If you want to know what this video is about, please look at the Encyclopedia Dramatica entry for Randomlaughingman aka Clara Massa. For Example “So the denier flies come a-swarming
Still dribberling the same old shit
Thermometers show the earth is warming
it's a fact their "facts" dudn't fit”
bernzeppi Aka Clara the rhymer
Not exactly intelligent discussion about climate change.
After initializing and parametrizing hundreds of unknown factors, inserting divergent proxy data and ignoring any difficult natural forcing factors,we ran hundreds of simulations until we obtained the results we wanted–an ensemble of meaningless projected results,which we then averaged. We utilized the liberally unprincipled component method to homogenize and sensitize this to produce a new hockey stick,which gave a very robust prediction (95% probability) that we are all being totally screwed.
You don't need a hockey stick to prove that a billion vehicles emit more CO2 than 1; that a million factories emit more CO2 than 1; that less trees recycle less CO2 than more; and that if this trend continues we will be in deep, deep, shit.
You sound worried; in this case you'd better talk to the Chinese, who are the world's biggest emitters and by 2050 will be responsible for the majority of man-made CO2 in the atmosphere. Good luck with that.
Your implication is that I'm a novice who has just jumped onto the green bandwagon. I'm well aware of the Chinese situation as I am every other nation on this planet. And No, talking to the Chinese unilaterally is not the answer: this is a worldwide problem.
As for worries. I know the science, 'understand' the science. And like every other person who understands, there are good reasons to be worried.
However, for those who still want to press ahead with useless and horribly expensive CO2 cuts, you are only playing at it unless you get China (and India) to CUT their emisssions.
I understand the science fully; I have examined both sides.
Unfortunately, one side (yours) is not just about the science. This has lead to many of the old climate scientists and all of the 'new' climate scientists who came into the field recently (once the money was there) cooking the data, trying to validate models, faking graphs to support their hypothesis, trying to discredit any opposing views ect ect.
Everyone knows it has warmed in the last 150 years-so what?
The point is that is there is no evidence for catastrophic climate change, caused by humans.
This red herring that is contimually thrown up about warmest on 'record' I mean, so what? That is not causality. We are talking about science now, not imagination or models.
The human temperature record is too short to assess climate changes. The small temperature change we have had are not unusual
Polls show that only 10.8% of the AGW climate scientists describe themslves as "not being an environmental activist".
This means that their 'science' is naturtally coloured by their environmental views, and so cannot be trusted-as we have seen from climategate
All the climate change science produced for the IPCC therefore needs to be checked several times by competent and impartial scientists to ensure it has been done according to the scientific method.
As for "Climategate" - a term coined by the disingenuous NON SCIENTIFIC Telegraph hack James Delingpole when deliberately inventing an enemy to counter his very self-centred RIGHT WING view of the universe - we discover how the aforementioned used lots of spin on certain words to make it look like something untoward was happening.
Of course it wasn't & the people involved have since been vindicated.
Thanks again ElasticJesusRez for making this video to raise awareness about climate change and for also showing how deniers and their sock accounts abuse people (such as myself) and others.
The climate models are not actually models you know they are spherical crystal devices that when the climatologists hands are laid on them a swirling mist reveals what will be happening in the future
@TheElasticJesusRez No Clara, the Climate modelers are not really scientists, they are prophets spouting gloom & doom prophecies for their Wall St carbon mafia Global Warm-mongers. Get some rest Pam.
Continued thanks for making this video and raising awareness about climate change and about the astroturf mob the deniers create online (regarding youtube, it's mostly one denier with countless denier sock puppet accounts).
Thanks very much for helping and a Happy New Year to you as well. ;)
I've been blocked by another Idiot. This time Peekay22 with his IDIOTS GUIDE TO GLOBAL WARMING. Ha! Never a truer word spoken.
But anyway to the point. GOOGLE. if this Right-wing banner boy for NON FREE SPEECH is allowed to BLOCK ME, then why the FUCK should I have to give him a plug --------------->
Get this grotesque IDIOT off my page and put him on the AlexJones/Koch/NWO Aliens have landed on Sydney Harbour Bridge page.
Continued thanks for making this video, in order to raise awareness about climate change, man-made, and for the abuse the vested interests do to people who want to speak out about it.
Yep! Great Vid. I love Dr Strong's no nonsense approach. And like potholer he has a nice sarcastic turn of phrase when dealing with the idiots. Cheers.
Just wanted to reiterate my thanks to you for making this video to raise awareness about climate change, and also to point out how the denier has been impersonating and cyber-bullying me and others on this website in an effort to drive us away from talking about that which we find important.
Thanks for being thoughtful and for caring about the rights of others.
I’ve been told that IPCC is above national FOI Acts. One way to cover yourself and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the process.
we found the [urban warming] effect is pretty big in the areas we analyzed. This is a little different from the result you obtained in 1990. [...] We have published a few of papers on this topic in Chinese. Unfortunately, when we sent our comments to the IPCC AR4, they were mostly rejected.
This will reduce the 1940-1970 cooling in NH temps. Explaining the cooling with sulphates won’t be quite as necessary.
It is interesting to see the lower tropospheric warming minimum in the tropics in all three plots, which I cannot explain. I believe it is spurious but it is remarkably robust against my adjustment efforts.:
Although I agree that GHGs are important in the 19th/20th century (especially since the 1970s), if the weighting of solar forcing was stronger in the models, surely this would diminish the significance of GHGs. [...] it seems to me that by weighting the solar irradiance more strongly in the models, then much of the 19th to mid 20th century warming can be explained from the sun alone.
Any body has a range of temperatures about it's average described by the famous bell curve. Therefore it is possible for a cooler body to contribute to the temperature of the warmer body... At the quantum level. This is also how quantum tunneling works.
Alhough its a shame you don't have the guts to contact Roy Spencer. Or any of the TRUE physicists on this planet who know the difference between 'radiative' and 'convective' transfer.
@TheElasticJesusRez I would try to explain to you what you obviously don't understand, but at this point I see it would be like yelling through a door to a deaf person who is asleep
.
You don't understand physics, you don't want ot understand physics, you only wish to use quotes to support your AGW worship.
If you want quotes! I've been reading the new email releases! Now there are some quotable!
@wstevenschneider This is the science! When you have scientist admitting they are suppressing, altering substituting data. When they are saying their work contradicts the IPCC fraud and the IPCC ignored them. When you have emails where they plainly say they are destroying evidence: THAT IS the science.
@TAMPADOC64 Right, e-mail discussions taken out of context constitute science. Quotes mined and pasted together from said e-mails constitute evidence.
You claim to be a scientist and a skeptic, yet you believe the ClimateGate 2 claims w/o question.
@wstevenschneider Have you read the emails? I'm reading them right now and I would suggest that before you comment any further on matter of which you are ignorant that you too take the time to read them. Unlike the mindless minions that believe AGW cult without question, I do my homework and have studied this topic for over 20 years. I like you was an ignorant believer of this fraud until I started researching this for myself.
Perhaps you someday will awaken from your mindless minion status.
@TAMPADOC64 I refuse to discuss the topic of the e-mails any further. What you're reading are only the cherry-picked portions of back-and-forth discussions between scientists used by the perpetrators of the illegal hacking to promote the idea of an evil agenda.
You failed when you invoked the second law of thermodynamics. You're failing now to produce any real science about the issue of AGW.
@wstevenschneider Unlike you, I've read the emails. Unlike you I understand the science.
Are you questioning Solar forcing relative to entropy? For if you truly understand the Second Law of Thermal Dynamics you would have been smart enough not to bring it up.
Seriously, what is your motivation? My guess is you're nothing more then the one of the AGW worshipers, a useful idiot of your masters.
@TAMPADOC64 I didn't invoke the 2nd Law, to be fair you didn't either when you claimed the universe would incinerate.
Do you deny that the radiant energy from a cool star is incident on a hotter star's surface and this incident energy would be compensated for in the fusion process? Do you deny that stars, unless they violently explode, don't use up their available energy in almost an instant?
Why do you deny the GHG effect? Your verifiable, peer-reviewed evidence?
Why don't you and I go PUBLIC (I have no qualms about revealing my true identity) and let's start a conversation involving TRUE scientists/physicists.
And to make it fair we'll contact a)Richard Lindzen b)Patrick Michaels and c)Roy Spencer - the most visible of climate DENIAL scientists.
And I won't even bother contacting the likes of Susskind, Thorne, & Hawking, because the PhD DENIERS will VERIFY that YOU ARE an IDIOT with no scientific BG at all.
@bernzeppi Don't mention 'Quantum' to these idiots - This is how they 'Jump' to reply - Taumatawhakatangihangakoayauo- tamateaturipukakapikimaungahoro- nukypokaiwhenuakitanatahu Me Tonto Kimosabi Me go and catchee baddy Find him by the shady water Deep within Apache forest Find him scalp him eat him up for breakfast Real good friend to Kimosabi Save another silver bullet Hi ho Silver away Ride into tomorrow today.... But who was that Loony you say That was the Lone Climate Denier
"In an e-mail I just responded to this evening, I once again found myself defending the existence of the Earth’s “greenhouse effect”. I’m talking about the Earth’s natural greenhouse effect, not mankind’s small enhancement of it. And it’s amazing how many scientists, let alone lay people, dispute its existence."
Firstly the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics applies to the behavior of whole systems, not to every part within a system, and to all forms of energy involved in the system…not just its temperature. And in the atmosphere, temperature is only one component to the energy content of an air parcel.
@TheElasticJesusRez Your suggestion that CO2 in the cooler upper atmosphere exerts any thermal forcing effect on the warmer surface below certainly violates the laws of thermal dynamics, both 1st as well as 2nd. Further; your suggestion that the net gain would be greater to a hotter body then a cooler body due to radiative heat transfer is absurd. You get a Bic lighter and I'll get a blow torch and we'll test your theory. You're suggesting the torch will get hotter but not the lighter. Funny!
Then I suggest you take your concerns to Roy Spencer - the person who actually wrote those 12 'kindergarten' points on Thermodynamics (from an article on his site called 'In defense of the Greenhouse Effect'').
DOCTOR Roy Spencer is one of the most highly regarded climatologists in the SKEPTIC CORNER.
So tonight, while you're out drowning your shame in Bud, I suggest you give up the fantasy and stick to cleaning the corridors at USF.
@TAMPADOC64 Wow, you are truly moronic. You just got seriously caught short. Pfffttt! well done. You should be the new pin-up boy of AGW denier stupidity.
The idea that a cooler atmospheric layer can emit infrared energy toward a warmer atmospheric layer below it seems unphysical to many people. I suppose this is because we would not expect a cold piece of metal to transfer heat into a warm piece of metal. But the processes involved in conductive heat transfer are not the same as in radiative heat transfer.
A hot star out in space will still receive, and absorb, radiant energy from a cooler nearby star…even though the NET flow of energy will be in the opposite direction. In other words, a photon being emitted by the cooler star doesn’t stick its finger out to see how warm the surroundings are before it decides to leave. Furthermore, we should not confuse a reduced rate of cooling with heating.
@TheElasticJesusRez "hot star out in space will still receive, and absorb, radiant energy from a cooler nearby star" What? are you a total moron? Either you a) haven't thought this through b) are regurgitating propaganda you don't understand. If this were true, based on the number of stars in the galaxy, and the fact that they would all be absorbing radiation from each other: the entire universe would incinerate.
Since it hasn't we'll assume you're a blathering idiot.
"If this were true, based on the number of stars in the galaxy, and the fact that they would all be absorbing radiation from each other: the entire universe would incinerate."
What the Frak is this gibberish? WOW! You do not understand physical reality in the least!
Imagine you have a jar of boiling hot water right next to a jar of warm water sitting on the counter. The boiling hot jar will cool rapidly, while the warm jar will cool more slowly. Eventually, both jars will achieve the same temperature, just as the 2nd Law predicts.
But what if the boiling hot jar was by all by itself?
Then, it would have cooled even faster. Does that mean that the presence of the warm jar was sending energy into the hot jar? No, it was just reducing the rate of cooling of the hot jar. The climate system is like the hot jar having an internal heating mechanism (the sun warming the surface), but its ability to cool is reduced by its surroundings (the atmosphere), which tends to insulate it.
Another way the objection is voiced is that a layer of the atmosphere that absorbs infrared energy at a certain rate must then also emit it at the same rate, so how can that layer “trap” any energy to warm? This misconception comes from a misunderstanding of Kirchoffs Law, which only says that the infrared opacity of a layer makes that layer’s ability to absorb and emit IR the same.
The actual rate of infrared absorption by a layer depends upon that opacity AND the temperatures of the emitting layers above and below, but the rate of emission depends upon the the same opacity and the temperature of the layer itself. Therefore, the rate of infrared flows in and out of the layer do not have to be equal, and if they are not equal, the layer will either warm or cool radiatively.
Some claim that since the atmosphere is already quite opaque to the transfer of infrared energy, adding a little more CO2 won’t do anything to warm the lower atmosphere and surface. While there is a grain of truth to this, it must be remembered that the Earth’s surface does not radiatively cool directly to outer space, but to the layer of air above it, which in turn cools to the next layer of air above it, etc.
Think of it like several blankets covering your body on a cold night. Your body does not lose energy directly to the cold air outside of the blankets, but to the first blanket, which then transfers heat to the second blanket, etc.
Finally, the most vivid evidence that infrared radiation can cool something below the temperature of its surroundings – in seeming contradiction to the 2nd Law — is what happens on a clear calm night.
The Earth’s surface cools by losing infrared radiation, which then chills the air in contact with it. This nighttime cooling causes a thin layer of cold air to build up near the surface…even though it is colder than the ground below the surface, or the air immediately above it.
There is no way for cooler air aloft coming down to the surface to be causing this effect because when air descends from any altitude, it will always be warmer (not colder) than its surroundings, due to adiabatic compression.
Therefore, we have a cold air layer sandwiched in between two warmer layers, becoming colder still as night progresses.
@TAMPADOC64 Delingpole hasn't got both oars in the water and isn't competent to judge the science or the data. Delingpole gets _all_ his information from...other blogs which he believes w/out question.
4. Brazil. Yes, the dreaded bio fuels that NO intelligent person agrees with.
But how convenient u forgot to mention the timber industry, the mineral industry, the peanut butter washing powder, EVERY FUCKING THING IN YOUR KITCHEN CUPBOARD INDUSTRY,...things I might add, that were decimating forest long before Al Gore came along.
6. CO2 is necessary for life.
DUH!
Tell us something we don't know, you with the argumentative skills of a 5 year old.
And the fact that my pretty straightforward answers have gone straight over your head doesn't surprise me at all given you have the IQ of a slug being digested by a big blue baboon.
As for Brazil, and the Congo, and Indonesia, Malaysia and PNG (that is a country BTW (not the pic extension)) I suggest you learn what would happen to your beloved Tampa if we lose their rainforests.
@Nightversionn that would be the fifth time you have SELF congratulated yourself Clara. If you went to a OWS riot and told the people you want carbon taxes on the people, to be shoveled into the Wall St carbon gangsters pockets so they can build more coastal mansions, dine on more Filet Mignon, and limousine & private jet around the globe, you may get torn to shreds, and thus most of the global warming clowns would be extinguished from you tube. Bye ElasticMassa
@Nightversionn You abuse us constantly for exposing this fraud.
PS, did you read that article I posted about the BEST Project?
It's another ClimateGate! Another AGW purveyor of fraud caught fabricating results. But this time called out by another AGW faithful.
More important: The results from the project show no warming for 13 years AND that the data may have been corrupted by heat islands. That means for your AGW worshipers: It's really been getting colder, not hotter!
@Nightversionn I have ONE account. We all know you have many! You post 100 times more then I do. You post propaganda, call people names, but won't engage in fair debate. You attack people by calling them "sock puppets" and accuse anyone who questions your baseless propaganda of attacking you. You're a coward and a mindless tool of the AGW FRAUD machine, the big government/ big oil crowd.
@TheElasticJesusRez Well let's just look at facts! 2 of the largest oil companies in the world BP and RD Shell, were founding contributors to the CRU, and have contributed all along. So why would 2 companies who have to contract for 95% of their oil off shore in foreign countries (most expensive) want a fake crisis that forces restriction on oil so they make more money for less production and regulations that force their competition out of business???
@TAMPADOC64 You abuse people and cyber-bully people for merely talking about the reality of what's going on with climate change, which if why TheElasticJesusRez made this video, for which I thank him for raising awareness about the problem
@Nightversionn That is hilarious at best but sad that you're so pathetic as to say such sewage. So you're applauding a video that attacks anyone that doesn't agree with your AGW religion. If we disagree with you we should be called names and made fun of and that's OK, but if I debate you it's called cyber-bullying?
From the same shit article in some 2nd rate rag in Orlando - near Tampa I do believe -
"According to The Boston Globe, ExxonMobil in 2002 doled out $100 million to establish a Global Climate and Energy Project at Stanford University tasked with studying climate change."
Yes, and like the GWPF, all done to rubbish AGW.
BTW Patio also tried the RACIST 'My dads bigger than yours' bullshit.
@TheElasticJesusRez I have no clue what you are yammering about. It is however an indisputable fact that BP and RD Shell were founding contributors of the CRU. So if you could explain to me why big oil wanted to start the AGW fraud, I'm very curious to hear you lie, I mean story.
BTW; You set animals on fire as a child, I can tell...
" The Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was established in the School of Environmental Sciences (ENV) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in Norwich in 1972. The contribution of the Founding Director, Professor Hubert H Lamb,..."
Now, would you like an explanation of how British academia is funded?
@TheElasticJesusRez So you're saying that even though the oil companies lied about funding AGW fraud and in fact were in at the very start (which would demonstrate to an intelligent person that they wanted all of this to happen). That the media has hidden this fact from dolts like yourself, that the CRU crowd who is getting paid by them are telling you that they are paying people to oppose them (i.e. they are lying to you), and you're asking what my point is?
@TheElasticJesusRez Bravo! Brilliant come back! I anticipated no less. When you AGW worshipers are confronted with facts your common response is to ignore the facts and perform a personal attack.
Perhaps when you mature we could discuss your religion in detail and why you wish to worship people that wish only for serfdom for you.
But for now, please feel to fornicate removed and expire!
1.Global warming is fake! Proof: Would a fish net keep you warm in a blizzard? That is what you're trying to convince people.
2.The Sun accelerates vaporization of H2O in a warming even such as occurred in the 80s, the Oceans take years to cool and continue to emit water vapor for years
3.CO2 was suppose to increase, there was a major warming even 800 yrs ago
4.CO2 is necessary for life
5.Yes, Brazil deforested millions of acres for green energy! Very smart!
@TAMPADOC64 The reason I post a lot is because you denier sock puppet accounts go around removing my comments. So I make sure to leave quite a few for you. Any more questions?
@TAMPADOC64 Why do I keep thanking ElasticJesus over and over? Because you keep voting down my comments with multiple denier sock puppet accounts, which only gives me the opportunity to thank him over and over for making this video, which I have no problem finding the words to do so.
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to keep thanking him ;;))
@TheElasticJesusRez Thank you for reading his comments, so I don't have to (ha ha), they are like fingernails on the chalkboard.
Going down the race route eh. I guess he (the denier et al) can just keep showing the public what creeps he/they are, and reaffirm what you are saying in this video.
I'm not sure why they show up here to keep acknowledging what your points are in this video, to really continue to show the public what they are about? I suppose ;)
@Nightversionn First of all you MORON, I have ONE account! Second of all you MORON, I have ONE account! Third of all you MORON, I have ONE account! Fourth of all you MORON, I have ONE account! Fifth of all you MORON, I have ONE account! Sixth of all you MORON, I have ONE account! Seventh of all you MORON, I have ONE account! Eigth of all you MORON, I have ONE account! Ninth of all you MORON, I have ONE account! And Tenth of all you MORON, I have ONE account! Do I need to repeat this?
@TheElasticJesusRez Why, it may overtax your mental capacity. You could end up even more unintelligible then you already are (if that's possible).
Perhaps if you were to go self fornicate with extreme intensity until you expire it would help you cause. You know, the let the morons blog movement...
@TAMPADOC64 Yeah right, all your impersonation accounts of my username, thank you for continuing to demonstrate what deniers do and are like, to quell free speech and harass innocent people.
.
Thank you for removing my comments, or trying to cover them with your spam. Because it gives me the chance to offer continuing thanks to TheElasticJesusRez for highlighting your abuse and lies about climate change. If we shine a light on it it will be sure to help others too
@Nightversionn You really need to seek professional help! You are suffering from clinical paranoia and schizophrenia. Are you on medication now? Can I suggest you try antipsychotic medications? Some of these may get rid of the voices in your head. You may also take down the aluminum foil from your walls.
@TAMPADOC64 No, I am telling the truth about what you deniers do to people, you harass them. I don't need help, you do. Youtube won't moderate this website. Everyone knows the internet is full of trolls and cyber-bullies, and deniers are the worst ones as far as I've seen. You've been doing it to me for a long time, and others as well. I'm surprised it's being allowed to continue.
I just appreciate TheElasticJesusRez for making a video about it and trying to help
@Nightversionn You're a paranoid schizophrenic nutbag that thinks 125,000,000 people is all one person out to get you. More then half the country doesn't believe in this fraud. Nutbags like you and the media are the only thing keeping the scoundrels alive. Think about it, how many times do you post a day? I post maybe 15 or 20. I've seen 150 from you in a day before. You're the troll and the cyber bully, not me.
Good reply. 70% of Americans still believe the Earth was created 6000 years ago - the same 70% who then quote billion year geological records to discount AGW.
@TheElasticJesusRez It was a good reply. However yours was more stupidity. BTW, you don't even have to go back through the Geo records to discount AGW. All you need do is understand physics and chemistry. Of course if you actually research what the AGW cult is putting out; i.e. data, papers etc. they've discounted themselves with sloppy fraudulent activity. They can't even keep their lies straight among themselves.
"you don't even have to go back through the Geo records to discount AGW. All you need do is understand physics and chemistry"
Okay, your turn Professor Poindexter. In a few quick sentences please explain how CO2 IS NOT a GHG, how CO2 IS NOT on the increase, and how carbon sinks ARE NOT decreasing.
And given YOUR requirements ABOVE do NOT use these words:
Scam, hoax, conspiracy, Al Gore, Liberal, Democrat, NWO, fraud, or anything that indicates a use of HISTORY.
Did I say CO2 isn't a GHG? No I didn't. But if you had any understanding of the second law of Thermal dynamics and understood entropy along with the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere; you would understand that CO2 isn't in a reasonable quantity to cause any effect as a GHG. As I put in a term that a 5 yr old could understand (which is obviously to high for you) It's like putting a fish net on in a blizzard; it has no effect.
Is this a violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics? No, because the entire depth of the atmosphere – as a system — is indeed losing infrared energy as a whole to the cold depths of outer space.
The same thing happens to the top of your car when the sun sets…it cools by infrared radiation to a temperature cooler than the air, and as a result is often the first place you will see dew form.
After you make PT2 Marty Massa the way I told you to, you can make a parody of you wishing you had a penis with your multitude of phantom penis accounts. Bernzeppi & Co.
@TheElasticJesusRez Mark Gubbish cannot understand you Clara, but then who can, perhaps not even your insane multifaceted self. You invite Mark onto your video, by leaving a link to this video on his comments page and then block him after he continuously punked the crap out of you. Tell your Bernie phantom penis account that Fox News does not hire phantom jizz flingers like herself, especially when they try & fling their phantom jizz at halloween costumed carbon credits & dildos that you wear
You mean your constant childish referrals to dildos and penis'?
I'm sorry, but unlike you, I do not speak the language of Oiluminati, that sacred form of diatribe spoken by the many Corporate-sponsored Shrink-tanks that have been given the duty of rubbishing climate science.
@TheElasticJesusRez No Clara you just speak Randomlaughingman gubbish from WALLSTluminati.
You invite Mark Gubbish onto your clown video and than ban him for exposing you. You have never been a "straight shooter" but always wished you could be a poop shooter if you had a real penis. The dildo does not make it right for you. LOL
@TheElasticJesusRez Oiluminati? And you talk about diatribe in the same sentence? I salute your balls. And your hypocrisy. Cute new term by the way. Ohnoes Teh Oiluminati Is Here To Mayk Plastic And Petural! I Mene Dey Is To Kill Uz! After all what have those oil companies ever done for us? Look around the room you're sitting in, do you see anything made from oil based products or which wouldn't be there but for cheap transport provided by petrol and diesel? We don't need the Oiluminati!
BTW I enjoyed what Clara had to say about you AND I quote:
"you're a Montauk Project -programmed scumbag, used to harass proper real-humans like me, that's all you are - evil scum that exist just to fuck-up nature and gaians, to keep this reality a frequency-controlled hellworld.
kill yourself scumfuck"
Sort of sums you up in a nutshell doesn't it, sweetie pie. XXX
@TheElasticJesusRez You've just painted Clara Luisa Massa as the model of rationality. I rest my case. Assuming this is not one of Clara's myriad sock puppet accounts of course, which it probably is.
@TheElasticJesusRez Alright, now you just sound like a freakin' troll. If not then try to understand that finding yourself on the same side as Charles Manson or, even worse, Clara Massa, is nothing to be proud of.
Thanks again to the maker of this video for highlighting the problem with these trolls online, and how they lie about climate change. And also how they harass and impersonate me and others in an effort to drive anyone away from talking about this issue.
@patioperson Which only goes to prove deniers have no science, no rationality, no morality (see this video about their misinformation and impersonation and abuse of people who talk about climate change.
The planet is still warming and energy policy needs to be addressed, duh?
Here goes Nighty on her impersonating rampage again.
Nighty, I have no problem with you cloning Nightversion, I had so much trouble finding a handle, most were rejected as already taken, must be millions registered with Youtube. I was sitting on the patio one day and that's when I tried Patioperson and it wasn't taken, surprise.
What I do have a problem with is the fact that you impersonated another and then squawk when the same happens to you.
@ClaraPhantompenis Hilarious that you continue to self congratulate yourself on this video. Did you ever figure out where that phantom jizz you flung ended up?
This has been flagged as spam show
Open letter to anyone new to all this.
If you want to know what this video is about, please look at the Encyclopedia Dramatica entry for Randomlaughingman aka Clara Massa. For Example “So the denier flies come a-swarming
Still dribberling the same old shit
Thermometers show the earth is warming
it's a fact their "facts" dudn't fit”
bernzeppi Aka Clara the rhymer
Not exactly intelligent discussion about climate change.
LordMonckton78 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Get some thermodynamics into ya:
en . wikipedia . org/wiki/Latent_heat
Do the calculations yourself:
kentchemistry . com/links/Energy/HeatVaporizat ion . htm
Y'see pilgrims, nature offers no free rides.
As the temperature of the earth increases more water evaporates... this translates into more rain, hail, snow... more floods.
You who pay attention know that hail happens on a hot humid day!
Now, can anyone explain why?
bernzeppi 3 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
After initializing and parametrizing hundreds of unknown factors, inserting divergent proxy data and ignoring any difficult natural forcing factors,we ran hundreds of simulations until we obtained the results we wanted–an ensemble of meaningless projected results,which we then averaged. We utilized the liberally unprincipled component method to homogenize and sensitize this to produce a new hockey stick,which gave a very robust prediction (95% probability) that we are all being totally screwed.
1000frolly 3 weeks ago
@1000frolly
You don't need a hockey stick to prove that a billion vehicles emit more CO2 than 1; that a million factories emit more CO2 than 1; that less trees recycle less CO2 than more; and that if this trend continues we will be in deep, deep, shit.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 weeks ago
@TheElasticJesusRez
There is no problem with CO2 right now and we should do nothing until it reaches 1,000ppm or so and then look at it again.
1000frolly 3 weeks ago
@1000frolly
Says who? State your sources.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 weeks ago
@TheElasticJesusRez
I have looked closely into this question; and I think this is what we should do.
1000frolly 3 weeks ago
@TheElasticJesusRez
You sound worried; in this case you'd better talk to the Chinese, who are the world's biggest emitters and by 2050 will be responsible for the majority of man-made CO2 in the atmosphere. Good luck with that.
1000frolly 3 weeks ago
@1000frolly
Your implication is that I'm a novice who has just jumped onto the green bandwagon. I'm well aware of the Chinese situation as I am every other nation on this planet. And No, talking to the Chinese unilaterally is not the answer: this is a worldwide problem.
As for worries. I know the science, 'understand' the science. And like every other person who understands, there are good reasons to be worried.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 weeks ago
@TheElasticJesusRez
I understand the science, and I am not worried.
However, for those who still want to press ahead with useless and horribly expensive CO2 cuts, you are only playing at it unless you get China (and India) to CUT their emisssions.
This is not going to happen.
1000frolly 3 weeks ago
@1000frolly
No. You're not worried because you DON'T understand the science.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 weeks ago
@TheElasticJesusRez
I understand the science fully; I have examined both sides.
Unfortunately, one side (yours) is not just about the science. This has lead to many of the old climate scientists and all of the 'new' climate scientists who came into the field recently (once the money was there) cooking the data, trying to validate models, faking graphs to support their hypothesis, trying to discredit any opposing views ect ect.
1000frolly 3 weeks ago
@1000frolly
STATE SOURCES!!!
Richard Muller - long time darling of the deniers - has in the past year revealed that his 'BEST' research does conclude the Earth is warming.
John Christy - friend & colleague of Roy Spencer - has now admitted the Earth is warming etc.
There is NO cooked data in a world where humans add an extra 73 million tonnes CO2 per day to the atmosphere.
Continually fill your room with cigarette smoke and guess what...???
Strewth!!!
TheElasticJesusRez 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheElasticJesusRez
Everyone knows it has warmed in the last 150 years-so what?
The point is that is there is no evidence for catastrophic climate change, caused by humans.
This red herring that is contimually thrown up about warmest on 'record' I mean, so what? That is not causality. We are talking about science now, not imagination or models.
The human temperature record is too short to assess climate changes. The small temperature change we have had are not unusual
1000frolly 2 weeks ago
@TheElasticJesusRez
Polls show that only 10.8% of the AGW climate scientists describe themslves as "not being an environmental activist".
This means that their 'science' is naturtally coloured by their environmental views, and so cannot be trusted-as we have seen from climategate
All the climate change science produced for the IPCC therefore needs to be checked several times by competent and impartial scientists to ensure it has been done according to the scientific method.
1000frolly 3 weeks ago
@1000frolly
What POLLS? I repeat - State sources.
As for "Climategate" - a term coined by the disingenuous NON SCIENTIFIC Telegraph hack James Delingpole when deliberately inventing an enemy to counter his very self-centred RIGHT WING view of the universe - we discover how the aforementioned used lots of spin on certain words to make it look like something untoward was happening.
Of course it wasn't & the people involved have since been vindicated.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 weeks ago
Thanks again ElasticJesusRez for making this video to raise awareness about climate change and for also showing how deniers and their sock accounts abuse people (such as myself) and others.
I appreciate the work you did on this issue ;)
Nightversionn 1 month ago
@Nightversionn
You're very welcome.
TheElasticJesusRez 1 month ago
The climate models are not actually models you know they are spherical crystal devices that when the climatologists hands are laid on them a swirling mist reveals what will be happening in the future
LordMonckton78 1 month ago
@LordMonckton78
Pretty much like the right-wing economic model you base your science(?) on then, eh?
TheElasticJesusRez 1 month ago
@TheElasticJesusRez No Clara, the Climate modelers are not really scientists, they are prophets spouting gloom & doom prophecies for their Wall St carbon mafia Global Warm-mongers. Get some rest Pam.
LordMonckton78 1 month ago
Continued thanks for making this video and raising awareness about climate change and about the astroturf mob the deniers create online (regarding youtube, it's mostly one denier with countless denier sock puppet accounts).
Thanks very much for helping and a Happy New Year to you as well. ;)
Nightversionn 1 month ago
Wayhaaaay!
I've been blocked by another Idiot. This time Peekay22 with his IDIOTS GUIDE TO GLOBAL WARMING. Ha! Never a truer word spoken.
But anyway to the point. GOOGLE. if this Right-wing banner boy for NON FREE SPEECH is allowed to BLOCK ME, then why the FUCK should I have to give him a plug --------------->
Get this grotesque IDIOT off my page and put him on the AlexJones/Koch/NWO Aliens have landed on Sydney Harbour Bridge page.
TheElasticJesusRez 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Continued thanks for making this video, in order to raise awareness about climate change, man-made, and for the abuse the vested interests do to people who want to speak out about it.
Nightversionn 2 months ago
@Robtheleathermen
Yep! Great Vid. I love Dr Strong's no nonsense approach. And like potholer he has a nice sarcastic turn of phrase when dealing with the idiots. Cheers.
TheElasticJesusRez 2 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez Sorry Clara, Rob had to close that account, something to do with threatening & harassing carbon tax resistors. Get some rest Pam.
LordMonckton78 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Just wanted to reiterate my thanks to you for making this video to raise awareness about climate change, and also to point out how the denier has been impersonating and cyber-bullying me and others on this website in an effort to drive us away from talking about that which we find important.
Thanks for being thoughtful and for caring about the rights of others.
Continued appreciation ;)
Nightversionn 2 months ago
sorry guys who made this vid.
youtube- Climategate 2.0 "The Cause" movie trailer
now this is great and epic.
laurelbush 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ClimateGate IIQuotables:
I’ve been told that IPCC is above national FOI Acts. One way to cover yourself and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the process.
TAMPADOC64 2 months ago
ClimateGate II quoteables:
we found the [urban warming] effect is pretty big in the areas we analyzed. This is a little different from the result you obtained in 1990. [...] We have published a few of papers on this topic in Chinese. Unfortunately, when we sent our comments to the IPCC AR4, they were mostly rejected.
TAMPADOC64 2 months ago
ClimateGate II quotables:
This will reduce the 1940-1970 cooling in NH temps. Explaining the cooling with sulphates won’t be quite as necessary.
It is interesting to see the lower tropospheric warming minimum in the tropics in all three plots, which I cannot explain. I believe it is spurious but it is remarkably robust against my adjustment efforts.:
TAMPADOC64 2 months ago
ClimateGate II quotables:
Although I agree that GHGs are important in the 19th/20th century (especially since the 1970s), if the weighting of solar forcing was stronger in the models, surely this would diminish the significance of GHGs. [...] it seems to me that by weighting the solar irradiance more strongly in the models, then much of the 19th to mid 20th century warming can be explained from the sun alone.
TAMPADOC64 2 months ago
Comment removed
Nightversionn 2 months ago
@Nightversionn nobody like a whiner ,
please Miss they are getting at me,
laurelbush 2 months ago
@laurelbush
'please Miss they are getting at me'
Thought so. 5 year old.
TheElasticJesusRez 2 months ago
Any body has a range of temperatures about it's average described by the famous bell curve. Therefore it is possible for a cooler body to contribute to the temperature of the warmer body... At the quantum level. This is also how quantum tunneling works.
bernzeppi 3 months ago
@bernzeppi yes i stood by a log fire and made it warmer.
laurelbush 3 months ago
@laurelbush Weoll then, you must be responsible for AGW!
Doesn't this mean that the Earth is heating the Sun?
TAMPADOC64 2 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
Mock all you like.
Alhough its a shame you don't have the guts to contact Roy Spencer. Or any of the TRUE physicists on this planet who know the difference between 'radiative' and 'convective' transfer.
TheElasticJesusRez 2 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez I would try to explain to you what you obviously don't understand, but at this point I see it would be like yelling through a door to a deaf person who is asleep
.
You don't understand physics, you don't want ot understand physics, you only wish to use quotes to support your AGW worship.
If you want quotes! I've been reading the new email releases! Now there are some quotable!
Boy have your gods stepped in it again!
Some day mindless minions like you will awaken.
TAMPADOC64 2 months ago
@TAMPADOC64 Please stick to the science and not cherry-picked e-mails used out of context.
wstevenschneider 2 months ago
@wstevenschneider This is the science! When you have scientist admitting they are suppressing, altering substituting data. When they are saying their work contradicts the IPCC fraud and the IPCC ignored them. When you have emails where they plainly say they are destroying evidence: THAT IS the science.
Please stop ignoring reality!
TAMPADOC64 2 months ago
@TAMPADOC64 Right, e-mail discussions taken out of context constitute science. Quotes mined and pasted together from said e-mails constitute evidence.
You claim to be a scientist and a skeptic, yet you believe the ClimateGate 2 claims w/o question.
wstevenschneider 2 months ago
@wstevenschneider Have you read the emails? I'm reading them right now and I would suggest that before you comment any further on matter of which you are ignorant that you too take the time to read them. Unlike the mindless minions that believe AGW cult without question, I do my homework and have studied this topic for over 20 years. I like you was an ignorant believer of this fraud until I started researching this for myself.
Perhaps you someday will awaken from your mindless minion status.
TAMPADOC64 2 months ago
@TAMPADOC64 I refuse to discuss the topic of the e-mails any further. What you're reading are only the cherry-picked portions of back-and-forth discussions between scientists used by the perpetrators of the illegal hacking to promote the idea of an evil agenda.
You failed when you invoked the second law of thermodynamics. You're failing now to produce any real science about the issue of AGW.
Srsly, who are you and what's your motivation?
wstevenschneider 2 months ago
@wstevenschneider Unlike you, I've read the emails. Unlike you I understand the science.
Are you questioning Solar forcing relative to entropy? For if you truly understand the Second Law of Thermal Dynamics you would have been smart enough not to bring it up.
Seriously, what is your motivation? My guess is you're nothing more then the one of the AGW worshipers, a useful idiot of your masters.
TAMPADOC64 2 months ago
@TAMPADOC64 I didn't invoke the 2nd Law, to be fair you didn't either when you claimed the universe would incinerate.
Do you deny that the radiant energy from a cool star is incident on a hotter star's surface and this incident energy would be compensated for in the fusion process? Do you deny that stars, unless they violently explode, don't use up their available energy in almost an instant?
Why do you deny the GHG effect? Your verifiable, peer-reviewed evidence?
wstevenschneider 2 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
Tell you what big guy...
Why don't you and I go PUBLIC (I have no qualms about revealing my true identity) and let's start a conversation involving TRUE scientists/physicists.
And to make it fair we'll contact a)Richard Lindzen b)Patrick Michaels and c)Roy Spencer - the most visible of climate DENIAL scientists.
And I won't even bother contacting the likes of Susskind, Thorne, & Hawking, because the PhD DENIERS will VERIFY that YOU ARE an IDIOT with no scientific BG at all.
TheElasticJesusRez 2 months ago 4
@bernzeppi Clara, any more new poems we can laugh at? Surf's up 'dude' (Clara). lol
LordMonckton78 2 months ago in playlist More videos from TheElasticJesusRez
TheElasticJesusRez 2 months ago
@bernzeppi
BTW The message was punctuated to make it readable.
Blame the YT programmers. Again.
TheElasticJesusRez 2 months ago
TAMPON, I award you the thickest of all thick deniers.
You make praiLE, NightLonn, and Patio look like Paul Dirac.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago 2
@TAMPADOC64
Do you do this on a purpose or are u genuinely the dumbest mother on Earth?
drroyspencer(.)com/2009/04/in-defense-of-the-greenhouse-effect/
"In an e-mail I just responded to this evening, I once again found myself defending the existence of the Earth’s “greenhouse effect”. I’m talking about the Earth’s natural greenhouse effect, not mankind’s small enhancement of it. And it’s amazing how many scientists, let alone lay people, dispute its existence."
Dr Roy Spencer
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
Clara are you here? LOL
MarkGubbish 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
Here are the facts and defy them at your peril.
I can't wait for the response.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
1.
Firstly the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics applies to the behavior of whole systems, not to every part within a system, and to all forms of energy involved in the system…not just its temperature. And in the atmosphere, temperature is only one component to the energy content of an air parcel.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez Your suggestion that CO2 in the cooler upper atmosphere exerts any thermal forcing effect on the warmer surface below certainly violates the laws of thermal dynamics, both 1st as well as 2nd. Further; your suggestion that the net gain would be greater to a hotter body then a cooler body due to radiative heat transfer is absurd. You get a Bic lighter and I'll get a blow torch and we'll test your theory. You're suggesting the torch will get hotter but not the lighter. Funny!
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
Funny?
And I suppose you get all your scientific knowledge from that idiot at UAH (Alabama Huntsville) - king Denier himself - ROY SPENCER?
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez You are funny~ So I'm guessing you're not going to be holding a Bic?
Post Script; No, I've never met Prof. Roy Spencer, I get my knowledge from the Universities I attended and I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express.
I'll address the stupidity in water jar nonsense later. For now I have more important things to do then correct kindergarten papers.
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
Kindergarten papers eh?
Then I suggest you take your concerns to Roy Spencer - the person who actually wrote those 12 'kindergarten' points on Thermodynamics (from an article on his site called 'In defense of the Greenhouse Effect'').
DOCTOR Roy Spencer is one of the most highly regarded climatologists in the SKEPTIC CORNER.
So tonight, while you're out drowning your shame in Bud, I suggest you give up the fantasy and stick to cleaning the corridors at USF.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez You obviously didn't read his book. Could you have screwed these up any more? I don't think so!
Try quoting the actual source next time nitwit!
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64 Wow, you are truly moronic. You just got seriously caught short. Pfffttt! well done. You should be the new pin-up boy of AGW denier stupidity.
uknowispeaksense 3 months ago
2.
The idea that a cooler atmospheric layer can emit infrared energy toward a warmer atmospheric layer below it seems unphysical to many people. I suppose this is because we would not expect a cold piece of metal to transfer heat into a warm piece of metal. But the processes involved in conductive heat transfer are not the same as in radiative heat transfer.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
3.
A hot star out in space will still receive, and absorb, radiant energy from a cooler nearby star…even though the NET flow of energy will be in the opposite direction. In other words, a photon being emitted by the cooler star doesn’t stick its finger out to see how warm the surroundings are before it decides to leave. Furthermore, we should not confuse a reduced rate of cooling with heating.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez "hot star out in space will still receive, and absorb, radiant energy from a cooler nearby star" What? are you a total moron? Either you a) haven't thought this through b) are regurgitating propaganda you don't understand. If this were true, based on the number of stars in the galaxy, and the fact that they would all be absorbing radiation from each other: the entire universe would incinerate.
Since it hasn't we'll assume you're a blathering idiot.
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
"If this were true, based on the number of stars in the galaxy, and the fact that they would all be absorbing radiation from each other: the entire universe would incinerate."
What the Frak is this gibberish? WOW! You do not understand physical reality in the least!
Knossos22 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64 Holy jump'n Jebus, yuz gotz pwn3d! Did you miss the word "NET"?
LOL!
wstevenschneider 3 months ago
@wstevenschneider I'm in AGW worshiper wacko Central!
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
"I'm in AGW worshiper wacko Central!"
No. You're In sane."
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
"the entire universe would incinerate"
What crap! ha ha ha ha ha... I'm still laughing!!!!!
Knossos22 3 months ago
4.
Imagine you have a jar of boiling hot water right next to a jar of warm water sitting on the counter. The boiling hot jar will cool rapidly, while the warm jar will cool more slowly. Eventually, both jars will achieve the same temperature, just as the 2nd Law predicts.
But what if the boiling hot jar was by all by itself?
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
5.
Then, it would have cooled even faster. Does that mean that the presence of the warm jar was sending energy into the hot jar? No, it was just reducing the rate of cooling of the hot jar. The climate system is like the hot jar having an internal heating mechanism (the sun warming the surface), but its ability to cool is reduced by its surroundings (the atmosphere), which tends to insulate it.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
6.
Another way the objection is voiced is that a layer of the atmosphere that absorbs infrared energy at a certain rate must then also emit it at the same rate, so how can that layer “trap” any energy to warm? This misconception comes from a misunderstanding of Kirchoffs Law, which only says that the infrared opacity of a layer makes that layer’s ability to absorb and emit IR the same.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
7.
The actual rate of infrared absorption by a layer depends upon that opacity AND the temperatures of the emitting layers above and below, but the rate of emission depends upon the the same opacity and the temperature of the layer itself. Therefore, the rate of infrared flows in and out of the layer do not have to be equal, and if they are not equal, the layer will either warm or cool radiatively.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
8.
Some claim that since the atmosphere is already quite opaque to the transfer of infrared energy, adding a little more CO2 won’t do anything to warm the lower atmosphere and surface. While there is a grain of truth to this, it must be remembered that the Earth’s surface does not radiatively cool directly to outer space, but to the layer of air above it, which in turn cools to the next layer of air above it, etc.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
9.
Think of it like several blankets covering your body on a cold night. Your body does not lose energy directly to the cold air outside of the blankets, but to the first blanket, which then transfers heat to the second blanket, etc.
Finally, the most vivid evidence that infrared radiation can cool something below the temperature of its surroundings – in seeming contradiction to the 2nd Law — is what happens on a clear calm night.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
10.
The Earth’s surface cools by losing infrared radiation, which then chills the air in contact with it. This nighttime cooling causes a thin layer of cold air to build up near the surface…even though it is colder than the ground below the surface, or the air immediately above it.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
11.
There is no way for cooler air aloft coming down to the surface to be causing this effect because when air descends from any altitude, it will always be warmer (not colder) than its surroundings, due to adiabatic compression.
Therefore, we have a cold air layer sandwiched in between two warmer layers, becoming colder still as night progresses.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• Climate news (for those interested)...
.
Prof Richard Muller was caught publishing fraudulent conclusions and data from the BEST project.
Best data showed no warming since the mid 90s as well as added validity to heat islands corrupting data which prove cooling over the last 15 years.
.
Prof. Curry of BEST said "climate scientists who had previously rejected sceptics’ arguments were now taking them much more seriously"
.
Mail Online, UK 30 October 2011
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
"Prof Richard Muller was caught publishing fraudulent conclusions and data from the BEST project"
Funny eh! 3 weeks ago he was the messiah of the Mingmong deniers, and now he's hated.
You 2-faced set of *******************.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64 Delingpole hasn't got both oars in the water and isn't competent to judge the science or the data. Delingpole gets _all_ his information from...other blogs which he believes w/out question.
wstevenschneider 3 months ago
4. Brazil. Yes, the dreaded bio fuels that NO intelligent person agrees with.
But how convenient u forgot to mention the timber industry, the mineral industry, the peanut butter washing powder, EVERY FUCKING THING IN YOUR KITCHEN CUPBOARD INDUSTRY,...things I might add, that were decimating forest long before Al Gore came along.
6. CO2 is necessary for life.
DUH!
Tell us something we don't know, you with the argumentative skills of a 5 year old.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
1. Would a roof insulate you in a blizzard? Well done Mr Physicist, you've just killed the multi-trillion dollar INSULATION industry.
2. 1 car emits 1 cars worth of CO2. 1 billion cars emit...?
Your turn.
3. 1 tree soaks up 1 trees worth of CO2 (thats if u believe photosynthesis isn't a Marxist fraud). 1 trillion trees soak up...?
Your turn.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez
1. Would a roof insulate you in a blizzard? Are you suggesting a roof made of chicken wire would?
2. 1 car emits 1 cars worth of CO2. WOW, I'll bet you were up all night thinking up that one! but nonsensical!
3. 1 tree soaks up 1 trees worth of CO2. up 2 nights I see
4. Brazil, maybe you better argue this point with your other AGW wackos that are always touting how wonderful Brazil is.
You missed 5 (see, you can't count)
Since you answered none of my points, you lose!
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
refer back to reply entitled FACTS.
And the fact that my pretty straightforward answers have gone straight over your head doesn't surprise me at all given you have the IQ of a slug being digested by a big blue baboon.
As for Brazil, and the Congo, and Indonesia, Malaysia and PNG (that is a country BTW (not the pic extension)) I suggest you learn what would happen to your beloved Tampa if we lose their rainforests.
Get some rest Pam.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
As I was saying, many thanks to TheElasticJesusRez for making this video about the deniers and their abuse of me and others.
Also for raising awareness about climate change.
Much appreciated.
(ignore the haters)
Nightversionn 3 months ago
Many thanks again to ElasticJesusRez for making this video about climate change and the abuse denier(s) do to people (like me) for speaking out.
Continued and repeated thanks ;)
Nightversionn 3 months ago
@Nightversionn that would be the fifth time you have SELF congratulated yourself Clara. If you went to a OWS riot and told the people you want carbon taxes on the people, to be shoveled into the Wall St carbon gangsters pockets so they can build more coastal mansions, dine on more Filet Mignon, and limousine & private jet around the globe, you may get torn to shreds, and thus most of the global warming clowns would be extinguished from you tube. Bye ElasticMassa
LordMonckton78 3 months ago
@Nightversionn You abuse us constantly for exposing this fraud.
PS, did you read that article I posted about the BEST Project?
It's another ClimateGate! Another AGW purveyor of fraud caught fabricating results. But this time called out by another AGW faithful.
More important: The results from the project show no warming for 13 years AND that the data may have been corrupted by heat islands. That means for your AGW worshipers: It's really been getting colder, not hotter!
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64 Oh really, "Niightversionn," "Nighttversionn" etc...really, YOU are the abuser, you and all your denier sock puppet accounts.
See above video someone made about your abuse (to whom I give many thanks)
Nightversionn 3 months ago
@Nightversionn I have ONE account. We all know you have many! You post 100 times more then I do. You post propaganda, call people names, but won't engage in fair debate. You attack people by calling them "sock puppets" and accuse anyone who questions your baseless propaganda of attacking you. You're a coward and a mindless tool of the AGW FRAUD machine, the big government/ big oil crowd.
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
?
Hmm! So the oil industry is IN on the moves to clean up the oil industry?
Is Tampa short for TAMPON?
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez Well let's just look at facts! 2 of the largest oil companies in the world BP and RD Shell, were founding contributors to the CRU, and have contributed all along. So why would 2 companies who have to contract for 95% of their oil off shore in foreign countries (most expensive) want a fake crisis that forces restriction on oil so they make more money for less production and regulations that force their competition out of business???
Boy, that's a tough one to figure out!
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64 You abuse people and cyber-bully people for merely talking about the reality of what's going on with climate change, which if why TheElasticJesusRez made this video, for which I thank him for raising awareness about the problem
Nightversionn 3 months ago
@Nightversionn That is hilarious at best but sad that you're so pathetic as to say such sewage. So you're applauding a video that attacks anyone that doesn't agree with your AGW religion. If we disagree with you we should be called names and made fun of and that's OK, but if I debate you it's called cyber-bullying?
You are truly a sick, disturbed individual
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
From the same shit article in some 2nd rate rag in Orlando - near Tampa I do believe -
"According to The Boston Globe, ExxonMobil in 2002 doled out $100 million to establish a Global Climate and Energy Project at Stanford University tasked with studying climate change."
Yes, and like the GWPF, all done to rubbish AGW.
BTW Patio also tried the RACIST 'My dads bigger than yours' bullshit.
It doesn't wash.
Russia won WW2. Get over it.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez I have no clue what you are yammering about. It is however an indisputable fact that BP and RD Shell were founding contributors of the CRU. So if you could explain to me why big oil wanted to start the AGW fraud, I'm very curious to hear you lie, I mean story.
BTW; You set animals on fire as a child, I can tell...
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
Guess what this is the opening line of...
" The Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was established in the School of Environmental Sciences (ENV) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) in Norwich in 1972. The contribution of the Founding Director, Professor Hubert H Lamb,..."
Now, would you like an explanation of how British academia is funded?
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez Can you explain it to me? This is their web site, right?
htt p://ww w. cru. uea. ac. uk/cru/about/history/
And it's their history page, right?
And the acknowledgements at the bottom are their main contributors, right?
And it's their history, right?
And your explanation is what?
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
And your point is what?
That all Americans are Nazis simply b/c they wouldn't have developed IRBM technology without the assistance of Von Braun.
Hmmm! I think you need a lesson in how to argue intelligently without resorting to fallacy.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez So you're saying that even though the oil companies lied about funding AGW fraud and in fact were in at the very start (which would demonstrate to an intelligent person that they wanted all of this to happen). That the media has hidden this fact from dolts like yourself, that the CRU crowd who is getting paid by them are telling you that they are paying people to oppose them (i.e. they are lying to you), and you're asking what my point is?
You need a lesson in reality!
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
You need a brain.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez Bravo! Brilliant come back! I anticipated no less. When you AGW worshipers are confronted with facts your common response is to ignore the facts and perform a personal attack.
Perhaps when you mature we could discuss your religion in detail and why you wish to worship people that wish only for serfdom for you.
But for now, please feel to fornicate removed and expire!
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
FACTS.
1 Global warming is REAL. Proof: No atmosphere, no blanket, NO IDIOT TAMPON.
2. CO2 is a GHG which helps accelerate the effect of water vapour - another GHG.
3. CO2 is on the increase.
4. Anthropogenic induced CO2 is NEW CO2. IOW adding to the CO2 already in circulation.
5 Sinks are DECREASING. 11 million hectares deforestation per year. Oceans becoming more ACIDIC.
So IDIOT please explain how, when you've thrown away the antivenin, you'll survive the poison?
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez
Facts:
1.Global warming is fake! Proof: Would a fish net keep you warm in a blizzard? That is what you're trying to convince people.
2.The Sun accelerates vaporization of H2O in a warming even such as occurred in the 80s, the Oceans take years to cool and continue to emit water vapor for years
3.CO2 was suppose to increase, there was a major warming even 800 yrs ago
4.CO2 is necessary for life
5.Yes, Brazil deforested millions of acres for green energy! Very smart!
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez Oh and as to your question;
No, it's short for Tampa, as in Tampa, Florida. Sorry, I didn't realize some people wouldn't have the brain capacity to figure that one out?
WHile we're on the subject; what is TheElasticJesusRez short for/ Mindless, brain dead, tool, douchebag AGW worshiper?
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
"No, it's short for Tampa, as in Tampa, Florida. Sorry, I didn't realize some people wouldn't have the brain capacity to figure that one out?"
Yet I'm NOT sorry that the other 6.9999999999999999999999 billion people who don't live in Tampa don't give a flying fuck.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64 The reason I post a lot is because you denier sock puppet accounts go around removing my comments. So I make sure to leave quite a few for you. Any more questions?
Nightversionn 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64 Why do I keep thanking ElasticJesus over and over? Because you keep voting down my comments with multiple denier sock puppet accounts, which only gives me the opportunity to thank him over and over for making this video, which I have no problem finding the words to do so.
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to keep thanking him ;;))
Nightversionn 3 months ago
@Nightversionn
Tampa Bay Cloudy is an idiot.
Note he's now going down the RACE route - just like PATIO a few replies back.
You know that when it gets personal (slagging off other countries) they've REALLY LOST the argument.
Keep up the good work.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez Race? You're a retard! I never mentioned race idiot, you did!
Of course you're also the one who had to resort to childish profanity.
I guess you lose over and over!
Keep up the good work, tool!
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
Get some rest (s)Pam.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez Thank you for reading his comments, so I don't have to (ha ha), they are like fingernails on the chalkboard.
Going down the race route eh. I guess he (the denier et al) can just keep showing the public what creeps he/they are, and reaffirm what you are saying in this video.
I'm not sure why they show up here to keep acknowledging what your points are in this video, to really continue to show the public what they are about? I suppose ;)
Nightversionn 3 months ago
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
"Do I need to repeat this? "
I wish you would. I need to know if you can count past 11.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez Why, it may overtax your mental capacity. You could end up even more unintelligible then you already are (if that's possible).
Perhaps if you were to go self fornicate with extreme intensity until you expire it would help you cause. You know, the let the morons blog movement...
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64 Yeah right, all your impersonation accounts of my username, thank you for continuing to demonstrate what deniers do and are like, to quell free speech and harass innocent people.
.
Thank you for removing my comments, or trying to cover them with your spam. Because it gives me the chance to offer continuing thanks to TheElasticJesusRez for highlighting your abuse and lies about climate change. If we shine a light on it it will be sure to help others too
Nightversionn 3 months ago
@Nightversionn You really need to seek professional help! You are suffering from clinical paranoia and schizophrenia. Are you on medication now? Can I suggest you try antipsychotic medications? Some of these may get rid of the voices in your head. You may also take down the aluminum foil from your walls.
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64 No, I am telling the truth about what you deniers do to people, you harass them. I don't need help, you do. Youtube won't moderate this website. Everyone knows the internet is full of trolls and cyber-bullies, and deniers are the worst ones as far as I've seen. You've been doing it to me for a long time, and others as well. I'm surprised it's being allowed to continue.
I just appreciate TheElasticJesusRez for making a video about it and trying to help
Nightversionn 3 months ago
@Nightversionn You're a paranoid schizophrenic nutbag that thinks 125,000,000 people is all one person out to get you. More then half the country doesn't believe in this fraud. Nutbags like you and the media are the only thing keeping the scoundrels alive. Think about it, how many times do you post a day? I post maybe 15 or 20. I've seen 150 from you in a day before. You're the troll and the cyber bully, not me.
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
Good reply. 70% of Americans still believe the Earth was created 6000 years ago - the same 70% who then quote billion year geological records to discount AGW.
?
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez It was a good reply. However yours was more stupidity. BTW, you don't even have to go back through the Geo records to discount AGW. All you need do is understand physics and chemistry. Of course if you actually research what the AGW cult is putting out; i.e. data, papers etc. they've discounted themselves with sloppy fraudulent activity. They can't even keep their lies straight among themselves.
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
"you don't even have to go back through the Geo records to discount AGW. All you need do is understand physics and chemistry"
Okay, your turn Professor Poindexter. In a few quick sentences please explain how CO2 IS NOT a GHG, how CO2 IS NOT on the increase, and how carbon sinks ARE NOT decreasing.
And given YOUR requirements ABOVE do NOT use these words:
Scam, hoax, conspiracy, Al Gore, Liberal, Democrat, NWO, fraud, or anything that indicates a use of HISTORY.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez You have the intellect of a turnip.
Did I say CO2 isn't a GHG? No I didn't. But if you had any understanding of the second law of Thermal dynamics and understood entropy along with the percentage of CO2 in the atmosphere; you would understand that CO2 isn't in a reasonable quantity to cause any effect as a GHG. As I put in a term that a 5 yr old could understand (which is obviously to high for you) It's like putting a fish net on in a blizzard; it has no effect.
TAMPADOC64 3 months ago
@TAMPADOC64
12.
Is this a violation of the Second Law of Thermodynamics? No, because the entire depth of the atmosphere – as a system — is indeed losing infrared energy as a whole to the cold depths of outer space.
The same thing happens to the top of your car when the sun sets…it cools by infrared radiation to a temperature cooler than the air, and as a result is often the first place you will see dew form.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
why am i and my flame thrower not on the opening.
laurelbush 3 months ago
@laurelbush
Begging your pardon but you were foremost in my mind and therefore promoted to act 1.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez thank you!
laurelbush 3 months ago
@laurelbush
The pleasure was all mine.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
After you make PT2 Marty Massa the way I told you to, you can make a parody of you wishing you had a penis with your multitude of phantom penis accounts. Bernzeppi & Co.
LordMonckton78 3 months ago
@LordMonckton78
Sorry part 2 is already made, and you take the leading roll Le Frogged.
watch?v=dtzF2xnlvfY
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
Sorry Jesus. If you want to gain the confidence of the science community you won't find it posting on this ridiculous cartoon channel.
patioperson 3 months ago
Jesus, if you ever get off your ass and wander out into reality land, I'd advise you wear your parka.
patioperson 3 months ago
Colloquial form is fine.
It's in use all over the world.
Get off the computer and try to row a boat to the north pole.
According to alarmists, it's open water up there.
Now there's NIghtly lying about climate change again (and again and again).
Whatever Nightly is complaining about is what she's up to.
She harasses me daily and impersonates Nightversion with every post.
And the earth is still cooling. Don't know about the climate, but this orb is heading for another ice age. Fast.
patioperson 3 months ago
@patioperson
Okay, so now you know everything about the Arctic just b/c you live in the vicinity.
PATHETIC!
FTR I probably live further north than you do, so - by your warped logic - that must make me the world's greatest expert on the Arctic.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
Another round of Clara Massa self congratulating herself, makes it the 4th time now. What a kook
LordMonckton78 3 months ago
@LordMonckton78
You should know since Clara was your invention.
Sorry, but if you want to gain the confidence of the science community I suggest you stop acting like Noah Vosen and take a leap into the real world.
Get some rest sPam.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez Mark Gubbish cannot understand you Clara, but then who can, perhaps not even your insane multifaceted self. You invite Mark onto your video, by leaving a link to this video on his comments page and then block him after he continuously punked the crap out of you. Tell your Bernie phantom penis account that Fox News does not hire phantom jizz flingers like herself, especially when they try & fling their phantom jizz at halloween costumed carbon credits & dildos that you wear
LordMonckton78 3 months ago
@LordMonckton78
"punked the crap out of you"
You mean your constant childish referrals to dildos and penis'?
I'm sorry, but unlike you, I do not speak the language of Oiluminati, that sacred form of diatribe spoken by the many Corporate-sponsored Shrink-tanks that have been given the duty of rubbishing climate science.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez No Clara you just speak Randomlaughingman gubbish from WALLSTluminati.
You invite Mark Gubbish onto your clown video and than ban him for exposing you. You have never been a "straight shooter" but always wished you could be a poop shooter if you had a real penis. The dildo does not make it right for you. LOL
LordMonckton78 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez Oiluminati? And you talk about diatribe in the same sentence? I salute your balls. And your hypocrisy. Cute new term by the way. Ohnoes Teh Oiluminati Is Here To Mayk Plastic And Petural! I Mene Dey Is To Kill Uz! After all what have those oil companies ever done for us? Look around the room you're sitting in, do you see anything made from oil based products or which wouldn't be there but for cheap transport provided by petrol and diesel? We don't need the Oiluminati!
DufBeerDragon 3 months ago
@DufBeerDragon
Duh!
I bet it took you at least a week to compose this nonsense.
Get some rest (s)Pam.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@DufBeerDragon
BTW I enjoyed what Clara had to say about you AND I quote:
"you're a Montauk Project -programmed scumbag, used to harass proper real-humans like me, that's all you are - evil scum that exist just to fuck-up nature and gaians, to keep this reality a frequency-controlled hellworld.
kill yourself scumfuck"
Sort of sums you up in a nutshell doesn't it, sweetie pie. XXX
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez You've just painted Clara Luisa Massa as the model of rationality. I rest my case. Assuming this is not one of Clara's myriad sock puppet accounts of course, which it probably is.
DufBeerDragon 3 months ago
@DufBeerDragon
Listen, if Charles Manson calls you an idiot, why should I disagree?
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez Alright, now you just sound like a freakin' troll. If not then try to understand that finding yourself on the same side as Charles Manson or, even worse, Clara Massa, is nothing to be proud of.
DufBeerDragon 3 months ago
@DufBeerDragon
Oh really. And which Troll would that be?
The Stone trolls that accosted Bildo Baggins or the Tea Party Trolls that stink of Anne Coulter's gusset?
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez Yep, troll.
DufBeerDragon 3 months ago
@TheElasticJesusRez I love foe yay. Even if it is a bit disturbing when politically motivated.
DufBeerDragon 3 months ago
CLIMATE DENIAL SONG
A MUST SEE
please visit this link -
you won't be disappointed.
watch?v=TrURLJ6Vlsg
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
Thanks again to the maker of this video for highlighting the problem with these trolls online, and how they lie about climate change. And also how they harass and impersonate me and others in an effort to drive anyone away from talking about this issue.
Continued thanks.
Nightversionn 3 months ago
And the climate is still warming, despite the oil trolls posting their nonsense.
Nightversionn 3 months ago
I will have to go. I don't, unlike Nighty, get paid for my time.
Back a few years ago, Buzzlips warned me that Nighty was into entrapment.
I didn't listen and got banned for a year.
So watch, the whiner, when she yaps about cloning, harassment, whatever, that's what she is up to herself.
The squawking is to deflect the moderators from herself.
Beonda is one of the sock accounts.
By Nighty howling about harassment, Beonda is able to do just that.
It's a vicious circle, watch it!
patioperson 3 months ago
You are quite right Nightly. You deniers have no science, no rationality, etc.
The planet has been cooling for 13 years now.
Warming is so last century.
Get up to date on the scientific facts.
Who are you abusing now?
What ever you complain about is exactly what you're up to.
Us realists aren't stupid.
We know a scam when we see one.
patioperson 3 months ago
This video was farmed out to Disney Studios and the tab was paid by Greenwash. That's a fact. I'll google it and prove.
patioperson 3 months ago
@patioperson Which only goes to prove deniers have no science, no rationality, no morality (see this video about their misinformation and impersonation and abuse of people who talk about climate change.
The planet is still warming and energy policy needs to be addressed, duh?
Nightversionn 3 months ago
@patioperson
Since you refer to Pakistanis in the racist colloquial form then I suggest Walt Disney would prefer your warped, sick ideology, not mine.
TheElasticJesusRez 3 months ago
Here goes Nighty on her impersonating rampage again.
Nighty, I have no problem with you cloning Nightversion, I had so much trouble finding a handle, most were rejected as already taken, must be millions registered with Youtube. I was sitting on the patio one day and that's when I tried Patioperson and it wasn't taken, surprise.
What I do have a problem with is the fact that you impersonated another and then squawk when the same happens to you.
And I will repeat, I have only one account.
patioperson 3 months ago
@ClaraPhantompenis Hilarious that you continue to self congratulate yourself on this video. Did you ever figure out where that phantom jizz you flung ended up?
LordMonckton78 3 months ago
Thanks again ElasticJesus for making this video of the deniers and how they abuse me and others by impersonating us and harassing us.
Much appreciated!
Nightversionn 3 months ago
and also how Youtube allows it, which is why I am deeply thankful you took the time to try to shine a light on it. ;)
Nightversionn 3 months ago