Not sure why Slava says Smalltalk can't add a method at runtime without recompiling existing methods. IIRC, it can. But like Objective-C, changing ivars can require a recompile.
what he said about ruby (@ 45 mins) is only true of block parameters, not true of variables defined within the block/lambda in general. Further this was acknowledged as a 'bug' and is fixed in the most recent version of ruby.
This guy is good at what he does. I know him. Factor is my favorite language. Don't talk trash about a language before writing any code in it. Factor's mathematical power is solid, with seamless bignums and complex values built in without libraries.
I remember mccarthy put smak down on ruby by asking his commentator if it was neccesary to iterate each time to do xyz in ruby. Guy said yes. Mccarthy then said ruby is not where lisp was in 1960.
Haskell doesn't *really* have this problem. Classes are groupings of functions, and you can later make things instances of those classes by defining functions of that class for your new object.
I don't see a major advantage yet to factor, but the Forthiness is neat.
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and it's here but the coverup is strong, if u r interested in a REAL free energy magnet motor
just go to LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM and download the blueprints ,it's probably the ONLY working magnet
motor out there. Join the free energy revolution!!
ivylsp 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free Energy is real and it's here! The Big Oil companies r doing everything they can to stop this
information. If you want a Free energy magnet motor , get the blueprints at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM , Join the energy revolution!
lavernedi 1 year ago
How different from Joy?
b43xoit 1 year ago
Not sure why Slava says Smalltalk can't add a method at runtime without recompiling existing methods. IIRC, it can. But like Objective-C, changing ivars can require a recompile.
stevedekorte 1 year ago
what he said about ruby (@ 45 mins) is only true of block parameters, not true of variables defined within the block/lambda in general. Further this was acknowledged as a 'bug' and is fixed in the most recent version of ruby.
johnmair 2 years ago
no way, jose
jsakltk 2 years ago
estas tre sprita en la komenco: "saluton, cxiuj!" Kaj oni vidas preskaux neniun!!
It's so funny at the beginning. The guy says: "hello, everybody" and you can see almost nobody in the audience!!
valberm 2 years ago
Fakto estos esperanta lingvo :)
emptist 2 years ago
@valberm: Right now I can see at the lower right corner of the video: "20 032 views" ;-)
Tia1ko 1 year ago
this looks like a beautiful language. i think i'm going to pick it up to create my custom game making tools that i've been wanting to make.
karmacop911 2 years ago
now thats a pretty big number ... heeey
PriestBurn 2 years ago
This guy is good at what he does. I know him. Factor is my favorite language. Don't talk trash about a language before writing any code in it. Factor's mathematical power is solid, with seamless bignums and complex values built in without libraries.
Veritian 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
how did you get the video to be over 10 min. long?
DJgamer999 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
CloJure is way way advanced as a language
or may be this presentation was bad.
When u talk about language keep the libraries away for atleast first half of the persentation.
zyxrationalist 3 years ago
Interesting..kinda like FORTH on steroids
snashik 3 years ago 3
I remember mccarthy put smak down on ruby by asking his commentator if it was neccesary to iterate each time to do xyz in ruby. Guy said yes. Mccarthy then said ruby is not where lisp was in 1960.
bootiack 3 years ago
Can you explain that more? What talk?
Disprofuse 3 years ago
Haskell doesn't *really* have this problem. Classes are groupings of functions, and you can later make things instances of those classes by defining functions of that class for your new object.
I don't see a major advantage yet to factor, but the Forthiness is neat.
leimy2k 3 years ago 2
"Classes are groupings of functions"
Is this properly called "function", or is it rather a more abstract, uhm, "operation"? (Isn't there a special term for this stuff in CT, anyway?)
Tia1ko 1 year ago
boa constructor... nice :)
cronin1024 3 years ago 2
Great talk!
jankoM2 3 years ago 2