amazing research. he stated himself that it's uncertain weather the 2 fluid model is correct or not. the answer has been uncovered in more recent years being magnetic drag.
Ok lanpfisher ---- Your point is somewhat correct. Even though vacuums are added to keep molecules from reaching a container, no vacuum is perfect. So.... molecules (other than the substance trying to be cooled to absolute zero) are still floating around.
Okay, this isn't correct. I realise it's old but it doesn't flow through the glass/ceramic, it flows over the outside surface of the container, which I think is possibly even more incredible.
Ok....let me state why absolute zero just isn't possible. It might be a theory, but it's one thing mankind will never achieve. Just because we have gotten close, doesn't mean that it's going to happen. There will ALWAYS be a small amount of vibration in an atom. The reason why it will not reach absolute zero is the atom is surrounded by air that is constantly warmer than the atom itself. So THEORETICALLY.... we aren't close at all.
You aren't taking into account vacuums around the container. However you're still right, in the event you try to thermally insulate through a vacuum the minor radiation heat increases will result in vibrations of the atoms.
thats the only reason i learn anything, in a way, is to feel more stupid. its a nice feeling to know eveyday how mysterious the world actually is. i like feeling small and ignorant.
yeah i dicided to find out one day after someone thought i was a genius and then i realized i was wasn't, they were just really stupid. i really do hate modern psychometrics, they know so little about intelligence. richard feynman had an iq 123, he was brillant. to bad people actually think IQ means anything.
well IQ test are a bit of a lie. Most IQ test use a lot of english, word associations and other things which normally require prior knowledge. So to say that they are measuring intelligence is a bit of a stretch. Also it does not represent the persons individual areas where they are possibly superior in. Most iq test, for example, do not accurately judge mathematical abilities. The tests however do have a good probability of being fairly accurate though in most cases.
so are you one of the many wackos on the internet. You seem like you suffer from major insecurities because you feel threaten by someone intelligent. That was by far one of the weirdest comments someone has ever said to me. You are a very unhappy individual.
But if Liquid He II has no entropy, then that means that liquid he I, which has entropy, and the heat, makes the entropy DECREASE instead of, in accordance to the second law of thermodynamics increase. AKA their solution still breaks the second law.
At Absolute Zero the laws of physics would have to break down due to all motion stopping (theoretically)...We'd obviously see some of those effects near those extreme temperature changes...
The second law is consistent ONLY when a system AND its surroundings are both considered. The second law concerns only NET entropy. so if the entropy of LHe2 (II) drops, the entropy of the test of the universe increases by enough for the total to be more than zero
"He(1)"? If you are refering to "helium-1", that doesn't exist; the name of that isotope is hydrogen-1 (hydrogen with no neutron). Wikipedia has a table of isotopes for you to browse through - maybe it'll help you understand: /Table_of_nuclides_(complete)
BTW, if you have to post arrogant comments, you should consider propper spelling and syntax.
it is actually amazing. In the last days I´ve found so many things I cant stop cuestioning myself about them and how they break our conception of the world.. its amazing.
Liquid He is a SUPERFLUID and not a SUPERCONDUCTOR. Those two things are completely different and not related phenomena. The thing which happens to be true about both of these two phenomena is that they both happen to occuroccur at low temperatures.
Although this is an old video, it all seems really groundbreaking to me. I mean, superfluid contains no heat thus there are no molecular movement, although the substance still exists.
This means that thermal movement is different from atomic movement. Molecules wont bump to each other at all, they are completely static in superfluid. But in order for the substance to be itself the atoms must still consist same nucleon. If this wasn't the case, E=m(c*c) wouldn't apply. I need to think more!
A response from Dr. Leitner himself: The words "a body contains no heat" no longer make sense, and the fact that I use this old fashioned term in the script of my movie has been justly criticized. The term which should be used is "internal energy" - such as the ("kinetic") energy of motion a molecule, and the ("potential") energy stored in a pair of molecules if they move apart from each other against the force between them ...continued in next comment.
...because all molecules attract each other (some more than others - and Helium atoms do this very weakly). A comparison can be made to a spring holding them together; when they move apart some of their energy of motion is stored in the stretched spring and they slow down as they move apart...
..."Heat" is simply "internal energy" possessed by the atoms in one body which will be transferred to the atoms of another body when this other body is in contact with the first and is AT LOWER TEMPERATURE, thereby increasing the internal energy of this "other body"...
...There is no simple "intuitive" way to explain what happens to Liquid Helium below the Lambda point. It has to do with Quantum Mechanics, which requires that atoms occupy separate, definite energy states. Energy states between the definite ones are not allowed, do not exist. And there is one and only one energy state, the state of lowest energy, THE GROUND STATE.- STATES LOWER THAN THIS ARE IMPOSSIBLE...
...Below the Lambda point of about 2.2 degrees Kelvin a certain percentage of Helium atoms are already in the "ground state", incapable of losing the energy they possess by contact with a "cooler body" because a lower energy state is impossible. In other words the INTERNAL ENERGY THEY POSSES IS NO LONGER THERMALLY AVAILABLE. As the temperature of Liquid Helium is lowered, more and more this percentage of ground-state atoms gets bigger and bigger.
@Humidi e=m(c*c) applies on einsteinian scales, and means nothing on newtonian scales, and doesnt practically apply at quantum scales. that is the issue we have here. the disparity breakdown between newtonian scales and quantuum scales is kinda sorta forshadowing itself here.
and to think there are two more of these clips in the movie!! i got a boner ...
@Humidi No, it has heat. If it had no heat, it would need to be at absolute zero [0 Kelvin], which is theoretically possible, but has not been obtained in a controlled setting.
i cant work, my glasses? where was it
pinalo2009 2 weeks ago
amazing research. he stated himself that it's uncertain weather the 2 fluid model is correct or not. the answer has been uncovered in more recent years being magnetic drag.
phaselapsecore 1 month ago
i want to drink it
conciousness88 6 months ago
is liquid helium 2 a bose-einstein condensate?
thepcguy01 6 months ago
Ok lanpfisher ---- Your point is somewhat correct. Even though vacuums are added to keep molecules from reaching a container, no vacuum is perfect. So.... molecules (other than the substance trying to be cooled to absolute zero) are still floating around.
xespguitarsx 9 months ago
Okay, this isn't correct. I realise it's old but it doesn't flow through the glass/ceramic, it flows over the outside surface of the container, which I think is possibly even more incredible.
Ianpfisher 10 months ago
Ok....let me state why absolute zero just isn't possible. It might be a theory, but it's one thing mankind will never achieve. Just because we have gotten close, doesn't mean that it's going to happen. There will ALWAYS be a small amount of vibration in an atom. The reason why it will not reach absolute zero is the atom is surrounded by air that is constantly warmer than the atom itself. So THEORETICALLY.... we aren't close at all.
xespguitarsx 1 year ago
@xespguitarsx
You aren't taking into account vacuums around the container. However you're still right, in the event you try to thermally insulate through a vacuum the minor radiation heat increases will result in vibrations of the atoms.
Ianpfisher 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
prismaticaurora science! 2 1 year agoMayeleventh
6:59pm Tuesday (IST) - Time in Indiasears-Htatek
nmrmak i admire your patience. 4 1 year agoleilaik
6:59pm Tuesday (IST) - Time in Indiasears-Htatek
prismaticaurora science! 2 1 year agoMayeleventh
DoubleDutchBust 1 year ago
i want to see a bose-einstein condensate. maybe a liter glass of the stuff. to bad it is not possible
thesparitan 2 years ago
i once believed i was intelligent
now i do not believe that anymore
zero entropy is beyond me
thesparitan 2 years ago
The more knowledge one gains, the more he realizes he does not know
hat045 2 years ago
thats the only reason i learn anything, in a way, is to feel more stupid. its a nice feeling to know eveyday how mysterious the world actually is. i like feeling small and ignorant.
thesparitan 2 years ago
Yeah, keeps me wanting to continue to learning.
hat045 2 years ago
me too, i only wish i had more brain power to understand it faster. 140 iq doesnt seem like enough, i still get baffled by some of the stuff i read.
thesparitan 2 years ago
lol you know your iq thats nice.
hat045 2 years ago
yeah i dicided to find out one day after someone thought i was a genius and then i realized i was wasn't, they were just really stupid. i really do hate modern psychometrics, they know so little about intelligence. richard feynman had an iq 123, he was brillant. to bad people actually think IQ means anything.
thesparitan 2 years ago
well IQ test are a bit of a lie. Most IQ test use a lot of english, word associations and other things which normally require prior knowledge. So to say that they are measuring intelligence is a bit of a stretch. Also it does not represent the persons individual areas where they are possibly superior in. Most iq test, for example, do not accurately judge mathematical abilities. The tests however do have a good probability of being fairly accurate though in most cases.
hat045 2 years ago
your so coool man. You are amazing. I love how you non-chalauntley drop a 140 iq in there. Fucking self indulgant fagface
Pskawt 2 years ago
umm ok what ever
so are you one of the many wackos on the internet. You seem like you suffer from major insecurities because you feel threaten by someone intelligent. That was by far one of the weirdest comments someone has ever said to me. You are a very unhappy individual.
thesparitan 2 years ago
This sounds like the Nazi Bell.
Spin up the power and a 2nd superfluid apparatus rotating in the opposite direction and you have..... lift
bada bing....
gavincurtis 2 years ago
Thank you for posting this, Very interesting!!
txfirehawk 2 years ago
But if Liquid He II has no entropy, then that means that liquid he I, which has entropy, and the heat, makes the entropy DECREASE instead of, in accordance to the second law of thermodynamics increase. AKA their solution still breaks the second law.
candlehawk 2 years ago
That's only true for spontaneous processes. As we see from the experiment, the transition from HE I to HE II is certainly non-spontaneous.
Although the transition from HE II to HE I is spontaneous and in accordance to the second law.
Votorx 2 years ago
At Absolute Zero the laws of physics would have to break down due to all motion stopping (theoretically)...We'd obviously see some of those effects near those extreme temperature changes...
agentmabus333 2 years ago
It does have entropy. Only at absolute zero would the entropy be zero and this is theoretically impossible.
Retsam19 2 years ago
The second law is consistent ONLY when a system AND its surroundings are both considered. The second law concerns only NET entropy. so if the entropy of LHe2 (II) drops, the entropy of the test of the universe increases by enough for the total to be more than zero
alexicoff 2 years ago
The theory according to the clip only states that one out of the two thought compunds of He(l)-II has zero entropy etc.
He(l)-I is of no particular interest as it acts like any other fluid.
rmariboe 2 years ago
If you payed attention to this youtube lecture you would no that He(1) only APROXIMATES the properties of fluids. So go FUCK YOUR OWN =) FACE =)
Pskawt 2 years ago
"He(1)"? If you are refering to "helium-1", that doesn't exist; the name of that isotope is hydrogen-1 (hydrogen with no neutron). Wikipedia has a table of isotopes for you to browse through - maybe it'll help you understand: /Table_of_nuclides_(complete)
BTW, if you have to post arrogant comments, you should consider propper spelling and syntax.
rmariboe 2 years ago
talk about spelling... maybe you should learn before you speak.
proper is spelled with one P.
not two.
And for the record, wikipedia isn't always accurate.
XmegaprrX 2 years ago
Well, it seems we both learned something today :)
Wikipedia should never be your only reference, no - but in this particular case, it's accurate.
rmariboe 2 years ago
cool~
Imoccs 2 years ago
The audio is not synchronized - checkout my version, I've properly synchronized the audio and video.
Zantorc 2 years ago
4.2 K? wtf
xnf90x2 2 years ago
-268.8 C
0Krusnik0 2 years ago
K is for Kelvins. 0 Kelvins is absolute zero. In chemistry all temperatures are measured in Kelvins.
mandog2222 2 years ago
yeah i know its such a low temp 4.2 k
xnf90x2 2 years ago
in all science in fact not only chemistry. Kelvin is the SI unit.
avatarelite 2 years ago
Is there a liquid xenon???
aromin25ron 3 years ago
Yes, and there also is solid Xenon. Look it up, for esxample, in Wikipedia.
ale86itn 3 years ago
Comment removed
ale86itn 3 years ago
Helium II may be non-conductive, but what about the (now) supercooled particles in the wood?
jasonguyperson 3 years ago
Did the Helium II experiment show an increase in the speed of the wood paddles (Relative to the Helium I experiment?)
jasonguyperson 3 years ago
interesting, perhaps superconductors were not widely known of at that time
TheCarlez 2 years ago
Zero entrophy?, wow man that´s cool
fabicol2000 3 years ago
Fantastic!
roguehearts 3 years ago
it is actually amazing. In the last days I´ve found so many things I cant stop cuestioning myself about them and how they break our conception of the world.. its amazing.
sebastas2 3 years ago
I'm amazed that one could find stuff this cool in youtube.
murtumaton 3 years ago
What was that powder?
FibonacciPrower 3 years ago
Jeweler"s rouge.
ale86itn 3 years ago
Comment removed
ale86itn 3 years ago
science!
prismaticaurora 3 years ago 4
what happens if u set fire in it or made something explode in that helium
CRAKIZGOOD 3 years ago
lol nothing will happen, liquid helium will turn start to evaporate back into its original state
shenmuere 3 years ago
i thought helium was flammable
CRAKIZGOOD 3 years ago
you're probably thinking of hydrogen.
bmatulis 3 years ago
hmm then why did the zeppelins caught on fire when they got shot with rockets
?
CRAKIZGOOD 3 years ago
because they were filled with hydrogen.
bmatulis 3 years ago
oh strange i thought it was helium
thx for clearing that up
CRAKIZGOOD 3 years ago
you're thinking of helium balloons...which are filled with the gas, not the liquid state, and not the liquid in this video.
cobaltdan9 3 years ago
i admire your patience.
nmrmak 3 years ago 6
@bmatulis funniest exchange on youtube? definitely a contender.
dean0waterz 1 year ago
@CRAKIZGOOD Modern zeppelin aren't filled with hydrogen anymore.
qwasd0r 1 year ago
I am confused about what type of beaker that Helium II is able to flow through... capillaries?? Is it like a ceramic bottom or something??
jayleno0 3 years ago
Yes,it is what's called a fritted disk made available to chemists as superfine filters. Itis ceramic, unglazed.
ale86itn 3 years ago
Not many people get to see Liquid Helium.
pcorf 3 years ago
Why is it said that liquid He is non-conductive? I thought it was a superconductor?
Chadronix 3 years ago
Liquid He is a SUPERFLUID and not a SUPERCONDUCTOR. Those two things are completely different and not related phenomena. The thing which happens to be true about both of these two phenomena is that they both happen to occuroccur at low temperatures.
ale86itn 3 years ago 2
Although this is an old video, it all seems really groundbreaking to me. I mean, superfluid contains no heat thus there are no molecular movement, although the substance still exists.
This means that thermal movement is different from atomic movement. Molecules wont bump to each other at all, they are completely static in superfluid. But in order for the substance to be itself the atoms must still consist same nucleon. If this wasn't the case, E=m(c*c) wouldn't apply. I need to think more!
Humidi 4 years ago
A response from Dr. Leitner himself: The words "a body contains no heat" no longer make sense, and the fact that I use this old fashioned term in the script of my movie has been justly criticized. The term which should be used is "internal energy" - such as the ("kinetic") energy of motion a molecule, and the ("potential") energy stored in a pair of molecules if they move apart from each other against the force between them ...continued in next comment.
bmatulis 4 years ago
...because all molecules attract each other (some more than others - and Helium atoms do this very weakly). A comparison can be made to a spring holding them together; when they move apart some of their energy of motion is stored in the stretched spring and they slow down as they move apart...
bmatulis 4 years ago
..."Heat" is simply "internal energy" possessed by the atoms in one body which will be transferred to the atoms of another body when this other body is in contact with the first and is AT LOWER TEMPERATURE, thereby increasing the internal energy of this "other body"...
bmatulis 4 years ago
...There is no simple "intuitive" way to explain what happens to Liquid Helium below the Lambda point. It has to do with Quantum Mechanics, which requires that atoms occupy separate, definite energy states. Energy states between the definite ones are not allowed, do not exist. And there is one and only one energy state, the state of lowest energy, THE GROUND STATE.- STATES LOWER THAN THIS ARE IMPOSSIBLE...
bmatulis 4 years ago
...Below the Lambda point of about 2.2 degrees Kelvin a certain percentage of Helium atoms are already in the "ground state", incapable of losing the energy they possess by contact with a "cooler body" because a lower energy state is impossible. In other words the INTERNAL ENERGY THEY POSSES IS NO LONGER THERMALLY AVAILABLE. As the temperature of Liquid Helium is lowered, more and more this percentage of ground-state atoms gets bigger and bigger.
bmatulis 4 years ago
@Humidi e=m(c*c) applies on einsteinian scales, and means nothing on newtonian scales, and doesnt practically apply at quantum scales. that is the issue we have here. the disparity breakdown between newtonian scales and quantuum scales is kinda sorta forshadowing itself here.
and to think there are two more of these clips in the movie!! i got a boner ...
paragshah2112 1 year ago
@Humidi No, it has heat. If it had no heat, it would need to be at absolute zero [0 Kelvin], which is theoretically possible, but has not been obtained in a controlled setting.
thedoubler67 1 year ago