Added: 4 months ago
From: danmannz
Views: 7,731
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (81)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Krauthammer didn't even come close to getting owned. He brought up some excellent points and Johnson looked like an idiot who didn't do his homework.

  • @FinickyGreek What "excelent" points? The idiocy that Homefront is actually a prediction?

    The man got owned, and you are a shit-eating conservative fucktard.

  • @makokun9 That black dick in your mouth is fucking with your thinking processes...spit it out already, you greedy cocksucker!

  • @FinickyGreek As long as you take that white dick filling your rectum with semen, inbred failure.

  • Is this Krauthammer guy braindead? I mean seriously, just look at him during the conversation... he can't even make eye contact.

  • Wow. How desperate the left to claim THIS a win.

  • I didn't see any ownage, in fact I saw a lot of point-dodging by Johnson. Krauthammer made a crucial foreign policy point: Who controls the Sea? Control of the Pacific rim is vital to our economic interests (as in free and open trade with the east asian economies), and Johnson seems to think that China won't be able to control the sea with their current economic problems.

    NEWSFLASH: This isn't going to cause the Chinese state to collapse. They will still be able to build a navy and air force.

  • Kirsten Powers keeps checking out Johnson's johnson.

  • Frauthammmer looks like something the devil shit out 

  • @WorldMilitia You said it...he is one ugly man

  • OWNED

  • the blonde whore on the left is getting wet while krauthammer is speaking. love how the little smirk on krauthammer's face disappears. fukin assholes

  • @beidlgsicht she looks like she would be a good whore/slut, too...

  • I wonder if Krauthammer realizes that the US is borrowing money from China, and using that Chinese money to move the US navy in to try and curb China's influence in its own backyard. China is being dumb for essentially using its own money to screw itself, and the US is being dumb for not recognizing how that situation so obviously illustrates that it has an overstretched military.

  • @13lackLight Good point

  • @13lackLight Good point

  • @13lackLight i wonder if you realize that only 8 % of our debt is from china...

  • @billayala123 who the hell cares? they are still lending to us, and money is fungible 

  • @13lackLight Go look up some of Donald Trumps interviews about China. They are screwing us royally.

  • Saurkrauthammer has a that funny triangular lip.

  • @htiberian that's how Jews look! LOL, just kidding. :D

  • I wondered how Krauthammer's face got all messed up. GJ socked it to him!

  • How did Krauthmmer get OWNED by Johnson? Kruathammer asked him a specific question, which HE NEVER ANSWERED!. What do you want to do with our Navy? I want people to apply for jobs who agree with me. What about China's growing Navy? China has lot of problems, a whole not of problems, a bunch of problems, they have pressing issues. Your'e kidding, right, when you say K was owned by the side stepper? By the way, Mr. K is a parapalegic, which is why he appears to be stiff.

  • @dog1701

    He shot down K's imaginary demons. We don't need a military strong enough to beat the rest of the world put together.

  • @RichardMNixon You're right. We don't. Let me ask you this. Why do you think that these leaders in the USA, the right-wing Republicans in particular, think that we need a military of such massive scale? It seem as if those in power in the USA, those who make decisions in the USA, are scared absolutely shitless of something. What the fuck are they afraid of???

  • @docdoom187

    They're not scared of anything, they just get huge kickbacks from the military-industrial complex that Eisenhower warned about. These things are always about money.

  • @RichardMNixon Oh, ok. The military industrial complex. I almost forgot about that. Funny how the only people who really complain about that are libertarians, a few liberals/democrats, but almost no conservatives/republicans.

  • @docdoom187 I don't think it's a matter of being afraid. It's a matter of having it and not needing it, rather than needing it and not having it.

  • @UGLYSTIKCOLIN Well, I just want to know what the hell motivates these people into having it and not needing it besides just simply having it. There has to be a bigger underlying thing going on here. RichardMNixon explained it pretty well, I think.

  • @docdoom187 Well for starters, were not exactly best friends with much of anyone. You really want to rely on the Europeans for help when shit hits the fan? I don't. Isreal can hold their own but if things got bad you know the Middle East would reign a firestorm onto Israel first chance they get. Best defense is a good offense, but then again, who knows where in the world we have military. I'm sure we've got enough firepower in Nuclear Subs to reign hell on the world if we had to.

  • @dog1701 Krauthammer didn't hardly allow him to speak, basically interrupted him every single time he tried to make a comment, but this is common behavior for Faux News.

  • He's pretty good, but his ideas about getting involved in the internal disputes of other nations are misguided. The federal government has no authority to get involved in such things, for a variety of very good reasons. If individual Americans want to pool their money together or risk their own lives to stop "genocide" in a foreign country, that's up to them. Others may not want to risk life, limb, and money for a cause with which they may disagree. This is what living in a republic is all about

  • Would love it if someone could upload or direct me to this full interview

  • I approve of Gary Johnson's message here, but I hardly think he "owned" Krauthammer.

  • He avoided the question... How is this video called "owned"? Krauthammer is paid to ask tough questions. I vote thumbs down this video for being misleading.

  • Uh Nixon face. Scary.

  • How is this getting owned? China is increasing spending on military so this guy is wrong on what he thinks China would do.

  • what do I tell the military? I would tell the that I respect them and value their lives more than to waste them on foreign adventurism that benefits no one but a handful of billionaires

  • the entire US economy is based on debt.

    its not an economy, its a ponzi scheme.

    bernie madoff should be the secretary of the treasury.

  • @stealthpakfa Madoff is currently unavailable, but Tim Geither is taking care of that role.

  • Youtube this:

    Former CIA Michael Scheuer on FOX: Israel & Saudi Arabia Behind Iranian Terror Plot

  • gary johnson has been drinking jim chanos' cum.

    china will overtake the US economy within 10 years.

  • @stealthpakfa your statement is based on the fallacy that there is a finite amount of work to be done - that the Chinese can "take our jobs" - the reason that our economy is suffering isn't because the Chinese economy is growing, it's because we've taxed, regulated and "stimulated" our economy to death - not to mention spending trillions of dollars on pointless wars abroad and welfare queens at home. We went on a spending binge for 20+ years - now it's time to pay the bills.

  • @stealthpakfa lets look at china's economy. their economy is infrastructure based, no doubt. this is like the parable of the two towns. these two towns are separated by a river. in order to grow the economy, one of the towns builds a bridge, connecting the towns. this leads to an economic boom. then, to increase the economy even more, they build another bridge, leading to an economic boom. sensing a trend, they continue to build bridges, each providing economic growth. but eventually, they stop

  • @stealthpakfa growing. why? because by the umpteenth bridge theyve built, the economic growth created by the bridge ceases to exist. this is the same for china's economy- they continue to build more and more infrastructure, which does create economic growth. but it can only sustain itself for so long before it runs dry, which will happen within the next 15 years. so yes, china's economy may outlast the us's economy in 10 years, but it will not be able to keep this position.

  • @jpthehp LMAO!

    what a total moron u are.

    u too have been drinking too much of jim chano' cum.

    learn basic economics kid, before talking economics.

    the US economy is a ponzi scheme based on debt.

    china is based on manufacturing, savings, underconsumption, investment, budget surplus, trade surplus.

    US is based on borrowed money from china to get its gdp up by printing trillions of dollars. no savings, no production, just debt.

    US economy will collapse within this decade.

  • @stealthpakfa that is basic economics. your basic economics is state control of the economy which leads to waste and lower quality of life for the citizens. china is 135th in the world in economic freedom. that means, essentially, that the citizens have little money. it is true that the united states is a "ponzi scheme" as you like to put it, but this is due to the liberal economics we try to institute. you fail to recall, however, that china is in debt to japan as well.

  • @DeathPanels1 nice wet dream

  • Krauthammer can't even look into his eyes when he speaks....Such disrespect to honest candidates now. So sick of this bullshit.. We bomb our brown brothers in the middle east for what? Oil? We got plenty with our allies to the North and the South. We should of bombed Fox news, MSNBC and CNN for distorting the necessary information we all should of known.

  • That was a great response.

  • Wow... this guy Krauthammer is a total zombie... he talks like a dead man hungry for fresh brains... somebody revive this asshole so that he can raise a sensible point in the conversation... or not.

  • owned indeed!

  • lmao @ ghoul

  • Krauthammer is such a ghoul. I swear this man is a talking corpse that rambles on about neo-con wet dreams! What a joke, kick that man out of the room!

  • @mark23socom Ditto

  • @mark23socom

    you are so sadly mistaken.

    the man is brilliant, and i would love to hear your specific examples rather than just generalizations and melodramatic exagerations. Also, bashing his physical appearance is quite a low blow on your part

  • @mark23socom haha good one...

  • @mark23socom throw him in the closet!

  • Krauthammer looks like a turtle.

  • he just kicked charles in the knee thats all. he probally didnt even feel it

  • Johnson's accurate. 

  • Everybody wants a cut and dried response to a complicated question. How does any presidential candidate know how he would respond to a given situation, without first seeing the STAMPED SECRET presidential daily briefing? At least with Gary Johnson in the White House, we'll know we're not being lied to. The man doesn't lie; he's not smooth and slick enough. I find that appealing for a change.

  • @danmannz Gary Johnson is so weak its not even funny. China is not spending as much because the HACK OUR COMPUTERS!!! geez what an idiot!! You seriously need to get real. Johnson never even answered the freakin question. Weak...Weak...Weak.

  • @lanebatts26 Whatever you say, shill.

  • GaryJohnson didn't lie he answered the question according to his experience & why would we even worry abt a fight with China"taking control" when they r actually paying our bills right now! How sad not even foxnews HEARS THE VOICE of REASON! #unbelievable I could b witnessing how news networks control everything! very sad day in our history! They push puppets ahead & literally control elections for what they want! Not the voice of the people! Peoples President Campaign #Liberty GaryJohnson2012

  • And the guy talks like a wimp.

  • @bakamundo yes...the wimps you speak of own Banks...and companies...you know

  • Doesn't look that way to me.

  • RON PAUL/GARY JOHNSON 2012

  • Answer the question, Gary.

  • How does Krauthammer get owned here? GJ avoids the question two or three times before he answers it.

  • @Fermion5 True, but when he finally got around to it, he totally won the argument.

  • @Fermion5

    and yet still answered it and gave the reasoning behind his response...

  • Finally, a politician willing to base foreign policy on using specific weaknesses inherent in that country as checks to excessive military force. ATM, we're militarizing ourselves broke building and policing and protecting the world (even China) while China spends a fraction of that on national defense. Let China pick up their whole military budget and the state-run housing market will be put under enough pressure that their "housing-bubble" will pop, more catastrophically than did ours in 08.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more