A McLaren só perdia para Wyllyams, ou seja, o único carroa a altura do do Senna era os de Prost e seu compaheiro. Senna foi campão em carro se ponta sempre. Aí qualquer um.
Vc está errado. Em 1991 o melhor carro era a Williams de Nigel Mansell, mas Senna foi campeão. Segurou o inglês no braço, que virou uma ameaça ao título de Senna assim que a Williams parou de quebrar, já que não era um carro muito confiável no início da temporada. E outra: a Benneton em 1993 era melhor que a Mclaren, ou vc viu o companheiro de Senna andar na frente de Benneton e Mclaren nesse ano????? Só o Senna mesmo.
donninton93 was wet, but not as much as barcelona 92, in which schumacher was 2nd, only after super-williams of mansell, while senna crashed! also in spa 92, schumacher gets his first victory, being in the rain much better than super-williams of nigel and ricardo, and of course better than senna. but barcelona 96 was much harder than donninton 93 and spa 92, with much more rain, and schumacher won with no electronic aids like senna had in 93, schumi is the greatest rain master!!
barrichello was good, but not as stunning as Senna. it's quite a difference passing 6cars in midfield (2 positions Bar gained because Andretti/Wendlinger eliminated each other) or pass the leading 4 cars (2 of them had an engine that was 100hp more powerful than Sennas Ford HB5).
Tirana20, you go around youtube posting about how Schumacher is better than Senna under every video? Face it, Schumi always depended on having the best car, cheating while the FIA was too lenient towards him, having a teammate just to hold the others back or let him pass at the last round. And not 1 single time did he win a championship without the help of all those combined. He is very talented but never dared playing fair to prove it.
I'm saying my subjective opinion based on well known facts. Schumi has undeniable talent but it is also undeniable that he got the "star treatment" more than a few times. If I sound retarded stating this simple fact then how do you sound with your fanatic campaign for a meaningless no.1 position, especially when you can't really compare the two eras without tons of assumptions?
schumacher didn't win the race because a)he wasn't good enough and b) beacuse senna is the ultimate wet weather driver no one not even the vastly superior williams could touch senna beacuse his genius in car control is unsurpassable
Forever Ayrton!!!!
RYnMZ 4 months ago
schumacher would have ate senna for breakfast had he not killed himself..fact.
JOHNSTONMARK4 7 months ago
If Aryton Senna didn't die, we probably wouldn't know who Michael Schumacher is.
DyeTyme 10 months ago
One of my favorite moments in motor sport.
snishimura1 1 year ago
A McLaren só perdia para Wyllyams, ou seja, o único carroa a altura do do Senna era os de Prost e seu compaheiro. Senna foi campão em carro se ponta sempre. Aí qualquer um.
bebe777p 2 years ago
Vc está errado. Em 1991 o melhor carro era a Williams de Nigel Mansell, mas Senna foi campeão. Segurou o inglês no braço, que virou uma ameaça ao título de Senna assim que a Williams parou de quebrar, já que não era um carro muito confiável no início da temporada. E outra: a Benneton em 1993 era melhor que a Mclaren, ou vc viu o companheiro de Senna andar na frente de Benneton e Mclaren nesse ano????? Só o Senna mesmo.
TheMazaro 1 year ago
Magic
marcrichiger 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
donninton93 was wet, but not as much as barcelona 92, in which schumacher was 2nd, only after super-williams of mansell, while senna crashed! also in spa 92, schumacher gets his first victory, being in the rain much better than super-williams of nigel and ricardo, and of course better than senna. but barcelona 96 was much harder than donninton 93 and spa 92, with much more rain, and schumacher won with no electronic aids like senna had in 93, schumi is the greatest rain master!!
hunt2727 3 years ago
amazing
hookee 3 years ago
Is that Jonathan Ross commentating? D:
Poddeh 3 years ago
Yes
GolfTheMagicRabbit 3 years ago
Yes, unfortunately it is
AussieDefenceForce 2 years ago
Senna, Mansell, Hill, Prost - legends ! Schumacher - bleah !!!!
brav0wing 3 years ago 5
And Barrichello? He started in 12 and passed 8 cars in first lap!
arthurlevycavalca 3 years ago
Thats 8 slow cars, 4 top cars to go.
darfunkelidas 3 years ago
Comment removed
BluesMan9teen69 2 years ago
barrichello was good, but not as stunning as Senna. it's quite a difference passing 6cars in midfield (2 positions Bar gained because Andretti/Wendlinger eliminated each other) or pass the leading 4 cars (2 of them had an engine that was 100hp more powerful than Sennas Ford HB5).
sargatanas88 2 years ago
senna was the best. if he was around, schumarker would not be such a star today. Shame.
chamikais 4 years ago 4
If he had been around, he'd have been knocked all over the place by Schumacher, like everyone else.
dlmaniac 4 years ago
yeah yeah believe what you will :)
chamikais 4 years ago 2
Love This Track. Love Senna. Love The Video. Love Brazilian's. Love The British Commentary. Great Video. Thanks For Uploading Mate.
JemrelGod 4 years ago
Haha wow never knew he was an F1 man
ScarTissue1990 4 years ago
Awesome is it Johnathon Ross narrating?!
ScarTissue1990 4 years ago
Yes it is Johnathon Ross.
TonyC1968 4 years ago
The Duck! Senna forever!
sakax 5 years ago
brilliant stuff!
bulletburposmiley 5 years ago
Senna IS the master in the WET!
vuetube 5 years ago
Schumacher is the master of the wet. Senna is 2nd best in the wet.
Tirana20 4 years ago
Tirana20, you go around youtube posting about how Schumacher is better than Senna under every video? Face it, Schumi always depended on having the best car, cheating while the FIA was too lenient towards him, having a teammate just to hold the others back or let him pass at the last round. And not 1 single time did he win a championship without the help of all those combined. He is very talented but never dared playing fair to prove it.
M4GuS109 4 years ago
Lol do you realise how retarded you sound saying that?
And Mallamoozoo, and Luiegee and some other dumb people are going around youtube posting shit facts that Senna is better than Schumacher.
Tirana20 4 years ago
I'm saying my subjective opinion based on well known facts. Schumi has undeniable talent but it is also undeniable that he got the "star treatment" more than a few times. If I sound retarded stating this simple fact then how do you sound with your fanatic campaign for a meaningless no.1 position, especially when you can't really compare the two eras without tons of assumptions?
M4GuS109 4 years ago
well said...
ChartStalker 3 years ago
What are you STUPID!!!! Schumacher isn't fit to hold an unbrella over Senna's head nobody is!!!
paulcurran29 4 years ago 5
how come schuey didnt win the race then?
clay111 4 years ago
Schumacher's car didn't have TC. That race was a cheap win for those TC users.
dlmaniac 4 years ago
schumacher didn't win the race because a)he wasn't good enough and b) beacuse senna is the ultimate wet weather driver no one not even the vastly superior williams could touch senna beacuse his genius in car control is unsurpassable
AyrtonSennaGODsPilot 4 years ago 10
Haha. I like Schumacher, but honestly...
1994 Brazilian GP Practice? Who was on the track in "Undrivable" conditions? Senna.
Who won the pole in wet conditions? Senna.
Schumacher is great, but Senna was the best ever.
willski1221 4 years ago 19