Added: 3 years ago
From: ggyyvvxx
Views: 68,052
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,610)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • This guy is a fucking retard. I really wish the aliens would come back and get him and his people.

  • wow! never heard farakahn speak before. he is very thorough and effective

  • As a white blues musician, I feel a lot better already :)

  • 2:03 thats some beautiful stuff

  • Catholics also made people write with their right hand if they were left handed, kinda sounds like they were trying to stop right brain thinking from day one.

  • Human D.N.A. has many sources... out of africa is dated material.... it has been dis-proven.

  • @lemmyliquor

    cite reference for this outlandish claim. there is nooooooooo evidence of humanity prior to those found in Africa. If there are "many" sources as you say (which makes no sense whatsoever), please cite just 1 and a reference.

  • @DaVinciCode7733 You will find the same info I did if you search the obvious keywords. Your problem is what you are willing to give credit. Your problem isn't a lack of evidence it is a stubbornness. Kenwick man for instance was ignored until his C-date came back 9,000+ and the story broke. The govt confiscated Kenwick Man shortly there after. Post-Miocene apes weren't early humans they were a whole other species. There were several species of human alive simultaneously.

  • @lemmyliquor

    Kennwick man is under 9700 years old. That makes him archeologically young compared to the homosapien remains of Africa dated around 200,000 years old, and if they keep digging they will find even older ones. Africa is the ONLY land mass that contains the remains of every evolutionary step in human progression. From the oldest, to the current. They even have human remains in israel 400,000 years old (though the full spectrum of human evolution cannot be found there).

  • @lemmyliquor

    There are not, as you said, "many sources" of human DNA, because only one continent that has the full series of humanoid skeletal remains, and that is Africa. This is the consensus in the archeological community, so explain how this has been "dis-proven" with something more substantial than a 9000 year old.

  • This is pure ignorance. Farakhan does not understand genetics, Archaeology, History. Whenever blacks say that they are the first, they are only proving that they are the most UNEVOLVED.. You must all remember that there is such a thing as EVOLUTION.. And saying that you are the first and having the Gorilla heads and faces that you do, will only prove other Races of your bestial continuity as unevolved, missing links, that time and Evolution have completely forsaken...

  • @Philofor03

    People don't come from animals. Animals come from people.

  • @JusBeCuzz We all come from Atoms, from molecules, from animals, to Apes, to semi apes, to negroids... to Humans.. and then Who knows what else???

  • @Philofor03

    No, the original people of the earth did not come from animals of any kind.

  • @JusBeCuzz Ignorant, fantasies will not shield you from the objectivity of science...

    The Theory of Evolution is an Afrocentrists worst nightmare as is DNA evidence, Archaeology and Science in general, because their whole system of belief is based on misinformation, lies, resentment, and Hatred towards the Caucasian and Mongoloid Races that created everything... they have pure jealousy....

  • @Philofor03

    First of all, the term Caucasian has nothing to do with the whiteness of ones skin, but is simply an anthropological term of identification coined by a man prior to modern archeological evidence. Every human characteristic can be found in only 1 race of human being, and that is the African man. He has no predecessor and is the mother and father of both Mongoloid peoples and Europeans.

  • @Philofor03 bs

  • @Philofor03 well said.

    farrakhan / noi can't have the cake and eat it too.

  • I will not dare disrespect, any race in any way. I see many people being disrespectful but, I will look into this DNA testing and history.

  • TELL IT FROM THE MOUNTAIN TOP TALK TO THEN CRACKERS OUT THERE BR FARRAKHAN WE LOVE YOU.

  • Farrakhan is a fucking idiot. Everyone knows the hhuman species came from Africa. All of you idiots on here that call white people mutants and shit are equally as stupid. He talks about respecting the black man. The black man has no respect for the white man, why should whitey respect him? Look at Africa. See how well that country is doing? Yes, we cam from the black man. We EVOLVED from the black man. We're all the same, but the black man won't let us be equal. Fucking crybabies.

  • @mike112769 You are ignorant of your White-Devil Race.... The Original Man (Blackman) don't respect you and other white folks because of 400 years of slavery and oppression.... Mexicans and native americans don't respect you because you have robbed them of their land with trickery & force of the U.S. Treaty.

  • @mike112769

    You said "look at Africa". The only reason that Africa is in the condition that it is in is because it is dependent on Europe (when they shouldn't be). How can you say blacks in Africa don't respect white people? They love white people. thats why they continue to be taken advantage of by white people. They do so foolishly though.

    Black people don't rule the world. When we do rule again, we will set up a righteous government where you can be equal.

  • yea the omecs was the first blacks in the world before christopher columbus

  • Ham is pronounced HAAM or like Mu Ham mad to the white geniuses out there.

  • The truth hurts I know !... But u whitey know it's the truth being told on theses vids that's why u stay obsessed with what we are learning about u ... And u throw a tantrum call us monkey and nigger like the silly little pink creature that u are thinking that will change the truth that u are rotting away becoming exstinct birth rate at zero...melanin the key to life we LOVE ur enemy the SUN !!

  • I guess the WHOLE WORLD needs to go back to africa...

  • @lemmyliquor

    Yes! We do need to "go back to africa" as you say. When the rule of the white race is over we (black,brown,red,yellow,white) will all "go back to africa", meaning spiritually, the righteous government of the Blackman will allow all peoples of the earth peace and brotherhood.

  • NIGGER SAYS THAT YOU ARE STUPID,,,SLOW,,,BOY,,,CHUMP,,U­NAWARE..IT IS AN INVENTED TERM BY THE SLAVEMASTER...THAT SAYS YOUR ASS IS MINE..AND SO IS YOUR WIFE AND DAUGHTER........TO DO ANYTHING I WANT TO DO WITH IT...WHENEVER I WANT TO ... YOU CAN BE A NIGGER TO IF YOU WANT TO

  • Comment removed

  • Ham? Yeah, give me a Ham Sandwich and a beer.

  • wow!

  • Comment removed

  • it was a mix of their perception of other kingdoms gods and maigc the oldest belief system even before organized religion in the 3000 bc in mesopotania babylon persia india... africans were totally asleep as civilization goes, and their backwardness goes on to the day, in tahiti in the year 2011 blacks believe in magic esoteric notions of the world its always what blacks go back to, theres something wrong with that, not being able to see the logic behind all things that surround us

  • blacks say we took their civilization cultue language away, ut infact even the biggest black kingdoms in africa were just living in huts and gathering food and hunting there was no wirtten language no specific culture just a confused mix of languages no recorded history no structures whatsoever usually a lazy fat king that woul sell his ppl for guns and alcohol this could not go on forever humans need to evolve or perish, world only gets older, they idnt even had a religious belief of gods

  • when whites lost their skin colour they lost a part that is emotional in order to see life more objectivly, and in fact contribute more to scoeity of human as a whole this is why i believe whites should not mix thousands of years to adapt thrown out the window, all races must exist they are adaptations to the land where they live, im against multi racial multi cultural societys that just menas the bastardization of culture and race until we are just a mass of ppl without identity or knowledge

  • white ppl are not albinos albinos are ppl with recessive genes, those genes where triggered because the lack of sun and ice ages in north europe and russia ppl that lived there had been losing their skin colour for ages that was the last drop for the lost of melanin nature give them a bigger sense of logic in order to survive everytime nature takes something it gives also something else in order to adapt, if you loose sight hearing and taste go up etc, also happens with races

  • This is not wisdom. This is GOBBLEDY GOOK!

  • @ 718SOPHINE Well if we are just albinos and still black as you say, then why can't we say nigger without you reacting violently?

  • @Lemoine1476 because it is a word that is coming from a hateful place...

  • @excaliba360 but im still black, just an albino. right? so their should be no difference.....

  • @Lemoine1476 If you are White you are not a black person, an albino is still a black person. White people are a product of selective breeding(grafting)...that is how u became white if you didnt know...just like the white lab rat, thats not the natural mice, the white one comes from graftind that brown mice

  • @reedmesh oh yes, I know what Master Fard Muhammad and the Honorable Elijah Muhammad taught your people about the origin of the White Race and the making of the Devil. Breeding the lighter unto the lighter to finally make us. Is that right? Quite clever way to uplift a down and out people.

  • @Lemoine1476

    correction... albino with up to 4% Neanderthal DNA (if european or asia).

  • @DaVinciCode7733 Interesting theories, but does not answer my question. Most of my well-educated Black friends who have responded to my comment,such as yourself if you are indeed Black, still have not said why I can't call you nigger if I am just an albino with 4% Neanderthal DNA

  • @Lemoine1476

    the same reason I can't call you a bitch without you reacting violently. It's not the word, but your reason for using the word, and the history associated with a certain people using that word. That should be fairly obvious to anyone with some common sense. Ask yourself why you are soooo eager to call a black man a nigger. Sensible black people don't like other black people calling them "nigga" either, so why would they like you doing it?

  • I will concede a portion of my argument, in retrospect, for clarification. I defiantly combined separate sources and theories into 1, and presented it as a consensus. A dietary supplementation of vitamin D, as well as a compensation trade off of ACTIVE melanin for hair, due to their uses is also a possible set of factors. I confused your position as being that whites did not come from blacks at all.

  • @DaVinciCode7733 I was confused as well. But yes I am aware that Black people are the original. DNA and archealogical points to East Africa.In essence you are our ancestrial mother and father.I would never argue with that.

  • Comment removed

  • Respond to this video... Because an inferior albino should know its place!

  • @Lemoine1476 You are a moron! :)

  • Comment removed

  • @Lemoine1476 The word "nigger" is a derogatory word that was/is used to describe an ignorant, inept, violent being. In my opinion it describes the acts and lifestyle of those who founded this country(assuming it's america) which was built on ignorance and intolerance. Race should never have become the deciding factor in who is entitled to what in this world, because in the end we are from the same roots like it or not.

  • @Lildre320 I am aware of what the word means. I said that because I was sarcastically responding to the ignorant fool who claims whites are albino. With that being said, why haven't you replied to the comments calling white people pink mutants or that god will destroy us with our "enemy" the sun? Why not go after ALL the ignorant people?

  • @Lemoine1476

    mutant is a scientific term, designated for something that has mutated from it's original form. It has a negative connotation, depending on the context in which it is used, but if human originated in equatorial Africa, (which science say they did), then they originated with high levels of melanin. If whites are not of that "original" makeup, due to climatic conditions, which forced there genes to compensate - or- mutate, then the word is valid in the proper context.

  • @Lemoine1476

    It is not ignorant to say that whites come from albinos, because climate alone isn't a significant enough factor to prompt such a dramatic evolutionary genetic change over a few thousand years. By your assertion, the Eskimos, the People of Tibet, and other melananted people stand to eventually turn white if they are in cold areas. There is NO precedence for that idea. Would you like to see a white scientist explain this to you as well? youtube "origin of human races"

  • @DaVinciCode7733 The fact that the scientist is white will in no way influence my opinion of his works.The reason why eskimos and other cold climate inhabitants may not have lighter skin because the ozone layer is not as strong and allows UV to go right through,hence the need for melanin.In any case,I must be the exception to the albino mutant theory.When I am in the bright sun for too long I tan,like most White people.We can produce melanin when needed, so how does that make us albinos?

  • Comment removed

  • @Lemoine1476

    Your skin will bronze, to a certain degree, after which it will undoubtedly peel and burn. Keep in mind, we are talking about the 'origins' of the white race, not contemporary people. Think about it like a litter of puppies. You will have all different colors in one litter. The only way to produce a consistent color is to isolate the breeding. If mankind began as a single species with a single origin, and that species was heavily melanated, then sitting those people

  • @DaVinciCode7733 No, my family has never been mixed. Unlike you I can trace my ancestry. I do not peel and burn.There are no degrees of albinism. Your assertions are based on the "Melanin Theory". A racist and pseudo-scientific thought process used by Black Nationalists meant to make the White Race seem weak and inferior compared to darker skinned people. While you speak many truths, lies are almost perfectly blended. As a nationalist myself, I would use the same tactics.

  • @Lemoine1476

    You can trace your ancestry how far?! A few hundred years? Certainly not 400,000 plus years. What is your nationality and phenotype? Blonde w/ blue eyes? Brown? From what region? You claim is purely speculation, and assumption that people intend to insult or harm you. I can show you multiple white scientist who will tell you the exact same thing, so how can it be a black agenda? It's just a pill you refuse to swallow.

  • @Lemoine1476

    Why do you think true blondes can only produce more blondes by mating with other blondes? Because dominant DNA will always overpower the recessive. This is why albinos who mate with albinos can ONLY produce albino children. I'm not a nationalists, but a realist. I base my argument on common sense, and science, not sensitive speculation. Show precedence for your claims and prove me wrong, rather than getting emotional. Give me some facts.

  • @DaVinciCode7733 Ablino children do not produce albino children, you should probably at a legitimate source for Albinism not a Black supremacist site like most of these people.

  • I dont visit black supremacist sites for information. Google the question and get a little understanding. An albino parent may have around a 25% chance of producing an albino child, if they mate with a non-albino. This is based on the % of genetic distribution from each. 2 Albino parents, increase the % considerable. The children of those children increase the % even more, and so on and so forth. Being that you carry all of your ancestral DNA, you will of course have a crap shoot

  • @Lemoine1476

    of producing either an anomaly somewhere down the line, but that depends on the genetics of your partner. I have white ancestry, but if I mate with a Pure blood african woman, and our kids do the same, and there kids do the same, do you think my great great great grand child will be white? Only if he is albino. I might pass on a trait, such as lighter eyes, or fairer skin, but the dominance of his genetics will overwhelming express itself in his other features.

  • @Lemoine1476

    The same goes with white children. You might have minor genetic expressions of your melanated ancestry, giving you the ability to tan, or dark hair etc, but the if the majority of you and your mates genetic makeup is recessive, the chances are overwhelmingly high that your offspring will express a similar genetic % of recessive features... It's pure science, math, and common sense.

  • @DaVinciCode7733 i know. I will say it again, I am only arguing with your assertion about albinism

  • @Lemoine1476

    Who is your oldest ancestor? How far back does he go, and where is he from? I bet I can prove you wrong, and i'm sure you know it in your heart, you just have so much animosity against black people you refuse to accept that you come from us. We CERTAINLY don't come from you, and no one in a position of scientific authority is arguing that fact.

  • @DaVinciCode7733 My oldest ancestor comes from East Africa and she lived about 60,00 years ago. I never said you came from us and I do not deny the truths you speak.I do not have animosity toward Black people, I greatly respect my acestrial mother and father. The original comment if you remember I posted was not meant to be answered, it was for a reaction out of an ignorant people making stupid comments and I know the answer. You are not ignorant, quite inteligent, more so than most on here.

  • in Europe for a few thousand years is not sufficient to completely inverse the genetic expressions. Recessing the DNA must occur first, and then it will stabilize itself with repetition. It wont work in reverse, because of the effects of sun on non-melinated skin. It would cause high levels of skin cancer, burning, and other UV related afflictions- this is why the life expectancy of Albinos in Africa is so short. At this point in time your family line has, undoubtedly been mixed

  • With those who have been mixed, with those who have been mixed, providing a certain amount of dominant DNA. This would put you on the lesser end of the spectrum of albinism, though on the further spectrum of original DNA composition. Cold, alone is not sufficient- hence the reason polar bears still have black skin. It would take a dramatic transformation or 'mutation' to dilute the dominant levels of melanin in its skin cells. The only precedence for that in nature are

  • vitiligo, and albinism. If you have a precedence for it other than the ones I have mentioned, please inform me (im not being sarcastic). Search the entirety of the world and show me white families producing black children. The most you may get is a random expression of dominant genes from an ancestor who was melanated. This might show as blonde parents producing brown eyed, brown haired children. I can show you multitudes of black/brown parents producing white children.

  • @DaVinciCode7733 Sir, the only reason Black people produce "White" children is because a faulty gene you had made them White. Our whitness is from environmental changes and yes the environmental is more than enough. We still contain the dark genes from the original Black people. We are indeed able to produce a slightly darker skinned person than ourselves. It is you are uable to make a light skinned person from your own genes unless they have mutated.I know Black Nationalist theories quite well

  • @Lemoine1476

    Cite precedence for your OPINIONS. Give me some natural examples, rather than your emotional claims. Show me some science. Do you assert that the white communities in Africa will eventually become black people, if they never mix with them? Where is your reference for anything you say? I just watched a National Geographic video stating my same claims, so don't cop out and blame what I say on nationalism, which I told you I am not.

  • @DaVinciCode7733 The last thing I care to say is that I tried disproving anyhting you said other than the notion that White people are decended from albino mutants or whatever you wish to call them. I am fully aware that ALL people are from what is now East Africa and we decend from Blck people. You are our mother and father. Both of us are stating and arguing fact, which leads no where.Just your claim with albinism and White people is not meant to be factual but uplift a down and out people.

  • @Lemoine1476 I never tried*

  • @Lemoine1476

    people dont get lighter and lighter and lighter based on where they live. There is no precedence for that idea, other than outdated scientific theory. Fact is, in both ancient africa, and modern africa, albinos were considered lepors. FACT, not to insult anyone. They were usually killed or cast out and made colonies for themselves. As the populations migrated, the colonies thrived and survived in the colder regions of the world, until an eventual isolation.

  • @Lemoine1476

    This could be a geographic isolation due to ice age, or a cultural isolation, but all the evidence points to this fact. Its not opinion just because it sounds harsh or some find it insulting. It is just where the facts and evidence points to. This is why the mainstream & many fringe scientific communities agree on that exact theory. We could argue this all day, but I doubt you can provide any contemporary information supporting the opposite, which hasn't been refuted.

  • can i have the site you used?

    

  • @Lemoine1476 Because thats not a race of people that word is used to try to degrade.

  • Y is it so hard for white people too understand that regardless weather we evolved from apes or not the first human race on earth is BLACK! Period. You turn white after all the albino people was cast away. Your still black! Do your homework... Everybody knows the truth now. Thank you white scientists! Damn... What you white people thinking? Blonde hair blue eyes was first??? Lol, albino.... Think about it

  • not all white people have the albino gene.... Its been proven that black and asians share a common ancestor, but not with white. Have you ever seen a black and white albino standing together? They look nothing alike other then white hair and blue eyes lol. Did you know the oldest mummy/skeleton found is that of a caucasian?

  • @DyingOphilia

    Do you know that "Caucasian" is not exclusive to white people? It is a term centered around a difference in skeletal structure, and location, and has nothing to do with color. That is a provable misnomer and assumption by people who don't care to look it up. I can also show you black albinos that look EXACTLY like white people, down to the texture of their hair. This is because there is a spectrum of albino, from slightly recessed to FULLY recessed.

  • not all white people have the albino gene.... Its been proven that black and asians share a common ancestor, but not with white. Have you ever seen a black and white albino standing together? They look nothing alike other then white hair and blue eyes lol. Did you know the oldest mummy/skeleton found is that of a caucasian?

  • The color of blackness is not a symbol of a divine curse. In fact, it was never "blackness" per se that caused whites to hold blacks in contempt, to take advantage of them. It was African civilizational backwardness that caused this contempt, causing the color black to became associated negatively. Also, I wouldn't want to call blacks the "originals." Because that implies that other races evolved beyond them, hence the dramatic differences in racial performance and accomplishment today.

  • @takfam07

    another error. It is not an evolutionary advantage for an individual to lose the ability to survive in the sun, long term. It is a conditional circumstance, that only serves as an advantage in a small, remote location like the mountains and hills of Europe. It only implies that. Why do you think the oldest civilization remains are that of African origin, and the ancient whites were deemed "barbarians". Where did they learn their sciences, and use of speech? Africa- provable.

  • Mitochondrial dna wasn't originated in Africa it was originated in central Asia.

  • @Mokdo68 Come on get with the program. Even the Asian geneticists conclude that they are from African lineage

  • @Mokdo68. Come on now. What information do you have to back up this statment?

  • Look at the Muslim slave trade in the Sudan today and the tell me why an American black would want to be a Muslim. Why not go back to traditional tribal religions instead of following Arabs that cant stand your race.

  • @MrWolfgang68

    A muslim who enslaves, murders, and exploits ANYONE isn't practicing Islam, no more than the KKK was practicing Christianity by burning crosses and killing black people. Same with Judaism. People tend to confuse the pure form of a religion with the CULTURE of those who claim to practice that religion. Ask yourself who the original "Arab" ( which is a new term) was. The original Jew? It's about origin and pure form, not adopting a culture.

  • adam, the FIRST black man rebelled against god...cain, the FIRST murder was a black-man...ghee, is the inheritance of rebellion / murder / sin / deception / wickedness etc., caused via the black man?

    the origin of the human being is a chimpanzee...96-98% of our DNA is identical to the chimps...the black mans ancestors are chimpanzees... :o

    now, what's the purpose of the evolutionary processes?

    * were we ( homosapiens) PUT / PUT / put on this planet to rule or to be SLAVES ?

  • @afterray

    Can you show and prove on your chimp theory? I can show and prove that you whites was born with tail on your spine and walk with all four like a dog.

  • @GTpanik show and prove? if your question is serious, then i must say to your brain, bye - bye.

    i found it very funny how certain BENT mind frames address me as a "white". oh, let me guess, my comments / questions define my race...

  • @afterray

    If you can't prove your theory, then you need to keep quiet.

  • @GTpanik dude.

    1st ur BENT mind defined my comments / questions as being a "white" person...NOW, u r talking about theory. theory?

    * to prove how ur thinking is BENT :

    u theorized that i was "white". sadly said, u can't prove it.

    NOW, ur BENT ways are asking a Q about the science of DNA (oh, let me guess. u think that DNA is a theory) n its connection to the CHIMPANZEES.

    * i understand that u r timid of ur Ancestors being CHIMPS.

    WAKE UP !

    the fossil LUCY was found in africa.

    bye - bye 

  • @afterray

    Again, if you can't prove that we was made from chimps, then you need to shoot yourself.

  • @GTpanik this is for you / farrakhan / NOI :

    YOUTUBE: the origin of the Blacks

    olmec98 5:00 mins

    * the sane knows that the deeper we dig, the CLOSER we come in contact with the apes...of course, many will feel the discomfort of their ancestors being apes ( i understand that fear)...reality can make / BREAK a person.

    having a high ego about ones race can be shattered by CLEAR science...

    peace.

  • @afterray

    It would only bug me if it was true. Now, you trying to bring this notion that you aren't white. I don't really give a damn that if you are white or not. And I know all of this crap comes from white racist crackers.

  • @GTpanik ADVICE :

    * take a good / deep / intense look in the mirror (YOUTUBE: the origin of the Blacks)...reality awaits YOU :(

    it doesn't matter whether it's true of not, the NOI ( FAKE muslims) / farrakhan and people like yourself are hiding...that's ok, i understand your denial...BUT your hate / feeble mind to the side.

    ** YOUTUBE: the origin of the Blacks **

    this is an educational / unbiased sound tool for those that respect the APES...many like-yourself (gtp) FEAR YOUR OWN :(

    bye.

  • @afterray

    If you can't prove on the NOI is fake, then keep quiet. Plus, I'm not an NOI, but an NGE. Do more research.

  • @afterray

    watch?v=xXpng87p4Kc

    Don't be afraid of yourself now.

  • @GTpanik i must admit, that's distrusting...however, IF you think that i'm a european, and feel offended by this, you are dead wrong ( nice try)...i can understand your fear of acknowledging your ape ancestors.

    yeah, your fear makes you not accept knowledge of self ( APE / LUCY)...

    * watch, Ardi- Ardipitherus ramaidus and human evolution.

    LOOK in the mirror after seeing this science.

    by the way, i fear not...for knowledge of self is respecting Africa AND the fossil LUCY... :( 

  • @afterray

    i can tell you this satan. Just as much the blackman here in America is dumb,deaf,and blind because of the white satan raped us, you also went all over the 196,940,000 sq miles of this planet and raped it's people and it's resources. I don't even understand why blacks love Christianity and that religion had alot of doing in the slave trade just like the so-called white jews had a role,and the Arabs too. Just like you have the blacks love that white Jesus here, you

  • @afterray

    have raped and still raping Africa from it's resources, you are still bring your diseases like AIDS,HIV,chickenpox,homosexual­ly,and etc., and you will be known as what the bible states as lucifer as a man the man who raped and brought tyranny to the world.

  • @afterray

    Your claims are not even biblical, seeing as how the descendants of Cain died in the biblical flood of Noah. Secondly, google "chimpanzee". The majority of those you see will be of white skin. ALL of what you see will have a texture of hair similar to who? Eye color similar to who? Damn sure isn't black people. What is an Amorite? What did they look like, and who does the bible describe them as being? Coming from what family line?

  • @DaVinciCode7733 "Your claims are not even biblical" ?

    LUCY was before the bible...

    :o

    the pyramids were before the bible...

    :o

    elijah's BENT theological views of the orginalman, compels the sane to address the BENT minds toward LUCY ---- of course, the BENT minds of the noi will hide behind a rock.

    also, elijah's BENT views of theism clearly contradicts the canonical essays.

    we can commence of that view...i hope that you are reasonable. * if not, then you have already won...

  • @afterray

    What does Lucy being before the bible have to do with anything whatsoever? Lucy (The species Australopithecus Afarensis) is NOT Homo Sapien (modern human), and neither is a Neanderthal. Modern science says the only pure Homo Sapiens on the planet are Africans... Every other race has a certain % of Neanderthal DNA, which can be seen as the result of 1 of 2 things...

  • @afterray

    (continued)

    The Africans were the first fully evolved human beings and the Neaderthals never quite caught all the way up, or the modern human interbred- mixing with the Neaderthal DNA. In this context, the order would be: Chimp->Lucy-> Neanderthal-> Human... Either way, the non African DNA is much closer to the chimp than modern human beings.

  • @DaVinciCode7733 "The Africans were the first fully evolved human beings"

    "evolved"

    thank you.

    "Either way, the non African DNA is much closer to the chimp than modern human beings." ?

    a clear bent equation of yours...read it again.

  • @DaVinciCode7733 "google "chimpanzee"" thanks for the reference.

    the pendulum must be equal. therefore, i suggest that you look up the following reference:

    youtube: the origin of blacks

  • @DaVinciCode7733 * i'm far from arguing who's better, the blacks or the whites.

    i detest any apologists for afrocentrism crap / europeanism crap...

    * my poring have given me an unequivocal judgement : the NOI is a fake / elijah mohammad was an adulterer / impostor...many BENT minds of the noi hated malcolm x ( RIP)...THEN the bullets.

    the originalmans noi creed is pathetic ( it might please certain egos)...em had zero understanding of the grammatization of hebrew...

  • @afterray

    If you want to attribute atrocities to a race, over the past 6000 years, which race has murdered more human beings? Just in the 1900's alone, Europeans (both in Europe and the American settlers) have genocides exceeding 130 million humans! That 1.3 million people a year! and thats a conservative number. Add the 1800's and that number jumps to 300 million, making it around 1.5 million people EVERY YEAR. these are your own peoples stats.

  • @DaVinciCode7733 "these are your own peoples stats." ?

    that's ok.

    *<

  • @afterray

    I also to hate to burst your bubble, but the bible isn't an historical account. Most of it is written in metaphor and parable, which has to be decifered and studied. Cain was afraid that others would find him and kill him because of his mark. Killed by who? The pre-adamite people of the Earth is who. That means the story of Adam and Eve would be an account of a people OTHER than the original people of the Earth. Sons of God versus the sons of man.

  • @DaVinciCode7733 "the bible isn't an historical account." ?

    come on now.

    do i need to correct you...your thinking isn't for me ( sorry / help me) --- you talk about " cain / pre-adamites". true, there were others out there...BUT, he (cain) was already a murderer...before cain, adam / eve rebelled...

    * so, it's clear that the "original peoples of the earth", were the first to rebel / commit murder. true ( before the white man)...

  • first off humans didn't evolve from apes. Humans are a seperate species ok. The theory of evolution suggest that in order for evolution to take place, the species that has been evolved from has to die off. So if we indeed evolved from apes then they would have died off a long time ago.

  • There is a whole race of genetic recessive people, how did that happen? If the answer that is given by past 'scientific discoveries' is correct, why is the 'caucasian scientific community' still searching for their origin on our planet? I submit to you today that 'white supremacy' has shaded any discovery that tells the truth of their true origin on our planet.

  • hahahah was that al sharpton? hahahaha nigga look like a clown

  • @nem700 yeah that man does look like sharpton...omg

  • IF cane was a black man, THEN the FIRST cold blooded murder (EVER) was the black man...that is if that myth is true.

  • the conclusion that TODAY´s blacks are fathers and mothers of all humans is wrong.

    It is even wrong that today´s blacks are equal to those blacks of that prehistorical time. we are all Africans, whites and blacks. But neither whites nor blacks (or asians) are the same as that protohumans were. We ALL have mutated and evolved. Indeed, Farrakhan´s conclusion is dangerous as it can be misused by white supremacists who claim that blacks are not fully evolved. So, be careful with pseudo-science.

  • @ulizinho Thank you so much for saying that! I agree

  • @ulizinho Pseudo-Science is that which is not verified by the 'scientific method'. What Minister Farrakhan referenced is called 'Mendelian Law'. Far from being pseudo-science, this 'Mendelian Law' is used in almost every aspect of life known today, especially in farm animals. White chickens, white mice, white horses, and any other animal desired are bred using the principle of 'Mendelian Law' to extract from the black (dark) creature that which is recessive.

  • @PainoftheAncestors

    Are you really going to discuss genetics with me?

    Go to university and discuss your theses with real experts, if I am not sufficient for you.

    There is simply no truth in saying that today blacks are the original men. I even doubt that there is any value in the concept of "original man at all. "What is that?

    What does it mean to you, that the phenotype white is due to a recessive gene?

    It is obvious that Farrakhan here is misusing science for his political agenda.

  • @ulizinho You apparently have a mindset that you are very vested in, regardless of scientific fact. What I said previously is not a 'thesis', ( correct way of spelling it by the way ) but age old genetic reality. I believe you to be a truth seeker as I am. As one you must weigh your current beliefs with curent fact. I am not a genetic specialist, I am an Electrical Engineer by profession. Look up 'white baby born to black parents'!

  • @PainoftheAncestors

    "You apparently have a mindset that you are very vested in, regardless of scientific fact. "

    Are you talking to yourself? I am sorry about the typo, I am not a native speaker.

    You are right, that white babies can be born by black parents, the reverse is quite unlikely. But what does that show? That blacks are superior, moraly ? This argument about the originality is simply futile, as it does not help blacks at all. By the way, I am a chemist, not biologist.

  • @PainoftheAncestors

    The DNA of any lifeform shows the phenomenon of mutation. Chemistry. Whether mutations are "good" or "bad" for the offspring is due to selection. First humanoids presumbly had dark skin, their apelike ancestors probably had lighter skin underneath their fur. Since those prehistorical time, many mutations must have occured, TO ALL populations, black, yellow or pink. So, to claim that today´s blacks are "original" is a wrong conclusion of the Out of Africa theory.

  • @ulizinho First, I must say to you that I appriciate the dialogue that we are having. I hope others on youtube could see our disscusion and learn how to disagree and still be civil. I respect your passion and seeming vigilance against all forms of supremacy. However, the conclusion that modern humans evolved from 'apes' is still 'theory', a 'theory' that has not been verified by 'scientific method' to become fact. I will answer your questions in your post tomorrow, have a good day man! :)

  • @PainoftheAncestors

    So you got the facts on your side? But what are your conclusions? Have you never thought, that calling blacks "original human" could be misinterpreted as racist statement? In fact, stupid white supremacists of American Renaissance are using Farrakhan´s argument, that blacks would be a kind of "missing link", with blacks still at "original" semi-apelike state, whites at a more evolved state. The "Original"-argument is pseudo-scientific and racist, both to whites AND blacks.

  • @ulizinho Finally, the only modern people who can reproduce 'non-albino whites' are modern day blacks. You speak only with half knowledge. The same 'scientific' sources you get your information about proto-humans, is the same racist scientific mindset that put all the accomplishment of the pryamids to 'alien' intervention.

  • this man is contagious 

  • He is talking about the "Mitochondrial EVE"......

  • There is no and has not been a Catholic theology that says black people are cursed with dark skin. The mormons however have taught "the curse of Ham" up until 1978 - which is sad.

  • Farrakhan is a BIG GOOF... yeah? Just sayin' ;)

  • lol this guy sounds like a white supremacist but the other way around. The reason why there still racism in America is because of people like him If there is nuclear war right now Blacks, Whites, mice, dogs, cats, etc will all die. Now who is superior? People need to get there pride out of there ass, and start fighting the real enemy.

  • Depends on how far back you consider ancients. Whether it was 10500 bc or 30,000 bc, still appears impossible yet they built them somehow and you nor anyone else knows for sure how they did it. What relevence is the Gulf of Tonkin incident? My main point here is that it is not truly known WHEN they were built, despite your and others measurements you cant be 100%. Which shows my disagreement with the mainstream, unlike what you say about me. Maybe look up the definition of mainstream.

  • I LOVE IT!

  • PEACE TO THE GOD!

    

  • look at them white people in the crowd 3:11 ..lol priceless

  • @stfameent lol

  • @tigersforchrist if you follow jesus, then you should know not to condemn others. and LOVE THY NEIGHBOR, WHOEVER THEY MAY BE idiot

  • Looks like Obama asking the question....

  • I'll respond to your question about the pyramids tommorow if you would like to know my thoughts on that.

  • Im glad that I can educate you that you(blacks) are not the fathers of civilization. I have educated you on the reasoning behind that and you are uncapable of posting a valid argument back therefore you must realize that your previous statements are false. Your comments back to me on two different occasions show no intelligent response to back up your theory on what makes your people the father of civilization. The chances of you teaching me something that I haven't already read is slim. OK?

  • @Doughost26

    Firstly i think you mean INcapable*.

    Africans are indeed the father of civilization. Aside from us being the oldest, we have the oldest empires known to date. Its undebatable because its proven fact.

  • @TheAncientX Didnt realize that you were so smart and never misspell a word. Its a retarded debate, considering we all came from there at some point. To say that any particular race is the father of civilization is ignorant. Also dont believe everything that archeologists tell you. Im sure you think that it is a proven fact that blacks built the pyramids too.

  • @Doughost26

    Im not smart at all. I know what i know and thats all i know.

    No, you are incorrect again. One race is responsible. Humans are a Race. A single race. I think what you mean is ethnicity. And yes i say you should give credit where credit is do. Africans Have the oldest civilizations. When the Human race branched out they all took what they learned and continued with it. What we have today is the result of all groups working together.

  • @TheAncientX Sorry but I think you still got it wrong. When talking in those terms I think that humans are a SPECIES. An evolved talking monkey, thats what we all are that, is our species Race in the past was usually the location and/or your parental genes branched out and slightly different than other parts of the human species.You said "humans are a race", I believe there are different races and then within those races is where ETHNICITY comes into play, the branching out of a certain race.

  • @Doughost26 Im not suggesting in any way that whites built the pyramids. I suggest that up to this point there has been no evidence to clearly say who built them or even when. The pyramids could have been built over 30,000 years ago for all we know. Many believe that the human species has risen and fallen many times over but never went quite extinct. Humans were always VERY migratory, mostly because of food or environment. I dont believe that any "race" should claim they built the pyramids.

  • Please dont come back with Egyptologists claims, because most of them in order to be an Egyptologist they have to accept certain facts that their counterparts claim. I get frustrated when blacks talk about how great their race is and then they claim they built the pyramids when in fact it is truly unknown. The location of the pyramids also makes it more difficult to get an idea of who built them as that is near a crossroads of different races/ethnicities.

  • @Doughost26 Another thing to think about is the theory that the original builders left the Pyramids and migrated, and then a new group of people, the Egyptians moved in, and wrote on them, originally the Pyramids were supposed to have had little to no drawings on them. If you think of the Mayan people and their Pyramids they did the same, they left for unknown reasons, so I could see this possibility as well. Whats up with the capstones on the Pyramids? Any thoughts on whats up with them?

  • @Doughost26 Rephrase that, the capstones that aren't there.....

  • @Doughost26 you too take a look at Black Kings of Nubia/Kush

    

  • @Doughost26

    The locatio