Added: 5 years ago
From: SephirothGE
Views: 62,452
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (225)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • these guys are both better than kobe!!

  • duncan and shaq two of the greatest the last 15 years

  • duncan and shaq two of the greatest the last 15 years

  • duncan and shaq two of the greatest the last 15 years

  • Too bad Shaq left L.A. in '04. There could have been plenty more great playoff battles between him and Duncan.

  • EPIC BATTLE

    Duncan vs Shaq like Russel vs Wilt

  • could you inagine shaq on the same team as tim duncan both in their primes

  • Shaq did three-peat , Tim never! btw TD's first champ comes from a shrink season. Tim is the best PF ever thats for sure.

  • @JasonDaiRR

    Wait, so who gives a fuck if Tim Duncan's first ring came from a shorter season?

    The playoffs werent shortened, and thats where he got his ring. You Kobe cocksucks never fail to amaze.

  • @JasonDaiRR the season shrunk but not the play-offs. i believe duncan's spurs dismantled shaq's lakers during their 12-1 play-off run that year.

  • why this all mother fucker talk about hakeem and robinson shit????

  • Best Center/Most dominant = Shaq... Best PF/Best Depositor on the Bank (Bank Shot lol) = TImmy

  • for a period of i think 7 years every NBA championship was either Duncan or Shaq's

  • Duncan.... enough said!

  • spurs need a center.

  • @WeLuvBabyDengue i have no idea why they traded theo ratliff. he was a pretty decent center. well they got there most important problem out of the way(resigning Manu) so now this offseason they can go out and shop for a good center.

  • best C and best PF

  • @ananasassful shaq is not the best center.

  • Tim DUNCAN = Greatest PF of all time!!!!

  • i was playing a diffrent version off swagger like us (with will victory) and it seemed to fit this video very good lol you should try it.

  • are you kidding me Hakeem vs Robinson hakeem made david look like a little kid in the second championship year conference finals robinson is good but hakeem was on a whole nother level , here duncan has to get around the other players and beat them with skill and speed, shaq just muscles them outta the way thats not skill hes athletic but he can just push people out of the way

  • Shaq was the MASTER of that Baseline Spin in the post. no one executes that quite like him. he is probably the most Skilled Center in the History of the NBA when it comes to the post.

    iLL .

  • yeh dude for some reason duncan and shaq are the only big men to utilize that baseline spinmove on a regular basis, it's an icredibly effective move

  • @iLL271 Hakeem was the best in the Post. He gave up some height and weight but still put in work in the post. watch his playoff games against Patrick Ewing, Karl Malone , Shaq, and David Robinson. He even played against the 80's Celtics in the finals which had the best front court in nba history. Shaq is still good though

  • I have to say Shaq is better. Author haven`t added the best moments of Shaq`s career, in this video most of Shaq`s moments are from 2000(or 2001) Play-offs :) Plus Shaqs best seasons are much better than Duncans best seasons. They both are great players, but Shaq is better.

  • I'd take Duncan over Shaq. He has achieved more and has nothing more to prove.

    An NBA Champion multiple times,an MVP multitple times, unselfish, great leader and unquestioned role model having finished school at Wake Forest.

  • what the hell,shaq is the most dominanted player ever,more then wilt and more then jordan,

  • but he could never repeat as a champion.

  • Both Hakeem and Robinson were much more versetile than Shaq. They could play perimiter defense, and had great hands. They could steal the ball to create turnovers for their team, and both had better shot blocking ability than Shaq did even in his best year. They had better passing skills, Robinson actually had a jumpshot which Shaq doesn't. Both Hakeem and Robinson shot 30% better from FT line so they didn't hurt their team late in the game with missed free throws.

  • They all had good rebounding ability. None better than the other. Robinson and Hakeem had better shot blocking ability. They both had MUCH better hands to steal the ball (5x as many steals as Shaq ever got), they disrupted passing lanes, which Shaq never does. Forced twice as many turnovers as Shaq. . .dude your nuts thinking Shaq is better. You must be young and have not seen them play or something, if you think Shaq is better. You're either very stupid, or very inexperienced. Or biased.

  • Comment removed

  • Right, I'm a piece of shit because I'm right, and made you look stupid, because you don't know your basketball history.

    And you won't do shit either, besides run your mouth online. I bet I'd knock you out in one hit irl.

    2932, 20th street. North Chicago IL. Come to my house, and talk shit to me. I bet you won't, because you're clearly a pussy. The worst you will do is claim you will to save face on youtube, then not show up like a little bitch.

    Predictable little boy.

  • There was no center better than shaq in the old days.

  • lol? Hakeem Olajuwon and David Robinson were both better. Shaq didn't become the best center until Hakeem retired and David was in the last few years of his career (when Duncan came along, he let Duncan grow by taking a secondary role)

    Typical years in the "old days" for Robinson and Hakeem:

    Robinson: 25-30 PPG. 11-12 RPG. 3.3-4.5 BPG (no joke), 1.3-2.3 SPG. 2.5-5 APG.

    Hakeem: 23-26 PPG. 11.5-14 RPG. 1.5-3.5 APG. 2.5-4.5 BPG (yep), 1.5-2.5 SPG.

    Both of them > Shaq. EASILY

  • shaq is better than the dream and the admiral. statistically he is better and he has more rings than they are. the dream and the admiral did sweep shaq once in the playoffs, but he was inexperienced. if he had played them in his prime, shaq would destroy them.

  • Statistically, Shaq is inferior to both of them.  All Shaq has is more rings. And you must have a good team to get rings. When you have to resort to who has more rings, you've already lost the argument.

    Robinson: 25-30 PPG. 11-12 RPG. 3.3-4.5 BPG (no joke), 1.3-2.3 SPG. 2.5-5 APG.

    Hakeem: 23-26 PPG. 11.5-14 RPG. 1.5-3.5 APG. 2.5-4.5 BPG (yep), 1.5-2.5 SPG.

    Shaq in his prime: 28.5 PPG, 12.5 RPG, 2 BPG, 0.5 SPG, 3 APG. 50% FT%.

  • who do you think is better david robinson or hakeem. as an overall player not statistically?

  • That's a good question. Hakeem was more of a dominating force at center, but Robinson was the most all-around quality center I can remember. I guess it would depend. vs a player like Hakeem, or Shaq in his prime, you might want the heavier Hakeem to combat him on a 1 0n 1 level. But Robinson probably has the edge everywhere else oddly enough, due to his speed, good mid-range shot, and being left-handed. But both were great, I'd take either of those two over any other possible Center.

  • yes, i agree both are great. but since im a spurs fan, i'll take dave. lol. but seriously, the 2 are hall of famers.

  • I'd probably take David too, very few players could do what he did. 2.5 steals a game, 4+ blocks a game, 11-12 rebounds a game, 26-28 points a game, even 4 assists a game as a center. Shooting a high %, and being a good FT shooter too. Total package. Not to mention his speed, and amazing defense.

  • he had 2+ steals with 4 blocks. damn he's a beast. hahaha. it's a good thing he was able to cap his career with a ring

  • Yeah, a lot of people underrated Robinson, for whatever reason I can't understand. The only thing I can think of is that they've never seen him play, plus think he can't have been good since he didnt' earn a ring 'til late in his career. But you're only 1 guy on a team of 8+, so there's only so much one guy can do. But yeah, in his prime D.R. averaged 2.5 steals and 4.5 blocks per game, along with his 28 points and 12 boards. Very very underrated player.

  • @SinJackal not to mention a 71 point game...and a quad double

  • they were both great players. hakeem had the repertoire of moves and robinson had a wicked outside touch and inside game. hakeem was blessed with better coach and a better supporting cast. (i am talking about pre-duncan of course) so if you put robinson on the 94 and 95 rockets champ team, they would still win. if you put olajuwon on the spurs team in 94 and 95, they might not fare well.

  • 2003 was the end because it was the end of the Lakers. Shaq and Kobe couldn't get a long a hundred miles away from each other. And Strength is something that not everyone has.

    Like Knowledge it to is a gift. Other wise we'd all be athlets.

  • Come on--this is basketball people and the guy is one of the most pathetic shooters of all time. this isn't wrestling. Who can admire this guy? Any 7'2 350 pound guy out there can rebound a ball and dunk on people (except they would probably shoot better)

  • I can admire him man he's my favorite player has been since Orlando.

    Has four rings one of the most dominate big men of the game.

    Not too many people have stopped him or the teamates he's had.

    I don't know just seems to me anyone who doesn't see that just doesn't know the game of basketball.

  • Hey--I don't argue with you that he has the resume to go down as one of the best, I just can't admire the way he's done it. Just shoving people around cuz he's bigger than them and dunkin the ball (because he can't shoot worth a damn). I think basketball should be a little more than that

  • Fat or not, no one is a wide as he is...how can someone admire a player that stands under a basket to shoot 1 foot jumpers and then miss half the time...he has to push people aside and dunk to finally get his points. Compare that to what guys like kobe, nash, duncan do. They dominate a basketball game with passing, shooting, dribbling, and skill. The only reason people like shaq is cuz they won championships with him but in reality there's nothing about him to admire

  • Go fuck your self all you Shaq haters. Just because he's stopped your teams from getting rings.

  • he didnt stop duncan

  • Shaq and Kobe beat David Robinson and Tim Duncan for the Western converance 2000-2001, 2001-2002

    L.A. Lakers 4, San Antonio 0

    May 19: Sat., L.A. Lakers 104 at San Antonio 90

    May 21: Mon., L.A. Lakers 88 at San Antonio 81

    May 25: Fri., San Antonio 72 at L.A. Lakers 111

    May 27: Sun., San Antonio 82 at L.A. Lakers 111

    Sorry man but I got you on that one.

  • Who knock out LA to stop their streak of championships in 2003? That was sweet. After shaq left the spurs have had a better team than the lakers up til now when LA can finally compete

  • Tim got shaq back in '03 and last yr against phoenix, and I guarantee the spurs would have beat miami if the spurs got past the mavs in '06, shaq and wade were bailed out against dallas by the refs

  • only reason why spurs won cause of hack a shaq, but shaq got better at free throw line now, we'll see at playoffs

  • Comment removed

  • completely agree bv69pr. I wonder what % of shaqs made field goals in his career came from within 2 or 3 feet of the rim. 99% would be my guess, and look at shaqs FT%. guys argue its bc of his size and or height yet look at Yao's FT%. The guy must have a handicap if he cant learn after playing for as long as he has.

  • The guys going down with the second highest shooting percentage a foor or not its till second best.

  • i hope so when every shot you take is within 2 feet of the rim. the sad part is that his FT% has been higher than his FG% in only 2 seasons in his entire career.

  • I know shaq has the titles and stats to be considered great but the fact is he has no talent. Any guy w/ his body would have those numbers. He can't even shoot a 5-foot jumper. Having rings doesn't make you talented. Look at Yao Ming--no rings but 100 times more talent than O'neal, just no fat body to push people around

  • you're such a dumbass cum juggler. Lets say shaq was all power and he had no talent for sake of argument. Okay, what's wrong with that? I didn't and still don't see anybody as big and strong as Shaq was in 2000-2003. So he must have possessed something whether it be physical, mental or both that nobody else has ever had in the NBA (except maybe barkley). But Why is strength a bad thing?

    Getting away from that now, Shaq had a myriad of post moves which required quickness and strength. no mre ltr

  • strength is not a bad thing when you're up against people your size. Its like praising Lennox Lewis for kicking ass in the feather weight class. I'd like to see what shaq can do in a court of people his size. He didn't even became dominant until he got really big when he was w/ LA. In his young career he was ok and quick like Dwight Howard is today but Howard is probably more talented and athletic than a young O'neal

  • Are you calling someone thats 7'1 325 fat thats skinny for a guy that size. Most football Players are 6'3 325.

  • How can you even compare duncan to o'neal. Duncan is a true basketball player with basketball skills and O'neal is just a big fat guy who never ran into somebody big enough to stop him from dominating the paint. Duncan is listed above o'neal in all-time players even though O'neal has always been overrated only cuz of his weight

  • They are both awesome players that have led their teams to titles, 8 rings between them.... there is nothing bad. haters will hate,

  • fuck duncan fuck spurs

  • Also hoopstar FYI Shaq is the youngest player to be on the list of the 50 GREATES PLAYERS OF ALL TIME, ALL TIME, is Tim Duncan on there, nope. So if your going to tell me that Shaq wasn't on NBA First Team in his Rookie Year, get your facts straight. It was 1996 when Shaq was put on the list of the 50th Greatest Players his fourth year in the league. Shaq clearly better than Duncan.

  • skinniest video ever

  • hoopstar in case you don't know the Spurs are not going anywhere also the Suns have a better than the spurs and Duncan hasn't shown me anything why he's a very good defensive. In fact the Spurs are at the bottom of the league in defense and throughout Duncans years they at the top in the NBA in defense. If I were you I would shut my mouth up. The Spurs are not going anywhere. Plus you can't compare the two one's a center and the other is a power forward.

  • Shaq: Duncan's championships don't really matter because he is not really a 'true' big man.

    Reporter: Who guards Duncan in the 4th Quarter?

    Shaq: I do.

    Reporter: Who guards you?

    Shaq: He does.

  • Hey Hey both of them have 4 rings on they`re fingers, but one of them didnt lose in the NBA finals hehe..twice

  • suck my cock shaq lost once in the finals bitch cock sucking rapist dick helmet head rapist ballbuster nipple twister!

  • Shaq lost twice in the finals.. 95 and 04.

  • Two completely different kinds of players playing two different positions. This is a stupid conversation.

  • duncan is the best period

  • shaq is better whos got to the finals more shaq 6-4

  • the 2 best big men since the jordan era is duncan and shaq...but at the end.. duncan is gona be better!

  • 20Z9 u dont kno wtf ur talkin about, u dont even kno shit about basketball. Duncan was the 2nd ever to be a rookie of the year.. and make the all nba first team.. only other to do it is larry bird! did shaq do that? nope. shaq aint gona win anything anymore, he only has like 2 more years in him.. and he aint even doin nothin now! hes stuck on 4 rings.. and duncan.. he has like 4 - 6 good years left. have u seen what he has done without manu and parker.. he can easily put up big numbers.!

  • If you didn't look at the past meeting between the Suns Spurs, the Suns won in the end Shaq will have more championships than Duncan and SHaq will be the better big man. Plus you really can't compare the two Shaq is a center and Duncan is a power forward, so you really can't say who is better.

  • i dont kno what wtf u just said.. lol.. but shaq aint gona win shit anymore, if u watched about the suns a lil more, u would kno that amare is gettin tired of the suns offense and might want out. they suck! the suns suck!! they should of kept shaun marion. just how the mavs fucked up by trading devin harris. i mean kidd still has it.. but do u see what harris was been doin for the nets. anyways duncan is better!! and this year is an odd year. u kno how the story goes. spurs nba champs 2009 :)

  • To Add emphaty to this battle..Tim has more of the winning factor over the big fellow..

    Wanna know why?

    Tim has not lost in the NBA FINALS.

    PERIOD

  • someone who knos wgat hes talkin abt

  • Hahaha CAREER AVERAGES you mean??

    It doesnt matter how point you score, its a palyers over-all effiency all through out-the-game..

    Well have you been watching the playoffs this past decade?

    Whenever the lakers are in trouble, who saves theyre asses?

    KOBE BRYANT right?

    Shaq is unstoppable, yeah, but Tim is a more realible player for his team not because of his offense but his defense as well..

    To sun it all up..Tim can make the worst to good..shaq can too

    , yeah but only in the beginning..

  • For those of the people that say Duncan is better that's b.s. first of all look at their point averages Shaq in his career has averages 25 points per game Duncan has averaged 21 points per game plus the Spurs are not going to the NBA Championship, they're not even going to the playoffs. In the NBA it's all about unstoppable force and Shaq in his prime was unstoppable Tim Duncan couldn't stop him, Duncan today can't score well on Shaq. Shaq hands down is better.

  • tim is better then shaq lol... best PF to play the game

  • spurs only won cause the refs were in their pockets.

    spurs only beat the lakers once in the early 2000s when the rivalry was really intense. robinson and duncan couldsn't stop shaq

  • Tim Duncan never had Kobe Bryant... or Dwayne Wade... think about it.

  • Yeah, he only had David fucking Robinson for his first 2 championships, and then he had probably the best backcourt in the NBA and the best defensive swingman in the NBA for the next 2... yeah no help there.. pssssssssssh

  • Everyone needs help man!! That does not take away from how great Tim is or whoever else had help to win it all. Shaq had a top 5 player beside him in Kobe as well, Jordan had the all around Pippen, peace....

    BTW Robinson was 37 the second title, far away from his prime, limited to defense and blocked shots, and very rarely scoring that year sides from putbacks or open dunks off Duncan feeds. I think he had what 8 and 7 that year?

  • And how many championships have won these two players combined without shaq??

    Please, these are the 2 best players in the league since Jordan retirement by far, so stop overrating flashy guards like those, only LeBron can achieve same levels of dominance.

  • hey toughie come down and see me or quit this.. bullshit

  • DO WHAT?

  • this is about the third call you made today

  • hey does yur momma still got uh.. worms crawlin out her pussy?

  • Fugg kew!

  • these two players don't compare, Little Timmy is way fucking better!

  • what tha fuck is with the lord of the rings music in the beginning..its not like were about to watch hoppits!

  • duncan is better

  • dont get me rong i like Tim heck i love Tim but...Shaq whoul eat him!

  • duncan will retake what's right fully his mvp back to back once he can still do it again!

  • Shaq dont have nothing for tim duncan

  • They're both players who play to their advantages. Shaq has bulk, power, and deceptive quickness, Duncan's got length/long arms and a wider set of moves to use, probably since he can't physically overpower people. Neither has the athleticism they once had, which so far seems to be favoring Tim.

  • I agree wit everything u put but what you left out that duncan has more the advantage over shaq is duncan is more a team player he doesn't care about gettin 30 a game duncan's the type of player that trustes his team players....spurs 09 champs hell yeah bow down!!!

  • both r good players

  • its really hard to compare these two dominant post players because i respect both of them. Shaq seems more overpowering with brute strength while Tim Duncan uses agility and fundamental skills..they both are tough players to guard

  • tim duncan is better cause hes da only player to face a prime shaq. show tim duncan blocking shaq.

  • stut the fuck up duncan is better 2 mvp stupid

  • gotta give it up for tim's spin move to a baseline floater, just beautiful stuff really.

  • Tim Duncan can do that spin move like Shaq can plus Shaq does use his brain to. Had he not been with the Lakers the would not win those championships and they still can't without him. Shaq is better.

  • and everyones know duncan is protected by the refrees unlike shaq. but i respect to duncan he is very skillfull player. but i prefer shaq.

  • i don't think duncan is quicker than shaq's prime days.generally people forget how fast shaq run to fast break and and moves quickly downlow when he was in orlando and lakers.shaq has skills too.i prefers shaq's prime years to duncan's.duncan+robinson<shaq he proved it many times

  • tim duncan is a better player than shaq.

  • shaq is a strong player, that can dunk in anyone face

    duncan has more ability than shaq, is quicker and can shoot

    but both are great players

  • shaq 4 rings duncan 4 rings, good comparison

  • duncan uses his brain man....best ever...hes the reason why the spurs win...GO SPURS GO

  • shaqster13, this is NBA basketball not like WWE or UFC fight...

  • That's right.Maybe Shaq had better individual skills in his prime but it's all about being consistent.Duncan!!But I love Shaq

  • Duncan is more skilled than Shaq ever dream to be, you don't need skill when you are as big as Shaq, he just powered through everyone in his prime.

  • Shaq has lost all his abilities since his injuries. That shows he has been a more phisycal player than Tim.

    Duncan could play basket till 40 years cause hes the big fundamental and doesnt depend on his physique.

    That's the reason why i'd pick Tim but both are great players.

  • Hello! The playoff series told it all!! The first duncan owned. and shaq couldn't do any thing series!! DUNCAN!!

  • shaq has lost his skill hes too old now

  • duncan is more consistent than shaq, but shaq has higher average than duncan in his prime!!!!!!

  • GO SPURS GO!

  • shag is getting old . compare duncan and shag in the past. shag owns him

  • Lets look at the matchup stats.

    Playoff record against 3 - 3

    Titles - 4 - 4

    Individual stats are disregarded here. They are about even so pretty much take your pick. You can make a very good case for either of them if you ask me so it really comes down to who you are a fan of. Im a fan of Timmy but they are both great imo. They are just different kinds of players.

  • Duncan is the better big man reason being: he defends the post as best as anybody, he can defend multiple positions, he has a lot more offensive options than Shaq, is a smarter player than Shaq, gets opponents in foul trouble and has more MVP's!!

    Shaq can dunk, draw lots of fouls and guard the post pretty good, but thats about it!!

    Duncan takes it for me!!

  • shaq seems to have more brute force and strength than duncan while duncan has more skills and fundamentals

  • I used to look forward to the Lakers vs Spurs games just to watch these guys play. Right now, Duncan is better. But back when Shaq was on the Lakers, there were few in history that can compete with what he did.

  • Both players are amazing and I respect Tim Duncan and both players play different styles. I know that people say that Duncan is better than Shaq but if I had a big man in his prime between the two I would choose Shaq because Shaq in his prime was just unstoppable and I have a hard time believing that Duncan is better than Shaq. Both players in the end are first ballad Hall of Famers, no disrespect to Duncan, but in the end I think Shaq will be the better big man.

  • This is clearly proof that u didnt even watch the suns and spurs playoffs. Duncan owned shaq Shaq the reason the suns got put out.

  • dude what are you saying. Tim Duncan was considered the best player in the league his first year and won the nba title his second year, and he is more versatile then shaq. In game six of the 2003 nba finals, Tim Duncan had 20pts, 20 rebs, 10 assists and eight blocks, he does not need to drop 31to41 ppg, to make a statment and make people see that he is doing something, he won that game and got his second finals mvp.

  • Proved what? Shaq is clearly past his prime but still hinders Duncan's efficiency in the post when they go head to head.

  • duncan proved it to shaq in the suns/spurs series.

    case closed.

  • what is the song????

  • This is actually harder then it looks. but i think shaq gets the edge on this one because shaq is different then most people think he is. They think all he do is power someone in and then dunk on them. But no! shaq had probably the best footwork for any center. maybe he didn't show or u guys didn't see it but he always works his feet to get in primo postioning for rebounds and even to hit those jump hooks he does sometimes.

  • shaq who is duncan, shaq was the LCL in the game unitil dwight howard shaq = power =3 titles in a row

  • you cant say that one of them is better over the other. you have to be specific. Shaq is powerful and can ass-bump any one and dunk over them, at least in his early years. Duncan is all smooth. he can hit the baby hook, take you outside and hit the 18 footer, and beat you with his smarts. the true test of who is better is when youre team is down by 1, with 5 seconds to go, who do you want to take the shot to win it?

  • both are incredible best of there time but shaq was more of a dominate player i dont no i like shaq better

  • Duncan is the best in the planet

  • Shaq is the premier low post offensive player of this era, which I guess is his main job, but he absolutely has to have a kobe bryant or dwayne wade type offensive player, and a solid defensive crew for the rest of the team, to win at a championship level. Duncan, however, is by far the superior player in nearly every other aspect of the game, and if he's not injured can win at the championship level as long as there are no gaping inadquacies with the rest of the team as a whole.

  • TD rules man he's my favorite player.

  • Shaquille O'Neal is going to be a Phoenix Sun..

  • Duncan.

  • Duncan is better all around player. Better player to build around. Shaq is the most intimidating player physically. Having said that, I would take Duncan any day, any year.

  • Shaq is much better

  • Only a fuckin idiot wouldn't take a prime O'Neal over a prime Duncan..many NBA anaylsts have said they'd take a vintage SHAQ over Duncan..so get over it.

  • dude I'll take a vintage Duncan over a vintage shaq and a present duncan over a present shaq. People are saying shaq should retire.

  • How Many First Team All-Defensive Teams Has Shaq Made.His FAtass Probably went like three times Duncan Did it 9 years in A Row

  • oluajowon and Duncan Can Shake Shaq Off His Fat Ass Shoes

  • Go suck a dick

  • Wtf? Shaq has gotten older, you know. Maybe you didn't realize. Does he STILL have 3.5 blocks? HELL NO. Duncan's defense is just better. Period. Shaq doesn't take many charges because he'll injure himself if he falls on his ass, but Duncan has taken many.

  • you must be drunk TD crossed shaq's fatass into oblivion. Count TD's rings and count shaqs. PS Miami is finished no more rings for shaq. TD is gonna get another ring this year too.

  • LIAR. Shaq has dominated and shut down Duncan on numerous occasions. Dunca's great, but Shaq's broken WAY more playoff records, played in more games, and gotten more wins, points, rebounds, and blocks than duncan in the playoffs.

    The only thing i'll give timmy is that the 1st 2 times he won he didn't have a premier perimiter player.

  • Right now miami is the worst team in the nba. Shaq will never have as many rings as TD.

  • Maybe because Shaq was drafted alot earlier, fuckface..

  • dumbass use ur fucking head if he was drafted earlier he should have more rings than duncan. Damn shaq has some dumbass fans.

  • Not as fuckin stupid as you, fucknut. Figthin with a Piston fan, now a Spur fan..what a life..

  • You have half a brain u retard. Lakers are garbage. Wheres Mario?????

  • People dont like TD because he's a boring player but he's really good and the best power forward in the league. Shaq cant hold TD.

  • Duncan owns Shaq anyday. Shaq was good, but now he's past his prime days and getting old. Now he just relies on his strength to push shit...and get away with it. Duncan is a great unselfish leader, and he can do something Shaq can't: SHOOT! Not to mention his defense is much better too. To all you Shaq fans, NBA is not just about offense...

  • O'Neal punks Duncan's timid ass...so shove it the argument is over!

  • you retarded Duncan owns shaq

  • HEY DUM SHITS. SHAQ OWNS DUNCAN NUMBER WISE ANY DAY OF THE WEEK. TEAM WISE DUNCAN HAS HAD MUCH BETTER ROLE PLAYERS...SHAQ MADE HIS TEAM GREAT SO STFU. ANY TIME ONE ON ONE SHAQ HAS OBLITERATED DUNCAN and ROBINSON AT THE SAME TIME

  • timmy owns shaq"' the master of traveling shaq is only 1 dimensional, timmy has countless ways to destroy you jealous fucks'' timmy eats shaq up the way hakeem used to do. the spurs kill the lakers have been too.

  • Duncan is alot better than shaq...

    duncans more of a crafty unselfish defensive humble SMART player...a great leader that lead more than 10 players with a championship ring...

    shaq, ..well hes good..fat and BIG. but cant level to duncans skill playing footwork cutting lanes talent off the glass bank shots. ..there both good monster players, ..but gotta give to TD.

  • thanks indie for being the only other smart perosn on this site here about timmy. we know timmy annilates shaq .

  • exept Duncan the best player in the league

  • are you kiding?lol

    kobe is the best player in the league

  • Nobody on the planet Earth compares to Shaq.

  • Shamu does

  • your right kobe is not michael but michael isnt kobe either...kobe could score on jordan as well jordan could score on kobe...there both greater scores and players...kobe just needs a player to help him score like jordan had scottie and he could get some more rings

  • tim duncan is way better and kobe bryant sux balls he will never be michael jordan..and duncan has mad the all star team ever year of his career and has many 1st team offensive and defensive titles

  • TD has fundamentals yet Shaq has greater athleticism, Shaq also used to have higher energy. But TD has the somewhat rare midrange shot.