Watching these actually make me appreciate my Wii. The colors are better, frame rates are better, and I've never experienced any "frame tearing' before. It may not be HD, but it's the best HQ content out there.
@specterseal999 I own a 360 though I'm with you on this one. Lower graphics are a bummer at start, but you can get used to it. Choppy frame rates are not okay. Constantly interrupting your gameplay, really shits you.
ohhh by a divine miracle, the ps3 version got a little melhor.lembrando that when the game and copied to the hd of the xbox 360's performance is greatly improved, and the lens of truth do not know why it never copies the games for xbox 360 the hard disk, stupid people, like the head to head star wars force unleashed, not copied the game for the xbox 360 hd, in the assessment, and the game runs much better when copied to the hd, with no lag
This is fantastic its always played around christmas time with my uncle he is very good at it. I actually downloaded it perfectly free for my sony ps3 here; one blow (.) com there are literally hundreds and they are all totally free also I must say 0:04 was excellent
i have it on 360 and it runs pretty well most of the time. my only real gripe is that some objects look like CRAP. example, barrels, or a poster on a wall, a sack of wheat, these types of objects can look almost as if they just don't have texture at all. probably due to the amount of content and voice crammed on that dvd. it's a badass game though, and if you like this stuff it's worth picking up for either console really
you can download this playstation 3 game for free. Simply Google "ps3 quick download" - just click the first link. I downloaded it and it's super! There are ton's of ps3 games on the "ps3quickdownload" website!!
The graphics are noticeably better on the PS3, and the frame rates are noticeably better on the 360. Neither are so great when compared to the PC. =/ I agree with RecklessYouth333. How come the console ports are so obviously inferior?
However, the old guy with the beard at 2:20 is awesome in all three versions, I'm sure. lol But his beard looks so different in the PS3 and 360 versions! It doesn't make sense, and it sucks. =?
I guess there is a reason why the PC version was not included in this comparison, as it is clear to everybody that it is the superior version and that it is a bit different in gameplay. This comparision was made to show the difference between the console version.
they should do a triple header comparison, because the PC version shits on both console version in every aspect. From frame rates to graphics, to even gameplay.
They did a comparison on Gamespot, apparently the PS3 version , although running a few frames below the 360 version, has an extra layer of textures and load times are far better, which is why they gave the PS3 version a 9.0 and the 360 an 8.5.
You guys are missing the fact the game has much better texture filtering on PS3. You cant just look at the framerate on this one. Go look at the full comparison on Lens of Truth,
Anybody familiar with my comments knows I'm an extreme 360 fanboy, but I have to admit the PS3 version wins this one.
I really don't understand how they fucked up the console ports so badly. Mass Effect ran fine on the 360, and although the later PC port was superior, at least the console version could stand on its own. This, however, is disgraceful. The console versions feel and look worse in almost every way.
This game must have some really bad coding. The frame rate is pretty shit on both consoles, but particularly PS3. If MW2 can run at 50 - 60 frames then why does this struggle to run at 20?
wtf 15 fps!
musicdrew2341 2 weeks ago
But it also pisses me off that the original Xbox could support 720p, and Wii can't -_-
Ninjadude973 6 months ago
Watching these actually make me appreciate my Wii. The colors are better, frame rates are better, and I've never experienced any "frame tearing' before. It may not be HD, but it's the best HQ content out there.
Ninjadude973 6 months ago
noobs developers
chaturga13 1 year ago 3
@chaturga13 - bioware? u must not knw what you are talking about.
curseesruc 10 months ago
@curseesruc noob
chaturga13 10 months ago
@chaturga13 - noob comment.
curseesruc 10 months ago
XBOX sanbyakurokuju→sanrokumaru
oops1234666 1 year ago
Fuck man!
I'm a ps3 owner and I would prefer shitter graphics than a frame rate drops like a donkey balls....
specterseal999 1 year ago
@specterseal999 I own a 360 though I'm with you on this one. Lower graphics are a bummer at start, but you can get used to it. Choppy frame rates are not okay. Constantly interrupting your gameplay, really shits you.
RipperLord 1 year ago
huge drops in fps ps3 O_O
TheFred128 1 year ago
ohhh by a divine miracle, the ps3 version got a little melhor.lembrando that when the game and copied to the hd of the xbox 360's performance is greatly improved, and the lens of truth do not know why it never copies the games for xbox 360 the hard disk, stupid people, like the head to head star wars force unleashed, not copied the game for the xbox 360 hd, in the assessment, and the game runs much better when copied to the hd, with no lag
TheFred128 1 year ago
is this Xbox with the HD Cable ? cuz without it xbox Graphics looks like shit xD
debbieee93 1 year ago
ps3 graphics r better,but a bit laggier than xbox 360
bleuviruz 1 year ago
@bleuviruz I must say a mostly agree with you but the graphics on Ps3 arent much better even though they are slight visible things
Yoannaid 1 year ago
i downloaded this on my PC for truly free. just google "ps3 quick download" and click the very first link. What a super ps3 game.
--
On the point of declare by Duck and Cover, testament from a preliminary under wraps in an bidding hearing held in December
TyJimes 2 years ago
This is fantastic its always played around christmas time with my uncle he is very good at it. I actually downloaded it perfectly free for my sony ps3 here; one blow (.) com there are literally hundreds and they are all totally free also I must say 0:04 was excellent
ayeshabrathwaitefu 2 years ago
ps3 version : 24fps average
xbox version : 28fps average
pc version : 75fps average (with better graphics and controls !)
i've to admit it's a difficult choice :/
MsSheenaRamone 2 years ago
@MsSheenaRamone 75 fps?-.-
tiaaaaaa94 1 year ago
see the fps
hans920 2 years ago
i have it on 360 and it runs pretty well most of the time. my only real gripe is that some objects look like CRAP. example, barrels, or a poster on a wall, a sack of wheat, these types of objects can look almost as if they just don't have texture at all. probably due to the amount of content and voice crammed on that dvd. it's a badass game though, and if you like this stuff it's worth picking up for either console really
DESTROYriaa 2 years ago
did they instal the PS3 version ?
turgore 2 years ago
I don't see any difference...lol
Clownbelt 2 years ago
I got it on ps 3 ....
but this is more a dia show ...
xbox isnt much better .
nobody schould trade a console game with lower frames then 30 fps !
disgusting
Hirsch59 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
you can download this playstation 3 game for free. Simply Google "ps3 quick download" - just click the first link. I downloaded it and it's super! There are ton's of ps3 games on the "ps3quickdownload" website!!
Nelliesettful 2 years ago
interesting frame rate on the PS3. Guess im getting it for 360
grove12345 2 years ago
hahah ps3 nice fps^^ haha xbox 360 wins
i have an pes 3 but i useually have to say that the 360 wins
Albii1990 2 years ago
The graphics are noticeably better on the PS3, and the frame rates are noticeably better on the 360. Neither are so great when compared to the PC. =/ I agree with RecklessYouth333. How come the console ports are so obviously inferior?
However, the old guy with the beard at 2:20 is awesome in all three versions, I'm sure. lol But his beard looks so different in the PS3 and 360 versions! It doesn't make sense, and it sucks. =?
ElasticGiraffe 2 years ago
the same
btbam77 2 years ago
how stupid is this comparison..
PC destroys XBOX!!
zin22 2 years ago
I guess there is a reason why the PC version was not included in this comparison, as it is clear to everybody that it is the superior version and that it is a bit different in gameplay. This comparision was made to show the difference between the console version.
Schnittertm1 2 years ago
they should do a triple header comparison, because the PC version shits on both console version in every aspect. From frame rates to graphics, to even gameplay.
humpmasterflex 2 years ago
They did a comparison on Gamespot, apparently the PS3 version , although running a few frames below the 360 version, has an extra layer of textures and load times are far better, which is why they gave the PS3 version a 9.0 and the 360 an 8.5.
michael48892 2 years ago
wow load times too? impressive since blu ray normally loads slower...deserves the higher score
ropo1989 2 years ago
You guys are missing the fact the game has much better texture filtering on PS3. You cant just look at the framerate on this one. Go look at the full comparison on Lens of Truth,
Anybody familiar with my comments knows I'm an extreme 360 fanboy, but I have to admit the PS3 version wins this one.
Cryengine 2 years ago
Both look like crap and have a bad frame rate.
psnChozoLord 2 years ago
i would recommend this game for the pc only.cause the pc versions runs very very smooth n not buggy at all compare to the console ones.
BloodySilence19 2 years ago
I really don't understand how they fucked up the console ports so badly. Mass Effect ran fine on the 360, and although the later PC port was superior, at least the console version could stand on its own. This, however, is disgraceful. The console versions feel and look worse in almost every way.
RecklessYouth333 2 years ago
This game must have some really bad coding. The frame rate is pretty shit on both consoles, but particularly PS3. If MW2 can run at 50 - 60 frames then why does this struggle to run at 20?
IP1NKYI 2 years ago 2
MW2 and its brethren run at 600p and has a relatively small amount of resources to render
also bioware sucks at coding
jive12345 2 years ago 2
i guess its the coding. both consoles cant run at 60fps perfect so i think they either locked it on 30 or one of them had to hold the other one back.
Max160 2 years ago
Biowares console games aren't really stable, Mass Effect 1 has some BAD frame problems, when you're in combat it dips into around 15fps
FunnyGlitcher 2 years ago 2
wat
Brainkiller 2 years ago