I suggest everyone check out Dr. Judy Wood''s new presentation, "Where did the Towers Go?". Very insightful. I've been researching 9-11 since day 1, & you really have to know all the players involved, how they all showed up in different msm studios in less than 1 hr all over the world. Kissinger, jerome Hauer, Ehud Barak, Shimon Peres, Netanyahu, etc. '108Morris108' posted Dr.Judy Woods recent lecture. By how much 9-11 researchers are attacked, is proving 9-11 had a big disinfo campaign.
The plane would have broken apart once it entered the building. The office space in the twin towers was very open-plan, not many walls in the way. So lots of debris would have been able to shoot through the building and out of the other side before the fuel ignited because of the sheer speed that the plane had been travelling at!!
THIS IS NOT A COVER-UP - IT IS A PASSENGER PLANE AND THE TWIN TOWERS - NOTHING ELSE FOR FUCKS SAKE!!!!
@reduolf truth but hey? If the nose hit the concret it would be a liddle bit destroyed. High speed yes but i cant throw a paper through my glass window.
@xXxTh0msenxXx It never hit the concrete core of the building. At the angle that the plane was going out the plane would have slice through the perimeter of the building (steel and glass) and after breaking up, most of the plane's debris would have shot through the office space in the building and as I said, there were no walls in the way, it was very open-plan.
Note the nose exits just before the explosion reaches that side of the building.
@quez76 the plane hit at an angle and the twin towers were built with open plan office structure, no walls apart from at the core. the front of the plane would have flown through this open plan area with such speed that it would have exited the other side, the rest of the fuel burnt inside. the underbody of the plane was dark silver and that's why the nose section looks so dark.
so fuck off you stupid conspiracist, have some respect for the dead instead of making theories against them!!
@reduolf i ask again. so you mean to tell me on this video that looks like a plane to you? and calm down, why you so angry? dont get mad at me, its not my fault this video is a fraud...
@quez76 yes actually it does, it has two wings, a silver underbody, it is shaped like a plane, moving at the correct speed for it to be a plane and it is banking steeply to the left, which is because the terrorist nearly missed the tower and was steering it back the other way, this angle then caused the front of the plane to fly through the tower and out the other side.
PS- i'm angry because i hate conspiracy theorists like you, morons who have ZERO respect for the dead!!!
@reduolf lol, if that looks like a plane to you than you need to go see an eye doctor. just because i say it doesnt look like a plane doesnt mean im a conspiracy theorist. it does not look like a plane, get over it, its not that serious...
I know one thing for sure, the nose would have been the first thing to be destroyed when that plane hit that building so to see a cone emerge the other site can only be a missile, period.
interesting... pretty sure the front of my car could withstand a harder impact than the nose cone of an airliner... don't think it could pass through a building though... can't explain this vid.
pause it at 4 seconds. It is way to pointed to be a plane that just went through a building. The smoke looks like it came out the wrong end first two but I could easily be wrong about that.
Guys, nobody is saying the nose of the real plane came out of the building. Its really quite simple. The nose was the first part of the plane to hit the building. Therefore, the debris from where the nose went into the building will be the first to exit the building. I mean, its not like the debris from where the wings went in will come out before the debris from where the nose went in. Everybody is so into the conspiracy theory that nobody is using logic.
@NYSP22DAVID Logic??? The engines would be the first things to exit the building!
They are the heaviest part of the plane for size and the strongest structure of an aircraft like a 757. Its those who don't believe that there is a cover up who are not using logic!
I don't think it is the nose. I aint willing to start arguments or anything I just think its thick black smoke popping out of the building. Even if it is the nose of the plane it would have exploded because the rest of the plane has already exploded.
The planelikeshape "debris" looks to me from this angle
like a missile punchout/exit. Missiles is not made by hollowed out aluminum,
most use Tungsten/depleted uranium and other heavy metals to achieve this penetration capability. An airplane does not. This is just MY observation of ONE clip. Is there any other clips that record this event for comparison?
Nose in, debris out. If the nose came out then it would have landed in one piece. If it didnt land in one piece then what did it hit between exiting the WTC and the ground for it not to be recovered in one piece? Let me know what you think.
Fuck Iraq! Nothing you do not, you just hurt and killed thousands of people .. You do not have the heart to perform this! My dream was to see one of the twins in the (World Trade Center), when our teacher at primary school told how beautiful it is there, so here now Wedel what I want ...! I see here in NY and especially to the twins ... But now I can look just as shit :'(... For fuckin 'terrorists ... Numi nothing else than to kill, injure, kill !!!:-/:-/:-/... I have no words ... :'(:'(:'(
Nice or saucy .The Luxury Woman Of the Millenium....One of a kind outfits and personality!!! Cuz i am hot and willing to fulfill your wishes. After all life is short, we have to make it good and pick as much fun as we can. come visit me at - FriendlyFlirts _dot_ COM - my user-id there is Kimberly-pqwo chat soon on cam :) xzcndqpmxwjk
OK I GOT ONE BETTER .. look up "what we saw" a google video ,..and "it was a military plane" on utube ,,,2 differant witnesses desrcibe a "HUGE GREY TWIN ENGINE MILITARY PLANE". ac-130? they mess with the image of the craft some times as in this video it looks upside down
timeforbloodywar: A Boeing 767 is not capable of "400-500mph" @ 700 ft. The air is too thick. Check your facts, please.
For someone with a playlist containing 199 "Air Crash Investigation" videos, one would hope that you had at LEAST a rudimentary understanding of aerodynamics, thrust/weight ratio, airframe stress... not yet, eh?
Considering they never explain aerodynamics, thrust/weight ratio, and airframe stress, one who would assume that I would know about that would be a fool. In any event, what are you saying? Planes didn't hit the 2 towers?
tfbw: Forgive me for that assumption. All I said was that a 767 is incapable of that speed at that altitude.
Regarding YOUR assumption: I have no idea what hit the towers, but it could not have been a 767 at "400-500 mph" ("Official" estimates actually put the speed at 500+mph) . Unless the Laws of Physics were suspended that day (which they appear to have been), your statement just doesn't, as they say, hold water.
I didn't make an assumption, I asked a question. And sadly, I know nothing of how the laws of physics affect an airplane's speed at 700ft or any altitude for that matter, so I can't debate with you. To be quite honest, I know very little about the laws of physics.
tfbw: Thank you for being honest. There's no shame in not knowing something, but WILLFUL ignorance (9/11 Commission Report, for example) is inexcusable.
If you'd like to hear testimony of pilots & Boeing engineers regarding the 767, check out pumpitout(dot)com & watch the video. You don't need to watch the whole thing, but you might want to anyway. Or just check out pumpitout's channel right here on YT.
He made all the phone calls so we don't have to. Cheers!
What exactly do you mean by willful ignorance? Just a quick summary: About a year and a half-2 years ago, I believed almost everything, if not everything, that was in that one movie that I can't really remember the name of. It was about 9/11 and how their was supposedly thermite bombs there and so on and so on. Eventually, I watched the debunking videos right here on YT and the first few videos I ignored because I was a bit closed-minded.
After watching a few more debunking videos, I finally accepted that everything I believed was false. Then, I continued digging deeper, only to find more proof that everything I heard in the video was false. That's the end of my little story but I may check out the site. I stopped wasting my time arguing with people over 9/11 because for some strange reason they stop responding after just a few replies to each other and it seems like any evidence shown to them is ignored.
tfbw: Willful ignorance is when someone is aware of something but consciously denies or ignores it. For example: The 9/11 Commission Report which doesn't even mention WTC7, let alone attempt to explain its collapse, or the withholding of ALL video footage from the Pentagon attack (except for 5 fuzzy frames of who-knows-what-that-is). Honestly, are we to believe that the local shopping mall has more security cameras than the Pentagon? Why is this? "National Security"?
I don't say I know what happened, only that what *they* say happened is not very credible. And wouldn't "National Security" be better served by releasing All pentagon CCTV footage, which MUST show a recognizable airplane SOMEwhere?
Or the "crash" in Shanksville, with its conspicuous lack of debris, which looks to me to be nothing more than a smoking hole. Planes don't just bury themselves. Or, if it did, why not dig it up & reassemble it, like any other crash investigation?
So, as you see, I have no answers but more questions.
I, like most, believed the "Official" story for years, and only began to question it after a friend clued me in. Then "The scales fell from my eyes", and I investigated for myself. The deeper I dug, the less it made sense. That governments lie and always have is, to me, a given. Some would disagree, which is their right. All I'm saying is, "Don't piss on me & tell me it's raining".
I haven't entirely read the 9/11 comission report so again, I can't debate about what it says, but I do agree that the lack of debris in Shanksville is very strange. With that said, it wouldn't be the 1st time a plane basically disappeared upon impact. But there seems to be less debris at Shanksville. Look up "Hidden Danger part 1)
And the Pentagon, from what I've heard, has 85 cameras but not many looking at the parking lot. Of course I can't confirm any of that though.
tfbw: Never heard of "Hidden Danger". I'll check it out.
Yeah, 85 cameras seems to be the going number. So were they ALL pointed the other way? It defies common sense, don't you think? And what about the Citgo across the street, and the surrounding hotels? The FBI made the rounds & snatched up all of those tapes immediately. What happened to them? I mean, really. It's like *they* ENCOURAGE people to question it. Maybe that's the best they can do is "lead a horse to water"...?
Seems to make a bit of sense to me. It is just the parking lot although 85 cameras and only 1, that I know of, catching the impact is pretty sketchy. I'm also a bit skeptical of the people saying the FBI came and took their tapes but hearing about this secret CIA program, really makes me wonder. In case you haven't heard about the program look up "Who Was on Cheney's Assassination List?" and "Dick Cheney's "Executive Assassination Ring""
@NYSP22DAVID what ever makes you sleep at night , watch "slavery by consent" and tell me what a conspiracy THEORY that is too . your a slave , your mind is in denial about the reality that is too much for you to handle
I'll tell you what. The one that looks like a slave is you. Your name is IRSFRAUDEXPOSED and you are obsessed with naming everything as a conspiracy. Seriously. The BP oil spill was a conspiracy? You've got to be kidding me. I'm not the one in denial, you are.
But hey, if you want to live in a world where everyone is your enemy, then go ahead. I'm not stopping you. I'll continue to happily live my life.
@NYSP22DAVID happy slave living in denial . the first time in history 3 towers collapse in on themselves from a fire , ( not really because they were all demolished with explosives) oh an ddo some research instead of just sucking up the shit the zionist pump out on the boob tube BP drilled into a know asphalt volcano , any OIL that wasn't red wasnt from that spill, and look up the 79 spill 100 times greater and no shutting down the gulf and putting people out of work ,
Whatever. I'll continue to live my life happily while you live in fear. Do you happen to live in a bunker?
And just to let you know, The Windsor Building had a collapse of 10 stories due to fire alone. Guess what that building was made out of. Steel! The entire building didn't collapse because unlike the WTC, it didn't have the weight of 20-30 stories above the point of fire. Also, an airliner traveling at full speed didn't crash into it.
@NYSP22DAVID GIVE IT A REST MAN , NO I DONT LIVE IN FEAR AN D NO I DONT HAVE A BUNKER , YOUR BEING CHILDISH , a plane did not crash into tower 7 either but the fire crew knew it was being blown up , thats a fact. go ahead and judge people and make fun of thous who think freely , hate arabs for no reason , i understand you atheist cant help yourselves
there are more than 3 nose out shots. there is no exit hole. it sould be it is concrete shaped like the expoding object being forced out the windows. but their is no exit hole. Also, "norman=sweetcream" has "911 was a media job" he shows how the plane went in "chilled out" and then exploded. So, "butter in", "Chilling" and "nose out". Plus a 11 sec' free fall "pancake theory" with no pancakes but lots of batter, but no water, just paper. no desks,no nothing.
I would go with fake video too, the animators must have laughed their asses off when the news broadcast this nonstop after 911 and the public just lapped it up like drooling spastics.
I suggest everyone check out Dr. Judy Wood''s new presentation, "Where did the Towers Go?". Very insightful. I've been researching 9-11 since day 1, & you really have to know all the players involved, how they all showed up in different msm studios in less than 1 hr all over the world. Kissinger, jerome Hauer, Ehud Barak, Shimon Peres, Netanyahu, etc. '108Morris108' posted Dr.Judy Woods recent lecture. By how much 9-11 researchers are attacked, is proving 9-11 had a big disinfo campaign.
MrLads13 3 months ago
Imploding from the bottom???
aaajds 6 months ago
The plane would have broken apart once it entered the building. The office space in the twin towers was very open-plan, not many walls in the way. So lots of debris would have been able to shoot through the building and out of the other side before the fuel ignited because of the sheer speed that the plane had been travelling at!!
THIS IS NOT A COVER-UP - IT IS A PASSENGER PLANE AND THE TWIN TOWERS - NOTHING ELSE FOR FUCKS SAKE!!!!
reduolf 10 months ago
@reduolf truth but hey? If the nose hit the concret it would be a liddle bit destroyed. High speed yes but i cant throw a paper through my glass window.
xXxTh0msenxXx 10 months ago
@xXxTh0msenxXx It never hit the concrete core of the building. At the angle that the plane was going out the plane would have slice through the perimeter of the building (steel and glass) and after breaking up, most of the plane's debris would have shot through the office space in the building and as I said, there were no walls in the way, it was very open-plan.
Note the nose exits just before the explosion reaches that side of the building.
reduolf 10 months ago
@reduolf Yeah i agree. I think it too hat it just was a plane and nothing else.
xXxTh0msenxXx 10 months ago
@reduolf so you mean to tell me on this video that looks like a plane to you?
quez76 1 week ago
@quez76 the plane hit at an angle and the twin towers were built with open plan office structure, no walls apart from at the core. the front of the plane would have flown through this open plan area with such speed that it would have exited the other side, the rest of the fuel burnt inside. the underbody of the plane was dark silver and that's why the nose section looks so dark.
so fuck off you stupid conspiracist, have some respect for the dead instead of making theories against them!!
reduolf 1 week ago
@reduolf i ask again. so you mean to tell me on this video that looks like a plane to you? and calm down, why you so angry? dont get mad at me, its not my fault this video is a fraud...
quez76 1 week ago
@quez76 yes actually it does, it has two wings, a silver underbody, it is shaped like a plane, moving at the correct speed for it to be a plane and it is banking steeply to the left, which is because the terrorist nearly missed the tower and was steering it back the other way, this angle then caused the front of the plane to fly through the tower and out the other side.
PS- i'm angry because i hate conspiracy theorists like you, morons who have ZERO respect for the dead!!!
FUCK OFF!!!!
reduolf 1 week ago
@reduolf lol, if that looks like a plane to you than you need to go see an eye doctor. just because i say it doesnt look like a plane doesnt mean im a conspiracy theorist. it does not look like a plane, get over it, its not that serious...
quez76 1 week ago
I know one thing for sure, the nose would have been the first thing to be destroyed when that plane hit that building so to see a cone emerge the other site can only be a missile, period.
dxvxvx 11 months ago 4
Comment removed
dxvxvx 11 months ago
Das ist alles so lächerlich das immer noch millionen Leute glauben das da Flugzeuge reingekracht sind.
johnnyspacetrip 1 year ago
interesting... pretty sure the front of my car could withstand a harder impact than the nose cone of an airliner... don't think it could pass through a building though... can't explain this vid.
therushfan2112rush 1 year ago
pause it at 4 seconds. It is way to pointed to be a plane that just went through a building. The smoke looks like it came out the wrong end first two but I could easily be wrong about that.
ace1122tw 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DON'T believe every Conspiracy Theory on Youtube.
.
I have just made 5 Conspiracy Videos covering the most controversial events of our times.. With incredible incriminating evidence..
Global Warming, 9/11, JFK, Moon Hoax and The Port Arthur Massacre..
After years of research i discovered, 3 to be TRUE and 2 were FALSE!
Click on ProtectAus to enter a world you never knew existed.
ProtectAus 1 year ago
Guys, nobody is saying the nose of the real plane came out of the building. Its really quite simple. The nose was the first part of the plane to hit the building. Therefore, the debris from where the nose went into the building will be the first to exit the building. I mean, its not like the debris from where the wings went in will come out before the debris from where the nose went in. Everybody is so into the conspiracy theory that nobody is using logic.
NYSP22DAVID 1 year ago
@NYSP22DAVID Logic??? The engines would be the first things to exit the building!
They are the heaviest part of the plane for size and the strongest structure of an aircraft like a 757. Its those who don't believe that there is a cover up who are not using logic!
nuttymanyelismate 1 year ago
It's an airplane. I'm commenting in a cesspool of baboons and apes. Shut up you dopes! Respect the dead! There IS NO CONSPIRACY!
NoogahOogah 1 year ago
Dummes, its a military plane! if you look closely..
IloveIHeart 1 year ago
youtube search
1. September Clues
2. 911 entschlüsselt
3. No Plane
PeterHantsen 1 year ago 12
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't think it is the nose. I aint willing to start arguments or anything I just think its thick black smoke popping out of the building. Even if it is the nose of the plane it would have exploded because the rest of the plane has already exploded.
The1979Warriors 1 year ago
The planelikeshape "debris" looks to me from this angle
like a missile punchout/exit. Missiles is not made by hollowed out aluminum,
most use Tungsten/depleted uranium and other heavy metals to achieve this penetration capability. An airplane does not. This is just MY observation of ONE clip. Is there any other clips that record this event for comparison?
roxxphatcox 1 year ago
Nose in, debris out. If the nose came out then it would have landed in one piece. If it didnt land in one piece then what did it hit between exiting the WTC and the ground for it not to be recovered in one piece? Let me know what you think.
minijimi 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fuck Iraq! Nothing you do not, you just hurt and killed thousands of people .. You do not have the heart to perform this! My dream was to see one of the twins in the (World Trade Center), when our teacher at primary school told how beautiful it is there, so here now Wedel what I want ...! I see here in NY and especially to the twins ... But now I can look just as shit :'(... For fuckin 'terrorists ... Numi nothing else than to kill, injure, kill !!!:-/:-/:-/... I have no words ... :'(:'(:'(
Macek331 2 years ago
bush did all this junk
libnan4ever2007 3 years ago
please provide evidence. thank you
jsmith1257 3 years ago
THAT IS AMAZING
allltheewayy 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice or saucy .The Luxury Woman Of the Millenium....One of a kind outfits and personality!!! Cuz i am hot and willing to fulfill your wishes. After all life is short, we have to make it good and pick as much fun as we can. come visit me at - FriendlyFlirts _dot_ COM - my user-id there is Kimberly-pqwo chat soon on cam :) xzcndqpmxwjk
vinark 3 years ago
OK I GOT ONE BETTER .. look up "what we saw" a google video ,..and "it was a military plane" on utube ,,,2 differant witnesses desrcibe a "HUGE GREY TWIN ENGINE MILITARY PLANE". ac-130? they mess with the image of the craft some times as in this video it looks upside down
IRSFRAUDEXPOSED 3 years ago
-_-' wow good job at taking advantage of confusion..and u said 2? lol 2 witnesses are ur only proof?
timeforbloodywar 2 years ago
bunker busting cruise missle yes, aluminum airliner through a concret and steal TOWER no.
IRSFRAUDEXPOSED 3 years ago 11
lol why do u say no? 400-500mph and u expect a large aircraft to what? bounce off?
timeforbloodywar 2 years ago
timeforbloodywar: A Boeing 767 is not capable of "400-500mph" @ 700 ft. The air is too thick. Check your facts, please.
For someone with a playlist containing 199 "Air Crash Investigation" videos, one would hope that you had at LEAST a rudimentary understanding of aerodynamics, thrust/weight ratio, airframe stress... not yet, eh?
911Checkmate 2 years ago
Considering they never explain aerodynamics, thrust/weight ratio, and airframe stress, one who would assume that I would know about that would be a fool. In any event, what are you saying? Planes didn't hit the 2 towers?
timeforbloodywar 2 years ago
tfbw: Forgive me for that assumption. All I said was that a 767 is incapable of that speed at that altitude.
Regarding YOUR assumption: I have no idea what hit the towers, but it could not have been a 767 at "400-500 mph" ("Official" estimates actually put the speed at 500+mph) . Unless the Laws of Physics were suspended that day (which they appear to have been), your statement just doesn't, as they say, hold water.
911Checkmate 2 years ago
I didn't make an assumption, I asked a question. And sadly, I know nothing of how the laws of physics affect an airplane's speed at 700ft or any altitude for that matter, so I can't debate with you. To be quite honest, I know very little about the laws of physics.
timeforbloodywar 2 years ago
tfbw: Thank you for being honest. There's no shame in not knowing something, but WILLFUL ignorance (9/11 Commission Report, for example) is inexcusable.
If you'd like to hear testimony of pilots & Boeing engineers regarding the 767, check out pumpitout(dot)com & watch the video. You don't need to watch the whole thing, but you might want to anyway. Or just check out pumpitout's channel right here on YT.
He made all the phone calls so we don't have to. Cheers!
911Checkmate 2 years ago
What exactly do you mean by willful ignorance? Just a quick summary: About a year and a half-2 years ago, I believed almost everything, if not everything, that was in that one movie that I can't really remember the name of. It was about 9/11 and how their was supposedly thermite bombs there and so on and so on. Eventually, I watched the debunking videos right here on YT and the first few videos I ignored because I was a bit closed-minded.
timeforbloodywar 2 years ago
After watching a few more debunking videos, I finally accepted that everything I believed was false. Then, I continued digging deeper, only to find more proof that everything I heard in the video was false. That's the end of my little story but I may check out the site. I stopped wasting my time arguing with people over 9/11 because for some strange reason they stop responding after just a few replies to each other and it seems like any evidence shown to them is ignored.
timeforbloodywar 2 years ago
tfbw: Willful ignorance is when someone is aware of something but consciously denies or ignores it. For example: The 9/11 Commission Report which doesn't even mention WTC7, let alone attempt to explain its collapse, or the withholding of ALL video footage from the Pentagon attack (except for 5 fuzzy frames of who-knows-what-that-is). Honestly, are we to believe that the local shopping mall has more security cameras than the Pentagon? Why is this? "National Security"?
(cont)
911Checkmate 2 years ago
(cont)
I don't say I know what happened, only that what *they* say happened is not very credible. And wouldn't "National Security" be better served by releasing All pentagon CCTV footage, which MUST show a recognizable airplane SOMEwhere?
Or the "crash" in Shanksville, with its conspicuous lack of debris, which looks to me to be nothing more than a smoking hole. Planes don't just bury themselves. Or, if it did, why not dig it up & reassemble it, like any other crash investigation?
(cont)
911Checkmate 2 years ago
(cont)
So, as you see, I have no answers but more questions.
I, like most, believed the "Official" story for years, and only began to question it after a friend clued me in. Then "The scales fell from my eyes", and I investigated for myself. The deeper I dug, the less it made sense. That governments lie and always have is, to me, a given. Some would disagree, which is their right. All I'm saying is, "Don't piss on me & tell me it's raining".
Your thoughts?
911Checkmate 2 years ago
I haven't entirely read the 9/11 comission report so again, I can't debate about what it says, but I do agree that the lack of debris in Shanksville is very strange. With that said, it wouldn't be the 1st time a plane basically disappeared upon impact. But there seems to be less debris at Shanksville. Look up "Hidden Danger part 1)
And the Pentagon, from what I've heard, has 85 cameras but not many looking at the parking lot. Of course I can't confirm any of that though.
timeforbloodywar 2 years ago
tfbw: Never heard of "Hidden Danger". I'll check it out.
Yeah, 85 cameras seems to be the going number. So were they ALL pointed the other way? It defies common sense, don't you think? And what about the Citgo across the street, and the surrounding hotels? The FBI made the rounds & snatched up all of those tapes immediately. What happened to them? I mean, really. It's like *they* ENCOURAGE people to question it. Maybe that's the best they can do is "lead a horse to water"...?
911Checkmate 2 years ago
Seems to make a bit of sense to me. It is just the parking lot although 85 cameras and only 1, that I know of, catching the impact is pretty sketchy. I'm also a bit skeptical of the people saying the FBI came and took their tapes but hearing about this secret CIA program, really makes me wonder. In case you haven't heard about the program look up "Who Was on Cheney's Assassination List?" and "Dick Cheney's "Executive Assassination Ring""
timeforbloodywar 2 years ago
@timeforbloodywar
have you found out who financed the alleged 9/11 hijackers? thought not. do yourself a favor.
911reset 1 year ago
@IRSFRAUDEXPOSED
The nose itself didn't come out, the debris from the nose and everything inside the building did come out.
NYSP22DAVID 1 year ago
@NYSP22DAVID what ever makes you sleep at night , watch "slavery by consent" and tell me what a conspiracy THEORY that is too . your a slave , your mind is in denial about the reality that is too much for you to handle
IRSFRAUDEXPOSED 1 year ago
@IRSFRAUDEXPOSED
Do you believe that you are a slave?
I'll tell you what. The one that looks like a slave is you. Your name is IRSFRAUDEXPOSED and you are obsessed with naming everything as a conspiracy. Seriously. The BP oil spill was a conspiracy? You've got to be kidding me. I'm not the one in denial, you are.
But hey, if you want to live in a world where everyone is your enemy, then go ahead. I'm not stopping you. I'll continue to happily live my life.
NYSP22DAVID 1 year ago
@NYSP22DAVID happy slave living in denial . the first time in history 3 towers collapse in on themselves from a fire , ( not really because they were all demolished with explosives) oh an ddo some research instead of just sucking up the shit the zionist pump out on the boob tube BP drilled into a know asphalt volcano , any OIL that wasn't red wasnt from that spill, and look up the 79 spill 100 times greater and no shutting down the gulf and putting people out of work ,
turn off the tv
IRSFRAUDEXPOSED 1 year ago
@IRSFRAUDEXPOSED
Whatever. I'll continue to live my life happily while you live in fear. Do you happen to live in a bunker?
And just to let you know, The Windsor Building had a collapse of 10 stories due to fire alone. Guess what that building was made out of. Steel! The entire building didn't collapse because unlike the WTC, it didn't have the weight of 20-30 stories above the point of fire. Also, an airliner traveling at full speed didn't crash into it.
NYSP22DAVID 1 year ago
@NYSP22DAVID GIVE IT A REST MAN , NO I DONT LIVE IN FEAR AN D NO I DONT HAVE A BUNKER , YOUR BEING CHILDISH , a plane did not crash into tower 7 either but the fire crew knew it was being blown up , thats a fact. go ahead and judge people and make fun of thous who think freely , hate arabs for no reason , i understand you atheist cant help yourselves
IRSFRAUDEXPOSED 1 year ago
there are more than 3 nose out shots. there is no exit hole. it sould be it is concrete shaped like the expoding object being forced out the windows. but their is no exit hole. Also, "norman=sweetcream" has "911 was a media job" he shows how the plane went in "chilled out" and then exploded. So, "butter in", "Chilling" and "nose out". Plus a 11 sec' free fall "pancake theory" with no pancakes but lots of batter, but no water, just paper. no desks,no nothing.
hypnotstcollector 3 years ago
I would go with fake video too, the animators must have laughed their asses off when the news broadcast this nonstop after 911 and the public just lapped it up like drooling spastics.
muckletoon 4 years ago
either a missile or a fake video,
certainly ain't no boeing.
muckletoon 4 years ago
This isn't the only video that has the nose of UA175 exiting the north face. It's also not a missile since missiles aren't THAT big.
MulletManSam 4 years ago 2