What are you basing that on? The solitary riots that occurred in August? And i don't see the point in bringing up their race given there were plenty of white people rioting then. Violence has declined constantly throughout the last century, so I'd say times are getting better.
How sad is it that in those days, most of the rioters were decent whites, fighting for what is right, fighting for a good cause, these days, rioters are mostly black or asian, are using violence and are fighting for no good reason at all... how times have changed (for the worse)...
---------------------------->>>> In 1913, black people had to riot in a different spot than whites!!
'OooKayy, and your point is..?? what exactly, Ya Prat!
.. This film highlights an era for its time and those involved in the film! Why not tell us what knickers ur grand mother wore in 1913 whilst you're leading us away from the topic!
Wonderful to see this. These women were so brave - did you know that Gandhi was inspired by the Pankhursts' example? He watched their tactics for suffrage and adapted them to create his own ideas of non-violent resistance. This bit of history has largely been ignored. Gandhi is revered and the Suffragists are mocked in most places. Strange, isn't it?
Then, the police were the pride of Britain, with respect from all and doing their duty and not being hampered by stupid laws. Today, i watch videos of people giving death threats to the police and attacking them, and not being able to do anything back because of over the top human right laws. Its sad and scary to know their society was better then ours are nearly 98 years on. the rioters of these times would of been horrified by the violence shown in ours today.
Then, the police were the pride of Britain, with respect from all and doing their duty and not being hampered by stupid laws. Today, i watch videos of people giving death threats to the police and attacking them, and not being able to do anything back becau
@richardsbrandonuca But still to deny an entire group of people not to be allowed to vote based purely on their gender is disgusting. These women were brave and corageous souls.
But denying a whole group of people the vote cause of their social class, ie working class men, or forcing a whole group of people off to a murderous War because of their gender is not a problem for you? (nearly 1 million British men died in WW1, 30,000 on the 1st day of the Battle of the Somme alone).
Stop applying a 21st Century moral lens to events of 100yrs ago. Unless of course a petty foot soldier in a gender war, which would seem you are.
Courageous upper class souls who cared little about votes for lower class men, and were part of the recruiting drive to send men off to war and die. Lets not forget the White Feather Campaign either. Read about Pankhurst more deeply.
(Just thought I apply the same lens you felt fit to use)
@richardsbrandonuca How do you know? Did you travel back in time in your tardis and speak to all these women individually? Either that or you have a crystal ball. You genius.
@richardsbrandonuca No not really. Well perhaps, half-heartedly. I have this thing called a life you see. I just saw a comment typed by an overly self-important cyber intellectual and I thought I would give my opinion. That's all.
@richardsbrandonuca The jockey who rode over the suffragette at the races did not have the vote either: he was part of the King's stables, and servants of the aristocracy were denied suffrage. FOOD FOR THOUGHT!
I'm in no waying denying every adult's right to be able to vote for the corrupt, self-serving, party line-toeing imbecile of their choice, however, has anyone noticed the trend of women demanding to be part of something, then that something immediately turning to crap?
The same people who frown on the 1950s as old fashioned and oppressive to women and poor people often go on to cite medievial muslims as decent and disciplined people (lol). They also cite the early commonwealth immigrants as 'well behaved and law abiding', forgetting that when they came over here they were in far smaller numbers and that that success was in actual part to the Empire's long held civilising influence. To this day many old commonwealth countries rule by the 1950s model.
oh my goodness..what wonderfully preserved footage of a most historical event. The clarity is still perfect. And you can clearly see the emotion in peoples faces..man its amazing to take a peek lookin back.
I never know whether to be thankful to the suffragettes for giving us women more rights, or to hate them for making us have to look after the house and family AND go to work!!!
Nostalgic to see films of "Old" London. An age when our capital was still largely populated by indigenous people and not as today "home" to so many from far and wide. A more gentle and peaceful time.
you're all "from far and wide." for various reasons your ancestors came from somewhere else. If you want to recognize anyone for being "indigenous" the Danes have more of a claim than anyone. Even they came "from far and wide"
@TheWhitehall If you take an discussion/debate back far enough, it could be argued that the human being evolved from sea life!
The simple fact being, that in less than a human lifetime, the population of the UK particuarly that of major cities,none more so than London, has become a global melting pot. And has altered in a relatively short time,the make up of our Country. My own linage can be traced to Lincolnshire and Northumberland. Britain, geographically is a mid northern european nation .
How many of the young people in this film died during the Ist or 2nd world wars? People couldn't have imagined the horrors yet to come and itsconsequences.
oh shut up fucking moaning ,you women are always bragging how you can make your own desicions so dont give me all the objects of men bollocks . you can decide for yourself who you want to sleep with knowones forcing you.
@voxfox1991 get fuck we could run the world blind.all you man think of is sex if your not haveing it you"s are thinking way of getting.know wonder there more lesbian out there and yes i am one of them WOMENS RIGHT!!!
Jerry bombed the daylights out of this place...good thing too you know; with it getting all run-down and shabby. Saved us the trouble & cost of having it demolished.
Britbabe I have been working in Britain for 39 years I am from Longsight in Manchester and grew up very poor, but I am working class, not because we had nowt growing up,but because we work hard.
So called middle class work hard too, a lot of so called working class are on benefits nowadays and the culture of work is deminitioned I feel. Making remarks about class distinction is a folly - education is key to a fulfilling life.
Elerline Pankhurst though brave, was nevertheless a middle class philanthropist on a middle class campaign for middle class women. Working class women do have a right to vote. but many don't use it as they view it has no benefit to them and their lives.
@britbabe SLYVIA Pankhurst championed WORKING CLASS women!! Interesting comment my aunt a union organizer had no use for the vote--nevertheless even if it has no benefit, it Is a intolerable humiliation to be denied the right to vote the way women (esp working class women) were or black people in The American south.
Actually, abuse of women and girls was very very common in the servant class, and unwed mothers were the rule before marriage, if they were able to marry. Their children, if their fathers were well off were either kept in the family nursery with the legitimate children (if the mother was a servant) or sent home to the village to be cared for by relatives. Many went to Utah via a fund that paid for a ticket that included food and was paid into when the mothers were married and able to marry.
@agentk1986And where is the support for the BA flight attendants' strike? Most of these are poorly paid women. It is ironic that they're strike is being lead by men!
People didn't care about unwed mothers back then or now, your baby would have been given 2deserving married people & u wid b thrown in a sinbin run by nuns & enslaved with domestic drudgery if your family disowned u which was v likely. Now unwed mothers can attempt 2 keep their kids & the domestic drudgery & poverty r kept nicely hidden away in the 1parent homes which r demonised as the root cause of societys ills lol breakdown of community,family, economy are all linked & is part of the agenda.
Well, Thats kind of a loaded question. Years ago when girls were shamed when they were unwed and pregnant, people actually cared. Now, its matter of fact. About half of babies born are to unwed mothers. The fact that these kids are brought up outside of a traditional family setting may not be a bad thing in and of itself, but it's gotten to the point with broken homes&absent parents as "the norm" that society IS Crumbling , whether or not you want to admit it. And THAT's whats a sad disgrace!
@codelocator The idea that prosperity can be found in little strips of paper that cant' be eaten, can't be used as clothing or shelter, and can't be used when you're dead and gone is always an illusion.
@codelocator Actually, the fact that you know you exist proves at very least that you exist. If you did not sense anything, not even your own self, you would not exist.
Truly most humanists, rationalists, and college students place their faith in science, money, and their teachers. This is not completely a bad thing, but I would not call reading something from a textbook, no matter how reputable, and believing what is in that book, reason. It's faith. Faith that you are not being lied to.
@codelocator Actually, faith is very useful when applied. Consider the fertility rate, for example. Modern Western education is for the most part irreligious, yes? Generally, the more "education" one has 1) the more monetary income you generate, 2) the less religious one is, and 3) the fewer children you have. Given the statistics, the richer, less religious populace of the West, China, and Japan will suffer from a drastic population decrease in decades to come.
@codelocator However, the more religious you are, the less income you make, and the higher your fertility rate. This means that religious populations (the Moslems, Hispanic Catholics, and the like) are more likely to flourish in terms of population. The point? Ultimately irreligiosity results in a higher GDP, but religion results in a larger population, and money is useless unless there are people to make it useful, so I will keep my faith and your can keep your technology and money.
@codelocator As for me and religious faith, I believe in a God that led my forefathers out of Egypt, to a land of promise, and ultimately gave salvation to the world. In a world that thinks it has uncovered many of the mysteries of the natural world, it is tragic that it no longer appreciates the One who made these phenomenons possible. Many of the pioneering scientists like Newton and Copernicus sought to use science not to distance man from God, but to bring him closer.
In that sense I've no problem with your beliefs in 'god', as long as it tolerates others. I call it 'nature'. I agree, we do seem to suffer a lack of appreciation. But we must tolerate that too, to progress. In the quieter valleys of the Keralan ghats in India, an ancient and sincere reverence still hangs in the air. It's very beautiful. I don't think that exists in very many places anymore but I imagine once it was common.
@beefnotfish piss off with your old moralist dogma. ( I was first going to suggest you drop dead, but with an outdated attittude like yours you probably already have. )
I remember the so called Poll tax riot's in the 90's I was there, the Police were 'gunning' for one and all,they Implemented agitators to justify their brutality, and again the criminal justice bill act protests later went the same way.
Thanks for your message. We always use the original title of the film, not a description of its contents. However the words 'suffrage' and 'suffragettes' are both tag words that we have allocated so users should find the film that way.
I assume there was only one hat store...
millers3888 4 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Watch Emma West Lady On The Tram Exclusive Police Interview. Copy and paste: watch?v=H2je4MHUd4s into youtube
LetsShineNow 1 week ago
What are you basing that on? The solitary riots that occurred in August? And i don't see the point in bringing up their race given there were plenty of white people rioting then. Violence has declined constantly throughout the last century, so I'd say times are getting better.
tomorelli 1 month ago
How sad is it that in those days, most of the rioters were decent whites, fighting for what is right, fighting for a good cause, these days, rioters are mostly black or asian, are using violence and are fighting for no good reason at all... how times have changed (for the worse)...
discocreator76 2 months ago
I can't help noticing subtle differences between the 'riots' depicted here and the ones we had in London recently :-).
danvonranger 3 months ago
you wait an hour for a bus then 6 come along at once, nothings changed much in 100 years
lightowler111 3 months ago
I like the guy with the bowler hat and cane strolling like a boss.
garply101 3 months ago
That's a RIOT? Wow. I wonder what wars were like.
sibeliandrift 4 months ago
That one guy with the cane and the Derby Hat just didnt give a fuck! lol. But seriously this is a really neat video.
CrashOverideHTP 5 months ago 2
@CrashOverideHTP english gentlemen always looked mint and never lost their cool
zilbiol 4 months ago
Riots have come such a long way since those days
Rapchaid 5 months ago
amazing footage of miss pankhurst
lokiop345 5 months ago
Comment removed
RoarAli 5 months ago
haha, a riot?! THIS isn't a riot!
.
the damn brits are out for some afternoon tea....
ZamolxisReborn 6 months ago
seriously, people today do NOT wear enough hats
Verooo777 6 months ago
TRAFALGAR SQUARE WILL ALWAYS BE THERE!
LilyStyla 6 months ago
Herstory!
verdew8181 7 months ago
Amazing those `omnibuses` didnt just topple over. Maybe they did?
chanctonbury63 10 months ago
In 1913, black people had to riot in a different spot than whites.
/
In this case, Birmingham.
CommentorX 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CommentorX
---------------------------->>>> In 1913, black people had to riot in a different spot than whites!!
'OooKayy, and your point is..?? what exactly, Ya Prat!
.. This film highlights an era for its time and those involved in the film! Why not tell us what knickers ur grand mother wore in 1913 whilst you're leading us away from the topic!
Asshole!
yaniska100 6 months ago
all of them r dead
phamjohnny11 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@phamjohnny11 and soon we will be too
tommy444able 8 months ago
I love how tame this riot is by modern standards!
tomsega 10 months ago
all well dressed .. no scanty clothes
russfern 11 months ago
My God, but the british riot politely.
emmers57 11 months ago
@emmers57 not any more!
chanctonbury63 10 months ago
Wonderful to see this. These women were so brave - did you know that Gandhi was inspired by the Pankhursts' example? He watched their tactics for suffrage and adapted them to create his own ideas of non-violent resistance. This bit of history has largely been ignored. Gandhi is revered and the Suffragists are mocked in most places. Strange, isn't it?
yelloworangered 1 year ago
Hats
realgunslinger 1 year ago
i think all people with bad manners should be shot,except for buster blood vessel cos he can't help himself.
paranoidpaul1 1 year ago
Then, the police were the pride of Britain, with respect from all and doing their duty and not being hampered by stupid laws. Today, i watch videos of people giving death threats to the police and attacking them, and not being able to do anything back because of over the top human right laws. Its sad and scary to know their society was better then ours are nearly 98 years on. the rioters of these times would of been horrified by the violence shown in ours today.
MrGezamo 1 year ago
Then, the police were the pride of Britain, with respect from all and doing their duty and not being hampered by stupid laws. Today, i watch videos of people giving death threats to the police and attacking them, and not being able to do anything back becau
MrGezamo 1 year ago
Comment removed
MrGezamo 1 year ago
It is forgotten that many men did not have the vote in the UK either. Some facts:-
Reform Act 1832:- Resulted in 15% males having the vote.
Representation of the People Act 1884:- Increased suffrage but still over 40% of males did not have the vote.
Representation of the People Act 1918:- Universal suffrage for males over 21 females over 30.
Representation of the People Act 1928 - Votes for all over 21.
In photos the policemen arresting the suffragettes did not have the vote either.
richardsbrandonuca 1 year ago 10
@richardsbrandonuca But still to deny an entire group of people not to be allowed to vote based purely on their gender is disgusting. These women were brave and corageous souls.
TheSolitaryHeart 3 months ago
@TheSolitaryHeart
But denying a whole group of people the vote cause of their social class, ie working class men, or forcing a whole group of people off to a murderous War because of their gender is not a problem for you? (nearly 1 million British men died in WW1, 30,000 on the 1st day of the Battle of the Somme alone).
Stop applying a 21st Century moral lens to events of 100yrs ago. Unless of course a petty foot soldier in a gender war, which would seem you are.
richardsbrandonuca 3 months ago
@TheSolitaryHeart
re: "These women were brave and corageous souls."
Courageous upper class souls who cared little about votes for lower class men, and were part of the recruiting drive to send men off to war and die. Lets not forget the White Feather Campaign either. Read about Pankhurst more deeply.
(Just thought I apply the same lens you felt fit to use)
richardsbrandonuca 3 months ago
@richardsbrandonuca How do you know? Did you travel back in time in your tardis and speak to all these women individually? Either that or you have a crystal ball. You genius.
TheSolitaryHeart 3 months ago
@TheSolitaryHeart Is that actaully intended to be a serious response? Good grief.
richardsbrandonuca 3 months ago
@richardsbrandonuca No not really. Well perhaps, half-heartedly. I have this thing called a life you see. I just saw a comment typed by an overly self-important cyber intellectual and I thought I would give my opinion. That's all.
TheSolitaryHeart 3 months ago
@TheSolitaryHeart
ROTFL, You start an argument, get creamed then resort to insults. You go girl, give 'im heck.
ZimbaZumba 2 months ago
@ZimbaZumba It's only an argument if you choose to respond. "You go girl" Don't go sweet on me.
TheSolitaryHeart 2 months ago
@richardsbrandonuca The jockey who rode over the suffragette at the races did not have the vote either: he was part of the King's stables, and servants of the aristocracy were denied suffrage. FOOD FOR THOUGHT!
Mascherina1964 3 months ago
@Mascherina1964 Good points, well said.
richardsbrandonuca 3 months ago
@19smokey19 I agree
oOKIERANOo95 1 year ago
I'm in no waying denying every adult's right to be able to vote for the corrupt, self-serving, party line-toeing imbecile of their choice, however, has anyone noticed the trend of women demanding to be part of something, then that something immediately turning to crap?
ubreakinmepatlisa 1 year ago
The same people who frown on the 1950s as old fashioned and oppressive to women and poor people often go on to cite medievial muslims as decent and disciplined people (lol). They also cite the early commonwealth immigrants as 'well behaved and law abiding', forgetting that when they came over here they were in far smaller numbers and that that success was in actual part to the Empire's long held civilising influence. To this day many old commonwealth countries rule by the 1950s model.
rubysson57 1 year ago
The British sure have polite riots.
windysan 1 year ago 9
@windysan not them all, watch "peterloo massacre manchester" working class butchered by troops
haybee12 2 days ago
Amazing street scenes.
katakisLives 1 year ago
Why didn't the Britlanders just shoot them all like they do every where that they are pillaging?
charliebarosio 1 year ago
the police were tough then, not little pussys like they are now...
19smokey19 1 year ago
VOTES FOR WOMEN! Ooops! Im 97 years late!
neil73 1 year ago
I love how everyone are so well dress for a riot, if you look at today's riot like at the G20 in Toronto. People are almost naked
coolcoolcoolest 1 year ago
oh my goodness..what wonderfully preserved footage of a most historical event. The clarity is still perfect. And you can clearly see the emotion in peoples faces..man its amazing to take a peek lookin back.
funfabmegan 1 year ago
I never know whether to be thankful to the suffragettes for giving us women more rights, or to hate them for making us have to look after the house and family AND go to work!!!
1979LITTLEMISS 1 year ago
Nostalgic to see films of "Old" London. An age when our capital was still largely populated by indigenous people and not as today "home" to so many from far and wide. A more gentle and peaceful time.
TheWhitehall 1 year ago
@TheWhitehall
you're all "from far and wide." for various reasons your ancestors came from somewhere else. If you want to recognize anyone for being "indigenous" the Danes have more of a claim than anyone. Even they came "from far and wide"
badgeless 1 year ago
@TheWhitehall If you take an discussion/debate back far enough, it could be argued that the human being evolved from sea life!
The simple fact being, that in less than a human lifetime, the population of the UK particuarly that of major cities,none more so than London, has become a global melting pot. And has altered in a relatively short time,the make up of our Country. My own linage can be traced to Lincolnshire and Northumberland. Britain, geographically is a mid northern european nation .
TheWhitehall 1 year ago
so scary to ride bus like this ))
wla7777 1 year ago
How many of the young people in this film died during the Ist or 2nd world wars? People couldn't have imagined the horrors yet to come and itsconsequences.
HernanCortes1521 1 year ago 2
@HernanCortes1521 USSR imagened the whole horror of both wars! more than 20 million USSR citizens died just in Second World War!!
wla7777 1 year ago
Definitely unruly! My word!
BeeRich33 1 year ago
CRack
benisnowsober 1 year ago
should of stuck to the washing and ironing for fuck sake ٩ (̾●̮̮̃̾•̃̾)۶
AmariSings 1 year ago
Amazing footage, especially the bit where the police are seen escorting Sylvia Pankhurst away.
Go BFIfilms.
youtubister 1 year ago 3
Haha! Loved the bit at the end when the backlog of buses just started ploughing through the crowd. The BFI are legends.
pete6256 1 year ago
wanna hear a joke?
women's rights
HAHAHA
DozaSlayer 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i think only women should vote. they have no idea about it and it dont matter anyway.
danceheavon 1 year ago
Well that is a valid point. But us feminists have a long way to go. This is particularly as women are still objects and chatels of men.
britbabe1 1 year ago
oh shut up fucking moaning ,you women are always bragging how you can make your own desicions so dont give me all the objects of men bollocks . you can decide for yourself who you want to sleep with knowones forcing you.
and if you hate men that much become a lesbian.
voxfox1991 1 year ago
@voxfox1991 get fuck we could run the world blind.all you man think of is sex if your not haveing it you"s are thinking way of getting.know wonder there more lesbian out there and yes i am one of them WOMENS RIGHT!!!
0501tyson 1 year ago
Jerry bombed the daylights out of this place...good thing too you know; with it getting all run-down and shabby. Saved us the trouble & cost of having it demolished.
kennethj1956 1 year ago
if you were hat business you were a millionaire
olebaj 1 year ago 3
Britbabe I have been working in Britain for 39 years I am from Longsight in Manchester and grew up very poor, but I am working class, not because we had nowt growing up,but because we work hard.
So called middle class work hard too, a lot of so called working class are on benefits nowadays and the culture of work is deminitioned I feel. Making remarks about class distinction is a folly - education is key to a fulfilling life.
jnmklo9 2 years ago 5
Elerline Pankhurst though brave, was nevertheless a middle class philanthropist on a middle class campaign for middle class women. Working class women do have a right to vote. but many don't use it as they view it has no benefit to them and their lives.
britbabe1 2 years ago
@britbabe SLYVIA Pankhurst championed WORKING CLASS women!! Interesting comment my aunt a union organizer had no use for the vote--nevertheless even if it has no benefit, it Is a intolerable humiliation to be denied the right to vote the way women (esp working class women) were or black people in The American south.
vivascargill 1 year ago
Actually, abuse of women and girls was very very common in the servant class, and unwed mothers were the rule before marriage, if they were able to marry. Their children, if their fathers were well off were either kept in the family nursery with the legitimate children (if the mother was a servant) or sent home to the village to be cared for by relatives. Many went to Utah via a fund that paid for a ticket that included food and was paid into when the mothers were married and able to marry.
DadsBlueAngel 2 years ago
And people wonder why Utah is the way it is now...
agentk1986 2 years ago 2
@agentk1986And where is the support for the BA flight attendants' strike? Most of these are poorly paid women. It is ironic that they're strike is being lead by men!
britbabe1 1 year ago
People didn't care about unwed mothers back then or now, your baby would have been given 2deserving married people & u wid b thrown in a sinbin run by nuns & enslaved with domestic drudgery if your family disowned u which was v likely. Now unwed mothers can attempt 2 keep their kids & the domestic drudgery & poverty r kept nicely hidden away in the 1parent homes which r demonised as the root cause of societys ills lol breakdown of community,family, economy are all linked & is part of the agenda.
smmeegal 2 years ago
Comment removed
ChaOsAngEL1973 2 years ago
...oh stop being whingeing "victim" and get off your knees.
whereitsat309 2 years ago 2
can someone tell me what they were rioting about it looked like a protest more than a riot tho not much damage and fighting going on
soudyman 2 years ago
all ppl are equal its just that some do better then others and through out history both men and wemon have done great and stupid things
open your mind! and i wonder if your wife knows you wrote this?????
BLOWMEV8 2 years ago
Comment removed
iwasknownasthewild1 2 years ago
mmm, I agree and a ridiculous number of men such as leesetters who cannot spell, thank the Lord for smart women.
Christinepeake 2 years ago
1913, little did they know how all their lives were about to change!
9Fabian 2 years ago 2
Too right, how many mad single mother broken families and lesbian converts have brought downfall of our model civilized society?
zupantrzyglowa 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Too right, how many mad single mother broken families and lesbian converts have brought downfall of our model civilized society?
WTF???? you play medievil sword fighting????
you are a dork that dosent want to live in this world...fantasy land man
BLOWMEV8 2 years ago
Wonder why your comment is rejected, are we really in medieval time!?
glantz91 2 years ago
Well, Thats kind of a loaded question. Years ago when girls were shamed when they were unwed and pregnant, people actually cared. Now, its matter of fact. About half of babies born are to unwed mothers. The fact that these kids are brought up outside of a traditional family setting may not be a bad thing in and of itself, but it's gotten to the point with broken homes&absent parents as "the norm" that society IS Crumbling , whether or not you want to admit it. And THAT's whats a sad disgrace!
beefnotfish 2 years ago 17
@beefnotfish Partly true, but back then if a girl was 'shamed', she and baby ended up in the Workhouse - a fate literaly worse than death!
neil73 1 year ago
@beefnotfish
Your stable society always an illusion.
codelocator 1 year ago
@codelocator The idea that prosperity can be found in little strips of paper that cant' be eaten, can't be used as clothing or shelter, and can't be used when you're dead and gone is always an illusion.
GenghisKhan44 1 year ago
@GenghisKhan44
Well, I suppose it is. The solidity and permanence of objects, that's another illusion. Feel free to post your own illusion.
codelocator 1 year ago
@codelocator One thing, and one thing alone is permanent: God. At His hands, even existence itself is questionable.
GenghisKhan44 1 year ago
@GenghisKhan44
It's questionable with or without a god. Reason is more admirable than belief.
codelocator 1 year ago
@codelocator Actually, the fact that you know you exist proves at very least that you exist. If you did not sense anything, not even your own self, you would not exist.
Truly most humanists, rationalists, and college students place their faith in science, money, and their teachers. This is not completely a bad thing, but I would not call reading something from a textbook, no matter how reputable, and believing what is in that book, reason. It's faith. Faith that you are not being lied to.
GenghisKhan44 1 year ago
@GenghisKhan44
You're confusing that application of reason and probability with faith. They're not the same. Descartes was at least right about that.
codelocator 1 year ago
@codelocator Actually, faith is very useful when applied. Consider the fertility rate, for example. Modern Western education is for the most part irreligious, yes? Generally, the more "education" one has 1) the more monetary income you generate, 2) the less religious one is, and 3) the fewer children you have. Given the statistics, the richer, less religious populace of the West, China, and Japan will suffer from a drastic population decrease in decades to come.
GenghisKhan44 1 year ago
@codelocator However, the more religious you are, the less income you make, and the higher your fertility rate. This means that religious populations (the Moslems, Hispanic Catholics, and the like) are more likely to flourish in terms of population. The point? Ultimately irreligiosity results in a higher GDP, but religion results in a larger population, and money is useless unless there are people to make it useful, so I will keep my faith and your can keep your technology and money.
GenghisKhan44 1 year ago
@codelocator As for me and religious faith, I believe in a God that led my forefathers out of Egypt, to a land of promise, and ultimately gave salvation to the world. In a world that thinks it has uncovered many of the mysteries of the natural world, it is tragic that it no longer appreciates the One who made these phenomenons possible. Many of the pioneering scientists like Newton and Copernicus sought to use science not to distance man from God, but to bring him closer.
GenghisKhan44 1 year ago
Comment removed
codelocator 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GenghisKhan44
In that sense I've no problem with your beliefs in 'god', as long as it tolerates others. I call it 'nature'. I agree, we do seem to suffer a lack of appreciation. But we must tolerate that too, to progress. In the quieter valleys of the Keralan ghats in India, an ancient and sincere reverence still hangs in the air. It's very beautiful. I don't think that exists in very many places anymore but I imagine once it was common.
codelocator 1 year ago
@beefnotfish piss off with your old moralist dogma. ( I was first going to suggest you drop dead, but with an outdated attittude like yours you probably already have. )
cromlek 5 months ago
mad to think that women where thought of as not smart enough not to be able to vote!
jamierourketen 2 years ago 4
harods must be having a big sale
krogers1048 3 years ago
Way to downplay one of history's biggest political movements.
CanCanPooPoo 2 years ago 2
haha
Sol1forskibadee 2 years ago
i really wonder how world is going to look like in 100 years... we will never see it :(
LukasDiSparrow 3 years ago 2
Speak for yourself. I'm going to kick death in the balls when it comes for me.
Phranky 2 years ago 5
I remember the so called Poll tax riot's in the 90's I was there, the Police were 'gunning' for one and all,they Implemented agitators to justify their brutality, and again the criminal justice bill act protests later went the same way.
Thanks for uploading.
psuedosurfer 3 years ago
My brother was 'on a date' at the Poll Tax Riot Day.. he bumped into it.
cyclepod1 2 years ago
brilliant vid
GARYMOORE1952no1fan 3 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I think that those poor ladies would have shot themselves in the head if they knew what the female suffrage has led to.
eternalwanker 3 years ago
looks like a christmas sale rush rather than a riot
Squeaky4CC 3 years ago
didn't look like much of a riot
Commentarian1 3 years ago
00:39 "It may be a riot but it's certainly not going to stop me walking with my cane"
sweetcatatoniauk 3 years ago 5
Thank goodness for the BFI making this sort of thing available. Wonderful stuff.
Sibelius92 3 years ago 36
thanks for preserving old footage with an interesting point of view, can one use it as ref on new stuff! Chris
chrisconil 3 years ago
Pity you didnt put the word suffrage in the title, more people would see it then, who are searing for it!
bundleHastings 3 years ago
Thanks for your message. We always use the original title of the film, not a description of its contents. However the words 'suffrage' and 'suffragettes' are both tag words that we have allocated so users should find the film that way.
BFIfilms 3 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wouldn't be so bad if any of em today were worth voting for!!
praskovia13 3 years ago