I find it so funny and so sad that people make these outrageous claims that global warming is fake that have absolutely NO education on the subject. Here is an idea go through the peer reviewed science articles or journals and try to find how many deny global warming. I can save you some time its zero. Don't go with opinions go with the facts.
@rams392. Well you claim that CO2 "is not a significant driver of temperature" is clearly false, there are large numbers of science journals that make this correlation. It is basic chemistry that CO2 absorbs long wave radiation, as well as nitric oxides and sulfur oxides. By the way 0.038% of the atmosphere is equal to 2.996×10^12 tons of CO2, excluding the other increasing greenhouse gases, just another way to look at it.
@rams392 First of all the science articles I get data from are peer reviewed science articles (this is key) like 'Nature' for example(fortunately I go to a university that pays for these subscriptions). The amount of manmade CO2 in the atmosphere is about 1/3, with preindustrial rates of about 250ppm compared to todays level of about 380ppm, so its really about 1.025x10^12 tons of manmade CO2.
Hold on lol global warming cars main source and people. How many rain forests get cut down each year to make way for new houses. Isn't it trees that soak up the Co2 in first place. I think the government and scientists have lost the plot.
No it isn't a minor greenhouse gas.I'll try and keep this simple,as I think you might be poorly educated. There are large flows of gases that warm the planet, and these are well understood. So gases are exchanged between the air, oceans, soils and vegetation. It's not the sizes of these fluxes that matter as such, its the net build up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere that matters.Co2 was 280ppm now its 385-it drives warming effects which then drive feedbacks like increased water vapour.
You're talking about a speculative interaction between greenhouse gases. It is still a minor greenhouse gas.
Fact is, the warming was NEVER man-made, but due to increased sunspot activity. If you look at the historical temp scale versus the sunspot activity cycle, you will see a much better correlation between those two than between Co2 levels and historical temps.
It is you who is poorly educated via the pure propaganda of the made made warming hoax.
I find it so funny and so sad that people make these outrageous claims that global warming is fake that have absolutely NO education on the subject. Here is an idea go through the peer reviewed science articles or journals and try to find how many deny global warming. I can save you some time its zero. Don't go with opinions go with the facts.
klooty5 1 year ago
@klooty5 nobody denys global warming or cooling or climate change, but the "fact" that climate it manmade.
rams392 1 year ago
@rams392. Well you claim that CO2 "is not a significant driver of temperature" is clearly false, there are large numbers of science journals that make this correlation. It is basic chemistry that CO2 absorbs long wave radiation, as well as nitric oxides and sulfur oxides. By the way 0.038% of the atmosphere is equal to 2.996×10^12 tons of CO2, excluding the other increasing greenhouse gases, just another way to look at it.
klooty5 1 year ago
@klooty5 thanks, i read a lot of articles in these science journals, i know what they say about co2 and global temperature.
by the way about 95% of the 2.996×10^12 tons of co2 are natural, not manmade.
rams392 1 year ago
@rams392 First of all the science articles I get data from are peer reviewed science articles (this is key) like 'Nature' for example(fortunately I go to a university that pays for these subscriptions). The amount of manmade CO2 in the atmosphere is about 1/3, with preindustrial rates of about 250ppm compared to todays level of about 380ppm, so its really about 1.025x10^12 tons of manmade CO2.
klooty5 1 year ago
thanks!
jannettelarson 1 year ago
Hold on lol global warming cars main source and people. How many rain forests get cut down each year to make way for new houses. Isn't it trees that soak up the Co2 in first place. I think the government and scientists have lost the plot.
DENNIS2M99 2 years ago
you know what also emits CO2 the 2 billion cars in the world
AceofDimonds0 2 years ago
CO2 is minor greenhouse gas.
It takes all of 30 minutes of research to discover that Al Gore and the MSM newscam puppets are nothing but a pack of outrageous liars.
Good video, guy!
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 2 years ago
No it isn't a minor greenhouse gas.I'll try and keep this simple,as I think you might be poorly educated. There are large flows of gases that warm the planet, and these are well understood. So gases are exchanged between the air, oceans, soils and vegetation. It's not the sizes of these fluxes that matter as such, its the net build up of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere that matters.Co2 was 280ppm now its 385-it drives warming effects which then drive feedbacks like increased water vapour.
DaveG37 1 year ago
@DaveG37
You're talking about a speculative interaction between greenhouse gases. It is still a minor greenhouse gas.
Fact is, the warming was NEVER man-made, but due to increased sunspot activity. If you look at the historical temp scale versus the sunspot activity cycle, you will see a much better correlation between those two than between Co2 levels and historical temps.
It is you who is poorly educated via the pure propaganda of the made made warming hoax.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 1 year ago
@DaveG37
Smash your TV set and instantly boost your IQ by 15%.
EvilUSAandthe911Lie 1 year ago 3