Thanks for making this video and explaining things about your stabilizer very well!! Ive been working on my own and what you said about where the gimbal is located and weight below=weight above fulcrum finally helped me to get it set up correctly. Now it works super awesome :)
Hey, thanks a lot for taking your time to create and share this. I've been wanting something like this for my Canon T2i for some time now and I thought it would be perhaps a bit beyond my ability to DIY. Thanks to this video, I think I can actually do it fairly well. Nice work! :-)
@NightRunner417 If I were to do it again, I might look for something a little heavier than the Traxxas model mentioned. It works, but could be a hair beefier.
@sprattoo Good to know, because lol I was really close to going for it. I don't suppose you'd have any suggestions? If I do this, I'll be using it for my Canon T2i with a fairly heavy lens and I'll want it to have the security of a strong gimbal.
@NightRunner417 I don't have a suggestion, but if you can find a local hobby shop dealing in R/C parts, they probably will come up with something. It's just a drive shaft Ujoint I think
@4Firearms Yup, but anyone with a handycam... probably not. Nor do the students I attend production classes with, nor do most Indy film makers, nor do.... a long list of folks.
@4Firearms even people who make a living on photography and video enjoy not spending $800 if they can make something that works as well. just fyi. ESPECIALLY to most people who do this for a living, that's a decent chunk of change. that's a new lens, or a year's worth of marketing, or rent...
WRONG. If professionals showed up with that piece of metal to shoot a high budget video they would never work for that client again. IMAGE is a lot of what sells clients.
You can't charge $15,000 bucks for a commercial and then show up with tiny cameras and chunks of metal and expect to ever be taken seriously.
TRUST ME! I know. I've worked in the industry for nearly 20 years at all levels.
@4Firearms if you've been in the industry so long you'd know specialty equipment doesn't start out in mass production, it's made by specialists; read hand built equipment. ever used apple boxes? i didnt say anything about tiny cameras and chunks of metal. a respectable pro will know they need something that is sturdy, reliable, and well constructed. that doesn't necessarily mean you're buying it from b&h. and if you're a seasoned pro, why are you watching a diy steadicam video?
Make me one. I'll give you $20 CAD (shipping handling included). Paypal. It should be generic enough to fit a smart phone (i Phone) as well as the Sony DV cam.
1:57 ".. and why that happens is" - because its not perfectly balanced. It should be the same regardless of length of frame, if the balance is spot on!
@Detjo I think you are right. The pro versions are much longer in length.
I aim for a shorter frame because of weight mostly.
In retrospect I do mis-speak a couple of theories here and there... this video has a little age on it. Maybe I need a new one... hrmm... one more thing on the TO-DO list.
where is the 5/16 bolt/ steel i'm confused what you welded the top of the 1/4 bolt to. also is that 2 washers at the top of the traxxas joint near the cam?
@mechamegalodon95 I welded the heads of the two bolts together. This isn't always necessary, I only did it because that was where this particular cam happenned to balance. You could just drill 2 different hole fore and aft of one another depending on the camera balance point.
I put a washer on the 1/4x20 side as a spacer so the threads wouldn't run too deep into the camera. if you cut it short, it also wouldn't be necessary.
The sample was actually filmed with a different prototype that was a dash too heavy on the bottom (thus the rocking)
I was under the gun to turn in a produced piece for the local TV station in a hurry, and instead of loading / unloading more video, I just stuck with what I had.
@theflightsimmer147 Yes, I'm afraid so, my apologies for the low def. My upload speed is painfully slow, and was even worse when this video went up, so I had to trim it to the minimums just to not tie my computer up for a day.
Thanks for your very clear explanation. I'm trying to build something like this for an iPhone 4S, which has an amazing HD video camera in it, but needs some stabilization. I'm using a strip of aluminum (idea borrowed from branliew here on YouTube), for lightness and easy bendability. I'm using your gimbal design. Not quite sure yet how to mount the iPhone onto the bar, but I'm waiting for a car-phone holder to arrive from Amazon. This is a nice design with a very helpful explanatory video.
That is a very nice design at an affordable price. However, I need to correct you on the physics of why you say the small frame is better because of less drag. It has nothing to do with the space or size of arc. It has to do with the weight of everything balanced between an imaginary line running vertically through your gimble point. If you had the same design you have now and added more weight some how to the bottom, it would drag also. It all has to do with a slightly bottom heavy design
@slambo239 You are right. It has to do with the fulcrum. This full video was a 30 minute show, and the initial prototype was made of plywood. It was a flat and wide bit and was catching "wind" or more precisely was experiencing air resistance during quick movements.
@sprattoo I know what you mean. When i have my LCD screen swung out, the same thing happens to me. I have read where that is a limitation to these types of steadicams and there is nothing we can really do about it. It is not one of those huge double spring arm rigs so we work with what we got. Running is also something that these types of Merlin rigs is very limited in doing. Since we do not have the spring arm system, we do not have a way of isolating the vertical movement on the Y axis.
@spetznas37@spetznas37 I considered it but no, I'm sorry I don't. Mostly because each individual frame needs to be balanced specifically for each individual camera model.
Welding the two bolts together becomes unnecessary if your camera balances differently. (depending on where the 1/4x20 bolt hole is.)
To battle this I would need to machine in a groove to slide the cam fore and aft. (Tools I don't have)
I have all I can do to keep up with internet orders from mainetackle -dot- com
nice design, but the sample footage still seems to suffer some wawing and wobbling, just exactly the things you said to avoid. Maybe at that time it was not perfectly balanced?
@hpept you are absolutely right. When I grabbed that sample footage I was still a little heavy on the bottom. Instead of re-filming the new result etc.. I just went with what I had. I was under a deadline to put parts of this on local public access TV.
@hpept You are straight on the money. That was a very first run with the cam, I was still a tad heavy on the bottom end with that footage.
This show was initially shot to air on public access and I had a deadline to meet, with about 100 other projects, and just grabbed video of what I had on hand at like 1:00 AM during editing instead of waiting and re-filming and editing the next day (when it needed to be in)
@openuniverse2003 If you balance it correctly IE just BARELY enough weight for the frame to slowly right itself, it works quite well.
Keep in mind though it's still an 8 or 10 rig so maybe it doesn't do everything an $800 Merlin would do, but it comes pretty dang close, because the same physics are at play.
you hit the spot with that steadycam makes those who buy a 800 dollar one look like damn stupid, I prefer you steady cam than those who are just ripping us off with their so call pro steady cam.
This is pretty impressive but I would never trust my DSLR on something I put together on my own. I've been using the Cam Caddie Scorpion going for about $38 on Amazon and it's improved every single shot I've taken since I bought it. I recommend it to anyone seeking an independent setup.
I think it is a brilliant design, but I don't think I can build it. Can you build one and sell it to me? I can send a check. I really like how small and light you've built this.
You know the footage of the man at the pond...this is wonderful. It would be neat to overlay some audio of him talking about the good ole days and relating some stores, etc. thanks! ~aubie
always wanted to visit New Hampshire...live free or die! that's gotta be the best motto
So many people run immediately to the store to before they start any project. Look around you a little first.
The average Facebook user has 130 friends. Post what you are looking for, or are doing. Of those 130 immediate friends who have 130 friends each (avg) there has to be a welder in those 16,900 connections!
Or WHATEVER you are looking for.
Use your resources, transfer station, recycling center, and networks with a positive can-do attitude and everything will come together.
The issue with this is the title. this is NOT an 8 dollar steadicam. It cost you 8 bucks because you had the good fortune to know a welder AND had some spare metal laying around. this is easily a 50 dollar project.
I think "Merlin Steadicam for $8.00 easy!" describes what I did.
And I also suggest offering a local auto shop the services of filming an advert or video in trade for tacking 2 bolts together. (which would make it free)
Also Scouring a transfer station will most likely yield a steel bar from a chain link fence.
@sprattoo i'm not trying to be mean. just realistic. most people won't do this. i made a steady cam too for about 10 bucks, but i was able to do it without welders or something out of the way. the fact that you have to weld something together or find someone to weld something together for you will be a major hindrance.
@lemoni1982 I understand that. Some cameras balance different too. The weld was only necessary for my particular Cam.
having both bolts in the same place (for handle and cam mount) can be moved forward or back by adding, removing length and altering the bend of the bar and balance weight. I opted for the weld to minimize on weight and it was an easy solution for me.
Having trouble finding that Sys track u joint 1951. Didn't see it one on Ebay. Where exactly can I get one?
BTW it is important to get your stabilizing weights as far in front and behind as possible. The weight of your spars by comparison to your weights is too much. For dynamic balance the three points of the triangle need to be where all the weight is dispersed.
@steadibaby You put the weights wherever it takes in minimal quanities to balances your rig. The point is to have the drive shaft weight at the center point between top and bottom. Other than that, the back weight only has to match the front side of the curve.
@Johnwells10 When I welded the heads of the bolts together the 1/4 x 20 sticks up on the top. I put a bit of a pad from an old tripod... but any piece of rubber or firm plastic will do, the screw the cam onto the bolt where the mounting hole is in the bottom of the cam
@Johnwells10 happy to share. the key really is to get the pivot point of the handle exactly balanced so when you put the cam at 90 degrees sideways, it just slowly drifts back to upright. Too much bottom weight and it will rock when you move.
Thanks for this video. Your ideas on the balance explained somethings that I've been wondering about. I have a glidecam 2000 and a Steadicam JR and I'm thaiking of building my own unit as neither of the work well with me canon 5d.
@joshdoube thanks Josh. I watched your video quite a few times.... and many others before I started building. There were other prototypes before this one, but nothing worked as well, or was as cheap.
Thanks for making this video and explaining things about your stabilizer very well!! Ive been working on my own and what you said about where the gimbal is located and weight below=weight above fulcrum finally helped me to get it set up correctly. Now it works super awesome :)
bryantwc123 1 day ago
thanks for the tutorial!
hardlyscope 5 days ago
genius!
CarOnTheWall 6 days ago
Very impressive steadicam, it works well. I like it
fostina05 2 weeks ago
Hey, thanks a lot for taking your time to create and share this. I've been wanting something like this for my Canon T2i for some time now and I thought it would be perhaps a bit beyond my ability to DIY. Thanks to this video, I think I can actually do it fairly well. Nice work! :-)
NightRunner417 2 weeks ago
@NightRunner417 If I were to do it again, I might look for something a little heavier than the Traxxas model mentioned. It works, but could be a hair beefier.
sprattoo 2 weeks ago
@sprattoo Good to know, because lol I was really close to going for it. I don't suppose you'd have any suggestions? If I do this, I'll be using it for my Canon T2i with a fairly heavy lens and I'll want it to have the security of a strong gimbal.
NightRunner417 2 weeks ago
@NightRunner417 But one that moves nicely... and one that looks nice... and isn't too expensive...
NightRunner417 2 weeks ago
@NightRunner417 I don't have a suggestion, but if you can find a local hobby shop dealing in R/C parts, they probably will come up with something. It's just a drive shaft Ujoint I think
sprattoo 1 week ago
Comment removed
kezzapfk 2 weeks ago
Who has $800 dollars to go buy a REAL piece of video equipment?
Gee, let me think.... Someone who actually makes money with their trade and skill in Video.
4Firearms 2 weeks ago
@4Firearms Yup, but anyone with a handycam... probably not. Nor do the students I attend production classes with, nor do most Indy film makers, nor do.... a long list of folks.
sprattoo 2 weeks ago
@4Firearms besides, when I DO work professionally at the TV station, they have a budget and I have access to their glide cam
sprattoo 2 weeks ago
@4Firearms even people who make a living on photography and video enjoy not spending $800 if they can make something that works as well. just fyi. ESPECIALLY to most people who do this for a living, that's a decent chunk of change. that's a new lens, or a year's worth of marketing, or rent...
CarOnTheWall 6 days ago
@CarOnTheWall
WRONG. If professionals showed up with that piece of metal to shoot a high budget video they would never work for that client again. IMAGE is a lot of what sells clients.
You can't charge $15,000 bucks for a commercial and then show up with tiny cameras and chunks of metal and expect to ever be taken seriously.
TRUST ME! I know. I've worked in the industry for nearly 20 years at all levels.
4Firearms 6 days ago
@4Firearms if you've been in the industry so long you'd know specialty equipment doesn't start out in mass production, it's made by specialists; read hand built equipment. ever used apple boxes? i didnt say anything about tiny cameras and chunks of metal. a respectable pro will know they need something that is sturdy, reliable, and well constructed. that doesn't necessarily mean you're buying it from b&h. and if you're a seasoned pro, why are you watching a diy steadicam video?
CarOnTheWall 6 days ago in playlist Liked videos
@4Firearms also, people who do this for a living and have $800 to spend on a piece of equipment like this don't watch diy videos on youtube.
CarOnTheWall 6 days ago
Make me one. I'll give you $20 CAD (shipping handling included). Paypal. It should be generic enough to fit a smart phone (i Phone) as well as the Sony DV cam.
billboardnumber1 2 weeks ago
1:57 ".. and why that happens is" - because its not perfectly balanced. It should be the same regardless of length of frame, if the balance is spot on!
Detjo 3 weeks ago
@Detjo I think you are right. The pro versions are much longer in length.
I aim for a shorter frame because of weight mostly.
In retrospect I do mis-speak a couple of theories here and there... this video has a little age on it. Maybe I need a new one... hrmm... one more thing on the TO-DO list.
sprattoo 3 weeks ago
great. thanks!!
ecocultura 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thanks a lot!!!
ecocultura 1 month ago
thanks a lot!!!
ecocultura 1 month ago
Yeah you should definitely do a write up.
whtlightnn 1 month ago
Super Stoked To Make This One!!!
lifewithcaleb 1 month ago
I am scared if I make this Merling will sue me, but mybe I sue them instead because this design is better than theirs
reballuk 1 month ago
where is the 5/16 bolt/ steel i'm confused what you welded the top of the 1/4 bolt to. also is that 2 washers at the top of the traxxas joint near the cam?
mechamegalodon95 1 month ago
@mechamegalodon95 I welded the heads of the two bolts together. This isn't always necessary, I only did it because that was where this particular cam happenned to balance. You could just drill 2 different hole fore and aft of one another depending on the camera balance point.
I put a washer on the 1/4x20 side as a spacer so the threads wouldn't run too deep into the camera. if you cut it short, it also wouldn't be necessary.
sprattoo 1 month ago
@mechamegalodon95 Maybe this rig needs a website with some detailed plans...there seems to be a lot of interest in it.
sprattoo 1 month ago
@sprattoo that would be awesome, i really want to make this, i just need some detailed instructions to look at.
mechamegalodon95 1 month ago
the sample video is rocking like you're in a boat. fail.
xxhumblepiexx 1 month ago
@xxhumblepiexx responded to this in earlier posts.
The sample was actually filmed with a different prototype that was a dash too heavy on the bottom (thus the rocking)
I was under the gun to turn in a produced piece for the local TV station in a hurry, and instead of loading / unloading more video, I just stuck with what I had.
Once balanced up, it doesn't sway
sprattoo 1 month ago
people from maine, where lobsters come from, are cheap? lol
marlo916 2 months ago
@marlo916 Yup. Just because we are flocked by tourists, doesn't mean we have $ to blow.
BTW... I pay $2.50 - $4.00 a lb for lobster off the boat, which is cheaper than beef... :/
sprattoo 2 months ago
@sprattoo we are also taxed into oblivion
sprattoo 2 months ago
thanks for the post friend happy christmas
MrEverthere 2 months ago
what song is that?
baileyroche 2 months ago
@baileyroche during the test footage, i mean
baileyroche 2 months ago
@baileyroche not sure. All audio is royalty free, from Incompetech I believe.
sprattoo 2 months ago
@sprattoo found it! You were right -- Incompetech. It's a song called Cattails. I was just really digging it.
baileyroche 2 weeks ago
Super good idea
marcpreschia 2 months ago
@marcpreschia Thanks. I just couldn't justify spending so much cash on steadying a handy cam
sprattoo 2 months ago
that is great, good to know about the traxxas 1951 R/C U joint
wiibart 2 months ago
well...240p we meet again
theflightsimmer147 2 months ago 16
@theflightsimmer147 Yes, I'm afraid so, my apologies for the low def. My upload speed is painfully slow, and was even worse when this video went up, so I had to trim it to the minimums just to not tie my computer up for a day.
sprattoo 2 months ago
Nice job :)
moonbar33 2 months ago
thank you thank you this is exactly what i was looking for trying to figure out something like this great help thanx again kind sir
naillonaaron 2 months ago in playlist GoPro
I live in maine too!
TravisDoyon 2 months ago
Well done... I love it
Tinkerbots 2 months ago
Thanks for your very clear explanation. I'm trying to build something like this for an iPhone 4S, which has an amazing HD video camera in it, but needs some stabilization. I'm using a strip of aluminum (idea borrowed from branliew here on YouTube), for lightness and easy bendability. I'm using your gimbal design. Not quite sure yet how to mount the iPhone onto the bar, but I'm waiting for a car-phone holder to arrive from Amazon. This is a nice design with a very helpful explanatory video.
thewordnerds 3 months ago
all you need just the HD camcorder. Then your picture will be in high definition quality.
hlubtiagproduction 4 months ago
@hlubtiagproduction I have the Sony HDR-FX1. but the size of the camera makes mounting on a steadicam of this small size impossible.
sprattoo 4 months ago
That is a very nice design at an affordable price. However, I need to correct you on the physics of why you say the small frame is better because of less drag. It has nothing to do with the space or size of arc. It has to do with the weight of everything balanced between an imaginary line running vertically through your gimble point. If you had the same design you have now and added more weight some how to the bottom, it would drag also. It all has to do with a slightly bottom heavy design
slambo239 4 months ago
@slambo239 You are right. It has to do with the fulcrum. This full video was a 30 minute show, and the initial prototype was made of plywood. It was a flat and wide bit and was catching "wind" or more precisely was experiencing air resistance during quick movements.
sprattoo 4 months ago
@sprattoo I know what you mean. When i have my LCD screen swung out, the same thing happens to me. I have read where that is a limitation to these types of steadicams and there is nothing we can really do about it. It is not one of those huge double spring arm rigs so we work with what we got. Running is also something that these types of Merlin rigs is very limited in doing. Since we do not have the spring arm system, we do not have a way of isolating the vertical movement on the Y axis.
slambo239 4 months ago
@slambo239 There is a little "forgiveness" if you hold the gimble at a 45 angle.
The spring loaded belted rigs are upwards of $5,000, so yeah there are just some things money CAN buy.
sprattoo 4 months ago
do you sell them?
spetznas37 4 months ago
@spetznas37 @spetznas37 I considered it but no, I'm sorry I don't. Mostly because each individual frame needs to be balanced specifically for each individual camera model.
Welding the two bolts together becomes unnecessary if your camera balances differently. (depending on where the 1/4x20 bolt hole is.)
To battle this I would need to machine in a groove to slide the cam fore and aft. (Tools I don't have)
I have all I can do to keep up with internet orders from mainetackle -dot- com
sprattoo 4 months ago
thanks god, your not kipkay =)
DonaticX 4 months ago
nice design, but the sample footage still seems to suffer some wawing and wobbling, just exactly the things you said to avoid. Maybe at that time it was not perfectly balanced?
hpept 5 months ago
@hpept you are absolutely right. When I grabbed that sample footage I was still a little heavy on the bottom. Instead of re-filming the new result etc.. I just went with what I had. I was under a deadline to put parts of this on local public access TV.
sprattoo 5 months ago
@hpept You are straight on the money. That was a very first run with the cam, I was still a tad heavy on the bottom end with that footage.
This show was initially shot to air on public access and I had a deadline to meet, with about 100 other projects, and just grabbed video of what I had on hand at like 1:00 AM during editing instead of waiting and re-filming and editing the next day (when it needed to be in)
sprattoo 4 months ago
Beautiful vid clip. Many thanks. How will this rig work if one is running fast?
openuniverse2003 5 months ago
@openuniverse2003 not bad at all really
sprattoo 5 months ago
@openuniverse2003 If you balance it correctly IE just BARELY enough weight for the frame to slowly right itself, it works quite well.
Keep in mind though it's still an 8 or 10 rig so maybe it doesn't do everything an $800 Merlin would do, but it comes pretty dang close, because the same physics are at play.
sprattoo 5 months ago
@sprattoo eer I meant 8 or 10 dollar rig
sprattoo 5 months ago
ok i get it its btw a great design
matthijsfleumer 6 months ago
Now that's one frugal treehouse
moedem 6 months ago
@moedem haaa, no kidding. Its bits & pieces of scrap left over from tearing apart an old Deck when I bought my house.
sprattoo 5 months ago
@S8OR wow.. being an artist... I don't know what to say to that... thanks.
(Although I am a digital painter too... not sure where that falls in.)
sprattoo 6 months ago
you can also buy a camera with steadyshot
matthijsfleumer 7 months ago
@matthijsfleumer almost all cams now have steadyshot, however, it is very limited.
A steadyshot feature is made to fine tune slight "jiggling" if you are hand held and zoom way in.
A steadicam stabilizes the whole camera itself while you walk, run, whatever.
There is a huge difference
sprattoo 6 months ago
you hit the spot with that steadycam makes those who buy a 800 dollar one look like damn stupid, I prefer you steady cam than those who are just ripping us off with their so call pro steady cam.
atabeylive 7 months ago
@atabeylive thanks.
The $800 rigs are very adjustable, though and theres no building required.
I am trying to come up with one for a pro-sumer sized Cam (I have the Sony HDR FX 1) A much larger and heavier camera.
Also working on plans for a home-made Jib arm.
sprattoo 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is pretty impressive but I would never trust my DSLR on something I put together on my own. I've been using the Cam Caddie Scorpion going for about $38 on Amazon and it's improved every single shot I've taken since I bought it. I recommend it to anyone seeking an independent setup.
FrankensteinsTV 7 months ago
I think it is a brilliant design, but I don't think I can build it. Can you build one and sell it to me? I can send a check. I really like how small and light you've built this.
You know the footage of the man at the pond...this is wonderful. It would be neat to overlay some audio of him talking about the good ole days and relating some stores, etc. thanks! ~aubie
always wanted to visit New Hampshire...live free or die! that's gotta be the best motto
aubie0071971 7 months ago
Nice work!
ABSjazz 7 months ago
nice video man, looks like a quality piece of bodgery!
TheKarlish 9 months ago
@TheKarlish Thanks man... When you're broke I guess you need to adapt.
Still, It works pretty good.
sprattoo 9 months ago
So many people run immediately to the store to before they start any project. Look around you a little first.
The average Facebook user has 130 friends. Post what you are looking for, or are doing. Of those 130 immediate friends who have 130 friends each (avg) there has to be a welder in those 16,900 connections!
Or WHATEVER you are looking for.
Use your resources, transfer station, recycling center, and networks with a positive can-do attitude and everything will come together.
sprattoo 1 year ago
Well done! I've been playing with the idea of making one for some time and have spent much time on the net looking. You bagged it!!!! Thank you.
Keep innovating
jclayjim 1 year ago
The issue with this is the title. this is NOT an 8 dollar steadicam. It cost you 8 bucks because you had the good fortune to know a welder AND had some spare metal laying around. this is easily a 50 dollar project.
tewkewl 1 year ago
@tewkewl Why is that an issue?
I paid $8 and made a steadicam.
I think "Merlin Steadicam for $8.00 easy!" describes what I did.
And I also suggest offering a local auto shop the services of filming an advert or video in trade for tacking 2 bolts together. (which would make it free)
Also Scouring a transfer station will most likely yield a steel bar from a chain link fence.
(So... we're still at $8)
sprattoo 1 year ago
@sprattoo i'm not trying to be mean. just realistic. most people won't do this. i made a steady cam too for about 10 bucks, but i was able to do it without welders or something out of the way. the fact that you have to weld something together or find someone to weld something together for you will be a major hindrance.
lemoni1982 11 months ago
@lemoni1982 I understand that. Some cameras balance different too. The weld was only necessary for my particular Cam.
having both bolts in the same place (for handle and cam mount) can be moved forward or back by adding, removing length and altering the bend of the bar and balance weight. I opted for the weld to minimize on weight and it was an easy solution for me.
sprattoo 11 months ago
@lemoni1982 i don't think you need to weld, wouldn't it be fine to just use the JB Weld? thanks, ~aubie
aubie0071971 7 months ago
Having trouble finding that Sys track u joint 1951. Didn't see it one on Ebay. Where exactly can I get one?
BTW it is important to get your stabilizing weights as far in front and behind as possible. The weight of your spars by comparison to your weights is too much. For dynamic balance the three points of the triangle need to be where all the weight is dispersed.
steadibaby 1 year ago
@steadibaby You put the weights wherever it takes in minimal quanities to balances your rig. The point is to have the drive shaft weight at the center point between top and bottom. Other than that, the back weight only has to match the front side of the curve.
Do a search for Traxxas 1951 U joint.
sprattoo 1 year ago
@sprattoo That did it ! "Taxxas 1951 u joint" $7.41 on Amazon. Thanks
steadibaby 1 year ago
how do you attach your camera ?
Johnwells10 1 year ago
@Johnwells10 When I welded the heads of the bolts together the 1/4 x 20 sticks up on the top. I put a bit of a pad from an old tripod... but any piece of rubber or firm plastic will do, the screw the cam onto the bolt where the mounting hole is in the bottom of the cam
sprattoo 1 year ago
@sprattoo thanks! great video, i'm going to try and duplicate your model, cause its a great design! Thanks again, John
Johnwells10 1 year ago
@Johnwells10 happy to share. the key really is to get the pivot point of the handle exactly balanced so when you put the cam at 90 degrees sideways, it just slowly drifts back to upright. Too much bottom weight and it will rock when you move.
Good luck!
sprattoo 1 year ago
Very awesome, very simple!
Helioforge 1 year ago
Thanks for this video. Your ideas on the balance explained somethings that I've been wondering about. I have a glidecam 2000 and a Steadicam JR and I'm thaiking of building my own unit as neither of the work well with me canon 5d.
again, thanks for your time ;-)
TStudiosFilms 1 year ago
Thank you.
If I find the time, I will try to somewhat copy your design, or at least I was inspired by it.
tingtangtom 1 year ago
Great design, and awesome test footage! Great job.
joshdoube 1 year ago
@joshdoube thanks Josh. I watched your video quite a few times.... and many others before I started building. There were other prototypes before this one, but nothing worked as well, or was as cheap.
sprattoo 1 year ago