conspiracy theory did we land on the moon part 2

[MrChris6676]

To pretend that usa made it first..

[danostorme]

at 7:47 who was filming the lunar module taking off?

[ElliotJMusic]

ok, why would  the goverment even lie in the first place about landing on the moon?

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@TheBoylansean Thats bogus.  I dont see a curved background

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@TheBoylansean Helicopters dont use rocket engines to land for one thing. Do you even know what you're talking about?

[Elementer117]

Neil is a beast, he ejected right before the shit blew up.

[SUNNYRAINWIND]

Its funny how most of the time it looks like there is a green screen behind them playing a movie.

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@SUNNYRAINWIND Funny how most oeple who say "green screen" have never worked with one a day in their life. ;)

Well I DO work with chroma key, and this doenst look one thing like any of it. THe opinion of inexperienced newbs are invalid

[SUNNYRAINWIND]

@SpreadingtheMuse You know what is even more funny? morons like you who think they know things about people just because they read a comment on youtube. Good day sir!

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@SUNNYRAINWIND Well if you DO know about greenscreens then you would have said so, wouldnt you? ;)

No, I pegged you dead on. Another amatuer newb mouthing off about what you have no idea. If you do know anything about greenscreen, if you've spent even 60 seconds working with them, then tell me right here and right now. Else I'm standing by my assessment of your ignorance.

[SUNNYRAINWIND]

@SpreadingtheMuse I never said I have used one of lead people to believe I have. What I said was simple, "Its looks like a green screen" that is all. If I see a hot girl on TV and than go outside and see a girl that looks like her and say "she looks like that girl on tv" I would not have to have slept with her in order to see they look alike. It looks fake so it might just be fake.. like if does girls look alike.. they could be the same girl. Simple ..stop making it complicated.

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@SUNNYRAINWIND Then lets put it this way. I do greenscreens. I done a hundred hours of greenscreens. I know what to look for that definitely gives away a greenscreen (especially a 1969 one).

And brother, Apollo is NO greenscreen.

[SUNNYRAINWIND]

@SpreadingtheMuse Oh yeah? than tell me than lol. The gov hides all sorts of things from us like the tech we have now to them its really old. The green screens you are using now are but a shadow of what they have.. but! they could have always used something really cheap since it looks really fake.

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@SUNNYRAINWIND PLEASE PLEASE tell us all about the tech the gov "hides." What tech? That does what? Or are you just pulling all that out of your ass? ;) Using one dork conspiracy as proof of another dork conspiracy only proves how desperately stupid BOTH your ideas are.

A greenscreen can only fake so much. There is nothing anyone had in 69 that could fool anyone today. Moviemakers dont say it looks "fake," only conspiratard newbs. I wonder why ;)

[SUNNYRAINWIND]

@SpreadingtheMuse Because the checks the "movie makes" get are writen by the same people who fool the worl everyday and lie to you. Yes one lie leads to another and the dots do connect but hey people are dumb so w/e right? you people deserve what ever it is thats comming next because you are all ignorant and stupid.

[SUNNYRAINWIND]

@SpreadingtheMuse well you know what actually no one deserves bad things to happen to them but! people tend to think this worls is all sugar and rainbows and they need to wake up. Just look around for a change.

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@SUNNYRAINWIND If the world has anything to teach me, it wont come from a fear-mongerijng newb like you. If you dont know what you're talking about, dont whine when you're confronted.

[SUNNYRAINWIND]

@SpreadingtheMuse I know what I am talking about and I am not "fearmongerijing". People who decide to not have an open mind tent to look at people like me and compare them to the fear monger Alex Jones.. he is joker and thats all he is I dont go by what he says he is there to fool the american people and make the truth and anyone who goes by truth seem like a loon. I am done with this have a nice life.

[lgosk]

Hi All

NASA was and has been on the moon several times in the past it was suppressed to the public, because of what they found everything Nasa sends the public is delayed on the way they are able to filter what they want the world to see , the video is fake, but remember that they were there and what are they hiding for us! I have researched this for many years and have found the answer, it is not hard to see some kind er here, and NASA was banished to visit the moon again ...

[SUNNYRAINWIND]

@lgosk I happen to think the answer to what they found and if they found anything up there can't be found on the internet or any book in our local librarys but in the heads of the "elite" and maybe some documents that we will never see. I seen a special on why pluto was strip of its planet right and they said something about the elite who made the choice and give a few hints. Nova put the film out I believe. But again its like 911 only they really know who did it all we know is that its a lie.

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@SUNNYRAINWIND "open mind" is the first newb cliche by hoax idiots who dont have one. They gullibly believe every hoax webpage they read hook line and sinker. They never double check anything, and get mad when they're refuted.

Dude, there's NO debate. There's no evidence you can name which has never been refuted. I challenge every hoas dummy I can find to name anything at all, anywhere, that has never been proven wrong. NO ONE has ever accepted the challenge. Even they admit they're dumb.

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@SUNNYRAINWIND Dont be a retard about Pluto. Its obvious by your rambling you didnt read one damn thing of what happened.

1) We found objects in our system BIGGER than Pluto. So either they get promoted to planets, giving us 12-15 planets, or Pluto gets demoted.

2) Pluto doenst even have its own orbit, but overlaps with Neptune.

3) It was VOTED ON by international astronomers. Let them do their fucking jobs

4) Who the fuck cares if its a planet? Grow the fuck up

Get the picture?

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@SUNNYRAINWIND Oh no. You're one of THEM. Another 911 dumbass.

Whenever you say "we all know," "we" means "Well I read a dork webpage and with my open mind I gullibly believed every word like a good little sheep." 911 is every bit as stupid as the Apollo "hoax." And you're every bit as stupid for bringing it up. Using moronic conspiracy X as your "proof" of moronic conspiracy Z only proves how desperately stupid your facts are for BOTH. Its just making up your story as you go.

[SUNNYRAINWIND]

@SpreadingtheMuse So you say the events of 911 happen as the "official story" says it did right? than please tell me what you think about WTC7.. tell me how it was possible that a building just fell to its foot print when nothing hit it. I cant wait for your respond this should be good.

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@SUNNYRAINWIND I believe the official story more than I believe the newb ramblings of scientifically illiterate conspirasheep who gullible believe every dumb webpage they read. Yes. The official report is smarter, more educated, more experinced, and more credible than you are

Even bringing 911 up at all is instant fail. You cant use one dumb hoax as proof of another dumb hoax

You dont even know the facts. WTC7 was hit by A THOUSAND TONS of FLAMING DEBRIS. WTF rock were you living under?

[SUNNYRAINWIND]

@SpreadingtheMuse A THOUSAND TONS of FLAMING DEBRIS? LMAO! what is that some kind of summon from Final fantasy or something haha. If "A THOUSAND TONS of FLAMING DEBRIS" can make a building fall to its foot print which left many who do the demolition jobs in wow mode really works that well.. than why are they spending so much money on explosives to bring down buildings with demolition? why not just use "A THOUSAND TONS of FLAMING DEBRIS" lmao

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@SUNNYRAINWIND I SAW IT LIVE! Everybuilding in WTC 1 and 2s destruction area got blasted with debris, and WTC 7 wasnt the only one that fell. So why was WTC 7 fake but not all the others? You cant pick and choose

WTC 7 is a manufactured complaint made by hoax newbs who've never had a hour of engineering training. Popular Mechanics explained the whole thing from the inside out. Watch their show and point out their scientific errors in logical adult manner, if you even can. ;)

[SUNNYRAINWIND]

@SpreadingtheMuse Go ask Popular Mechanics who writes the checks. When someone who is speaking to you about the truth of 911 and brings up WTC7 what they mean and what i meant is that its the smoking gun. Most people actually believe that the fire from the plane could actually melt the building's core and steel which is impossible. FireFighters on site stated it was burning hot at the site after the towers fell and what seem to be a magma substance was seen and it was burning hot. Explain that

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@SUNNYRAINWIND "writes the checks"  uh oh, its a THIRD fearmongering dork conspiracy ;) Why dont you invent a FOURTH to explain your stupidity in proving your other 3? That'll make you look REAL smart LOL

WTC 7 is the most retarded thing about 911. You've never even SEEN the Pop Mech rebute, so dont be a dumb newb about it. If there's anything wrong with what they said then EXPLAIN IT. The ole "but...but...but...Pop mech SUCKS!" doenst give us faith in your science education ;)

[SUNNYRAINWIND]

@SpreadingtheMuse Well this ends here. Have a nice life trolololololo. Did they not teach you free fall in first grade? Bye bye now. Wont reply to you anymore.

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@SUNNYRAINWIND You will be missed, LOL ;)

Next time, at least pretend to know what you're talking about before making an idiot of yourself. I TEACH physics junior. I've failed 10th graders smarter than you ;)

[SUNNYRAINWIND]

@SpreadingtheMuse Ask the myth busters why they wont touch 911

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@SUNNYRAINWIND Because Popular Mechanics beat them to it. Two hour doc on the History channel with engineers, blueprints, CGI, everything. Mythbusters doesnt want to retread the same ground. That doc is here on youtube, and they go after WTC 7 specifically, showing how stupid any claim of "comntolled" demo is.

The building was shattered with WTC 1 flaming debris for gods sake. How the hell WOULD it have kept standing?

[seatleonish]

they never went it was all a hoax. Special effects will always look out of date eventually. My concern is why they did it. There is something up there that we are not getting to see

[astrophysics03]

@seatleonish We did go to the moon. Can you explain the 810 pounds of moon rocks that were brought by Apollo astronauts? Can you explain the retroreflectors that were left behind on the lunar surface for astronomers to beam light at it? Can you explain the recent images of LRO that show the Lunar modules?

You skip all of the things that make your claim silly, why don't you go back to it, and explain to me all of this?

[arc175]

@astrophysics03 all these people that believe this are idiotic

[SUNNYRAINWIND]

@arc175 believe that the moon landing is fake or the other way around?

[arc175]

@SUNNYRAINWIND haha, my bad. believe that the moon landing is fake

[SUNNYRAINWIND]

@arc175 lol I see cool. Yeah it leans towards fake.

[theoutremerlibrary]

" Take no notice of the man behind the curtain !". - (WELCH)

"They" kill our Presidents , Politicians , Princesses . Send us into World Wars .

No one does a thing but lash out at OUR weaker brethren . COWARDS......

[buglerrollups]

its funny cause i never met a person who thought we went to the moon in the 60's,nowadays you have to be a retard to think we did,just the information about all belts 5 or so miles out is good enough to prove it was and still is impossible.

[harryrudham3]

you cannot hear sound in space its a vaccume... there are no atoms to vibrate. idiots.

[limafilho27]

why theorist only talk about the first landing? i wished they tried to explain every single episode from the 3 season of `Man on the moon`. faking one is easy. faking every time is much more complicated.

[yaser470]

Go to googol earth search for Nevada in Area 51 you will see big white area

What is this?

[marshalllucky]

I do no think these astronats did go to moone, the van halen belt would heve fry them the astronuts, also their is no air on the moone so they would have to take over 36 million liter of the oyxgens just to breeth for the three week it take to get their ;-)

[Mr1963chevy]

i think no dust on the foot or landing pads of the LEM,is proof enough that we DIDNT land on the moon.but they are right to say,there is not just one item that back up proof we didnt land on the moon.america wake the fuck up,they're lying to us,have been for hundreds of yrs

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@Mr1963chevy But everything you said was ignorant. How can there be dust "thrown into air" when theres NO AIR? No air = no air pressure = no billowing. And thats 7th grade science BTW. You gullibly cut and paste talking points from moronic webpages, naively wondering why you're then laughed at.

Theres a reason the "hoax" depends on GEDs and drop-outs for its online presense.

[doh1959]

@SpreadingtheMuse wat you talkin abowt you only no abowt radeachon the spase is a dangerus plase radeachon kils like a mikrawave

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@doh1959 Since microwaves are one of the LEAST common types of space radiation, I think we'll do better than listen to your ignorant rambles, thanx ;)

Especially cause we have no idea what "radeachon" is LOL

[doh1959]

@SpreadingtheMuse radeachon cooks yor beens

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@doh1959 Sorry, didnt understand a word you said ;)

[acanning817]

@SpreadingtheMuse Also, clearly you haven't watched any of the moon landing videos because if you did you would see the dust rising when the astronauts are "running" on the moon. Therefore yes, dust would have landed on the pads of the LEM. Unlucky good effort though!

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@acanning817 NONE of that dust "billows." It flies off in parabolic arcs, impossible in any atmosphere with air resistance.  It doenst puff, doesnt float, doesnt settle. Exact same thing happens with the lander legs. Dust was pushed out and away. Physically impossible to land straight down back on the legs.

[acanning817]

@SpreadingtheMuse " NO AIR? No air = no air pressure = no billowing" then why was the flag waving as if there was air?

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@acanning817 A flimsy piece of cloth attached to a rigid flagpole, all in a FRICTIONLESS environoment. Try to STOP IT from waving. Every vibration, footstep, pounding, or movement would be magnified 100x.

[dalek14mc]

@Mr1963chevy-LOL, you see, you're doing what all good conspiracy theorists do. You're merely taking one piece of the conspiracy and acting like it validates everything that you say. The reasons there appears to be no dust on the foot pads is because most of the dust was blown far away from the craft. Plus, there ARE photographs of dust on the foot pads. Do your research buddy.

[RANDIMHAVOC2011]

feel like punching the guy with the glesses in the head

[SuperTestfreak]

@RANDIMHAVOC2011 violent much lol

[RANDIMHAVOC2011]

@SuperTestfreak think its just people wit glassez in genrl lyk mi boss i wana slap his bald head

[she1973100]

AT ALL IN THE BEST OF GREAT COULD POSSIBLY DESPITE THE VAST ASSORTMENT COULD ARE AND SO ON, NOT TO MENTION AS GOT UNITY TRUE AS IT SOUNDS.

[saifulprefect]

amerika dri dlu menipu

[magisterartium]

Hahaha best troll ever

[jesbascom93]

Can u see stars when taking a picture with a camera? No. Not bright enough. Sound don't travel in no gravity, its a VACUMME!!!! It can't travel. This so stupid after knowing physics....

[MarshallMathersSongs]

@jesbascom93 what about theflag moving with no air

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@MarshallMathersSongs A flag in no air means no friction, nothing to slow it down. TRY TO STOP IT from moving.

[ApostateOfTheDamned]

@SpreadingtheMuse the moon's gravity slowly stops it from moving.

[ApostateOfTheDamned]

@MarshallMathersSongs inertia moves the flag.

[Aunslaught110ihd]

(wwwdot) *before link at the end* From the mind behind The Antichrist Dajaal series, The Arrivals, 13 Masonic secrets and more, presents the highly-anticipated, most ground-breaking series yet, 'The Arrived'. Follow the weekly series at: youtube.com/user/HashemStudios­com

[dunsacc]

bloody GCSE science proves that kaysing is a dickhead

[dunsacc]

wait, i just remembered some 10 year old science... sound doesn't travel in a where ther r no particles, so how the fuck r u gonna hear the engine sound. there is a microphone inside the helmet.... the weight of the shuttle is a 6th of that on earth, so its not exactly a massive landing.. easier to control...

[dunsacc]

if some of the worlds cleverest people had 40 billion dollars to spend on a hoax, im sure they would hav thought of putting stars on the background, stagnating the flag and making a landing crater. kaysing is narrow minded

[TheDeerFolk]

If I were neil armstrong and ifthe moon landing is real, I would cry if i actually stepped on the moon.

[TieFreaty]

@TheDeerFolk I know, it would be a life changing experience.

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@TheDeerFolk

Aldrin took the time to pray to his personal god and take communion while they were on the moon, so does that count?

[LifeofLucidity]

no blast crater because they stop engines before they land when it's deemed slow enought to be safe. There's no air ressistance to make the pod tilt, so once you have it strait on course the small gravity can do the rest.

[MrJohnson142]

I can only hope that some people still have enough sense to realize that America has been sold a troughload of bullshit. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain. Anyone who has any technical or mechanical experience at all can see the truth of this despite the crap that has been spun.

[shaggzm4]

seriously? no sound? The engine wouldn't make sound because in space there is no air so therefore there can be no sound.

[nimblenimrod69]

if you cant make it fake it HAHAHA

[AryanKnight]

-Hahaaaaaaa! -the StarTrek'ies, especially those with a VooDooJoo so-called science-education, are desperately clinging to the LounieLanding-hoax no matter what! Likely also promote the jewHolocaust-lie, and deny the obvious jewZionist 11-Sept.-2001jewZionist attack on the NY/TriTowers! The blatant-hoax of all these issues is so obvious, that it is ludicrous for anyone but an imbecile or a devious subversive agent of the Rothschild/Rockefeller Bank'ster-mafia to be denying/skewing Facts...!!!

[SpreadingtheMuse]

@AryanKnight

"Jew" uh oh. Not only are you a conspiracy spaz, but a petty bigot as well. Pathetic ;)

[SpreadingtheMuse]

Thank god we have retarded hoax newbs to cut and paste "FAKE!" I almost believed an engineer who actually works for a living ;)

[marshalllucky]

the official story has been discredited now with countless discrepancies, can there be ANYONE left who still believes the propoganda?come on wake up it NEVER happened ;-)