I am very happy to see the vidoe after you give this Lecture Series on Finite Element Method by Prof. C.S.Uppadhay Department of Aero Space IIT Kanpur
And what if I choose, for the wrong appliance of R-R method situation presented in the vid, just one term for u^(N)(x) solution so N=1, and those forces are equals? Is RR method good for this situation?
The lectures are well organized and really helpful. For this lecture, I guess maybe I have missed something. At 41:33, the given example was: $-\frac{d^2 u}{dx^2} = 1, u(0) = 0, \frac{du}{dx}|_{x=1} = 10$, and at 45:57, the exact solution was given as: $u_{ex} (x) = 10.5 x - \frac{1}{6} x^3$. But plugging the given solution into the original BVP fails to show that it is a solution. Could anybody who watched this lecture and understand what was going on tell me what I have missed? Thanks!!
Lots of maths , derivations evrything is good. But this is very boring, because what is missing here is the physical interpretation. In between, i feel like to sleep.when he just put something from here to thr. He cld make it short by jumping and correlate repeatadly with system. If u go back to system and show why we want to minimize energy and all stuff more detailed. very interesting. So please show something , wch students can't do self. This equns are explained very nicely even in Wikipe.
I am very happy to see the vidoe after you give this Lecture Series on Finite Element Method by Prof. C.S.Uppadhay Department of Aero Space IIT Kanpur
Ondelendo 1 month ago
Comment removed
Ondelendo 1 month ago
I Love The Video Module 1 Lecture 3 Finite Element Method It Can Increase My Knowledge
bebeheuy 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice Video That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You Module 1 Lecture 3 Finite Element Method
AntoMelta 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I Really Like The Video From Your Module 1 Lecture 3 Finite Element Method
willamricard 1 month ago
Comment removed
willamricard 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Your Video Is Very Useful Sharing Module 1 Lecture 3 Finite Element Method
imegatrone 1 month ago
there is a mistake at the minute 43, in the force matrix
instead of the 31/3 and 41/4 it should be 21/2 and 31/3
that is why the solution is incorrect.
about the mathematical formulation, i think it is very well organized and easy tu understand
caron1984 7 months ago
nice
26parthiban 9 months ago
And what if I choose, for the wrong appliance of R-R method situation presented in the vid, just one term for u^(N)(x) solution so N=1, and those forces are equals? Is RR method good for this situation?
Cerberus204498 1 year ago
The lectures are well organized and really helpful. For this lecture, I guess maybe I have missed something. At 41:33, the given example was: $-\frac{d^2 u}{dx^2} = 1, u(0) = 0, \frac{du}{dx}|_{x=1} = 10$, and at 45:57, the exact solution was given as: $u_{ex} (x) = 10.5 x - \frac{1}{6} x^3$. But plugging the given solution into the original BVP fails to show that it is a solution. Could anybody who watched this lecture and understand what was going on tell me what I have missed? Thanks!!
johnson0451 2 years ago
Lots of maths , derivations evrything is good. But this is very boring, because what is missing here is the physical interpretation. In between, i feel like to sleep.when he just put something from here to thr. He cld make it short by jumping and correlate repeatadly with system. If u go back to system and show why we want to minimize energy and all stuff more detailed. very interesting. So please show something , wch students can't do self. This equns are explained very nicely even in Wikipe.
rammps1982 2 years ago
great....
mohanbochum 3 years ago
i appreciate ur effort...
faisal0077 3 years ago
Great work
KakalikaG 3 years ago
You had better show some simulation using software and show the theory behind it. Only theory part isn't that interesting, it's available everywhere.
mahbub2345 3 years ago
Why would you want to try to do engineering analysis without knowing what's under the hood? It's flat out professionally irresponsible.
mpmcd81 3 years ago 4