Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
Except.....I thought the facial image wasn't perceivable unless photographed and seen as a negative? They weren't taking too many photos in the 6th century....
GetMeThere1 1 year ago
@GetMeThere1 The image is quite perceivable in it's natural form, you can see that without doubt.Also if the Pantacrator was copied from the shroud in the 6th century it is quite possible the image was much more noticeable then, as age may have deminished the image...remember it's linen not stone.
Flagrum3 1 year ago