Ok, on the earlier video of log differentiation, you said variavle raised to a variable is a good indicator that you use this method. Would you say if there is a lot of functions together is when you use this. It looks like you could do this without using log diff, but you would have to do chain rule and power rule a whole lot
honestly calc textbooks r so vague and not clear, its like they assume u already know calculus which destroys the whole point.... Professors are even worse, they assume u mastered implicit differentiation on day one of starting the topic, WTFFFFF. U on the other hand are god, i watch your videos once, maybe twice and i just get ittt.
@patrickJMT I think that you made a mistake in your use of the natural log properties. you got ln(sinx)^2 +ln(x^3+1)^4 -ln(x+3)^8. Wouldn't it be (ln(sinx)^2 +ln(x^3+1)^4) -ln(x+3)^8? because the numerator is a quantity of 2 terms and the denominator is 1 term and you would only split up the numerator AFTETR you split up the denominator? wouldn't the extra set of parenthesis around the split up terms of the original numerator be necessary because of algebra rules?
@ac7491 it would be the same because of the logarithmic properties. It is understood that ln(something) + ln(another) terms are on the numerator and anything with - ln(anything) is on the denominator because of what the properties of logarithm states. Thus, extra ( ) is not necessarily needed.
I can't find any video of integration with logarithms, could you do one please? :)
iiottoii 2 weeks ago
@iiottoii look at ' integration by parts ' examples
patrickJMT 2 weeks ago
God bless your soul :)
OhHiMeMatt 2 months ago
Ok, on the earlier video of log differentiation, you said variavle raised to a variable is a good indicator that you use this method. Would you say if there is a lot of functions together is when you use this. It looks like you could do this without using log diff, but you would have to do chain rule and power rule a whole lot
simp12522 3 months ago
honestly calc textbooks r so vague and not clear, its like they assume u already know calculus which destroys the whole point.... Professors are even worse, they assume u mastered implicit differentiation on day one of starting the topic, WTFFFFF. U on the other hand are god, i watch your videos once, maybe twice and i just get ittt.
dpetrosiann 4 months ago
nvm im an idiot lol
deadprisoner18 4 months ago
how come the derivative of sinx is cosx, and in other videos its -cosx
deadprisoner18 4 months ago
@patrickJMT I think that you made a mistake in your use of the natural log properties. you got ln(sinx)^2 +ln(x^3+1)^4 -ln(x+3)^8. Wouldn't it be (ln(sinx)^2 +ln(x^3+1)^4) -ln(x+3)^8? because the numerator is a quantity of 2 terms and the denominator is 1 term and you would only split up the numerator AFTETR you split up the denominator? wouldn't the extra set of parenthesis around the split up terms of the original numerator be necessary because of algebra rules?
ac7491 5 months ago
@ac7491 it would be the same because of the logarithmic properties. It is understood that ln(something) + ln(another) terms are on the numerator and anything with - ln(anything) is on the denominator because of what the properties of logarithm states. Thus, extra ( ) is not necessarily needed.
LeeRyuuji 5 months ago
In the beginning of the problem could you distribute the 4 and 8 to simplify earlier on?
MODxMEx47 8 months ago
U the man!
Jac0b130 10 months ago
that was perfect
71nilufar 10 months ago
holy this is college???
dajakesta1234 1 year ago
I like it. Boosh!
sillymonkard 1 year ago
thank you so much! :)
greenliciousable 1 year ago
you somehow managed to make me LOVE LOGS
guitarjaws 1 year ago
Bravo, simply amazing!
tavito92 1 year ago
thanks soo much,,your amazing... sir,
lebgang 1 year ago
I find it odd that after my calculus class in COLLEGE, I still get more help from you.
THANK YOU, from the bottom of my textbook.
Jonathanws18 1 year ago 12
@Jonathanws18 ha, no prob : )
patrickJMT 1 year ago 2
@Jonathanws18 That $400 textbook they told you had to buy but ended up only opening it up once that semester?
LoganBlackP 2 months ago
this was so helpful.. thank you so much!
kaity826 1 year ago
thanks so much!!
purplepick1 1 year ago
LOL!!! That's What She Said @ 4:33
adamel313 2 years ago 14
thank you, you're amaazing!
p3destrian 2 years ago
Thank you so much. This is going to help me a lot on my tomorrow's test. :D
keitsumi 2 years ago 15
Comment removed
hannahb0 2 years ago
this video really helped, especially when you explained the part at around 2:29
1a1a2a3a 2 years ago
thank you soooooo much. you are awsome! :) :) :)
utuber6600 2 years ago
thanks, much appreciated.
ryankaplan 3 years ago