Added: 4 years ago
From: tobyw87
Views: 1,873
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (29)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Kent Hovind makes several mistakes not the least of which is combining facts with fiction. The danger in doing this is that it jeopordizes his main agnenda of coverting people to faith in Christ. Hie risks much in this approach and it could be said that he is the working working in conjuction with "negative" forces. What better way to hurt Christianity than to profess to be of faith yet portray your postion in part with inadequate and false information. The informed person will turn away.

  • This is actually part 2.

  • who ever made this set of vids should just keep your opinion OFF the , it spoils the objectivity.

  • ...right about what?...

  • nope

  • read a book

  • Creation Theory is Parsimonious. It offers nothing. It is like stating "god causes cancer" well, that may or may not be true BUT IT DOESN'T HELP PEOPLE WITH CANCER OR THOSE TRYING TO CURE IT!

    Stop being afraid of a death where you exist no more. It is the most likely outcome!

  • I think anyone with half a brain can clearly see that Hovind did indeed get owned.

  • @3gdosrsfs agreed, he also stopped hovind from using an analogy, yet he did it and when hovind pulled him on it he said it's ok for him to do it..... the guy IS taking leaps of faith when he say's dragon flies, can be connected to platypus, were is the evidence, science is supposed to have some, before going around saying a whale evolved from a cow...(another evolutionist in another video)

  • Because Hovid doesn't understand what a proper analogy is. Hovind was comparing 2 completely different things. He compares a dynamic system (life) with a known static system (machines/buildings). It's obvious that's faulty parallelism.

    The grad student was making an accurate analogy. He said we don't have to see something directly to prove that it's real and then when on to state other things that we can't see that obviously exist, like electrons, and the nuclear fusion of stars.

  • People out there actually think those parts of genesis and such are real? Even high school level religon class teach that it is only meant to be interpreted symbolically.

  • How is evolution supposed to be interpreted?

  • Why do people think evolution automaticly disproves any idea of god?

  • These people dont understand what they're arguing against.

  • believing in evolution won't stop a man from being judged upon death. Jesus Christ is the only way.

  • @AbijahMichael so, believe this one thing, or rot in a burning torture for eternity? hmmm...sounds fair.

  • evolution can't be proven. the evolutionary theory constantly changes and is constantly proven false. evolution is based on faith and ignorance.

  • Comment removed

  • Martin as I said before sounds like a fool, and seems like he is arguing over alleged contridictions that Hovind proposed....

  • this was very enjoyable to see Kent's ignorance in the basics of evolutionary biology displayed.

  • =) i really enjoyed these videos. Kent just gets domonated over and over and over again. I shows so clearly his stubbern ignorance.

  • I am not sure what Martin's background his but I agree he is pretty good. :) As far as I know he's a graduate student studying evolution in Sweden originally from Canada. I posted the link of his channel up on the right. :) Kent Hovind can suck monkey nuts! :)

  • martin, what is your background......field of study, age, level of education, etc.

    AWESOME video........kent hovind is the biggest liar!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more