@jimabbey1964 Yeah, what if I tell you that making this and other freeware got me some job offers for professional 3d modeling? Please think before you talk... Or write, in this case...
@jimabbey1964 yeah, pick on the language issues, that's really what a reasonable person does... (in portuguese write and type are the same word, but you wouldn't know that, would you?) In addition to the other comment: Well, I made this and other planes, plus a whole arcade game and a full size, functional electric car. What do you have to show for yourself? I don't buy payware not because I don't have the money, but because I don't need them....
@youdontknowxpand I use FS for the simulator abilities, not to show that I have the most realistic looking scenery or plane. I just want a software to simulate my designs.
Xpand, I'm in a love/hate relationship with your designs. I love 'em because they're so awesome, and I hate them because you make it look so damn easy!
The Greatest SCIENTIFIC Explanation. The SPIRIT Lives! HEAVENLY FATHER HAS APPEARED AND HE WALKS AMONG US. Only the Creator Himself can reveal His vision as His own. All the FUTURE He forwards in his gift to humanity..// watch LA PAROLA IN CUATRO and merge with the greatest pronouncement and the highest science, as He reveals all Creation. Watch and rejoice…this one is Real !! Yes, it is He ! @ La Parola In Cuatro. (He even looks like ZEUS !! )
OKAY Folks, The implications here are astounding, IMAGINE a Nation Like the U.S. OR JAPAN building a Full Scale version of this and THEN Placing a HONDA ROBOT in it instead of a Human and u can see where that could go RIGHT ?
@youdontknowxpand o More manned fighter missions, HOWEVER, Consider the Movie STEALTH, and the problem with that system. At any rate, IF that step were to be made by EITHER of the above mentioned nations, WOULD or COULD we be on the verge of the realization of TERMINATOR ? OR ROBOTECH !!! Just a thought
@mesquiteguy121 Machines can't kill humans unless programmed to do so. And even machines that work in battle fields during the war are controled by humans in a bunker. There will not be an inteligent machine with access to weapons. If you take a bit of time to understand how robots are programmed you'll see what I mean. You literally have to tell them everything. So no Terminator nor Robotech will be true unless someone programs the machine to kill humans.
@youdontknowxpand And with that I mean that machines can be overridden. Just "inject" a virus on the machine's software and puff, no more evil robot. You can't believe what you see in hollywood...
@youdontknowxpand Dont misunderstand me, I'm NO Conspirosy theorist. But I BELIEVE The future is wide open to what could and MIGHT happen as far as Robots and mlitary applications are concerned. I'm just suprised that IF things like the Aurora project and the Black Triangle DO exsist, Then why havent they been applied in places like Afghanistan or Iraq. Either way its all wild speculation and conjecture. And I'm just throwing idea and concepts out there just to see what response I get.
@mesquiteguy121 Ah, so that's what all this is about! Lol, this Aurora is not the secret project of the USAF. This is my own plane made for testing tailless flight. The Aurora name just came as sudden inspiration, little did I know 3 years ago that it would cause so much commotion... :|
@youdontknowxpand Funny You JUST HAPPEN to Pick the Name of a CONTROVERSIAL SECRET BLACK PROJECT, That the Govt has been SUPOSSEDLY....NOT, working on for the past 20 ? Years !!! For all I KNOW your actually an M.I.B, MAYBE I should just STOP talking to you. For all I Know it maybe too late, LOL OKAYYY I'm just kidding. But yeah the AURORA, PROJECT, has been the subject of alot of wild talk and speculatin for years. Who knew.
@youdontknowxpand And Thats just my point. IF and When a weapon system is PROGRAMMED to Kill and or destroy roboticlly it could and would change the way warfare is conducted. Its been known that the us military and our Govt is looking into relieving our troops of being in the middle of warfare by being replaced by Robots. The advances Japan is making in Robots and the Advances the US is making in jet technology COULD allow this to happen.
@mesquiteguy121 I'm sure they will implement countermeasures if anything goes wrong. Movies just make humans look like negligent dumbass creatures that can't predict a cause of their actions.
and to answer you I don't judge this plane because it looks like something or whathever . I said it cannot fly because 1 it hasen't enought space for aerodynamic positive lift 2 bcause you're 3d plan is not complete ... it's a complicate artwork :s
... alright let's doin it short . Do the program that you use in the vid integrate an aérodynamic or even a mathematical set up ( software , matrice , whathever ... ) .
A plane with no (srry I'm french lol there's a word for that but you called it "vertical stabilizer") we say "dérives" cannot even match with old-gen aircrafts in maniability . And we can see directly that your plane is made to be seen , not to be in a real warfare .
@llYannouWll1010 The simulator uses a data file with the plane's aerodynamic specs (wing area, dihedral, sweep, incidence, tailplane area, engine power, weight distribution, etc) that I get from the model itself. It doesn't simulate surface/shape drag though.
@aenfeain So you're saying the plane can't create lift? Well, a side cut of the fuselage would show you how the air on the curved top moves faster than on the flat bottom, creating lift, which is the basic principle of lift generation by a wing.
love the concept design on this bird. the name on its just fine the fact that others want to associate a name with other projects is their problem. as for all the comments about religion, bugger off!!, don't we all get enough of that when we walk through the airports or listen to the news where one muslim, jew , hindu, christian, religious fanatic is killing another because they believe in their faith slightly differently.
The Aurora is NOT an experimental airplane. "Aurora" was the code name of the B-2 competition funding assigned by Colonel Buz Carpenter at the Pentagon. The code name of the funding project was leaked to the press and somehow became the unoffical name of a completely NONEXISTENT hypersonic plane. It does NOT exist, people. Let's move on.
@ThatTastesHorrible What!? I'm talking about this plane, which is my own creation! I don't give a damn about if the US have a top secret hypersonic jet or not! I should never have named it Aurora... Damn...
@matuag15 I like the Su-27 too. The problem with this airplane is it's paintscheme. You should see it with the overal grey colors. It looks much much better. I was stupid to make a video with this color...
At a glance, roll well, then a roll and bank would put a lot of stress on the main wing. Expensive materials, crazy onboard computer, maybe it won't fly upside-down. Have you put a model in a wind tunnel? Looks like a lot of drag that could be resolved simply with a delta main wing and a sharper sweep to compensate the loss of roll. Traditionally the downsweep of a wing is used in large load aircraft ya? Maybe a reverse gull wing or a short span cranked arrow. Looks over complicated. Dunno.
@Lightflightpilot Well, this plane is more of a crazy experiment. Kinda like the A-12 or the X-29. I never tested is on a wind tunnel, though. And this flight in the simulator is unrealistic since I had no respect for the plane's G limits... On some I pulled over 12Gs...
@youdontknowxpand Oh, wait! This one doesn't have an inverted V tail... Sorry... That was another one... I haven't taken a look at this plane in a while and thought the tail was angled more than it is.
@moomoo1337 It has a fuel tank in the main fuselage with a capacity for 25 minutes of flight at max throttle. The engines have a very low fuel consumption. But this is one of my oldest planes. I have almost no knowledge of aeronautics back then... And even today, my experimental jets still cause controversy...
@Ccrazyfella I actually never thought too deeply about that. So, I can't state anything. There's no point in having Top Secret projects since the cold war is no more. But on the other hand, we are talking about the USA. A superpower keen in keeping its secrets secret.
@mrmarclaro El avión tiene un propósito de testar vuelos sin deriva... No es hecho para ser esteticamente agradable. La pintura es horrible, pero yo era un novato...
I'll pay you 20 bucks to make an Arkbird, from AC5. Give it a Lear 45 cockpit, or a 747 cockpit I don't care, just make a good flight model and some gear. I'll make some sketches and send them to you, we got a deal? I chose you because you seem to really know what you're doing, especially with fictional aircraft. :D
@youdontknowxpand I saw it, I have it. I'm talking full on payware extremely detailed and effects, such as gear and other stuff. If you haven't figured it out, I am probably the biggest Ace Combat fan ever.
@PSNgregiskool Well, that's a hard thing you're asking because there is no information whatsoever about the akbird's systems. Also FSX has limits so most things aren't possible to make... (realistic lasers and other sfx)
@youdontknowxpand Well, I'm just talking about some higher quality textures, and maybe some better flight dynamics, Lazers are unnecessary. Just make some high quality textures for your old version, I'm talking HIGH quality. Then we'll talk. take it in waves.
Nice design, i like the vertical engine placement.
And as for the Blackbird's top speed, I think it's limited by its engine technology and max thrust. Ramjets are only useful to around Mach 4, I think. Still, who knows. Only the pilots can be sure how fast it went.
@Echo115RS Thanks! I agree, the Blackbird's top speed is limited by, not only engine but also aerodynamics since that at mach 3 the plane becomes glowing red due to drag...
a hypersonic jet cant be fly by humans it can if you controll it tru a remotontrol like a UAV the plane is to fast and reaction would be to slow or u need to take drugs
@youdontknowxpand ? are you so dump the fastest plane today the blackbird goe smag 0.8 most of the tim ethey say 8 because non plane goes hygher than that
@7249xxl No, the Blackbird goes at mach 3... Believe me I have seen lots of specifications of the plane... The fastest plane is actually the X-43 that flyes at mach 7... It was on the news... Please, don't call me dumb... I've been learning about planes for 12 years...
@youdontknowxpand I said the maximum speed of the blackbird it only flew to mach 3 but know one knows if that was just at full throttle or not cause the goverment is hiding it still.
@yoyoyoyoshua Man, I don't know, I have 4 books on flight and airplanes and all say that the top speed is mach 3.2... Mostly because of aerodynamic issues...
i have some awesome designs for FSX military aircraft and as soon as I can get FSDS or GMax(which one is better btw) I am going to start making freeware and payware models of them.
@youdontknowxpand Can you apply textures on the model in gmax or do you have to apply them in a spearate program? also how to you create control surfaces such as rudder movements thrust control etc.?
@7A1R28 Thhe textures MUST be applied in gmax. To create the control surfaces you can resort to making those parts from separate objects or cutting them from the wing using booleans...
It can fly: Real Examples: B-2 Bomber, X-45 and so on...
The tail is only needed to maintain stability in tight turns, but with the fly-by-wire system it's absence is almost unnoticeable. Also this aircraft has all it's surfaces with negative dihedral that almost makes up for the lack of Vertical Stab...
I don't know how... I don't have X-plane and I would never download it... Plus I don't know how to work with blender... so even if I had X-plane I couldn't make this aircraft for it... sorry.
FSX freeware, ,who the fuck cares! get a job and buy real payware aircraft fro fsx!
jimabbey1964 11 hours ago
@jimabbey1964 Yeah, what if I tell you that making this and other freeware got me some job offers for professional 3d modeling? Please think before you talk... Or write, in this case...
youdontknowxpand 10 hours ago
@youdontknowxpand You mean TYPE in this case DUMB ASS!
jimabbey1964 10 hours ago
@jimabbey1964 yeah, pick on the language issues, that's really what a reasonable person does... (in portuguese write and type are the same word, but you wouldn't know that, would you?) In addition to the other comment: Well, I made this and other planes, plus a whole arcade game and a full size, functional electric car. What do you have to show for yourself? I don't buy payware not because I don't have the money, but because I don't need them....
youdontknowxpand 10 hours ago
@youdontknowxpand I use FS for the simulator abilities, not to show that I have the most realistic looking scenery or plane. I just want a software to simulate my designs.
youdontknowxpand 10 hours ago
not enough headroom, hanging wings: difficult to land in crosswind, cool appeareance :.-)
tinolino58 1 week ago
@tinolino58 Last one matters most! xD But yeah, it had a lot of problems. I learned a lot from this plane, actually!
youdontknowxpand 1 week ago
Xpand, I'm in a love/hate relationship with your designs. I love 'em because they're so awesome, and I hate them because you make it look so damn easy!
BlackhoundOne 2 months ago
@BlackhoundOne Thanks! Lol, it gets easier with time, but it takes longer to finish them! xD
youdontknowxpand 2 months ago
Nice animation. Does it have leather seats and a Bose Sound System? If not, fuggedaboudit
peejay1954 3 months ago
@peejay1954 Lol, it's not quite an animation. This is it's actual flying in a simulator. I son't have leather seats but I do have sheepskin seats! ;D
youdontknowxpand 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Greatest SCIENTIFIC Explanation. The SPIRIT Lives! HEAVENLY FATHER HAS APPEARED AND HE WALKS AMONG US. Only the Creator Himself can reveal His vision as His own. All the FUTURE He forwards in his gift to humanity..// watch LA PAROLA IN CUATRO and merge with the greatest pronouncement and the highest science, as He reveals all Creation. Watch and rejoice…this one is Real !! Yes, it is He ! @ La Parola In Cuatro. (He even looks like ZEUS !! )
bortelliM 3 months ago
this concept is good as DRONE...not as a plane
Ruby1994ful 3 months ago
@Ruby1994ful why so? a drone is a small plane...
youdontknowxpand 3 months ago
nice concept
unit666industries 3 months ago
@unit666industries Thank you!
youdontknowxpand 3 months ago
OKAY Folks, The implications here are astounding, IMAGINE a Nation Like the U.S. OR JAPAN building a Full Scale version of this and THEN Placing a HONDA ROBOT in it instead of a Human and u can see where that could go RIGHT ?
mesquiteguy121 3 months ago
@mesquiteguy121 Uhhh.... That would be awesome! At least regarding the plane! :D
youdontknowxpand 3 months ago
@youdontknowxpand o More manned fighter missions, HOWEVER, Consider the Movie STEALTH, and the problem with that system. At any rate, IF that step were to be made by EITHER of the above mentioned nations, WOULD or COULD we be on the verge of the realization of TERMINATOR ? OR ROBOTECH !!! Just a thought
mesquiteguy121 3 months ago
@mesquiteguy121 Machines can't kill humans unless programmed to do so. And even machines that work in battle fields during the war are controled by humans in a bunker. There will not be an inteligent machine with access to weapons. If you take a bit of time to understand how robots are programmed you'll see what I mean. You literally have to tell them everything. So no Terminator nor Robotech will be true unless someone programs the machine to kill humans.
youdontknowxpand 3 months ago
@youdontknowxpand And with that I mean that machines can be overridden. Just "inject" a virus on the machine's software and puff, no more evil robot. You can't believe what you see in hollywood...
youdontknowxpand 3 months ago
@youdontknowxpand Dont misunderstand me, I'm NO Conspirosy theorist. But I BELIEVE The future is wide open to what could and MIGHT happen as far as Robots and mlitary applications are concerned. I'm just suprised that IF things like the Aurora project and the Black Triangle DO exsist, Then why havent they been applied in places like Afghanistan or Iraq. Either way its all wild speculation and conjecture. And I'm just throwing idea and concepts out there just to see what response I get.
mesquiteguy121 3 months ago
@mesquiteguy121 Ah, so that's what all this is about! Lol, this Aurora is not the secret project of the USAF. This is my own plane made for testing tailless flight. The Aurora name just came as sudden inspiration, little did I know 3 years ago that it would cause so much commotion... :|
youdontknowxpand 3 months ago
@youdontknowxpand Funny You JUST HAPPEN to Pick the Name of a CONTROVERSIAL SECRET BLACK PROJECT, That the Govt has been SUPOSSEDLY....NOT, working on for the past 20 ? Years !!! For all I KNOW your actually an M.I.B, MAYBE I should just STOP talking to you. For all I Know it maybe too late, LOL OKAYYY I'm just kidding. But yeah the AURORA, PROJECT, has been the subject of alot of wild talk and speculatin for years. Who knew.
mesquiteguy121 3 months ago
@mesquiteguy121 LOL, yeah...
youdontknowxpand 3 months ago
@mesquiteguy121 M.I.B.? Men In Black?
passwordguy1 3 months ago
@youdontknowxpand And Thats just my point. IF and When a weapon system is PROGRAMMED to Kill and or destroy roboticlly it could and would change the way warfare is conducted. Its been known that the us military and our Govt is looking into relieving our troops of being in the middle of warfare by being replaced by Robots. The advances Japan is making in Robots and the Advances the US is making in jet technology COULD allow this to happen.
mesquiteguy121 3 months ago
@mesquiteguy121 I'm sure they will implement countermeasures if anything goes wrong. Movies just make humans look like negligent dumbass creatures that can't predict a cause of their actions.
youdontknowxpand 3 months ago
very small wing......means it is not maneuverable enough for a dogfight....this might be just like a tomahawk missile kinda way of flying.
onilef65 3 months ago
@onilef65 Yes, but this isn't a fighter jet lol! It's like the X-29, that is, it's a X-plane.
youdontknowxpand 3 months ago
I saw someone at the rc field make a brick fly; your plane looks more aerodynamic than a brick... lol don't listen to these people
seetherage 3 months ago
@seetherage lol, thanks!
youdontknowxpand 3 months ago
and to answer you I don't judge this plane because it looks like something or whathever . I said it cannot fly because 1 it hasen't enought space for aerodynamic positive lift 2 bcause you're 3d plan is not complete ... it's a complicate artwork :s
but good job still
llYannouWll1010 4 months ago
@llYannouWll1010 Ah, ok! That's what I wanted to know! Thanks! :D Well, the lack of vertical stabilizers is the purpose of this plane...
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
@llYannouWll1010 of course it could fly you idiot! would just need a lot of thrust
jonoferguson22 3 months ago
... alright let's doin it short . Do the program that you use in the vid integrate an aérodynamic or even a mathematical set up ( software , matrice , whathever ... ) .
A plane with no (srry I'm french lol there's a word for that but you called it "vertical stabilizer") we say "dérives" cannot even match with old-gen aircrafts in maniability . And we can see directly that your plane is made to be seen , not to be in a real warfare .
llYannouWll1010 4 months ago
@llYannouWll1010 The simulator uses a data file with the plane's aerodynamic specs (wing area, dihedral, sweep, incidence, tailplane area, engine power, weight distribution, etc) that I get from the model itself. It doesn't simulate surface/shape drag though.
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
yeah I totaly agree with you , but it will still not fly lol
llYannouWll1010 4 months ago
@llYannouWll1010 Why not? Why couldn't it fly? Just because it looks unflyable doesn't mean it can't do that. ;)
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
@llYannouWll1010 Besides most modern fighters wouldn't even achieve level flight if it weren't for the on-board computers...
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
haha really cool aircraft , I mean Design cause this jet will never fly in real conditions believe me
llYannouWll1010 4 months ago
@llYannouWll1010 Thanks! Yeah, it would probably never fly, but there are many weird aircraft that seemed that they would never fly and they flew...
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
Cool design but is it aerodynamic enough to fly? Cool name aswel!
garythefeek 4 months ago
@garythefeek Thanks! The plane doesn't create too much drag. I reckon it would fly. It would be really unstable, but it would fly...
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
@youdontknowxpand
IMHO lack of aerodynamic lift
aenfeain 4 months ago
@aenfeain So you're saying the plane can't create lift? Well, a side cut of the fuselage would show you how the air on the curved top moves faster than on the flat bottom, creating lift, which is the basic principle of lift generation by a wing.
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
@youdontknowxpand
i did not write it cant fly;]
aenfeain 4 months ago
love the concept design on this bird. the name on its just fine the fact that others want to associate a name with other projects is their problem. as for all the comments about religion, bugger off!!, don't we all get enough of that when we walk through the airports or listen to the news where one muslim, jew , hindu, christian, religious fanatic is killing another because they believe in their faith slightly differently.
1ordequis 4 months ago
@1ordequis Thanks a lot! Gonna give a thumbs up to this! :)
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
Bad Ass Creation! Very nice!
greed2112 4 months ago
@greed2112 Thanks a lot man! I'll probably remake it because my modeling skills didn't make justice to the concept drawings of this plane...
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
The Aurora is NOT an experimental airplane. "Aurora" was the code name of the B-2 competition funding assigned by Colonel Buz Carpenter at the Pentagon. The code name of the funding project was leaked to the press and somehow became the unoffical name of a completely NONEXISTENT hypersonic plane. It does NOT exist, people. Let's move on.
ThatTastesHorrible 4 months ago
@ThatTastesHorrible What!? I'm talking about this plane, which is my own creation! I don't give a damn about if the US have a top secret hypersonic jet or not! I should never have named it Aurora... Damn...
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
the bible talks about aircraft that would look like insects in Revelations or the book of John
Makiba08 4 months ago
song is from Wipeout hd
Cyan1902 4 months ago
@Cyan1902 true, though it's on pulse too.
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
It Looks Ugly,I think the most beautiful aircrafts till date are F-18C Hornets & Su-27 Flankers
matuag15 4 months ago
@matuag15 I like the Su-27 too. The problem with this airplane is it's paintscheme. You should see it with the overal grey colors. It looks much much better. I was stupid to make a video with this color...
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
At a glance, roll well, then a roll and bank would put a lot of stress on the main wing. Expensive materials, crazy onboard computer, maybe it won't fly upside-down. Have you put a model in a wind tunnel? Looks like a lot of drag that could be resolved simply with a delta main wing and a sharper sweep to compensate the loss of roll. Traditionally the downsweep of a wing is used in large load aircraft ya? Maybe a reverse gull wing or a short span cranked arrow. Looks over complicated. Dunno.
Lightflightpilot 4 months ago
@Lightflightpilot Well, this plane is more of a crazy experiment. Kinda like the A-12 or the X-29. I never tested is on a wind tunnel, though. And this flight in the simulator is unrealistic since I had no respect for the plane's G limits... On some I pulled over 12Gs...
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
can i ask what the bennifet of wings sloped downwards or is it just a design, i know swept back wing design improves speed but why angled down?
goldenkro 4 months ago
@goldenkro The main wing negative dihedral enables fast rolling speed and the downward angled tail works like a V-tail, only downwards.
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
@youdontknowxpand
Ah, nope, there are 2 reasons to use them:
1- to correct effed up roll rates/controls (like in the F-4 Phantom, where the only "clean" air was down low")
2 - to control /take advantage of the "free" lift during SS flight (the XB-70 and Concorde both had drooped wings for this
Otherwise, in subsonic, they are fixed drag with reduced lift, which is not efficient.
There's a reason none of the recent fighter designsactual planes use droooped wings. It don't work.
shootingnerd 4 months ago
@shootingnerd Then why do they use it on the Dassault/Dornier Alpha Jet? And, what about the Predator UAV?
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
@youdontknowxpand Oh, wait! This one doesn't have an inverted V tail... Sorry... That was another one... I haven't taken a look at this plane in a while and thought the tail was angled more than it is.
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
@youdontknowxpand kool thanks for the response
goldenkro 4 months ago
@youdontknowxpand V tail is called butterfly tail because its so pretty.....
Zenthos01 4 months ago
No TR3B, except in my channel... that one flies! Otherwise, a toal fiction.
doceigen 4 months ago
Does it not need Fuel tanks?
moomoo1337 5 months ago
@moomoo1337 It has a fuel tank in the main fuselage with a capacity for 25 minutes of flight at max throttle. The engines have a very low fuel consumption. But this is one of my oldest planes. I have almost no knowledge of aeronautics back then... And even today, my experimental jets still cause controversy...
youdontknowxpand 5 months ago
@youdontknowxpand - What are your opinions on the T3RB flyng triangle?
Just a rumor?
Ccrazyfella 4 months ago
@Ccrazyfella I actually never thought too deeply about that. So, I can't state anything. There's no point in having Top Secret projects since the cold war is no more. But on the other hand, we are talking about the USA. A superpower keen in keeping its secrets secret.
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
@youdontknowxpand About it being an extraterrestrial UFO. That's unlikely. They would have more advanced disguise technology.
youdontknowxpand 4 months ago
Would never fly... to damn ugly
viper8red 5 months ago
@viper8red Sure, why not...
youdontknowxpand 5 months ago
parece un sea harrier siglo 21 sin deriva.muy lindo pero para un videogame.Esteticamente no dice mucho.
mrmarclaro 5 months ago
@mrmarclaro El avión tiene un propósito de testar vuelos sin deriva... No es hecho para ser esteticamente agradable. La pintura es horrible, pero yo era un novato...
youdontknowxpand 5 months ago
Looks like something from ace combat...
platinum243125 5 months ago
@platinum243125 I guess... Maybe because Ace combat 3 has a big influence in my early sleek designs...
youdontknowxpand 5 months ago
thats in saints row the third
nissanferrari1 6 months ago
i like M.I.S.T. - outerspace alot
kcksd10 6 months ago
thums up but only for the jungle muzic
kcksd10 6 months ago
what song is that... thanks
PotholesInMyLawn 11 months ago
@PotholesInMyLawn Mist - Smart systems (I put the name in the discription)
youdontknowxpand 11 months ago
@youdontknowxpand Thanks... I did not extend the show more... sorry about that... thanks for the reply
PotholesInMyLawn 10 months ago
@youdontknowxpand oh yeah that song from WipEout HD :L
by the way do you have that game? o3o
RDD756 7 months ago
@RDD756 If I have the game!? I'm crazy about the Wipeout series, I've been playing Wipeout since Wipeout 3, in 1999. :D
youdontknowxpand 7 months ago
@youdontknowxpand coo whats your PSN? maybe we can play WipEout sometime :L
RDD756 7 months ago
@RDD756 Xpand122, add as friend!
youdontknowxpand 7 months ago
@youdontknowxpand okay i sent
RDD756 7 months ago
@youdontknowxpand You play WipEout HD Fury too!? ADD MEEEEE
Xx3P1CxY0SH1xX
(Smart Systems is like... My favourite song of all time!)
yoshifan277 6 months ago
I'll pay you 20 bucks to make an Arkbird, from AC5. Give it a Lear 45 cockpit, or a 747 cockpit I don't care, just make a good flight model and some gear. I'll make some sketches and send them to you, we got a deal? I chose you because you seem to really know what you're doing, especially with fictional aircraft. :D
PSNgregiskool 1 year ago
@PSNgregiskool Ahah, already done! Check my channel and open the White Bird video...
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
@youdontknowxpand I saw it, I have it. I'm talking full on payware extremely detailed and effects, such as gear and other stuff. If you haven't figured it out, I am probably the biggest Ace Combat fan ever.
PSNgregiskool 1 year ago
@PSNgregiskool Well, that's a hard thing you're asking because there is no information whatsoever about the akbird's systems. Also FSX has limits so most things aren't possible to make... (realistic lasers and other sfx)
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
@youdontknowxpand Even the AC5 Arkbird model itself had slightly less details than the one that I did...
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
@youdontknowxpand Well, I'm just talking about some higher quality textures, and maybe some better flight dynamics, Lazers are unnecessary. Just make some high quality textures for your old version, I'm talking HIGH quality. Then we'll talk. take it in waves.
PSNgregiskool 1 year ago
@PSNgregiskool Well, when I have the time, I'll redesign the new one...
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
H9ow do you build it? I want to do this, but how do you do it? what programs do I need?
PSNgregiskool 1 year ago
@PSNgregiskool gmax, photoshop and FSX + FSX SDK and a lot of 3D modeling and texturing experience.
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
So slick!!!! Never heard of that software......I use Vellum since I'm on the Mac. Still could never accomplish what you have.
You must be a "kid" to be THAT good, ha ha ha. I'm a child of the 60s, myself.
Carry on!
Steve
toysbyus1 1 year ago
@toysbyus1 Thanks! I'm 17, not quite a full grow adult either! I've been making planes since I was 10 and making them in 3D since 12...
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
Did you design and "build" this? If so, SWEET job. May i ask what application you used?
Very nice design. I used to design GI Joe vehicles for Hasbro in the 1980s and designed the Cobra Raven..........
Really nice!!
Steve
toysbyus1 1 year ago
@toysbyus1 Thanks! I did design it and built it in 3D. I used gmax, which is a downgraded freeware version of 3ds max 5.
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
Nice design, i like the vertical engine placement.
And as for the Blackbird's top speed, I think it's limited by its engine technology and max thrust. Ramjets are only useful to around Mach 4, I think. Still, who knows. Only the pilots can be sure how fast it went.
Echo115RS 1 year ago
@Echo115RS Thanks! I agree, the Blackbird's top speed is limited by, not only engine but also aerodynamics since that at mach 3 the plane becomes glowing red due to drag...
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
a hypersonic jet cant be fly by humans it can if you controll it tru a remotontrol like a UAV the plane is to fast and reaction would be to slow or u need to take drugs
7249xxl 1 year ago
@7249xxl True, but, where does it say that this plane is hypersonic? It hardly reaches mach 1.2!
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
@youdontknowxpand ? are you so dump the fastest plane today the blackbird goe smag 0.8 most of the tim ethey say 8 because non plane goes hygher than that
7249xxl 1 year ago
@7249xxl No, the Blackbird goes at mach 3... Believe me I have seen lots of specifications of the plane... The fastest plane is actually the X-43 that flyes at mach 7... It was on the news... Please, don't call me dumb... I've been learning about planes for 12 years...
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
@youdontknowxpand dude the speed of the blackbird is unknown.
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
@yoyoyoyoshua How is it unknown? The plane is real, it flew and it's top speed is mach 3.2. Look it up...
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
@youdontknowxpand I said the maximum speed of the blackbird it only flew to mach 3 but know one knows if that was just at full throttle or not cause the goverment is hiding it still.
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
@yoyoyoyoshua Man, I don't know, I have 4 books on flight and airplanes and all say that the top speed is mach 3.2... Mostly because of aerodynamic issues...
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
@youdontknowxpand that just what they say but really it can go faster
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
@yoyoyoyoshua Ok... We'll have to wait to see if they'll unveil all the truth...
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
@youdontknowxpand yeah hopefully it will be soon but I think that if they do it won't be for a long time.
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
@youdontknowxpand the aurora is ment to go hypersonic
yoyoyoyoshua 1 year ago
@yoyoyoyoshua Wait what? This is not the secret aurora... It's a design made by me...
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
i have some awesome designs for FSX military aircraft and as soon as I can get FSDS or GMax(which one is better btw) I am going to start making freeware and payware models of them.
7A1R28 1 year ago
@7A1R28 Cool, can't wait to see them! Gmax is the most versatile, but FSDS is easier to export... My personal advice is using gmax...
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
@youdontknowxpand Can you apply textures on the model in gmax or do you have to apply them in a spearate program? also how to you create control surfaces such as rudder movements thrust control etc.?
7A1R28 1 year ago
@7A1R28 Thhe textures MUST be applied in gmax. To create the control surfaces you can resort to making those parts from separate objects or cutting them from the wing using booleans...
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
@youdontknowxpand also to animate them you must read the instructions on the FSX SDK.
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
what program did you use to make this? I have several planes that I could put in here
dmans7707 1 year ago
@dmans7707 Gmax: 3D Cad sofware, it's free... The FS2004 SDK, also free and FSX to fly the planes....
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
Dude , stop making virtual planes. REAL AVIATION WORLDS NEEDS DESIGNERS LIKE YOU!
spanish111japan 1 year ago
lol, thank you!
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
Thanks!
youdontknowxpand 1 year ago
wheres the tail thingy... i dont think it cant fly witout a tail
sexking83 2 years ago
It can fly: Real Examples: B-2 Bomber, X-45 and so on...
The tail is only needed to maintain stability in tight turns, but with the fly-by-wire system it's absence is almost unnoticeable. Also this aircraft has all it's surfaces with negative dihedral that almost makes up for the lack of Vertical Stab...
youdontknowxpand 2 years ago 2
have you never seen a b-2?
quinnvz 2 years ago
the b2 is wedged shaped?
sexking83 2 years ago
yes
quinnvz 2 years ago
i ques you know some things about gmax but can you animate things in gmax? becose i just started gmax but i used metasequoia
themrdutchdevil 2 years ago
well, we'll handle that with pm's...
youdontknowxpand 2 years ago
is this gmax?
themrdutchdevil 2 years ago
The plane is made on gmax the video was made on Flight Simulator X.
youdontknowxpand 2 years ago
Awesome!!
AugmentedB737 2 years ago
Thanks!
youdontknowxpand 2 years ago
it look like it will be a great rc airplane its so fucken cool
S0M0NE45 2 years ago
Thanks!
youdontknowxpand 2 years ago
wow, nice airplane!
can you give me the file please?
and did you upload this to any website?
if you want i can upload it to my website for you
Fire1hp 2 years ago
You need to read the description. there's a link to the plane and the update. Thanks!
youdontknowxpand 2 years ago
wait! Sorry no link, go to simviation...
youdontknowxpand 2 years ago
Good job, good plane!
Congratulation!
choun18 2 years ago
thanks!
youdontknowxpand 2 years ago
another great model, good work!
mathcaou11 2 years ago
Thanks!!
youdontknowxpand 2 years ago
Awesome! I love it! When can I download it?
discoverysgraywolf 2 years ago
Well, I don't know maybe soon.... thanks.
youdontknowxpand 2 years ago
Model it in X-plane.
trenchXspike 2 years ago
I don't know how... I don't have X-plane and I would never download it... Plus I don't know how to work with blender... so even if I had X-plane I couldn't make this aircraft for it... sorry.
Thanks for the comment.
youdontknowxpand 2 years ago