As a black belt in Karate i'd like to add the point that the drawer of your life can hold many things, but it is allways on rails.... only the shelf is truly free.
The alphabet was made be listining to all the sounds people make the most often. The order is a random thing. Yes there is a speed of light it's called lightspeed. There is no speed of dark because dark can't move. Light moves darkness doesn't. You have succeeded at failing. Anymore questions, I love answering them.
There is even a bigger question about Adam and Eve that people have argued about for ages - did they have navels? They weren't born so they wouldn't have needed umbilical cords. But isn't it in humans' genetic makeup to have them?
@iMacOSXSnowLeopard But it's not the same. "Don't" has "do" in it, and "haven't" has "have" in it. But "won't" doesn't have "will" in it - it has "wo," which doesn't make sense. But nobody says "willn't."
@ishassinger23 The correct phrase is "I couldn't care less". You need to realise that the majority of the population have no idea what they are actually saying. They know how to say it, but they do not know why they are saying it.
@ishassinger23 Educated people say "I couldn't care less." because that is correct. It is WRONG to say "I could care less." if you are trying to say that it doesn't matter at all to you.
@HannahOnAir The contracted version of "Would not" is wouldn't. Won't has never meant "Would not". Contractions are informal words only used in modern language.
If you're completely immersed in water, are you really wet? Because, technichally, you're not wet until the water clings to you and everything around you is dry. So you're not really wet yet, right?
@waytogo246 Just because it is in nature doesn't mean that it is a primary colour. Green is made up of the pigments blue and yellow. We see purple and pink everywhere in nature also, but they are not primary colours.
@waytogo246 because the primary colours are those colours you can't get by mixing. If you mix blue and yellow you get green. But you cannot mix two colours to get red or yellow or blue. However the four of them are the basic colour. So you first have the primary colours (red, blue and yellow) then the basic colours (res, green, blue and yellow) and then the common colours (red, green, black?, blue, purple, grey, brown, pink, orange, yellow & white). BTW all the common colours are found in nature
what came first the chicken or the egg?? My teacher was talking about philosphy and he said this is one of the questions so i've been wondering and who decided after cow milk to milk a goat??
@goatheads369 No he didn't. And you have just contradicted yourself. If god did create all things, than he would have created the chicken first, and then the rooster.
@monkeytoenails123 The chicken, whether your religious or you follow the sane way of evolution. In both versions the chicken had to come first. I've you believe in any kind of creation story then you believe something something god created all the animals and therefore the chicken, that first chicken laid an egg. So it was first the chicken, however evolution tells is that over the course of centuries slowly live has developed, meaning there first was another creature akin to the chicken and
slowly over time it evolved and evolved and finnally became what is now known to be a chicken. The same goes for all life, it all evolved from one kind into another.
@Talkemist Ah, but if you subscribe to the theory of evolution, a creature that is /almost/ a chicken laid an egg, which hatched into a chicken. I consider that egg to have been a chicken egg, as it contained a chicken.
Why do sleeping pill bottles have warning labels saying "May cause drowsiness" when that's exactly what they're intended to do. Oh and another one. Why do some matresses have "Do not swallow" warnings? Yea, cause I'm definitely gonna try to swallow a damn matress..
@masterofpuppets22495 the first second he sais it, nothing will happen because up untill that moment he isn't lying, but as soon as the fairytail mechanics have figured out he is lying it will grow. After which it will shrink again because he at that point isn't lying anymore.
I understand getting meat from animals, but what possessed people to drink milk? Like "Hmm, this just came out of a cow. I think I'll drink it." Really?? Why would you do that?
@flowerfades Also, what was the guy who discovered cow milk doing? Did he just think "Oh, I think I'll pull on these dangly things and see what happens..."
@unforgettable789 Towels become damp which is a perfect environment for bacteria to start growing. Therefore your towels are now full of fuck. So wash them
@Wittgensteinism A philosophical question is just a question about something nobody thinks about or everyone thinks is normal. The question about the nipples fits that perfectly.
So i guess all of Western Philosophical literature can't be deemed "philosophy" because it's ideas that have already been thought about huh?
or "everyone thinks is normal"?? Well, then i guess you've proved me right yet again; this video doesn't address a question about something everyone thinks is normal. The question of nipples is simply misguided; the most accurate description about philosophical inquiry can be levered.
@Wittgensteinism These are philosophical questions, who decides what is a philosophic question and what is not? The nipples question, could be asked like this, for a philosophic question, since modern science follows the female genome, and the creation story in the bible contradicts this, can one take the bible literally? Also if you try and get all Wittgensteinian, and say there are no valid philosophic questions, Wittgenstein came to change his views in the P.I., because if you think about
@Wittgensteinism Two sources my professor who taught the Wittgenstein class said they are two different philosophies in the Tractatus and P.I., and the opening sentence in the section on P.I. in Wikipedia says the same thing. Wittgenstein is famous for completely changing his viewpoint on philosophy in his life. Not too be rude, but that is common knowledge, so read more Wittgenstein. Also of course it can be asked, he just thought it was a waste of time to ask, because you can't answer it.
@natedaug1 "Wittgenstein is famous for completely changing his viewpoint on philosophy in his life"
Wow. A simple sentence like that shows me how little you understand Wittgenstein. Your professor is right that Wittgenstein produced two entirely different philosophical methods of descerning philosophical propositions, but Your ill-worded statement that he "changed his mind" is not. He changed his method but his conclusions about philosophy remianed the same. I think that they're complimentary
@natedaug1 Good job Wikipediaing the P.I. but maybe you should try reading it.
Which, by the way, for anyone to speak so candidly certain about the meaning and thesis of either the Tractatus and/or the P.I., i think shows again how little you've actually read of him. Understanding philosophical points that Wittgenstein makes is only half of the battle. The other half is interpreting Wittgenstein, which makes his method so uniquely open and illustrative. Wittgenstein DOES more than he SAYS
@natedaug1 So you're saying that a question CAN be asked and yet there is no answer?
Do you understand that this would be the Holy Grail of philosophy for Wittgenstein?
You're obviously confused about what he meant. Yes a question can be asked as in "I said a grammatical sentence in English aloud", but that alone doesn't make it a "Meaningful/Sensible question". A question that is nonsense, can only have nonsensical answers.
We're not concerning ourselves with nonsensical questions. Thanks
@Wittgensteinism Also I meant more can someone believe in literally intrepration of the Bible and still believe in modern science without it being a logical contradiction? You might not think that is valid philosophic but your not the sole decider on what is valid philosophic question.
@natedaug1 "can someone believe in literally intrepration of the Bible and still believe in modern science without it being a logical contradiction?"
Yea, i got understood that, and i answered you; NO.
Are you asking whether the Biblical literalism contradicts modern science or not, or whether (if they do) one can believe both?
If ur asking the former, the answer's an empirical "Yes". If ur asking the latter, it's a logical "No", as in "Can one believe in a self-acknowledged contradiction?"
I ask for a seemingly easy request, "Can anyone give me a philosophical question or problem?" and this is what i get?
Honestly? You're asking me what exactly, whether a contradiction exists between science and the bible? Yes. That's not philosophy. Or at best, you're asking about the nature of a contradiction, which is logic.
You obviously havent thought about the myriad ways in which it could be interpreted. You need to learn 2 be CLEARER w/ ur questions
@Wittgensteinism the Tractatus, then how could he even write the Tractatus, if you read the last proposition, "Whereof one cannot speak, one should be silent." So Wittgenstein did believe there were valid philosophic questions, he just did not think you could answer them all. Anything can be valid philosophical question, even silly questions.
When your watching TV and you see that women that looks like she had a bad reaction to botox on the TV and she is talking about how we should sponser and child from some country that we never heard of because they are starving. When she is there does she starv too or does she have a mini fridge full of steaks and other foods? Couldn't she give them to the kids or does she think we are going to fall for that sham?
Why do we say "I gotta take a shit" when we have to shit, when in reality, we aren't taking anything, we are leaving it behind. shouldn't we say something like "I gotta leave a shit"?
i always think the same thing when i watch those history videos! maybe after the very first history video they just use the same people for every one following it. though that's highly doubtful.
For the history channel extras, I always thought that they just asked family or friends to act. It's not like they're reciting a monologue or something. Unless they're doing a voiceover, but I mean, still.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I like the lesbian bitch with the ugly face that looks exactlyu like all the other girls that have no fucking lives cause theyre all pieces of shit that should get jizzed on. bye 43
If teens are emotional rollercoasters, what's a non-emotional rollercoaster?
MoviesAllaAG 1 week ago
Can a demetor suck the soul out of a Horcrux?
angelgrrl17 3 weeks ago 3
Even better...Did Adam have a belly button?
Arborverden 1 month ago
If you ate your stomach, where would it go?
This question haunts me.
Not really a philosophigalajiggy question but hey.
MissiCupcake553 1 month ago
What did the person think they were doing when they first milked a cow???o.O
PrettyOdd1298 1 month ago
@PrettyOdd1298 They were copying calves that drink their mother's milk. Duh.
Arborverden 1 month ago
Along with the nipples on Adam....why are Adam and Eve painted with belly buttons....
1DasOmen 2 months ago
Please tell me you josh
loumiller2009 2 months ago
your eye on the right looks green and the other one brown....
laughalltheway1 2 months ago
Do we have hands to grab something or can we grab something because we have hands?
toaster1339 3 months ago
"I saw your beard first"
kenzietheterrible 3 months ago
What Is? What is Is? It is better to know how to learn, then to know.!
Kyuubiawsome 3 months ago
Comment removed
JTudders 5 months ago
Comment removed
JTudders 5 months ago
As a black belt in Karate i'd like to add the point that the drawer of your life can hold many things, but it is allways on rails.... only the shelf is truly free.
bluethird 5 months ago
If God made the world and everything in it, how did god begin?
0oJellyBeanso0 5 months ago
your hot
nicolasito77 6 months ago
@nicolasito77
Her hot what?
Lauen324 4 months ago
- Why do we call buildings ''buildings'' if they're already built?
- Why are pizza boxes square if pizzas are round?
- Why do pubs have car parks if you arent meant to drink and drive?
- Why doesnt glue stick to its lid?
LyricallySanee 6 months ago
@LyricallySanee I'd say glue does stick to it's lid
musicbox193 1 month ago
Why do we drive on the parkway and park in the driveway?
zvg4 6 months ago
Why do you have to be both interesting and attractive. It's quite distracting.
kevinandre91 7 months ago
@kevinandre91 That same thought goes through my head while I'm watching any of her videos
jayci68 6 months ago
who invented hugs? the first one musta been pretty weird
Bazookafreak101 7 months ago 35
The alphabet was made be listining to all the sounds people make the most often. The order is a random thing. Yes there is a speed of light it's called lightspeed. There is no speed of dark because dark can't move. Light moves darkness doesn't. You have succeeded at failing. Anymore questions, I love answering them.
Talkemist 8 months ago
There is even a bigger question about Adam and Eve that people have argued about for ages - did they have navels? They weren't born so they wouldn't have needed umbilical cords. But isn't it in humans' genetic makeup to have them?
mclarke825 8 months ago
If you were born deaf, what language would you think in?
goatheads369 9 months ago 3
@goatheads369 Pictures :)
weumumaway 9 months ago
"Won't" is the contracted version of "Will not". It is the same as "Don't" which is do not, "Haven't" which is "Have not" etc.
iMacOSXSnowLeopard 9 months ago
@iMacOSXSnowLeopard But it's not the same. "Don't" has "do" in it, and "haven't" has "have" in it. But "won't" doesn't have "will" in it - it has "wo," which doesn't make sense. But nobody says "willn't."
mclarke825 8 months ago
@mclarke825 I never said they did. the 'o' in won't comes from the 'o' in NOT. WILL NOT.
iMacOSXSnowLeopard 8 months ago
@iMacOSXSnowLeopard But the apostrophe stands in place of the o.
rachelofpie 7 months ago
If quizzes make you quizzical, what does a test make you?
fullmetalx91 10 months ago 6
@fullmetalx91 Testicle.
candybell357 2 months ago
Why do people say: I could care less. Because thats saying they DO care...should people say "I couldn't care less" instead? hmm....
ishassinger23 10 months ago
@ishassinger23 The correct phrase is "I couldn't care less". You need to realise that the majority of the population have no idea what they are actually saying. They know how to say it, but they do not know why they are saying it.
iMacOSXSnowLeopard 9 months ago
@ishassinger23 Educated people say "I couldn't care less." because that is correct. It is WRONG to say "I could care less." if you are trying to say that it doesn't matter at all to you.
voollyball 8 months ago
I think won't means (or used to mean) would not :)
HannahOnAir 10 months ago
@HannahOnAir The contracted version of "Would not" is wouldn't. Won't has never meant "Would not". Contractions are informal words only used in modern language.
iMacOSXSnowLeopard 9 months ago
If a tomato is a fruit, then is ketchup just a smoothie? Somebody please get back to me on this.
SuperLarry4 10 months ago 47
@SuperLarry4 it just might be a chutney ... but who am i to know ^^
Kogamii 3 months ago
@SuperLarry4 Philosoraptor, right?
candybell357 2 months ago
@SuperLarry4 If so, that's one bizarre smoothie, because ketchup has more than just tomatoes in it.
Arborverden 1 month ago
@SuperLarry4 is apple sauce a smoothie?
SkateAndCheerGirl 1 week ago
@thelauraroar Hmm actors? Maybe..
MusicAdd4ever 10 months ago
An atheist has bean getting me on the nipple thing 4 a long time! Thanks!
44SCB 11 months ago
If you're completely immersed in water, are you really wet? Because, technichally, you're not wet until the water clings to you and everything around you is dry. So you're not really wet yet, right?
fathomitthrice 11 months ago
why is green not a primary colour when it is everywhere in nature?
waytogo246 11 months ago
@waytogo246 Because you can make the color yourself, all you need to do is to mix yellow and blue if I'm not wrong :)
MusicAdd4ever 10 months ago
@waytogo246 Just because it is in nature doesn't mean that it is a primary colour. Green is made up of the pigments blue and yellow. We see purple and pink everywhere in nature also, but they are not primary colours.
iMacOSXSnowLeopard 9 months ago
@waytogo246 because the primary colours are those colours you can't get by mixing. If you mix blue and yellow you get green. But you cannot mix two colours to get red or yellow or blue. However the four of them are the basic colour. So you first have the primary colours (red, blue and yellow) then the basic colours (res, green, blue and yellow) and then the common colours (red, green, black?, blue, purple, grey, brown, pink, orange, yellow & white). BTW all the common colours are found in nature
Talkemist 8 months ago
Why did JK Rowling name Lily and Petunia both flower names?? If Harry was a girl would he have been like rose or something?
GumiYummi 11 months ago
does anyone else think she looks like amanda bynes?
DiamondMimiF 1 year ago 3
1. Went was taken
2. Its a modified sweat gland.
3. I don't understand the question?
xXChaosHavokXx 1 year ago
Why is there a 'g' in the words thought and though?
ryuuk96 1 year ago
@ryuuk96 It comes from the Dutch word "gedachte", which then became "thoght" in old english, and now "thought". Hopefully that answers your question.
iMacOSXSnowLeopard 9 months ago
@iMacOSXSnowLeopard Thanks!
ryuuk96 7 months ago
Yes.
lilmissveggie 1 year ago
what came first the chicken or the egg?? My teacher was talking about philosphy and he said this is one of the questions so i've been wondering and who decided after cow milk to milk a goat??
monkeytoenails123 1 year ago
@monkeytoenails123 Well, niether the chicken or the egg would have naturally came first. One of them had to be created. God created all things.
goatheads369 1 year ago
@goatheads369 No he didn't. And you have just contradicted yourself. If god did create all things, than he would have created the chicken first, and then the rooster.
iMacOSXSnowLeopard 9 months ago
@iMacOSXSnowLeopard I meant that neither the chicken or the egg could have come first on its own. It had to be created.
goatheads369 9 months ago
@goatheads369 Okay. Fair enough. I'm guessing you are religious?
iMacOSXSnowLeopard 9 months ago
@iMacOSXSnowLeopard Yes :)
goatheads369 9 months ago
@monkeytoenails123 The chicken, whether your religious or you follow the sane way of evolution. In both versions the chicken had to come first. I've you believe in any kind of creation story then you believe something something god created all the animals and therefore the chicken, that first chicken laid an egg. So it was first the chicken, however evolution tells is that over the course of centuries slowly live has developed, meaning there first was another creature akin to the chicken and
Talkemist 8 months ago
slowly over time it evolved and evolved and finnally became what is now known to be a chicken. The same goes for all life, it all evolved from one kind into another.
Talkemist 8 months ago
@Talkemist Ah, but if you subscribe to the theory of evolution, a creature that is /almost/ a chicken laid an egg, which hatched into a chicken. I consider that egg to have been a chicken egg, as it contained a chicken.
rachelofpie 7 months ago
why are you not naked?
DoctorSneakynipples 1 year ago
Please do not call this philosophy.
Tonyokay87 1 year ago
@Tonyokay87 I will be sure not to call "this" philosophy, because it is merely a word.
iMacOSXSnowLeopard 9 months ago
Where did the spork come from
tikipro 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHO CAME UP WITH THE IDEA OF A SNOWMAN?
cottoncandycool 1 year ago
WHO CAME UP WITH THE IDEA OF A SNOWMAN
cottoncandycool 1 year ago
Did Noah have termites on the ark?
waldrop32 1 year ago 5
who was the first person to look at a cow and go, i'm gonna pull those things under its belly and drink whatever comes out?
hersheyluva 1 year ago 102
@hersheyluva They knew milk was in it because they had seen the calfs drink from it.
goatheads369 10 months ago
@goatheads369 Well said.
iMacOSXSnowLeopard 9 months ago
@hersheyluva
or you could just think about it
and see that calfs drink that milk, therefore it should be good for us to drink it
sames goes for having sex
who thought im gonna shove my dick in this bitches axe wound...
ever noticed how a puppy has never seen anyone/thing have sex
and yet it still humps shit later in life...
jake3393 9 months ago
@hersheyluva I want to know who the first person was who looked at a lobster and thought, "Hmmm, with a little butter, that could be dinner!"
jayci68 6 months ago
@hersheyluva um they just saw it feeding its calf....so they knew milk came out -___-:
StrumItOut 6 months ago
@hersheyluva the guy who saw calves doing it.
PeterCarthy 6 months ago
@hersheyluva i never laughed so hard in my life
me2ontube 5 months ago
Why do sleeping pill bottles have warning labels saying "May cause drowsiness" when that's exactly what they're intended to do. Oh and another one. Why do some matresses have "Do not swallow" warnings? Yea, cause I'm definitely gonna try to swallow a damn matress..
Hannahoot 1 year ago 8
What would happen if Pinocchio said "My nose will now grow."
masterofpuppets22495 1 year ago 40
@masterofpuppets22495 Paradox
iMacOSXSnowLeopard 9 months ago
@masterofpuppets22495 the first second he sais it, nothing will happen because up untill that moment he isn't lying, but as soon as the fairytail mechanics have figured out he is lying it will grow. After which it will shrink again because he at that point isn't lying anymore.
Talkemist 8 months ago
@masterofpuppets22495 ITS A TRAP!
thesuperchony13 4 months ago
@masterofpuppets22495 He'd die.
icandy71 4 months ago
she's kinda hot
wowkik 1 year ago
@wowkik you got that right : D
lucasorelious 1 year ago
@wowkik Seriously! I'm a girl and I still think she's "bangin' "!
00PhsycoticLiamb00 1 year ago
What is a question?
infidel94 1 year ago 2
Comment removed
natedaug1 1 year ago
I understand getting meat from animals, but what possessed people to drink milk? Like "Hmm, this just came out of a cow. I think I'll drink it." Really?? Why would you do that?
flowerfades 1 year ago 4
@flowerfades Also, what was the guy who discovered cow milk doing? Did he just think "Oh, I think I'll pull on these dangly things and see what happens..."
Hannahoot 1 year ago
If you only use towels when you're completly clean, how do they get dirty?
unforgettable789 1 year ago 103
@unforgettable789 Towels become damp which is a perfect environment for bacteria to start growing. Therefore your towels are now full of fuck. So wash them
steveek123 1 year ago 3
should adam and eve have belly buttons??
greenemu 1 year ago 5
lol
These are not philosophical questions. Unless of course you're using the word "philosophical" to mean "gravely confused".
I don't think "nipples" are a philosophical topic..
Wittgensteinism 1 year ago
@Wittgensteinism Well, actuelly these questions are philosophical...
imorio 1 year ago
@imorio What about anything she said is "philosophical" to you???
Wittgensteinism 1 year ago
@Wittgensteinism A philosophical question is just a question about something nobody thinks about or everyone thinks is normal. The question about the nipples fits that perfectly.
imorio 1 year ago
@imorio lmao
"something nobody thinks about" ???
So i guess all of Western Philosophical literature can't be deemed "philosophy" because it's ideas that have already been thought about huh?
or "everyone thinks is normal"?? Well, then i guess you've proved me right yet again; this video doesn't address a question about something everyone thinks is normal. The question of nipples is simply misguided; the most accurate description about philosophical inquiry can be levered.
Adam didn't exist..
Wittgensteinism 1 year ago
@Wittgensteinism These are philosophical questions, who decides what is a philosophic question and what is not? The nipples question, could be asked like this, for a philosophic question, since modern science follows the female genome, and the creation story in the bible contradicts this, can one take the bible literally? Also if you try and get all Wittgensteinian, and say there are no valid philosophic questions, Wittgenstein came to change his views in the P.I., because if you think about
natedaug1 1 year ago
@natedaug1 "since modern science follows the female genome, and the creation story in the bible contradicts this, can one take the bible literally?"
Is THIS your philosophical question?
lol... Is that all u got?
Simple. It's an empirical question: Does science contradict the literal interpretation of the Bible?"
Yes.
"Can one take the Bible literally?"
Well, interesting wording (to say the least) but of COURSE one CAN. You just don't accept the science. So Yes, one CAN take it literally
Wittgensteinism 1 year ago
@Wittgensteinism Two sources my professor who taught the Wittgenstein class said they are two different philosophies in the Tractatus and P.I., and the opening sentence in the section on P.I. in Wikipedia says the same thing. Wittgenstein is famous for completely changing his viewpoint on philosophy in his life. Not too be rude, but that is common knowledge, so read more Wittgenstein. Also of course it can be asked, he just thought it was a waste of time to ask, because you can't answer it.
natedaug1 1 year ago
@natedaug1 "Wittgenstein is famous for completely changing his viewpoint on philosophy in his life"
Wow. A simple sentence like that shows me how little you understand Wittgenstein. Your professor is right that Wittgenstein produced two entirely different philosophical methods of descerning philosophical propositions, but Your ill-worded statement that he "changed his mind" is not. He changed his method but his conclusions about philosophy remianed the same. I think that they're complimentary
Wittgensteinism 1 year ago
@natedaug1 Good job Wikipediaing the P.I. but maybe you should try reading it.
Which, by the way, for anyone to speak so candidly certain about the meaning and thesis of either the Tractatus and/or the P.I., i think shows again how little you've actually read of him. Understanding philosophical points that Wittgenstein makes is only half of the battle. The other half is interpreting Wittgenstein, which makes his method so uniquely open and illustrative. Wittgenstein DOES more than he SAYS
Wittgensteinism 1 year ago
@natedaug1 So you're saying that a question CAN be asked and yet there is no answer?
Do you understand that this would be the Holy Grail of philosophy for Wittgenstein?
You're obviously confused about what he meant. Yes a question can be asked as in "I said a grammatical sentence in English aloud", but that alone doesn't make it a "Meaningful/Sensible question". A question that is nonsense, can only have nonsensical answers.
We're not concerning ourselves with nonsensical questions. Thanks
Wittgensteinism 1 year ago
@Wittgensteinism Also I meant more can someone believe in literally intrepration of the Bible and still believe in modern science without it being a logical contradiction? You might not think that is valid philosophic but your not the sole decider on what is valid philosophic question.
natedaug1 1 year ago
@natedaug1 "can someone believe in literally intrepration of the Bible and still believe in modern science without it being a logical contradiction?"
Yea, i got understood that, and i answered you; NO.
Are you asking whether the Biblical literalism contradicts modern science or not, or whether (if they do) one can believe both?
If ur asking the former, the answer's an empirical "Yes". If ur asking the latter, it's a logical "No", as in "Can one believe in a self-acknowledged contradiction?"
Wittgensteinism 1 year ago
@natedaug1 **SIGH**
See what i mean?
I ask for a seemingly easy request, "Can anyone give me a philosophical question or problem?" and this is what i get?
Honestly? You're asking me what exactly, whether a contradiction exists between science and the bible? Yes. That's not philosophy. Or at best, you're asking about the nature of a contradiction, which is logic.
You obviously havent thought about the myriad ways in which it could be interpreted. You need to learn 2 be CLEARER w/ ur questions
Wittgensteinism 1 year ago
Comment removed
natedaug1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@natedaug1 "Your a pretentious pseudo intellectual. Burn in hell."
So i other words, you CAN'T give me either a philosophical statement, question, or problem at all.
Thank you for helping to prove my point.
See you in hell friend!
Wittgensteinism 1 year ago
@Wittgensteinism the Tractatus, then how could he even write the Tractatus, if you read the last proposition, "Whereof one cannot speak, one should be silent." So Wittgenstein did believe there were valid philosophic questions, he just did not think you could answer them all. Anything can be valid philosophical question, even silly questions.
natedaug1 1 year ago
@natedaug1 It sounds like you thoroughly misinterpret Wittgenstein.
"Wittgenstein came to change his views in the P.I"
Not really. lol But i'm curious as to where you hear that.
"Wittgenstein did believe there were valid philosophic questions, he just did not think you could answer them all"
Wrong again! If it cannot be answered, it cannot be asked!
"how could he even write the Tractatus?"
The point of the Tractatus is in its nonsensical nature. It serves to illustrate his point directly
Wittgensteinism 1 year ago
@imorio I challenge you to give me (ask me) a genuine philosophical question, if you think such a thing truly exists....
Wittgensteinism 1 year ago
I LIKE YOUR BEARS
RolyPolyNicoley 1 year ago
why doesn't glue stick to the bottle?
unforgettable789 1 year ago
was it preplanned that the word inuendo is actually an inuendo itself?
redrobinrocker144 1 year ago
Nice nipple contradiction. Who was Cain's wife?
960random 1 year ago 3
can we get married please?
silverguy00 1 year ago
Why is it called a 'drive-thru' if you still have to stop?
thepurpleroom1 1 year ago 3
When your watching TV and you see that women that looks like she had a bad reaction to botox on the TV and she is talking about how we should sponser and child from some country that we never heard of because they are starving. When she is there does she starv too or does she have a mini fridge full of steaks and other foods? Couldn't she give them to the kids or does she think we are going to fall for that sham?
swiimgfreek 1 year ago 3
funny, and i bet shes getting banged by a wigger
elpinchewey666 1 year ago
If god created the earth wot created god
jem45000 1 year ago
@jem45000 i would like this comment if you had spelled "what" right lol.
JonDelzell17 1 year ago
@jem45000 u could try rerading the bible but i think somethings were not ment to know.
gambitsgirl100 1 year ago
So funny:) You are so cute!
komala94 1 year ago
Why do fat chance and slim chance mean the same thing?
Squeegee33 1 year ago 3
If the temperature is zero outside today and it's going to be twice as cold tomorrow, how cold will it be?
Squeegee33 1 year ago 6
@Squeegee33" 2x0=0" lol good question
gambitsgirl100 1 year ago
Whose idea was it to put an S in the word lisp?
Squeegee33 1 year ago 3
Why does the expression go "I'm head over heals" when your head is already over your heals, shouldn't we say something like "I'm heals over head"?
Squeegee33 1 year ago 2
Why do we say "I gotta take a shit" when we have to shit, when in reality, we aren't taking anything, we are leaving it behind. shouldn't we say something like "I gotta leave a shit"?
Squeegee33 1 year ago 2
Why do people call it MCDICKS? when it's not called MCDICKALDS, it's MCDONALDS, so shouldn't they call it MCDONS for short?
Squeegee33 1 year ago
why do you use "ph" when you have the letter f?
RumuhAlg 1 year ago 2
Will the id from pokemon ever actually catch em all??
JerryTheBeast 1 year ago
i believe would not=won't
UnParapluieBleu 1 year ago
wouldn't
nickfizzle1212 1 year ago
i wouldn't say that
nickfizzle1212 1 year ago
@UnParapluieBleu Will not = Won't, Would not = Wouldn't
candybell357 2 months ago
HOW DO YOU FIND THE VOLUME OF AN EGG!?
Colormehappy21 2 years ago 2
@Colormehappy21
drop it in water and measure the displacement
AwakeAgainstAllOdds 1 year ago 2
If a noun is a person, place or thing, and parts of speech are "things", is everything (verbs, adjectives, etc.) a noun?
bec2ab 2 years ago
@bec2ab yes the words 'verb', 'adjective' and all the others are nouns
musicbox193 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I'm sorry, but your face looks obnoxious. I couldn't listen to a word you said without me imagining a way to suplex your face.
Crunkmastaflexx 2 years ago
lol....dude i fucking love you i thought i was the only one here who wanted to do that
coronah 2 years ago
hahahahahahah made my day
pell819 2 years ago
Why is it that when something goes by ship its cargo but when something goes by car its a shipment?
mewsemail 2 years ago 3
where did jamie lynn spears go after she got pregnant?
she pretty much vanished.
LucindaHeartattack11 2 years ago 3
who's idea was it to add an 's' in the word Lisp?
cameronXadventure 2 years ago 28
The fisrt question is "would not"
ShRiNkInGMuShRoOmS 2 years ago
wrong again fool
insomniac1122 2 years ago
Oh am i "wrong again" fool
Considering i only commented once.
?
ShRiNkInGMuShRoOmS 2 years ago
Why is phonetic not spelled phonetically?
Anywhoo, you can't back up an evolutionary-based theory with creationism :P
tinyartist18 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ur deep and meaningful question about adams nipples i think speaks for itself as evidence the bible is full of crap... hmm
tombing111 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I want to fuck you(:
ninjalover1000 2 years ago
i always think the same thing when i watch those history videos! maybe after the very first history video they just use the same people for every one following it. though that's highly doubtful.
jkrstn 2 years ago
For the history channel extras, I always thought that they just asked family or friends to act. It's not like they're reciting a monologue or something. Unless they're doing a voiceover, but I mean, still.
Gomezzio 2 years ago
i got one if there's the speed of light then whats the speed of dark?
icetoph 2 years ago
q2. Why wouldn't god make nipples on everything, they look cool:) Only evolution could make just 2 nipples.
moegreen2 2 years ago
Why are you so beautiful?
Pumaxavier 2 years ago
Why do doctors tell you to "Take care" after you leave their office, but if you really do, then they would be bankrupt.
Emmarockz01 2 years ago
@Emmarockz01 because it is just a polite thing to say.
Talkemist 8 months ago
Was the word "bed" meant to look like a bed?
joelwrussell 2 years ago 69
oooh! i never saw that until just now, haha thats kool
fungurl92 2 years ago
im freakin out!
thakidd86 2 years ago
@joelwrussell or the word 'shark'
ScreamoBaptism 1 year ago
@joelwrussell No it is probably just a coincidence, most people wouldn't even notice that.
Talkemist 8 months ago
Wen bald men get their driver's licence, what do they put in the "hair color" catagory?
OwlMae 2 years ago 83
@OwlMae Shiny?
LemonPopsiclez 1 year ago
@OwlMae the color of their eyebrows...
Cobaltchill 1 year ago
@OwlMae Flesh or shiny.
ShadowKissedBella 1 year ago
@OwlMae If hair grows on his head, but no one is there to see it, does it really grow?
Way more interesting than that tree falling crap.
Extertainment 1 year ago
@OwlMae uhm bald.
Talkemist 8 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I like the lesbian bitch with the ugly face that looks exactlyu like all the other girls that have no fucking lives cause theyre all pieces of shit that should get jizzed on. bye 43
dondr267 2 years ago