Added: 2 years ago
From: SaveOurSovereignty3
Views: 8,087
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (59)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Minute 1:14

    Crazy person alert!! Warning warning!!! Coo coo for Cocoa Puffs

    Even educated people are crazy..

    Is this the VIOLENT TORPEDO OF INSANITY?

    omfg!!

  • Speculate??!!  Evidence for controlled demolition:? Oh REALLY?!! And not a shred of any of that was found in the debris.

    Come on Richard deal in reality not fantasy

  • I don't even know how to respond to this guy. You have got to be kidding me!! And this is the kind of nonsense the Truth movement rallies about. Holds meetings about? Puts people like Richard Gage on podiums to talk about? OMFG!!! Tom Cochrane wrote a song called LUNATIC FRINGE. I think these people need to play it at their next meeting. Scary group indeed.

  • i like how Blancher says that the fire did that to building 7 & then almost in the same breath says you need 100 tons of thermite to bring it down.. well according to his own logic small fires can bring down a building.. so how dose he reason that it takes so much thermite but small fires can do the same as 100 tons of thermite.. HAHA

    and also, ive seen thermite go off before.. it dosent explode conventionaly with a boom that would make a sizemograph go off.. it just burns really hot..

  • Couldn't the evidence of themite be left over from the prior bombing of the WTC in the 1990s? 

  • In Nazi Germany 6 ,7, or8 million Jews, gays, and anti-establishment types were rounded up, put into concentration camps and murdered. It was public knowledge in the german populace, but activism against the state was socially unacceptable and would result in detention. No different than modern day USA. The same state machinery that made it acceptable for a young man to be a guard at a concentration camp therebye assisting and doing his part in the "final solution" is slowly playing out here.

  • The arguement that it would be impossible to keep a planned event such as 9/11 a secret is simply not true. Firstly it is not a matter of keeping the event a total secret. If a few people shout from the rooftops, they are dismissed as loonies. Secondly anyone who questions the state and is able to put forth a viable platform is labeled unpatriotic, and becomes a social periah. If anyone poses a real threat to the state they are imprisoned, or perhaps labeled as anti-social, petaphile etc.

  • blanchard is a lier. he's a shill, payed off i bet, payed off in some way. if someone looked into who he is , his past, and what he has to gain from this . i bet you'd see he's dirty.

  • There are anti-westerners behind the 911truth websites trying to destabilize us! One man is Dewdney here in London Ont. He is a known Pro-Arab fomenting action against the US, Jews, etc to young Arabs everywhereusing the web and articles. Claims no Muslim would committ murder or suicide so everything including roadside bombs, Bali, subways, hotel bombs are inside CIA jobs! What a crock - if you believe him - you HELP him!!

  • @jamesosmar2 rofl. there are millions of regular people also behind "web sites" . Its people like you and your generlizations that kill our mother and her people. WAKE UP

  • @jamesosmar2

    Shill.

  • Hmm at 7:28 he says that's what WAS required to make the building collapse

    Instead of that's what it would have required for the building to collapse.

    I guess this dick learned its hard to remember a LIE

  • I love the fact how the asshole cannot account for the nano-thermite so he just gets the guy to say he's not a "thermite expert" and diverts the fucking point.

    So what, I'm not a thermite expert either. You don't need to be.

    All you need to know is that nano-thermite was found in the dust. Nano-thermite = hi-tech explosive. Nano-thermite = cannot create it fucking self.

  • It's not right to speculate, it only gives these lying fuckers something pointless to focus their attention on for mockery.

    Richard Gage has the right ideas. Just present the fatcs and let the chips fall where they may.

    They can't mock free-fall speed, or nano-thermite, these are fucking FACTS.

  • "Heat and Light"

    What a thing to say at the beginning of this video.

    So its suggested that what we know and tell those who have not woken up yet is a waste of energy?

    How wrong the program makers are!

    They are fooling themselves.

  • Why doesn't little Blanchard FOCUS on WTC 7?

    He does NOT EVEN TRY to explain the fall of WTC 7 which HE KNOWS was not hit by a plane.

    Blanchard the CD expert.

    He doesn't FOCUS on explaining the collapse of WTC 7 because HE CANT ANSWER and of course the new "Harley Guy" is not even TOLD to say anything about WTC 7 because Controlled Demolition is the ONLY WAY this building could have come down!

    Shame on you Blanchard you could at least have TRIED! (maybe he DID suggest damage from the towers)?

  • ..but i digress..the way these programs are produced and laid out has become so well known by the public.

    We the public are not just waking up.

    We the public woke up quite a few years ago now!

    Hence all the comments these posted videos get,good people poking gaping holes in the "programing".

    Give us ALL a break.

    We KNOW 9/11 was an inside job.

    Blimey! I wonder if this will post!!!

  • Our little friend Blanchard eh! He KNOWS so much about demolishing buildings.He KNOWS that a steel framed structure would REQUIRE explosives to bring it down.

    YET!

    Look at his WIDE eyes while trying to tell lies as if to plead to his interviewer "am i doing ok,am i saying the right things in the right way"

    Blanchard is the new "Harley Guy" with his checked shirt and baseball cap! "im just the man in the street just like you,im one of you guys,you can believe ME"

  • Blanchard suggests that many columns would NEED to have an explosive attached to them on many floors in order to bring about the collapse of the building.

    Yet he also implies,that what really brought down the towers was fire,as the gov said.

    As a CD expert,he just put himself out of business!!! LOL

  • he says "independent 911 commission" pff wtf!?

    nothing independent there.

  • Why do people cling to the word "Controlled" demolition. It wasn't going to be believable if it was "Controlled".

    It was done to induce maximum mental trauma, it wasn't meant to be neat at all. They didn't care how much damage there would be to surrounding buildings.

    I think it is a real step forward for this to have reached a mainstream television media. We all know they did it, but for the people who need it to be laid out for them, this will present them with internal question.

    Progress.

  • The mere fact that Blanchard says that they could not be placed there afterwords is a huge clue. It would take DAYS to complete that and is idiotic to even bring such a statement up. IMO

  • btw, this propaganda is waaay late.

    everyone already knows 911 was an inside job.

  • propaganda.

    the truth is so big they have to co-opt it.

    the cell phone calls were sooo fake. The worst acting I have ever really heard..

    all the evidence points to 911 = inside job

  • At 1.38

    He should have showed him the Northwood document, and then asked him again, "tell me an objection"

  • 1:18 A very special cruise missile with nuclear capability (explains the reason for the doomesday planes). Think of very hard stone with armouring and capable of travelling at mach 2.3

  • remember, folks, that all these buildings collapsed in the path of MOST RESISTANCE

  • How do you know it wasn't the path of LEAST resistance?

  • this blanchard is cointelpro trailer trash .... bring him on any patriot talk show and watch him be chewed up

  • So if you don't like what an expert says, you pretend he's not real? That's weak.

  • If Brent is correct, what does that make your views and comments?

    Attack the argument, not the arguer. Brent is a very experienced demolition expert. You should pay some attention instead of smearing him.

    You might learn something.

  • interresting.. Btw anyone up for some dity talk^^ ?

  • Also...

    They are actively recording all voice communications into massive databases.

    This is no secret.

    All you have to do is look up whomever, grab however much data you need to reconstruct their voice, and make them say whatever you want .

    They could do this 20+ years ago...let alone 2001!

  • There could be infinite speculations with regards to matters unknown.

    If does not negate anything just because one can't imagine how something took place.

    Stick to the facts, and what is actually known!

    Classic debunker brain fart thought process.

    It's like saying I can't imagine how chess player XYZ devised the strategy necessary to win a game, and concluding he must have cheated.

    Ridiculous!

  • NY Times reported after 9/11 that the WTC 7 had an operational CIA office which was keeping eyes on businesses. It had to be demolished because they did not have enough time to destroy all the papers and secrets. WTC 7 was empty when it was demolished.

  • Most of the floors were occupied by Salomon Smith Barney (28-45). The CIA was floor 25 and only floors 14-17 were vacant.

    Don't confuse your speculation with fact. Get your facts right and you might start making sense.

  • look mr reporter at your own face when you get an honest answer about speculation, an insult reporters hate the most because they know ITS TRUE!

    you don't look so happy mr reporter

  • brent, you admit you aren't an expert on thermite, but then go on to estimate how many tons of regular thermite would be needed? makes zero sense but ok. we are looking for nano thermite not regular, FOOL!

    7:00 "takes time and many people to place explosives" you are right brent. what a perfect opportunity for Bush's brother (in charge of all security @ WTC) to have days were no one is in the building, NO ONE. there was plenty of time because the guards made time. ALL FACTS!

  • Wait. Is Richard Gage and expert on thermite? uh, no.

  • who said he was?

    I beleive he has read more information on the subject and is more experienced on thermite then the fool in the video HANDS DOWN but no one is claiming richard is an expert on thermite. in fact if you have looked further then you have you would realize its not thermite that is important, a clear point you obviously missed. what is? NANO thermite, and for that there are only a HANDFUL of people in the world, NIST has 2 of them IMAGINE THAT! nothing reported on it either FAIL

  • If expertise in thermite isn't important, then why make such a big deal about Blanchard's lack of expertise, and why keep arguing (without evidence to back it up) that Gage knows more about it?

    Make up your mind. You are trying to argue contradictory points simultaneously!

    And in terms of nanothermite, you're now trying to smear NIST. The truth is NONE of the 9/11 'truth' researchers are experts in nanothermite either.

    Nor did they consult any experts, they read a few papers, that's all.

  • Now you're making huge leaps of myth that somehow NIST people were responsible for the attacks, because a few scientists contracted for NIST have expertise in nanothermite.

    Do you realize how silly and empty that argument is? All you do is smear the people without presenting any evidence they've done anything wrong.

    That's not very honorable.

  • The other thing that makes you very objectionable is your characterization of Brent Blanchard as a 'fool'.

    On what grounds do you call him that name? Because you don't like that he's not a truther? What if he is correct and you are wrong? Are you man enough to accept that reality?

  • 6:13 he's right, they never tested for thermite. and by they I mean FEMA the original agency hired to report on 911. FEMA if you read the report, was TOLD not to search for thermite, and instead the researching sci asked and suggested a search be done on this exact subject. all their requests were DENIED mr reporter! and because they made those requests when specifically told not to look for thermite, FEMA was fired and NIST was hired, remember mr reproter?

  • Planes planes and more planes. I've seen no evidence of planes, just hearsay.

    The plane myth supports the trusting media myth. If there were no planes the media could never be trusted to bring you the truth.

    Pay attention Winston, when the lies become truth the party is in full control.

    We are allowed everything all the time. This liberal dialog gives us the illusion of choice.

    The truth will never be broadcast on the tell lie vision. We can say anything we want, it won't make the news.

  • Look deeper people...

    This broadcast is another diversion.

    South Tower Anomalies III

    - Addressing the Debunkers

    /watch?v=rh7cKDXnS_s

  • Anyway. i think this program is BS anyway. Very narrow coverage as far as i am concerned, Not enough people interviewed. What about the french tv program on this? and how many buildings that jew guy owned? how many did he insured against terrorist attack, whats the added premium? did the previous owners insured it against terrorism? how many big buildings in NY is insured against terrorism? there's a number of demolition experts from all over the world, and they interviewed the 1 guy they hired.

  • The deomlition expert knew...immediately...that this couldn't be a controlled demolition. LOL!

    First, strange thought to have at the time.

    Secondly, he knows it can't be...but he hasn't looked at or heard, any of the evidence, on the day. So, how could he know for sure, on the day?

    He's an odd man, this fellow; all presented in his baseball cap and shirt, no tie...just like joe average...trust me, type. As in, I'd never lie to you; in his best awe shucks, manner.

  • Exactly what i was thinking when i watched our little friend Blanchard earlier tonight.

  • Hey thanks for the uploads. Any chance you can provide a high-resolution download version of the WTC7 footage shown here at 03:26? That would be great.

  • I'll second that. A best possible quality copy of that WTC7 clip would be very useful. Don't mind a big download, even raw RGB :)

  • ill get around to it tonight, ill post it in the description for whom ever wants it later

  • That is great, thank you so much man!

  • Get out of here you jew apologist. Like it or not, jews are behind all wars. The 5 companies that own all american media, are all owned by jews......

  • "Jews are behind all wars.."

    You silly fuck wit, don't be so stupid and grow up.

  • Silverstein made HUGE profit as 7 weeks before the attacks he insured the leased asbesto laden buildings ( which he was informed needed to be corrected soon at 200 million repairs ) against terroists attacks. Each building insured seperately just weeks before the attacks. Insured for 3.2 billion and may collect up to 4.6 billion siding EACH building is seperate in attacks. Where else can you invest 124 million and get returns like that ?

    So much evidence one would have to be a fool not to see

  • 911 was obviously a inside job!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more