I'm sure that a Cadillac can take an m3 or rs5 on a straight road, but Americans don't understand the significance of corners.. so they don't bother making cars that can handle them.
i would not take the caddy over neither other two, and i know it is more powerfull than the others two...and for anyone saying "overpriced German cars" it's in the US u get Ripped off by dealers...damn everyone in germany has one...and y'all paying almost the same amount of money for domestic cars....incredible!
Anyone taking the CTS-V over the other two should be really mad! The CTS-V sure is a fast car and does looks fairly good, but that's it! everything else, from confort, built quality!, material used! reliability, resell value, security............. goes for the other two
caddy is shitty. my father has a cts and its interior quality is AWFUL. shitty plastics EVERYWHERE, squeaks when you push on it, and the car isnt very reliable. my advice DONT BUY IT. Do yourself a favor
@rangerover06sc For comparison sake, a 5.7L performance version of the Dodge Durango CUV( weighting more then 2.5 tonnes) gets the same figures as the M3. So don't think americans are the only ones who build gas guzzlers.
Cadillacs focus too much on the engine. It's more than that. It has to have that smooth, exhilarating, yet comfortable ride you can get in a car such as an RS5 Quattro. I wish RS's would come to the US already. Fuck ignorant America and its lame cars, I'm moving to Europe.
:D The cadillac is nonsense... In Europe, no one will buy this car, because its so ugly and heavy and its ridiculous consumption ... And in America no one will buy this car because it has a manual shift ^^
And in Asia they wont buy it because its no german car...
The audi has 120 less horse powers and still could beat the caddilac, especially in the curves and uses half the amount of gasoline...
@StefanC4D no the audi cant beat the caddy, and its not heavy and ridiculous on consumption, go research the facts before you start talkin shit everywhere you go.. maybe your mad because your overpriced german cars are failing
@W33Dblazer if you think a car in this segement should only have performance you are the one that is mad, the German know how to built a quality product, that does everything, not going fast, and falling to pieces later on.
@W33Dblazer bently has a 34% increase in sales last year... luxury cars are selling very well. I live in boise fucking idaho and they have a dealer ship here and recently an R8 was sold.
@W33Dblazer The Audi could easily show the Cadi taillights any day. I'm pretty sure that Cadi is now using European engineering, and testing it on German roads. The ONLY reason that Cadillac is starting to be decent is sport quality is completely due to German engineering.
@BiHFSA No, the Audi can't beat the Cadillac in anything. The CTS-V is better handling and faster around the ring than a C6 RS6 Avant. CTS-V kills the old M5 and new RS6 , so the RS5 doesn't have a chance here, nor does the M3 - not in any category here.
@UFCextra The Audi can and will beat a Cadillac in anything. Better in handling, your funny. Have you seen European roads? The car is made with superior handling. Faster? It might have more horsepower, but not half of those horses reach the tires. It might win in a drag race. But add corners to a track the Audi will win.
@BiHFSA Why don't you check out the BEST lap time each car was capable of doing on Germany's Nordschleife (most famous race track in the world) ? CTS-V = 7:59 , C6 V10 RS6 Avant = 8:09 , not to mention CTS-V kills them on a track and in a straight line ......Audi can not touch this Cadillac. Only with their brand new R8. Audi RS6 top speed is 155/188 (limited/unlimited), Cadillac does 175/191mph (manual/auto).
@vatan1923 Not according to consumer reports. Audis, mercedes and bmw are literally the worst car companies as far as reliability goes. But dont take my word for it. Look it up.
@vwbigchris Most likely true. It's called chilehood sickness .. as with all new tech there are issues that have to be sorted out. A lot of 'low end' mfg. tend to copy ideas when they work and all the kinks have been sorted out. I.e. next gen BMW will have laser-light ... bet they will break, so does HUD, DCT, TT, Hydraulic Power steering, carbon fiber parts etc. If you want to lead, you need to take risks, and that does reflect the issues luxury brands have (RR being the exception).
I am in no way saying that CTS-V is a bad car, its not, but people around youtube jump into conclusions a bit too fast, and will take every review for granted (especially when american reviewers compare american cars to foreign cars) without going deep and exploring every car in details. And when you go deep, you will see that M3 and RS5 are simply better cars than CTS-V, and you might also finaly figure out why some cars are branded as "premium cars" and others are not.
First of all, you're comparing wrong cars. CTS-V is a car from higher segment than M3 and RS5. Only americans are biased enough to compare apples and oranges, just to prove their point. CTS-V has 560hp, RS5 and M3 have almost 150hp less, so how can you compare that? CTS-V should be compared to M5 and RS6, not M3 and RS5...whats next...comparing it to M1? Other than power, M3 and RS5 are much better cars than CTS-v, in every possible way, and faster around tracks, despite having much less power.
BMW is the best . The F10 M5 is four seconds faster around the Nurburgring than a CTSV and the M3 is the dominant Performance cause it can beat the $80K Audi rs5 round the Top Gear Test track and has the M3 also has 12 Championship titles and 15 race wins in the Motorsport history of the M3 . What you know about that Audi fanboys
The Caddy is the real world winner for the bucks, hands down for urban driving. All that crap about how good the Germ cars do on bent mountain roads is irrevelant, if whenever you stomp on your beemer or outie's loud pedal, I smoke that azz in my V8 DaddyCaddy, what good is spending thousands more just so your ride can roll on the autobahn if it will never even see it, unless you already live near one?
american cars are absolute rubbish....... they look terrible...handle terrible and are terrible for the enviroment.....no one in EU buys them cos american cars suck...... the american in this video has a bigger engine.only reason it won in a straigh line race.......on a track it would be absolute shocking against these supurb pieces of german engineering
@telephonic the m3 runs a v8 just like the audi and CTS-v your an idiot its not the 90's anymore nobody other than porsche uses a 6cyl in a german sports car
@telephonic i admit that German car are indeed good but there's one problem, THEY ALL LOOK THE SAME BMW looks like any other BMW same can be said about Porsche ,Audi,or and any other German car; does a ford focus look anything like a ford mustang, i think not
@craker3833 ford focus was designed in the EU......... europeans were driving focus about 5 or 6 years before you were in america.........so stop taking credit for the ford focus in essence in design and looks that is european car with an american badge on it...........ps do not compare a ford to bmw audi porshe or benz....... stupid comparison
@telephonic really um the Mustang Boss 302 beat the shit out of the m3 and numerous other german cars around laguna seca speedway so your statement makes no sense the CTS-V blows all four dour cars away around the nurb and the zr1 is barely outclassed by a car that cost 2.5 times more so you were saying?
@streetpunk83 hahaha...... i bet the mustang had like a 6 litre engine.......i just gogled that car it looks fucking horrible........i wouldnt take that car if someone offered it me free......... hell i wouldnt take any american car you offered me for free........ your cars are grotesque big engined horrible sounding crap handling bohemoths.
@telephonic Actually the mustang is a 302ci 5 liter small block v8 an yet again your statement don't make any sense in this argument crap handling if there beating german cars around race tracks that would mean that the germans handling sucks and there cars are heavier and run big v8's anymore because there copying the americans why dontt you learn something about cars before you make more of an ass out of yourself
@streetpunk83 the caddy is shit and looks shit..... just like all american cars.....if someone offered me that shitty american car as a gift i would be disapointed....
@streetpunk83 Germany is copying America considering cars!? That's the most ridicolous thing I've ever heard! Take a detailed look at American and then at German cars and you'll realize the superior technology, design and quality of Aud, BMW and Merc!
@Sunthaz There copying something the Americans learned long ago if you want to be competitive you need more displacement hence the M3 going to a v8 which BMW swore they'd never do because it'd upset the the weight distribution of the car German car in size have grown equal to American cars and they have also gone from turbo'd 4 and 6cyl engines to n/a v8s and the German technology used inst any better then Americans America just makes cars most people can afford Germans don't care about the cost
I'm sorry but that caddy's looks can only appeal to an american. And the fact that they keep comparing a 4l normally aspirated engine to a 6.2 supercharged and then bragging about the V's superiority is all the proof i need to stick to my sweet european built ride.
Eh.. I guess I'm homo cuz I'd rock the Audi long before the others. M3's are common and so are V's.... something different. I just love Audi, always have.
BMW, folks, invented the sport sedan in 1962 with the 1500. They re-invented it in 1968 with the 2002tii. They innovated it in 1973 with the 2002 turbo (first turbocharged road car ever produced). They had made a bunch of good cars before that and they made a bunch of good cars after that. All that matters is the M3 has a lot of good stuff built into it. THE BEST STUFF.
@duncreg not true... the gerneral verdict is that americans have come long way, and is almoste on the same level as the german... and the M3 is still king. V's might be good but they ain't german.
@telephonic were surpassing the Germs with the 302 boss mustang the cts v and the zr1 vette i think its fair to say were better germany has 2 cars quicker than the USA the 911 gt2 rs beat the zr1 around the nurb barely and the SSC ultimate aero is still the 2nd fastest car in the world behind the Veyron super sport but it beat the first gen veyron so whats next for ssc and there 2nd gen aero it might crush the hearts of veyronss lovers.
@KiddGalaxy i like Cadillacs and Mercedes-Benz, but it seems like instead of taking that big risk in making an entirely new car, they would've stuck with the basics. It may just be here in Louisiana, but the CTS-V isn't very popular. I've seen maybe two of them since they came out. So either they're super expensive or they aren't very popular.
@TheJermaine2030@TheJermaine2030 Taste is a very subjective thing... Indeed I absolutely love the new cts-v coupe. It is a stunning change from the mod oval cars that you see every where. The Art and Science design has given Cadillac a distinctive look from the rest of the field. And this is coming from a person who love's Merc Benz… These are the type of cars the American manufactures should have been making 15 years ago before the car collapse. I've been waiting for this car since 2006.
you realize the Cadillac is much faster and more powerful, m3 is the 2nd best here , the audi is a queer's car, audi made total shit poor cars until like 5 years ago
@CARandDRlVER nice for letting us know your review is totally biased on the cadillac's advantage ,well guess what?fuck your videos and fuck the people who believe your reviews
@nielslernou How is it biased to say that the cadilac is better when you have two cars that are evenly priced. But with one offering wayyy more interior room, a considerably faster acceleration time, and slightly faster track speed, cheaper cost of maintanence, a higher quality, or at least more exciting interior, and only lacking in the prestige or heritage department. To me the car offering all of that plus another 130 extra horsepower and about 200 more tq is without question the better car.
@rehsa2194 Way more interior room? CTS-V coupe has less space inside than BMW 1 series. It has a smaller boot than BMW 1 series. Cheaper cost of maintenance? So? A bike has a cheaper cost of maintenance as well. Higher quality? Dont be silly...CTS-V is nowhere near the quality of BMW or Audi. Fit and finish and material quality is on another level in german cars. Exciting interior? Well, if buttons scattered all over the place without any logic whatsoever is exciting to you...
@derbigpr500 Maybe the sedan, but I don't want a sedan, I'd like a sports coupe. And the only sports coupes that seat 4 adult sized people comfortably that I've ever sat in, are a ctsv coupe, m6, bentley, or maybe dodge challenger. Out of those, bentley and m6 are too costly, and dodge isn't fast enough and cant handle as well. I and many people find the ctsv coupe for 60K to be one helluva buy, you dont agree and thats fine. Buy your BMW, but the caddy is every bit as good; all in preference.
@rehsa2194 Do you know the dimensions of the CTS-V Coupe? 4788 mm long, 1882 mm wide, 1420 mm high with a wheelbase of crazy long 2880 mm. Do you know the dimensions of M3? 4615 mm long, 1817 mm wide, 1418 mm high with a wheelbase of 2761 mm.. Of course than the CTS-V coupe should have more room inside, it is much longer with longer wheelbase, it should have at least 15 cm more leg room inside, which it doesnt. Also, it has a boot of only 295 liters, M3 has 440 liters! So...
@rehsa2194 My point is, even though CTS-V's are compared with M3's, they SHOULDN'T be, because they're in different categories. CTS-V is a much bigger car, it is in the same class or segment as M5 or M6. Or E class AMG, Audi RS6 or Jaguar XF. And even though 3 series is in a segment below, it beats the CTS in terms of build and feel of quality, fit and finish, materials used, luxury inside, noise inside cabin, refinement, smoothness, room, trunk size,stuff that should be better in CTS.
@rehsa2194 Also, people seem to only look at speed and measured times, and nothing else. Which is COMPLETELY wrong. It doesn't even tell half the story about the car. For example...lets compare Mitsubitshi Evo X and Cadillac CTS-V. Evo X is faster around any track, it handles much better, it brakes much better, it even probably accelerates better. But would you say its a better car than CTS-V? You see my point? There is much more to a car than speed, and that is why M3 is still ahead of CTS-V.
@derbigpr500 And the CTS-V will shit all over ANY Bmw, ALL Audi's except the R8 V10 and almost all AMG's ....and the CTS's quality and refinement is better than Audi/BMW, the Cadillac will last longer because it is built better.
@AutoLineDaily It will shit all over any BMW? What does that mean? I didnt know cars could take a shit. I'm guessing your brain is too weak to come up with a different expression, or you're simply 10 years old. Leave the car videos my friend and go comment on something that you're a little bit more familiar with. Cars obviously aren't your thing. I can't believe how ignorant and arrogant some people can be, no wonder the entire world hates americans, most are incredibly ignorant and dumb.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@derbigpr500 And i cant believe how ignorant some of you americans are. Cadillac has been making really shitty cars for the past 20 years, they havent invented a single piece of new technology or contributed to car industry in ANY SINGLE way, while BMW/Audi/Mercedes were developing new stuff, new technologys, coming up with new cutting edge technical solutions, which, Cadillac too is using today, same as 90% of other manufacturers. Thats why germans are AHEAD of others, they invent, not copy.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@derbigpr500 Without Audi, Mercedes or BMW, and a few other manufactufacturers in europe and japan, car industry today would be where it was in the 60's. They are the ones who are moving the car industry forward, they're the ones who set standards, they're the ones who come up with 90% of new technologies and technical solutions. They're the ones who build 15-20 different car models each, all of which set standards, unlike Cadillac who builds ONE single good car, and that one was copied too.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@derbigpr500 And thats why next time you wanna make yourself look like a moron and say something as dumb as "cadillac shits all over any bmw or audi", think about how stupid the thing you're aboout to say is. Know that cadillac cant shit all over ANY bmw, in any single way, since its not as good in any way, and know that they only reason why cadillac is even making cars that they make are bmw, mercedes and audi. Cadillac is the one trying to be like bmw or audi, not the other way around.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@derbigpr500 Audi, Mercedes or BMW are parts of the biggest car groups in the world...they make cars like Rolls Royce, Bentley, Bugatti, Maybach, Lamborghini....they make all the best cars in the world, not Cadillac, which makes only one decent car which is completely overrated because its 3 seconds a lap faster than a car with 60hp less around a 25 km long track. And apart from those 3 seconds, its worse in every single way....big fucking achievement.
@nielslernou I was sold on the cadilac just as soon as I realized that my 6'5" frame can sit comfortably in the back seat of a car that tops out at 193 mph, which an m3 cant either seat me in the back seat, or top 193 mph. An m3 is simply out classed in every way, now an m6, thats another story. If someone said an m6 was better, I really would argue, that would be all up to preference. But an m3? come on, thats just silly. Unless ur just a serious BMW fan, which theres nothing wrong with that.
@rehsa2194 the bmw is cheaper when you buy it in 4door version so its more practical than the m3 coupe and its cheaper i would like to see you do a 193 miles an hour on a daily public road..in the real world i would like to see how much the caddy would be faster. i only know it will be alot slower than on a track.and still.the bmw's interior isnt better looking but it is better built and no, im not a bmw fan..old bmws are for broke idiots that try to look cool.and im no bmw fan i love fiat
@rehsa2194 There is no point arguing what is better. I can say whatever I want, but you will still think CTS-V is better. So be it. Someone has to buy it too. But remember, CTS-V is from class ABOVE M3. Those cars shouldnt be compared in the first place. Outside dimensions of CTS-V are similar to M5, and CTS-V against M5 is just outclassed in every single way. What matter to me is how a car feels to drive, how it feels when you use it and this is where BMW is leaps ahead of any other sedans.
@rehsa2194 CTS-V feels like a cheap product inside. Build quality is FAR below BMW and Audi. Every button, every piece of material inside BMW and Audi is of highest possible quality. Everything is built solidly as rock. In CTS-V its not. Buttons are all over the place, lots of fake materials (fake chrome, fake carbon fibre, fake aluminum, fake leather and stitching on dash). And it some uses buttons, indicator stalks, light switches from 15000 dollar Opel models...which is just ridiculous.
@rehsa2194 What some people, americans in particular because they've been exposed to extremely bad cars in the last 20-30 years, dont understand, is the difference between premium car brands and non-premium car brands. Its enough to go and test drive a bmw 5 series and then test drive a cadillac cts, its enough to see why bmw is premium, and cadillac is not. Perfection in every detail and balance are the key words.
@rehsa2194 Another thing where Cadillac has no chance against BMW or Audi is the feeling of solidity. This is something that cant be described, you have to feel it when you drive the car. The feel that car is made of a solid piece of granite is probably the best way to explain. Its gives you confidence and feeling of safety that only german cars have. Again, this is one of the reason why M3 and RS5 are better cars. Its not all about data and 0-60 times, what matter is the feel of the car.
@rehsa2194 What i mean by "what matters is the feel of the car". Let me explain. Imagine going to a store to buy a new suit. You go to a cheap store, and ask for a suit. Even though that suit is the same size, and its dimensions are roughly the same, it wont feel as good on you as the expensive suit that is better tailored and made of better materials. Thats the difference between CTS-V or M3/RS5. Once you sit inside the seat and drive them, you wont care about 0.2 sec slower 0-60.
I'm sure that a Cadillac can take an m3 or rs5 on a straight road, but Americans don't understand the significance of corners.. so they don't bother making cars that can handle them.
tagerung90 21 hours ago
@tagerung90 the only 2 production sedans that can beat the CTS-V around the ring are the new Panamera Turbo and the new F10 M5.
UFCextra 7 hours ago
Comment removed
BiHFSA 2 days ago
Where the hell is the full video
dominicancheif117 2 days ago
The CTS-V is one of my favorite cars. It shouldn't be in that lineup however. You can't be comparing it to an M3 when it's smoking the M5 lol.
800hennessy 3 days ago
I'll take the audi is so SEXY...
xpectro82 4 days ago
i would not take the caddy over neither other two, and i know it is more powerfull than the others two...and for anyone saying "overpriced German cars" it's in the US u get Ripped off by dealers...damn everyone in germany has one...and y'all paying almost the same amount of money for domestic cars....incredible!
eBlackCaT 4 days ago
Anyone taking the CTS-V over the other two should be really mad! The CTS-V sure is a fast car and does looks fairly good, but that's it! everything else, from confort, built quality!, material used! reliability, resell value, security............. goes for the other two
InitialDAmine 5 days ago 2
mercedes c63 amg Black series
sharkdragon4 5 days ago
caddy is shitty. my father has a cts and its interior quality is AWFUL. shitty plastics EVERYWHERE, squeaks when you push on it, and the car isnt very reliable. my advice DONT BUY IT. Do yourself a favor
HereGoWeedSong34 1 week ago
car and river test r stupid the lap times at bnur prove everything
dojOdRiFTeR 1 week ago
BMW - best looking, best handling, best engine, best gearbox, best colour, best company. Best choice.
n8neiTen8n 1 week ago
Oh my godd its the lockness monster
Oh wait the lockness monster looks better than that crappy caddy
dukeboy1998 2 weeks ago
so what?
10191918182121 3 weeks ago
Just a thought, the US EPA figures for the Cadillac is 14 city/ 19 hwy and the BMW is 14/20.
rangerover06sc 3 weeks ago
@rangerover06sc For comparison sake, a 5.7L performance version of the Dodge Durango CUV( weighting more then 2.5 tonnes) gets the same figures as the M3. So don't think americans are the only ones who build gas guzzlers.
rangerover06sc 3 weeks ago
Where's the full video?
dominicancheif117 3 weeks ago
Cadillacs focus too much on the engine. It's more than that. It has to have that smooth, exhilarating, yet comfortable ride you can get in a car such as an RS5 Quattro. I wish RS's would come to the US already. Fuck ignorant America and its lame cars, I'm moving to Europe.
OneStrangeNight 3 weeks ago
@OneStrangeNight Stay where you are, faggot.
maersklandro 3 weeks ago
Caddilac´s CTS-V intention is just power, and nothing more...
Audi and BMW tries to create their cars suitable for daily use.
Achieving the performance of the cadillac with 564 HP is very easy.
But over 20 litres of gasoline is just really bad for a car in normal use, even for an american car.
If cadillac would try to achieve a similar ratio, it would not run over 60 miles an hour
StefanC4D 4 weeks ago
:D The cadillac is nonsense... In Europe, no one will buy this car, because its so ugly and heavy and its ridiculous consumption ... And in America no one will buy this car because it has a manual shift ^^
And in Asia they wont buy it because its no german car...
The audi has 120 less horse powers and still could beat the caddilac, especially in the curves and uses half the amount of gasoline...
StefanC4D 4 weeks ago
@StefanC4D no the audi cant beat the caddy, and its not heavy and ridiculous on consumption, go research the facts before you start talkin shit everywhere you go.. maybe your mad because your overpriced german cars are failing
W33Dblazer 4 weeks ago 5
@W33Dblazer
:D I don´t like Audi, BMW and Mercedes very much, because i see them so often, so i don´t care if they lose.
BUT: The Caddilac used 20.6 liter for 100km, so please, you should go research the facts... But in America this isnt that much, isnt it?
Above all... The Cadillac is one of the ugliest cars arround ^^
StefanC4D 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@W33Dblazer that cadillac is so fucking ugly that i have to take a shit every time i see it. for real.
TheMasterAndre1 2 weeks ago
@W33Dblazer failing? do you know whats happening to gm right now lol?
gickymobile1 1 week ago
@W33Dblazer if you think a car in this segement should only have performance you are the one that is mad, the German know how to built a quality product, that does everything, not going fast, and falling to pieces later on.
InitialDAmine 5 days ago
@W33Dblazer bently has a 34% increase in sales last year... luxury cars are selling very well. I live in boise fucking idaho and they have a dealer ship here and recently an R8 was sold.
G33kTech 4 days ago
@W33Dblazer also audi is selling VERY well in china. so much so they opened a plant there. Maybe you should do your research :-/
G33kTech 4 days ago
@W33Dblazer hahahaha but your ami faggot cars need to be testet on our german streets! so i think you failed ;)
deutschessoftair 2 days ago
@W33Dblazer The Audi could easily show the Cadi taillights any day. I'm pretty sure that Cadi is now using European engineering, and testing it on German roads. The ONLY reason that Cadillac is starting to be decent is sport quality is completely due to German engineering.
BiHFSA 2 days ago
@BiHFSA No, the Audi can't beat the Cadillac in anything. The CTS-V is better handling and faster around the ring than a C6 RS6 Avant. CTS-V kills the old M5 and new RS6 , so the RS5 doesn't have a chance here, nor does the M3 - not in any category here.
UFCextra 8 hours ago
@UFCextra The Audi can and will beat a Cadillac in anything. Better in handling, your funny. Have you seen European roads? The car is made with superior handling. Faster? It might have more horsepower, but not half of those horses reach the tires. It might win in a drag race. But add corners to a track the Audi will win.
BiHFSA 7 hours ago
@BiHFSA Why don't you check out the BEST lap time each car was capable of doing on Germany's Nordschleife (most famous race track in the world) ? CTS-V = 7:59 , C6 V10 RS6 Avant = 8:09 , not to mention CTS-V kills them on a track and in a straight line ......Audi can not touch this Cadillac. Only with their brand new R8. Audi RS6 top speed is 155/188 (limited/unlimited), Cadillac does 175/191mph (manual/auto).
UFCextra 3 hours ago
@BiHFSA I like new Audi's too - they're very nice and quattro is just amazing, but I would say Cadillac wins here.
UFCextra 3 hours ago
the back of the CTS is one of the ugliest ever designed
ostreds 1 month ago
they dont even have to say anything lol
TheAustinFleming 1 month ago
Caddy FTW
XxIrvineGamerxX 1 month ago
GM wins!
Jeremandre 1 month ago
Like German cars but the caddy wins simply on bang for Buck and reliability. Not to keen on the ass of the caddy though.
kayakangle 1 month ago
bmw
bombora23 1 month ago
The RS5 Is The Equivalent Of A M5 Not An M3
RandomRobbins 1 month ago
@RandomRobbins- heres you sign tard. the rs5 is a coupe. the m5 is a sedan.
smokerubberandlove 1 month ago
the m3 supercharged with the ess 725 package would blow these cars out
blacknight335 1 month ago
lol wait until the new m5 comes and whoops both the audis and that hideous caddis asses :)
drazza94 2 months ago
lalalala
zmbklrkiefer 2 months ago 5
Germans rock
1991rch 2 months ago
i love the cts-v alot but i think i would take the audi
jumper1294 2 months ago
The RS5 supercharged would wipe all 3 out
HMSAAB 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
cadillac = american garbage
8MunchenBayern8 2 months ago
m3, cts-v, rs5.
iloveparc 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
german cars are the best car
vatan1923 2 months ago
@vatan1923 Not according to consumer reports. Audis, mercedes and bmw are literally the worst car companies as far as reliability goes. But dont take my word for it. Look it up.
vwbigchris 2 months ago
@vwbigchris i know thats why its 2 expensive and so many people are dying to own one
vatan1923 2 months ago
@vwbigchris Most likely true. It's called chilehood sickness .. as with all new tech there are issues that have to be sorted out. A lot of 'low end' mfg. tend to copy ideas when they work and all the kinks have been sorted out. I.e. next gen BMW will have laser-light ... bet they will break, so does HUD, DCT, TT, Hydraulic Power steering, carbon fiber parts etc. If you want to lead, you need to take risks, and that does reflect the issues luxury brands have (RR being the exception).
goguhu 1 month ago
I am in no way saying that CTS-V is a bad car, its not, but people around youtube jump into conclusions a bit too fast, and will take every review for granted (especially when american reviewers compare american cars to foreign cars) without going deep and exploring every car in details. And when you go deep, you will see that M3 and RS5 are simply better cars than CTS-V, and you might also finaly figure out why some cars are branded as "premium cars" and others are not.
derbigpr500 2 months ago
First of all, you're comparing wrong cars. CTS-V is a car from higher segment than M3 and RS5. Only americans are biased enough to compare apples and oranges, just to prove their point. CTS-V has 560hp, RS5 and M3 have almost 150hp less, so how can you compare that? CTS-V should be compared to M5 and RS6, not M3 and RS5...whats next...comparing it to M1? Other than power, M3 and RS5 are much better cars than CTS-v, in every possible way, and faster around tracks, despite having much less power.
derbigpr500 3 months ago
Comment removed
derbigpr500 3 months ago
Audi or Bmw !!
MegaAerocool 3 months ago
rs5 is the best easily
youbisung12345 3 months ago
162 people watched this while their electric car was plugged in...
rt66pony 3 months ago
Caddy every day of the week.
No contest.
nolobede 3 months ago
Car and driver are speeding on highway! OMFGSH Lol
MrELstatic 3 months ago
Top gear copy cat?
Tracked350Z 3 months ago
Unleash the M .. lol
FR3K3Y 3 months ago
The Germans will always make a better car than the Americans, it has been this way for many years and will still be the same in years to come.
ramonj08 3 months ago
@ramonj08 Yeah, I just wish more americans knew what turning is. So in other words, I agree with you 100%
redman6657 3 months ago
Comment removed
marlinbike 3 months ago
BMW is the best . The F10 M5 is four seconds faster around the Nurburgring than a CTSV and the M3 is the dominant Performance cause it can beat the $80K Audi rs5 round the Top Gear Test track and has the M3 also has 12 Championship titles and 15 race wins in the Motorsport history of the M3 . What you know about that Audi fanboys
nukeonator 4 months ago
Audi=Guy with the small dick
BMW=Guy with the blue tooth earpiece and 2 tons of hair gel
Cadillac=Guy who's 95 years old
Pick your poison.
AnonymoussourceL0L 4 months ago
@AnonymoussourceL0L
JUST GO MERCEDES!! xD
jlfmPT 4 months ago
@jlfmPT But then Mercedes is a wife swapping fellow who drinks Busch light at fancy parties... there is no safe manufacture out there :((
AnonymoussourceL0L 4 months ago
The M3 has really lost everything it was so well known for. It sucks. :(
paintedd 4 months ago
just press the M button
tough931 4 months ago
bmw all the way! unleash the M power beast!
Saiko908 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Caddy is the real world winner for the bucks, hands down for urban driving. All that crap about how good the Germ cars do on bent mountain roads is irrevelant, if whenever you stomp on your beemer or outie's loud pedal, I smoke that azz in my V8 DaddyCaddy, what good is spending thousands more just so your ride can roll on the autobahn if it will never even see it, unless you already live near one?
MortalRon08 4 months ago
Comment removed
MortalRon08 4 months ago
Comment removed
MortalRon08 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the cadillac looks shitty as shit
eliastsutsi 4 months ago
prefer the saloon cts-v
TVRnGTR 4 months ago 12
@TVRnGTR Why do eurpeans say saloon? very serious question
Inklebonker1 2 months ago
@Inklebonker1 I am not entirely sure to be honest but i'm guessing its because they are large and spacious inside
TVRnGTR 2 months ago
@TVRnGTR its just odd to me because when you think saloon you think old western pubs
Inklebonker1 2 months ago
@Inklebonker1 It's just the British I think. France, Spain, Germany, Italy, ... all have different names. Same for Convertible vs Cabriolet
goguhu 1 month ago
@goguhu mhm
Inklebonker1 1 month ago
That was a terrible video
TaylorOpheim 5 months ago
m3 > all
The0rangePanda 5 months ago
@The0rangePanda TOTALLY AGREE! GO M3!
LazBro123 5 months ago
Audi... BMW... Cadillac. The A, B, C's of the heavy-hitting mid-range coupes...
goat6inboots 5 months ago
i for some reason prefer the cts-v sedan
tven99 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
cts-v gets beaten by 2012 f10 M3 and raped by 2012 f11 M5, in performance, technology, comfort and build quality.
torogami2 5 months ago
m3 all the way.
basballcarn 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
German cars > american cars
audi is the best
RealRapAndHiphp 5 months ago
American cars are the shittiest cars
TheGarvito 5 months ago
all junk
JustBeatItNow 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the CTS is FUGLY ! M5 F10 FUCKER !
turbokompressored 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK <3
telephonic 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
american cars are absolute rubbish....... they look terrible...handle terrible and are terrible for the enviroment.....no one in EU buys them cos american cars suck...... the american in this video has a bigger engine.only reason it won in a straigh line race.......on a track it would be absolute shocking against these supurb pieces of german engineering
telephonic 5 months ago
@telephonic the m3 runs a v8 just like the audi and CTS-v your an idiot its not the 90's anymore nobody other than porsche uses a 6cyl in a german sports car
streetpunk83 5 months ago
@telephonic I completley agree and im american
MrClarkified 5 months ago
@telephonic well said americans are too dumb to understand
TheGarvito 5 months ago
M3 is the suckiest
KatiushaVN4 5 months ago 4
lol at putting a yank car against the audi and bmw....... americans cannot make cars
telephonic 5 months ago
@telephonic i admit that German car are indeed good but there's one problem, THEY ALL LOOK THE SAME BMW looks like any other BMW same can be said about Porsche ,Audi,or and any other German car; does a ford focus look anything like a ford mustang, i think not
craker3833 5 months ago
@craker3833 ford focus was designed in the EU......... europeans were driving focus about 5 or 6 years before you were in america.........so stop taking credit for the ford focus in essence in design and looks that is european car with an american badge on it...........ps do not compare a ford to bmw audi porshe or benz....... stupid comparison
telephonic 5 months ago
@telephonic really um the Mustang Boss 302 beat the shit out of the m3 and numerous other german cars around laguna seca speedway so your statement makes no sense the CTS-V blows all four dour cars away around the nurb and the zr1 is barely outclassed by a car that cost 2.5 times more so you were saying?
streetpunk83 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@streetpunk83 hahaha...... i bet the mustang had like a 6 litre engine.......i just gogled that car it looks fucking horrible........i wouldnt take that car if someone offered it me free......... hell i wouldnt take any american car you offered me for free........ your cars are grotesque big engined horrible sounding crap handling bohemoths.
telephonic 5 months ago
@telephonic Actually the mustang is a 302ci 5 liter small block v8 an yet again your statement don't make any sense in this argument crap handling if there beating german cars around race tracks that would mean that the germans handling sucks and there cars are heavier and run big v8's anymore because there copying the americans why dontt you learn something about cars before you make more of an ass out of yourself
streetpunk83 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@streetpunk83 the caddy is shit and looks shit..... just like all american cars.....if someone offered me that shitty american car as a gift i would be disapointed....
telephonic 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@streetpunk83 Germany is copying America considering cars!? That's the most ridicolous thing I've ever heard! Take a detailed look at American and then at German cars and you'll realize the superior technology, design and quality of Aud, BMW and Merc!
Sunthaz 5 months ago
@Sunthaz There copying something the Americans learned long ago if you want to be competitive you need more displacement hence the M3 going to a v8 which BMW swore they'd never do because it'd upset the the weight distribution of the car German car in size have grown equal to American cars and they have also gone from turbo'd 4 and 6cyl engines to n/a v8s and the German technology used inst any better then Americans America just makes cars most people can afford Germans don't care about the cost
streetpunk83 5 months ago
@streetpunk83
The M3's v8 is lighter than the previous M3's I6.
Also, BMW's now going back to turbo 4s and 6s.
quackman 4 months ago
wtf......cadillac!
ditter360 5 months ago
Cadillac CTS-V Coupe Vs Bmw M3
Copy paste :) me racing with an M3 and also raced with a challenger SRT8 and GTR
DashtiVcoupeq8 5 months ago
Cadillac cts-v> audi&bmw
melovetorun 6 months ago 21
@melovetorun In uglyness it is...
8rvenom 4 months ago
@melovetorun That's Bieber's car
McWeslyF1 4 months ago
if yun took the RS5 looks, the power of that ugly looking V and the track handling of the M3, you had the greatest car in the world
FebruaryFreezesBlue 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Audi vs. rust bucket vs. scrapheap.
baldurus1 6 months ago
I'm sorry but that caddy's looks can only appeal to an american. And the fact that they keep comparing a 4l normally aspirated engine to a 6.2 supercharged and then bragging about the V's superiority is all the proof i need to stick to my sweet european built ride.
Bugumir 6 months ago
@Bugumir check out witch car cost more ...
manuel21863 5 months ago
Eh.. I guess I'm homo cuz I'd rock the Audi long before the others. M3's are common and so are V's.... something different. I just love Audi, always have.
japslapr 6 months ago
I came to see a motherfucking drag race.
cml4456 6 months ago
Comment removed
witt1978 6 months ago
Audi RS5 : The BEAST That Performs The Best
BMW M3 : Handles better than anything
CADILLAC CTS-V : Sounds Like A HYBRID :P
paranoid000rapper 6 months ago
that cts-v sounded like a hybrid or is it just me lol
sejfiu100 6 months ago
@sejfiu100 If you're referring to the whining, high pitched sound, that'd be the supercharger.
eduardo7584 6 months ago
BMW, folks, invented the sport sedan in 1962 with the 1500. They re-invented it in 1968 with the 2002tii. They innovated it in 1973 with the 2002 turbo (first turbocharged road car ever produced). They had made a bunch of good cars before that and they made a bunch of good cars after that. All that matters is the M3 has a lot of good stuff built into it. THE BEST STUFF.
NITROUSINJECTEDFISHY 6 months ago
The M3 is the best Track car from the 3, and the most fun to drive.
Exowar01 6 months ago
@Exowar01 Why do you say that? Every comparison in car magazines puts the CTS-V above the BMW M3.
duncreg 6 months ago
@duncreg In America, maybe ..., because here in Europe The best sports Coupe / Sedan with the most pleasure to drive is The BMW m3.
Exowar01 6 months ago
@duncreg not true... the gerneral verdict is that americans have come long way, and is almoste on the same level as the german... and the M3 is still king. V's might be good but they ain't german.
patrickh499 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@patrickh499 lol @ americans almost on same level as germans
telephonic 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@telephonic almoste... they never had, and never will
patrickh499 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@telephonic were surpassing the Germs with the 302 boss mustang the cts v and the zr1 vette i think its fair to say were better germany has 2 cars quicker than the USA the 911 gt2 rs beat the zr1 around the nurb barely and the SSC ultimate aero is still the 2nd fastest car in the world behind the Veyron super sport but it beat the first gen veyron so whats next for ssc and there 2nd gen aero it might crush the hearts of veyronss lovers.
streetpunk83 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@streetpunk83 even the 911 turbo has beaten the zr1...gt2 rs would destroy it!
Sunthaz 5 months ago
@Sunthaz lol smoke some more crack
CARandDRlVER 5 months ago
@Sunthaz zr1 > GT2 rs - porsche gets rocked by the zr1 - no porsche can come close. Go watch some more autocarUK
AutoLineDaily 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AutoLineDaily even the Americans say that the Porsche, even the 911 turbo is superior...check a video by "motortrend": /watch?v=5Qam_UvSKuM
Sunthaz 5 months ago
@KiddGalaxy i like Cadillacs and Mercedes-Benz, but it seems like instead of taking that big risk in making an entirely new car, they would've stuck with the basics. It may just be here in Louisiana, but the CTS-V isn't very popular. I've seen maybe two of them since they came out. So either they're super expensive or they aren't very popular.
TheJermaine2030 6 months ago
@TheJermaine2030 Running between $63K-$70K, I'd say the answer is "very expensive". :-) Even in New Jersey near New York City, I've only seen 3-5.
duncreg 6 months ago
I don't mind the CTS-V sedan or wagon but the coupe's rear looks hideous.
Hello6761 6 months ago
the new cadillac is fucking hideous. at least they made a cts-v sedan too but apparently they wanna make racing cars now.
TheJermaine2030 6 months ago
@TheJermaine2030 @TheJermaine2030 Taste is a very subjective thing... Indeed I absolutely love the new cts-v coupe. It is a stunning change from the mod oval cars that you see every where. The Art and Science design has given Cadillac a distinctive look from the rest of the field. And this is coming from a person who love's Merc Benz… These are the type of cars the American manufactures should have been making 15 years ago before the car collapse. I've been waiting for this car since 2006.
KiddGalaxxy 6 months ago
m3 wins...
hockeymo 6 months ago
rs5 is a beast! got respect 4 it
MrClarkey480 6 months ago
you realize the Cadillac is much faster and more powerful, m3 is the 2nd best here , the audi is a queer's car, audi made total shit poor cars until like 5 years ago
CARandDRlVER 6 months ago 3
@CARandDRlVER nice for letting us know your review is totally biased on the cadillac's advantage ,well guess what?fuck your videos and fuck the people who believe your reviews
nielslernou 5 months ago
@nielslernou How is it biased to say that the cadilac is better when you have two cars that are evenly priced. But with one offering wayyy more interior room, a considerably faster acceleration time, and slightly faster track speed, cheaper cost of maintanence, a higher quality, or at least more exciting interior, and only lacking in the prestige or heritage department. To me the car offering all of that plus another 130 extra horsepower and about 200 more tq is without question the better car.
rehsa2194 4 months ago
@rehsa2194 Way more interior room? CTS-V coupe has less space inside than BMW 1 series. It has a smaller boot than BMW 1 series. Cheaper cost of maintenance? So? A bike has a cheaper cost of maintenance as well. Higher quality? Dont be silly...CTS-V is nowhere near the quality of BMW or Audi. Fit and finish and material quality is on another level in german cars. Exciting interior? Well, if buttons scattered all over the place without any logic whatsoever is exciting to you...
derbigpr500 3 months ago
@derbigpr500 Maybe the sedan, but I don't want a sedan, I'd like a sports coupe. And the only sports coupes that seat 4 adult sized people comfortably that I've ever sat in, are a ctsv coupe, m6, bentley, or maybe dodge challenger. Out of those, bentley and m6 are too costly, and dodge isn't fast enough and cant handle as well. I and many people find the ctsv coupe for 60K to be one helluva buy, you dont agree and thats fine. Buy your BMW, but the caddy is every bit as good; all in preference.
rehsa2194 3 months ago
@rehsa2194 Do you know the dimensions of the CTS-V Coupe? 4788 mm long, 1882 mm wide, 1420 mm high with a wheelbase of crazy long 2880 mm. Do you know the dimensions of M3? 4615 mm long, 1817 mm wide, 1418 mm high with a wheelbase of 2761 mm.. Of course than the CTS-V coupe should have more room inside, it is much longer with longer wheelbase, it should have at least 15 cm more leg room inside, which it doesnt. Also, it has a boot of only 295 liters, M3 has 440 liters! So...
derbigpr500 2 months ago
@rehsa2194 My point is, even though CTS-V's are compared with M3's, they SHOULDN'T be, because they're in different categories. CTS-V is a much bigger car, it is in the same class or segment as M5 or M6. Or E class AMG, Audi RS6 or Jaguar XF. And even though 3 series is in a segment below, it beats the CTS in terms of build and feel of quality, fit and finish, materials used, luxury inside, noise inside cabin, refinement, smoothness, room, trunk size,stuff that should be better in CTS.
derbigpr500 2 months ago
@rehsa2194 Also, people seem to only look at speed and measured times, and nothing else. Which is COMPLETELY wrong. It doesn't even tell half the story about the car. For example...lets compare Mitsubitshi Evo X and Cadillac CTS-V. Evo X is faster around any track, it handles much better, it brakes much better, it even probably accelerates better. But would you say its a better car than CTS-V? You see my point? There is much more to a car than speed, and that is why M3 is still ahead of CTS-V.
derbigpr500 2 months ago
@derbigpr500 CTS-V is 100x better than an Evo X ...it's an Evo X !!! Shit-su-bishi ...a shitty ass jap car company
AutoLineDaily 2 months ago
@derbigpr500 And the CTS-V will shit all over ANY Bmw, ALL Audi's except the R8 V10 and almost all AMG's ....and the CTS's quality and refinement is better than Audi/BMW, the Cadillac will last longer because it is built better.
AutoLineDaily 2 months ago
@AutoLineDaily
F10 M5 > CTS-V (wagon, coupe, sedan).
idrift4wd 2 months ago
Comment removed
derbigpr500 2 months ago
@AutoLineDaily It will shit all over any BMW? What does that mean? I didnt know cars could take a shit. I'm guessing your brain is too weak to come up with a different expression, or you're simply 10 years old. Leave the car videos my friend and go comment on something that you're a little bit more familiar with. Cars obviously aren't your thing. I can't believe how ignorant and arrogant some people can be, no wonder the entire world hates americans, most are incredibly ignorant and dumb.
derbigpr500 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@derbigpr500 And i cant believe how ignorant some of you americans are. Cadillac has been making really shitty cars for the past 20 years, they havent invented a single piece of new technology or contributed to car industry in ANY SINGLE way, while BMW/Audi/Mercedes were developing new stuff, new technologys, coming up with new cutting edge technical solutions, which, Cadillac too is using today, same as 90% of other manufacturers. Thats why germans are AHEAD of others, they invent, not copy.
derbigpr500 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@derbigpr500 Without Audi, Mercedes or BMW, and a few other manufactufacturers in europe and japan, car industry today would be where it was in the 60's. They are the ones who are moving the car industry forward, they're the ones who set standards, they're the ones who come up with 90% of new technologies and technical solutions. They're the ones who build 15-20 different car models each, all of which set standards, unlike Cadillac who builds ONE single good car, and that one was copied too.
derbigpr500 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@derbigpr500 And thats why next time you wanna make yourself look like a moron and say something as dumb as "cadillac shits all over any bmw or audi", think about how stupid the thing you're aboout to say is. Know that cadillac cant shit all over ANY bmw, in any single way, since its not as good in any way, and know that they only reason why cadillac is even making cars that they make are bmw, mercedes and audi. Cadillac is the one trying to be like bmw or audi, not the other way around.
derbigpr500 2 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@derbigpr500 Audi, Mercedes or BMW are parts of the biggest car groups in the world...they make cars like Rolls Royce, Bentley, Bugatti, Maybach, Lamborghini....they make all the best cars in the world, not Cadillac, which makes only one decent car which is completely overrated because its 3 seconds a lap faster than a car with 60hp less around a 25 km long track. And apart from those 3 seconds, its worse in every single way....big fucking achievement.
derbigpr500 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@derbigpr500 warranties will prove my point. There is no sense in arguing .
AutoLineDaily 2 months ago
@nielslernou I was sold on the cadilac just as soon as I realized that my 6'5" frame can sit comfortably in the back seat of a car that tops out at 193 mph, which an m3 cant either seat me in the back seat, or top 193 mph. An m3 is simply out classed in every way, now an m6, thats another story. If someone said an m6 was better, I really would argue, that would be all up to preference. But an m3? come on, thats just silly. Unless ur just a serious BMW fan, which theres nothing wrong with that.
rehsa2194 4 months ago
@rehsa2194 the bmw is cheaper when you buy it in 4door version so its more practical than the m3 coupe and its cheaper i would like to see you do a 193 miles an hour on a daily public road..in the real world i would like to see how much the caddy would be faster. i only know it will be alot slower than on a track.and still.the bmw's interior isnt better looking but it is better built and no, im not a bmw fan..old bmws are for broke idiots that try to look cool.and im no bmw fan i love fiat
nielslernou 4 months ago
@rehsa2194 There is no point arguing what is better. I can say whatever I want, but you will still think CTS-V is better. So be it. Someone has to buy it too. But remember, CTS-V is from class ABOVE M3. Those cars shouldnt be compared in the first place. Outside dimensions of CTS-V are similar to M5, and CTS-V against M5 is just outclassed in every single way. What matter to me is how a car feels to drive, how it feels when you use it and this is where BMW is leaps ahead of any other sedans.
derbigpr500 3 months ago
@rehsa2194 CTS-V feels like a cheap product inside. Build quality is FAR below BMW and Audi. Every button, every piece of material inside BMW and Audi is of highest possible quality. Everything is built solidly as rock. In CTS-V its not. Buttons are all over the place, lots of fake materials (fake chrome, fake carbon fibre, fake aluminum, fake leather and stitching on dash). And it some uses buttons, indicator stalks, light switches from 15000 dollar Opel models...which is just ridiculous.
derbigpr500 3 months ago
@rehsa2194 What some people, americans in particular because they've been exposed to extremely bad cars in the last 20-30 years, dont understand, is the difference between premium car brands and non-premium car brands. Its enough to go and test drive a bmw 5 series and then test drive a cadillac cts, its enough to see why bmw is premium, and cadillac is not. Perfection in every detail and balance are the key words.
derbigpr500 3 months ago
@rehsa2194 Another thing where Cadillac has no chance against BMW or Audi is the feeling of solidity. This is something that cant be described, you have to feel it when you drive the car. The feel that car is made of a solid piece of granite is probably the best way to explain. Its gives you confidence and feeling of safety that only german cars have. Again, this is one of the reason why M3 and RS5 are better cars. Its not all about data and 0-60 times, what matter is the feel of the car.
derbigpr500 3 months ago
@rehsa2194 What i mean by "what matters is the feel of the car". Let me explain. Imagine going to a store to buy a new suit. You go to a cheap store, and ask for a suit. Even though that suit is the same size, and its dimensions are roughly the same, it wont feel as good on you as the expensive suit that is better tailored and made of better materials. Thats the difference between CTS-V or M3/RS5. Once you sit inside the seat and drive them, you wont care about 0.2 sec slower 0-60.
derbigpr500 3 months ago
fuck cadillac, what a piece of american shit, and im american!
335ipower11 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
America must make there own cars, European cars stay in Europa,i hope audi rs5 don t go to USA.
America you have your own war car the hummer
XayraX91 6 months ago
audi the best , m3 is good but the caddy sucks asss
XayraX91 6 months ago
Audi wins, caddy is garbage
brochill69 6 months ago
I prefer the CTSV as a 4 door.
thetaoofken 6 months ago