Zionist False Flag Operations:1946 Bombing of King David Hotel,Israelis dressed as Arabs 1954 Levone Affair, Israelis blew up American Instillations in Cairo to blame Egypt 1967 USS Liberty attacked by Israelis,34 Americans killed 170 wounded, to blame Egypt 1968 US Embassy attacked by Israeli commandos in Amman, to blame Jordan 1986 Berlin Disco bombing by Israel, to blame Lybia 2001 Israel attacks on 9/11.1st blamed on Palestinians by Mossad Agents Caught on scene. 911 ✡ ✈ ▌▌
That's about the funniest fake plane I've seen thus far..lol Amazingly we are, once more seeing the nose sticking out. I think it was a missile, The fireball, from this angle shows the characteristics of a classic thermobaric exploosion. Thanks for input on mandatory investigations...G:
No Planers are OBVIOUSLY disinformation agency. Their objective is to smother the truth with ludicrousness.
Considering that after the first plane hit, which would likely not be captured by any videos, its obvious that half of new yorkers with a handy cam would be filming the towers as the north tower burnt from the crash - thus many many people would capture NO PLANE hitting the tower. HENCE, no one would ever consider FAKING planes. Why fake a perfect smart bomb anyways? Idiots!
@KombiPode I was thinking the same thing about you. No planes were revcovered at the site and the planes that you saw live that convivced you were from a controlled produced news feed. No "hmmm" flags go up? There were no hijackers, the names made up from FBI and CIA lists and living people, the videos have conflicting issues, there were no planes recovered, the plane story was filled with lies, the plane victims families did not collect the fund, all four planes are one event.
1. There is no reason why using real planes is not an excellant idea when you have the Douv Zakheim remote anti-hijack system which has a POD on the underbelly of a 767 used for NASA and which COINCIDENTALLY looks exactly like the pod you see on the underbelly.
2. An incalculable number of neighbours in highrises all around will have their handycams trained on the towers after the first hit...their videos will show no plane....
@KombiPode The wings failed to recieve the same force they delivered at the same instant they delivered it. There is no wake turbulance that comes off the wings of all large jet aircraft that hits the 200 yards of blasted concrete that comes out of the entry hole. The videos are all suspiciosly fake and the source cannot be trusted. Even the amatuer videos came through the FBI and NYPD first. The only way to make a hole from a collision is loss of velocity and mass, we see neither.
@KombiPode Clearly even the story you are pushing, the underbelly bullshit does not adress the physics issues .... its more diversion and theory for fools that dont understand the basicws to chase after. Run down the rabbit hole looking for a whack a mole, because you dont even have a clue how to test anything you are parroting. Use science, not what Dov or your favorite paid reporter says. Science says you are miserably wrong and keeping the lie alive. This a troll spam attack?
"Hey, but after the first bomb blows the north tower then everyone in new york in all the apartment buildings and offices with views of the towers will have their handycams out and will record the second tower being blown and there will be no plane in their footage. We will be caught red-handed"
The decide, "Dont worry about it. Lets just take the risk"
@Marquez What part dont you get shitbrains? The laws of motion, never disproven in 400 years say you are wrong. Want to test it? Punch yourself in the face as hard as you can. You will feel the same force in both your fist and face, equally in opposition. If the energy available to punch a hole in the building is velocity and mass, how did the plane punch a hole without losing velocity or mass instantly? We have scientific benchmarks to test your caveman theory. It fails reality
Plane looks like it did what it would do to me. I have looked at this numb nut wankers liek you before. Dont you think that the Mossad's military physicists wouldn't know to make the simulations look consistent with natural laws? Fucking dick.
And like I said, why on earth would they be so insane to have NO PLANES at WTC when you know everyone will be pointing a camera on the second hit? Fuck you are brainwashed. MENTAL BLOCK.
@MarquezDamas How about the vans full of israelis that were detained and later released at the request of a dual citizen american politician.. explosives in the vans, ppL dancing at the sight of building smoldering, and they also had cameras trained on the building before the first plane hit, they were just waiting for it to arrive..
How come they were not worried about all the cameras (commercial and private) which would be trained on the towers after the first plane hit?
How were they not worried that 20 recordings might pop up where you can not see the plane in the footage?
Oh, guess what - There is no such recordings. Funny that huh?
One could never guesshow many impromptu videographers there would be ready after the first plane hit and the tower is burning. FUCK WIT. BRAIN FUCKTARD.
@MarquezDamas You repeat the parroted script line but reject the scientific proofs, that tells us everything we need to know about you. There is not one 9/11 video you or I have ever seen that did not come through the FBI or NYPD first .... not one. The video is the easiest evidence to fake, the laws of motion are not so easily fooled. The force to punch a hole is mass and velocity, neither lost when the hole is punched, plane undameged by the same force it supposedly delivered.
@MarquezDamas This basis for your case has given u such a strong foothold on the fact a plane was involved that u dont even realize who was behind the whole thing..
You're a living breathing false flag.... You have no credible reason to call people fucktards, since you buy into "facts" that just dont make sense physically...
3. There is live reporter video I saw recently you can see the fucking engine of the 767 in the fucking street with 1000s of people around it. You think it would be part of their sophisticated plan to plant the engine there before the event? Fuck you are a moron.
4. You are a fucking moron and its obvious this NO PLANER shit is pushed by funders because they have the highest qual production videos.
3A. Oh! And to CORRELATE with the engin block found in the street you can see the fucking engine flying out of the tower on its way down there where it landed. I suppose they faked that too! bwhahahahahahahah!.
@KombiPode The engine block that did not keep momentum tumbling down the road or leave a crater? The engine block that sat on the corner in the same place (6 feet off the corner cut under scaffolding with yellow tape) All shown pieces of evidence fitting a planted pattern. We see the landing gear all laying next to a patterned bent sign or downed lightpost, just like the block. The object that flew trough accelerated, was white hot on fire, and did not tumble, not the engine block.
@Kombi You have NO physical evidence that would or could stand in a court of law when closely inspected for details. You are a theorist, you cannot verify through observable evidence that does not conflict nor does the physical evidence back anything you say. Go run and slam your face into a tree or a wall, learn the reality of opposite force reactions. You can observe, feel, and test it. The faster you go the greater the force delivered to your face and the tree equally, in opposite
5. They would have to fake errant planes on NORAD and fake all the suspicious activities of NORAD before and after the events which looks like there was a deliberate stand-down.
Listen you king of FUCKING MORONS it is 1000 times easier to use real Douv Zakheim fitted 767 Boeings. Oh and what a fucking coincidence you can see Douv's pod on the underbelly AND its a fucking 767. Go watch 911MissingLinks you dick.
@Kombi The laws of motion say you are wrong. They have not been disproven in 400 years by people smarter than you, we already know how to test all that bullshit you are saying. Start there. Since Isaac Newton, the same person you use to verify the buildings were demolished, says the collisions without equal opposite force on the plane is impossible ... you are either real stupid and near sighted or are what you are calling others. Force delivered = velocity or mass loss on impact?
the only thing i have a problem with this is in 2001 digital cameras were shit and would change images and had horrible zoom and were not able to make clear images when i t can to fast moving objects and thin lines like the wires on the crane
So the plane flew by the building and then cloaked itself? Perhaps. Then upon flying by the bomb went off? Also how come the building collapsed -I heard it shouldn't have... it should have just dropped a few floors down in places. Also the metal itself seems to have disintegrated and only a few melted beams were shown.
I think it is interesting, that the plant in the foreground hides the possible apearreance of the planes nose (as we know from other footage) in exact the right moment.
9/11 was an inside job for about 70 reasons, 1 reason alone can be considered coincidence, 2 is suspicious, 3 is? inside job, 4 is a blatant inside job, but 70??? conspiracies happen, this was one of them, mass murder for personal gain! Oil, opium and bases in the middle east, better to take from the weak before other superpowers (russia, china) do! We may benefit in the long run when we fill up our cars, but it doesn't make 9.11 ok! Mass murder! the shills will attack me but i don't care!
I have never seen the following anywhere! Flight numbers:
11, flight 93=12, flight 175=13, flight 77= 14..coincidence? Nope strategic planning but, I suspect now not from the ones they blamed for this tragedy. Any flight would have served their "supposed" purpose that day. 9/11 was a brilliant way to unite Americans together so as to plant ourself strategically in the middle east where our life blood drains. Bush allowed only one flight that day after grounding..guess who that was?
Iran Contra, this is one of your best. I subscribe not too long ago and this one tops them all. The whole thing that they are trying to hide is in the first 3 secs. of this video. It's the plane exiting the building undamaged. They have two problems with this:
1) Planes do not go through such a building and if they do they would be heavy damaged.
2) There is no hole on the other side. There are plenty of still pictures of the "exit side" that show absolutely no hole.
@zenoist2 this doesn't cut out. A few do. I doubt you could hold your cam properly when you see a plane hitting a tower out of a sudden.
There's a collection of over 100 amateur tapes (watch?v=tf42FgR0Iqw). ALL FAKE? They all show the same from different angles. Sort your facts!
Claiming the planes being fake makes it just easier for the media to punish all critics down as "mad conspiracy weirdos". I've seen a forum thread where people even analysed footage for the jumpers being fake...
@MG30001 No planes were recovered, the videos have their issues. The news that convinced you was a pooled feed from one source, whatever channel you watched. The decent rates and angles, the parabolic and banked turn vs the level or straight decent rates, and the heading. The facts are being sorted, they have been bullshitted. The laws of motion have some scientifically observable issues with this plane crash. There were four plane crashes in one unified event, no planes recovered.
@MG30001 The jumpers are used for psychological effect and focused on as a protective diversion. Whenever there is a video on YT that has verifiable observable evidence that is hard to refute, a troll will make a jumper comment or some plane comment. Pure bullshit diversion, the desired effect becomes obvious in the patterns. Focusing on people jumping from burning buildings, as your thing, is rude and sadistic. It was hyped on the news, to talk about rather than all the explosions and flaws.
[noobs put code in google!] only video on here that PROVES the calls were fake, prof dewdeny from canada did the tests! {this is pt 2, pt one shows the voice tech used}
God Bess you for being the last of a dying breed: A TRUE AMERICAN!
COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert, and often illegal[2], projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic political organizations.
COINTELPRO tactics included discrediting targets through psychological warfare, planting false reports in the media, smearing through forged letters, harassment, wrongful imprisonment, and extralegal violence !!
yes indeed wing tips at speed and loaded are looking to tear off the main frame of the machine, partic in dense atmosphere - the outside birdcage of either WTC tower more than enough to send these wings down and into the road upon impact, whatver the penetration attained by the fuselage - which should likewise have been slight
@steady What passengers? The ones missing from the Social Security Death Record, that did not collect the victims compensation? Which families are you talking about? Alice Hoaglan is an actor. Two hijacked planes landed in Cleveland out o the NASA runway. There are no victims families for the people on the planes. The news reported eight hijacked planes, even four in the air after the first four were identified, which planes were those and where are those people? No planes recovered at WTC
There were 8 "Unidenified Planes" that day. That doesnt mean that they were hijacked, and what did you say? the MEDIA told you that. Dont believe them all the time.
You know why no planes were recover at the WTC? Because when a 400+mph plane hits a concrete structure, It doesnt stay in one piece ;) and when little pieces of flamble siding go in flames, what happens? Make connections
See: "totally fake but you would still believe it" also on YT. An aluminum plane cannot disappear into a steel structure. FACT - serial stamped parts are used to confirm aircraft ID's in the event of a crash. Also, comm. flights use 'envelopes', one is left on the ground, one is taken on the plane, & contain all flight info, # of passnegers, door lock & gate departure times, etc. All FOIA requests for this info. have been DENIED. Last, did AA77 & UA93 vaporize as we were told??
@CRschralper It didnt "dissapear" in the bulding, It went through the floors, and as you can see Exploded.(That right grammer? Sounds wrong) Those crashs are meant in case they hit the land or water, not a freaking steel building.
And if you didnt know, that is the airports job to tell people, unless the government conducts an investigation, then EVIDENCE cannot be randomly told to people.
The first 3rd of the plane DISAPPEARED into the building, not until the wings entered was there any sign of damage occuring. As for UA93, that one "allegedly" crashed into the ground...helloooooo. Not only was there no plane debris, there was a second debris site that has yet to be explained, what debris was found or how it got there. And whatever debris was claimed to have been found, not ONE serial stamped part has been produced.
@CRschralper Your looking at this wrong for the first. If you look at other angles, It clearly goes into the building, causeing damage. Nothing is instant ;)
Second, lots of debris was everywhere, accualy look at the pictures from people who were there, Lots of debris. Plus, lots of it (when falling at over the speed of sound because of the downward direction) "exploded" and went in different directions
You mean I'm looking at it with my own two eyes & using common sense. Again, the video "totally fake but you would still believe it" shows frame by frame of the alleged 175's impact. There is not a single ounce of damage, not a ripple until the wings enter, which were cantelevered of course and should have snapped off like breadsticks. The nose of a plane is aluminum and the most fragile part, it should have crumpled like a tin can, instead it went THROUGH the steel beams
@CRschralper 1) An object going 400+mph is going to cause damage. And as you second comment said the nose of the plane wont go through steel, backing up the first meaning the major damage was from the wings, thats the reason for no "ripple"
2) That plane weighs 200 tons. 200Tons of anything going 400+mph is going to cause damage.
If you dont remember the plane that hit the empire state building? Smaller hole than the wingspan and that was only 20ft plane that went through steel
@x30xSabresFan You are thinking unidirectinally and only relative to the building. Whatever force you think the plane delivered it would have to recieve exactly the same force it delivered. That opposing force and the energy used means velocity loss. The wings are weak, hollow, and detachable. The building is denser and stronger. No wings came off in FOUR plane crashes? An object going that 400MPH that weighs 200 tons will recieve the same force it delivers opposite, equal in time and quantity.
@Sabre There was no IMPACT. Punching a hole in a building and truncating (or vanishing into dust) an airplane costs energy. Energy that would come from velocity. As the energy is expended we should see the velocity expended. The wings are detachable, cantalevered, hollow, and weaker than the building, which has to hit them with EQUAL force delivered. All collisions have an EQUAL and OPPOSITE collinear force pair. It is scientific LAW, never disproven in 400 years. Proof it, you cant.
@Sabre 8 unidentified hijacked planes according to the live news feed. I have many such videos archived. If the media cannot be trusted, what makes you such a believer in an impossible caveman theory?
You have more fingers and toes than pieces of airplane recovered from TWO large Boeing airplanes. How many parts are in a Boeing? How many pieces should we expect to find from 600 tons of plane?
It stayed in one piece as it passed through a steel facade, there was no opposite force reaction
@steady2wheels Well, that can be very possible. Its rumored that they've invented the "terrorists" identities. Why not about the passengers and everybody? Who knows?
That is the first obvious question so if you haven't seen it, check out "letsrollforums" which has some amazing research on the specific identities of the passengers. First off, all for planes were less than 30% full on average...not likely for even one transcontinental flight much less four on the same day. As for ID's, many happened to be high ranking military & over 20% were millionaires. The odds of these cases occuring together are trillions to one. TRUTH is liberating.
Killer game. Letters, numbers, and lifetimes. Devil? Criminals?World War 1. War 2 . War 3 . Armageddon. Nuclear holocaust. Two New York towers. A tower of Milan. Two Roman towers two donkeys. Iasi, T1 T2 T3. T= baptism. Who stole the two letter T Audi to die crushed.04.04.2009 online journal. 06.04.2009 genocidio Aquila 2: 32. 307 dead. The Eagle was sent to steal two T? Mutilation of roller. RomaN,Romania,Roma,SeveN,SromaN,The little Boy Anton Cristian h t t p genocidio.altervista. org
If this was fake to you that it probably is the concept version for the evil conspirators to see how it would look like. Because in hundred of other images and videos released that were taken from various places there are no such anomalies.
You make some grat points Iran... Theres nothing we can do about whats coming though. The power brokers of the world have all the peices in place. You can join em or die. I choose the latter.
Over 1600 Architects and Engineers from "AE911Truth" have scientific evidence 9-11 was an inside job. They are backed by US senators and former presidential candidate Mike Gravel as well as the former director of Ronald Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative, amongs others.
Its about time people realise this and start listening to them.
@TheHalotoast They have used fakery for many major events, to use as propaganda. the footage is fake. Plain and simple. There is absolutely no explanation for the anomalies, beside it being CGI. Why? It's a lot easier. Have you ever seen is, essentially, a flying beer can (aluminum plane), fly into a steel structure, and cut straight through it, leaving a perfect Wile E. Cyote styled hole? C'mon, review the footages and if you have eyes and common sense, it will only be lead to one conclusion
People who believe no my govt wouldn't do that!?, have no idea and never will because Americans are lazy and believe what they see on tv. Do your research and you'll find the truth. 911 was an inside job no doubt.
@TheShocker316 I do agree with you on that. past history has showed the government obviously lies and does things that are a bit skewered and shocking in a way and people should know that BUT I was right there that day and I can not say for an instant those were magic planes or CGI planes or whatever. That's all. opinions differ.
Video says "yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence found" What? I saw an airline wheel on the street with my own eyes. There's tons of pictures of hard evidence at all sites. Jesus, this is the most insane claim I've ever seen.
@holybulz27 That was all that was found .... the pieces you saw on TV. Thats it. How many pieces and parts are in TWO Boeings? You are missing TWO planes. Tons? Try 1 ton.
@AnkhorDraven Shut up, obviously you have no idea of case study, the facts, and the laws of motion. You arwe 100% fairy tale story without evidence to back anything you spray.
@AnkhorDraven IDIOT!!! If you believe that 71 tons of aircraft can just disintegrate into nothingness you should be put in a mental institute. Rubish, absolute rubish.
@IranContraScumDid911 I saw it on TV??? READ. I saw it on the street in person "with my own eyes"! Among other things. Believe what you want. Yes the goverment shipped in aircraft wheels, parts and metal and threw them around the streets while we held our hands over our eyes until they said open. This is so ridiculous.
@holybulz27 Not evidence enough, you are missing 600 tons of debris. There is a world of liars, thats not scientific. I dont care if you claim to have seen 1 part, which I highly suspect you are lying about in the first place. I have all the pictures and videos of the pieces in the street. I have the equipment maps. I have the Kerik Giuliani daily reports of the recovery effort at the site. The video you saw on TV was all pooled feed from a single source already prepared before the event began.
@holybulz27 So you saw an airline wheel on the street seconds after the event but you didn't see a plane crash into the wtc? I thought David Ray Griffin had claimed those plane parts were planted because they didn't match the alleged aircraft.
- there are two sets of planes....the ones with real people on are being hijacked, led out to sea and then destroyed. Next there are remote controlled planes on a computer programmed course to hit their targets in NY. Then there is the guided missiles that do the damage on the Pentagon and fly over Shanksville.
This is why there was so much confusion. The FA saw the planes heading out to sea and were told to withdraw. These targets were then disguised as NORAD manoeuvres
I just wanted to say to all those people who can't stand but get into argument over 9/11. Why can't you people just respect your different beliefs and move on past this. I believe 9/11 wasn't a conspiracy but i'm not gonna go screaming all over youtube why i'm right and your wrong. Nobody will ever know what really happened that day so stop screaming your point of view of why your right and i'm wrong cause this arguining and cursing people out has driven me over the bend
At 1:22 the plane appears to fly between the body of the crane and its wires. This has to be the funny fudged piece of 911 fakery, I have seen today. I heard the perps paid $1000 for every fake video composited of a plane & the WTC towers. The money was stolen from U.S. taxpayers.
Putting a tree leave in front of a camera is a trick to obscure what is being recorded. Why is that crane and that tree branch in the shot. Someone staged this shot or maybe it was just a composited video.
Brilliant description. Basic physics. An aluminum hollow tube cannot punch its way through steel columns and concrete. There is not enough kinetic energy in a 767 to cripple the world trade center buildings 1 and 2. Even if you fully loaded the 767 with fuel, you don't get enough energy. The collapse of these buildings violates the first law of thermodynamics. Energy cannot be created or destroyed. The energy needed to bring the building down had to come from somewhere else.
@Daddyo930 Could it be 100 million pounds of weight in one,and 200 million in tower 2. It's called gravity. Dummy. Funny how gravity works in the same direction every time huh?
@MrSavagerocks Gravity works the same way every time. So do the laws of motion. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The only way the building could have fallen in that short amount of time is if resistance below was removed. It takes 480,000 pounds of force to break 1 bolt holding a joint together. You would need over 120,000,000 pounds of force per second to simulate the collapse which is why NIST didn't include any of their test except the computer sim of the collapse.
Does anyone notice at 0:40 the entire nose & cockpit section of the plane appears to emerge from the other side of the tower completely intact? YEAH, RIGHT. Those planes are far too fragile to pierce through all that steel & concrete & come out of the other side intact like that. Then at 0:41, the leaf on the tree branch just happens to move & blocks the view of the emerging, intact flight 175. What a coincidence.Check out "911 plane was staged for tv" The government severly fucked up.
@ManardGCrebs No Your rhetoric ! The facts man the facts. You got it all jumbled up. WE DO NOT BLAME AMERICAN Citizens. WE blame a higher source. And you know who that source is. Look at some " senator Ron Paul " videos on his attitude of why we are terrorized.It is because the US government occupies other countries that do not want us there. So even if the terrorist were real "Ron Paul " is blaming US military policies abroad. don't take my word for it watch his videos .
@Jamiep84 GIVE IT UP!!!!!!!! NOT C G I??? are you fucking kidding me!!!???? shanksville- hole , no plane pentagon- hole, no plane see a pattern here???? NO FUCKING PLANES!!! the CGI disasters they aired already look worse than the gorilla in the FIRST king kong movie... easily detected by the naked eye alone... show 'em to an airline pilot... he'll think you just whipped 'em up with an i phone app!!!! ALUMINUM VS. STEEL AND CONCRETE.... NO CONTEST! except on 911! more than once!! ridiculous!
@Jamiep84 you are completely and totally wrong about planes hitting the towers,,,,,it definitely was some other vehicle,,,,,,,,but through military mind control methods and the media,,,,,,,we were lead to believe that it was large commercial jets hijacked by 19 brown guys with boxcutters that somehow beat the entire us defence systems being directed by a man in a cave in afghanistan,,,,hahaha,,,,,,,,what a fuckin bullshit official story we have,,,,,hope they don't teach that story to children
You are looking at how the compressing algorithm stores video. It deliberately identifies moving objects so that they can just be translated along frames, instead of producing each frame from scratch. I believe 911 was an inside job with fair certainty, less certainty that the planes were the ones highjacked, but I still have not seen a strong reason to believe that there wasn't planes in first place.
4711im .is a camel jockey terrorist. One video proves it all right. Im with you on the whole there's more to 911 attacks then just sand niggs flying planes into buildings. If you and all these other people know soooo much about it, then go public. Sitting on youtube identify gonna get justice for anyone.
It's confusing: Black smoke, a crane, no helicopters, no birds. Every 911 video is different. Sometimes Helis, sometimes birds, but no crane, this is the first. Smoke is often gray with white small smoke piles, and sometimes black as night. Background is yellow, blue, white, gray, milky or clear, dark. The plane dives, is straight or turns right before the crash depending on the video.... should the same scene not showing the same elements?
• 9/11 was a very serious crime & it has changed the world. WE must find out who were responsible for all American victims of 9/11and those victims killed abroad. Then punish them accordingly. A fully independent 9/11 commission should be set up to reinvestigate this unresolved complicated vicious crime because it has too many questions unanswered. This horrified tragic event should never & would never go away until we find the whole truth.
@SuperYesyesyo Its the compression used in the video. In this case, the compression eliminates some frames to reduce space, converting a frame to the next frame using the same color.
I have to agree with you 100%, it is actually about resources such as oil amongst other things. I actually work for a major U.S. oil company, I know that's what they are doing.
Die USA sind das einzige Land auf der Welt, wo Alu-Flugzeuge durch Stahlhochhäuser fliegen..................warum schießen US-Panzer nicht mit Alu-Panzersprenggranaten?
Lösung: Weil nur das härtere Material das weichere Material durchdringen kann .........auch in den USA kann man Naturgesetze nicht umkehren.
Eine der vielen Lügen der Medien und der Auftraggeber des 11.9..................es wird Zeit, daß die Welt von den USA eine unabhängige Untersuchung über den tatsächlichen Vorgang fordert.
i just dont get it...still....all the "offical videos" are so crappy reso that u can only imagine whats happening..but the various persons videos are close to hq...and in those videos all the plane crashes are edited out or without it....
@Jamiep84 The plane changes shape, size, and framerate in key areas, not because it is compressed video but because it is a fake that was unreleased to the public. As far as what people saw, that is the least factual of evidence that can be presented. I can tell you for a fact this plane crash in this video defys the laws of motion fort a Boeing. The hollow lighter weaker detachable cantalevered wings did more damage to a denser stronger object than they recieved. Not a force-pair collision
@IranContraScumDid911 Understanding physics FAIL. Planes were REAL. This is reality, you watched too much movies. You are a disinformation tool. I bet you are PAID to do this.
9/11 was an inside Job, as was 7/7 UK....RIP all who lost their lives just so Governments could make more laws to control us, on behalf of the Rothschilds. Wake up people, they ( the Roth's) are the ones who keep UA ALL POOR!, control the military, the UN, the IMF, the EU, etc etc etc....They control it all....only cos we let them, simply cos we didnt know...now we do...its time to wake up folks!
@IranContraScumDid911: why would you need the name if a family member died then thats proof that it was a real plane and that you are a fucking Disrespectful prick
@WorldTributeVideos Asking for facts and confirmation is disrespectful? Come back in a week, watch that person will not answer a simple question. The reason they wont answer is because they are lying. I get this crap all the time. I have NEVER had a person confirm their claims. The ones that tried, I was able to prove they were lying. I have thousands of 9/11 videos and have been doing this for years. I had a girl tell yesterday me her dad was killed, and she deleted her account when caught
@lolykebrtwv You should get in touch with the "September Clues" people, they would LOVE to hear from a relative of one of the victims. They are having trouble finding any.
@lolykebrtwv im sorry for your loss but you do realize the gov't has the power to do watever they want? they can say what they want and the people eat it up. for all you know the actual planes could have been shot down.
@lolykebrtwv I think your family member landed in Cleveland and what happened to those passengers? Who knows? Did they were as government agents or were they murdered?
Al - Qaeda mad on Ahmadinejad spreading conspiracy theories about what happened in 9-11...
in Statement, issued by Al - Qaeda
Ahmadinejad called by Al - Qaeda members to stop and completely contrary to speculate what really happened in the events of September 11. It also called him to avoid going out statements "preposterous," according to a report published online at ABC. "Why did Iran get into such a ridiculous conclusion goes against all logic and evidence?" The statement reads.
Another fake video! Proof of fake: The tree gets in the foreground exactly during the "nose out" situation. The plane was digitally integrated in the picture but the creators let it fly too long, so the nose got out of the tower without damage which is definitely impossible under real circumstances. Therefore the tree is in the foreground to hide the "nose out" situation.
this is another fake published by american media. how it's possible that alluminium devastating steel and the muse of the plane exit from the otherside of the building?!??! and 110floor building collapse in 8 seconds?!?!?! ahahahah amazing!!!
In WHOLE History there are just FEW Questions left to be answered. But it is shocking that in 21 Century in BIGGEST CITY during DAY time, TWO BIGGEST buildings FALLING in LESS than 60 Minutes & still there is no ARREST ORDERS against CRIMINALS.
THEY fabricated many stories to OBSTRUCT THE JUSTICE like two other planes, ANTHRAX, Islam, terrorism & TWO OPPRESSIVE WARS against WEAKEST Arm Forces & FOR 10 Years searched for A VITAL WITNESS-Ben Laden BUT OBAMA Killed HIM!
@space Proof it with the laws of motion .... did the denser heavier stronger building hit the hollow light weaker detachable cantalevered wings with the EXACT same quantity of delivered force in the opposite direction? Does crushing and smashing a building cost energy? Would that use of energy be seen in the form of a loss of velocity? Should the plane truncate and smash in a collision with a denser stronger heavier object? I have 100 angles of this crash to study, many conflict with others
"its not fake the plane exploded into the building"...
Herein lies the problem. Clearly, the explosion occurs AFTER the ENTIRE AIRLINER is INSIDE WTC 2. Now tell me, how did the ENTIRE AIRLINER get INSIDE the tower without FIRST CRASHING & EXPLODING AGAINST the outer steel framed wall of WTC 2?
This has been flagged as spam show
Zionist False Flag Operations:1946 Bombing of King David Hotel,Israelis dressed as Arabs 1954 Levone Affair, Israelis blew up American Instillations in Cairo to blame Egypt 1967 USS Liberty attacked by Israelis,34 Americans killed 170 wounded, to blame Egypt 1968 US Embassy attacked by Israeli commandos in Amman, to blame Jordan 1986 Berlin Disco bombing by Israel, to blame Lybia 2001 Israel attacks on 9/11.1st blamed on Palestinians by Mossad Agents Caught on scene. 911 ✡ ✈ ▌▌
NOWARS11 4 days ago
That's about the funniest fake plane I've seen thus far..lol Amazingly we are, once more seeing the nose sticking out. I think it was a missile, The fireball, from this angle shows the characteristics of a classic thermobaric exploosion. Thanks for input on mandatory investigations...G:
wordgeezer 2 weeks ago
sie versuchen auch in diesem video, die rausragende flugzeugnase abzudecken...
gaiagogo888 3 weeks ago
LOL.
RoYalSmith93 1 month ago
schlecht gemacht :)
TheMaximumLP 2 months ago
No Planers are OBVIOUSLY disinformation agency. Their objective is to smother the truth with ludicrousness.
Considering that after the first plane hit, which would likely not be captured by any videos, its obvious that half of new yorkers with a handy cam would be filming the towers as the north tower burnt from the crash - thus many many people would capture NO PLANE hitting the tower. HENCE, no one would ever consider FAKING planes. Why fake a perfect smart bomb anyways? Idiots!
KombiPode 2 months ago
@KombiPode I was thinking the same thing about you. No planes were revcovered at the site and the planes that you saw live that convivced you were from a controlled produced news feed. No "hmmm" flags go up? There were no hijackers, the names made up from FBI and CIA lists and living people, the videos have conflicting issues, there were no planes recovered, the plane story was filled with lies, the plane victims families did not collect the fund, all four planes are one event.
IranContraScumDid911 2 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911
Dont you get it?
1. There is no reason why using real planes is not an excellant idea when you have the Douv Zakheim remote anti-hijack system which has a POD on the underbelly of a 767 used for NASA and which COINCIDENTALLY looks exactly like the pod you see on the underbelly.
2. An incalculable number of neighbours in highrises all around will have their handycams trained on the towers after the first hit...their videos will show no plane....
3.
KombiPode 2 months ago
@KombiPode The wings failed to recieve the same force they delivered at the same instant they delivered it. There is no wake turbulance that comes off the wings of all large jet aircraft that hits the 200 yards of blasted concrete that comes out of the entry hole. The videos are all suspiciosly fake and the source cannot be trusted. Even the amatuer videos came through the FBI and NYPD first. The only way to make a hole from a collision is loss of velocity and mass, we see neither.
IranContraScumDid911 2 months ago
@KombiPode Clearly even the story you are pushing, the underbelly bullshit does not adress the physics issues .... its more diversion and theory for fools that dont understand the basicws to chase after. Run down the rabbit hole looking for a whack a mole, because you dont even have a clue how to test anything you are parroting. Use science, not what Dov or your favorite paid reporter says. Science says you are miserably wrong and keeping the lie alive. This a troll spam attack?
IranContraScumDid911 2 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911
Which part dont you get?
"Hey, but after the first bomb blows the north tower then everyone in new york in all the apartment buildings and offices with views of the towers will have their handycams out and will record the second tower being blown and there will be no plane in their footage. We will be caught red-handed"
The decide, "Dont worry about it. Lets just take the risk"
FUCKING IDIOT!
MarquezDamas 2 months ago
@Marquez What part dont you get shitbrains? The laws of motion, never disproven in 400 years say you are wrong. Want to test it? Punch yourself in the face as hard as you can. You will feel the same force in both your fist and face, equally in opposition. If the energy available to punch a hole in the building is velocity and mass, how did the plane punch a hole without losing velocity or mass instantly? We have scientific benchmarks to test your caveman theory. It fails reality
IranContraScumDid911 2 months ago 4
@IranContraScumDid911
Plane looks like it did what it would do to me. I have looked at this numb nut wankers liek you before. Dont you think that the Mossad's military physicists wouldn't know to make the simulations look consistent with natural laws? Fucking dick.
And like I said, why on earth would they be so insane to have NO PLANES at WTC when you know everyone will be pointing a camera on the second hit? Fuck you are brainwashed. MENTAL BLOCK.
MarquezDamas 2 months ago
@MarquezDamas How about the vans full of israelis that were detained and later released at the request of a dual citizen american politician.. explosives in the vans, ppL dancing at the sight of building smoldering, and they also had cameras trained on the building before the first plane hit, they were just waiting for it to arrive..
boolshmool 3 weeks ago
@IranContraScumDid911
I repeat.
How come they were not worried about all the cameras (commercial and private) which would be trained on the towers after the first plane hit?
How were they not worried that 20 recordings might pop up where you can not see the plane in the footage?
Oh, guess what - There is no such recordings. Funny that huh?
One could never guesshow many impromptu videographers there would be ready after the first plane hit and the tower is burning. FUCK WIT. BRAIN FUCKTARD.
MarquezDamas 2 months ago
@MarquezDamas You repeat the parroted script line but reject the scientific proofs, that tells us everything we need to know about you. There is not one 9/11 video you or I have ever seen that did not come through the FBI or NYPD first .... not one. The video is the easiest evidence to fake, the laws of motion are not so easily fooled. The force to punch a hole is mass and velocity, neither lost when the hole is punched, plane undameged by the same force it supposedly delivered.
IranContraScumDid911 2 months ago
@MarquezDamas This basis for your case has given u such a strong foothold on the fact a plane was involved that u dont even realize who was behind the whole thing..
You're a living breathing false flag.... You have no credible reason to call people fucktards, since you buy into "facts" that just dont make sense physically...
boolshmool 3 weeks ago
@IranContraScumDid911
3. There is live reporter video I saw recently you can see the fucking engine of the 767 in the fucking street with 1000s of people around it. You think it would be part of their sophisticated plan to plant the engine there before the event? Fuck you are a moron.
4. You are a fucking moron and its obvious this NO PLANER shit is pushed by funders because they have the highest qual production videos.
KombiPode 2 months ago
3A. Oh! And to CORRELATE with the engin block found in the street you can see the fucking engine flying out of the tower on its way down there where it landed. I suppose they faked that too! bwhahahahahahahah!.
You guys are COINTELPRO.
KombiPode 2 months ago
@KombiPode The engine block that did not keep momentum tumbling down the road or leave a crater? The engine block that sat on the corner in the same place (6 feet off the corner cut under scaffolding with yellow tape) All shown pieces of evidence fitting a planted pattern. We see the landing gear all laying next to a patterned bent sign or downed lightpost, just like the block. The object that flew trough accelerated, was white hot on fire, and did not tumble, not the engine block.
IranContraScumDid911 2 months ago
@Kombi You have NO physical evidence that would or could stand in a court of law when closely inspected for details. You are a theorist, you cannot verify through observable evidence that does not conflict nor does the physical evidence back anything you say. Go run and slam your face into a tree or a wall, learn the reality of opposite force reactions. You can observe, feel, and test it. The faster you go the greater the force delivered to your face and the tree equally, in opposite
IranContraScumDid911 2 months ago
@KombiPode
5. They would have to fake errant planes on NORAD and fake all the suspicious activities of NORAD before and after the events which looks like there was a deliberate stand-down.
Listen you king of FUCKING MORONS it is 1000 times easier to use real Douv Zakheim fitted 767 Boeings. Oh and what a fucking coincidence you can see Douv's pod on the underbelly AND its a fucking 767. Go watch 911MissingLinks you dick.
KombiPode 2 months ago
@Kombi The laws of motion say you are wrong. They have not been disproven in 400 years by people smarter than you, we already know how to test all that bullshit you are saying. Start there. Since Isaac Newton, the same person you use to verify the buildings were demolished, says the collisions without equal opposite force on the plane is impossible ... you are either real stupid and near sighted or are what you are calling others. Force delivered = velocity or mass loss on impact?
IranContraScumDid911 2 months ago
FAKE its also in 1080p
wertydm 2 months ago
the only thing i have a problem with this is in 2001 digital cameras were shit and would change images and had horrible zoom and were not able to make clear images when i t can to fast moving objects and thin lines like the wires on the crane
GTFF 2 months ago
@GTFF This is shot with an analog camera, the vertical hold lines at the bottom of the screen from a dirty head are a give-away.
IranContraScumDid911 2 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911 yea i saw that but u still had the digital aspect of it, it was recorded on tapes but it was digital video
GTFF 2 months ago
It was on this side of crane cables, oooppss
lk1dare 2 months ago
I don't understand. Are you trying to demonstrate that the aircraft was rotoscoped into the footage?
vendo233 2 months ago
speed of the aircraft probaly took the wing of
9dilo 2 months ago
Wait hold on now I see it looks like it was digitally added perhaps
jetreschau 2 months ago
So the plane flew by the building and then cloaked itself? Perhaps. Then upon flying by the bomb went off? Also how come the building collapsed -I heard it shouldn't have... it should have just dropped a few floors down in places. Also the metal itself seems to have disintegrated and only a few melted beams were shown.
jetreschau 2 months ago
I am NOT going to read all that -Just explain to me what REALLY happened. And don't be confusing.
Oh and Thanks
jetreschau 2 months ago
@jetreschau This video failed to make the cut and was made classified for years. I hope you can see why.
IranContraScumDid911 2 months ago
Fake!!
J3RKBOI 2 months ago
thats not a boing
CYCOBEATZ 2 months ago
I think it is interesting, that the plant in the foreground hides the possible apearreance of the planes nose (as we know from other footage) in exact the right moment.
laninger 3 months ago
Hä!?
Seile hinterm Flugzeug, Kran vorm Flugzeug?!
Außerdem nach dem Kran geht der eine Flügel des Flugzeuges verloren. Einfach weg.
Komisch.
50rene50 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was an inside job for about 70 reasons, 1 reason alone can be considered coincidence, 2 is suspicious, 3 is? inside job, 4 is a blatant inside job, but 70??? conspiracies happen, this was one of them, mass murder for personal gain! Oil, opium and bases in the middle east, better to take from the weak before other superpowers (russia, china) do! We may benefit in the long run when we fill up our cars, but it doesn't make 9.11 ok! Mass murder! the shills will attack me but i don't care!
wellifthemediasaysit 3 months ago
I have never seen the following anywhere! Flight numbers:
11, flight 93=12, flight 175=13, flight 77= 14..coincidence? Nope strategic planning but, I suspect now not from the ones they blamed for this tragedy. Any flight would have served their "supposed" purpose that day. 9/11 was a brilliant way to unite Americans together so as to plant ourself strategically in the middle east where our life blood drains. Bush allowed only one flight that day after grounding..guess who that was?
nwsjnky 3 months ago
I saw two head shots of Abraham Lincoln on the crane..
blinko656 3 months ago
FAKE!!!!
NoOneStopUs 3 months ago
that dark blob flies in front of crane then behind it? impossible!!
wellifthemediasaysit 3 months ago
@wellifthemediasaysit That's due to bad cam quality and pixelation on digitalisation.
MG30001 3 months ago
That freaking anoying branch is definitely fake!
chuckolove 3 months ago
Iran Contra, this is one of your best. I subscribe not too long ago and this one tops them all. The whole thing that they are trying to hide is in the first 3 secs. of this video. It's the plane exiting the building undamaged. They have two problems with this:
1) Planes do not go through such a building and if they do they would be heavy damaged.
2) There is no hole on the other side. There are plenty of still pictures of the "exit side" that show absolutely no hole.
mikavettel 3 months ago
Wat the fuk is this u muppet!!! Its a plane hittin south tower of WTC
WUDJABEABLE 4 months ago
@WUDJABEABLE You were 8 years old and are sock puppeting a magic caveman theory you have been fed on TV and never questioned ... u muppet!!!
IranContraScumDid911 4 months ago 9
There are NO family members of passengers. No interviews. No footage of them waiting for their families at the airports. Nothing.
Psy0psAgent 4 months ago
Does any besides me find a probl;em with the viewpoint?
Youve got all that massive space so you natirally crouch behind a tree and leaf so your view is blocked?
When you could take step to the left or right to get a totally clear view but you just stay there?
This just has to be faked. just like the whole 911 story.
zenoist2 4 months ago
@zenoist2 Looks liek a static outside cam. Use common sense before going mad.
MG30001 3 months ago
@zenoist2 this doesn't cut out. A few do. I doubt you could hold your cam properly when you see a plane hitting a tower out of a sudden.
There's a collection of over 100 amateur tapes (watch?v=tf42FgR0Iqw). ALL FAKE? They all show the same from different angles. Sort your facts!
Claiming the planes being fake makes it just easier for the media to punish all critics down as "mad conspiracy weirdos". I've seen a forum thread where people even analysed footage for the jumpers being fake...
MG30001 3 months ago
@MG30001 No planes were recovered, the videos have their issues. The news that convinced you was a pooled feed from one source, whatever channel you watched. The decent rates and angles, the parabolic and banked turn vs the level or straight decent rates, and the heading. The facts are being sorted, they have been bullshitted. The laws of motion have some scientifically observable issues with this plane crash. There were four plane crashes in one unified event, no planes recovered.
IranContraScumDid911 3 months ago
@MG30001 The jumpers are used for psychological effect and focused on as a protective diversion. Whenever there is a video on YT that has verifiable observable evidence that is hard to refute, a troll will make a jumper comment or some plane comment. Pure bullshit diversion, the desired effect becomes obvious in the patterns. Focusing on people jumping from burning buildings, as your thing, is rude and sadistic. It was hyped on the news, to talk about rather than all the explosions and flaws.
IranContraScumDid911 3 months ago
LOL! this has to win an award for most obvuiously fake tape ever!
Funny how all the important bits are alwayas missing in these tapes isnt it.?
research more and youll know what mean. the crash always cuts out at the crtiical moments etc in EVERY SINGLE CAMERA.
Please dont tell me thats a coincidence.
zenoist2 4 months ago
Comment removed
MG30001 3 months ago
Fotoshop airplane, failed attempt
Arianiuss 4 months ago
lol u r fucking retard cant u see is a missile , the planes r FAKE!
Banano12cr 4 months ago
@Banano12cr are you fucking retarded? Obviously because you can't use proper grammar..
Yamaharider831 4 months ago
I don't see how the slo mo effects are helping
Wutwut1n1 4 months ago
My bad! God Bless!
SprayOClockNews 4 months ago
much love, much respect!
MPG6WURLC7Y
[noobs put code in google!] only video on here that PROVES the calls were fake, prof dewdeny from canada did the tests! {this is pt 2, pt one shows the voice tech used}
God Bess you for being the last of a dying breed: A TRUE AMERICAN!
SprayOClockNews 4 months ago
COINTELPRO (an acronym for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of covert, and often illegal[2], projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic political organizations.
COINTELPRO tactics included discrediting targets through psychological warfare, planting false reports in the media, smearing through forged letters, harassment, wrongful imprisonment, and extralegal violence !!
wellifthemediasaysit 4 months ago
yes indeed wing tips at speed and loaded are looking to tear off the main frame of the machine, partic in dense atmosphere - the outside birdcage of either WTC tower more than enough to send these wings down and into the road upon impact, whatver the penetration attained by the fuselage - which should likewise have been slight
newsmanbluesman 4 months ago
SUPPORT THE SEPT 11TH RESEARCH AND DISCOVERY PROJECT!
IT'S THE ONLY WAY...DO YOU THINK OBAMA IS GOING TO RE-OPEN THE INVESTIGATION?
Sept11Discovery 4 months ago
00:34 shouldn't plane pass behind the cable??
bernuga 4 months ago
if the planes were fake then what about the passengers of those planes and their families i dont get that part?...
steady2wheels 4 months ago
@steady What passengers? The ones missing from the Social Security Death Record, that did not collect the victims compensation? Which families are you talking about? Alice Hoaglan is an actor. Two hijacked planes landed in Cleveland out o the NASA runway. There are no victims families for the people on the planes. The news reported eight hijacked planes, even four in the air after the first four were identified, which planes were those and where are those people? No planes recovered at WTC
IranContraScumDid911 4 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911 Every single thing you just said is a lie.
There were 8 "Unidenified Planes" that day. That doesnt mean that they were hijacked, and what did you say? the MEDIA told you that. Dont believe them all the time.
You know why no planes were recover at the WTC? Because when a 400+mph plane hits a concrete structure, It doesnt stay in one piece ;) and when little pieces of flamble siding go in flames, what happens? Make connections
x30xSabresFan 4 months ago
@x30xSabresFan
See: "totally fake but you would still believe it" also on YT. An aluminum plane cannot disappear into a steel structure. FACT - serial stamped parts are used to confirm aircraft ID's in the event of a crash. Also, comm. flights use 'envelopes', one is left on the ground, one is taken on the plane, & contain all flight info, # of passnegers, door lock & gate departure times, etc. All FOIA requests for this info. have been DENIED. Last, did AA77 & UA93 vaporize as we were told??
CRschralper 4 months ago
@CRschralper It didnt "dissapear" in the bulding, It went through the floors, and as you can see Exploded.(That right grammer? Sounds wrong) Those crashs are meant in case they hit the land or water, not a freaking steel building.
And if you didnt know, that is the airports job to tell people, unless the government conducts an investigation, then EVIDENCE cannot be randomly told to people.
x30xSabresFan 4 months ago
@x30xSabresFan
The first 3rd of the plane DISAPPEARED into the building, not until the wings entered was there any sign of damage occuring. As for UA93, that one "allegedly" crashed into the ground...helloooooo. Not only was there no plane debris, there was a second debris site that has yet to be explained, what debris was found or how it got there. And whatever debris was claimed to have been found, not ONE serial stamped part has been produced.
CRschralper 4 months ago
@CRschralper Your looking at this wrong for the first. If you look at other angles, It clearly goes into the building, causeing damage. Nothing is instant ;)
Second, lots of debris was everywhere, accualy look at the pictures from people who were there, Lots of debris. Plus, lots of it (when falling at over the speed of sound because of the downward direction) "exploded" and went in different directions
x30xSabresFan 4 months ago
@x30xSabresFan
You mean I'm looking at it with my own two eyes & using common sense. Again, the video "totally fake but you would still believe it" shows frame by frame of the alleged 175's impact. There is not a single ounce of damage, not a ripple until the wings enter, which were cantelevered of course and should have snapped off like breadsticks. The nose of a plane is aluminum and the most fragile part, it should have crumpled like a tin can, instead it went THROUGH the steel beams
CRschralper 4 months ago
@CRschralper 1) An object going 400+mph is going to cause damage. And as you second comment said the nose of the plane wont go through steel, backing up the first meaning the major damage was from the wings, thats the reason for no "ripple"
2) That plane weighs 200 tons. 200Tons of anything going 400+mph is going to cause damage.
If you dont remember the plane that hit the empire state building? Smaller hole than the wingspan and that was only 20ft plane that went through steel
x30xSabresFan 4 months ago
@x30xSabresFan You are thinking unidirectinally and only relative to the building. Whatever force you think the plane delivered it would have to recieve exactly the same force it delivered. That opposing force and the energy used means velocity loss. The wings are weak, hollow, and detachable. The building is denser and stronger. No wings came off in FOUR plane crashes? An object going that 400MPH that weighs 200 tons will recieve the same force it delivers opposite, equal in time and quantity.
IranContraScumDid911 4 months ago
@CRschralper He does not understand or believe Isaac Newton was correct. Dont bother, nice points though.
IranContraScumDid911 4 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911
Thanks...and thanks also for all the vids. No number of shills with their disinfo. efforts and thumb up/thumb down games can change the truth.
CRschralper 4 months ago
@Sabre There was no IMPACT. Punching a hole in a building and truncating (or vanishing into dust) an airplane costs energy. Energy that would come from velocity. As the energy is expended we should see the velocity expended. The wings are detachable, cantalevered, hollow, and weaker than the building, which has to hit them with EQUAL force delivered. All collisions have an EQUAL and OPPOSITE collinear force pair. It is scientific LAW, never disproven in 400 years. Proof it, you cant.
IranContraScumDid911 4 months ago
@Sabre 8 unidentified hijacked planes according to the live news feed. I have many such videos archived. If the media cannot be trusted, what makes you such a believer in an impossible caveman theory?
You have more fingers and toes than pieces of airplane recovered from TWO large Boeing airplanes. How many parts are in a Boeing? How many pieces should we expect to find from 600 tons of plane?
It stayed in one piece as it passed through a steel facade, there was no opposite force reaction
IranContraScumDid911 4 months ago
@steady2wheels Well, that can be very possible. Its rumored that they've invented the "terrorists" identities. Why not about the passengers and everybody? Who knows?
ranieri7x 4 months ago
@steady2wheels
That is the first obvious question so if you haven't seen it, check out "letsrollforums" which has some amazing research on the specific identities of the passengers. First off, all for planes were less than 30% full on average...not likely for even one transcontinental flight much less four on the same day. As for ID's, many happened to be high ranking military & over 20% were millionaires. The odds of these cases occuring together are trillions to one. TRUTH is liberating.
CRschralper 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Killer game. Letters, numbers, and lifetimes. Devil? Criminals?World War 1. War 2 . War 3 . Armageddon. Nuclear holocaust. Two New York towers. A tower of Milan. Two Roman towers two donkeys. Iasi, T1 T2 T3. T= baptism. Who stole the two letter T Audi to die crushed.04.04.2009 online journal. 06.04.2009 genocidio Aquila 2: 32. 307 dead. The Eagle was sent to steal two T? Mutilation of roller. RomaN,Romania,Roma,SeveN,SromaN,The little Boy Anton Cristian h t t p genocidio.altervista. org
Genocidioaquila 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
'Tuesday Morning in September'. Available on DVD. Runtime 130 minutes.
Pure, unfiltered, authentic. Something new from 9/11/2001; that day.
tusmorninginsept911 4 months ago
That's one terrible pilot.
KingdomAwaits 4 months ago 2
If this was fake to you that it probably is the concept version for the evil conspirators to see how it would look like. Because in hundred of other images and videos released that were taken from various places there are no such anomalies.
commandro 4 months ago
You make some grat points Iran... Theres nothing we can do about whats coming though. The power brokers of the world have all the peices in place. You can join em or die. I choose the latter.
rygarnett 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Over 1600 Architects and Engineers from "AE911Truth" have scientific evidence 9-11 was an inside job. They are backed by US senators and former presidential candidate Mike Gravel as well as the former director of Ronald Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative, amongs others.
Its about time people realise this and start listening to them.
Here is their campaign ad.
watch?v=3XXEMwhizCE
The911watch 4 months ago
@TheHalotoast They have used fakery for many major events, to use as propaganda. the footage is fake. Plain and simple. There is absolutely no explanation for the anomalies, beside it being CGI. Why? It's a lot easier. Have you ever seen is, essentially, a flying beer can (aluminum plane), fly into a steel structure, and cut straight through it, leaving a perfect Wile E. Cyote styled hole? C'mon, review the footages and if you have eyes and common sense, it will only be lead to one conclusion
Synthstrumental 4 months ago
People who believe no my govt wouldn't do that!?, have no idea and never will because Americans are lazy and believe what they see on tv. Do your research and you'll find the truth. 911 was an inside job no doubt.
TheShocker316 4 months ago
@TheShocker316 I do agree with you on that. past history has showed the government obviously lies and does things that are a bit skewered and shocking in a way and people should know that BUT I was right there that day and I can not say for an instant those were magic planes or CGI planes or whatever. That's all. opinions differ.
holybulz27 4 months ago
Video says "yet not one piece of hard aircraft evidence found" What? I saw an airline wheel on the street with my own eyes. There's tons of pictures of hard evidence at all sites. Jesus, this is the most insane claim I've ever seen.
holybulz27 4 months ago 2
@holybulz27 That was all that was found .... the pieces you saw on TV. Thats it. How many pieces and parts are in TWO Boeings? You are missing TWO planes. Tons? Try 1 ton.
IranContraScumDid911 4 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911 Obviously you've never heard of disintegration.
AnkhorDraven 4 months ago
@AnkhorDraven Shut up, obviously you have no idea of case study, the facts, and the laws of motion. You arwe 100% fairy tale story without evidence to back anything you spray.
IranContraScumDid911 4 months ago
@AnkhorDraven IDIOT!!! If you believe that 71 tons of aircraft can just disintegrate into nothingness you should be put in a mental institute. Rubish, absolute rubish.
gdubar61 4 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911 I saw it on TV??? READ. I saw it on the street in person "with my own eyes"! Among other things. Believe what you want. Yes the goverment shipped in aircraft wheels, parts and metal and threw them around the streets while we held our hands over our eyes until they said open. This is so ridiculous.
holybulz27 4 months ago
@holybulz27 Not evidence enough, you are missing 600 tons of debris. There is a world of liars, thats not scientific. I dont care if you claim to have seen 1 part, which I highly suspect you are lying about in the first place. I have all the pictures and videos of the pieces in the street. I have the equipment maps. I have the Kerik Giuliani daily reports of the recovery effort at the site. The video you saw on TV was all pooled feed from a single source already prepared before the event began.
IranContraScumDid911 4 months ago
@holybulz27 So you saw an airline wheel on the street seconds after the event but you didn't see a plane crash into the wtc? I thought David Ray Griffin had claimed those plane parts were planted because they didn't match the alleged aircraft.
Pete19782007 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
- there are two sets of planes....the ones with real people on are being hijacked, led out to sea and then destroyed. Next there are remote controlled planes on a computer programmed course to hit their targets in NY. Then there is the guided missiles that do the damage on the Pentagon and fly over Shanksville.
This is why there was so much confusion. The FA saw the planes heading out to sea and were told to withdraw. These targets were then disguised as NORAD manoeuvres
TyroneSandalphon 4 months ago
i saw another video where a wing seems to disappear when about to hit the building.
Degenerate999 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I just wanted to say to all those people who can't stand but get into argument over 9/11. Why can't you people just respect your different beliefs and move on past this. I believe 9/11 wasn't a conspiracy but i'm not gonna go screaming all over youtube why i'm right and your wrong. Nobody will ever know what really happened that day so stop screaming your point of view of why your right and i'm wrong cause this arguining and cursing people out has driven me over the bend
starsplayer52 4 months ago
At 1:22 the plane appears to fly between the body of the crane and its wires. This has to be the funny fudged piece of 911 fakery, I have seen today. I heard the perps paid $1000 for every fake video composited of a plane & the WTC towers. The money was stolen from U.S. taxpayers.
Putting a tree leave in front of a camera is a trick to obscure what is being recorded. Why is that crane and that tree branch in the shot. Someone staged this shot or maybe it was just a composited video.
074August 4 months ago
Comment removed
074August 4 months ago
Brilliant description. Basic physics. An aluminum hollow tube cannot punch its way through steel columns and concrete. There is not enough kinetic energy in a 767 to cripple the world trade center buildings 1 and 2. Even if you fully loaded the 767 with fuel, you don't get enough energy. The collapse of these buildings violates the first law of thermodynamics. Energy cannot be created or destroyed. The energy needed to bring the building down had to come from somewhere else.
Daddyo930 4 months ago
@Daddyo930 Could it be 100 million pounds of weight in one,and 200 million in tower 2. It's called gravity. Dummy. Funny how gravity works in the same direction every time huh?
MrSavagerocks 4 months ago
@MrSavagerocks Gravity works the same way every time. So do the laws of motion. Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. The only way the building could have fallen in that short amount of time is if resistance below was removed. It takes 480,000 pounds of force to break 1 bolt holding a joint together. You would need over 120,000,000 pounds of force per second to simulate the collapse which is why NIST didn't include any of their test except the computer sim of the collapse.
Daddyo930 4 months ago
Does anyone notice at 0:40 the entire nose & cockpit section of the plane appears to emerge from the other side of the tower completely intact? YEAH, RIGHT. Those planes are far too fragile to pierce through all that steel & concrete & come out of the other side intact like that. Then at 0:41, the leaf on the tree branch just happens to move & blocks the view of the emerging, intact flight 175. What a coincidence.Check out "911 plane was staged for tv" The government severly fucked up.
mooremichael95 4 months ago
get some historical facts about 911
watch?v=sDPtiR4EQ2A
Kostafleer 4 months ago
@ManardGCrebs Read my post above
mindscrape69 4 months ago
@ManardGCrebs No Your rhetoric ! The facts man the facts. You got it all jumbled up. WE DO NOT BLAME AMERICAN Citizens. WE blame a higher source. And you know who that source is. Look at some " senator Ron Paul " videos on his attitude of why we are terrorized.It is because the US government occupies other countries that do not want us there. So even if the terrorist were real "Ron Paul " is blaming US military policies abroad. don't take my word for it watch his videos .
mindscrape69 4 months ago
2Xyousee 4 months ago
@Jamiep84 you are completely and totally wrong about planes hitting the towers,,,,,it definitely was some other vehicle,,,,,,,,but through military mind control methods and the media,,,,,,,we were lead to believe that it was large commercial jets hijacked by 19 brown guys with boxcutters that somehow beat the entire us defence systems being directed by a man in a cave in afghanistan,,,,hahaha,,,,,,,,what a fuckin bullshit official story we have,,,,,hope they don't teach that story to children
bigbopper993 4 months ago
You are looking at how the compressing algorithm stores video. It deliberately identifies moving objects so that they can just be translated along frames, instead of producing each frame from scratch. I believe 911 was an inside job with fair certainty, less certainty that the planes were the ones highjacked, but I still have not seen a strong reason to believe that there wasn't planes in first place.
gininginin 4 months ago
what's the emoticon for rolling your eyes?
VICENTETAGLE 5 months ago
4711im .is a camel jockey terrorist. One video proves it all right. Im with you on the whole there's more to 911 attacks then just sand niggs flying planes into buildings. If you and all these other people know soooo much about it, then go public. Sitting on youtube identify gonna get justice for anyone.
myabbydad 5 months ago
It's confusing: Black smoke, a crane, no helicopters, no birds. Every 911 video is different. Sometimes Helis, sometimes birds, but no crane, this is the first. Smoke is often gray with white small smoke piles, and sometimes black as night. Background is yellow, blue, white, gray, milky or clear, dark. The plane dives, is straight or turns right before the crash depending on the video.... should the same scene not showing the same elements?
TheThore 5 months ago
• 9/11 was a very serious crime & it has changed the world. WE must find out who were responsible for all American victims of 9/11and those victims killed abroad. Then punish them accordingly. A fully independent 9/11 commission should be set up to reinvestigate this unresolved complicated vicious crime because it has too many questions unanswered. This horrified tragic event should never & would never go away until we find the whole truth.
plau0088 5 months ago
Why is the plane at 0:15 flying in front of the cable from the crane but dissapears behind the crane?
SuperYesyesyo 5 months ago 6
@SuperYesyesyo Its the compression used in the video. In this case, the compression eliminates some frames to reduce space, converting a frame to the next frame using the same color.
CarlosBcn1989 5 months ago
@SuperYesyesyo If you cant tell by this crappy job of this fake video, there is a box around the plane when it crosses the cable.
If you pause the video, copy that pic, pause it when it hits the cable, you can make it look as though it goes "infront" of the cable.
This is just a bad way of faking a video
x30xSabresFan 4 months ago
@SuperYesyesyo Yep, I see it too!
GloriaD5767 4 months ago
@sierracuban
I have to agree with you 100%, it is actually about resources such as oil amongst other things. I actually work for a major U.S. oil company, I know that's what they are doing.
BoltAPureSource 5 months ago
Die USA sind das einzige Land auf der Welt, wo Alu-Flugzeuge durch Stahlhochhäuser fliegen..................warum schießen US-Panzer nicht mit Alu-Panzersprenggranaten?
Lösung: Weil nur das härtere Material das weichere Material durchdringen kann .........auch in den USA kann man Naturgesetze nicht umkehren.
Eine der vielen Lügen der Medien und der Auftraggeber des 11.9..................es wird Zeit, daß die Welt von den USA eine unabhängige Untersuchung über den tatsächlichen Vorgang fordert.
4711im 5 months ago
That's not a crane!!! That's a terrorist!!!
slowakiewicz01 5 months ago
da kann man doch ganz gut erkennen das es KEIN FLUGZEUG IST.
Schaut mal genau hin bei 0:16 da ist doch das karbel vom kran und das flugzeug fliegt VOR dem karbel und danach hinter dem kran. VOLL DER FAKE
taubeibei 5 months ago
Interesting -- when hundreds of people see a UFO, its not credible; hundreds see planes hiting buildings (or not) and it is now irrefutable...
noponat666 5 months ago
i just dont get it...still....all the "offical videos" are so crappy reso that u can only imagine whats happening..but the various persons videos are close to hq...and in those videos all the plane crashes are edited out or without it....
EvilKnievel1980 5 months ago
Is that the right color? What color was the alleged jet that crashed?
onesnarkybrit 5 months ago
@Jamiep84 The plane changes shape, size, and framerate in key areas, not because it is compressed video but because it is a fake that was unreleased to the public. As far as what people saw, that is the least factual of evidence that can be presented. I can tell you for a fact this plane crash in this video defys the laws of motion fort a Boeing. The hollow lighter weaker detachable cantalevered wings did more damage to a denser stronger object than they recieved. Not a force-pair collision
IranContraScumDid911 5 months ago 6
Comment removed
SuperYesyesyo 5 months ago
Comment removed
drumguyrobc 4 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911 Understanding physics FAIL. Planes were REAL. This is reality, you watched too much movies. You are a disinformation tool. I bet you are PAID to do this.
KillTheBanksters 4 months ago
Comment removed
Jamiep84 5 months ago
thumbs up if you see 2 or 3 faces on that crane at 0:57
Huforlife66 5 months ago 2
GET OUTTA THE WAY YOU STUPID LEAF!
michaelm0522 5 months ago
9/11 was an inside Job, as was 7/7 UK....RIP all who lost their lives just so Governments could make more laws to control us, on behalf of the Rothschilds. Wake up people, they ( the Roth's) are the ones who keep UA ALL POOR!, control the military, the UN, the IMF, the EU, etc etc etc....They control it all....only cos we let them, simply cos we didnt know...now we do...its time to wake up folks!
theyarelying2u 5 months ago 4
How come one of my family members died on that very same flight????????? tell me that FAG!
lolykebrtwv 5 months ago
@lolykebrtwv What is their name?
IranContraScumDid911 5 months ago
@IranContraScumDid911: why would you need the name if a family member died then thats proof that it was a real plane and that you are a fucking Disrespectful prick
WorldTributeVideos 5 months ago
@WorldTributeVideos Asking for facts and confirmation is disrespectful? Come back in a week, watch that person will not answer a simple question. The reason they wont answer is because they are lying. I get this crap all the time. I have NEVER had a person confirm their claims. The ones that tried, I was able to prove they were lying. I have thousands of 9/11 videos and have been doing this for years. I had a girl tell yesterday me her dad was killed, and she deleted her account when caught
IranContraScumDid911 5 months ago
@lolykebrtwv You should get in touch with the "September Clues" people, they would LOVE to hear from a relative of one of the victims. They are having trouble finding any.
CokeSupply 5 months ago
@lolykebrtwv im sorry for your loss but you do realize the gov't has the power to do watever they want? they can say what they want and the people eat it up. for all you know the actual planes could have been shot down.
evanatromitoszarsaz 5 months ago
@lolykebrtwv I think your family member landed in Cleveland and what happened to those passengers? Who knows? Did they were as government agents or were they murdered?
WTC7seven 5 months ago
FUCK YOU BUSH
lolitatomata 5 months ago 9
This has been flagged as spam show
Al - Qaeda mad on Ahmadinejad spreading conspiracy theories about what happened in 9-11...
in Statement, issued by Al - Qaeda
Ahmadinejad called by Al - Qaeda members to stop and completely contrary to speculate what really happened in the events of September 11. It also called him to avoid going out statements "preposterous," according to a report published online at ABC. "Why did Iran get into such a ridiculous conclusion goes against all logic and evidence?" The statement reads.
creatingfl 5 months ago
The blatent, sloppy video fakery is why NIST never let this see the light of day.
Daddyo930 5 months ago
The "Branch" of government covered it up
iJarritos 5 months ago 3
look at the wing it dissapears like in other vids
ludacrisjr7 5 months ago
That one is too obvious to be showed.
It's insulting to see the videos that where, it's still (the fake) putty much obvious.
They did botter to do a good job at it, because they think american public is dumb.
And they have been proven RIGHT !
MrPierrePhilippe 5 months ago
@claudiabutlerxo What's your point? People died so it doesn't really matter what happened?
bweazel 5 months ago
I like how the plane goes in front of the wire ;)
bweazel 5 months ago
Comment removed
StarryKid06 5 months ago
Another fake video! Proof of fake: The tree gets in the foreground exactly during the "nose out" situation. The plane was digitally integrated in the picture but the creators let it fly too long, so the nose got out of the tower without damage which is definitely impossible under real circumstances. Therefore the tree is in the foreground to hide the "nose out" situation.
tulua11 5 months ago
this is another fake published by american media. how it's possible that alluminium devastating steel and the muse of the plane exit from the otherside of the building?!??! and 110floor building collapse in 8 seconds?!?!?! ahahahah amazing!!!
AIKRON82 5 months ago
In WHOLE History there are just FEW Questions left to be answered. But it is shocking that in 21 Century in BIGGEST CITY during DAY time, TWO BIGGEST buildings FALLING in LESS than 60 Minutes & still there is no ARREST ORDERS against CRIMINALS.
THEY fabricated many stories to OBSTRUCT THE JUSTICE like two other planes, ANTHRAX, Islam, terrorism & TWO OPPRESSIVE WARS against WEAKEST Arm Forces & FOR 10 Years searched for A VITAL WITNESS-Ben Laden BUT OBAMA Killed HIM!
Major Keyvan Nourhaghighi
bbbooobbbzz 5 months ago
FBI probably didn't show it, because of the fact there's foliage in the fucking way
GraphicSparrow 5 months ago
@GraphicSparrow The entire thing is fake, bro.
bweazel 5 months ago
0:22 obviously fake
squrillicker101 5 months ago
@squrillicker101 its not fake the plane exploded into the building
spacepatrolman 5 months ago
@space Proof it with the laws of motion .... did the denser heavier stronger building hit the hollow light weaker detachable cantalevered wings with the EXACT same quantity of delivered force in the opposite direction? Does crushing and smashing a building cost energy? Would that use of energy be seen in the form of a loss of velocity? Should the plane truncate and smash in a collision with a denser stronger heavier object? I have 100 angles of this crash to study, many conflict with others
IranContraScumDid911 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@spacepatrolman
"its not fake the plane exploded into the building"...
Herein lies the problem. Clearly, the explosion occurs AFTER the ENTIRE AIRLINER is INSIDE WTC 2. Now tell me, how did the ENTIRE AIRLINER get INSIDE the tower without FIRST CRASHING & EXPLODING AGAINST the outer steel framed wall of WTC 2?
lmfecher 5 months ago
where is the right wing? it vanishes hahaha its fuckin cheap fake!!!
normalsigara 5 months ago
Simple explanation. Its,called,video compression!
VisualBlasters 5 months ago