I didn't see any ownage, in fact I saw a lot of point-dodging by Johnson. Krauthammer made a crucial foreign policy point: Who controls the Sea? Control of the Pacific rim is vital to our economic interests (as in free and open trade with the east asian economies), and Johnson seems to think that China won't be able to control the sea with their current economic problems.
NEWSFLASH: This isn't going to cause the Chinese state to collapse. They will still be able to build a navy and air force.
I wonder if Krauthammer realizes that the US is borrowing money from China, and using that Chinese money to move the US navy in to try and curb China's influence in its own backyard. China is being dumb for essentially using its own money to screw itself, and the US is being dumb for not recognizing how that situation so obviously illustrates that it has an overstretched military.
How did Krauthmmer get OWNED by Johnson? Kruathammer asked him a specific question, which HE NEVER ANSWERED!. What do you want to do with our Navy? I want people to apply for jobs who agree with me. What about China's growing Navy? China has lot of problems, a whole not of problems, a bunch of problems, they have pressing issues. Your'e kidding, right, when you say K was owned by the side stepper? By the way, Mr. K is a parapalegic, which is why he appears to be stiff.
@RichardMNixon You're right. We don't. Let me ask you this. Why do you think that these leaders in the USA, the right-wing Republicans in particular, think that we need a military of such massive scale? It seem as if those in power in the USA, those who make decisions in the USA, are scared absolutely shitless of something. What the fuck are they afraid of???
They're not scared of anything, they just get huge kickbacks from the military-industrial complex that Eisenhower warned about. These things are always about money.
@RichardMNixon Oh, ok. The military industrial complex. I almost forgot about that. Funny how the only people who really complain about that are libertarians, a few liberals/democrats, but almost no conservatives/republicans.
@UGLYSTIKCOLIN Well, I just want to know what the hell motivates these people into having it and not needing it besides just simply having it. There has to be a bigger underlying thing going on here. RichardMNixon explained it pretty well, I think.
@docdoom187 Well for starters, were not exactly best friends with much of anyone. You really want to rely on the Europeans for help when shit hits the fan? I don't. Isreal can hold their own but if things got bad you know the Middle East would reign a firestorm onto Israel first chance they get. Best defense is a good offense, but then again, who knows where in the world we have military. I'm sure we've got enough firepower in Nuclear Subs to reign hell on the world if we had to.
@dog1701 Krauthammer didn't hardly allow him to speak, basically interrupted him every single time he tried to make a comment, but this is common behavior for Faux News.
He's pretty good, but his ideas about getting involved in the internal disputes of other nations are misguided. The federal government has no authority to get involved in such things, for a variety of very good reasons. If individual Americans want to pool their money together or risk their own lives to stop "genocide" in a foreign country, that's up to them. Others may not want to risk life, limb, and money for a cause with which they may disagree. This is what living in a republic is all about
I HIGHLY recommend all Gary Johnson supporters to vote for Ron Paul. Right now Mitt Romney has won in both Iowa and New Hampshire. Do you want to see Romney become president?? I figured not. We can have Gary Johnson for 2016, but right now, we have a *good shot at getting Ron Paul elected, and we should put all our efforts into him. I like Gary, but it will be a strenuous task to try and get people to vote for him this far in the game.
He avoided the question... How is this video called "owned"? Krauthammer is paid to ask tough questions. I vote thumbs down this video for being misleading.
Nothing more dangerous to the cause of liberty than a politician fixated on re-election. Obama is the worst President in modern history. Such a failure.That's what you get when you elect a noob, back-bencher whose claim to fame is being ACORN's lawyer.Trash begets trashy legacy. He's so arrogant & won’t pay any attention to how this country feels. I'm surprised his numbers haven’t fallen out the door. He's a disaster & I believe the election is going to show the real side of him
what do I tell the military? I would tell the that I respect them and value their lives more than to waste them on foreign adventurism that benefits no one but a handful of billionaires
After the past three years of incompetence, it’s good to see that Obie has suddenly been anointed “the great one.” In a Jimmy Carter sort of way? At least he can claim he’s smarter than Behner and the Country-Club RINOs. The Dem’s strategy has worked with me. I give up on both of the corrupt political parties. I’ll attend my caucus and try to get votes for Ron Paul and then only need to decide which INDEPENDENT candidate gets my vote.
@stealthpakfa your statement is based on the fallacy that there is a finite amount of work to be done - that the Chinese can "take our jobs" - the reason that our economy is suffering isn't because the Chinese economy is growing, it's because we've taxed, regulated and "stimulated" our economy to death - not to mention spending trillions of dollars on pointless wars abroad and welfare queens at home. We went on a spending binge for 20+ years - now it's time to pay the bills.
@stealthpakfa lets look at china's economy. their economy is infrastructure based, no doubt. this is like the parable of the two towns. these two towns are separated by a river. in order to grow the economy, one of the towns builds a bridge, connecting the towns. this leads to an economic boom. then, to increase the economy even more, they build another bridge, leading to an economic boom. sensing a trend, they continue to build bridges, each providing economic growth. but eventually, they stop
@stealthpakfa growing. why? because by the umpteenth bridge theyve built, the economic growth created by the bridge ceases to exist. this is the same for china's economy- they continue to build more and more infrastructure, which does create economic growth. but it can only sustain itself for so long before it runs dry, which will happen within the next 15 years. so yes, china's economy may outlast the us's economy in 10 years, but it will not be able to keep this position.
@stealthpakfa that is basic economics. your basic economics is state control of the economy which leads to waste and lower quality of life for the citizens. china is 135th in the world in economic freedom. that means, essentially, that the citizens have little money. it is true that the united states is a "ponzi scheme" as you like to put it, but this is due to the liberal economics we try to institute. you fail to recall, however, that china is in debt to japan as well.
Krauthammer can't even look into his eyes when he speaks....Such disrespect to honest candidates now. So sick of this bullshit.. We bomb our brown brothers in the middle east for what? Oil? We got plenty with our allies to the North and the South. We should of bombed Fox news, MSNBC and CNN for distorting the necessary information we all should of known.
Wow... this guy Krauthammer is a total zombie... he talks like a dead man hungry for fresh brains... somebody revive this asshole so that he can raise a sensible point in the conversation... or not.
Krauthammer is such a ghoul. I swear this man is a talking corpse that rambles on about neo-con wet dreams! What a joke, kick that man out of the room!
the man is brilliant, and i would love to hear your specific examples rather than just generalizations and melodramatic exagerations. Also, bashing his physical appearance is quite a low blow on your part
Everybody wants a cut and dried response to a complicated question. How does any presidential candidate know how he would respond to a given situation, without first seeing the STAMPED SECRET presidential daily briefing? At least with Gary Johnson in the White House, we'll know we're not being lied to. The man doesn't lie; he's not smooth and slick enough. I find that appealing for a change.
@danmannz Gary Johnson is so weak its not even funny. China is not spending as much because the HACK OUR COMPUTERS!!! geez what an idiot!! You seriously need to get real. Johnson never even answered the freakin question. Weak...Weak...Weak.
GaryJohnson didn't lie he answered the question according to his experience & why would we even worry abt a fight with China"taking control" when they r actually paying our bills right now! How sad not even foxnews HEARS THE VOICE of REASON! #unbelievable I could b witnessing how news networks control everything! very sad day in our history! They push puppets ahead & literally control elections for what they want! Not the voice of the people! Peoples President Campaign #Liberty GaryJohnson2012
Finally, a politician willing to base foreign policy on using specific weaknesses inherent in that country as checks to excessive military force. ATM, we're militarizing ourselves broke building and policing and protecting the world (even China) while China spends a fraction of that on national defense. Let China pick up their whole military budget and the state-run housing market will be put under enough pressure that their "housing-bubble" will pop, more catastrophically than did ours in 08.
Krauthammer didn't even come close to getting owned. He brought up some excellent points and Johnson looked like an idiot who didn't do his homework.
FinickyGreek 1 week ago
@FinickyGreek What "excelent" points? The idiocy that Homefront is actually a prediction?
The man got owned, and you are a shit-eating conservative fucktard.
makokun9 2 days ago
@makokun9 That black dick in your mouth is fucking with your thinking processes...spit it out already, you greedy cocksucker!
FinickyGreek 2 days ago
@FinickyGreek As long as you take that white dick filling your rectum with semen, inbred failure.
makokun9 2 days ago
Is this Krauthammer guy braindead? I mean seriously, just look at him during the conversation... he can't even make eye contact.
ConzenEW 1 week ago
Wow. How desperate the left to claim THIS a win.
TheWebUnderCeij 1 week ago
I didn't see any ownage, in fact I saw a lot of point-dodging by Johnson. Krauthammer made a crucial foreign policy point: Who controls the Sea? Control of the Pacific rim is vital to our economic interests (as in free and open trade with the east asian economies), and Johnson seems to think that China won't be able to control the sea with their current economic problems.
NEWSFLASH: This isn't going to cause the Chinese state to collapse. They will still be able to build a navy and air force.
migkillertwo 2 weeks ago
Kirsten Powers keeps checking out Johnson's johnson.
KenMacMillan 2 weeks ago 3
Frauthammmer looks like something the devil shit out
WorldMilitia 2 weeks ago
@WorldMilitia You said it...he is one ugly man
AliceNchainz011 2 weeks ago
OWNED
Jimjammajay 2 weeks ago
the blonde whore on the left is getting wet while krauthammer is speaking. love how the little smirk on krauthammer's face disappears. fukin assholes
beidlgsicht 3 weeks ago
@beidlgsicht she looks like she would be a good whore/slut, too...
docdoom187 3 weeks ago
I wonder if Krauthammer realizes that the US is borrowing money from China, and using that Chinese money to move the US navy in to try and curb China's influence in its own backyard. China is being dumb for essentially using its own money to screw itself, and the US is being dumb for not recognizing how that situation so obviously illustrates that it has an overstretched military.
13lackLight 1 month ago 9
@13lackLight Good point
danmannz 1 month ago
@13lackLight Good point
danmannz 1 month ago
@13lackLight i wonder if you realize that only 8 % of our debt is from china...
billayala123 4 weeks ago
@billayala123 who the hell cares? they are still lending to us, and money is fungible
13lackLight 3 weeks ago
@13lackLight Go look up some of Donald Trumps interviews about China. They are screwing us royally.
UGLYSTIKCOLIN 3 weeks ago
Saurkrauthammer has a that funny triangular lip.
htiberian 1 month ago
@htiberian that's how Jews look! LOL, just kidding. :D
docdoom187 1 month ago
I wondered how Krauthammer's face got all messed up. GJ socked it to him!
stevemcgee99 1 month ago
How did Krauthmmer get OWNED by Johnson? Kruathammer asked him a specific question, which HE NEVER ANSWERED!. What do you want to do with our Navy? I want people to apply for jobs who agree with me. What about China's growing Navy? China has lot of problems, a whole not of problems, a bunch of problems, they have pressing issues. Your'e kidding, right, when you say K was owned by the side stepper? By the way, Mr. K is a parapalegic, which is why he appears to be stiff.
dog1701 1 month ago
@dog1701
He shot down K's imaginary demons. We don't need a military strong enough to beat the rest of the world put together.
RichardMNixon 1 month ago
@RichardMNixon You're right. We don't. Let me ask you this. Why do you think that these leaders in the USA, the right-wing Republicans in particular, think that we need a military of such massive scale? It seem as if those in power in the USA, those who make decisions in the USA, are scared absolutely shitless of something. What the fuck are they afraid of???
docdoom187 1 month ago
@docdoom187
They're not scared of anything, they just get huge kickbacks from the military-industrial complex that Eisenhower warned about. These things are always about money.
RichardMNixon 1 month ago
@RichardMNixon Oh, ok. The military industrial complex. I almost forgot about that. Funny how the only people who really complain about that are libertarians, a few liberals/democrats, but almost no conservatives/republicans.
docdoom187 1 month ago
@docdoom187 I don't think it's a matter of being afraid. It's a matter of having it and not needing it, rather than needing it and not having it.
UGLYSTIKCOLIN 3 weeks ago
@UGLYSTIKCOLIN Well, I just want to know what the hell motivates these people into having it and not needing it besides just simply having it. There has to be a bigger underlying thing going on here. RichardMNixon explained it pretty well, I think.
docdoom187 3 weeks ago
@docdoom187 Well for starters, were not exactly best friends with much of anyone. You really want to rely on the Europeans for help when shit hits the fan? I don't. Isreal can hold their own but if things got bad you know the Middle East would reign a firestorm onto Israel first chance they get. Best defense is a good offense, but then again, who knows where in the world we have military. I'm sure we've got enough firepower in Nuclear Subs to reign hell on the world if we had to.
UGLYSTIKCOLIN 3 weeks ago
@dog1701 Krauthammer didn't hardly allow him to speak, basically interrupted him every single time he tried to make a comment, but this is common behavior for Faux News.
nataliarunes23 1 month ago
He's pretty good, but his ideas about getting involved in the internal disputes of other nations are misguided. The federal government has no authority to get involved in such things, for a variety of very good reasons. If individual Americans want to pool their money together or risk their own lives to stop "genocide" in a foreign country, that's up to them. Others may not want to risk life, limb, and money for a cause with which they may disagree. This is what living in a republic is all about
anphernie 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I HIGHLY recommend all Gary Johnson supporters to vote for Ron Paul. Right now Mitt Romney has won in both Iowa and New Hampshire. Do you want to see Romney become president?? I figured not. We can have Gary Johnson for 2016, but right now, we have a *good shot at getting Ron Paul elected, and we should put all our efforts into him. I like Gary, but it will be a strenuous task to try and get people to vote for him this far in the game.
esca8652 1 month ago
Would love it if someone could upload or direct me to this full interview
absurdity89 1 month ago
I approve of Gary Johnson's message here, but I hardly think he "owned" Krauthammer.
JamesonGraber 1 month ago 5
He avoided the question... How is this video called "owned"? Krauthammer is paid to ask tough questions. I vote thumbs down this video for being misleading.
Neavris 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nothing more dangerous to the cause of liberty than a politician fixated on re-election. Obama is the worst President in modern history. Such a failure.That's what you get when you elect a noob, back-bencher whose claim to fame is being ACORN's lawyer.Trash begets trashy legacy. He's so arrogant & won’t pay any attention to how this country feels. I'm surprised his numbers haven’t fallen out the door. He's a disaster & I believe the election is going to show the real side of him
onstageagain 2 months ago
Uh Nixon face. Scary.
housecry 2 months ago
How is this getting owned? China is increasing spending on military so this guy is wrong on what he thinks China would do.
Xantheus07 2 months ago
what do I tell the military? I would tell the that I respect them and value their lives more than to waste them on foreign adventurism that benefits no one but a handful of billionaires
kayaker712 2 months ago 3
the entire US economy is based on debt.
its not an economy, its a ponzi scheme.
bernie madoff should be the secretary of the treasury.
stealthpakfa 2 months ago 2
@stealthpakfa Madoff is currently unavailable, but Tim Geither is taking care of that role.
AKSBSU 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
After the past three years of incompetence, it’s good to see that Obie has suddenly been anointed “the great one.” In a Jimmy Carter sort of way? At least he can claim he’s smarter than Behner and the Country-Club RINOs. The Dem’s strategy has worked with me. I give up on both of the corrupt political parties. I’ll attend my caucus and try to get votes for Ron Paul and then only need to decide which INDEPENDENT candidate gets my vote.
DeepThought42a 2 months ago
Youtube this:
Former CIA Michael Scheuer on FOX: Israel & Saudi Arabia Behind Iranian Terror Plot
Vote4RonPaulLiberty 2 months ago
gary johnson has been drinking jim chanos' cum.
china will overtake the US economy within 10 years.
stealthpakfa 2 months ago
@stealthpakfa your statement is based on the fallacy that there is a finite amount of work to be done - that the Chinese can "take our jobs" - the reason that our economy is suffering isn't because the Chinese economy is growing, it's because we've taxed, regulated and "stimulated" our economy to death - not to mention spending trillions of dollars on pointless wars abroad and welfare queens at home. We went on a spending binge for 20+ years - now it's time to pay the bills.
gergenheimer 2 months ago
@stealthpakfa lets look at china's economy. their economy is infrastructure based, no doubt. this is like the parable of the two towns. these two towns are separated by a river. in order to grow the economy, one of the towns builds a bridge, connecting the towns. this leads to an economic boom. then, to increase the economy even more, they build another bridge, leading to an economic boom. sensing a trend, they continue to build bridges, each providing economic growth. but eventually, they stop
jpthehp 2 months ago
@stealthpakfa growing. why? because by the umpteenth bridge theyve built, the economic growth created by the bridge ceases to exist. this is the same for china's economy- they continue to build more and more infrastructure, which does create economic growth. but it can only sustain itself for so long before it runs dry, which will happen within the next 15 years. so yes, china's economy may outlast the us's economy in 10 years, but it will not be able to keep this position.
jpthehp 2 months ago
@jpthehp LMAO!
what a total moron u are.
u too have been drinking too much of jim chano' cum.
learn basic economics kid, before talking economics.
the US economy is a ponzi scheme based on debt.
china is based on manufacturing, savings, underconsumption, investment, budget surplus, trade surplus.
US is based on borrowed money from china to get its gdp up by printing trillions of dollars. no savings, no production, just debt.
US economy will collapse within this decade.
stealthpakfa 2 months ago
@stealthpakfa that is basic economics. your basic economics is state control of the economy which leads to waste and lower quality of life for the citizens. china is 135th in the world in economic freedom. that means, essentially, that the citizens have little money. it is true that the united states is a "ponzi scheme" as you like to put it, but this is due to the liberal economics we try to institute. you fail to recall, however, that china is in debt to japan as well.
jpthehp 2 months ago
@DeathPanels1 nice wet dream
stealthpakfa 2 months ago
Krauthammer can't even look into his eyes when he speaks....Such disrespect to honest candidates now. So sick of this bullshit.. We bomb our brown brothers in the middle east for what? Oil? We got plenty with our allies to the North and the South. We should of bombed Fox news, MSNBC and CNN for distorting the necessary information we all should of known.
Reido2828 2 months ago
That was a great response.
maidenak 2 months ago
Wow... this guy Krauthammer is a total zombie... he talks like a dead man hungry for fresh brains... somebody revive this asshole so that he can raise a sensible point in the conversation... or not.
melbyRick 3 months ago
owned indeed!
Uriel1816 3 months ago
lmao @ ghoul
pirunravel 3 months ago
Krauthammer is such a ghoul. I swear this man is a talking corpse that rambles on about neo-con wet dreams! What a joke, kick that man out of the room!
mark23socom 3 months ago 47
@mark23socom Ditto
Uriel1816 3 months ago
@mark23socom
you are so sadly mistaken.
the man is brilliant, and i would love to hear your specific examples rather than just generalizations and melodramatic exagerations. Also, bashing his physical appearance is quite a low blow on your part
laxdnumber3 2 months ago
@mark23socom haha good one...
ismuks 2 months ago
@mark23socom throw him in the closet!
SRJuncaj 1 month ago
Krauthammer looks like a turtle.
atchisrj1 3 months ago
he just kicked charles in the knee thats all. he probally didnt even feel it
jdeden42 3 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
This is being owned???
Oh, Reginald... I Disagree!
DrMelWaters 4 months ago
Johnson's accurate.
TMaw345 4 months ago
Everybody wants a cut and dried response to a complicated question. How does any presidential candidate know how he would respond to a given situation, without first seeing the STAMPED SECRET presidential daily briefing? At least with Gary Johnson in the White House, we'll know we're not being lied to. The man doesn't lie; he's not smooth and slick enough. I find that appealing for a change.
signalfire6 4 months ago
@danmannz Gary Johnson is so weak its not even funny. China is not spending as much because the HACK OUR COMPUTERS!!! geez what an idiot!! You seriously need to get real. Johnson never even answered the freakin question. Weak...Weak...Weak.
lanebatts26 4 months ago
@lanebatts26 Whatever you say, shill.
Bugsyboy333 4 months ago
GaryJohnson didn't lie he answered the question according to his experience & why would we even worry abt a fight with China"taking control" when they r actually paying our bills right now! How sad not even foxnews HEARS THE VOICE of REASON! #unbelievable I could b witnessing how news networks control everything! very sad day in our history! They push puppets ahead & literally control elections for what they want! Not the voice of the people! Peoples President Campaign #Liberty GaryJohnson2012
AJRevelante 4 months ago
And the guy talks like a wimp.
bakamundo 4 months ago
@bakamundo yes...the wimps you speak of own Banks...and companies...you know
TheJasonDR 3 months ago
Doesn't look that way to me.
bakamundo 4 months ago
RON PAUL/GARY JOHNSON 2012
HalfBornUnicornFetus 4 months ago 40
Answer the question, Gary.
maggybeee 4 months ago
How does Krauthammer get owned here? GJ avoids the question two or three times before he answers it.
Fermion5 4 months ago
@Fermion5 True, but when he finally got around to it, he totally won the argument.
Naufragus420 4 months ago
@Fermion5
and yet still answered it and gave the reasoning behind his response...
stealthswimmer 4 months ago 2
Finally, a politician willing to base foreign policy on using specific weaknesses inherent in that country as checks to excessive military force. ATM, we're militarizing ourselves broke building and policing and protecting the world (even China) while China spends a fraction of that on national defense. Let China pick up their whole military budget and the state-run housing market will be put under enough pressure that their "housing-bubble" will pop, more catastrophically than did ours in 08.
adv4change 4 months ago 2