Last clip is going at a much faster weight. And remember you weigh about 1/6 of your weight on the moon thats why the astronauts are moving in a different way. Standing on their toes and so on.
@AndyHarglesis are you an idiot? seriously there are pictures of these guys and there equip before they even went on the moon, and theres antennas that were around a foot long? r u that much of an idiot where u cant do ur own research???
In the last scene, the astronaut getting up is holding on to the other astronaut. In my opinion, the moon landings being a hoax is deliberately spread by the Jewish media to discredit other hoaxes about Jews, which are actually true such as the Jews running the economy hoax, the holocaust hoax, the ZOG hoax, etc.
neil armstrong is a lying sack of shit he dialates and lubes his asshole for buzz to fuck him. they were the first men to buttfuck on the moon i hope they die painful deaths
@Shalilify Don't forget how we used HAARP to cause the earthquakes in Indonesia and Haiti and hurricane Katrina. Oh, and how we're joined up with the NWO to do things like spray poison out of commercial jets in order to reduce the world's population by 80%.
When referring to historical events, I wonder why conspiracy theorists almost never mention the Bay of Pigs, Watergate, Chile/Allende, Iran/Contra, etc.
This footage which I don't recall seeing in the other films on the topic, really hit home. Being a trained classical animation student, this becomes extremely relevent to factor this is staged due to the contradicting priciples involved and hilighted so well.
The McCollum memo was first widely accepted with the publication of Robert Stinnett's book Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor. Stinnett presents the memo as part of his argument that the FDR Administration conspired to secretly provoke Japan to attack the US in order to bring America into the War in Europe without generating contempt over broken political promises. FDR had recently issued a campaign promise that the US would not become entangled in Europe's war under his watch.
suggested that the US provoke Japan into committing an "overt act of war". The memo illustrates that the Office of Naval Intelligence promoted the idea of goading Japan into war: "It is not believed that in the present state of political opinion the United States government is capable of declaring war against Japan without more ado [...] If by [the elucidated eight-point plan] Japan could be led to commit an overt act of war, so much the better."
@musicbruv That's just a movie. Your not supposed to see any evidence. These people know what they're doing, they have been deceiving Americans and the World for over a hundred years now. What are some of the other fast ones they have pulled: Bombing of the Maine, Sinking of the Lusitania, Creation of the Federal Reserve(Communist Run Central Bank ), IncomeTax Amendment
WWI, 1929 Stock Market Crash, Hitler's rise to power, Pearl Harbor, WWII.Korean
@musicbruv Well you must be one of those people that actually thinks Obama was born in the USA, Is not a closet Muslim and is not a full blown Marxist, Socialist Communist. Anti? Why don't you and the rest of the " CATTLE " go back to the corral. No no, all of these events just happen by themselves, there is no one behind anything right? Anti? just another Brain Washed Sheep who refuses to question the " Official Story " If you want to begin to wake up try
@JaracaraAsper I dont cars where Obama was born, and things dont just happen by themselves, the Lusitania which you mentioned was a British ship sunk by a German submarine during ww1, dont tell me you think that was a conspiracy!
@musicbruv No things don't just happen by themselves. That's exactly right. Did you also know that the German Government took out full page advertisements in the New York Times warning people not to book passage on that ship as it was also carrying Military Munitions and War Materials.
" IN POLITICS, NOTHING HAPPENS BY ACCIDENT. IF IT HAPPENS, YOU CAN BET IT WAS PLANNED THAT WAY. " Franklin D. Roosevelt
Of course it was also widely accepted that the Earth was flat at one time too.
@musicbruv This happened in 1915. Germany was at war with Great Britain. The Germans gave fair warning to all that any ship flying the British Flag would be a Target.
But this was used as an excuse for America to enter the War. Bit of a delayed reaction don't you think? 128 Americans aboard a Ship carrying Military Munitions. And this was the reason we entered the war?
America was a Neutral Country as well as an Isolationist one. WWI was necessary to demonstrate the need for World Gov't
@musicbruv At the end of WWI the LEAGUE OF NATIONS was formed but still America refused to become a part of entangling treaties with other Nation States. This was the reason so many Countries declared War on each other in WWI. Treaties that stated that they would come to the aid in time of War of their Allies. If you consider that just one man's Assassination in Serbia sparked the entire War, this actually was a valid argument for the US to refuse Membership in the League of Nations.
@JaracaraAsper With the failure of pushing the US into membership with the League of Nations it was determined that another avenue should be implemented. This being the infiltration of the US Government by an Organization that would gain control of Top level Positions within the US State Dept. & other Gov't Agencies. This organization was the Council on Foreign Relations based in NY City, Often referred to as the Shadow Gov't of the USA. Every President since FDR has been a member.
the one and just the one result that proves this was not the 'moon' is the size of the sun reflection in any of the apollo landing videos or pictures. it's just too huge to be a point-source of light at infinity. point-source because different pictures in low earth orbits show up the sun reflection more or less as a dot with spokes. why are there no spokes in these apollo visor reflections?
@21mugen82 -- The thing fell from his belt so fast because the video was sped up by the guy who compiled it to fool you. You can plainly see that he shows you the first part of the scene 3 times and each time he runs it faster. And he only shows you the part where the object falls once.
.
Percy is a liar. But he's not a very good one. His lies are way too obvious for people who actually study his subject.
what kind of wires fucktard...? this man is an idiot.
and how come he knows all the specific aspects of being in such a condition since he has not been there?? the powder fine sand on the surface, the vacuum, the technology level in the 60s of the lenses used in the cameras, the film exposed to such extreme conditions, etc, etc...
a simple reflection of the light from the backpack's antenna to the lense. As simple as that.
@powerfulaid why can`t you see stars, if you are in the city at night, which is full of lights? the sunlight-reflection on the moon-surface is to strong for the camera. There was no way to show the stars because the exposure period wasn`t long enough.
The American tax payer takes it on the chin once again. It was ALL faked because NASA was backed into a corner and couldn't come up with the results expected from all the money they spent.
MOONLANDINGS FILMED ON PLANET EARTH Nasa Fake Apollo Missions Area51 dreamslandresortdotcom LM was a Toy Space Craft no blueprints 4KB ram pocket calculator for a computer No lead shielding 27 layers of gold foil cover RAM 4kBs (combined memory of CSM and LEM computer) ROM 36 kBs Basic machine cycle 2.048 MHz Total memory less than 150 kB or less than a 1.4MB floppy disk
Gemini 6 and 7 managed an orbital rendezvous with no computers at all.
The guidance system on the LM and Saturn V was descended from the same guidance system used in Minuteman nuclear missiles. Those missiles were capable of flying across the globe and hitting a city.
The moon is a lot larger than a city.
This certainly appears to make sense to me. How about you? In the absence of any actual understanding, would you care to simply resort to insults?
I believe people should try to at least study some of the physics and math necessary to comprehend how things actually work before blatantly claiming as undisputable proof that which is only a conspiracy theory. Yes there may be some truth in it, but let us at least consider all the possibilities (and start using more numbers and less adjectives) before jumping to conclusions. All I ask is that people be more humble and well informed (especially in physics) before claiming extraordinary things.
the soviet union's science community were given thousands of photo's, and saw all the videos. They haven't ..NOT ONCE claimed it was fake! and they would've in a heart beat. Theses conspiracy nut are just a bunch of whack jobs! Shame on you! It's un American! Be proud of what your country has done
Did you know the purpose of NASA's moon impact was actually to create a moon crop cirlce to send a message to the returning reptillians in 2012. The message reads "We destroyed the twin towers as instructed, please don't use the Great pyramid of Egypt as a portal again as the undersea cables have been severd. Kthnx Bye, Earth"
@ocseans Holy shit, I was going to have a fun debate with you - but after reading this comment, I realize that I'm no longer having a conversation with a person of even mediocre intelligence. P.S. You're an animation student, that hardly has anything to do with theoretical sciences.
@ocseans My bad, I confused you with oatstao :) I was about to reply to one of his comments, then I seen your one and thought that your comment came from him ha-ha.
this video sucks. Aldrin and Neil Armstrong put mirrors on the moon for laser ranging on July 21, 1969, about an hour before the end of their final moonwalk. We still use them today for lunar laser ranging retro-reflection. How the heck did they get there if we never went to the moon?
Well Russia has reflectors on the moon and they admittedly never went to the moon. We have motorized rovers on Mars, and man has never set foot on that planet.
@MattBeckstrom If you watch the last video carefully, something falls out of his suite to quickly, like a regular rock on earth falling from gravity. This oviousbly means the sped the video up to make it look like he was pulled up by cables. No Conspiracy, no hoax.
@tinyman12323 Again, that is under the assumption that this footage was shot on the moon. If this video was not sped up, then it was obviously shot on earth, since the object fell at the rate of gravity on earth. If I see a NASA video where something falls at the rate of gravity, to me it means that that video was shot on earth. If you see a NASA video where something falls at the rate of gravity, it means that hoaxers have tampered with the evidence. Show me the un-tampered video, then.
I stand corrected, the laser moon mirror project, was used until 40 years after the apollo misison (2009). I am sure there will be independent companies which may use the mirrors for their own studies or data.
what has this clip got to do with van allen or when we plan to go to the moon the 2nd naught is clearly being lifted by wire look at his feet and the way his pants are riding high wake up this is the only proof you need stop trying to dodge the issue with your sudostatistic clap trap.
What's wrong with the 2ft jump? Keep in mind that the calculation of the expected jump height isn't a linear function like "jump height on Earth multiplied with 6"!
do apollogists watch these clips with there eyes shut or are they so tied up in the lie that if one of the naughts started to float 2ft above surface they would have a answer.
Guys, Earth's magnetiv field has been explored with probes, telescopes and other instruments again and again and again and there's really no radiation that can kill a human instantly or in a couple of hours or causes significant lasting damages. Read peer reviewed articles about the topic and learn for yourself.
You are so nieve if people really had gone to the moon then they would have started colonising it. No one has ever even been into space. All the rockets were EMPTY of people. Its just an orchestrated hoax to make people beleive in 'the superpower'.
Yeah america is going to start colonizing it in 2020 NASA simply didnt have the money or the tech to set up a permanent moon base at the time. Whats your proof?
@horseburger That's the most ridiculous thing i've ever heard. Sure we can start doubting everything we know, even if our solutions make little sense, but then what's the point of anything? Should i doubt that Japan exists, just because i've never been there? Should i doubt that Aristotle, Plato or Caesar lived, just because i haven't met them personally? Do you not think that the Soviet's would have said something if they had doubted the fact that americans had landed on the moon?
You idiots! Its so obvious that no one has ever been to the moon. Getting out of earths atmosphere and into orbit is the easy part. Thats when you encounter the mind blowingly hard part of how to aim so accurately at something that only has a diameter of 350,000km and then unthinkably landing on it when the gravity is only a sixth of what we have on earth. I think that the complexities of floating through space is far more complicated then say, supersonic flight in our atmosphere.
You idiot it is really obvious that we went. it would be easier to go to the moon then fake it. Hundreds of thousand of people would have to be involved to hoax it atleatst one would have squaked by now. And the soviet union our sole nemisis confirmed that we got to the moon first. Notice that we are sending rovers to other planets and moons THAT is WAYYY more complex then the moon landing. And if america didnt land on the moon then why hasnt any other country went they would be the "First"
Prior to my new perception, i was strongly oppossed to the fact that man landed on the moon during the Apollo 11 mission. However, i find it hard to believe that there was technology back then to create an illuminated surface such as that on the moon. The lunar illumination is visibly noticeable in the backdrop of many of the photographs that Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin took. If someone can provide proof to the contrary, i am all ears.
Please do so. I seem to be in the middle of what is perception and what is reality. I want to believe that man went to the moon. However, there are so many conspiracy theorists out there with valid and trustworthy points. If you can provide me with indisputable and undeniable evidence, then I will believe that all the moon landings took place.
The astronauts never went directly through the van allen belt beacuse the moon sits 10 times higher then the belt. The astronauts went through the very top part getting the radiation equilvent of a few chest x rays or the radiation of living at sea level for 3 years. The space suits are designed to cope with the extreme tempratrue thats why spacesuits cost over a million each
See, this is what i've been struggling with. It's hard for me to believe, as immense and enormous outerspace is, that the astronauts only received x rays equivalent to three chest xrays. Sorry. Please provide me with a more convincing and definitive explanation.
At what point inside the belts are radiation at a minimum. That's why I am having trouble coming to a fathomable conclusion. Also, given the ridiculous amount of technological resources reserved for NASA, why does it seem like a far fetched ordeal to get back to the moon.
The Moon is ten times higher than the Van Allen radiation belts. The spacecraft moved through the belts in just 30 minutes, and the astronauts were protected from the ionizing radiation by the aluminium hulls of the spacecraft. In addition, the orbital transfer trajectory from the Earth to the Moon through the belts was selected to minimize radiation exposure.
Even Dr. James Van Allen, the discoverer of the Van Allen radiation belts, rebutted the claims that radiation levels were too dangerous for the Apollo missions
This is the deal, and let me stress that this is speculation, but is not unthinkable to suspect that Van Allen was given some "say this" cash to satisfy those who are pro moon landing. Remember, we are talking about the government here.
van allen already wrote work about his discovery before the moon landings and whatnot so how could nasa have paid him if he already wrote it years before the missions? . The astronauts got a radiation dosage of 1 REm flying through the belt thats not enough to kill you.
NASA plans to go back there in 2020. They stopped going after the orignal apollo missions because going to the moon 6 times was very taxing and costly.
@brickscity77 More than a matter of faith, i think it's a matter of physics. I'm sure that by buying a good physics book (or by other means) you can find out exactly how much and what kind of radiation the astronauts were subject to and how much radiation a space suit is designed to protect against. It is easy to contradict adjectives with personal opinions, but numbers are numbers and do not depend on anyone's opinions.
@koolanator I might buy that those "pings" were a glare if the camera wasn't stationary. How are you going to say it's a glare (of Sunlight) when the camera didn't even move? Was the Sun going by really fast?
@Justwannalogon Are you really that naive? The sun didn't have to move, the astronaut did. He reflected the light... have you never noticed the glare you get from lamp posts on the road? Google "Picture glare." (under images) There's a good example at the very top of Field Lights giving the exact same effect.
The second "ping" is obviously bad film edges.
The "wire work" between 0:47 and 1:13 is bs... watch the astronaut's feet. He's alternating feet when pushing himself up, there's no delay.
@koolanator so can you explain the axis point rocker effect they are both experiencing? How can they be in a low gravity atmosphere, yet, it only affecting certain areas and not others? The axis point is obvious
and that's where the cables intersect to the gear they have obscuring the critical thought. LIGHTS CAMERAS ACTION Why does everyone want to romantisize Disney?
@oatstao Just watch how long it takes for the dust to settle, I guess each particle has it's own wire...
And an "axis point rocker effect"? Really, you're just grasping at straws now. I guess it's impossible for man to do a cartwheel or back flip on earth because it appears to have a single axis point...
@koolanator you said "I guess it's impossible for man to do a cartwheel or back flip on earth because it appears to have a single axis point... "
I never suggested that at all. I'm talking about the 2 axis points on each side of the astronaut human where the cables connect. I'm speaking about the play of gravity on the situation. You put emphasis on something I did not state. Use examples that corelate please. The added mechanics of musculature of human help aid in a back flip by the way.
@oatstao Go to school, learn some physics and come back to this and prove it to yourself. It's good to note that conspiracy video's like these use select scenes to support their claims.
Try to find the full length footage, you will see that all their claims are debunked.
People claim - "it easy to fake the moon landing"
is it not also true that - "it easy to make the moon landing appear fake"?
Just because you can't explain something, doesn't make it fake or supernatural.
Damn, none of telescopes has the ability to make such small objects visible from earth. Hubble don't have the required resolution. The VLT doesn't have either. Any of our telescopes has.
The magical trick about telescopes is not their resolution but the ability to make very, very dim objects visible. Even very distant galaxies appear quite big compared with structures on the moon. We don't need telescopes to make small objects visible but to make dim objects visible.
Personally I think that we never went to the moon. But there is 1 solution for this all..check with a telescope from earth and see if there is the American flag and the vehicle. JUST THAT SIMPLE
First off, theres no proof that some of these videos aren't of testing that was done on earth. Second, Toward the end when the one astronaut helps the other, you must remember that their strength is multiplied by 6 so if he could normally lift 150 pounds or so with one arm on earth, then he'd be able to lift 900 lbs on the moon.
LOL ofcourse there is gravity, or they would just float away from the surface. Every object in the universe that has mass, DO have gravity, more or less.
1:43 yeah that was a bit too obvious. I guess the American was either too stupid or too careless to have made it that obvious.... lol come on hoaxtards
Wannabe, all I remember is you posting stupid cut and pastes and then running in terror when you're asked to back them up.
Remember when you said no scientists had been to the moon? And I, in a heartbeat, corrected you with the geologist who was on Apollo 17? Your powers of research and reading before you make various idiots out of yourself are no doubt stupendous. ;)
The 8th grade immaturity of your language is proof enough you've got nothing left but dumb whining.
its funny how these people STRIVE to find something wrong with stuff like the moon landings, 9/11, and other events because they cannot comprehend what really happened. when they find the SLIGHTEST glitch, they scream, "COMSPIRACY!" no matter how small it is.
if you were smart enough to read, you would see that I was nailing the people who believe this crap on the cross. Its obvious you arent smart enough to do that.
Last clip is going at a much faster weight. And remember you weigh about 1/6 of your weight on the moon thats why the astronauts are moving in a different way. Standing on their toes and so on.
joachim2464 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Armstrong the 1st moon hoaxer to step on the "moon" studio is funnier than you think.
watch?v=D3pGMjM8fq4
potrodsas 6 months ago
Antihydrogen Laser PHysics Apparatus
watch?v=GoSaHiCduDc
amiasix 10 months ago
@NASAvsPETE wat?
KidGetsHisShitOwned 10 months ago
@NASAvsPETE thank you, finally i convinced someone
KidGetsHisShitOwned 10 months ago
@NASAvsPETE ANTENNAS ON THEIR BACKPACKS!
KidGetsHisShitOwned 10 months ago
@KidGetsHisShitOwned They're not antennas... Sheeple. >.<
AndyHarglesis 10 months ago
@AndyHarglesis are you an idiot? seriously there are pictures of these guys and there equip before they even went on the moon, and theres antennas that were around a foot long? r u that much of an idiot where u cant do ur own research???
KidGetsHisShitOwned 10 months ago 2
Percy is an idiot. The 'ping' at 0.19 is simple over-exposure of the reflection on the radio antenna on the astronauts backpack.
cavanuk 11 months ago 5
In the last scene, the astronaut getting up is holding on to the other astronaut. In my opinion, the moon landings being a hoax is deliberately spread by the Jewish media to discredit other hoaxes about Jews, which are actually true such as the Jews running the economy hoax, the holocaust hoax, the ZOG hoax, etc.
flouflis1a 1 year ago
neil armstrong is a lying sack of shit he dialates and lubes his asshole for buzz to fuck him. they were the first men to buttfuck on the moon i hope they die painful deaths
MrToiletface 1 year ago
Americans are liars! But i still wouldn't wanna be anywhere else!!
Monlooker 1 year ago
THUNDERBIRDS ARE GO!!
MorpheusWasRight 1 year ago
Yankees never went to the moon...it s a conspiracy..yankees are only good in lying to the whole world : 9/11,Pearl Harbor,etc.
Shalilify 1 year ago
@Shalilify I don't know, the Yankees have had some pretty good teams the past few years. I think they just need to rebuild their pitching.
theslug1022 1 year ago
@Shalilify Don't forget how we used HAARP to cause the earthquakes in Indonesia and Haiti and hurricane Katrina. Oh, and how we're joined up with the NWO to do things like spray poison out of commercial jets in order to reduce the world's population by 80%.
When referring to historical events, I wonder why conspiracy theorists almost never mention the Bay of Pigs, Watergate, Chile/Allende, Iran/Contra, etc.
Astrobrant2 1 year ago
anyone know which film this was from? Scazzyhead did not credit..
oatstao 1 year ago
This footage which I don't recall seeing in the other films on the topic, really hit home. Being a trained classical animation student, this becomes extremely relevent to factor this is staged due to the contradicting priciples involved and hilighted so well.
oatstao 1 year ago
1:40 WIRES
nasafakedit 1 year ago
NASA
FAKE EVERYTHING
nasafakedit 1 year ago
LOOK AT MY GEORGE BUSH COMEDY VIDEO!!!!
FilmPA 1 year ago
20th Century Conspiracies:
Sinking of the Lusitania as a reason for the US to enter WWI. 2 years later?
Passage of the Income Tax Admendment
Passage of the Federal Reserve Act
1929 Stock Market Crash
The turnover of most of Europe to Communist Russia in 1945.
Use of the Atomic Bombs after Japan had already sought Peace Terms.
Discrediting of Senator Joseph McCarthy for exposing Communist Influences within the US State Department.
Korean Conflict
Gulf of Tonkin Incident & Vietnam Conflict.
JaracaraAsper 1 year ago
The McCollum memo was first widely accepted with the publication of Robert Stinnett's book Day of Deceit: The Truth About FDR and Pearl Harbor. Stinnett presents the memo as part of his argument that the FDR Administration conspired to secretly provoke Japan to attack the US in order to bring America into the War in Europe without generating contempt over broken political promises. FDR had recently issued a campaign promise that the US would not become entangled in Europe's war under his watch.
JaracaraAsper 1 year ago
McCollum Memo - Pearl Harbor Attack Oct 7, 1940
suggested that the US provoke Japan into committing an "overt act of war". The memo illustrates that the Office of Naval Intelligence promoted the idea of goading Japan into war: "It is not believed that in the present state of political opinion the United States government is capable of declaring war against Japan without more ado [...] If by [the elucidated eight-point plan] Japan could be led to commit an overt act of war, so much the better."
JaracaraAsper 1 year ago
Great way to claim you need all this funding for Nasa so that the money can be funneled elsewhere.
Why do it for real when you can fake it.
See Capricorn One 1977 starring James Brolin, Hal Holbrook and Sam Waterson. Shows just how easily this can be done.
It is rumored that Stanley Kubrik was consulted on developing the false moon landings.
2001 A Space Odyssey was released 1 year 4months prior to the July 1969 Apollo 11 Mission.
Hmmmm.
JaracaraAsper 1 year ago
@JaracaraAsper What happend at the end of capricorn1 ?
musicbruv 1 year ago
@musicbruv You can watch the entire movie on You Tube. Don't want to spoil it for you.
JaracaraAsper 1 year ago
@JaracaraAsper I have seen the movie, my point is they got found out, but 40 years on nobody has shown any evidence of a moon hoax.
musicbruv 1 year ago
@musicbruv That's just a movie. Your not supposed to see any evidence. These people know what they're doing, they have been deceiving Americans and the World for over a hundred years now. What are some of the other fast ones they have pulled: Bombing of the Maine, Sinking of the Lusitania, Creation of the Federal Reserve(Communist Run Central Bank ), IncomeTax Amendment
WWI, 1929 Stock Market Crash, Hitler's rise to power, Pearl Harbor, WWII.Korean
War, Vietnam and on and on. same people.
JaracaraAsper 1 year ago
@JaracaraAsper Oh your one of those people who I call "anti'
musicbruv 1 year ago
@musicbruv Well you must be one of those people that actually thinks Obama was born in the USA, Is not a closet Muslim and is not a full blown Marxist, Socialist Communist. Anti? Why don't you and the rest of the " CATTLE " go back to the corral. No no, all of these events just happen by themselves, there is no one behind anything right? Anti? just another Brain Washed Sheep who refuses to question the " Official Story " If you want to begin to wake up try
World Net Daily . Com
JaracaraAsper 1 year ago
@JaracaraAsper I dont cars where Obama was born, and things dont just happen by themselves, the Lusitania which you mentioned was a British ship sunk by a German submarine during ww1, dont tell me you think that was a conspiracy!
musicbruv 1 year ago
@musicbruv No things don't just happen by themselves. That's exactly right. Did you also know that the German Government took out full page advertisements in the New York Times warning people not to book passage on that ship as it was also carrying Military Munitions and War Materials.
" IN POLITICS, NOTHING HAPPENS BY ACCIDENT. IF IT HAPPENS, YOU CAN BET IT WAS PLANNED THAT WAY. " Franklin D. Roosevelt
Of course it was also widely accepted that the Earth was flat at one time too.
JaracaraAsper 1 year ago
@JaracaraAsper Yes I did know, so what is your point, how was that a conspiracy?
musicbruv 1 year ago
@musicbruv This happened in 1915. Germany was at war with Great Britain. The Germans gave fair warning to all that any ship flying the British Flag would be a Target.
But this was used as an excuse for America to enter the War. Bit of a delayed reaction don't you think? 128 Americans aboard a Ship carrying Military Munitions. And this was the reason we entered the war?
America was a Neutral Country as well as an Isolationist one. WWI was necessary to demonstrate the need for World Gov't
JaracaraAsper 1 year ago
@musicbruv At the end of WWI the LEAGUE OF NATIONS was formed but still America refused to become a part of entangling treaties with other Nation States. This was the reason so many Countries declared War on each other in WWI. Treaties that stated that they would come to the aid in time of War of their Allies. If you consider that just one man's Assassination in Serbia sparked the entire War, this actually was a valid argument for the US to refuse Membership in the League of Nations.
JaracaraAsper 1 year ago
@JaracaraAsper With the failure of pushing the US into membership with the League of Nations it was determined that another avenue should be implemented. This being the infiltration of the US Government by an Organization that would gain control of Top level Positions within the US State Dept. & other Gov't Agencies. This organization was the Council on Foreign Relations based in NY City, Often referred to as the Shadow Gov't of the USA. Every President since FDR has been a member.
JaracaraAsper 1 year ago
P.I.N.G.
-
That's the sound of a moon CT's brain.
Oh something looks different than it does on Earth, P.I.N.G., I won't look for the factual reasons behind it I will just shout FAKE!!!!
-
P.I.N.G.
-
Things look different on the moon , because it's the MOON!!
NASANAZIRACE 1 year ago
obviously never heard of lens flair.
freqimann 1 year ago
Oh so its not the shine of the helmet?
ahampster2 1 year ago
at 1:30 on how on earth or the moon is it possible to get up like that????
jokinaroun100 1 year ago
at 1:30 on how on earth or the moon is it possible to get up like that????
jokinaroun100 1 year ago
the one and just the one result that proves this was not the 'moon' is the size of the sun reflection in any of the apollo landing videos or pictures. it's just too huge to be a point-source of light at infinity. point-source because different pictures in low earth orbits show up the sun reflection more or less as a dot with spokes. why are there no spokes in these apollo visor reflections?
zambi007i 1 year ago
another fact, look at the thing fall off from his backpack. It fell so fast. it should fell at acceleration of 1/6th of earth.
21mugen82 1 year ago
@21mugen82 -- The thing fell from his belt so fast because the video was sped up by the guy who compiled it to fool you. You can plainly see that he shows you the first part of the scene 3 times and each time he runs it faster. And he only shows you the part where the object falls once.
.
Percy is a liar. But he's not a very good one. His lies are way too obvious for people who actually study his subject.
nesokretep 1 year ago 10
@nesokretep said in a "top comment"
"The thing fell from his belt so fast because the video was sped up by the guy who compiled it to fool you"
Ain't that the truth!
But, I think he's got the wrong guys trying to fool us. Percy's a patriot and a hero.
CNN911Fakes 5 months ago
what kind of wires fucktard...? this man is an idiot.
and how come he knows all the specific aspects of being in such a condition since he has not been there?? the powder fine sand on the surface, the vacuum, the technology level in the 60s of the lenses used in the cameras, the film exposed to such extreme conditions, etc, etc...
a simple reflection of the light from the backpack's antenna to the lense. As simple as that.
Maeguk 1 year ago
How did the Astronaut get up at 1.55 with no help? because they other Astronaut does nothing to help him up.
5eurocups2005 1 year ago
yes how???
jokinaroun100 1 year ago
@5eurocups2005 -- You can see plainly that the other astronaut helps him up with his right hand.
nesokretep 1 year ago
@powerfulaid Same reason as you cannot see stars during the day on earth!
musicbruv 1 year ago
so there is actually people who still believe that the USA went to the moon? LOL
rayearth05 1 year ago
@rayearth05 Yup they are called everyone.
MrLamarski 1 year ago
If you don't believe NASA landed men on the moon 6 times, chances are you are an idiot.
NASANAZIRACE 1 year ago
@powerfulaid because it was daytime on the moon, can you see stars during the day on earth?
musicbruv 1 year ago
@powerfulaid why can`t you see stars, if you are in the city at night, which is full of lights? the sunlight-reflection on the moon-surface is to strong for the camera. There was no way to show the stars because the exposure period wasn`t long enough.
TheSGJoey 1 year ago
i thought they would've been floating around more than that lol they seem pretty stable lol
pussycatdoll020 1 year ago
The American tax payer takes it on the chin once again. It was ALL faked because NASA was backed into a corner and couldn't come up with the results expected from all the money they spent.
NURSEOH 1 year ago
lol this is sooooooo dumb
HPhenomenal 2 years ago
David Percy needs to have his head shoved down the toilet again. Once obviously wasn't enough.
davewatcher 2 years ago
Comment removed
davewatcher 2 years ago
NASA FAIRY TALES
According to NOAA Major Solar Flares occurred on every faked apollo mission except 16.
Jan Lundberg from Hasselblad, the maker of the still nasa camera said the moon landing pictures
were a hoax because the camera used had no viewfinder, and the fake pictures had more than one light source.
HJP Arnold, of Kodak who supplied the Ektachrome film for the fake missions
said, " They had to effectively guess where they were pointing the camera."
nasafakedit 2 years ago
How come you're not president of the world?
davewatcher 2 years ago
nasafakedit 2 years ago
Gemini 6 and 7 managed an orbital rendezvous with no computers at all.
The guidance system on the LM and Saturn V was descended from the same guidance system used in Minuteman nuclear missiles. Those missiles were capable of flying across the globe and hitting a city.
The moon is a lot larger than a city.
This certainly appears to make sense to me. How about you? In the absence of any actual understanding, would you care to simply resort to insults?
krisdevalle 2 years ago
kris the retard a pocket calculator landed the toy LM on the moon dickhead
nasafakedit 2 years ago
Actually it was Neil who was piloting. I guess you forgot that.
krisdevalle 2 years ago
Armstrong was pretending to walk on the moon
nasafakedit 2 years ago
I believe people should try to at least study some of the physics and math necessary to comprehend how things actually work before blatantly claiming as undisputable proof that which is only a conspiracy theory. Yes there may be some truth in it, but let us at least consider all the possibilities (and start using more numbers and less adjectives) before jumping to conclusions. All I ask is that people be more humble and well informed (especially in physics) before claiming extraordinary things.
proximumargento 2 years ago
the soviet union's science community were given thousands of photo's, and saw all the videos. They haven't ..NOT ONCE claimed it was fake! and they would've in a heart beat. Theses conspiracy nut are just a bunch of whack jobs! Shame on you! It's un American! Be proud of what your country has done
bcrumpty 2 years ago
the pyramids are used for another purpose we dont know about
ONE1MAN1ARMY 2 years ago
Did you know the purpose of NASA's moon impact was actually to create a moon crop cirlce to send a message to the returning reptillians in 2012. The message reads "We destroyed the twin towers as instructed, please don't use the Great pyramid of Egypt as a portal again as the undersea cables have been severd. Kthnx Bye, Earth"
ocseans 2 years ago 7
@ocseans Holy shit, I was going to have a fun debate with you - but after reading this comment, I realize that I'm no longer having a conversation with a person of even mediocre intelligence. P.S. You're an animation student, that hardly has anything to do with theoretical sciences.
koolanator 1 year ago
@koolanator sarcasm you goose lol
ocseans 1 year ago
@ocseans My bad, I confused you with oatstao :) I was about to reply to one of his comments, then I seen your one and thought that your comment came from him ha-ha.
koolanator 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ocseans can you prove it
karamveer21 1 year ago
How the fuck is that funny? TWAT
camrox156 2 years ago
this video sucks. Aldrin and Neil Armstrong put mirrors on the moon for laser ranging on July 21, 1969, about an hour before the end of their final moonwalk. We still use them today for lunar laser ranging retro-reflection. How the heck did they get there if we never went to the moon?
chrisinsocalif 2 years ago
Well Russia has reflectors on the moon and they admittedly never went to the moon. We have motorized rovers on Mars, and man has never set foot on that planet.
MattBeckstrom 2 years ago
The moon is not a planet.
musicbruv 2 years ago
Never said it was, bro.
MattBeckstrom 2 years ago
lol planet moon
trooper5131 2 years ago
@MattBeckstrom If you watch the last video carefully, something falls out of his suite to quickly, like a regular rock on earth falling from gravity. This oviousbly means the sped the video up to make it look like he was pulled up by cables. No Conspiracy, no hoax.
tinyman12323 1 year ago
@tinyman12323 i means the where at a place with normal gravity
reemstrrr 1 year ago
@tinyman12323 Again, that is under the assumption that this footage was shot on the moon. If this video was not sped up, then it was obviously shot on earth, since the object fell at the rate of gravity on earth. If I see a NASA video where something falls at the rate of gravity, to me it means that that video was shot on earth. If you see a NASA video where something falls at the rate of gravity, it means that hoaxers have tampered with the evidence. Show me the un-tampered video, then.
MattBeckstrom 1 year ago
@MattBeckstrom APOLLO 11: PROOF OF MOON LANDING
tinyman12323 1 year ago
@tinyman12323 hahah
oatstao 1 year ago
@MattBeckstrom Search on youtube first vid APOLLO 11: PROOF OF MOON LANDING
tinyman12323 1 year ago
@MattBeckstrom Actualy it looked like it fell faster than it would on earth this does look sped up they just don't move right something is wrong.
korzon 1 year ago
funding was cut off for that project, which was probably funding a covert operation
lowrider1007 2 years ago
I stand corrected, the laser moon mirror project, was used until 40 years after the apollo misison (2009). I am sure there will be independent companies which may use the mirrors for their own studies or data.
chrisinsocalif 2 years ago
how do u know they are there
ONE1MAN1ARMY 2 years ago
They WERE there. Still evidence on the moon from the visits they made if you get a strong enough optical viewing device.
chrisinsocalif 2 years ago
They did go to the Moon but the videos were made on Earth.
redmond12400 2 years ago
what has this clip got to do with van allen or when we plan to go to the moon the 2nd naught is clearly being lifted by wire look at his feet and the way his pants are riding high wake up this is the only proof you need stop trying to dodge the issue with your sudostatistic clap trap.
bigfist255 2 years ago
What's wrong with the 2ft jump? Keep in mind that the calculation of the expected jump height isn't a linear function like "jump height on Earth multiplied with 6"!
sverebom 2 years ago
do apollogists watch these clips with there eyes shut or are they so tied up in the lie that if one of the naughts started to float 2ft above surface they would have a answer.
bigfist255 2 years ago
Guys, Earth's magnetiv field has been explored with probes, telescopes and other instruments again and again and again and there's really no radiation that can kill a human instantly or in a couple of hours or causes significant lasting damages. Read peer reviewed articles about the topic and learn for yourself.
sverebom 2 years ago
baa baa baa goyim
ThoughCriminal912 2 years ago
Thats rubbish. I colonised the moon 3 years ago. PROVE I DID'NT. People say all kinds of crap. Only idiots believe it.
horseburger 2 years ago
You are so nieve if people really had gone to the moon then they would have started colonising it. No one has ever even been into space. All the rockets were EMPTY of people. Its just an orchestrated hoax to make people beleive in 'the superpower'.
horseburger 2 years ago
Yeah america is going to start colonizing it in 2020 NASA simply didnt have the money or the tech to set up a permanent moon base at the time. Whats your proof?
monimstarfox 2 years ago
@horseburger That's the most ridiculous thing i've ever heard. Sure we can start doubting everything we know, even if our solutions make little sense, but then what's the point of anything? Should i doubt that Japan exists, just because i've never been there? Should i doubt that Aristotle, Plato or Caesar lived, just because i haven't met them personally? Do you not think that the Soviet's would have said something if they had doubted the fact that americans had landed on the moon?
proximumargento 2 years ago
You idiots! Its so obvious that no one has ever been to the moon. Getting out of earths atmosphere and into orbit is the easy part. Thats when you encounter the mind blowingly hard part of how to aim so accurately at something that only has a diameter of 350,000km and then unthinkably landing on it when the gravity is only a sixth of what we have on earth. I think that the complexities of floating through space is far more complicated then say, supersonic flight in our atmosphere.
horseburger 2 years ago
You idiot it is really obvious that we went. it would be easier to go to the moon then fake it. Hundreds of thousand of people would have to be involved to hoax it atleatst one would have squaked by now. And the soviet union our sole nemisis confirmed that we got to the moon first. Notice that we are sending rovers to other planets and moons THAT is WAYYY more complex then the moon landing. And if america didnt land on the moon then why hasnt any other country went they would be the "First"
monimstarfox 2 years ago
Prior to my new perception, i was strongly oppossed to the fact that man landed on the moon during the Apollo 11 mission. However, i find it hard to believe that there was technology back then to create an illuminated surface such as that on the moon. The lunar illumination is visibly noticeable in the backdrop of many of the photographs that Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin took. If someone can provide proof to the contrary, i am all ears.
brickscity77 2 years ago
what proof do you need that the moon landings happened i would be glad to provide
monimstarfox 2 years ago
Please do so. I seem to be in the middle of what is perception and what is reality. I want to believe that man went to the moon. However, there are so many conspiracy theorists out there with valid and trustworthy points. If you can provide me with indisputable and undeniable evidence, then I will believe that all the moon landings took place.
brickscity77 2 years ago
well name one conspiracy theory that you have heard about so i can begin :)
monimstarfox 2 years ago
What about the van alen belts and the extreme temperature changes that occur during the day.
brickscity77 2 years ago
The astronauts never went directly through the van allen belt beacuse the moon sits 10 times higher then the belt. The astronauts went through the very top part getting the radiation equilvent of a few chest x rays or the radiation of living at sea level for 3 years. The space suits are designed to cope with the extreme tempratrue thats why spacesuits cost over a million each
monimstarfox 2 years ago
See, this is what i've been struggling with. It's hard for me to believe, as immense and enormous outerspace is, that the astronauts only received x rays equivalent to three chest xrays. Sorry. Please provide me with a more convincing and definitive explanation.
brickscity77 2 years ago
They only spent about half an hour traveling through the belt and at the point in the belt were radiation is at a minimum
monimstarfox 2 years ago
At what point inside the belts are radiation at a minimum. That's why I am having trouble coming to a fathomable conclusion. Also, given the ridiculous amount of technological resources reserved for NASA, why does it seem like a far fetched ordeal to get back to the moon.
brickscity77 2 years ago
The Moon is ten times higher than the Van Allen radiation belts. The spacecraft moved through the belts in just 30 minutes, and the astronauts were protected from the ionizing radiation by the aluminium hulls of the spacecraft. In addition, the orbital transfer trajectory from the Earth to the Moon through the belts was selected to minimize radiation exposure.
monimstarfox 2 years ago
Even Dr. James Van Allen, the discoverer of the Van Allen radiation belts, rebutted the claims that radiation levels were too dangerous for the Apollo missions
is that proof enough?
monimstarfox 2 years ago
This is the deal, and let me stress that this is speculation, but is not unthinkable to suspect that Van Allen was given some "say this" cash to satisfy those who are pro moon landing. Remember, we are talking about the government here.
brickscity77 2 years ago
van allen already wrote work about his discovery before the moon landings and whatnot so how could nasa have paid him if he already wrote it years before the missions? . The astronauts got a radiation dosage of 1 REm flying through the belt thats not enough to kill you.
monimstarfox 2 years ago
NASA plans to go back there in 2020. They stopped going after the orignal apollo missions because going to the moon 6 times was very taxing and costly.
monimstarfox 2 years ago
@brickscity77 More than a matter of faith, i think it's a matter of physics. I'm sure that by buying a good physics book (or by other means) you can find out exactly how much and what kind of radiation the astronauts were subject to and how much radiation a space suit is designed to protect against. It is easy to contradict adjectives with personal opinions, but numbers are numbers and do not depend on anyone's opinions.
proximumargento 2 years ago
its obvious that the moon landings are hoaxed.
ThoughCriminal912 2 years ago
OMG A PING!!!
You know that there aren't any other reflective objects that could EVER make that same. Guess these guys never heard of glare.
And the second part of the video, no wire took the weight. Watch his left hand, he's pulling himself up from the other astronaughts belt...
Anyway... funny haha
koolanator 2 years ago 4
@koolanator I might buy that those "pings" were a glare if the camera wasn't stationary. How are you going to say it's a glare (of Sunlight) when the camera didn't even move? Was the Sun going by really fast?
Justwannalogon 1 year ago
@Justwannalogon Are you really that naive? The sun didn't have to move, the astronaut did. He reflected the light... have you never noticed the glare you get from lamp posts on the road? Google "Picture glare." (under images) There's a good example at the very top of Field Lights giving the exact same effect.
The second "ping" is obviously bad film edges.
The "wire work" between 0:47 and 1:13 is bs... watch the astronaut's feet. He's alternating feet when pushing himself up, there's no delay.
koolanator 1 year ago
@koolanator so can you explain the axis point rocker effect they are both experiencing? How can they be in a low gravity atmosphere, yet, it only affecting certain areas and not others? The axis point is obvious
and that's where the cables intersect to the gear they have obscuring the critical thought. LIGHTS CAMERAS ACTION Why does everyone want to romantisize Disney?
oatstao 1 year ago
@oatstao Just watch how long it takes for the dust to settle, I guess each particle has it's own wire...
And an "axis point rocker effect"? Really, you're just grasping at straws now. I guess it's impossible for man to do a cartwheel or back flip on earth because it appears to have a single axis point...
koolanator 1 year ago
@koolanator you said "I guess it's impossible for man to do a cartwheel or back flip on earth because it appears to have a single axis point... "
I never suggested that at all. I'm talking about the 2 axis points on each side of the astronaut human where the cables connect. I'm speaking about the play of gravity on the situation. You put emphasis on something I did not state. Use examples that corelate please. The added mechanics of musculature of human help aid in a back flip by the way.
oatstao 1 year ago
@oatstao Go to school, learn some physics and come back to this and prove it to yourself. It's good to note that conspiracy video's like these use select scenes to support their claims.
Try to find the full length footage, you will see that all their claims are debunked.
People claim - "it easy to fake the moon landing"
is it not also true that - "it easy to make the moon landing appear fake"?
Just because you can't explain something, doesn't make it fake or supernatural.
koolanator 1 year ago
@koolanator you said : "Just because you can't explain something, doesn't make it fake or supernatural"
well looks like you can't explain anything about both sides now.
Your presumptions about school and my knowledge of mainstream physics reveal your limited bias.
If you would see I asked about the axis point where the weight is being distrubuted along the wires.
That is basic physics.
I ask you , what is your vested interest in the deceit? Are you wanting to be the 2% elite?
oatstao 1 year ago
Comment removed
koolanator 1 year ago
@Justwannalogon It's obvious reflect of apparatus and if someone wants to deny that, they can remain ignorant.
If it follows such a perfect straight and taut line like a cable under weight does, up and down 90degrees
you have to be pretty sleepy not to see that. good point!
oatstao 1 year ago
Damn, none of telescopes has the ability to make such small objects visible from earth. Hubble don't have the required resolution. The VLT doesn't have either. Any of our telescopes has.
The magical trick about telescopes is not their resolution but the ability to make very, very dim objects visible. Even very distant galaxies appear quite big compared with structures on the moon. We don't need telescopes to make small objects visible but to make dim objects visible.
sverebom 2 years ago
Personally I think that we never went to the moon. But there is 1 solution for this all..check with a telescope from earth and see if there is the American flag and the vehicle. JUST THAT SIMPLE
markbest17 2 years ago
First off, theres no proof that some of these videos aren't of testing that was done on earth. Second, Toward the end when the one astronaut helps the other, you must remember that their strength is multiplied by 6 so if he could normally lift 150 pounds or so with one arm on earth, then he'd be able to lift 900 lbs on the moon.
ianttowns 2 years ago
Lol thats not wires.
Its the antenna on their backpacks.
DavoPhillips 2 years ago
I'd say nothing is conspiracy
pyllywaltteri 2 years ago
+ He is dropping something and it just falls down really fast shouldnt it just float since its no gravity on the moon?
finasemlor 2 years ago
there is gravity on the moon. 1/6 of that on earth
DavoPhillips 2 years ago
LOL ofcourse there is gravity, or they would just float away from the surface. Every object in the universe that has mass, DO have gravity, more or less.
evensmaller 2 years ago
No. The moon's gravitational force is 1/6th that of earth.
Synthetrix 2 years ago
there is gravity on the moon... just not as much as on earth... ... ...
koolanator 2 years ago
He isnt even touching him....
finasemlor 2 years ago
look at 1:40 how the fuck do you not see thats a wire?
finasemlor 2 years ago
Once the U.S. government allowed injection of radioactive substances into a limited group of their own population.
It was an experiment that occurred with the utmost secrecy. "The experiments rats" knew nothing.
Question: Is it possible that the moon landing was a bluff?
Answer: Sure!
ForAll23 2 years ago
Some people really get bored in front of their screen...
FlyRabb 2 years ago
huoh omg.. How can every fucking event be a conspiracy
pyllywaltteri 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
yeaah it's a fake
ROBERT13101983 2 years ago
Hey guys, no need to get angry at the ignorant people who think it was a hoax. That's humanity!
Some people are smart, some people are douche bags. Just let the douche bags believe what they want, it's their loss.
DavoPhillips 2 years ago
The Astro-->nut fell down
joekeyrose 2 years ago
1:43 yeah that was a bit too obvious. I guess the American was either too stupid or too careless to have made it that obvious.... lol come on hoaxtards
ZhangyXD 2 years ago
What was that he dropped right at the end and why did it not float as there was no gravity?
BUNGLEJOY 2 years ago
Are you people just total ignorant morons? There is gravity on the moon!
quaheedus 2 years ago
theres a little gravity on the moon. just not as much as on earth.
Doomedgrinder 2 years ago
at the last few seconds when he drops something it falls pretty fast
birth7781 2 years ago 3
Wannabe, all I remember is you posting stupid cut and pastes and then running in terror when you're asked to back them up.
Remember when you said no scientists had been to the moon? And I, in a heartbeat, corrected you with the geologist who was on Apollo 17? Your powers of research and reading before you make various idiots out of yourself are no doubt stupendous. ;)
The 8th grade immaturity of your language is proof enough you've got nothing left but dumb whining.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 years ago
That "Ping" on 0:37 is clearly dirt on the film.
Scouren 2 years ago
Been looking for years. Still dont see any wires.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 years ago
all i see is light from the sun reflecting off of the helmet.
Still no wires
evilclown9911 2 years ago
You and me both.
The only people who see "wires" are the ones who WANT to see them.
SpreadingtheMuse 2 years ago
its funny how these people STRIVE to find something wrong with stuff like the moon landings, 9/11, and other events because they cannot comprehend what really happened. when they find the SLIGHTEST glitch, they scream, "COMSPIRACY!" no matter how small it is.
evilclown9911 2 years ago 2
its a hoax
you're to stupid to believe it
B1gBassa 2 years ago
who are you talking to?
evilclown9911 2 years ago
you.
B1gBassa 2 years ago
if you were smart enough to read, you would see that I was nailing the people who believe this crap on the cross. Its obvious you arent smart enough to do that.
evilclown9911 2 years ago
erm isnt it abvoius i clicked the wrong reply bit..damm chillllllll
B1gBassa 2 years ago
double check next time
evilclown9911 2 years ago
Moon Dehoax: Wire Tales.
Analysis of the evidence against the race to the moon: The photographer and his fortune in lies.
watch?v=PMxvw6-4PWE
jcgmed 2 years ago
well if it was sooooooo fake then why didn't they edit that footage out, like the so-called wires. ooooooooooo :D
ACCNRH 2 years ago
faked nasa sh|t!
user17v 3 years ago