Hitler's Favourite Royal (2of2)

[Lynx69100]

Can you upload the full version of this ? The other versions have been posted by obvious Nazi lovers. The Prince's involvement in the T4 program, for example, has been deleted.

[bcpii]

In 1936- English Gov. appeased Hitler & self-disarmed. Churchill said Hitler would attack so was called a War Monger. A hopeless situation for a disarmed England! Did E-VIII abdicate, fake a roll to position himself to mitigate harsh subjugation of England in future? In 1940, did his words & dangerous wandering from Paris to Provence to Portugal, offer himself as “bait”, hoping to delay Hitler’s invasion past summer & radar setup?- Hitler did delay. -Did Edward’s desperate acts save Britain?

[He101A]

The fascists always used the old aristocracy, the Jews are the ones who destroyed old the old aristocracy and culture.

[msalah2341]

this jist show how fake thay are

[FINISUNIVERSI]

if any german would love his/her country they need to reject hitler and nazis because they were traitors to their country, the nazis were founded by the elite and worked togheter with them, The Vatican, Top masons, Knights of Malta , the royals, who do think owns the corporations or a major shareholders ?

peace take care.

[FlusherD12]

@FINISUNIVERSI

I disagree, it was the nazis that helped germany become the super of Europe( Yes they did bring germany down at the end) if wasnt for the nazi resigme we wouldnt have the same germany as we would have today.

[FINISUNIVERSI]

@FlusherD12 how did the NAZIS helped becoming Germany Super of Europe ?

[classican]

A video on the rise of Hitler hardly highlights the virtues of republicanism!

[3NUNS]

Actually, the Americans in their unfair approach to practicalities of the Versailles Treaty probably, although in part, contributed to the intensity of Nazism's view on race.

[3NUNS]

Yes. Very interesting. But their are some very incorrect historical generalisations. In poor taste to use this history to advocate republicanism. Very revealing anyway.

[mmedefarge]

As a Yank, I'd always thought that the modern monarchy in England was maintained for nostalgia & tourism purposes. Until the 1st morning of my 1st visit to England when I saw an ambulance with sirens wailing, forced to stop to make way for the Queen's Cavalry Guard (whoever those red-jacketed, Roman Centurion helmet-wearing, horse riders who hole-up in Whitehall are). And then came the whole Princess Diana debacle when the bizarreness of the whole monarchical process was exposed to the world.

[johneunson]

all the royals are / were sympathetic to germany......they are germans. like the rest, this guy was from a dysfunctional family. only his sister cared. a pathetic figure who was in the wrong place at the wrong time. hitler took the place of his uncaring parents. it happened with edward v111 as well. another dimwit.

[miltytube]

Watching this took me back to the 1966 World Cup final between Germany and England. Had Germany won, history might have turned out a whole lot different.

[remedy63]

I live in northern Ireland

IM NOT ONE BIT SURPRISED!!

Free Ireland!! Tiocfaidh ar la!!

[mronelove]

Even though I have issues with the Royals for e.g. the way they treated Princess Diana..Watching this video has taken my perspective of them to a new level... I'm shock,,, very shock...

[AmericanDiaz]

Amazing dialogue, I have been following these saxe coburgs for years and like to hear it from the "locals" instead of some book. Please continue enlightening us........

[stewartkee]

In Britain the Monarchy presents a safety blanket, for even if the Nazies where to win a Majority vote, the Queen would have it in her power not to recognise this goverment. Instead she could demand a coalition Goverment.

[YogaNate79]

Queen Elizabeth II is Constitutional Monarchy with powers vested into her which have little significance today. She is a figurehead as is her entire family. She is Head of State not a Head of Government.

The real power rests with Number 10 Downing Street and not Buckingham Palace.

[YogaNate79]

The British Royal Family is not even British. They are as German as is an imported Mercedes-Benz.

[stewartkee]

Oh Yes, how British could they be. After all only SEVEN GENERATIONS AGO there was a German in the Family called Prince Albert. That Makes Them Practicly Fascists Dosen't it. Except that Prince Albert was President of the Nachinal Socilist Crusades Against Slavery, Child Work Laws and Dueling. That Makes him a Good deal less Bigited that you YogaNate79.

[YogaNate79]

I am sorry that you cannot see the truth in how corrupted this family is. They have ties to the Rothschilds, the Bushes, and the Saudi Royals which comprise the New World Order.

Queen Elizabeth II is not British. She is German with an English sounding name and accent. The British people have been fooled and have such short memory. George VI and the Qeen Mother's tough stance on Nazism during WW2 was a good show. Most of their relatives were ardent fascists loyal to Mr. Adolf Hitler.

[RepublicUK]

Let's not mention the Queens sisters in law (and the next Kings various Aunts and Uncles) who were high ranking Nazis. This family are more intertwined with Nazi's than any other.

[revengeofcleveland]

they should have executed him..but all the royals are criminals look what the monarchy did to Ireland..

[12only1]

the thing is, he too was probably set up to take the fall for history.... come on, his health saved his life.Him from going to jail? .... excuse me, millions died here.

[stewartkee]

You Think Cromwell was any Better?

[revengeofcleveland]

me?! no not really but thats like having to choose between hitler and stalin ..both murderous bastards..fals dilema..

[ekocentric]

Sort of a: which bottle of vinegar is the most sour in the case of vinegar deal?

[revengeofcleveland]

if i had to pick a merdering bastra out of history it would be Maximilien François Marie Isidore de Robespierre & Napoleon Bonaparte if i had to massacer tens of thousands of people i'd prefer them to be enemies of the republic and i've always had a thing for the The guillotine given the chance i'd have joined right in and chopped those aristocratic bastards heads without

hesitation OFF WITH THEIR BLOODY HEADS

LONG LIVE THE REPUBLIC!

[Connell1967]

I don't really understand why you British still have a royal family, I mean they don't have any political power anymore so what real purpose do they serve?

[The8thDOCTOR]

What an interesting story, it would make a fantastic film.

Poor fella Charles- Edward, A member of the Royal family who is given a bad poker hand and has to try to play it to the best of his ability.

btw how does this sad film of unfortunate circumstances support your idea of having President Bush ruling GB?

[RepublicUK]

President Bush ruling GB, what the fuck are you on about?

[The8thDOCTOR]

maybe GWB is a better way go instead of the monarchy, since they are "elected"?

and wounldn't the world be a safer place?

[RepublicUK]

GWB is American, unlikely to be elected by the British. You're not too sharp are you.

[The8thDOCTOR]

you know the point im making, perhaps you want to be the dictator of GB?

btw, what is it that you want?

why do you want to destroy the monarchy?

[RepublicUK]

Do I want to be the Dictator of GB? No. I want a system whereby the head of the country is elected, unlike the current system whereby they are in that position by the luck of being descendent from people who murdered their way into power. Simple enough for you?

[The8thDOCTOR]

but what is wrong with the present system?

do u really want to have a republician president like ur hero GWB?

[RepublicUK]

My hero? What are you blabbering about now? If you can't make a sensible comment don't bother at all.

[The8thDOCTOR]

but what is wrong with a constitutional monarchy?

[RepublicUK]

They are Unelected, Unaccountable, Bigoted, in their position through luck and their ancestors murdering their way there.

Do you believe all people are born equal? because that's not the way it works here. You (and everyone in this country) can never be, or tell your children that they can be whatever they want to be, because in this country they can't.

They can't be head of state. You'll have to tell them they are second class citizens, in fact a 'subject', not a citizen at all.

[GiovanniCarestini]

Unelected maybe, but entirely accountable to an elected body - the last time a monarch defied the will of Parliament was in 1708. Bigoted - against whom - I actually cannot think whom they're bigotted against? And to say that they got their position by "murdering their way there" is absurd, considering that the House of Hanover and all further lines came to the throne smoothly by dynastic laws confirmed by Parliament - yes, an elected Parliament - in the Act of Settlement of 1701.

[LightYearsFromHere]

Also, constitutionally the Monarch is in a way elected. Although the selection of a monarch is determined by lineage, ultimately it is Paliament (and in ancient times the Anglo-Saxon Witan council) that chooses and confirms a successor. Since we elect Parliament, we empower it to determine the monarch who is the reserve executive authority. The Monarch reigns by popular consent and can only check against Parliament if the popular will of the people empowers her to do so.

[celtsbhoy88]

bigoted you ask, against catholic's. and murerd they did, 10's of thousands of irish every year. there where many people murdered in dublin castle everyday by the crown. hung drawn and q

[garyap3]

@The8thDOCTOR If you don't know what is wrong, THAT IS WHAT'S WRONG!!!! Monarchies are the antithesis of equality and a poison that perpetuates the subjugation of the poor and the week. No race is superior to another just as no family is superior to another, if all humans are born equal, why do monarchies exist?

[AvatarMarxon90]

@garyap3 Obviously no humans nor races are superior to others. Thank God we (or the Allies) defeated the Axis (especially Germany and Japan) in the Second World War. If you analyze a Republic, you get the same conclusion: it's the antithesis of equality, and feeds off the poorest and the weakest of our society. You don't agree? Let's see. I'm the son of lower-middle-class parents. I will never achieve the Presidency of Portugal, simply because I don't have a name (contacts).

[AvatarMarxon90]

@garyap3 And I don't belong to a political party. So, if the Head-of-State should stay above political parties (like a true Constitutional Monarch is) why are the Presidents elected from parties? Why do they need a political hand? Why do they need to promise this and that? The Republic is automatically rigged. A Constitutional Monarchy, although it has its "cons" (like belonging to one family alone), its "pros" are a greater advantage: it guarantees us that the Monarch is independent and free.

[AvatarMarxon90]

@garyap3 For if the Monarch is free, I am free (hence the important of a Constitutional Parliamentary Monarchy). Now, it's up to each nation to analyse its history and culture, and choose between both regimes. Not because it's outdated. That argument is stupid, and just shows people don't know what Monarchy is.

As simple as that.

[AvatarMarxon90]

@garyap3 The Monarch doesn't stand on a higher ground than us. Remember that Monarchs who went against the country and its people were put out of the throne (they are as human as we "commoners" are, perishable of the same sins, mistakes, virtues, happiness and sadness). The Monarch, which people tend to say, is "ceremonial", represents everything that is good about your country. In this case, the UK. She is the first thing that comes to mind (the Queen, Big Ben, tea, and the Scottish Kilts).

[yellyman]

This is the grandfather of the king of Sweden!