@GamerGraphicsTV I'll have to get that one later. The 6850 is what I'm getting, and I'm just gonna upgrade to two later. Buying a PC because I'm done with the console community. Thanks for the reply
@lloodyMurda I think it is a good idea to buy parts online and build the system yourself yes. Alienware on the other hand you end up paying a lot more for their custom cases and logos. I would steer clear of them in my opinion.
When you actually do a comparrison of low settings and ultra settings when looking at the wall or trees or w/e, you can see big differences, but when you just play the game normally its hard to even tell whats better or not.
@OMFGWTFBBQSAUCEHAX yeh i have a 9500gt and rest of the rig is pretty much the same. I did have issues the 1st time around but bethesda came out with patches, i updated my drivers and now i can play this game on max resolution with high settings with barely any lags or freezes, crazy shit lol
How much, roughly, did this / would this cost to make - or, in other words - how much would it cost me to make a gaming PC of the same specs as this (broadly) but possibly with slightly different, cheaper components?
Ok so to all you geeks who know your s**t, is the xbox 360 graphics setting the same as low settings on a pc because it looks to me like the 360 graphics are better than the zero detail moss shown on this vid of pc low settings.
There's a huge difference between low settings run on a powerful computer, and low settings on a computer that can barely even manage that. Putting my tiny FPS aside, my game looks like Morrowind on lowest using my laptop. Looking forward to playing it on a new PC soon.
@Zevan12 Low settings most likely, to play a high demanding game such as Skyrim you need a good Graphics card, i recommend turning off the high demanding settings such as AA and shadows, this can gain you quite a lot of fps, but it's also a good idea to look into a new graphics card because it will save you from spending more money in the future on upgrades to play games on decent settings, the Nvidia GTX 560 and 570 are good, the 560 is under £200 and is a powerful card:)
the differences aren't that bad, you can still play on low graphics and have tons of fun, makes me happy that they put effort for those with regular pc's not just ultra gaming supercomputers (though i'm saving to get one of those anyways :P) awesomeness :D
Ultra settings is 90% dependent on the CPU power not the GPU. If we compare High to Ultra, there is not a single difference in the textures, but the draw distance is absolutely improved, so the game looks much prettier. I have Intel Dual Core E5700 and HD 5670 and I play it on High at around 38FPS average, but as soon as I shift to Ultra, the FPS become on 5 !!!. This explains that how much Skyrim is CPU dependent. So if you wanna play skyrim properly you should have an enough CPU to handle it.
@rocknroll980 You are asking a lot for people to figure out if your rig can run something on specific settings for a specific game, for a specific rig, with out a benchmark or anything.... Just pull up the games minimum requirements. You should also include OS. For example, vista is resource heavy, xp and 7 are not. Though I would expect pretty bad performance considering your specs. ddr2 ram is pretty slow and graphics cards go up to ddr5 (speed matters more than volume).
Hardware companies make so much money from us pc gamers, people are right there is not too much diference low setings look like consoles, high setings are there so we could give them money, the only game that does really look better when you crank up the setings is Crysis, and that game was ported on the console, if they force me to spend money just to be able to play a newer game, i can download games for free so fuck them all!
@Tactomanify Skyrim is release on steam only, good luck with that. The hardware honestly does not cost that much. For about 600-700 dollars you could probably build a fairly decent gaming pc if you really watch what you spend on. Very low end computers pre-built with a INTEGRATED (not real) graphics card run about 300-400. It is fairly reasonable because you could buy one of those pieces of junk put a 100-150 dollar graphics card and play MOST games on -max- settings.
@TheNyanShow People who have a display who can pick up on much much smaller details harder to see on lower end comps/displays that are not capable of portraying entirely what max settings in a game brings. For example, a crappy display, even with the backing of a high end graphics card, will look like trash, perhaps worse than trash. Trash with crisp lines, much worse. Vice-Versa. Plus if you don't have a very powerful computer, but you also dont have trash, you want to know what mid-range is!
@TheNyanShow Man there a huge difference..moss, wood grain, cloth texture, stone..everything.. you must not have watched this vid in HD or something. Or maybe your monitor is whack.
@TheNyanShow Man there a huge difference..moss, wood grain, cloth texture, stone..everything.. you must not have watched this vid in HD or something. Or maybe your monitor is whack.
@TheNyanShow it's because they made it for console first and then transfered it to pc. i think it should have been the other way around because now no matter how badass ur pc is, the graphics will still look just the same in any settings LOL which kind of sucks for pc gamers who really put heart and soul into making their pc's kick ass. my laptop plays witcher 2 on medium high settings and that game's graphics is crazy but this game's graphics, i expected better.
i have a an intel i5 core proccesor ati radeon 6490m radeon graphics card my computer my computer is a hp probook 4530s, could I run skyrim and if i can whats the highest grahpics that i can run it on without and lag plz comment really thinking of buying this game xD
i have a an intel i5 core proccesor ati radeon 6490m radeon graphics card my computer my computer is a hp probook 4530s, could I run skyrim and if i can whats the highest grahpics that i can run it on without and lag plz comment really thinking of buying this game xD
i have a an intel i5 core proccesor ati radeon 6490m radeon graphics card my computer my computer is a hp probook 4530s, could I run skyrim and if i can whats the highest grahpics that i can run it on without and lag plz comment really thinking of buying this game xD
i have a an intel i5 core proccesor ati radeon 6490m radeon graphics card my computer my computer is a hp probook 4530s, could I run skyrim and if i can whats the highest grahpics that i can run it on without and lag plz comment really thinking of buying this game xD
I have a ATI Radeon HD 4200 so I have to play on low settings. Is there anything I could do besides buying a new graphics card so I could play on medium at least? My computer has 4 cores with 8 gigs of ram.
@GamerGraphicsTV I have a radeon Hd6520g with 2GB Mem, i have 4gb ram, and a quad-core processor could i run this game at medium settings with no lagg?
@rockonwood007 LOL i also have 4200 in my laptop and i was wondering if i can run skyrim. Your comment gave me the answer. If it's playable i am fine with low settings. For me graphics ain't everything. But can you tell me how much fps you are getting ? Also your ram and processor please
@rockonwood007 great card to buy: radeon hd 6770 or hd 6670. Best bang for buck(or however u say it XD) i played skyrim on it 1600x900 max settings max distance with FXAA and 16AF, but without vsync and AA at newest version. Plays smooth all time, and not to tell how gorgeous and REALISTIC ultra looks like :)
@OpenGLSecond I bought a 6850HD on Newegg... at the time (few months ago) it was the best bang for your buck according to benchmarks. It was pretty affordable too, especially considering mine was one of the fancy ones. Runs really, really cool too. About 45C which is about 45C away from its thresh-hold (it can run up to 90C according to the specs before reaching a dangerous level) and that is with the fan running below 100%.
@666NedFlanders im using XP pro and I definitely need a whole different mobo for this game, videocard is ok for low settings, my processor is a bottleneck; pentium d 820
@rockonwood007 Number of cores does not always mean anything. A computer with fewer cores can often do as well as one with many. Also, most games will not utilize multiple cores and if they do it is only for small things. WOW was known to migrate from using just one core, to using a second core to run the music. In generally though, its usually the graphics card that holds the computer back. If you have multiple displays, use only one though as having more than adds stress on the graphics card.
I use a Radeon HD 3650 with low setting with a resolution of 800x500. Inside I get around 30fps-45fps, outside I get 30fps-40fps. I don't give a fuck if I have to play Skyrim in a window! I'm just happy I get to play it.
Hey, great vid but are you doing this with AA or FXAA, i want to know because when i turn AA x2 on (or x4,x8) i get 20-25 fps, when i turn it off (but with FXAA on) I get 40-50 fps - All of that on high settings(outside). I just want to know if there is a big difference between FXAA and AA
I can run this game with acceptable FPS at 1440x810 at High textures, low radial blur, shadows, high decal quantity, no antialising, no anisotropic flitering, no FXAA, no water reflections, minimal fade on all, distant object detail low, distant object fade checked on my Intel Dual Core 2.4 GHz 2 GB Ram 9500 GT PC. :( I need to get a new PC.
@GamerGraphicsTV you should really pick up morrowind and oblivion. but play morrowind first. its almost ancient but really. you will see what this game could have been. and why the modding community is so great in oblivion and hopefully skyrim
Thanks for the video. I have a setup similar to yours and was curious how high I could take it. I have a reference design 6950 2gb with unlocked shaders and a mild overclock, i7 2500k @ 5.0GHz, and 16GB Corsair Vengeance 1600ghz. Yep, overkill, but it's my game console, work station, business center, and home theater :)
@solarlightning I'm glad for you then. All I had to pay to play skyrim was 60 bucks. It didn't leave me with a hole in my wallet and it still looks gorgeous on my tv. Win/win.
@OdyseusGamingHD I started playing skyrim on my PC today on mid-high settings and I can a sure you its gorgeous. I have textures on high so those always look nice and way better than consoles.
@JFRKO93 There's really not much of a difference between Ultra and High to me. And having it at 50 is already good enough, the eye can't seem more than 30 fps. So don't go wasting your money for a higher card. But...if you really insist then you could get nividia's top card to date, GTX 590.
@RibuloseBiphosphate i think the eye cant see more than 45 fps not 30 because i notice battelfield 3 at 60fps and battelfield 3 on consoles (30fps) i can tell pc is more smooth
I could give two shits about how moss and rocks look lol. Only thing that gets me is the draw distance. This game could have the graphics of morrowind and i would still play it.
@TrevorEngage Mmmm thats cool and all but I prefer to get sucked in the atmosphere of the game and those detailed rocks do that for me even if they don't for you!
To run Skyrim even more better turn off everything including Steam if that's where you got it from and switch your computers performance to best it will look like Windows 2000 but its worth it.
@WraithXMetin You have enough RAM, and a good enough Nvidia card, but the processor is at the bare minimum, plus its on a laptop... you might get lucky and be able to run it on low settings, but i recommend getting a bit of a better processor first... i have 2GB RAM, dual core 2.30GHz, and about the same graphics card as you, and i can run on medium settings... so you should be find on low settings. Hope i helped :)
Wow, the graphics are actually pretty similar between Low and High. Little contrast here. Unlike in oblivion, where low graphics looked worse than Morrowind...
Can a 2.0 GHz Processor, 3GB RAM, 1.5 Gig CPU play this on Medium with the applied Performance mods at 800x600? As long as I get to play, I'll be fine. (Plus, the Can You Run It? Test said I passed.
@7GGonzalez Well, considering my specs are lower than yours and I could play Skyrim on low without anything modded, I'd say yes, but you may get some lag. May I recommend you google some "Skyrim Performance Mod, TESV Reduced Texture Pack, and Etc." Plus GameBooster to play?
@GamerGraphicsTV In preferred system requirements, it says CPU should be a quad-core, though I know for gaming it's preferable to have higher GHz than cores, how would having a 3.4 GHz dual-core with a Radeon XFX 6770 1GB and 4GB DDR2 memory deal with this game?
@ThePearce1994 well im not going to upgrade my gpu cause i just bought it but i havnt actually bought the processor yet and i think im gonna pay the extra 30$ for a quad core 3.0 Ghz amd athlon if i can find a better phenom i'll do that though
I've heard of mods that are supposed to overcharge the graphics to near realistic. I'll be getting £700 ($1,085) worth of parts at a near wholesale price as well. Hopefully I'll be able to run full ultra, and these supposed supper graphics mods. At least then there would be a worthy difference to the low setting.
@MetalPancakes Would you rather me show you outside where you cant see any texture changes and the lighting and shadows are so large you cant tell the difference?
I have a question, lets say i have 4gb of ram on my computer and i put in a 1gb video card in does that mean i will only have 3gb of ram on the computer?
@GamerGraphicsTV ok, thanks i wanted to know because i am getting the xfx gt520 1gb video card and i needed to know if i needed to upgrade my ram or not
I would like to build a computer to run Skyrim on ultra high can you help me please?
ScentofLaceration 2 hours ago
could i run this with:
2x core 2 duo @ 3ghz
ati radeon hd 4970
4gb ram
GnorfenGaming 3 days ago
@GnorfenGaming Possibly on low
GamerGraphicsTV 3 days ago
@GamerGraphicsTV thanks, i tryed it and got it to high 50+ fps
great videos btw, + 1 subscriber =)
GnorfenGaming 2 days ago
If you're into TMNT, I hope you have watched the film "Turtles Forever" :)
Daghead 3 days ago
I see that you're using a 6950. I'm about to get a 6850 and then upgrade to two 6850's next month.
Is the 6950 good?
Jiakurai 1 week ago
@Jiakurai Best card I have ever used, it is very good and very powerful.
GamerGraphicsTV 1 week ago
@GamerGraphicsTV I'll have to get that one later. The 6850 is what I'm getting, and I'm just gonna upgrade to two later. Buying a PC because I'm done with the console community. Thanks for the reply
Jiakurai 1 week ago
@Jiakurai no problem
GamerGraphicsTV 1 week ago
@GamerGraphicsTV do you think it is a good idea to build ur own computer over the internet and git shipped and im thinking of alienware
lloodyMurda 1 week ago
@lloodyMurda I think it is a good idea to buy parts online and build the system yourself yes. Alienware on the other hand you end up paying a lot more for their custom cases and logos. I would steer clear of them in my opinion.
GamerGraphicsTV 1 week ago
i could play it on low settings thats not to shabby
Yomamacrank 1 week ago
Best skyrim comparison ive seen on youtube.
ironlunatic1 2 weeks ago
@ironlunatic1 Thanks, I try my hardest to be the best at what I do.
GamerGraphicsTV 2 weeks ago 3
@GamerGraphicsTV Your the best at what you do, and what you do is put the consoles in it's place. THATS MAH JOB! >:O
Lol, kidding. Hey I play Skyrim on my Laptop here's my specs, is it a suprise that it works? :/
HP Pavilion dv5 Notebook PC
AMD Turion(TM) II P540 Dual-Core Processor 2.40 GHz 4.00 GB (3.74 GB usable of Ram)
64-bit Operating System
mralan72799 1 week ago
When you actually do a comparrison of low settings and ultra settings when looking at the wall or trees or w/e, you can see big differences, but when you just play the game normally its hard to even tell whats better or not.
TeeFastTeeFurious 2 weeks ago
Skyrim is ugly in low settings ..
MisteerGaga 2 weeks ago
I'm currently running on
Intel Core 2 Duo @ 2.4GHz
nVidia 9600m GT 512MB of VRAM
Kingston 8GB DDR3 RAM @ 1066MHz
Windows 7 32-bit
will it be enough to even run Skyrim mid to low settings at 1440x900?
Thanks
OMFGWTFBBQSAUCEHAX 2 weeks ago
@OMFGWTFBBQSAUCEHAX Yes, but maybe not at 60 frames per second.
torridsaber 2 weeks ago
@OMFGWTFBBQSAUCEHAX Easily!
DropGraphix 2 weeks ago in playlist Season 1
@OMFGWTFBBQSAUCEHAX yeh i have a 9500gt and rest of the rig is pretty much the same. I did have issues the 1st time around but bethesda came out with patches, i updated my drivers and now i can play this game on max resolution with high settings with barely any lags or freezes, crazy shit lol
Youngbling76 1 week ago
How much, roughly, did this / would this cost to make - or, in other words - how much would it cost me to make a gaming PC of the same specs as this (broadly) but possibly with slightly different, cheaper components?
Thanks
greenbl0b 2 weeks ago
Ok so to all you geeks who know your s**t, is the xbox 360 graphics setting the same as low settings on a pc because it looks to me like the 360 graphics are better than the zero detail moss shown on this vid of pc low settings.
SuperMangn 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Could I run this on low on my computer: i3 processor Graphics Card: Family HD Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit. Its a sony VIAO please help!
r1cht0f3nrocks 3 weeks ago
I bet I could actually play this on a notebook as well. will work I think. I give a shit at graphics, the skill system and the story is important.
9inchitaly 3 weeks ago
There's a huge difference between low settings run on a powerful computer, and low settings on a computer that can barely even manage that. Putting my tiny FPS aside, my game looks like Morrowind on lowest using my laptop. Looking forward to playing it on a new PC soon.
Pattuq 3 weeks ago
lol, the difference is like night and day. Tbh though, I can't see much of a difference between high and ultra in this game.
Makaveli456 3 weeks ago
I have a Acer Predator G Seriers, specs:
Windows 7 64-bit
2nd gen i7 2600k 3.4 GHz
nVidia Geforce 550 Ti
8 GB of ram
Going to buy Skyrim soon but would I need to buy another Geforce 560 Ti to play it on high/ultra in high FPS?
Please reply GamersGraphics, your videos are great.
NJditt 4 weeks ago
what settings can i run this game on with:
4gigs of RAM
AMD Athlon II X3 450AM
Nvidia G210
Zevan12 1 month ago
@Zevan12 Low settings most likely, to play a high demanding game such as Skyrim you need a good Graphics card, i recommend turning off the high demanding settings such as AA and shadows, this can gain you quite a lot of fps, but it's also a good idea to look into a new graphics card because it will save you from spending more money in the future on upgrades to play games on decent settings, the Nvidia GTX 560 and 570 are good, the 560 is under £200 and is a powerful card:)
Night0pz 4 days ago
the differences aren't that bad, you can still play on low graphics and have tons of fun, makes me happy that they put effort for those with regular pc's not just ultra gaming supercomputers (though i'm saving to get one of those anyways :P) awesomeness :D
milumact1 1 month ago
I don't see any difference
CloudDecim 1 month ago
Mods bitches!
ThePhil4all 1 month ago
Speaking of settings, what audio level did you record this at? I have my shit cranked up just to hear you talking.
abergethirty 1 month ago
@abergethirty This one is low, I admit, the settings must have been messed up when I did it. Sorry about that.
GamerGraphicsTV 1 month ago
Ultra settings is 90% dependent on the CPU power not the GPU. If we compare High to Ultra, there is not a single difference in the textures, but the draw distance is absolutely improved, so the game looks much prettier. I have Intel Dual Core E5700 and HD 5670 and I play it on High at around 38FPS average, but as soon as I shift to Ultra, the FPS become on 5 !!!. This explains that how much Skyrim is CPU dependent. So if you wanna play skyrim properly you should have an enough CPU to handle it.
mrcrazyenough007 1 month ago
watched in 1080p and jizzed on my keyboard
hotkarlisgood 1 month ago
Too bad he did not have a computer to Medium Graphic: :( :( :( :(
More Works in Low and Medium Shadow: P '---'
dylan4021 1 month ago
could it work on lowest on dual core 1.5 ghz (3) and 2 gb ram on my piece of shit toaster?
lolpl0000 1 month ago
How do I swith settings from high to low and vice versa?
ikke471 1 month ago
@ikke471 When you open de game, it will show a screen saying " Play, Option, Tech Support..."
Click in Options and set the " Detail " level to whatever you want, and there you go !
Matheusnightwish 1 month ago
Could I run this (on lowest texture and poly settings, and low draw distance) with: HD 4670 1GB ddr3, 2GB ddr2 RAM, and a Pentium D 820 2.8 ghz?
rocknroll980 1 month ago
@rocknroll980 You are asking a lot for people to figure out if your rig can run something on specific settings for a specific game, for a specific rig, with out a benchmark or anything.... Just pull up the games minimum requirements. You should also include OS. For example, vista is resource heavy, xp and 7 are not. Though I would expect pretty bad performance considering your specs. ddr2 ram is pretty slow and graphics cards go up to ddr5 (speed matters more than volume).
666NedFlanders 1 month ago
Hardware companies make so much money from us pc gamers, people are right there is not too much diference low setings look like consoles, high setings are there so we could give them money, the only game that does really look better when you crank up the setings is Crysis, and that game was ported on the console, if they force me to spend money just to be able to play a newer game, i can download games for free so fuck them all!
Tactomanify 1 month ago
@Tactomanify Skyrim is release on steam only, good luck with that. The hardware honestly does not cost that much. For about 600-700 dollars you could probably build a fairly decent gaming pc if you really watch what you spend on. Very low end computers pre-built with a INTEGRATED (not real) graphics card run about 300-400. It is fairly reasonable because you could buy one of those pieces of junk put a 100-150 dollar graphics card and play MOST games on -max- settings.
666NedFlanders 1 month ago
Question does the start if them game always start really slow? or is just my computer?
OfficialJaredMiIton 1 month ago
low setting is still better than console. its sad
kopk888 1 month ago
i dont really see that much difference between low and high except for the moss, but who gives a fuck about moss anyway :)
TheNyanShow 1 month ago
@TheNyanShow Its not about the moss really, it is just an example of the texture change.
GamerGraphicsTV 1 month ago
@GamerGraphicsTV AMD Radeon HD 6770M
Intel Core i7-2670QM Processor
8192 MB Can I Run It? PLEASE REPLY:D Great Vid.. Subed
ABCDavid96 3 weeks ago
@ABCDavid96 Look at Can you run it: ht tp : // w ww.system requirementslab. c om/cyri/intro.aspx (Remove spaces)
WarfareGameZ 2 weeks ago
@TheNyanShow People who have a display who can pick up on much much smaller details harder to see on lower end comps/displays that are not capable of portraying entirely what max settings in a game brings. For example, a crappy display, even with the backing of a high end graphics card, will look like trash, perhaps worse than trash. Trash with crisp lines, much worse. Vice-Versa. Plus if you don't have a very powerful computer, but you also dont have trash, you want to know what mid-range is!
666NedFlanders 1 month ago
@TheNyanShow Man there a huge difference..moss, wood grain, cloth texture, stone..everything.. you must not have watched this vid in HD or something. Or maybe your monitor is whack.
zoik333 1 month ago
@TheNyanShow Man there a huge difference..moss, wood grain, cloth texture, stone..everything.. you must not have watched this vid in HD or something. Or maybe your monitor is whack.
zoik333 1 month ago 3
@TheNyanShow it's because they made it for console first and then transfered it to pc. i think it should have been the other way around because now no matter how badass ur pc is, the graphics will still look just the same in any settings LOL which kind of sucks for pc gamers who really put heart and soul into making their pc's kick ass. my laptop plays witcher 2 on medium high settings and that game's graphics is crazy but this game's graphics, i expected better.
KakashiHatake2121 1 month ago
will i be able to use ultra high settings on my new pc arriving in a few days?:
AMD FX 4100 AM3+ Quad core 3.6Ghz
4GB RAM
Nvidia GTX 550 TI 1 GB PCI-E Graphics Card
neeson3k 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i have a an intel i5 core proccesor ati radeon 6490m radeon graphics card my computer my computer is a hp probook 4530s, could I run skyrim and if i can whats the highest grahpics that i can run it on without and lag plz comment really thinking of buying this game xD
cocolibby 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i have a an intel i5 core proccesor ati radeon 6490m radeon graphics card my computer my computer is a hp probook 4530s, could I run skyrim and if i can whats the highest grahpics that i can run it on without and lag plz comment really thinking of buying this game xD
cocolibby 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i have a an intel i5 core proccesor ati radeon 6490m radeon graphics card my computer my computer is a hp probook 4530s, could I run skyrim and if i can whats the highest grahpics that i can run it on without and lag plz comment really thinking of buying this game xD
cocolibby 1 month ago
i have a an intel i5 core proccesor ati radeon 6490m radeon graphics card my computer my computer is a hp probook 4530s, could I run skyrim and if i can whats the highest grahpics that i can run it on without and lag plz comment really thinking of buying this game xD
cocolibby 1 month ago
I am surprised that I can run skyrim on high settings on my laptop! i5-460m, HD 5650, 4 gigs of ddr3 ram. 30-60fps outside, 50+ inside! amazing.
WoWFMages 1 month ago
I have a ATI Radeon HD 4200 so I have to play on low settings. Is there anything I could do besides buying a new graphics card so I could play on medium at least? My computer has 4 cores with 8 gigs of ram.
rockonwood007 1 month ago
@rockonwood007 the 4200 is your bottleneck. Get a better card and the game will work great. Other than that I see nothing you can improve, sorry.
GamerGraphicsTV 1 month ago
@GamerGraphicsTV Ok...I can spend $50 - $75. Maybe $100, any suggestions?
rockonwood007 1 month ago
@GamerGraphicsTV I have a radeon Hd6520g with 2GB Mem, i have 4gb ram, and a quad-core processor could i run this game at medium settings with no lagg?
xtramodz4life 2 weeks ago
@rockonwood007 LOL i also have 4200 in my laptop and i was wondering if i can run skyrim. Your comment gave me the answer. If it's playable i am fine with low settings. For me graphics ain't everything. But can you tell me how much fps you are getting ? Also your ram and processor please
WarHawk215 1 month ago
@rockonwood007 great card to buy: radeon hd 6770 or hd 6670. Best bang for buck(or however u say it XD) i played skyrim on it 1600x900 max settings max distance with FXAA and 16AF, but without vsync and AA at newest version. Plays smooth all time, and not to tell how gorgeous and REALISTIC ultra looks like :)
OpenGLSecond 1 month ago
@OpenGLSecond I bought a 6850HD on Newegg... at the time (few months ago) it was the best bang for your buck according to benchmarks. It was pretty affordable too, especially considering mine was one of the fancy ones. Runs really, really cool too. About 45C which is about 45C away from its thresh-hold (it can run up to 90C according to the specs before reaching a dangerous level) and that is with the fan running below 100%.
666NedFlanders 1 month ago
@666NedFlanders im using XP pro and I definitely need a whole different mobo for this game, videocard is ok for low settings, my processor is a bottleneck; pentium d 820
rocknroll980 1 month ago
@rockonwood007 Number of cores does not always mean anything. A computer with fewer cores can often do as well as one with many. Also, most games will not utilize multiple cores and if they do it is only for small things. WOW was known to migrate from using just one core, to using a second core to run the music. In generally though, its usually the graphics card that holds the computer back. If you have multiple displays, use only one though as having more than adds stress on the graphics card.
666NedFlanders 1 month ago
@rockonwood007 I'm after a new rig with a radeon HD 6670, you can pick them up for under $100 and it should be able to bump you up to medium.
tendoking48 1 month ago
I use a Radeon HD 3650 with low setting with a resolution of 800x500. Inside I get around 30fps-45fps, outside I get 30fps-40fps. I don't give a fuck if I have to play Skyrim in a window! I'm just happy I get to play it.
spizec 1 month ago
Hey, great vid but are you doing this with AA or FXAA, i want to know because when i turn AA x2 on (or x4,x8) i get 20-25 fps, when i turn it off (but with FXAA on) I get 40-50 fps - All of that on high settings(outside). I just want to know if there is a big difference between FXAA and AA
m0nowheR 1 month ago
I can run this game with acceptable FPS at 1440x810 at High textures, low radial blur, shadows, high decal quantity, no antialising, no anisotropic flitering, no FXAA, no water reflections, minimal fade on all, distant object detail low, distant object fade checked on my Intel Dual Core 2.4 GHz 2 GB Ram 9500 GT PC. :( I need to get a new PC.
GrandvisionStudio 1 month ago
Is 2.20GHz (8 CPUs) 2.2GHz good for running games at Ultra?
z0mBiExHD 1 month ago
@z0mBiExHD i play skyrim with 2.2ghz with ultra, but u need a good graphics card to cover the missing ghz
TheNyanShow 1 month ago
im playing this with a 3.4GHz single core and 1gb of ram with a 6800GS graphics card...dual core two gigs my ass!
dbspaceoditty 1 month ago
its his first TES game...he didnt even know...didnt seem like he believes that the game never ends.....
dbspaceoditty 1 month ago
@dbspaceoditty This is true
GamerGraphicsTV 1 month ago
@GamerGraphicsTV you should really pick up morrowind and oblivion. but play morrowind first. its almost ancient but really. you will see what this game could have been. and why the modding community is so great in oblivion and hopefully skyrim
dbspaceoditty 1 month ago
Thanks for the video. I have a setup similar to yours and was curious how high I could take it. I have a reference design 6950 2gb with unlocked shaders and a mild overclock, i7 2500k @ 5.0GHz, and 16GB Corsair Vengeance 1600ghz. Yep, overkill, but it's my game console, work station, business center, and home theater :)
StephenP2003 1 month ago
funny how it looks almost the same as on 360.
TranceForLyfe 1 month ago
@TranceForLyfe i have 360 and a pc i can play ultra high and it looks 20x better than 360
solarlightning 1 month ago
@solarlightning I'm glad for you then. All I had to pay to play skyrim was 60 bucks. It didn't leave me with a hole in my wallet and it still looks gorgeous on my tv. Win/win.
TranceForLyfe 1 month ago
@TranceForLyfe i play skyrim on my 360 not pc just cuz i started on the 360 and already finished the main quest
solarlightning 1 month ago
outdoor settings would have been nice
rhcp500 1 month ago
If I change my settings low to max or max to low I still have the SAME FPS what gives ??
69MadeByMe69 1 month ago
it's fully playable at low settings .... for me it's all about perfect FPS the game must be smooth rather than look ultra.
superford500 1 month ago
Does anybody knows if skyrim on low-medium settings looks as the consoles graphically talking?
thing is i have skyrim on ps3 but will get it on PC soon, not sure if its worth playing it on low medium settings on PC.
OdyseusGamingHD 1 month ago
@OdyseusGamingHD I started playing skyrim on my PC today on mid-high settings and I can a sure you its gorgeous. I have textures on high so those always look nice and way better than consoles.
hellzofwar 1 month ago
I tried playing this on my old gaming pc
2.8g ddr4
gtx9800
Anthlon 64 X2
Had a very hard time on low settings
sonzothewise 1 month ago
what card would i need to run this on ultra with a smooth 60fps?
i have the NVIDA gtx 560ti which runs it at about 50 fps min on ultra maxed. and higher than 60fps on high.
JFRKO93 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@JFRKO93 There's really not much of a difference between Ultra and High to me. And having it at 50 is already good enough, the eye can't seem more than 30 fps. So don't go wasting your money for a higher card. But...if you really insist then you could get nividia's top card to date, GTX 590.
RibuloseBiphosphate 1 month ago
@RibuloseBiphosphate see*
RibuloseBiphosphate 1 month ago
@RibuloseBiphosphate i think the eye cant see more than 45 fps not 30 because i notice battelfield 3 at 60fps and battelfield 3 on consoles (30fps) i can tell pc is more smooth
JFRKO93 1 month ago
@JFRKO93 Yeah, I have console BF3 for 360. Generally you'll mostly just noticed that its much more smooth and that's about it.
RibuloseBiphosphate 1 month ago
Holy crap it still looks good on low quality, fml I should've gotten it for PC instead of PS3, oh well :P
Kriskazam 1 month ago
Why are the buttons shown for a 360 controller? Were you playing with one?
Zeezy 1 month ago
Hey, I'm wondering if this will hold up on Ultra:
ASRock Z68 Extreme3 Gen3
i5 2500K Sandybridge
8GB Ripjaw
Radeon HD 6850 1GB
Win7 Ultimate x64
I'll overclock with a 650W PSU.
estien11 2 months ago
@estien11 yes it will run ultra smoothly
SR7l 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Windows XP
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz (2 CPUs)
2048MB RAM
NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS
What settings will I be able to run for Skyrim?
Gvannor 2 months ago
I could give two shits about how moss and rocks look lol. Only thing that gets me is the draw distance. This game could have the graphics of morrowind and i would still play it.
TrevorEngage 2 months ago 13
@TrevorEngage Im happy for you, everyone has their own opinion.
GamerGraphicsTV 2 months ago 16
@TrevorEngage Mmmm thats cool and all but I prefer to get sucked in the atmosphere of the game and those detailed rocks do that for me even if they don't for you!
LJMMLG 1 month ago
@TrevorEngage
WRONG. You *couldn't give two shits about how moss and rocks look lol.
Edge0fPain 1 month ago
To run Skyrim even more better turn off everything including Steam if that's where you got it from and switch your computers performance to best it will look like Windows 2000 but its worth it.
snuckles108 2 months ago
what settings is skyrim sett to on the xbox version??
thenerdyminecrafter 2 months ago
@thenerdyminecrafter medium or low high
matt4jeff 2 months ago
@matt4jeff actually, it's high-ultra from what I've seen, just at a lower native res than PC's 1080p (probably 720p).
angleisthebest 2 months ago
Hey, can you tell me if i can run Skyrim on my laptop?
Intel Pentium Dual Core T4200 2x 2.00GHz
Nvidia Geforce 9400M G 1,4GB
3GB ram DDR3
Thanks
WraithXMetin 2 months ago
@WraithXMetin You have enough RAM, and a good enough Nvidia card, but the processor is at the bare minimum, plus its on a laptop... you might get lucky and be able to run it on low settings, but i recommend getting a bit of a better processor first... i have 2GB RAM, dual core 2.30GHz, and about the same graphics card as you, and i can run on medium settings... so you should be find on low settings. Hope i helped :)
18pluskiddo 2 months ago
@rommelpk My PC can run it so your can too XD I play at 1024x768 without lag and got 2GB ram and an ATI Readon 2300HD :D
GibboneVision 2 months ago
@GibboneVision thank you very much :)
rommelpk 2 months ago
hey can anyone tell me if my computer can play skyrim
windows7 64bit
amd dual core a4-3400apu with amd radeon hd 6410d
1gb vga memory
1tb hard drive
4gb ram
rommelpk 2 months ago
yay im gunna test this game today its gunna lag i have to ask am i saying gunna wrong ?. refering to going to right (gunna)
thunderbolt997 2 months ago 2
@thunderbolt997 gunna works, I usually say gonna :)
GamerGraphicsTV 2 months ago
omg i love your wallpaper. where'd u get it from?
tiggsbabe 2 months ago
@tiggsbabe Don't remember the artists site exactly, I got the full list of pics from one of the posts on thechive though.
GamerGraphicsTV 2 months ago
You took an arrow to the knee. After hearing that story again, you took an arrow to your other knee.
DeadFoxMS89 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Can i run this game?
Intel Pentinium Dual Core E6300 2.8GHz
Nvidia 460 GTX 1GB
4GB RAM
Windows 7 32Bit
Valiciak 2 months ago
Comment removed
Valiciak 2 months ago
The game automatically put me on High settings, can i still switch to ultra just to see if the performance drops to really noticeable levels?
depture 2 months ago
@depture Of course, you can change the settings to anything you like. The performance will change with each setting you change,
GamerGraphicsTV 2 months ago
can I run the game on my pc?
I have:
6700@2,66Ghz 2,67 Ghz
Ram 2GB
32 bits
Intel(R) Core (TM) 2CPU
thats all I can see :/
Please answer, I really like to know if I'm able to play it or not.
000Z9A 2 months ago
@000Z9A Barely you could have a very laggy game at lowest settings. Its hard for my 4gb's of ram can barely handle it.
hugh705 2 months ago
@000Z9A I would say u need atleast 4GB ram, and to be on 64 bit and its mainly to do with your Graphics card.
JustConkeh 2 months ago
my computer runs at 10 fps with lowest possible settings -_-
I know and im working on getting a new graphics card alright!
Norocmorth 2 months ago
Wow, the graphics are actually pretty similar between Low and High. Little contrast here. Unlike in oblivion, where low graphics looked worse than Morrowind...
63chicago6 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol lets test out the graphics on max....in a cave thats mostly black
Armaker21 2 months ago
how well will my system run it:
3,6 quad core
radeon 6770
8 gigs of ram?
laughingatyouforever 2 months ago
can my laptop play skryim? amd turion 2 dualcore mobile m520 2.3ghz
ram 2gb(1.75 useable)
ati mobility radeon hd4200 962mb
can i run it without lag on the lowest settings? i dun wanna waste my money paying for sumting i cant play... :(
akuroxas 2 months ago
so this video demonstrates console version vs PC version?
Johonywuzhere 2 months ago
low settings look pretty good actually
ClickClackPLOWW 2 months ago
Can a 2.0 GHz Processor, 3GB RAM, 1.5 Gig CPU play this on Medium with the applied Performance mods at 800x600? As long as I get to play, I'll be fine. (Plus, the Can You Run It? Test said I passed.
RowsdowerZapp 2 months ago
i have a gts 250, 3gb of ram, 126 gb of freespace still after using some, some kinda foxconn motherboard....
my question is... can i run this game? i rllllllllllllllllly want it, and need answers immediately. please!
DeadFoxMS89 2 months ago
if i can play farcry 2 can i play this??? please answer thanks!
Doiclo 2 months ago
Mac = Working
Windows = Gaming.
blutundeisen 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
can i run this game on my laptop?
core 2 duo 2.2ghz T6600
Nvidia Geforce G210m
4gb RAM
windows 7 premuim 64bit
cardinal151515 2 months ago
Do you think I can run skyrim on low resolution and low settings with these specs:
Processor:Amd v120 2.2ghz
Ram:8gb
GPU:ATI radeon 4250
PS: I can run oblivion on high settings (no antlilashing)
7GGonzalez 2 months ago
@7GGonzalez Well, considering my specs are lower than yours and I could play Skyrim on low without anything modded, I'd say yes, but you may get some lag. May I recommend you google some "Skyrim Performance Mod, TESV Reduced Texture Pack, and Etc." Plus GameBooster to play?
RowsdowerZapp 2 months ago
Do u think that this PC could run Skyrim at High resolution without framerate?
Intel-core 2 Duo CPU P8700 2,53 GHz
4 GB DDR3 RAM
NVIDIA GeForce GT240M Cuda 1GB
Windows 7 64 bits
Thx for your attention.
headshotmanyac 2 months ago
use your pip boy light !
BashFeri1 2 months ago
you know fuck it ill stick to consoles
BrickArts295 2 months ago
@BrickArts295 You stick with the consoles gtfo LAPTOPS PC,S
TheMarcusman14 2 months ago in playlist Season 1
hey could you help me please?
here's my computer spec, do you recon i could run skyrim?
ATHLON 4800 TOWER PC
2GB DDR2 RAM
250GB HDD
512MB 8400GS VGA
AMD Phenom(tm) 2 X3 710 Processor 2.60 GHz
32-bit Operating System
Windows 7
w1tchw2tch 2 months ago
@w1tchw2tch buy 2x2 gigabytes of corsair valueselect ram and replace it with your current ram it should fit and your pc will be alot faster
skaterdude1998 2 months ago
@skaterdude1998 alright cheers man i'll look into it
w1tchw2tch 2 months ago
if i can run oblivion on max 1080p can i run skyrim on low 1080p
THEDARKRIFLE 2 months ago
@THEDARKRIFLE I am not sure to be honest I have never played Oblivion, although from what I have heard yes you can.
GamerGraphicsTV 2 months ago
Would an i5 and a gt 430 with 8 gb ram play this on medium or high?
SupaPichu 2 months ago
Think a 2.8Ghz quad-core, 6GB PC1800 DDR ram, and GTX 470 could max Skyrim at 1680x1050?
irllcd13 2 months ago
@irllcd13 yes
GamerGraphicsTV 2 months ago
@GamerGraphicsTV In preferred system requirements, it says CPU should be a quad-core, though I know for gaming it's preferable to have higher GHz than cores, how would having a 3.4 GHz dual-core with a Radeon XFX 6770 1GB and 4GB DDR2 memory deal with this game?
Danorowski 2 months ago
i just bought 6 things to basically rebuild my pc, it was originally a hp pavilion a6112n and the specs now are :
AMD Athlon II X2 260 Regor 3.2GHz
Asus ATI Radeon HD6450 Silence 1 GB DDR3
Corsair Memory 4GB
ASRock A770DE+
Windows 7 64-bit
What setting could i run Skyrim on and how many fps?
skaterdude1998 2 months ago
@skaterdude1998 probably low to medium settings with most of the fade distances low
ThePearce1994 2 months ago
@ThePearce1994 is there anything i could upgrade that'll make it better? i actually have 6GB of ram i accidently put 4 in the comment
skaterdude1998 2 months ago
@skaterdude1998 and you cant have 6gb of ram since athlon ii cpu's dont support dual channel ram
IamTheJesusGuy 2 months ago
@skaterdude1998 you could maybe think about upgrading your processor or upgrading to gts 460 or 560
ThePearce1994 2 months ago
@ThePearce1994 well im not going to upgrade my gpu cause i just bought it but i havnt actually bought the processor yet and i think im gonna pay the extra 30$ for a quad core 3.0 Ghz amd athlon if i can find a better phenom i'll do that though
skaterdude1998 2 months ago
@skaterdude1998 you could run it on quite high settings since the game is meant to run on consoles
IamTheJesusGuy 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I've heard of mods that are supposed to overcharge the graphics to near realistic. I'll be getting £700 ($1,085) worth of parts at a near wholesale price as well. Hopefully I'll be able to run full ultra, and these supposed supper graphics mods. At least then there would be a worthy difference to the low setting.
7heAre7s 2 months ago
Comment removed
7heAre7s 2 months ago
Comment removed
7heAre7s 2 months ago
lol lets test out the graphics on max....in a cave thats mostly black
MetalPancakes 2 months ago
@MetalPancakes Would you rather me show you outside where you cant see any texture changes and the lighting and shadows are so large you cant tell the difference?
GamerGraphicsTV 2 months ago 8
I have a question, lets say i have 4gb of ram on my computer and i put in a 1gb video card in does that mean i will only have 3gb of ram on the computer?
mariomaster233 2 months ago
@mariomaster233 No, they are completely separate.
GamerGraphicsTV 2 months ago
@GamerGraphicsTV ok, thanks i wanted to know because i am getting the xfx gt520 1gb video card and i needed to know if i needed to upgrade my ram or not
mariomaster233 2 months ago
good to know that it's not all that different, I'm pretty sure my computer couldn't play this on high settings.
chickenfrend 2 months ago
I've got a question : With what amount of money do i get a high resolution pc ??
halospartan199 2 months ago