording.
Virtok 1 year ago
The funniest Ciaconne ever. 10 points for this clown
Virtok 1 year ago
he play very good but i dont like very much the "fraseggio"
TheViolin86 1 year ago
Comment removed
melmothtube 1 year ago
Nice. One of the very few that play chords starting bar 9 from the bass, consequently sounding like chords, letting the mind to fill the small gaps to follow the tenor voice, as it would sound on a harpsichord. Great arpeggiations and general bowing, too. I feel good Baroque flavour here.
melmothtube 1 year ago
@melmothtube слабо
marina7905 1 year ago
listened to this last night as well but just cant get to grips w it
the despcription by sonnabend is v apt "ambivalent"
themusicdr 1 year ago
it sounds very staccato
TempoFurioso 1 year ago
mmm too much capricious for my taste... I would prefer something a little bit rational, like Bach s music itself.
But no doubts Zehetmair is an extraordinary violinist. Maybe his sin is to put himself in the close up instead of the composer: musical narcissism
Susagui 1 year ago
Gidon Kremer and Thomas Zehetmair . . . these two are my most favourite players!
Then there comes Leonidas Kavakos (I heard him life twice!!!)
Uto Ughi , Vengerov , Perlman , Heifez . . .
StreetPerforming 1 year ago
I don't know if such performance is filologically accurate or not, but it sounds convincing
Barbapippo 2 years ago
Comment removed
LookItsJelly 2 years ago
Comment removed
LookItsJelly 2 years ago
Quite impressive lack of musical logic .
Nicely played it totally misses what is unique about this movement as compared to the other movements in this partita . This movement provides a sense
of architecture , a certain regularity being an essential part of the organic growth. here one gets a collection of disjointed gestures
each one captivating but as a whole never really adding up to anything.This inability for long range thinking might be the reason why mr Z is an abysmal conductor
dereczynski 2 years ago
Very interesting, I like some things and don't like some other things. I like the general shape of the phrases but he may be a little too liberal with the tempo and a little heavy handed with the pedal tones.
akaye10 2 years ago
On the other hand the approach to the arpeggiated section starting around 4:00 is very cool
akaye10 2 years ago
Refreshingly light. Nobody died here, it's more like the green fields on a warm summer day.
sormu16 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I prefer a more contemporary interpretation, but for baroque, I recommend Mullova.
cromulentinnoc3nce 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Catastrophe!!Couldn t be more bad than this!Poor Bach he would cry if listen to this.Worst interpertation of this superb piece ever.
milstein91 3 years ago
i like this but don't love it. one thing i dislike about period interpretations by modern violinists is the tendency to cut notes short. i think the longer stroke by the tourte bow allows for more plangent tonalities in baroque music and adds great overtones that are lost when the bow strokes are reduced to martele and fouette strokes. i wish the modern players would take that into account.
dxxn 3 years ago
I studied baroque violin in conservatory, and have a great love of the period performance tradition. What period performance has showed us is that there are MANY ways to play, and has opened doors, not shut them. Among musicians, Zehetmair is like a saint. A fiddler's fiddler. His musicianship is unparalleled - among period performers or 'mainstream' violinists alike.
fiddlepimp 3 years ago 6
This is good but i think he mixes too much romantism and baroque perfomance ,i think also that vibrato was not used too much in german school.
tuxedomoon 3 years ago
Brilliant interpretation - this man is no trained monkey - he is a genius. Bravo!!!
mexindian1 3 years ago 16
All of you are looking for an ideal Bach sound. Really what you're looking for is for this guy to conform to basically all the other interpretations.
Zhou9 3 years ago 6
wow...i love Zehetmair's bach, regardless of what they say...yay!
happpiday 3 years ago 7
A wondeful interpretation.
Glinthos 3 years ago 11
I was attempting to post this as a response to a comment by Zoloff1, which is 5 down here. Also, my last sentence should read "Which is the way Zehetmair is playing it..." not "Why is the way Zehetmair is playing it..." Other than that, no mistakes :-)
JaredIsrael 3 years ago
what i like about this is that he doesnt play it like anyone else. when most people (and i mean most people) play this you can expect exactly when they will take time, exactly what style they will play it in, etc. I'm not saying this is my favorite interpretation (far from it really), but I have to say it really held my interest. Props to Thomas for being original..
xmrbigglesworthx 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What the hell is this? This is utter garbage. This guy needs to go back and re-read the score and re-discover the essence of Bach.
sir1920 3 years ago
Sorry i just forgot that you guys (Zoloft1 and theman21) meet Bach in person...i have no more words against that...
jdzzdj 3 years ago
agree with theman....
This song was written after the death of his first wife, and it doesn't make sense why he would want someone to rush the piece. If anything it should be slow and almost giving a feel of promise.
Zoloft1 3 years ago
If he is rushing the Chaconne, please tell me at what speed a Chaconne should be played? At what speed did you take it? What part did it feel like he was rushing? Did he loose control? Did it feel like rushing compared to all those other recordings you had in mind?
It is poor musicianship to be so close-minded.
Zehetmair successfully shows grief, despair and struggle while showing grace, light and hope. He has beautiful opening chords. Great unique interpretation.
tysond7 3 years ago 4
I don't understand your point. Why, written after the death of his wife, should "it should be slow and almost giving a feel of promise"? Why not tortured and very angry? Why is the way Zehetmair is playing it...
JaredIsrael 3 years ago
By the way, this piece was written before the death of his first wife. During 1720 Bach was already making copies of his works for unaccompanied violin, meaning that they had already been completed. Maria Barbara's funeral was not held until July 7th, 1720...
tysond7 3 years ago 2
complete crap you guys, Bach never meant it to be played this way, yes he has excellent technique but his rythm is crappy. I know he meant it that way but that is not what the peice was designed for. Bach is supposed to be lamenting in peace to God, not angry at God. It is a period of doubt for him and he was not angry. This guy is just sawing the piece to pieces...
theman21 4 years ago
Well this is just extraordinary. Excellent technique and at the same time talent and imagination to boot; this performance was carried out with guts and also with taste, two things which seem to not go together but Zehetmair does here nearly perfectly.
zarkingtaters 4 years ago 5
Zehetmair is not my favorite violinist, but he do an excellent job in here...and dare to recommend Patrick Bismuth's (on baroque violin) version of this work, i found it as the most convincing ever
jdzzdj 4 years ago 2
Gee!! its so easy to say that this is poor and unlistenable and that he hacked through the entire thing. Its a pity to see that late 19th century and 20th as well romantic mentality still running in so many people's way of think...nobody thinks in the conduction of voices, or the imagination to re-invent every single variation, nobody thinks at least in how people could think at the moment that the piece was written.
jdzzdj 4 years ago 5
poor
mandrileante 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This sounds like ass.
kikkom4n 4 years ago
He hacked through the entire thing... I'm sorry but this is unlistenable for me. Thanks for letting me hear it anyways.
aimson 4 years ago
He is the best! Do you have the rest of the partita as played by him?
katalukon 4 years ago
schade.. nur sound.. aber sehr schön
violinelove 4 years ago 2