Added: 3 months ago
From: ZooLiberation
Views: 3,964
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Kreaper here stealing Manager's account for a minute. When I saw a few commercial vids, I was horrified, it's just not right. Reptiles/avians/eels/octopus/f­ish are NEVER acceptable. The few amateur video sites I've seen usually seem okay and are made by zoophiles, but if there's something not right I leave immediately. Crush stuff is just fucking sick, there's no words to describe how terrifying it is to see people, actual people, doing that to a creature.

  • What you said about this crush thing shocked me :O

  • While I don't agree with everything you say I think you are representing the Zoo community, whether everyone agrees with you or not, quite well. :3

  • A bestialist, by definition, is anyone that has sex with a non-human animal. Further, a zoophile is one that loves an animal and may or may not have sex with, or be sexually attracted to, non-human animals. Further still, a zoosexual is one that loves and is sexually attracted to (and may have sex with) non-human animals. Being a bestialist is not inherently negative, the negative phrase for one only using an animal like a sex toy is "pure bestialist."

  • Are, crush videos and stuffing humans with live animals zooporn?

    I dislike and avoid most commercial porn for the same reason, though, zooporn made by real animal lovers is awesome. :3

    If you think that training an animal for non-sexual activities is OK, by logic you must think is OK to train them for sex. Not doing so would be a double standard. Which is why I don't mind if other people train animals for sex. But is not something I would do, you will eventually reach the same conclusion. :P

  • @DogsneedpIeasuretoo I will not eventually reach the same conclusion, we train animals for basic things for their benefit, not ours because if we didn't train them and they were aggressive and bit someone, they would end up put to death, if we didn't train them to go potty outside, they would be living in their own waste, etc. Training a dog for sex is for whose benefit?, not theirs because if it was, they would want to do it naturally and they wouldn't need training.

  • @ZooLiberation

    Does that means you are against some one training his dog to give the paw?

  • @ZooLiberation Im not saying that Im into this but theres A LOT of dogs that would just mount a naked girl and go at it if she was caught in the right possition for it. And dogs that would lick down there if a girl was just laying on her bed naked without even thinking about wanting the dog to do that. Its possible that the dogs in actual porn videos are trained, but theres a lot of "family dogs" that would just go at it without being asked to... And I wouldnt call THAT "abuse" if I saw it...

  • @michellenn93 I don't doubt that there are, I never said I was against bestiality. I was just elaborating about what goes on in many bestiality porno movies. I know full well that dogs don't have to be trained :)

  • "who would put that in there anyway, eww" Hmmm... odd considering... I do concur however, abuse under any circumstance is unacceptable. I think the majority of people don't make the distinction between zoophiles and beastalists. I like to refer that to the same as people who have sex and rapists. Same with pedophiles and child molesters. Semantics I know, but none the less... I think "zoo's" should distance themselves from beastal films and make a point of it. Keep the vids coming. :) *sub*

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more