I'm 13:13 in... he's not telling the truth. Watch The Kennedy Assassination, Beyond conspiracy
especially 1hr 23 min in. But the whole doc is brilliant. It shows a very detailed explanation and from here on creates doubt on everything Michael Ruppert says.
@Avidcomp This isn't a doc on JFK. He is describing whats in the video. The REASON why he's showing it is to tell you WHY he's not showing building 7's collapse.
@Innadiated okay. I'll watch the whole thing when I have time before making more comments (if indeed I even feel the need to) I just reacted to exactly what he said and he said as I posted in my last comment, but that (albeit out of context) comment of his at the point is incorrect, hence I became doubtful of anything further to come. My mouth is shut until I've seen the whole programme. I do recommend the BBC doc if you're interested.
@Avidcomp Yes, his actual material doesn't start until about 20mins in or so. The first portion is just an explanation on the difference between presenting a factual solid case, or one based on speculation. This sets a strong tone for the rest of the film in regards to the fact-based nature (which is essentially court-room quality) of the presentation.
@lawsarejusttogovern On the clip you sent me go to 0:17:20 and watch how they talk about the line of the bullet. Now go to my clip /watch?v=DPjpd90Z9rg at begin at 1:19:20 and note the seating position. There.. no need for the "magic bullet" conspiracy.
@Avidcomp That's interesting when I get the time next month I will investigate those claims and see if they hold true if so then my opinion may change. Until then there is not enough conclusive evidence proving like wise. At the moment I consider it speculation. Again that does not rule out that it could be factual.
Christ, this guy is GOOD. Nailing it publically already in November 2001 without even looking at the event itself. And as he shows, it's just the tip of an iceberg. USA is a goner unless the 99 rises "but the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor". The unveiling of 9/11 as an inside job should qualify.
Spread good links to friends about 9/11. That's the place to start. Personally I use "Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7". It has to be science based. Knowledge combined with anger is a killer and there's a lot to kill.
Its amazing how hypocritical the republicans are by banning drugs, yet the CIA send planes to the Darién to handle the FARC's drugs and drug money, as well as re-establishing the poppy fields that the Taliban destroyed. Bush must've loved watching the news when 9/11 happened, he must've thought 'now this is an excuse to send more troops to the Middle East, therefore its easier for us to exploit the resources there.' Well, not exactly that as Bush can't say words with more than 2 syllables...
@HillyGypsy Except, he didn't watch it on the news, he heard about it from a random presidential entourage guy while sitting in on story time at an elementary school.
why would they pilot the planes with remote control when they have a wealth of young islamic men willing to die for a cheap price...do people realize in the mid east you can ORDER suicide bombers...they are young men willing to die if their family is given a few thousand dollars..they are cheap and in abundance
Oh they probably had both. A dimwit to sit behind the weels and a remote control to be sure that he didn't miss. The incredible 320 degree turn at high speed descent towards such a small target as the side of Pentagon, notably the best reinforced around the area mostly inhabited, clearly suggest it. Of course you'd have to have it as backup for the Twin Towers as well so those looners couldn't fail. That's how I would have pulled it through had I run the operation.
Never Forget ------ Investigate 911------
ANDREWOFPR2 1 month ago 2
If it weren't for mindless usage of gas...
I could see POTENTIALLY fighting for oil, however, it is hard for me to get behind war for resources when we use those resources for FUN..
Hell, how much petroleum do we use simply so we can drink pop?
thefakeyeti 1 month ago
I'm 13:13 in... he's not telling the truth. Watch The Kennedy Assassination, Beyond conspiracy
especially 1hr 23 min in. But the whole doc is brilliant. It shows a very detailed explanation and from here on creates doubt on everything Michael Ruppert says.
Avidcomp 1 month ago
@Avidcomp At 13:13 he is using that video to demonstrate that circumstantial evidence proves nothing. I think you just made his point.
Innadiated 1 month ago
@Innadiated Really? But he says that the bullet came from the front and not as the government says, from behind
Avidcomp 1 month ago
@Avidcomp This isn't a doc on JFK. He is describing whats in the video. The REASON why he's showing it is to tell you WHY he's not showing building 7's collapse.
Innadiated 1 month ago
@Innadiated okay. I'll watch the whole thing when I have time before making more comments (if indeed I even feel the need to) I just reacted to exactly what he said and he said as I posted in my last comment, but that (albeit out of context) comment of his at the point is incorrect, hence I became doubtful of anything further to come. My mouth is shut until I've seen the whole programme. I do recommend the BBC doc if you're interested.
Avidcomp 1 month ago
@Avidcomp Yes, his actual material doesn't start until about 20mins in or so. The first portion is just an explanation on the difference between presenting a factual solid case, or one based on speculation. This sets a strong tone for the rest of the film in regards to the fact-based nature (which is essentially court-room quality) of the presentation.
Innadiated 1 month ago
@Avidcomp Here is a good film on JFK, /watch?v=DAQ5mFkrlDs
lawsarejusttogovern 1 month ago
@lawsarejusttogovern On the clip you sent me go to 0:17:20 and watch how they talk about the line of the bullet. Now go to my clip /watch?v=DPjpd90Z9rg at begin at 1:19:20 and note the seating position. There.. no need for the "magic bullet" conspiracy.
Avidcomp 1 month ago
@Avidcomp That's interesting when I get the time next month I will investigate those claims and see if they hold true if so then my opinion may change. Until then there is not enough conclusive evidence proving like wise. At the moment I consider it speculation. Again that does not rule out that it could be factual.
lawsarejusttogovern 1 month ago
Comment removed
lawsarejusttogovern 4 weeks ago
The Kennedy Assassination, Beyond conspiracy
Avidcomp 1 month ago
This guy's badass, and speaks the TRUTH.
243jmg 1 month ago
the goverment is trying to get acces to shut down websites. imagine when they remove the last information source
General420smoke 2 months ago
Christ, this guy is GOOD. Nailing it publically already in November 2001 without even looking at the event itself. And as he shows, it's just the tip of an iceberg. USA is a goner unless the 99 rises "but the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbor". The unveiling of 9/11 as an inside job should qualify.
HurburBurbur 3 months ago
anyone know if there is a "Patel" connection?
privacyvideo4u 5 months ago
So what do we do about it? Nothing.
rumblybog 5 months ago
@rumblybog
Spread good links to friends about 9/11. That's the place to start. Personally I use "Architects and Engineers - Solving the Mystery of WTC 7". It has to be science based. Knowledge combined with anger is a killer and there's a lot to kill.
HurburBurbur 3 months ago
Its amazing how hypocritical the republicans are by banning drugs, yet the CIA send planes to the Darién to handle the FARC's drugs and drug money, as well as re-establishing the poppy fields that the Taliban destroyed. Bush must've loved watching the news when 9/11 happened, he must've thought 'now this is an excuse to send more troops to the Middle East, therefore its easier for us to exploit the resources there.' Well, not exactly that as Bush can't say words with more than 2 syllables...
HillyGypsy 5 months ago
@HillyGypsy Except, he didn't watch it on the news, he heard about it from a random presidential entourage guy while sitting in on story time at an elementary school.
EmilioCasavegas 2 months ago
why would they pilot the planes with remote control when they have a wealth of young islamic men willing to die for a cheap price...do people realize in the mid east you can ORDER suicide bombers...they are young men willing to die if their family is given a few thousand dollars..they are cheap and in abundance
human0un 5 months ago
@human0un
Oh they probably had both. A dimwit to sit behind the weels and a remote control to be sure that he didn't miss. The incredible 320 degree turn at high speed descent towards such a small target as the side of Pentagon, notably the best reinforced around the area mostly inhabited, clearly suggest it. Of course you'd have to have it as backup for the Twin Towers as well so those looners couldn't fail. That's how I would have pulled it through had I run the operation.
HurburBurbur 3 months ago
thank god for youtube, thanks for this post.
EveKadmon 5 months ago
Thanks for uploading this.
TheeUnidentified 5 months ago
This video definitely changed my life, and opened my eyes to a dark side of the world I knew existed, but had not fully understood.
BEATYOAZ 5 months ago 2
bush and his yes men should be in fucking jail!
TheAngryarchangel 6 months ago 2
Watched this in 2002, changed my life forever. Thank you Mike :)
lawsarejusttogovern 9 months ago 14
Wow!!!!!!
TheZoider 9 months ago 5