@turin1 Interesting comment! The dry runs completed, the cameras set up accurately at the impact point with room to spare, then on the actual run one of the remote control guys decides not to accelerate so fast! Why? 'Cause he thought it would be better! Result - impact point 10m from all the dry runs and out of view of the fixed high speed cameras. Doh!
@WOGI5M My judgement....approximately 200,or so...100 is enough to cause death,50 for severe injuries,and 25 minor harms....200 is enough to tear your head off body and eject it through windshield...
These are 20 year old cars before crash testing and safety really started(mid 1990s in when the real concern and changes started, the IIHS really kicked it off). If these were brand new 5-star top safety picks with the strongest safet cages and lowest dummy movement recordings on the market then they wouldve survived.
@calendar11 The VW Golf has 2 millimeters :P of crumple zone, If it were a larger car like the ones in this crash test then that would offer more room to help you slow down, like SUVs with hoods that go out 4-6+ feet (especially 5-star crash tested BOF Ones) and full-size cars(5 star) and even a few midsize ones wouldve fared far better than the VW in that crash test, plus 62 mph is different than 60. If the IIHS crashed a car at 40.8 mph then they have to redo it.
2 millimeters. Give me real data. Full size cars of course has longer crumple zones but it's still not enough to make survivable g forces. In the video about golf crash biomechanics expert speaks about 120g, 150g or even 200g, when human body can survive about 50 horizontal g, with lifelong damages. So 1 or maybe 2 feet longer crumple zones (compared to golf) in full size cars can't help you at 100km/h crash.
Speaking of the Smart Car, it hits at Concrete Wall @ 70 MPH and the driver wouldve survived. Yes I understand its not a car to car accident but the driver still wouldve survived. Also in the real world your chances of survival are that much greater if it is a full frontal wreck, the did offset in the test to show worst case scenario. My Uncle survived a 55-60 mph head on Accident in his Tahoe, he hit a new Ford Expedition that went in his lane
Survival in smart car is far less possible than in that golf. Actually, impossible. Doesn't matter, that smarts passenger cell is almost in tact. Smart has very short crumple zones, so it stops very fast, and the faster you stop, the less chances you have. G loads are just too high. Andy in this video also says, that modern cars are not able to survive such crash. I'm happy about your uncle, but I think the speed was a bit less.
@DarkKnightBob1o1 Idiot.. Both of the cars are driving @ 60.. 60+60=120, thats why he said 120, AND No car would have survived a 120Mph/200Kph crash at all
cmon... i hate it when these stupid shows destroy nice cars. Jeremy from top gear recently shot an 500 horsepower evo 8 with a cannon... granted since the car was formerly owned by a drug dealer it was to be destroyed anyway.. still breaks my heart to see that happen... the car wasnt the one dealing drugs... political logic there...
These cars came to the USA and were fixed up at a body shop, now on a used car dealership lot to be sold to an unsuspecting yank. Hopefully a soccer mum.
my uncle survived a closing speed of about 140 mph he was in a van and another person in a compact car going the opposite way on the other side of the freeway and the guy in the compact car got a heart attack or fell asleep (police are not sure) and there was no barriers on the median of the freeway so the compact car went down the ditch in the median(not a wall) and smashed into the car my uncle was in and my uncle was the driver and the impact was on the driver side and he survived :0
well, (overtaking) on provincial roads are were most of the nastiest accidents happen, and there there are no dividers between the two directions of traffic.
people that say fifth gear sucks and top gear rules talk as if they have a stake in the top gear program ie they talk as if they had put their money in top gear either in producing the program or in gambling bet. i like both programs because of the most important reason-they are made to entertain us free of charge maybe except for the stupid tv license shit(top gear). if u dont like either program, click on another video no need to type negative remarks about the brand etc. imo
So when the IIHS or other offset crash tests are conducted at 40mph its really equal to two cars hitting head on at a relatively low speed of each traveling at 20mph?
no it's like 2 cars hitting head-on both going a bit less than 40 mph, because even though there's now 2 things going ~40, there's also 2 crumple zones.
I guess some say this isn't a head on crash, as this an offset crash. Only part of the front ends impact. And that's also the problem with these older cars. The Volvo 900 series certainly did have a safety cell, but the design wasn't that great in an offset crash, which nowadays is the standard EuroNCAP frontal impact crash. The Volvo 850 probably would do a bit better. But as some have pointed out, too much deceleration will still kill you, even if the safety cell were intact.
modern cars are disigned to absorb the shock, the whole body will, thats what they call a body shell that is used in new cars like the merc , BMW, and the luxes .
so even if the crash was head on, even the rear of the car will be dameged, cuz a part of the shock will be transsmitted to it through the body shell, redusing the damage that will be done to the inside of the car, the cocpet
= saving the passengers, but totally destroying the car
You dont think modern cars are better? Are you serious? A modern car will try to absorb the energy rather than having it pass straight through the chassis and into your body. The more energy the car absorbs the better the chances of survival.
Big heavy solid old cars made from steel do not fold well and will kill you. You clearly dont understand the physics behind modern safety cells.
what he was saying was about the A pillar. the front body of a modern car should crush to absorb the impact whilst the A pillar should withstand it to protect the passenger from sandwiching between the dashboard and the seat.
just incredible. It sounded like a bomb blast or something. I reckon they should've put crash dummies in the car. We obviously know what would be left of the driver but i would've liked to see what would happen to dummies in the passenger seats.
The problem with accident is the energy that is releasd. Roughly it's (impact = weight X speed.)So The heaviest has more chance to push the other car aside. This increases the time/distance in which it comes to a stop. Result: less G-forces for the people inside leading to theoretical less injury. (This is what airbags do) ONE PROBLEM. the energy released in a big crash is so massive that the car's structure will collaps, crushing everybody inside. At the moment French cars are the strongest
This is a pretty good example of what could happen on a Canadian freeway, as most of Canada's highways allow you to drive minumum 40mph and maximum 75mph slightly faster than the teast in this video. I think this video reminds us to think twice before turning into the passing lane.
In march, I had a head on collision at 55 mph each head on when someone swerved into my lane. I was in a volvo s40, he was in a 4 door wrangler. I had a shattered femur, ruptured spleen, fractured skull, 4 broken ribs, head lacerations, and a grapfruit sized open wound on my leg. I was in the hospital for 5 wks. It was bad, but I think the volvo kept me from dying since his car outweighed mine by a full ton. He was fine...douche.
ha my brother has a volvo s80 and im gettin a 2 door wrangler....i just found it funny...........but the s80 actually weigh more than the wranglers...im guessing the s40s dont
it all depends on the type of car. prince naseem survived a head on crash wivut a scratch. he was driving a mercedes slr while the other driver was driving a ford and he suffered multiple broken bones in almost every major part of his body.
I done that a few years ago. Smashed head on. Lost my license for 3 years and only got away without Jail because, and i have no idea how, no one was badly injured!!!!
I'm telling you, its not worth over taking those sunday drivers, sit back, chill and take your time people!!!
bmw looked like it was going faster
mrzkhan1 1 day ago
Lots of cameras around and none got a decent shot.
Come on guys, time to TOP your GEAR.
turin1 3 months ago 2
@turin1 Interesting comment! The dry runs completed, the cameras set up accurately at the impact point with room to spare, then on the actual run one of the remote control guys decides not to accelerate so fast! Why? 'Cause he thought it would be better! Result - impact point 10m from all the dry runs and out of view of the fixed high speed cameras. Doh!
AndyB007 2 months ago
feel sorry for tht poor bimmer :(
Cars4Life324 4 months ago
Now what happens at 250mph??
TimpBizkit 5 months ago
I wouldnt like to be in that volvo
townace957 6 months ago
BMW ftw
Scandinavian92 6 months ago
Swedish Perfection
toyotaprius79 8 months ago
@toyotaprius79, Your username is disgusting.
Ferrari73703 2 months ago
@Ferrari73703 Well, we all have our own opinions. Your name and your prejudice is predictable also.
toyotaprius79 2 months ago
what would the g reading be at impact?
WOGI5M 9 months ago
@WOGI5M My judgement....approximately 200,or so...100 is enough to cause death,50 for severe injuries,and 25 minor harms....200 is enough to tear your head off body and eject it through windshield...
5ky5tr1d3r 9 months ago
I do 90mph all the time if I crash I will instantly die.
whoiszizou 11 months ago
BMW wins!
GreatTiberiusJackson 1 year ago
I would rather sit in the volvos backseat.
morrarN 1 year ago 2
omg... GIANT RC CARS!!!
tomboneschevy 1 year ago
The crash wasnt really head on.. more to the side of each.
The crash would have been even more worse then this if it was direct head on....
Toyota4Life 1 year ago
@Toyota4Life that was the intention.
GIwillo 8 months ago
Damn!!!! :O
Evo10Rocks 1 year ago
amazing like burnout paradise :D :D
kzm539 1 year ago
wat a waste of two wonderful cars
rifledude28 1 year ago
fucking owwwned
fight2befree420 1 year ago
...there would have been no survivors.....air bags would not have helped...
NO SHIT TIFF lol
expurgatetor 1 year ago 2
Thats one of the best examples of being able to feel such impact visually
expurgatetor 1 year ago
@expurgatetor , it would be better in hd or 3d maybe
YoshiMayhem 1 year ago
what happened to the THREE high speed cameras????
calholli 1 year ago
Why so poor camera views`?
stonee206 1 year ago
These old BMW-s are still very popular.Great car!
eestlane 1 year ago
I think this is just a prompt to get people with these age of vehicle's to get a brand new car.
KainBaddeley 1 year ago 3
These are 20 year old cars before crash testing and safety really started(mid 1990s in when the real concern and changes started, the IIHS really kicked it off). If these were brand new 5-star top safety picks with the strongest safet cages and lowest dummy movement recordings on the market then they wouldve survived.
98MAzdaMilleniaS 1 year ago 3
@98MAzdaMilleniaS
They wouldn't. G forces would be too high. Search on youtube: Crash test 100km-h VW Golf 2008.
calendar11 1 year ago
@calendar11 The VW Golf has 2 millimeters :P of crumple zone, If it were a larger car like the ones in this crash test then that would offer more room to help you slow down, like SUVs with hoods that go out 4-6+ feet (especially 5-star crash tested BOF Ones) and full-size cars(5 star) and even a few midsize ones wouldve fared far better than the VW in that crash test, plus 62 mph is different than 60. If the IIHS crashed a car at 40.8 mph then they have to redo it.
98MAzdaMilleniaS 1 year ago
@98MAzdaMilleniaS
@98MAzdaMilleniaS
2 millimeters. Give me real data. Full size cars of course has longer crumple zones but it's still not enough to make survivable g forces. In the video about golf crash biomechanics expert speaks about 120g, 150g or even 200g, when human body can survive about 50 horizontal g, with lifelong damages. So 1 or maybe 2 feet longer crumple zones (compared to golf) in full size cars can't help you at 100km/h crash.
calendar11 1 year ago
@98MAzdaMilleniaS
Such crash you would survive unless you drive large modern off-roader and crash into smart or something like that.
calendar11 1 year ago
@calendar11
youtube.com/watch?v=CJHpUO-S0i8
Speaking of the Smart Car, it hits at Concrete Wall @ 70 MPH and the driver wouldve survived. Yes I understand its not a car to car accident but the driver still wouldve survived. Also in the real world your chances of survival are that much greater if it is a full frontal wreck, the did offset in the test to show worst case scenario. My Uncle survived a 55-60 mph head on Accident in his Tahoe, he hit a new Ford Expedition that went in his lane
98MAzdaMilleniaS 1 year ago
@98MAzdaMilleniaS
Survival in smart car is far less possible than in that golf. Actually, impossible. Doesn't matter, that smarts passenger cell is almost in tact. Smart has very short crumple zones, so it stops very fast, and the faster you stop, the less chances you have. G loads are just too high. Andy in this video also says, that modern cars are not able to survive such crash. I'm happy about your uncle, but I think the speed was a bit less.
calendar11 1 year ago
this comment was made over a month ago btw. jesus christ.
Some people give ashit too much
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
a little duck tape an your good to go.
yellowcorba1 1 year ago
how many other people said fucken hell?
Qwertyplum69er 1 year ago
Chuck Norris would have walked away from either car.
rustydog0329 1 year ago 4
@rustydog0329
Actually, the car Chuck Norris would be driving would come out of it unscathed.
Watcher3223 1 year ago
This is a 120mph test NOT a 60mph test.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 Idiot.. Both of the cars are driving @ 60.. 60+60=120, thats why he said 120, AND No car would have survived a 120Mph/200Kph crash at all
stonee206 1 year ago
I think you need to work on your reading comprehension.
Check the title of the video.....idiot
And OBVIOUSLY no car would survive a 120mph crash.
"Stonee206 a model... idiot?"
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 Wtf? You have to say what you mean, and not bullshit, cause what you said, was: This is a 120 mph test NOT 60... FAIL
stonee206 1 year ago
I wasn't talking about about the video I was talking about the title.
I said what I meant. Mabye you should worry about other things if you can't take the hint.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
96km/h + 96km/h = 192 km/h :D
BrundukasLT 1 year ago
WTF? how much is 60Mp/h in Km/h?
bengo76 1 year ago
@bengo76 96 km/h
Greeny0Pwns 1 year ago
@bengo76 60mp/h is about 120 km/h
jay128k 1 year ago
@jay128k Thanks alot man u helped me!
bengo76 1 year ago
@bengo76
devilshalash 1 year ago
i love it how unhigh tech they are.... the used strings to control the steering LOL
wakojako49 1 year ago
cmon... i hate it when these stupid shows destroy nice cars. Jeremy from top gear recently shot an 500 horsepower evo 8 with a cannon... granted since the car was formerly owned by a drug dealer it was to be destroyed anyway.. still breaks my heart to see that happen... the car wasnt the one dealing drugs... political logic there...
TypeRSXk20 1 year ago
what the hell that was a waste of a bmw big six
kbpwnzu 1 year ago
sounded like a gunshot jeez
moderator130 1 year ago
meh it'll buff out
franf7 1 year ago 3
My name is Snaglepuss I am an Aligator, I bit it on knee now I'll see ya later.
oblongjoeisreal 1 year ago
See how @ 1:02 Bmw's Steering wheel starts shaking, The car was afraid to die :(
trytthisnow 1 year ago 41
holy shit
Rafflersauce 1 year ago
it'll buff out.
sunpacific 1 year ago 56
This comment has received too many negative votes show
It was only a scratch. My anus can withstand this speed.
OTSTRETFORD 1 year ago
@OTSTRETFORD
many years of being trained and months of 2 litres up the dark stink I'm sure yours can.
escapedcops08 1 year ago
Oh it can.
OTSTRETFORD 1 year ago
These cars came to the USA and were fixed up at a body shop, now on a used car dealership lot to be sold to an unsuspecting yank. Hopefully a soccer mum.
KeiichiTsuchiyadrift 1 year ago
the slow motion looks pretty cool. the beamer kinda goes through the volvo.. the left headlight of the volvo keeps going for a while after the impact
GraveDiggerIII 2 years ago 2
I would like if they crashed Citroen Xm,he is the same age as BMW and Volvo,Xm look's tough.
Stralle92 2 years ago
dusted...enough said
CarzanpaintBall4life 2 years ago
Even if the safety cell of either car were intact, you would still have been killed by massive internal injuries.....this is how Diana was killed.
smiffy1071 2 years ago
diana is still a live i was on a date with her yesturday , she had a salad then i gave her some special mayonnaise to taste
udynick 2 years ago
dirty boy! ;)
smiffy1071 2 years ago
@smiffy1071
She died because she didn't wear the seat belt and she hit the front seat. Her bodyguard did wear it and he survived.
lfsracer79 2 years ago
why wear seatbelts
LLCoolPass 2 years ago
Speed=dead
zilezid 2 years ago
BOOOOOOOOOOOOM 3:06
rx8productionz 2 years ago
at 1:10 look at the headlight still goin lol
jessiejames2012 2 years ago
ever heard of "reflection" and "sun"?
purpleGoAhead 2 years ago
@purpleGoAhead wtf does that mean
jessiejames2012 2 years ago
1:10 :o
SzfajcarsGirl 2 years ago
OMFG!!!!!!!!!!!!!
brewyn243 2 years ago 2
that shit was crazy
jessiejames2012 2 years ago
my uncle survived a closing speed of about 140 mph he was in a van and another person in a compact car going the opposite way on the other side of the freeway and the guy in the compact car got a heart attack or fell asleep (police are not sure) and there was no barriers on the median of the freeway so the compact car went down the ditch in the median(not a wall) and smashed into the car my uncle was in and my uncle was the driver and the impact was on the driver side and he survived :0
TheEverythingKing85 2 years ago
why dont they do the crash head on.....license plate to license plate....
corollamandx89 2 years ago
Because very few crashes like that happen and this way of crash testing is a lot tougher for the car.
What killed the passangers here were the g-forces. The best way to reduce them is a longer front,
Ty4ons 2 years ago
Because very few real life accidents are full head on. Most people would try to avoid each other, unless they were asleep at the wheel.
smiffy1071 2 years ago
well, (overtaking) on provincial roads are were most of the nastiest accidents happen, and there there are no dividers between the two directions of traffic.
mipmipmipmipmip 2 years ago
haven't seen fifth gear 'cept on here...........do love a good head on but!!!
proffesorcaresser 2 years ago
Even IF a car were to be made to withstand the forces, the occupants would suffer tremendous injuries at best.
looncraz 2 years ago
way to totally destroy an e34. you guys fail top gear FTW
poomuncher5000 2 years ago 4
i couldnt agree with you more mate
SCR09213 2 years ago
ive got an e34 in my driveway, shes rubbish has a new tranny and coolant system and the trannys still leaking. lol but still topgear FTW still
poomuncher5000 2 years ago 2
people that say fifth gear sucks and top gear rules talk as if they have a stake in the top gear program ie they talk as if they had put their money in top gear either in producing the program or in gambling bet. i like both programs because of the most important reason-they are made to entertain us free of charge maybe except for the stupid tv license shit(top gear). if u dont like either program, click on another video no need to type negative remarks about the brand etc. imo
eaglei 2 years ago 4
so airbags a for relatively slow speed crashes
f4r20 2 years ago 2
true, but also high speed. 120mph (closing speed) are just immense speeds... massive amount of energy to disperse.
ZesPak 2 years ago
jesus!!!
MrPhilsta 2 years ago
So when the IIHS or other offset crash tests are conducted at 40mph its really equal to two cars hitting head on at a relatively low speed of each traveling at 20mph?
Planeguy13 2 years ago
NO older cars are not very safe other than the chevy lumina 2 GEN and the IIHS test is if you were to hit a car of the same size.
FantomLightning 2 years ago
no it's like 2 cars hitting head-on both going a bit less than 40 mph, because even though there's now 2 things going ~40, there's also 2 crumple zones.
the IIHS's barrier crumples a bit though
trucksoner 2 years ago
OMG...that is the most evil sound...just close your eyes and listen to it...like a cannon
12ozwrecker 2 years ago
Holy shit xD
scarface456123789 2 years ago
God damn....
Really make you think twice...
Toyota4Life 2 years ago
about what? :P
spriggan969 2 years ago
lol...At least the engine is OK!
1pinchipendejo 2 years ago
ebay time!
Algidcomedy 2 years ago
Lesson to be learned: don't drive your car at 60mph head on into another car going the same speed.
omocorp 2 years ago 2
its 120 mph
Metalgear55 2 years ago 2
I guess some say this isn't a head on crash, as this an offset crash. Only part of the front ends impact. And that's also the problem with these older cars. The Volvo 900 series certainly did have a safety cell, but the design wasn't that great in an offset crash, which nowadays is the standard EuroNCAP frontal impact crash. The Volvo 850 probably would do a bit better. But as some have pointed out, too much deceleration will still kill you, even if the safety cell were intact.
clothearednincompoop 2 years ago
1:06 is insane!
catlopy47cp 2 years ago
1:05 teki hızlara bakın bmw volvodan kat kat hızlı girio çarpışmaya
fizik kurallarını göz önüne alırsak hızlı olan her zamn karşısındakini dağıtır
ikiside aynı hızla gitse yani eşitlik olsa sonç bambaşka olurdu
lsass 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
if you think modern cars would do better you are wrong
this old cars are made from steel and not from lite tin like todays cars
drive carefully
blazerx920 2 years ago
just to correct you dude.
modern cars are disigned to absorb the shock, the whole body will, thats what they call a body shell that is used in new cars like the merc , BMW, and the luxes .
so even if the crash was head on, even the rear of the car will be dameged, cuz a part of the shock will be transsmitted to it through the body shell, redusing the damage that will be done to the inside of the car, the cocpet
= saving the passengers, but totally destroying the car
gday ;)
Commodore1236 2 years ago 3
Huh, there speaks the expert. Utter nonsense.
swordfish1986 2 years ago 2
You dont think modern cars are better? Are you serious? A modern car will try to absorb the energy rather than having it pass straight through the chassis and into your body. The more energy the car absorbs the better the chances of survival.
Big heavy solid old cars made from steel do not fold well and will kill you. You clearly dont understand the physics behind modern safety cells.
samsemtex 2 years ago 3
what he was saying was about the A pillar. the front body of a modern car should crush to absorb the impact whilst the A pillar should withstand it to protect the passenger from sandwiching between the dashboard and the seat.
sourceofnoise 2 years ago
holy sht
nflpanthersrock 2 years ago
2 words: get owned
CookieMonzta1995 2 years ago
1:33 , Becuase the car isent acually head on!
So why fucking call it a head on crash ?
montystokefaiers 2 years ago
looks head on to me.... how would you describe it?
kellkan69 2 years ago
DAM!!!
RandomPivotMaker 2 years ago
The VOlvo is more solid than a Boomvi
cZ14XpE 2 years ago
...and the tree is more solid than the Volvo. And the rock is more solid than the tree. Were the cars damaged at the crash?
swordfish1986 2 years ago
Once, I've an accident on a Boom W, I've chance to be not dead. In a Volvo, I feel more safe than others cars...
cZ14XpE 2 years ago
ouch..
myPETsnailFRED 2 years ago
bäm
TheKevomatic 2 years ago
just incredible. It sounded like a bomb blast or something. I reckon they should've put crash dummies in the car. We obviously know what would be left of the driver but i would've liked to see what would happen to dummies in the passenger seats.
hrthrhs 2 years ago 3
The problem with accident is the energy that is releasd. Roughly it's (impact = weight X speed.)So The heaviest has more chance to push the other car aside. This increases the time/distance in which it comes to a stop. Result: less G-forces for the people inside leading to theoretical less injury. (This is what airbags do) ONE PROBLEM. the energy released in a big crash is so massive that the car's structure will collaps, crushing everybody inside. At the moment French cars are the strongest
ikbenhetzoergbeu 2 years ago
Not really check out fifth gears volvo 850 vs renault modus. Modus is much lighter but is alot better
wheeliehome 2 years ago
I have to say, you are very smart.
5853599ktm 2 years ago
wooow
ICEMANZIDANE 2 years ago
thats a waste of a BMW...could of just gave it to me lol
skillz03784 2 years ago 7
I Totally Agree
gope9390 2 years ago
omg i drive that bmw
431839221 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
and thats why you drive the biggest vehicle as possible
FordNissanChevy 2 years ago
but a renault megane has a higher safety rating than any suv.
johnmadden1989 2 years ago 4
its all about weight. small vs big head on, its simple really, unless you hit something that wont move, then you got problems
FordNissanChevy 2 years ago
This is true. But, for example NCAP ratings is defined as impact with a similar size car. This does not tell you the story when hitting a larger car.
LasteroBlue 2 years ago
Wasn't that Quintin Wilson at the beginning?
dennieb1 2 years ago
yeah, tiff and quentin left or got sacked from top gear and formed fifth gear i think, was ages ago
ninteh 2 years ago
What happened with Quintin actually, i can't find anything about his further carreer
dennieb1 2 years ago
This is a pretty good example of what could happen on a Canadian freeway, as most of Canada's highways allow you to drive minumum 40mph and maximum 75mph slightly faster than the teast in this video. I think this video reminds us to think twice before turning into the passing lane.
luyuan20 2 years ago
Useless test - in a modern car you'd also be killed because of the immense deceleration forces at these very high speeds.
Your corpse might look better because of the airbags, but you'd still be dead.
dvanderp71 2 years ago 3
its showing you what would happen if you crashed at these speeds which on uk roads is entirely possible
voiceofreason2008 2 years ago 3
no one cares just wanna see carnage..
rangerocker 2 years ago
thats cool and i love that the number plate said 'tiff'
510markman510 2 years ago
holy crap i wish i had that kind of remote control car
sethnab 3 years ago
Sounds like a bomb going off.
millyb1983 3 years ago
seen it yesterday! lets chat
i cant watch this video wK
123193 3 years ago
Was that a 740 or a 940?
alemag87 3 years ago
940
Lillie1986 3 years ago
chilling.
matoy77 3 years ago
how can they have that many cameras and yet they still couldn't manage to capture a good view of the collusion (this is just purely opinion)
hipvspec 3 years ago 3
In march, I had a head on collision at 55 mph each head on when someone swerved into my lane. I was in a volvo s40, he was in a 4 door wrangler. I had a shattered femur, ruptured spleen, fractured skull, 4 broken ribs, head lacerations, and a grapfruit sized open wound on my leg. I was in the hospital for 5 wks. It was bad, but I think the volvo kept me from dying since his car outweighed mine by a full ton. He was fine...douche.
khasperg 3 years ago 17
That sounds bad! I wish you good health in the future.
paganizondafr 3 years ago 14
ha my brother has a volvo s80 and im gettin a 2 door wrangler....i just found it funny...........but the s80 actually weigh more than the wranglers...im guessing the s40s dont
Bassmasta94632 2 years ago
sorry i don't get why what you said is supposed to be funny o_O
bixxius 2 years ago
ehh kinda...i just found it funny in my own life...you dont have to laugh....it was amusement for me and if i spelled anything wrong i am sorry
Bassmasta94632 2 years ago
very intresting
minibus9 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
BOOOO fifth gear stinks!
TOP GEAR rules!
grahamboy1010101010 3 years ago
I agree
Djjaddy2009 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
┗┫━━ ┃ ━━┣┛ ┣┫copy and paste if u wanna ┃ ━━━━━ ┃ ┏┳┫┣┳┓ ┗━━┳━┳━━┛ ┃ ┃ say fuck u to this
━━━━┃ ┃ ┗━┳┳━┛
━━━━┃ ┗━━━━━━┛┃video maker!
baustelac007 3 years ago
The back seat did allright, no?
affsuck 3 years ago
You would still be dead regardless. Your internal organs would literally rip from your body in a fraction of a second.
Wallenstein 3 years ago 7
What did they expect! Its going to hurt. Just dont drive at some doing 60mph. simple.
monkeybusiness124 4 years ago
I love the sound of that old BMW straight 6, 12 valve engine being worked like at 00.55!!
e34king 4 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT A LOAD OF DOG SHIT. BOLLOCKS.
balldabag 4 years ago
I think you've commented on the wrong video!
hrford 4 years ago 2
this show just seems so cheesy, poor quality
LivingDorian 4 years ago
Holy Fcuk Batman thats one bad ass accident!!
DPOC1234567 4 years ago
....and the motto of the story is; dont crash head on at 60mph, And if you do, do it remote control style! lol
darkeneddreams 4 years ago 6
the bimmer demolished the volvo=D
KingCyrisus 4 years ago
it all depends on the type of car. prince naseem survived a head on crash wivut a scratch. he was driving a mercedes slr while the other driver was driving a ford and he suffered multiple broken bones in almost every major part of his body.
AMAGILLSON 4 years ago
I done that a few years ago. Smashed head on. Lost my license for 3 years and only got away without Jail because, and i have no idea how, no one was badly injured!!!!
I'm telling you, its not worth over taking those sunday drivers, sit back, chill and take your time people!!!
medlgr 4 years ago 4
thats the last time i speed, i swear to god when i saw and heard that impact it sent a shiver down my spine, SCARY SHIT MAN, WAKE UP CALL!!!!!!
prettyreshma 4 years ago 8
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Bullshit at 100mph you feel awesome and super power! Faster you go less pain you feel on impact.
speedinginmyporsche 3 years ago
I'd rather crash at 30 than 60.
whattheheck1000 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Really? Because i'd rather crash at 60.
Idiot.
Jlowe110 2 years ago
Look what happens at 60? Instant death.
At 30? Minor injury at most.
whattheheck1000 2 years ago 5
Lol, I meant that's common sense. Of course, everyone would.
Jlowe110 2 years ago
doesn't everyone die instantly? one moment your alive, the next dead? lol
rjattack19 2 years ago
I'm 16 and would rather live through a car crash.
whattheheck1000