It's not real, just an example of what would happen if gays married under current law. This video is a direct challenge to those who say homosexuals have the same rights -- to marry to the opposite sex.
Ohhh. I see. Thanks for clearing that up :) great vid btw. The one thing some bigots think is that civil unions = marriage and gays already have the same rights and are just fighting for the word marriage. Might want to add that on the next one
Sí, estamos bien, pero me pregunto cómo vamos a continuar la historia. Quiero decir, él introdujo bearmon y todavía no sé qué trama mal que conejo monstruo contra el hermano de Gabumon. Eso y las escenas de sexo van a ser raro entre Guilmon, Agumon y Gabumon.
me tienes confundido eres dj kat el de rule 34? y para tu pregunta si ya vi la pagina y no no ha subido nada exepto un par de dibujillos y tambien puso un concurso para que alguien termine el shigabumon pero nadie lo ha hecho yo tngo ideas para terminarlo pero soy un poco malo dibujando de una calificacion entre el 1 y el 10 tengo 6.5
Sí, estoy DJKat de la regla 34, lol. X_x Quería terminar el cómic, pero en realidad quiero kumachan para hacerlo! Puedo dibujar, pero no se siente lo mismo. D: Tal vez, ambos deberían tratar de terminarlo?
bueno amigo me voy porque en mi pais ya son la 24:34 pm perdon por confundirte con djkat igual y me hubiera gustaria tenerte como amigo en mi messeger lastima que no tienes bueno chao
bueno te encontre porque hay alguien que se llama djkat y el subio los ultimos capitulos de el comic shigabumon de kumachan je je pues si tu no eres el pues una equivocacion hace amigos no
I am of costarica and have 15 years X3 you were asking yourself that I do in bum 34 well since already you know not and in addition I am specializing myself in PCs already me harme one p4 me gustaria to take yourself as a friend in my messenger
To the shit if they want they fight to blows it(he,she) hears that it(he,she) hurts that kumachan stop raising the comics of digimon that hurts I the want to see all
y pos a la mierda si queres se agarran a pichasos oye que lastima que kumachan dejo de subir los comics de digimon que lastima yo los queria ver todos
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
If they were loving why would they adopt this poor boy, deny him a real father and drag him into a world of confusion and trauma?
Again you keep trying to defend these two for being selfish and irresponsible. Had they kept out of his life he would probably have been adopted by a normal couple and spared all this drama
Or if same-sex marriage was legal, this never would've happened.
I'm not going to argue opinion with you, though, garysher3. That gets us no where.For example: It is selfish and irresponsible to dissolve families like you suggested, it is traumatizing and confusing to separate a child who's been with their mothers for 5 years at a whim.
Had you kept out of their life, Donny could've grown up in a loving, stable non-traditional family.
I never said, claimed, or hinted this was out of spite -- it is their only option if they want legal equality, to receive the benefits of marriage, and raise Donny at no disadvantage.
Rachel and Ellen took Donny out of an orphanage -- I do believe that shows concern for both his plight and interest.
Why is it the only option? How about staying single and not adopting i.e. putting the interests of the child above the immature brattishness of these two lesbos?
That is the only option if they want to get married and have an advantage while supporting the child. I have to be THAT specific with you, don't I?
Instead of giving them marriage, you now suggest that they remain single and abandon Donny.
Once again, you prove how they are unequal and in the process, destroyed a family. In a child custody sense, the "Interest of the child" are met by this couple.
You're arguing your opinion at this point. You call them BRATTY; real people call them loving.
There is nothing in this video claiming or hinting that Rachel and Ellen could not provide a proper family.
It was your argument that they would be treated Equally Under the Law and that they could get married.
This is the only way, unless you were lying from the start.
That is where the blame lies, garysher3, read the title of this video. It is people like you who make these arguments, but when they fail, put the blame on someone else.
Kat:Getting married is what's best for the child, both financially and legally.......From this point forward, you'll argue that a mom and dad are best for the child without any legitimate evidence
Which is it?
Why didn't these two lesbos think things through before adopting this poor child?
How typical of you to blame someone else for the mistakes and sheer lying hypocrisy of these tow lesbos. Why won't they take responsibility for their own actions?
It's clear they put their own selfish interests way ahead of what's best for the child
What hypocrisy, mistakes, lies, and acts of not taking responsibility? Please explain that.
Getting married is what's best for the child, both financially and legally. You cannot tell me those benefits for marriage aren't intended aid the family.
If raising Donny, with all of the basic advantages every married American citizen enjoys, is selfish then I your judgment.
From this point forward, you'll argue that a mom and dad are best for the child without any legitimate evidence.
It was you who argued homosexuals are treated equally under the law - it is not an excuse, but a demonstration of how they are not - that's why your name is in the tags.
We have applied this situation to reality and it worked out horribly. Homosexuals simply want to marry each other and raise their kids, but with opposition, like yours, this is impossible.
If you truly cared about the kids, you would legalize same-sex marriage or ban gay adoption / artificial reproduction.
Of course, you don't care about them, and constantly hide behind the tactics of "What about the children" to further your own political ideas.
That is both hypocritical and disgusting.
No one wants to live, or marry, this way, but with people like you denying them this freedom it's this or nothing. Both put the family at a disadvantage.
Note: No children were harmed in the making of this film.
Why does our government even encourage marriage with tax benefits, etc.?
Maybe because spouses have the power to support each other in good times and bad and to provide for each other after the death of one. That means the rest of society benefits because individuals are taken care of and are more stable.
Why would anyone want to deny access to this this stabilizing institution to any citizen?
isnt aprenup and a will gonna take care of this?
PLISKEN12 2 years ago
Nope, still doesn't cover all the benefits of marriage.
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
This story is very sad, but why the hell did those two marry ass hole men?
ooMONKEYoo 2 years ago
It's not real, just an example of what would happen if gays married under current law. This video is a direct challenge to those who say homosexuals have the same rights -- to marry to the opposite sex.
It's just not true.
Besides, Robert is the asshole, not Dylan. :P
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
Ohhh. I see. Thanks for clearing that up :) great vid btw. The one thing some bigots think is that civil unions = marriage and gays already have the same rights and are just fighting for the word marriage. Might want to add that on the next one
xoxo have a nice day
ooMONKEYoo 2 years ago
This is very sad and should never happen.
Equality is an American Value.
theknowbody 2 years ago
Holy crap. Is my computer broken? Why is everybody talking in spanish?
jkbtw
egeswender 2 years ago
hola tengo 5 bosetos y tu
kigadramon 2 years ago
diay mas o menos pero vale la pena no logicamente hacemos unos bosetos a mano y que la fuerza nos aconpañe. luke
kigadramon 2 years ago
bueno si kumachan me pasa los datos vemos como sino tu y yo lo acemos y estoy viendo como controlar el ms paint XDDDDDDDDD
kigadramon 2 years ago
Huy, MS Paint será difícil! O.O
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
si cuando me las pase te aviso O.K
kigadramon 2 years ago
Sí, estamos bien, pero me pregunto cómo vamos a continuar la historia. Quiero decir, él introdujo bearmon y todavía no sé qué trama mal que conejo monstruo contra el hermano de Gabumon. Eso y las escenas de sexo van a ser raro entre Guilmon, Agumon y Gabumon.
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
si estoy vien si kumachan me pasa las 2 ultimas paginas del comic para empesar X3
kigadramon 2 years ago
Bueno, eso suena como algo que podía intentarlo. : 3
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
dises terminarlo el y yo o tu y yo
kigadramon 2 years ago
Tú ... creo que ambos deben hacerlo juntos o hacer nuestros propios finales? : O
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
me tienes confundido eres dj kat el de rule 34? y para tu pregunta si ya vi la pagina y no no ha subido nada exepto un par de dibujillos y tambien puso un concurso para que alguien termine el shigabumon pero nadie lo ha hecho yo tngo ideas para terminarlo pero soy un poco malo dibujando de una calificacion entre el 1 y el 10 tengo 6.5
kigadramon 2 years ago
Sí, estoy DJKat de la regla 34, lol. X_x Quería terminar el cómic, pero en realidad quiero kumachan para hacerlo! Puedo dibujar, pero no se siente lo mismo. D: Tal vez, ambos deberían tratar de terminarlo?
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
bueno amigo me voy porque en mi pais ya son la 24:34 pm perdon por confundirte con djkat igual y me hubiera gustaria tenerte como amigo en mi messeger lastima que no tienes bueno chao
kigadramon 2 years ago
gracias, benos noches!
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
bueno te encontre porque hay alguien que se llama djkat y el subio los ultimos capitulos de el comic shigabumon de kumachan je je pues si tu no eres el pues una equivocacion hace amigos no
kigadramon 2 years ago
Bueno, no sé kumachan, pero me ha subido sus comics, sí. Me pregunto si kumachan hecho más cómics. ¿Has mirado su página web?
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
bueno estonses que tienes para chatear porque en rule 34 nesesitas algo o no?
kigadramon 2 years ago
es dificil chatear porque traductor pero nunca estado a rule 34? o_O
Cómo me encontraste
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
quiero saber que tines porque chatear en youtube nose esta raro
kigadramon 2 years ago
Ok pero si no tienes msn y yahho entonses que. a y cuantos años tienes tu
kigadramon 2 years ago
tengo diez y nueve anos, viente 14 de octubre. :P
me siento viejo!
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
que es Paheal
kigadramon 2 years ago
Paheal = Rule 34 ....sabes estoyloco o MRFURRY?
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
Shit I me shit in the translator of google it is a shit
kigadramon 2 years ago
I am of costarica and have 15 years X3 you were asking yourself that I do in bum 34 well since already you know not and in addition I am specializing myself in PCs already me harme one p4 me gustaria to take yourself as a friend in my messenger
kigadramon 2 years ago
It's fine, it's nothing, if you need to write in spanish. I have studied spanish for 3 years in high school, so I'll try to remember XD
So you're 15 years old, live in costarica, and specialize in PCs? Lol, better than me! o_O
I also sent you a friend request on youtube, but I don't have MSN Messenger or Yahoo. D:
Hope the translator doesn't turn this into shit. DX
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
si mi ingles tambien es malo
una pregunta tu eres gay? no me malinterpretes nada mas quiero saber.
If my English also is bad a question your are you gay? Me do not misinterpret anything mas I want to know
kigadramon 2 years ago
Lol, soy bisexual.
Are you from Paheal? :O
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
To the shit if they want they fight to blows it(he,she) hears that it(he,she) hurts that kumachan stop raising the comics of digimon that hurts I the want to see all
kigadramon 2 years ago
y pos a la mierda si queres se agarran a pichasos oye que lastima que kumachan dejo de subir los comics de digimon que lastima yo los queria ver todos
kigadramon 2 years ago
me siento, mi espanol es muy malo...
no soy kumachan pero me encanta los comics tambien!
I'm sorry, my spanish is horrible!
I'm not kumachan, but I LOVE his comics too!
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
If they were loving why would they adopt this poor boy, deny him a real father and drag him into a world of confusion and trauma?
Again you keep trying to defend these two for being selfish and irresponsible. Had they kept out of his life he would probably have been adopted by a normal couple and spared all this drama
garysher3 2 years ago
Or if same-sex marriage was legal, this never would've happened.
I'm not going to argue opinion with you, though, garysher3. That gets us no where.For example: It is selfish and irresponsible to dissolve families like you suggested, it is traumatizing and confusing to separate a child who's been with their mothers for 5 years at a whim.
Had you kept out of their life, Donny could've grown up in a loving, stable non-traditional family.
....Like Barack Obama.....
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
So you're saying these two lesbos married men out of spite and childishness! What a stupid argument!
Why didn't they think about this poor boy before they adopted him? Why do you ignore his sad plight?
garysher3 2 years ago
I never said, claimed, or hinted this was out of spite -- it is their only option if they want legal equality, to receive the benefits of marriage, and raise Donny at no disadvantage.
Rachel and Ellen took Donny out of an orphanage -- I do believe that shows concern for both his plight and interest.
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
And how does marrying two guys "further their commitment"?? Were they just golddigging?
Your video makes no sense whatsoever
garysher3 2 years ago
Read the description. It's the only option you give the, garysher3, when you ban same-sex marriage.
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
Why is it the only option? How about staying single and not adopting i.e. putting the interests of the child above the immature brattishness of these two lesbos?
garysher3 2 years ago
That is the only option if they want to get married and have an advantage while supporting the child. I have to be THAT specific with you, don't I?
Instead of giving them marriage, you now suggest that they remain single and abandon Donny.
Once again, you prove how they are unequal and in the process, destroyed a family. In a child custody sense, the "Interest of the child" are met by this couple.
You're arguing your opinion at this point. You call them BRATTY; real people call them loving.
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
I'm not hurting any families. It was the decision of those lesbos to adopt a child, knowing they couldn't provide a proper family.
And it was their decision to enter into these meaningless marriages.
Why can't they accept responsibility for their own stupid decisions? And why do you want to blame everyone else for their mistakes?
garysher3 2 years ago
There is nothing in this video claiming or hinting that Rachel and Ellen could not provide a proper family.
It was your argument that they would be treated Equally Under the Law and that they could get married.
This is the only way, unless you were lying from the start.
That is where the blame lies, garysher3, read the title of this video. It is people like you who make these arguments, but when they fail, put the blame on someone else.
You're the one banning same-sex marriage.
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
Kat:Getting married is what's best for the child, both financially and legally.......From this point forward, you'll argue that a mom and dad are best for the child without any legitimate evidence
Which is it?
Why didn't these two lesbos think things through before adopting this poor child?
garysher3 2 years ago
I know your talking points, garysher3. Regardless of who the parents are, marriage is beneficial, an advantage for the family.
That is a fact.
In response to that, you will always argue that a mother and father are what's best for a child.
This is an opinion.
Regardless of that, you're still adamant on hurting these families, who already have children and cannot get married.
This is where application meets reality.
Some food for thought, garysher3.
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
Also, there is no "Which is it" as an answer.
With both heterosexual and homosexual families, marriage plays an important, key role in supporting them.
Rachel and Ellen could not control the outcome of this situation, no matter how much they "thought things through".
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
How typical of you to blame someone else for the mistakes and sheer lying hypocrisy of these tow lesbos. Why won't they take responsibility for their own actions?
It's clear they put their own selfish interests way ahead of what's best for the child
garysher3 2 years ago
What hypocrisy, mistakes, lies, and acts of not taking responsibility? Please explain that.
Getting married is what's best for the child, both financially and legally. You cannot tell me those benefits for marriage aren't intended aid the family.
If raising Donny, with all of the basic advantages every married American citizen enjoys, is selfish then I your judgment.
From this point forward, you'll argue that a mom and dad are best for the child without any legitimate evidence.
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
What kind of excuse is that? They can't marry their lesbo gal pal so they marry a guy instead, even though they don't love him?
Why do you homosexuals want to live such lies? And what about the poor children, pawns in a battle of political correctness?
If the lesbos really cared about them they wouldn't drag them through such trauma and stigma
garysher3 2 years ago
It was you who argued homosexuals are treated equally under the law - it is not an excuse, but a demonstration of how they are not - that's why your name is in the tags.
We have applied this situation to reality and it worked out horribly. Homosexuals simply want to marry each other and raise their kids, but with opposition, like yours, this is impossible.
If you truly cared about the kids, you would legalize same-sex marriage or ban gay adoption / artificial reproduction.
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
Of course, you don't care about them, and constantly hide behind the tactics of "What about the children" to further your own political ideas.
That is both hypocritical and disgusting.
No one wants to live, or marry, this way, but with people like you denying them this freedom it's this or nothing. Both put the family at a disadvantage.
Note: No children were harmed in the making of this film.
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
So why did these crazy lesbos get married to men they didn't love?
Yet another example of homosexuals living a lie
garysher3 2 years ago
Because they don't have the right to marry those they do love, attaining equal benefits, to raise Donny and support each other.
Of course, they ONLY have the right to marry the opposite sex, to gain these advantages, so they have to go with what they have.
This is your argument, after all garysher3; unless you realize that it, in itself, is a lie.
DJKatAnimated 2 years ago
Excellent points in this video. 5 stars!
Why does our government even encourage marriage with tax benefits, etc.?
Maybe because spouses have the power to support each other in good times and bad and to provide for each other after the death of one. That means the rest of society benefits because individuals are taken care of and are more stable.
Why would anyone want to deny access to this this stabilizing institution to any citizen?
mike2jb 2 years ago 4