Added: 3 years ago
From: Ishoozedotcom
Views: 2,416
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (544)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Laughing at all the angry fundies, in CT, conservative or liberal, we mind our own business. And ain't NOBODIES business but the gays who they marry.

    So take your frothing anger to your own sorry states where nosing into other's rights is apparently A-OK.

  • **ATTENTION CONNECTICUT CITIZENS***

    Westboro Baptist Church will be in Brookfield, CT protesting the showing of the Laramie Project on March 13th at 7:15

    COUNTER-PROTEST!!!!!!!!

    EVERYONE MUST GO PLEASE!!!!!

    MAKE SIGNS

    Make signs for yourself and extras to hand out!!!!

    If you have no one to go with, go by yourself, who cares, everyone there will be your friend.

    I WANT 100's THERE!!!!

    ~PLEASE GO, OR IF NOT, SPREAD THE WORD~

  • Nonsense. There are no studies to show this is true. Also, there is no good reason that women or men can raise a child just as well as any other mix of family.

  • There is nothing new about homosexuality, it has been a fringe issue for most of human history the problem is that it never has been, is not and never will be the "norm". Thus pushing same-sex marriage and the specific sexual practices into being taught as normal or acceptable what have you is part of the homosexual agenda since they do not reproduce...and again, never have, do not and never will.

    Yes they can adopt but studies show these children often have many more issues due to this.

  • but its ok for those opposed to same sex marriage to push their beliefs on the children?

  • There's nothing wrong with heteros owning business's either but if gays are going to try to boycott ours we may return the favor. In fact let's just do it now, boycott all businesses and people who voted no on Prop 8. It's a smaller number anyway.

  • i live in ct and this is a tragedy. this abomination of two men or women being with each other. we a human beings should be ashamed of ourselves. how can anyone think two men or women being together is right. come on people. god is going to show us his wrath soon and make us pay for sins like these.

  • I'm certainly not ashamed of myself. I believe every human being should be entitled to happiness with whomever they choose it with. How do you know if God will show us his wrath soon? It it because Obama is president? OH NO!! lol. Obama is the anti-christ!!?. lol.

    GO OBAMA!

  • first off i voted for obama and if you know anything you would know that obama does not support gay marriage! he supports unions between gay couples but marriage is pushing it he said. which i have to agree with him. two people of the same sex doesnt make any sense and should not exist. if you and your gay partner were the last two people on earth well guess the human race would vanish now wouldnt it! dont worry the devil is waiting for you when you die. enjoy enternity with him.

  • I'm entitled to my opinion and you to yours. And I don't believe I'm going to Hell for believing Gays should be allowed to get married. I'm a straight person, who voted for obama, and are aware of his views. I'm at least happy that he believes in Unions.

  • i'd rather be with the devil than your stupid god who has too many fucking bigot rules that promotes violence and war.

  • if narrow minded bigots like you make it into heaven

    im sure the gays would take hell

    gays do not choose to be gay

    they are born that way, so wouldnt that mean god made them that way?

  • "if you and your gay partner were the last two people on earth well geuss the human race would canish now wouldnt it" Are you serious? that has got to be one of the most raterded comments i have ever seen.

    I could easly say "if two men were the last humans left the human race is gone, same for two women." you really need to go back to school. two men getting married doesnt effect anything, or two women.

  • even if one man and one women were left the human race would still die out. It would be incest and the gene's would break down in each generation until life can no longer exist. duh

  • Comment removed

  • Its impossible for God to hate anyone, Gay, Straight, religious bigots or non-religious bigots.

  • God shall cast judgment...YES ON 8. KILL FAGS!!! GOD BLESS!!!!

  • Not very nice man

  • WOOOOOO GO CONNETICUT!!!!!!!!!

  • God hates Conneticut and God hates fags.

  • It's time to boycot all gay owned businesses and gay providers. They've gone too far. We need to make sure they no longer have the money or means to wage their heterophobic battles.

  • Theres nothing wrong with gays getting married, let alone owning business.

  • Ooops, I mean "they're" not bothering you. Sry, sp!

  • Good for the gays,they finally have legal marriage. Now all I'm waiting for is for them to get divorced and be as unhappy as us straights...lol...but in all seriousness, good for the gays. This year is pretty historic, black president, now the gays, whats next?

  • in the end, it is impossible to violate the civil rights of individualistic people (gays) who by the way are taxpaying citizens and fight for our country......reminds me of the revolution in 1700s..........homophobes are inssecure of their own sexuality (ask any psychologist) and last but not least jealous (consciously or not) of courageous individualists (gays),,,yes, very jealous

  • Looks like we'll have to go and fix that state too. We won't stop until Marriage and family values are protected in every state. The opposition needs to worry, we're just getting started.

  • Tell me then, what ARE family values?

  • Why should you go and fix CT? It isn't your life is it? There not bothering you directly are they? Maybe you should leave them alone.

  • Thank you for being a considerate person. Caring for fellow man is lacking in this country...between the hatred for Obama because he's black and anti-latino (anti-immigrant feelings) to homophobia, this country is heading for a possible fracture and it's very troubling.

  • BOOOOOOOOOOOM!

    PROP 8 WINS!!!!

    Power to the people once again putting those 4 raggedy judges in their place.

    One down, two to go

  • BeatBuddy, the answer is you don't have an answer, period, have a blessed day, lol

  • While everybody has the right to marriage under the law, the people have the right to define marriage as between a man and a woman, like it has always been in this country.

    Regardless of the right to it, marriage has always been a privilege, yet sadly people do not treat it as such and abuse this ability.

  • The people have the right to decide if races can intermarry.

    The people have the right to decide if gentiles can marry Jews.

    The Catholic Church has the right to decide if its members can marry Protestants.

    Fathers have the right to decide who their daughters can marry.

    Sound familiar? These are all prohibitions that actually existed at some point in hisotry.

    I would never forsake a right or a need for the maintenance of a definition.

  • "marriage has always been a privilege,"

    Wrong. Marriage is a right. That has been decided by the Supreme Court on two separate occasions:

    Skinner vs Oklahoma

    Loving vs Virginia

    It's been stated that when gays seek to marry, they seek "special rights". This is oxymoronic nonsense. A right, by definition, can't be special. If something is a right, it's for everybody. If something is for only a select group, then it becomes a privilege.

  • **SIGH** back to GTA 4

  • Congratulations CONNECTICUT!! I cant wait till Indiana has full Marriage EQUALITY.. WE LOVE AND SALUTE ALL OF YOU ENJOYING MARRIAGE

  • oops accidentally on my cousins name

  • I am disgusted with my home state of CT. So much history and great men have come from here in the past yet today it continues to head downhill. At a college campus I went through there was gay pride graffiti all over. I am sick and tired of this special treatment. They will never earn my support or approval. Keep your business to yourself and the majority of people including myself won't care.

  • But you care in any case. The very fact that you think gays should keep their sexualities under wraps reveals an intense anxiety over gay people. The problem is your anxiety, not homosexuality. When gays come out of their closets, what they are saying is that they reject the shame and guilt that they're "supposed" to feel. To stay hidden implies a sense of shame that is morbid and unhealthy. Gay visibility is here to stay, so you better get used to it.

  • "The problem is your anxiety, not homosexuality."

    No the problem is homosexuals trying to redefine marriage and fill everyone else's kids up with garbage foul teachings in public schools.

    "Gay visibility is here to stay, so you better get used to it. "

    If you visibly and openly show Public display of affection in front of my kids I'm gonna ask you to stop or embarrass you or openly rebuke you.

  • "No the problem is homosexuals trying to redefine marriage and fill everyone else's kids up with garbage foul teachings in public schools."

    Strongly agreed, that's crossing the line teach your own children that garbage, oh wait they can't have children Krazie, lol

  • Kraize how have you out done me on exsperience? Tell me what you have exsperienced bigger & better? From your Pic's it looked as though you & you wife exsperienced alot of drive throughs,,, Viva Taco Bell! Isnt Glutoney one of the Deadly sins, Hmmmmmmmmmm?

  • Have to tell you something about Krazie. He's an intellectually dishonest person, and I can give you my complete guarantee that he'll deny it.

  • Please tell me more.

  • "From your Pic's it looked as though you & you wife exsperienced alot of drive throughs,,, Viva Taco Bell!"

    What pics are you talking about, we don't have pics imbicil

    And I've done a lot more at my age than you did when you were here

  • Not to mention I'm 6 foot 1 and far from fat I've got no idea what the heck you're talking about

  • Marriage has been in a flux of redefinition throughout history. If tradition is your defense, and if this tradition clashes with fairness and justice, then it's time to buck the traditional definition.

    "If you visibly and openly show Public display of affection in front of my kids I'm gonna ask you to stop or embarrass you or openly rebuke you."

    That's tough for you. I don't accept your standards and I approve of mine. I am under no obligation to tailor myself to suit your prejudice.

  • "That's tough for you. I don't accept your standards and I approve of mine."

    That be prepared for what I said I I see you doing it

  • So that is not your pic on the Power Praise Website? What have you done at you age?

  • "So that is not your pic on the Power Praise Website"

    I'm not the pastor am I, I'm head musician but the one taking all the pictures I'm not really on their.

    My pic is on my youtube avatar

  • Tell you minister he needs to read the bible on Glutony.

  • Who's his minister, James Hagee?

  • "Tell you minister he needs to read the bible on Glutony."

    He's not fat neither is she, she had some big arms at the time could be due to the fact that she just had a child, hello anybody.

    And on his behalf it's called sympathy gain

  • If you came up to me to reprimand me for doing what is natural, and for doing what heterosexuals take for granted, you'd get punched in the face.

  • "If you came up to me to reprimand me for doing what is natural, and for doing what heterosexuals take for granted, you'd get punched in the face"

    Then I would proceed in breaking every bone in your body.

    A verbal attack is one thing but when you attack me physically you better kill me.

  • You're not man enough.

  • "You're not man enough."

    On the contrary, you're the one trying to be a female, ROFLMBO

  • Funny when Christians have an issue they call it something else ,,like "Sympathy gain". Fat is fat! Its like calling stealing ok when you "need " something" You Christian crack me up! LOL

  • "Funny when Christians have an issue they call it something else ,,like "Sympathy gain""

    And Your ignorance blinds you from facts but of course you've never had a wife that's been pregnant so I wouldn't expect you to comprehend, lol. It's proven fathers get sypathy gain because they eat whenever she eats so he too eats more.

    "You Christian crack me up! LOL "

    Just pure ignorant to the highest digree that's not a Christian thing thats a world thing.

    Go educate yourself and look it up

  • Dream, I have 100% straight male & female friends, plus 3 brothers and all have kids and not a one of the men gained weight, and the women lost theirs quickly by going to the gym etc. Its called Education.

  • "and the women lost theirs quickly by going to the gym"

    And so did she you foo, that image was taken shortly thereafter her son was born.

    If you had a real education you would know the MAJORITY of married couples go through this not everyone will but the majoirty yes.

    **sigh** Your stupidity is giving me a headache just horrible, too bad you had to drop so low to start making insults and towards the wrong person's picture, lol.

    I'm out

  • Kraize, obesisty rates are among the poor and uneducated and the Highly religious are the least educated in America. Deal with the fact,,,stop bringining me folklore.

  • "and the Highly religious are the least educated in America."

    That's a major fallacy, my Uncle, the oastor, is over payrol for the district and pulls in over $8,000 a month, several of my cousing go to Cal State San Bernardino, and I'm a full time, college, married person that's giving you a run for your money on this topic.

    "Deal with the fact,,,stop bringining me folklore."

    That's no where near fact it's garbage.

    Gonna have fun with Grand Theft Auto 4 for a long time.

    pathetic

  • The great majority of atheists I have known think Christians, particularly of the fundamentalist variety, are stupid. Why? Because Christians subscribe to beliefs that are patently absurd. I am often tempted, due to my experiences in speaking with them, to agree. However, Christians shouldn't complain. If atheists think the Christers are stupid, it's because the Christers have only themselves to thank.

  • The atheists have proven themselves the stupid ones anyway.

  • Oh really? Atheists subscribe to science and philosophy. Science and philosophy pose questions that may never be answered; religion has answers that may never be questioned. Atheists, as a rule, are intellectually honest; Christians are intellectually dishonest. Anyone who believes the Bible or the Qur'an is the inspired, infallible word of God has rocks in his head.

  • Are you really that blind to believe that all this universe exists due to sheer chance? That the laws of physics are just happened to work in our favor? Anybody who believes this has nothing in their head. Atheists are the intellectually dishonest ones, they lie about their intent, and try to turn people away from a healthy belief.

    "A little philosophy inclineth man's mind to atheism, but depth in philosophy bringeth men's minds about to religion. - Sir Francis Bacon"

  • "Atheists subscribe to science and philosophy."

    Science is far from perfect, LMAO there have been very tragic things that have happened because of science.

    And Philosophy is nothing but human ideology and ways of life, we are imperfect and subject to break down and fail.

    Many people have ideas that don't pan out.

    "Atheists, as a rule, are intellectually honest"

    That's a fallacy, they still can't explain how the materials formed to cause the big bang

  • Atheists don't pretend to know for sure in areas where Christians are cocksure. That is why atheists have the upper edge in intellectual matters. The beauty of science is that it rectifies itself. It's open to revision in the face of new evidence. Religion is fixed, born of fear in primitive times when men had little understanding of the workings of their environments, based on the hunger to find explanations for their existence.

  • "you'd get punched in the face"

    BTW that's a very peaceful and intelligent way to settle something isn't it.

    Just like you kats put you morals with that of the animal kingdom, so do your physical emotions dwell as well, lol

  • It's a gut level reaction against putting down someone's sexuality. Sometimes that works best. It's no different than going up to a miscegenistic couple and telling them that the races were not meant to mix.

  • "It's a gut level reaction against putting down someone's sexuality."

    No that's an animalistic reaction for I can shoot you down with my words alone.

    "It's no different than going up to a miscegenistic couple and telling them that the races were not meant to mix. "

    That's another fallacy, I don't have to revert to violence when someone calls me a nigger either but I see when it comes to yo violence is on your mind for any and everything you animal, lol

  • Flux of redefinition? Marriage in the western sense has ALWAYS been between a man and a woman.

  • Not necessarily. Ancient Mediterranean cultures have legalized it. Gay marriage was legal for aristocrats under the pagan Roman Empire. Tasmanians used to recognized them. The North American natives also recognized them.

    Marrying for love and allowing people to choose their own mates is an American idea. Common law marriage was the norm among the peasantry of medieval Europe. It was illegal for members of two different races almost everywhere to marry. The structure of marriage changes.

  • "Ancient Mediterranean cultures have legalized it."

    And you were around living, breathing and walking to know this huh? Or did it come from a text book without proof.

    "It was illegal for members of two different races almost everywhere to marry"

    The broken thing in that argument is that there is only one race, the human race.

    "Newton is using the Aquinas argument, which was blown to smithereens by Russell. "

    False

  • Morbid and unhealthy? People should not go around shouting about their sexuality. The fact that they are so "proud" of being gay is morbid and unhealthy. We don't do straight pride parades!

    I am never going to get used to and accept such disrespectful and tasteless behavior. All the gay pride nutjobs are doing is pissing people off. The ACLU won't defend my opinion like it defends yours but I am stilled going to say it!

    I suppose you believe the "don't ask, don't tell" policy is wrong too?

  • The ACLU won't defend your opinions, but it will defend your right to EXPRESS your opinions. Great difference.

    Heterosexuals parade their sexualities all the time, from Bravo, MTV, Playboy, wedding ceremonies, the list is endless.

    Only a tiny handful of countries ban gays from their militaries. The truth of the matter is that gays who serve do so very well. The most highly decorated woman in American history is a lesbian. The real issue is America's homophobia.

  • "Heterosexuals parade their sexualities all the time, from Bravo, MTV, Playboy, wedding ceremonies, the list is endless."

    No thats advertisding sin (fornication) and advertising fashion knuckle head.

    "The real issue is America's homophobia."

    That's right blame it on all of the normal people and up-hold twisted thinking and imoral lifestyles.

    Let's also support the right to marry multiple people wile we're at it

  • There are millions of people, that is, people with a higher sense of morality, who do not accept the belief that homosexuality is morally wrong. There is no sound basis on which to declare it wrong. To say "the Bible says so" is to say nothing.

    I'm not going to blame homosexuals for YOUR homophobia. All the hostility and discrimination is not a situation gays have created. Neither do they deserve it. Yes, I'm blaming the "normal" people. Your side is the sick side, the ones with the problem.

  • "There are millions of people, that is, people with a higher sense of morality, who do not accept the belief that homosexuality is morally wrong"

    Fallacy, there are famous and very intellectual people that know the foul deeds of homosexuality

    "There is no sound basis on which to declare it wrong."

    We've stated soo much sound evidence and reason it's not funny

    "To say "the Bible says so" is to say nothing. "

    Your opinion not fact, the FACT remains it stands the test of time.

  • "Fallacy, there are famous and very intellectual people that know the foul deeds of homosexuality"

    Then let these persons of "intellectual power" describe homosexuality's fould deeds. They can't do it.

    "We've stated soo much sound evidence and reason it's not funny"

    What you call evidence is mere prejudice. You could admit it if you had an open mind.

    "Your opinion not fact"

    In that case, show me where the Bible explains why it's wrong. Give me your irrational drivel.

  • "We don't do straight pride parades!"

    Straight people have never needed a parade because they have never been marginalized or oppressed, jackass.

    How the fuck are gay pride parades, or queer people in general, affecting your life negatively?

  • So that is an excuse to behave childishly? I bet you want reparations too. People just don't like seeing immoral behavior in public you jackass. They are affecting my life negatively by making their own business the public's agenda. Look at the way they try to redefine marriage and force society to accept and support them!

  • Who is behaving childishly? And who is talking about reparations? Being queer and proud of it is not an immoral act. No one is getting hurt. You can't claim something is immoral just because you don't like it.

    Their own business is part of the public discourse because, guess what, they are part of the public.

    And by the way, gay marriage has been around longer than Christianity, so maybe you should think about who is forcing their opinions on who.

  • You are behaving childishly with this "gay pride" nonsense. It is an immoral act and it is idiotic to make a public display of ones "sexual orientation".

    The fact that they are gay should not be part of public discourse. They should keep their sex lives to themselves just as most of society does. It is as simple as that. The funny thing is that if somebody tried to do a straight pride parade special interests groups and idiots like yourself would attack it as discrimination.

  • America was built on Western culture and values, including the historic Christian definition of marriage. The Christian concept of "marriage" is not unique to Christianity anyway. Similar concepts have been around a long time in many different cultures too.

    You are trying to redefine marriage into something other than what it has historically been in our society and most of the world.

    The fact that you insist on marriage instead of civil unions which make a degree of sense is pathetic.

  • "You can't claim something is immoral just because you don't like it."

    You can claim something is immoral if you have logical, and scientific evidence against it.

  • "You can't claim something is immoral just because you don't like it."

    You can claim something is immoral if you have logical, and scientific evidence against it.

    "And by the way, gay marriage has been around longer than Christianity"

    homosexuality wasn't around before living a life that god commanded though so what's your point.

    You should really stick to a secular battle because a religious one may not work in your favor

  • "Look at the way they try to redefine marriage and force society to accept and support them!"

    you can say that again and the ironic thing about it is most homosexuals don't even want to get married, only a handful of them do.

  • "How the fuck are gay pride parades, or queer people in general, affecting your life negatively?"

    When they openly are nasty which a lot of them are in the public, it disgusts me and several others especially in front of kids, hell nah.

    I'll approach you and ask you to stop.

  • There is nothing nastier, and more disgusting, than a bigot who demonizes homosexuals in the name of Christ. In fact, it's people with your despicable mentality that inspire these parades in the first place. If homosexuality was completely accepted like it should be, the pride parades would lose their incentive and disappear. You show very little insight into anything at all, and if you did have insight, it would work against you.

  • "There is nothing nastier, and more disgusting, than a bigot who demonizes homosexuals in the name of Christ."

    I demonize homosexuality not homosexuals, get it right you foo.

    Everything you've said has been combated and is straight garbage, just show me where in the constitution separation of church and state is, stop getting around it find it or admit it's not there, period.

    Can't respond to all of your nonsense got a game to play

  • "I demonize homosexuality not homosexuals"

    Dear idiot, how do you demonize the former without demonizing the latter? And what valid grounds do you have for demoninizing the former? Absolutely none, because what I said before, gay sex per se is not an indication of a person's moral character. Sex is an emotional and biological need, and to say that gays must forfeit that is cruel and just plain stupid.

    Does David Barton decide for you what Amendment #1 means? It means what it says.

  • "Dear idiot, how do you demonize the former without demonizing the latter?"

    The obvious idiot here is YOU homosexuality is the lifestyle homosexual is the person living the lifestyle you imbecile.

    "Sex is an emotional and biological need, and to say that gays must forfeit that is cruel and just plain stupid."

    No one said not to have sex, no one cares what nasty things you kats do in private, but we fight to keep a real definition for marriage.

    "It means what it says."

    Where does it say!!!!!

  • Poor Krazie, can never admit to being wrong.

    "homosexual is the person living the lifestyle you imbecile."

    Let's see. There is the academic lifestyle, the athletic lifestyle, the jet set lifestyle, the reclusive lifestyle, the barfly lifestyle and a myriad of other lifestyles. What lifestyle are to talking about? Because any of them may be inhabited by a homosexual, that makes it immoral? You ARE daft!

    Name me one homosexual sex act that heterosexuals don't engage in. You can't do it.

  • Jesus Christ and all of his deciples, we'll never get an answer on the claims of seperate but equal.

    It's ok if you were wrong, you can admit defeat like a real man, be a big boy and do yourself a favor:

    GROW UP!!!

  • You're perennially notorious for your psychological projection. You're the one who's determined to not change your mind, but I am the adamant one? You argue not to weigh the pros and cons, but to preserve what you want to believe. I looked at your side of the issue for a long time, often, and it doesn't pass muster. That's okay. Projection is expected from you. It's more than just a characteristic of the prejudiced personality, it's central to it. Try and get a clue!

  • Jesus Can I please get an answer, can you answer the question, do you have the answer, please state the answer.

    ANSWER ANSWER ANSWER!!!!!!

  • "ANSWER ANSWER ANSWER!!!!!!"

    I have a framed Constitution on the living room wall. Read the First Amendment! I'm not your baby sitter. I know what you're going to say once I answer that question. It's meaning is self-evident. You tell ME what the First Amendment means. If you think you can paint me into a corner, think again.

    It's a gorgeous day and I'm heading out, so don't expect an immediate reply.

  • "I am sick and tired of this special treatment."

    You and I both

  • Let me ask my fellow citizens of Connecticut...

    Why have elections when we have such wise rulers in robes?

    For the sake of Democracy, and to stand against this bullshit attempt to redefine marriage lets overturn this! If the people agree lets give them civil unions.

  • Civil unions is another term for second-class citizenship. Further, you don't seem to grasp the difference between democracy and liberty. If the people vote to ban gay marriage, that's democracy in action, but it's also an infringement on the liberties of the minority. The very concept of civil rights exists because majorities tend to get abusive toward minorities.

    I'm proud of Connecticut. This will go down in history as that state being more advanced than most other states.

  • Are you insane? You already have the same exact rights as everybody else including the right to a real marriage. The fact that you will never use that is not the governments problem.

    When the people allow civil unions rights normally associated with marriage are being extended to you. That is not "second-class citizenship".

    A more advanced state?

    Clearly we are when the great judges decide everything for us! Corruption is everywhere and the gay pride nuts are out in force!

  • If you marry someone you're not in love with, and not attracted to, how can it be a real marriage? You set up heterosexual marriage as the ideal. But if a certain path in life doesn't respond to your predilections, your innermost needs and desires, how can it be an ideal?

    Civil unions is second-class citizenship no matter how you phrase it. It's saying that gay people are not worthy of marriage.

    Yes, those who support gay marriage are more advanced. Their morals are higher.

  • "If you marry someone you're not in love with, and not attracted to, how can it be a real marriage?"

    Don;t get married.

    "You set up heterosexual marriage as the ideal."

    That could be bacuase that's the way it was from gate.

    "It's saying that gay people are not worthy of marriage."

    and they aren't

    "Yes, those who support gay marriage are more advanced. Their morals are higher."

    ROFLMBO, lol, hahahaha I'm dying of laughter

  • Your response doesn't apply. Ideals are ALWAYS subjective. Ayn Rand had a vision of the "ideal" man, whereas to me and countless others, her "ideal" is monstrous.

    You can't define an ideal for those who are not satisfied, fulfilled, and uninspired.

    "Don;t get married."

    This reveals more than you realize. The fair treatment, the needs of human beings take a back seat to entrenched beliefs. That is what's wrong with conservatives.

  • "All the hostility and discrimination is not a situation gays have created."

    I fear no homosexual as I don;t have a PHOBIA towards them and second who's being hostile, I love how you robots automatically jump to calling people hostile, hateful, and homophobic, I beg you to grow up it helps in life.

    "Your side is the sick side, the ones with the problem. "

    That's right 80% of the world is sick religious and non-religious, ROFLMBO you've got issues you need to work out

  • "I fear no homosexual as I don;t have a PHOBIA"

    Your are indeed homophobic. You admitted yourself that you don't want gay couples holding hands in front of your children. That's homophobia. I DO want my kids to see this because it teaches them that it's okay to be different.

    If 99.9% of the entire world is homophobic, it is still sick. All one has to do is delve into the criteria of what constitutes illness. Homosexuality doesn't fit in. Numbers is a logical fallacy.

  • "Clearly we are when the great judges decide everything for us! Corruption is everywhere and the gay pride nuts are out in force! "

    Especially when we the people already decided in prop 22 to ban same sex marriage, I sent Gavin Newsome and the four judges an email and voice mails about themselves.

  • The rights of minorities was never granted through the wills of majorities. In fact, the very concept of civil rights is born out of this fact.

    If "we the people" always had its way, blacks would still be sitting at the back of the bus. When Loving vs Virginia was ruled by the Supreme Court, a set majority opposed the decision. There were more people against interracial marriage in 1968 than there are against gay marriage today.

  • "Ayn Rand had a vision of the "ideal" man, whereas to me and countless others, her "ideal" is monstrous. "

    Would that be to actually be a man instead of a female, lol.

    "You can't define an ideal for those who are not satisfied, fulfilled, and uninspired."

    you mean those who are confused full of excuses, and want special attention and rights.

  • "Would that be to actually be a man instead of a female," lol Rand was sexist.

    No sir! Those who are not satisfied, fulfilled, and uninspired. There is no such thing as a special right. Gays already get lots of attention just for being gay. In the firm I worked for, one gay man disclosed his orientation in private to one individual. An eavesdropper who wasn't noticed spread the word around. The news spread like wildfire. "He's gay! He's gay!" A few guys started taunting him.

  • "The rights of minorities was never granted through the wills of majorities."

    No it was based on income, political power, and living situations along with several other factors why you kats were DENIED

    "If "we the people" always had its way, blacks would still be sitting at the back of the bus."

    False if it weren't for we the people whites and blacks we wouldn't have rights.

  • You can never admit to being on the wrong side of the fence, or being wrong in any manner, shape, or form. Your responses are always pusillaminous. And often made up as you go along.

    Civil rights are not denied, and never meant to be denied, on the basis of income. One of the propaganda ploys is that gays are not entitled to their rights because their incomes on the average are much higher. Not according to the study held by the University of Maryland.

  • "If the people agree lets give them civil unions."

    I'll agree to that

  • WOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

  • Yes to gay marriage!

  • NO IT SHOULDN'T MARICON

  • STFU

  • no its not

  • Sorry if i offend gay people but i gotta say this

    WTF is wrong with AMERICA why the hell are they legalizing gay marriage, i dont hate gay people but marriage is only between a man and a woman and and anything else is morally wrong. And if gay marriage is legalized throughout America then its going to be a REALLY GAY COUNTRY and not even Mexicans are gonna want to come to the US.

  • Sorry if I offend you, but I got to say this;

    You are more than slightly paranoid.

  • You used my line... but seriously GAY MARRIAGE SHOULD BE ILLEGAL... those African countries are handling it well they are beheading gays lol

    The american people have lost their morals what a shame...

  • You should be illegal. The recognition of gay marriage is morality in progress. I could explain why, but by your tone, I doubt if it would sink in. The next time you respond to one of my comments, try to use intelligence.  Your comment says nothing about homosexuality and gay marriage, but speaks volumes about the ignorant, depraved person you are.

  • Gay marriage is immoral, wrong, and certainly not supported by the Constitution despite what some think. Simply put there is no good reason for the United States to change our traditional definition of marriage.

    What has happened in Connecticut, my home state was not because the people agreed. It was because idiotic liberal judges made the call.

  • I can't comment on the Connecticut Constitution, but on the federal level, the banning of it violates four amendments: separation of church and state, due process, enumerated rights, and equal treatment under the laws. Gay marriage is wrong under YOUR religion, but there are millions who disagree. I contend that it's a mark of progress. SCOTUS has ruled twice that marriage is a basic civil right (Loving vs Virginia, Skinner vs Oklahoma). Rights cannot be arbitrarily applied.

  • There is no amendment stating a seperation of church and state. What is pretty much stated is that the government will stay out of the church's business and will not pass laws preventing the freedom to practice one's religion. This does not mean we are not a Christian nation and we can't have "In God we Trust." on the dollar bill like some insist.

    Regardless gays have the same rights as everybody else, including a right to marriage, yet don't have control over what marriage is.

  • There is indeed a separation of church and state. On record are various writings by Jefferson and Madison, explaining precisely what the First Amendment means. You have been duped by religious right rhetoric that is trying to revise history. David Barton is the creationist of American history, a fraud who has been debunked by experts. Also, some of the Founding Fathers are on record as saying that we were NOT founded as a Christian nation, and that includes George Washington.

  • "Also, some of the Founding Fathers are on record as saying that we were NOT founded as a Christian nation"

    They weren't but the PEOPLE were that's who runs the country the people vote, not government nor do four founding fathers, another tacky approach.

  • The first five presidents were not Christians.

    Have you read Tocqueville? According to him, everyone. that is, THE PEOPLE, he met was in strong favor of the separation of church and state, even the pastors. He said he never met an American who was against it. I read the entire massive book, Democracy in America. You should read it too. You have lots to learn. Yet he found religious devotion to be quite high, more than any place in Europe.

  • "There is no amendment stating a seperation of church and state"

    Thank you, i can't stress how many times I've had to educate people myself about that

    "Regardless gays have the same rights as everybody else, including a right to marriage"

    I've stressed that as well

  • "There is no amendment stating a seperation of church and state"

    "Thank you, i can't stress how many times I've had to educate people myself about that"

    Having you as a teacher is like sending a Jew to a Nazi. You stress wrongly.

  • Like I was saying, gays do not have the right to decide what marriage is.

    Connecticut already had civil unions provding all of the rights of marriage before this. What has happened is an injustice against the people of this state. An attempt to force society to approve of and support gays. A decision forced upon us by our idiotic liberal courts who will make you rich if you spill hot food and burn yourself.

  • So you're trying to place "the majority" as victims of injustice? How Orwellian of you. This is just excuse mongering. You know perfectly well that it's gays who have been traditionally forced into pretending to be someone else. Fearing a group of people, or seeing it as a threat, no matter how illusive, always translates into the deprivation of civil rights and other indignities. You have lost NOTHING with gay marriage. There is no conflict here with the stability of society.

  • "You know perfectly well that it's gays who have been traditionally forced into pretending to be someone else"

    You don;t have to pretend to be a man because you are a man pretending to be a woman, lol you're confusing yourself.

    "You have lost NOTHING with gay marriage. There is no conflict here with the stability of society."

    WE have given plenty to disprove that statement including homosexuals slapping millions of churches in the face for being humble to their beliefs denying services.

  • Rubbish. Homosexuality is not about gender confusion or gender transference. Gay men and lesbians know what sex they are without difficulty. Just another baseless prejudice on your part.

    Like always, you are wrong. Gay marriage, and marriage in general, is a civil contract. No churches are forced to recognize them, even though they would improve if they did. Banning gay marriage takes away the rights of churches that DO accept gay marriage, like the Unitarian Church just down the street.

  • Your advanced Court's decision means that you can't decide for others how they're going to conduct their lives. If the pursuit of happiness means anything, it means settling down with someone you're in love with.

    This tendency to denounce liberalism in this culture makes me vomit. The Founding Fathers were liberals, the Constitution is a liberal document, liberalism is the basic American principle. The courts, education, are better off when in the hands of liberals.

  • "This tendency to denounce liberalism in this culture makes me vomit."

    liberalism itself makes me vomit, lets let everyone and everything do what the heck they wan't. If a womam opens her legs and screws everybody and gets pregnant lets allow a way for her to destroy a life (MURDER) and get out of her responsibilities, give me a break/

    "the Constitution is a liberal document"

    The constitution is a FAIR document and laws have been added throughout the years it wasn't perfect from gate

  • Women get abortions for a variety of reasons. It's not your place to decide for others how they're too exercise their individual consciences. The fetus is a glob of tissue; the synappses of the brain are not connected until it reaches the second trimester. It's a vegetable with no sensations.

    Yes, the Constitution is a fair document, so why do oppose fairness for gay people? BTW, fairness is one of the basic tenants of liberalism. If that makes you vomit, then see a doctor.

  • "What has happened is an injustice against the people of this state"

    Of course because if we left it up to the people good things would happen and a few raggedy judges along with radical homosexuals cannot allow good things to happen, lol

  • If Jesus doesn't allowed me in heaven because I am gay, why does that bother you?

  • "the banning of it violates four amendments: separation of church and state"

    Please, I beg you, show us where the amendment is on separation of church and state.

    When you find those words, holla back.

    "Gay marriage is wrong under YOUR religion"

    Do you know how many non-religious people are against it as well, bad excuse buddy.

    "Rights cannot be arbitrarily applied. "

    The shoe fits your group oh so well

  • If you deny the separation of church and state, that could mean that you've been subjected to the revisionist history of David Barton. This denial has a political motive. Jefferson, in his own writings, and to a letter to Danbury Baptists, explained succintly what the First Amendment means, and he specially used the phrase "church and state" James Madison, in his writings, also explained the meaning of the amendment, and used the phrase "separation of religion and government."

  • We should behead everyone we disagree with. I AGREE lets start with the gays&lesbians and move onto the blacks then the women.. Lets make hate a family value once again

  • Congratulations!!! Much love to everyone working for full equal rights for EVERYONE

  • "The lack of integrity in your community, specifically the constant validation and discrediting of ideas for speculated argumentative advantage at any moment, is only making you look foolish and uninterested in reality."

    The problem with the statement is everything you've said has been shot down.

    You're boring me with your lack of evidence and futile thinking.

    it's 3:08 in the morning, I'm hittin the sack, out!

  • Go listen to any christian argument through history. From the world being at the center of the universe, slavery/war/genocide justifications, 'evidence' for creationism, the anti-homosexual crusade ......... You are as wishy-washy as they come, often changing complete areas of thought even mid-sentance.

    "your lack of evidence"

    You have not supplied me with a single shred of evidence as to why homosexuals should be denied their rights. Stop being such a hypocrite.

  • "slavery/war/genocide justifications"

    Please tell me you think the Bible supports this for us because I'd love to school you on the difference between the MOSAIC LAWS and the laws of the New Testament, big difference.

    "You are as wishy-washy as they come, often changing complete areas of thought even mid-sentance."

    Nope I just have the ability to dip into scriptural reference and secular reference

  • I had hoped that you would have supplied me with at least some indication of the motives, or at least justification, for your beliefs ... but all I got was worthless stereotypes and disturbingly childish complaints. You have a kind persona, but your ruthless inhumanity and almost flawless arrogance is something you are going to have to answer for eventually. You have sold your soul for a scapegoat.

  • With that I leave you though. I am not going to waste any more of my time talking to someone incapable of bringing to light even their own arguments, not to mention a contribution to the larger debate as a whole.

    I will thank you for again showing me the lengths people will go to to justify their previously held prejudices though; it always surprises me how in love people are with their hatred (especially when they find support in it), and how desperately they long to control others.

  • Oops ... I used my other account (to comment on musical performances, humerous videos, etc). Sorry about that (though it should be quite obvious I imagine).

  • "your ruthless inhumanity and almost flawless arrogance is something you are going to have to answer for eventually. You have sold your soul for a scapegoat."

    inhumanity, I've never treated homosexuals with any disrespect physically or mentally nor will I have to answer to what has already been written

    "I am not going to waste any more of my time talking to someone incapable of bringing to light even their own arguments, not to mention a contribution to the larger debate as a whole."

    yourself

  • When you advocate the treating of gay people as second class citizens, you are showing disrepect, and there's no way you can worm your way out of it.

  • "When you advocate the treating of gay people as second class citizens"

    Too bad that's not what I'm doing.

    "It's an old story brought on by paranoid reactionaries lacking in knowledge and understanding of a changing society."

    Yes a change that involves more sluts and trashy women than ever before and men that are like females and can;t support a family, great change, lol

    "Teachers are supposed to be inordinantly knowledgable."

    They are to teach reading writing and math, period

  • Krazie, you say you are not treating gay people as second-class citizens. Sorry bub, but the emperor has no clothes and there's no point in debating with you what is patently obvious.

    "They are to teach reading writing and math, period"

    No sir! Those are the tools by which education is acquired. Reading, writing, and math is not education; they are skills.

  • "it always surprises me how in love people are with their hatred"

    Just like all of the other robots automatically jumping to the conclusion someone is hating just for dissagreeing, grow up please.

    "and how desperately they long to control others."

    I could care less what people do as long as our rights aren't tampered with so again false.

  • "People think they present arguments when what they're doing is really rearranging their prejudices." ---Edward R. Murrow

    This is a critique of Krazie, not you.

  • "You have not supplied me with a single shred of evidence as to why homosexuals should be denied their rights. Stop being such a hypocrite. "

    I've given plenty, especially all of the true reasons why they want same sex marriage ok'd while most homosexuals don't even want to get married.

    "but all I got was worthless stereotypes and disturbingly childish complaints."

    What stereotypes?

  • Yay for gay couples! I hope they stay GAY!

    And by gay, I mean happy. LOL :}

  • I don't understand why this bothers people so much. People don't choose to be gay. If government is going to be involved in marriage, then they have a responsibility to offer it to everyone. You don't have to acknowledge it and neither does your church.

    Those people who get married 5 times bother me a lot more.

  • "If government is going to be involved in marriage, then they have a responsibility to offer it to everyone."

    Umm... Last I checked it is available to everyone this isn't an equal rights issue because we all already have equal marriage rights.

  • Ummm... no we don't.

  • Yes you do, we ALL have the right to marry a qualified individual of the opposite sex, that's an equal right genius, anything other than that is an extra special right and the government doesn't have to make rights based off of feelings.