Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • If someone have hes book "Not In His Image" and are willing to share it please give me a shout.

  • I disagree with his assertion that Mars is/was incompatible with life.

  • he certainly has a high opinion of himself

  • cool!

  • interesting stuff, but that reverb effect on the speech is over the top and very annoying..

  • Psycho

  • Comment removed

  • I would love to see what John has to say about the galactic core explosions that allegdly occur every 13,000 years or so, as discussed by Dr Paul Laviolette that i respect highly. How does the Galactic Superwave fit into what is discussed?

  • John is unknowingly admitting people are stupid (which contradicts his belief that the archons dont control us as some people think) because he gets hung up on how Icke or others inform people of the annunaki etc, saying that it's dangerous disinfo. Well, it is expected, JOHN, that people are to think for THEMSELVES! He's got great info, but a bit onedimensional and lazy observations, hence the lazy conclusions and accusations about Icke and others.

  • By john saying this info is dangerous is the same as saying that people are too stupid to not fall for it, THEREFOR contradicting himself, by basically saying that we're easily controlled. I hope this is understood

  • he says they can spread a story that they can control us, do you really think ONE story is gonna make people buy into the belief that these aliens can control them? I think John takes that aspect of the gnostic writings a bit literally. What they mean by "they failed to take over us, control us fully" is that they cant FULLY ruin us, we will always prevail. BUT we did get a genetic manipulation, and we are enslaved but mainly cuz of how we view ourselves.

  • this interview was a DIVINE EXPERIMENT

  • That japanese myth about orion is just like that of the sirius myth of the dogons.

  • so if people take Icke's, Tsarion's and others portrayal of the archons/illuminati as being all powerful and so superior and genius masterminds, then it's actually THEIR problem and not Icke's or Tsarion (Although I'm speaking mostly for Icke here because I'm more familiar with his work) because they haven't portrayed the manipulators in the way John said they tend to do but it's understandable if lazyminded people end up INTERPRETING what they say about the manipulators as being geniuses etc

  • Great info, great everything, appreciate this upload, just have to point out the lazy and disprespectful comment John did regarding David Icke of how people like and Tsarion among others tend to portray the Archons as being masterminds, geniuses that can calculate the most complex schemes etc. It's actually the total opposite, I can't tell how many times I've heard Icke saying that "they're clever but not wise", that they can only manipulate people in boxes because they too are in their box.

  • it's very interesting how john makes that sealed cabinet with gloves analogy because it's the EXACT same David Icke uses.

  • This has to be the best interview I've heard from Lash. It really strikes the chords of truth.

    However, I'd like to call him out on his topical critique of the extensive mythological research done by Michael Tsarion. "They" do in fact possess full knowledge of the Anthropos, and you're having me on if you're going to tell me that one way or another our genetics are untouched. Pure and utter faith-based assumption.

    How about the process of suggestion? We're the Anthropos, we can do anything.

  • @LordShivasServant perhaps your suggestion that they aren't is "Pure and utter faith-based assumption" given that Lash is adamant the Annunaki material is Archonic disinfo?

  • @AlanWattParrot I'm sorry, do you want to take another shot at that? I'm missing the context from what you typed.

    I don't care what Lash is adamant about. Why should that concern me? That's a matter for opinion, and I don't see how that effects anything else he says or any beliefs I may or may not hold.

    What's your point?

  • @LordShivasServant the context is clear as a bell - my point segues yours

  • @AlanWattParrot No, actually, it wasn't. I had to call "reinforcements", ask them to check.

    It's broken English. Now you can claim to the contrary, or you could elucidate your point. Depends where you want this conversation to go.

  • @LordShivasServant i'll select your first option as it really couldn't be any clearer and leave it there, cheers. 

  • @AlanWattParrot haha have a good'un

  • archon subplot? to my understanding archons are a type of AI...? 

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more